Fiscal Year 1993 ** * * a V u11 1993 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS IEM 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 APPROPRIATIONS (SMilIONS) Navigation Flood Control Total Flood Control Mississppi River& Tributaries 1 Multipurpose inchilling power BeachE rosioCno ntrol Total New Work 2 Other Work TO)TAL NAVIGATION (Calendar Year) 4 Ton-Miles of Conanerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports" Foreign, G(rat Lakes Ports DomestiCc,oa stal (Intraterritory not compiled) DonesticG,r eatL akes DomesticIn,la ndx Donestic, Local TOTAL Tonso fC ominner(cMei llions) Foreign, CoastaPlor ts Foreign, G}ral Lakes Ports Donestic, Coasiaaln d Intraterritors Donstic, (reat Lakes Domesticl,n lal Domestic, Local T(TlAL FLOOD DAMAGES PREVEN'IED k$ Billion) FLOOD DAMAGES SUFTERFD ($ Billion) POWER Installed (Cmi taivien i n nillionts of kw) Ceerir td Bi Stos f kwh) i RESRIVOIR Storag(eM ili ms of acrefe et) Ioxl Control (Maximunm) Water Supply irrigation PUBLIC Al ITENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS Recreti oinI ays of Un (Millions) Visitx DayisM illioni) 6 (1e sri Invest igation Coinstructt ii (lener (perati.ons & Mdlttettaice, (neiali Floxl CotrolM ississippi River & Tribs. Gereral Expenses Flxid Contrl & Coastal Energencies RevolviFngil x Prnisent Appropriatioi In ed in Flood Control taAL InclUded in Flood Control Total 451 461 437 439 519 512 443 299 304.0 257.0 860 914 901 879 856 840 787 673 676 647 1212) 108 70 1,489 2364 3,853 70 56 1,501 2,167 3,668 74,9)38.60 21,027.60 502,311.00 55,784.60 297,638.70 950 992 45.5 621.0 76.8 2.132.00 (221) 62 66 1,466 1,848 3,314 76,622.30 17,102.60 502,133.00 55,339.10 289,959.00 968 971,8 418 299.1 1034 600.4 75.6 2,092.10 (220) 60 43 1,421 1,776 3,197 77,942.8 24,330.8 479,133.6 60,929.9 292,393.3 1,087.0 991.1 50.5 303.2 110.2 622.5 86.4 2,163.9 (222) 73 27 1,475 1,770 3,245 68,563.4 27,118.9 483,888.6 58,307.6 272,157.4 1,196.3 983.1 54.8 3(17.2 1 09.1 606.0 80.2 2,140.4 (205) 73 27 1,452 1,826 3,278 56,208.2 24,448.4 561,594.9 58,159.4 269,035.7 1,183.9 923.7 525 330.3 109.7 588.1 83.7 2,088.0 (206) 69 23 1,221 1,813 3,135 50,985.0 22,003.3 586,818.7 50,076.4 257,336.4 1,197.2 845.1 45.9 328.2 96.5 56938 82.0 1,874.4 (227) 93 17 1,082 1,658 2,730 47,274.2 24,235.2 580,888.7 43,198.2 248,116.9 1,102.0 791.4 45.7 312.0 87.4 560.5 77.4 1,788.4 (225) 112 12 1,104 1,797 2,901 44,769.3 27,171.9 610,976.5 48,184.0 232,707.5 1,157.1 723.0 51.3 313.2 92.0 534.7 74.2 1,836.0 (203) 171 1,12 7 1,567 2,668 46,508.8 32,249.4 593,923.1 49,784.4 242,855.4 1,099.7 744 5 58.8 311.1 98.0 542.5 81.1 1,707.7 8.1 17.5 17.6 8.3 2.1 5.2 273 10.8 16.8 131 1.7 1.6 1.1 0.2 1A 6.0 05 3.5 207 20.7 20.0 20.7 20.7 20.7 203 20.1 5 19.7 5 08.2 83.9 81.6 78.5 69.6 74.0 80.7 88.3 9L2 273.6 123.3 95 7.8 273.6 123.3 9.5 7,1 ,123.0 9,2 506 502 482 203 192 190 191 191 181 146,810 i,260, 1 1,596,668 86,(000 351.182 141,00 130 133 3,730,343 194427 1284,142 86,0(CO 356, 437 141,50 35,0XX) 12,298133 3,668, 133 146,433 1,143,073 1,450,656 71,099 344,602 126,598 20,0(X)0 11,801 3,314,262 129,251 1,083,811 1,398,219 68,455 330,296 141,997 20,000 9,860 14,7001 3,196,589 142,405 1,184,735 1,370,714 63,752 332,5501 120,(XX) 20,(X03 0 9,(XX) 3,245,261 138,767 1,200,175 1,421,733 55,262 317,704 115,000 20,00X) 0 9,(X) 3,278,091 136,287 1,152,150 1,389,846 310,797 115,0(X) 10,(XX) 12,(X) 3,135,080 128,272 919,345 1,319,973 314,76(0 107,(X)0 48,925 7,(XX) 8,(XX) 2,830,050 Advance engineering and design and construction. Including mlajor rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippages applied to protjects. Operation and maintenance, surveys, ladministrative and misc. prograns and activities. 4 For further information on waterborne comnmerce, see Waterborne Commnerce oJfthe United States, published annually. Itm ay beio btained by v riting Commander, U. S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans. ATlN: (EI.MN-II)-S, Box 60267, New Orleans, L uisiana 70160-0267 5I ncludes New Melones and Spettishman, built by the Corps and operated by others 6. All Federal agencies changed to 'Visitor Days' at the direction of OMB 50,(XX) I,()(XX) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKSRI 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 3 1 MAY 1994 Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. Speaker of the Senate Washington, D. C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1993 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1988 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1992 and September 30, 1993. Sincerely, John . Zirschky Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 31 MAr 1994 Honorable Thomas S. Foley Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515-6501 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting Volume 'II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1993 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1988 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1992 and September 30, 1993. Sincerely, John H. Zirsch y Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) 4 CONTENTS New England Division..................... ....................... 1-1 Oct North Atlantic Division: New York, NY, District ............................................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District .............................................................. 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District ................... .......................................... 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District .............................................................. 5-1 South Atlantic Division: Wilmington, NC, District ........................................................... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ................................................................. 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ............................... .............................. 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ............................................................ 9-1 Mobile, AL, District .................................................................. 10-1 Lower Mississippi Valley Division: New Orleans, LA, District ........................................ ................ 11-1 Vicksburg, MS, District ........................................................... .... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District .................................................................. 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District ................................................................ 14-1 Ohio River Division: Nashville, TN, District .............................................................. 15-1 Louisville, KY, District ............................................................ 16-1 Huntington, WV, District ................................. ........................ 17-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District ................................................................ 18-1 O hio R iver .................................. ........................................ 19-1 North Central Division Buffalo, NY, District .............. ........................ .................... 20-1 Detroit, MI, District ...... ............................................................ 21-1 Chicago, IL, District ................... .............................................. 22-1 Rock Island, IL, District ....... ...................... ........................... 23-1 St. Paul, MN, District ............................................................ 24-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN................. 25-1 Missouri River Division: Omaha, NE, District.................................................................. 26-1 Kansas City, MO, District ........................................................... 27-1 Southwestern Division: Little Rock, AR, District ............................................................. 28-1 Tulsa, O K , D istrict .................................................................. 29-1 Fort Worth, TX, District............................................................. 30-1 G alveston, TX , D istrict ................................................................ 31-1 Albuquerque, NM, District .......................................................... 32-1 South Pacific Division: Los Angeles, CA District.................................................. 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District ...................................................... 34-1 Sacram ento, CA D istrict .............................................................. 35-1 Califl'ornia Debris Commission .................. .................... 35-IA Pacific O cean D ivision ................................................................. 36-I North Pacific Division: Portland, OR, District ................................................................. 37-1 Seattle, W A , D istrict ................................................................... . 38-1 W alla W alla, W A , District ........................................................... 39-1 A laska, A K , D istrict .................................................................... 40-1 Nfississippi River Commission .......................................... 41-1 Constniction Engineering Reseawh Laboratory ...................................... 42-1 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Lalboratory ...................................... 43-1 W aterways Experiment Station ............................................................ 44-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ...................................................... 45-1 Water Resources Support Center .......................................................... 46-1 Penri-nent International Association of Navigation Congresses ....................... 47-1 International Boundazy Waters Board ..................................................... 48-1 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ............................ 49-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Prepare(dness ............5.0-.1 Naturald Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activi ties .................. 51- 1 Appendices: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ................................................. A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction.......................................B-1 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction .............................. B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable ............................................... C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction ........................................... D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation .................... . E-1I Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ................ F-1I Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented ........................................... G-1 In d ex ......................................................................................... .. I-1 ii NEW ENGLAND DIVISION * The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Andrews River, MA.................................1-3 2. Aquatic Plant Control ............................. 1-3 3. Boston Harbor, MA ................................. 1-3 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA...............................1-4 5. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ..................... 1-4 6. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT ....1.-.4.. 7. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA .......................... 1-5 8. Green Harbor, M A ..................1.-.5..................... 9. Guilford Harbor, CT ................................ 1-5 10. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI .............. 1-6 11. Josias River, ME ..................................... 1-6 12. New Haven Harbor, CT .......................... 1-7 13. Newburyport Harbor, MA.......................1-7 14. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI ................................... 1-7 15. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH.....................1-8 16. Saco River, M E ............................................ 1-8 17. Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, M E ........................................ 1-9 18. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...1.-.9. 19. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.........1-9 20. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ................................... 1-9 Alterations of Bridges 21. Authorized Bridge Alteration ................. 1-9 Beach Erosion Control 22. Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT ............. 1-9 23. Revere Beach, MA ..................................... 1-10 24. Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, M E ....................................... 1-10 25. Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI ................................................. .1 -10 26. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT ............... 1-11 27. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects ......................................... 1-11 28. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................................... 1-11 29. Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization)...........................1-11 Flood Control 30. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .......... 1-11 30A. West Hill Dam, MA .................................. 1-12 31. Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA.. 1-12 32. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ..................................... 11-2 33. Connecticut River Basin, VT, N H, M A and CT...........................................1-12 33A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ............................. 1-13 33B. Barre Falls Dam, MA..................................1-14 33C. Birch Hill Dam, MA .............................. 1-14 33D. Colebrook River Lake, CT...........................1-14 33E. Conant Brook Dam, MA..............................1-14 33F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT ........ 1-14 33G. Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes, West River, VT.......1-15 33H. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT...............1-15 33I. Knightville Dam, MA ............................ 1-15 33J. Littleville Lake, MA .............................. 1-16 33K. North Hartland Lake, VT .................... 1....116 33L. North Springfield Lake, VT......................1-16 33M. Otter Brook Lake, NH .......................... 1-16 33N. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA..............1-16 330. Surry Mountain Lake, NH....................... 1-17 33P. Townshend Lake, VT ............................ 1-17 33Q. Tully Lake, MA......................................1-17 33R. Union Village Dam, VT ......................... 1-18 34. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA.........1-18 34A. Black Rock Lake, CT ........................... 1-18 34B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ...................... 1-18 34C. Hop Brook Lake, CT....................................1-18 34D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ................... 1-19 1-1 Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 Page Flood Control (Continued) 34E. Thomaston Dam, CT ............................. 1-19 35. Machias River, Machiasport, ME...............1-19 36. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-19 36A. Blackwater Dam, NH..................................1-20 36B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................ 1-20 36C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH..........................1-20 36D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............ 1-20 36E. North Nashua River, Leominster, MA.......1-21 37. Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME ........... 1-21 38. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, M A ....................................... 1-21 39. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME......................1-22 40. Roughans Point, Revere, MA.................1-22 41. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA ............ 1-22 42. Stamford, CT ................................. ..... 1-23 43. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA ....... 1-23 43A. Buffumville Lake, MA..............................1-23 43B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ....................... 1-23 43C. Hodges Village Dam, MA............................1-23 43D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT .................. 1-24 43E. West Thompson Lake, CT...........................1-24 43F. Westville Lake, MA ............................... 1-24 44. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ...1-24 45. Town River Bay, Quincy, MA...................1-24 46. West River, New Haven, CT ....................... 1-25 47. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......... ........................... 1-25 48. Flood Control Reservoir Operations...........1-26 49. Hurricane Barrier Operations ................. 1-26 50. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 1-26 51. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 1-26 Deauthorized Projects 52. Deauthorized Projects ........................... 1-27 General Investigations 53. Surveys ....................................................... 1-27 54. Collection and Study of Basic Data............1-27 55. Planning, Engineering and Design ............ 1-27 56. Preconstruction Engineering and D esign .......................... ............................. 1-27 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 1-28 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ................... 1-37 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 1-44 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................. 1-48 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 1-49 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ... 1-51 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ..................... 1-52 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ........................ 1-54 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ........................ 1-54 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ...................... 1-55 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin .................... 1-55 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin...................1-56 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin .................... 1-58 Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin ................... 1-59 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin ......................... 1-60 Table 1-P Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................ 1-61 1-2 Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MA 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MA Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of Harwich, MA, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west sides of harbor entrance, and three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. Eastjetty completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of westjetty was completed in May 1973. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from July 8-14, 1993 at a rental cost of $59,500. Approximately 14,505 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed ofnearshore offNeal Road. Hired labor costs of $23,700 were incurred for performing pre- and afterdredge surveys and progress surveys. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Divisionjurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical information was provided to local interests on specific aquatic weed problems. These problems included nuisance growth of aquatic vegetation in the Charles River and several lakes. Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 ofAnnual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; along with widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Formal assurances for new work have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, currently estimated at $7,970,000; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas), currently estimated at $2,305,000; relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated at $980,000; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries, currently estimated at $2,450,000. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued preconstruction engineering and design activities including ship simulation studies and preparation of the Design Memorandum. Maintenance: Hired labor costs Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 of $31,000 were incurred for continued work on an Environmental Impact Statement for maintenance dredging in association with a proposed improvement project. 4. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major reha.- bilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for emergency shoreline protection at Wings Neck, Bourne was awarded in July 1992. Work began in August 1992 and was completed in June 1993. Final contract amount was $232,973. A continuing contract to paint the Bourne highway bridge was awarded in September 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was completed in September 1993. Contractor earnings were $2,024,333 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Other FY 1993 maintenance costs were: operation and maintenance of Buzzards Bay railroad bridge $329,985. Other FY 1993 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: vessel traffic control activities $1,465,257; maintenance ofbuildings, grounds and utilities $1,124,498; operation and maintenance of project recreational facilities $609,002; project administration facilities $272,046; project utilities $166,805; maintenance of roads and bridges $155,990; periodic inspections $130,292; engineering and design $31,408; contract supervision and administration $23,141 and $47,943 for real estate activities. 5. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI, at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel ten feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely: Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain eight-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredgingin 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. Anew ten-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the 10-foot entrance channel by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from June 24 to July 7, 1993 at a rental cost of $119,000. Approximately 41,595 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off Harding Beach. Hired labor costs of $22,500 were incurred for performing pre-and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 6. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 and 12377.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each river town, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs associated with a proposed maintenance dredging project were $14,000 for preparation of plans and specifications, and $3,200 for sampling and testing. North Cove - Work under a continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the channel and anchorages which commenced last fiscal year and was stopped due to an environmental restriction was completed in December 1992. Approximately 71,300 cubic yards of material were removed this fiscal year and disposed of at the Cornfield Shoals disposal site in Long Island Sound for a total of 152,292 cubic yards under the contract. Contract earnings this fiscal year were $286,252 bringing the total contract cost to $608,124. Earnings this fiscal year on a disposal inspection contract associated with the dredging were $11,000. Hired labor costs included $32,900 for supervison and inspection, $600 for contract administration, and $12,800 for performning and plotting after-dredge surveys. 7. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA Location. At eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south of New Bedford Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. A channel generally 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from outer harbor to westerly terminal in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet; an anchorage in inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, and 800 feet wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. Existing project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Disposal areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 feet, are open to public use. Limited mechanical-handling facilities are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Adjustment of $6,191 for rental costs of Government owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was made for dredging completed lastfiscal year. Final rental costs were $68,809. 8. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. Provides for channel six feet deep (eight feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; five-acre anchorage near Town Pier, six feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200-foot extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising eastjetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 15 to June 23, 1993 at a rental cost of $328,000. Approximately 51,800 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of nearshore off Green Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs of $58,300 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 9. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north side of Long Island Sound about 13 miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12354.) Existing project. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the harbor from Long Island Sound to an anchorage basin in East River, length 0.8 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 mile, a channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide up Sluice Creek 880 feet to Whitfield Street; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide in East River, length 1,500 feet. Mean and spring tidal ranges are 5.4 and 6.4 feet, respectively. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in April 1957. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. State wharf about 370 feet long provides adequate facilities for existing commerce. Town wharf on north bank of East River at foot of Whitfield Street is no longer usable. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work under a continuing contract for maintenance dredging awarded at the end of last fiscal year commenced in November 1992. Due to weather conditions and equipment failure, work could not be completed as scheduled and was stopped due to environmental restrictions. About 10,000 cubic yards of material were removed and placed in a nearby upland site at a contract cost of $237,300. Hired labor costs included $35,000 for supervision and inspection, $900 for contract administration, and $35,300 for performing and plottingpre- and after-dredge surveys. 10. HARBOR OF REFUGE BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On east side of Block Island, near south end of inner curve of shoreline 13 miles south-southwest from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Completed in 1916 except for inactive portion. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both steel sheet pile bulkhead which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf owned by town and open to public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in harbor. There is limited room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for emergency maintenance dredging of the 15- foot entrance channel was awarded in December 1992. Work was performed by mechanical dredge during January 1993. Approximately 13,864 cubic yards of material were removed at a contract cost of $157,048. The material was placed nearshore off Crescent Beach. Hired labor costs included $3,100 for preparation of plans and specifications, $12,500 for supervision and inspection, $700 for contract administration, and $10,500 for pre- and after-dredge surveys. Also, hired labor costs in the amount of $9,800 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications in association with a proposed breakwater repair project. 11. JOSIAS RIVER, MAINE Location. A small river running through Flat Pond to Perkins Cove, which is the harbor for Ogunquit, a village on coast of Maine 30 miles southwest of Portland. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. Completed work consists of a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide in Josias River from that depth in Perkins Cove to and including anchorage basis of same depth and about 4.2 acres in area in Flat Pond. Project was completed in March 1960. New work involves deepening the existing 900 foot Federal channel and 2.1 acres of the anchorage area to 7 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for the Section 107 modification was executed on February 8, 1993 between the Corps and the Town of Ogunquit, Maine. The local sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all utility relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for the construction and later maintenance of the project; pay 10 percent of project costs for commercial navigation during construction, curently estimated at $18,000; pay 50 percent of project costs of recreational navigation during construction; currently estimated at $68,000; reimburse the Federal Government an additional 10 percent of project costs for commercial navigation within the 30- year period following completion of construction currently estimated at $18,000; provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; and bear all costs for operation and maintenance of project features allocated to recreational navigation. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves in the harbor, all owned by the Ogunquit Village Corporation and open to the public free of charge. Three of these wharves are in Flat Pond and Perkins Cove. The village corporation also erected a pile-and-timber bulkhead backed with earthfill, on the northerly shore of the river. The easterly end of this bulkhead is about 300 feet below the footbridge from which point it extends 490 feet along the northerly bank of the river into Flat Pond. A marine railway capable of handling boats up to 50 feet long is immediately east of the bulkhead. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging along the Josias River was awarded February 10, 1993. Work was delayed until next fiscal year due to environmental restrictions and to avoid the recreation season. Maintenance: Provisions for maintenance dredging are included in the contract awarded February 10, 1993 and similarly this work has been delayed until next fiscal year. Hired labor costs incurred were $2,800 for supervision and $1,000 for contract administration. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 12. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12371.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Amain channel 35 feet deep, 400 to 800 feet wide, from Long Island Sound to Tomlinson Bridge; two anchorage basins below Tomlinson Bridge of 16 and 15-foot depths; a pile-and-riprap dike about 4,200 feet long, to contract tidal flow at Fort Hale Bar; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 to 150 feet wide, from southwest corner of 16-foot anchorage basin via City Point and West Haven Wharf front to Kimberly Avenue Bridge; thence 12 feet deep and prevailing width of 75 feet up West River to about 600 feet upstream of Kimberly Avenue Bridge, and an anchorage basin six feet deep in West River oppositeMars Wharf; a channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from 15-foot anchorage basin toward Brewery Street, about 300 feet; a channel in Quinnipiac River 22 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide to a point about 1,000 feet above Ferry Street, thence 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Grand Avenue, with turning basin 22 feet deep, 200 to 800 feet wide, and 700 feet long at mouth of Mill River; a channel up Mill River 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide to junction of two branches above Chapel Street, thence to Grand Avenue, 100 feet wide in East Branch and generally 125 feet wide in West Branch; and removal of certain obstructive rocks in Morris Cove. Existing project was completed in 1961. The 22-foot channel and turning basin is to be restudied. Estimated cost (1960) of this portion is $980,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 24 waterfront facilities; most are within city limits of New Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of City Wharf and U.S. Coast Guard Wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Some of the facilities have rail connections and all are accessible by paved streets. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Ports of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the main ship channel was awarded 7 September 1993. Contractor earnings at fiscal year end were $175,000 for mobilization. Dredging is to commence in October 1993 with disposal at the Central Long Island Sound Disposal Site. Hired labor costs included $7,300 for preparation of plans and specifications, $5,000 for supervision and inspection; $21,600 for performing and plotting predredge surveys, and $2,000 for contract administration. 13. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13282.) Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence nine feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Existing project was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outerharbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in thesejetties completed in Septemver 1970. Plum Island Basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along a frontage of the south bank of Merrimack Rier below highway bridge and one town pier and four marinas on the north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for exisiting commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by commercial hopper dredge was performed from April 26 to May 10, 1993 at a contract cost of $365,107. Approximately 125,040 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of in the nearshore zone of Plum Island. Hired labor costs included $10,400 for preparation of plans and specifications, $8,900 for supervision and inspection, $32,500 for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys, and $1,400 for contract administration. 14. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI Location. Point Judith marks the southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, lying inland of the beach, with a length north and south of about four miles. A small artificial opening through the beach and sand dunes connects this pond to the ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of steel sheet pile bulkhead construction which comprises southern and eastern limits ofbasin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two State piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a bulkhead with 15 finger piers provides berthing space of about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of fish and fish products. Mechanical handling facilities including fish pumps, are available for discharge of cargo. In addition, there are approximately ten small privately owned wharves used in the fishing business and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for exisiting commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs in the amount of $2,803 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for a proposed breakwater repair project. 15. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, MA and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Gangway Rock, southwest point of Badgers Island and Boiling Rock to 35 feet deep; widening 35-foot channel at bends by removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Henderson Point, Gangway Rock, Badgers Island, Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge and Boiling Rock; and extending channel from above Boiling Rock to a point about 1,700 feet above Atlantic Terminal Sales dock in Newington generally 400 feet wide, and 35 feet deep below mean low water with maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project; channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from Little Harbor through Rye-New Castle drawbridge, then northerly between mainland and Leach's Island to deep water in vicinity of Shapleigh and Goat Islands, channel 75 feet wide six feet deep up Sagamore Creek to public landing on downstream side of Sagamore Avenue bridge and anchorage strip, six feet deep, 75 feet wide, totalling three acres, adjacent to channel in Sagamore Creek. Public Law 86- 645, Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended in 1965 and by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 authorized construction of the six-foot channels and anchorages. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: widening of the 35-foot deep channel from 600 feet to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widening northern limit of 35- foot deep channel adjacent to Badgers Island by 100 feet; and widening southern limit of existing 35-foot deep channel at Goat Island from 400 to 550 feet. This work was completed in Aprl 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Local interests must reimburse $1,732,013.71 within the 30-year period following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. Waterfront terminals are chiefly on south bank of Piscataqua River in Portsmouth and Newington. U.S. Navy Yard is on opposite bank at Kittery, ME. Eighteen piers, wharves, and landings represent available terminals for handling the port's waterborne commerce. Navy Yard is not used for commercial activities. On Maine side of river are a town landing and two docks. On New Hampshire side there are 13 terminals, six of which include a public landing, two docks, three facilities used for vessel mooring and landings, are at Portsmouth. In addition there are a number of private recreational boat docks. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport and Portland, ME, and Portsmouth, NH.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for widening the channel adjacent to Goat Island was awarded October 4, 1991. Work began in December 1991 and was completed in April 1992. Final contract amount was $2,790,051. Maintenance: Amaintenance dredging contract was awarded in November 1991. Work began on December 11 and was completed on December 15, 1991. Final contract amount was $88,975. Approximately 20,100 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at a riverine disposal site about 3,000 feet downstream from the dredging area. 16. SACO RIVER, ME Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 miles southwest of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13287.) Existing project. For description of completed existing portion of project see Annual Report for 1978. For a description of completed improvement of project see Annual Report for 1983. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river used for summer passenger business. Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Work on entrance channel and downstream anchorage areas under a maintenance dredging contract was awarded in July 1992, commenced in October 1992 and terminated for default in March 1993. About 27,000 cubic yards of sand were dredged at a cost of $210,000 prior to the termination. The bonding company is soliciting bids to complete the work after September 1993 due to environmental restrictions. Hired labor costs included $73,700 for supervision and inspection, $100,000 for contract administration, and $38,000 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys. 17. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR AND THE POOL AT BIDDEFORD, ME Location. This harbor is situated at the southern end of Saco Bay, ME, immediately south of the mouth of the Saco River. It is 20 miles southwest of Portland, ME, and 30 miles northeast of Portsmouth, NH. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in the Pool 6 feet deep, approximately 9.7 acres in extent, and three icebreakers south of Fishermen's Wharf. This work was completed in 1956. New work provides for a navigation channel from deep water in Wood Island Harbor to a point just inside the gut at Biddeford Pool. The channel is approximately 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. This work was completed in 1992. (See Table 1-B at end ofchapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on February 5, 1992 between the Corps and the city of Biddeford, ME for new work. The local sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; perform all alterations and relocations of facilities and utilities determined by the Government to be necesary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to ten percent of total project costs; and repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional ten percent of total project costs, partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the harbor. Three are of pile and timber, and the other two are solid-fill construction. One wharf is used for the receipt of seafood, two are used in connection with a yacht club, and the remaining two are private. There is no public-owned wharf but one of the wharves is open to the public free of charge. None of the wharves have railroad connections. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for improvement dredging at Wood Island Harbor was awarded March 5, 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was completed the following month. To date, the contractor has received $194,055 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 18. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter.) 20. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-IH at end of chapter.) Alterations of Bridges 21. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 22. PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT Location. The city of West Haven is located in southcentral Connecticut along the northern shore of Long Island Sound about 90 miles northeast of New York City. Prospect Beach is located in West Haven between Seal Bluff Beach and Oyster River Point. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the amount of 30 percent of the first cost of widening 6,000 feet of shoreline to a 100-150 foot width by direct placement of sand, starting about 350 feet south of South Street and extendig northerly to Ivy Street; and construction of eight impermeable groins varying from 250 to 330 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in May 1957. (For details see Annual Report for 1958). New work provides for beach widening by the direct placement of suitable sandfill along 4,300 feet of shore front between Ivy Street and the groin structure just south of Tyler Avenue to form a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 12.0 feet mean low water and a dry 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 beach width of approximately 137 feet above mean high water. New work also includes periodic beach nourishment as required over the 50-year economic life of the Sproject. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on October 19, 1992 between the Corps and the city of West Haven, Connecticut for the new work. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for initial construction and future nourishment of the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost to construct the project, currently estimated at $785,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic beach nourishment cost for the 50-year economic life of the project, currently estimated at $623,000; assume all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, currently estimated at $807,000; assure continued public ownership of the beach and its administration for public use for 50 years; assume all costs for the operation, maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the project after completion; control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and if necessary provide drainage to divert fresh water runoff away from the beach. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of shore protection and erosion control measures at Prospect Beach was awarded October 29, 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 72 percent complete by the end of May 1993 when work was stopped due to environmental restrictions. At fiscal year end contractor earnings totaled $1,283,573. Work is scheduled to be completed next fiscal year. 23. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, MA, approximately seven miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor, and six miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle.) Existing project. Placement of sandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50-foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach extends approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high water line. Initial fill was completed in June 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances were executed on May 31, 1990 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), local interests are required to: contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $3,605,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 50 years, now estimated at $22,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 50 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction ofthe project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The Operation and Maintenance Manual was in the process of being prepared in coordination with the MDC. 24. ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK, LUBEC, ME Location. The Roosevelt Campobello International Park is located on the southeast end of Campobello Island. The island is politically part of New Brunswick, Canada, and is separated from Lubec, ME, by the Lubec Narrows and connected by FDR Memorial Bridge. It is approximately 120 miles east of Bangor, ME. Existing project. Stone slope revetment to provide shoreline protection for the lighthouse at Mulholland Point. The stone protection extends 375 feet around the point at a height of about 10 feet and ties into stable ground at either end of the project. The upper slope, above the stone protection, is graded and seeded. Project was completed March 1989. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; and maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The Operation and Maintenance Manual was completed and copies forwarded to the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission. 25. SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. Southeast Lighthouse is located atop a 150-foot bluff on the southeast tip of Block Island in the town of New Shoreham, RI. The lighthouse was first illuminated in 1875 and has been a popular tourist attraction for over a century. It is the highest lighthouse 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION in New England, visible from 35 miles at sea, and its 237,000 candle power is the strongest on the Atlantic coast. Existing project. Provides for all work necessary to relocate Southeast Lighthouse and the attached dwelling some 245 feet away from the eroding bluff. (SeeTable I-B at end ofchapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on April 5, 1992 between the Corps, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and the Southeast Lighthouse Foundation. This agreement was modified on 21 January 1993 to reflect amended cost-sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, which limits non- Federal costs to $970,000. Local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide 50 percent of project costs for relocating Southeast Lighthouse up to the non-Federal statutory limit of $970,000; and bear all costs for operation and maintenance of the,, lighthouse after project completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A competitive services contract for the relocation of Southeast Lighthouse was awarded 12 February 1993. Work began in March 1993 and was 84 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $1,720,000. 26. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont, city of Milford about five miles southwest of New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement of those portions of the shore which are publicly owned by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width of 100-150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report for 1961.) New work provides for the direct placement of sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet ofbeach between Clinton and Bonsilene Streets to form a berm 50 feet wide. Reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels lost as a result of sand placement. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the city of Milford, CT for the new work. The local sponsor must provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-ofway for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost to construct the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic beach nourishment cost and 100 percent of the groin maintenance cost for the 50-year economic life of the project; assume all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; assure continued public ownership of the beach and its administration for public use for 50 years; control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and if necessary provide a drainage system to divert freshwater runoff away from the beach. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of shore protection and erosion control measures at Woodmont Beach was awarded August 21, 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 42 percent complete by the end of May 1993 when work was stopped due to environmental restrictions. At fiscal year end contractor carnings totaled $377,522. Work is scheduled to be completed next fiscal year. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1993. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 29. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter.) Flood Control 30. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 30A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast ofUxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to provide downstream slope protection was awarded March 19, 1993. Work began in May 1993 and was completed in August 1993. Final contract amount was $48,920. 31. BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER, SWANSEA, MA Location. The town of Swansea is located in southeastern Massachusetts about 12 miles east of Providence, Rhode Island. The Bluffs Community Center is located on Ocean Grove Beach in the town of Swansea. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of 300 feet of rock revetment along the seaward side of the Bluffs Community Center to protect it from wave attack. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 9, 1993 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent oftotal project costs during construction; currently estimated at $11,050; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of approximately 20 percent, currently estimated at $43,950, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection measures along Ocean Grove Beach was awarded August 18, 1993. Work had not started by fiscal year end. 32. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,152,853 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration, were $131,478. In addition $6,562 was expended on a fish and wildlife management contract. 33. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, Nil, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of ten reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control offloods and other purposes as set forth in House in Connecticut River Valley, Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir,, projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch ofWestfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT, Conway, MA, Milford, CT, Simsbury, CT authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (SeeTable 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control offlood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in February 1993. 33A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of fish passage facilities at Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes on the West River was awarded in May 1992. Work at Ball Mountain Lake involves automation of the center gate to regulate the spring pool elevation for downstream passage ofjuvenile salmon. Work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. To date the contractor has received $577,208, of which $35,000 is for work at Ball Mountain Lake. Final contract payment was still pending at fiscal year end. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint the service gates at two projects was awarded in June 1992. Work began in May 1993 and was 50 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $30,455. A contract to repair and paint the service bridge was awarded 15 April 1993. Work began in June 1993 and was completed the following month. To date the contractor has received $67,739 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 33B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for addition to the Water Quality Laboratory was awarded in April 1992 and work was completed in December 1992. Final contract amount was $92,925. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Electrical work at Barre Falls Dam was completed in July 1993 at a cost of $6,900. The overall contract was 85 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $91,615. 33C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-Nil and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Electrical work at Birch Hill Dam owvaesr aclol mcpolnettreadc ti nw aJsu l8y5 1p9e9r3c eantt a cost of $16,100. The complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $91,615. A contract to repair the New Boston Road bridge was awarded in August 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was completed during the following month. Final contract amount was $18,187. 33D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint Old Route 8 Bridge was awarded 15 March 1993. Work began in June 1993 and was completed later that month. Final contract amount was $71,929. A contract to replace cables to the intake tower was awarded 30 Septemver 1993. Work had not begun by the end of the fiscal year. 33E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for stone protection repair at two dams was awarded 25 January 1993. Work began in July 1993 and was completed that month. Final contract amount was $54,382, of which $9,987 was for repairs at Conant Brook Dam. 33F. CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT Location. The city of Middletown is located in Middlesex County, in the lower Connecticut Valley, in south-central Connecticut. Middletown is approximately 15 miles south of Hartford, CT and 20 miles north of New Haven, CT. Existing project. The project is located along the Connecticut River in the vicinity of River Road at the intersection with Eastern Drive, approximately 6,500 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION feet downstream of the Arrigoni (Route 66) Bridge. The project consists of 500 linear feet of 6-inch concrete paving block protection underlain by a 1-foot layer of gravel bedding and riprap toe protection along River Road. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on February 13, 1992 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of project costs to 25 percent (a minimun cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work. A contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along the Connecticut River was awarded 9 November 1992. Work began in August 1993 and was 47 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor payments of $94,022. 33G. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES FOR TOWNSHEND AND BALL MOUNTAIN LAKES, WEST RIVER, VT Location. The West River watershed is located in southern Vermont. Townshend Lake dam is located on the West River about 19.5 miles above its confluence with the Connecticut River. Ball Mountain Lake dam is situated on the West River approximately 9.5 miles upstream of Townshend Lake and 29 miles upstream of the Connecticut River. Existing project. Construct a fish barrier and fish holding structure 300 feet downstream of Townshend Lake, modifications to the Townshend outlet structure, automation of the gate controls at Ball Mountain Lake, and procurement of a fish transport tank (truckmountable for depositing fish). Work was completed in February 1993. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on May 4, 1992, between the Corps and the State of Vermont. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the Government, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; and hold and save the Government free from damages arising from the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for the construction of fish passage facilities at Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams was awarded on May 12, 1992. Work began during June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Contractor earnings total $577,208 to date, with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 33H. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT Location. The town of Simsbury is located in the central portion of Hartford County in north-central Connecticut, approximately 25 miles east of the New York- Connecticut state line and 14 miles northwest of the city of Hartford, CT. Existing project. The proposed project includes concrete grid block and stone slope protection along 900 feet of eroding Farmington River streambank. The project will protect the river bank and an adjacent three-foot diameter sewer trunk line. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed 19 February 1993 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide during the period of construction a minimum cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated at $26,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 17.6 percent, presently estimated at $91,000, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection meausres along the Farmington River was awarded 16 July 1993. The contractor began work on the administrative phase of the contract but had not mobilized by fiscal year end. 33I. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on the contract for installation ofsafety fencing, completed during fiscal year 1991, was still pending at fiscal year end. A contract to repair concrete spillway weir/retaining wall was awarded in May 1992 and completed in June 1993. To date the contractor has received $324,877 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 85 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contractor earnings totaled $91,615, of which $8,900 was for work at Knightville Dam. A contract to repair the service bridge deck was awarded 16 March 1993. Work began in June 1993 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $24,321. 33J. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 85 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contractor earnings totaled $91,615, of which $24,800 was for work at Littleville Lake. A contract to paint flood gates was awarded 12 March 1993. Work began in June 1993 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $16,560. 33K. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs was awarded in September 1991 and completed in July 1992. Final contract amount was $102,484. A contract to replace aboveground fuel tank and service bridge was awarded 19 April 1993. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 33L. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $409,645. 33M. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from itsjunction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to paint service bridge and remove fuel tank was awarded 4 August 1993. The contractor had begun work on the administrative phase of the contract by fiscal year end. 33N. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in southwestern Massachusetts on the west bank of the Connecticut River, about 90 miles west of Boston, MA and 135 miles northwest of New York City. Riverdale is in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield, MA. 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. The project involved the construction of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log structures. The project, with the approved plan of upstream reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941. Construction of this work was initiated in April 1949 and completed in December 1950. (For details see Annual Report for 1950.) A plan of improvement authorized in 1987 calls for the expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes adding a 24-inch diesel powered pump into the existing station. The proposed project also includes jacking a separate 5-foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert to increase the gravity outflow capacity. The new gravity,, conduit will be equipped with an ungated inlet and an outlet structure which includes a 60" x 6" self contained, electronically operated sluice gate. During emergencies, the gate could be operated manually from a new bridge and tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing nine-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned eight-foot x 13-foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is $1,060,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 16, 1992 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management for new work. The local sponsor shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and rehabilitating the project after construction; provide during the period of construction a minimum cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated to be $53,000; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways and sewers determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated to be $50,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 15 percent, presently estimated at $162,000, so that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords, or that would hinder operation and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $5 million. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project plans and specifications were updated. Continued coordination with the local sponsor to assist in the acquisition of required real estate. 330. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $356,547. 33P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of fish passage facilities at Ball Mountain and Townshend Lakes on the West River was awarded in May 1992. Work at Townshend Lake was completed during February and involved the construction of a fish trap facility approximately 300 feet downstream of the dam and construction of a plunge pool just downstream of the overflow weir. Earnings to date were $577,208 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to paint the service gates at two projects was awarded in June 1992. Work began in May 1993 and was about 50 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $30,455. 33Q. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north ofAthol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed im- 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 provement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 85 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contractor earnings totaled $91,615, of which $4,400 was for work at Tully Lake. 33R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded 17 July 1992. Work began in December 1992 and was 85 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contractor earnings totaled $91,615, of which $16,715 was for work at Union Village Dam. A contract to replace guard rails was awarded 28 July 1992. Work began in April 1993 and was completed in May 1993. Total contract amount was $59,837. 34. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-M on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 34A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $231,061. 34B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $106,116. 34C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns ofMiddlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence ofNaugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in June 1991 for remedial repairs was completed in August 1992. Final contract amount was $902,904. A contract awarded in September 1991 for construction of a restroom was completed in June 1993. To date the contractor has received $158,614 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 34D. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to renovate the beach area restroom was awarded in May 1992 and completed in February 1993. To date the contractorhas received $47,225 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. A contract awarded last fiscal year for construction of a picnic area restroom was completed in February 1993. To date the contractor has received $108,539 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Another contract was awarded 17 June 1993 for installation of a septic system for the beach area restroom. Work began in Septemer 1993 and was 12 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $5,000. 34E. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $410,791. 35. MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIASPORT, ME Location. The town of Machiasport is located along the northeast coast of Maine approximately 70 miles southeast of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of stone slope protection along 380 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to State Highway Route 92. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 29, 1993 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rightsof- way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, currrently estimated at $3,300; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent oftotal project costs during construction, currently estimated at $8,665; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of approximately 18.1 percent, currently estimated at $31,335, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along Machias River was awarded September 21, 1993. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 36. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units ofcomprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction ofSaxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 36A. BLACKWVATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year to clean and paint the service and emergency gates was completed in October 1992. Final contract amount was $99,119. A contract to rehab hydraulic system was awarded 18 August 1993. Work had not started by the end of the fiscal year. 36B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, Nil, and 14 miles east of Keene, Ni. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $386,073. 36C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NHi.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for deleading and repainting the service bridge awarded 4 April 1992 was terminated on 18 May 1993 for default. Office of Counsel has contacted the bonding company and negotiations are ongoing. Another contract for conduit repairs awarded in May 1992 was completed in September 1992. Final contract amount was $214,378. A contract to rehab the Knox Brook bridge was awarded in July 1992 and completed in December 1992. Final contract amount was $43,697. 36D. IIOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook 17.3 miles above its junction River, with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of EastWeare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed impproorvt efmore n1t9 7a5n. d authorizing legislation see Annual Re- Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded during fiscal year 1991 to repair Dike P-1 was completed in September1992. Final contract amount was $311,332. A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs was awarded June 19,1992 and was completed in October 1992. Final contract amount was $28,646. A contract to rehab Choate Brook Bridge was awarded 12 April 1993. Work began in May 1993 and was completed in August 1993. Final contract amount was $52,407. A contract to replace the sluice gate at the south weir was awarded 20 May 1993. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 36E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA Location. The city of Leominster is located in northcentral Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest of Boston. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of stone slope revetment along 400 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to the Leominster Connector, an arterial roadway that links the interstate highway network with the city. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 1, 1993 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Highway Department. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction, currently estimated at $10,500; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of20 percent, currently estimated at $42,000, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along the North Nashua River was awarded September 20, 1993. Work had not started by fiscal year end. 37. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, MILBRIDGE, ME Location. The town of Milbridge is located along the northeast coast of Maine approximately 50 miles southeast of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of stone slope protection along 100 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to U.S. Route 1A. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 29, 1993 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsor must proivde all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, currently estimated at $1,000; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction, currently estimated at $6,000; pay an additional cash contribution during construction of approximately 19.2 percent, currently estimated at $23,000, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work. A continuing contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures along Narraguagus River was awarded September 21, 1993. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 38. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded last fiscal year for miscellaneous concrete repairs was completed in November 1992. Final contract amount was $54, 911. A contract for roof repairs was awarded in June 1992 and completed in November 1992. Final contract amount was $21,121. Operating costs included $117,400 for project operations; $26,106 for administration; $30,100 for engineering and design; $7,400 for contract supervision and inspection. The cost of maintenance work accomplished by contract included $34,000 for miscellaneous concrete repairs. 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 39. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME Location. The town of Fort Kent is located in Aroostook County in northern Maine, about 50 miles northwest of Presque Isle, Maine, and adjacent to the United States/ SCanada border. Perley Brook is a tributary of the Fish River. Existing project. The project includes stone revetment along 100 linear feet of eroding embankment adjacent to Route 161, excavation of four river shoals, and placement of gabions around existing highway culverts. Work was completed in August 1989. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on 24 April 1988 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsor provided all lands, easements, rights-ofway, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and performed all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction, at an actual cost of $3,109; payed $20,554 so that total contributions including lands equalled 25 percent of total project costs; and has assumed maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final project costs were apportioned between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. 40. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes, which lie below elevation ten feet NGVD. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" protection by constructing an earth berm one foot high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road and a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. The total estimated project cost (October 1993) is $12,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material presently estimated at $880,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements, presently estimated at $25,000 annually; pay an amount in cash, presently estimated at $3,950,000, to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction; provide and maintain necessary access roads; and accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations ofbuildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, highway bridges, and other structures necessary for construction of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications continued and the Project Management Plan was approved. 41. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA Location. The communities of Revere, Saugus, Malden and Lynn are located along the Massachusetts coastline just north of Boston. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of a 1,300 foot long floodgate structure across the mouth of the Saugus River and construction of 3.5 miles of dikes, walls, revetments, sand dunes and beaches along the Revere and Lynn shorefronts. Included with the proposed project is the acquisition, protection and management of 1,650 acres of salt water estuary along the Saugus and Pines Rivers for flood water storage. A mitigation site is planned at the abandoned 1-95 embankment to replace 3 acres of clam flats and tidal habitat lost by project construction. Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations necessary for project construction, currently estimated at $9,500,000; pay approximately 26 percent of the first costs allocated to hurricane and storm damage reduction, currently estimated at $30,225,000; to bring the total non-Federal share of hurricane and storm damage reduction costs to 35 percent; pay 100 percent of the separable costs allocated to recreation, currently estimated at $1,500,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of project facilities after construction, currently estimated at $270,000 annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The project sponsor indicated by letter dated 31 August 1993 that they intend to investigate a non-structural approach to flood protection as an alternative to the proposed project. Further efforts on the General Design tReport were suspended in September 1993 pending the results of the sponsor's investigation. 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 42. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City, and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the roof was awarded in July 1992. Work began in January 1993 and was completed in March 1993. Final contract amount was $103,722. 43. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 43A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to renovate the recreation area restroom was awarded in June 1992. Work began in October 1992 and was 85 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $43,120. A contract to install a septic system for the recreation area restroom was awarded 16 June 1993. Work had not begun by the end of the fiscal year. 43B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in fiscal year 1991 to replace weir gates and repair/repaint service gates was completed in August 1992. Final contract amount was $79,505. A contract for stone protection repair at two dams was awarded 25 January 1993. Work began in July 1993 and was completed later that month. Final contract amount was $54,382, of which $44,395 was for repairs at East Brimfield Lake. 43C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in fiscal year 1991 to paint the service gates was completed in July 1992. Final contract amount was $45,844. A contract for emergency remedial repairs was awarded 15 June 1993 and work was completed in 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 August 1993. Earnings to date were $336,592 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 43D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint the service gates was awarded in March 1992 and completed in January 1993. Final contract was $51,928. A contract to replace underground fuel tanks was awarded 23 March 1993. Work had not begun by fiscal year end. 43E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase ofrecreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to paint service gates was awarded 15 March 1993. Work began in July 1993 and was completed the following month. To date the contractor has received $72,333 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. 43F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $319,290. 44. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1993) is $40,000,000, and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety measures at Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, which are a non- Federal responsibility. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, presently estimated at $830,000; reconstruct Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $4,600,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $3,070,000; so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $40,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction ofTown River improvements in Decewmabs earw arded on September 30, 1992. Work began 1992 and was 75 percent complete at fiscal year end with contractor earnings of $2,463,594. A second continuing contract for construction of the tunnel was awarded 15 Septeber 1993. Work on this contract had not started by the end of the fiscal year. 45. TOWN RIVER BAY, QUINCY, MA Location. The city of Quincy is located in Norfolk 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION County in eastern Massachusetts, approximately five miles north of Braintree, MA and ten miles southeast of Boston, MA. Quincy is bordered by Milton, MA to the west, Weymouth, MA to the south, and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. Existing project. Construct a stone revetment approximately 280 feet long and 15 feet high along an eroding section of Town River Bay shoreline. The project will protect a subsidized housing structure situated about ten feet from the top edge of the eroding shoreline. Project was completed in June 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on December 31, 1990 between the Corps and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (DEM) for the project. Local interests furnished all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas; accomplished all alterations and relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for construction; payed $18,409 during construction so that total contributions including lands equalled 25 percent of total project costs; and have assumed maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: An Operation and Maintenance Manual was completed and final project costs were apportioned between Federal and non-Federal accounts. 46. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT Location. New Haven, CT is located in southern New Haven County, about 35 miles south of Hartford, CT. The project area is located upstream of the intersection of Route 63 and West River in northwestern New Haven. Existing project. The West River was widened for 1,150 feet from its existing 25- to 30-foot width to a 50- to 70-foot width; a 1,150-foot modular wall was built along the right bank and a 600-foot cantilever sheet pile wall was built along the left bank. For Wintergreen Brook the channel has a 20- to 30-foot width, and a 550-foot sheet pile wall and 450-foot dike on the right bank. A recreational walkway on top of the modular wall with lighting and fencing to connect two existing city parks is also included. Project was completed in December 1992. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on January 17, 1989 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations, presently estimated at $1,700,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at five percent or $291,000 so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; pay 50 percent of the costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated to be $140,000; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after completion. In addition, local interests must do the following: participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on the project which would reduce the level of protection afforded; notify, not less than once a year, affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract awarded during fiscal year 1990 for construction of the project was completed in December 1992. Earnings to date total $3,553,818 with final contract payment pending at fiscal year end. 47. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: April 93 - East Branch, East Hartford, Hall Meadow, Hartford, Mad River, New London, Norwalk, Pawcatuck, Stamford, Sucker Brook, Waterbury, Wethersfield; May 93- Ansonia, Bridgeport, Colchester, Danbury, Derby, East Hampton, Milford, North Canaan, North Fairfield, Salisbury, Torrington, Winsted, Woodbury. MAINE: May 93 - Ogunquit; June 93 - Beals, Belfast, Blaine, Campobello Island, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Indian Island, Islesboro, Lubec, Machias, Perley Brook, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: April 93- Blackstone, Conway, Fitchburg, Haywood Creek/Braintree, Holyoke, Huntington, Lancaster, Millbury, Quincy, Quincy (Island Avenue), Quincy (Town River Bay), Three Rivers, Ware, Westfield, West Warren, Weymouth/Braintree, Worcester; May 93 - Alford, Amesbury, Canton, Charles River Dam, Chicopee, Gardner, Haverhill, Lee, Lowell, Northampton, Pittsfield, Saxonville, Scituate, Sheffield (covered bridge), Sheffield (state maintenance), Springfield, West Springfield. NEW HAMPSHIRE: April 93 - Charlestown, North Stratford, West Stewartstown, Wilton; May 93 - Farmington, Keene, Lincoln, Nashua, Shelbourne. RHODE ISLAND: April 93 - Burrillville; May 93 - Woonsocket.. VERMONT: April 93 - Brownsville, Saxtons River, Weston. 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 48. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of which have flood control as primary storage available with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storages in most of the projects, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During fiscal year 1993 there was a significant flood event during the March and April snowmelt period. The winter was characterized by several winter storms, resulting in near record snowpack levels within some New England watersheds. During the snowmelt period at the end of March, a widespread rainfall of 1 to 2 inches was deposited over most of New England. The combination of rainfall and snowmelt produced flooding throughout most of New England with the Connecticut and Merrimack Rivers c resting just over flood stage. About one week later an additional 1 to 2 inches of rain, along with the remaining snowmelt from northern areas, resulted in the Connecticut and Merrimack Rivers rising again to near flood stage. Storage utilized beind NED dams varied widely from about 5 to 50 percent. Damages prevented from all flood control reservoir operations during this event amounted to about $52 million. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain and Townshend - April and September 1993; Otter Brook - March 1993; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville - April 1993; Surry Mountain -May 1993. Non-flood releases from Colebrook Lake were made throughout fiscal year 1993 for hydropower generation, as required by the Hartford MDC. Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake were controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower throughout fiscal year 1993. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in April and May 1993. THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation activities in the basin included releases for canoe races at Mansfield Hollow in June 1993 and at East Brimfield and Westville Lakes in April 1993. East Brimfield and Westville Lakes were also regulated a week for low flow augmentation during late August 1993. The permanent pool at West Thompson was raised on ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 several occasions to accommodate the American Kennel Club (AKC) retriever trials. 49. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MAbarriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on 12 occasions for coastal storms during fiscal year 1993. On 11 December 1992 the barrier was operated for the highest tide since completion in 1969. Damages prevented during this event amounted to $9.1 million. Total benefits associated with gate operations during fiscal year 1993 totalled $9.5 million. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During fiscal year 1993, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 19 different occasions resulting in a total of $177,000 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1993 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1993 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER.TheNew London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1993 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. 50. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 51. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Law Public 858,80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J at end of chapter.) 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Quaboag River, Brookfield, MA Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Chelsea Creek, East Boston, MA Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME Mattabassett River, Berlin, CT North Nashua River (Sewer Line), MA Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA Sheepscot River, Alna, ME Sylvia State Beach, Oak Bluffs, MA Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT $ 2,456 26,834 9,000 51,896 4,924 32,349 100,862 39,907 Fish passage facilities (Section 872 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act.) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Townshend & Ball Mountain Lakes, VT $302,771 Emergency flood control activities--repair,f lood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year were $246,066 for disaster preparedness. Deauthorized Projects 52. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) General Investigations 53. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $1,171,459 of which $140,462 was for three navigation studies; $173,424 for two flood damage prevention studies; $193,212 for two special studies; $194,793 for one comprehensive study; and $469,568 for coordination studies. 54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on the Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections $435 are made ofconditions on the Saint Croix River and basic hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations and development in the basin was prepared in cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $19,012. Total costs to 30 September 1993 are $272,289. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $441,809. Total costs to 30 September 1993 are $7,528,187. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop a base of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1993 funds were used for hydrograph development and routings at selected watersheds within the Connecticut Basin. Total costs for the fiscal year were $5,989. Total costs to 30 September 1993 are $23,869. The New England Division has initiated a program to consolidate the vast amount of sediment chemistry data it maintains using the Geographic Information System (GIS). This data management system will allow Project Managers, as well as other agencies, to quickly retrieve historical data for specific waterways and help determine the quality of material in that area. Fiscal year 1993 funds were used to continue a joint effort with U.S. Geological Survey to collect existing sediment chemistry data for Boston Harbor and enter this information into GIS. Total costs for the fiscal year were $47,706. Total costs to 30 September 1993 are $59,691. 55. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Total costs for Planning, Engineering and Design were $442,029 for local protection studies for Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts. 56. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $511,307 for the navigation project at Boston, Massachusetts; $181,481for the local protection project at Roughans Point, Revere, Massachusetts; and $1,097,251 for the local protection project at Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts. 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-A See Section In Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 Total Cost to FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 1. Andrews River, MA (Contributed Funds) 2. Aquatic Plant Control 3. Boston Harbor, MA 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 5. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 6. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 4 Cost 4 New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 219,042 219,042 139,991 103,481 10,000 6,527 -25,263 11,237 1,000 10,794 10,000 571,000 - 441,041 131,383 131,383 14,029 14,029 4,812,428 4,785,446 1,743,139 4,725,917 14,500oo 14,500 1,000 1,014 599,000 635,889 43,836 43,253 105,338 724,786 104,507 723,945 - 187,500 - 187,500 1,ooo000 294,496 361 293,742 489,000 25,015,974 41 511,306 24,935,210 41 31,000 10,232,709 42 31,003 10,232,039 42 S 21,798,322 1.2 S 21,798,322 1.2 5,078,637 7,229,031 124,154,114 5,113,557 7,287,200 123,941,972 115,432 115,432 - 390,677 - 390,677 S 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 266,705 12 - 266,705 12 833,430 168,240 832,130 164,705 17,441 22,421 159,351 3,889,852 9 158,950 3,888,924 9 S 43,500 - 43,500 - 1,541,185 7,8 - 1,541,185 78 59,443 839,332 59,043 414,000 361,156 601,116 289,131 16,834,500 4 474,304 16,833,301 60,000 60,000 130,410 130,410 1-28 TABLE 1-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 Total Cost to FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 7. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 8. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) Guilford Harbor, CT (Contributed Funds) 10. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 11. Josias River, ME (Contributed Funds) 12. New Haven Harbor, CT 13. Newburyport Harbor, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 27,168 27,168 7,298 7,298 16,080 16,080 220,167,, 323,226 218,910 323,422 25,216 25,216 15,049 15,049 136,680 136,679 174,938 127,210 78,995 37,855 4,080 1,218,727 43 3,890 1,218,536 43 11,643 11,643 237,512 237,512 388,400 3,263,437 436,764 3,262,822 158,341 158,341 137,222 137,222 278,782 1,664,211 316,606 1,660,895 - 25,500 - 25,500 - 576,856 - 576,856 27,000 -44,007 48,725 -42,288 - 30,830 - 2,755 49,547 49,547 3,000 27,007 3,400 3,400 197,746 1,933,537 197,491 1,933,053 191,000 26,420 169,512 6,315 101,000 5,079 57,442 148,342 42,943 166,296 - - 401,313 543,000 374,789 567,405 55,631 55,931 21,671 23,081 340,395 171,747 295,085 131,888 127,813 26,813 4,773,246 3 4,773,246 3 713,949 15,067,362 251,242 14,604,631 - 565,224 - 565,224 420,134 5,935,755 421,209 5,935,755 1,415,524 1,415,524 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 14. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (Contributed Funds) 15. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (Contributed Funds--Required) 16. Saco River, ME (Contributed Funds Required) 17. Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME (Contributed Funds) 22. Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT (Contributed Funds) 23. Revere Beach, MA (Contributed Funds) 24. Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. 5 Cost 8 Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. 3 Cost 2 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. 3 Cost New Work Contrib. 2 Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,714,51033 2,714,51033 44,000 34,877 36,820 47,156 8,000 8,000 11,527 6,175,231 11,330 6,174,704 - 1,926,000 - 1,926,000 - 17,587 - 17,587 ,676,000 ,183,675 32,863 32,863 ,500,000 ,553,326 368,000 2,327,927 812,769 2,482,034 1,634 1,634 744,819 141,345 116,842 456,966 -65,676 18,390,552 o10 -57,336 18,390,552 10 49,609 2,222,857 74,312 2,222,857 -160,048 4,439,659 184,841 4,439,659 - 1,064,983 - 1,064,983 31,829 31,489 65,044 65,490 975,562 456,051 115,905 2,963,840 325,315 2,653,632 - 74,996 - 74,996 - 27,286 - 550 530 -10,904 425 -10,064 262,700 37,049 5,400 5,400 28,400 72,455 48,549 207,959 286 286 3,600 19,406 433,098 388,670 567,195 567,195 44,000 31,405 1,410,000 1,587,028 879,506 1,032,628 - 1,170,000 1,410,819 - 449,251 690,070 ,450,000 134,384 ,293,000 10,256 2,771,316 1,260,000 -5,000 858 -400,000 135,919 -144,000 747,188 634 - 3,858,712 13 11,748 3,832,261 13 144,000 2,435,965 23,944 2,174,097 4,035 239,200 232,370 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 25. Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI (Contributed Funds) 26. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 30A. West Hill Dam, MA 31. Bluffs Community, Center, Swansea, MA (Contributed Funds) 32. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 33A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 33B. Barre Falls Dam, MA 33C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 33D. Colebrook River Lake, CT New Work . Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 190,000 - 153,914 780,000 48,784 500,000 1,470,000 1,049,602 1,252,300 - 970,000 - 842,350 56,053 46,386 446,664 495,700 381,399 514,607 - 40,000 - 18,416 250,000 20,277 708,000 522,000 533,639 3,944 464,000 296,069 -150,000 132,133 970,000 842,350 823,891 416,570 669,679 4 5 243,812 4 - 2,306,902 14 - 2,306,902 14 522,000 6,151,698 564,064 6,148,670 126,000 21,348 - 55,250 43,066 145,743 103,900 125,039 114,090 432,684 419,200 404,120 420,098 463,933 401,400 433,065 388,071 601,502 538,900 506,086 484,120 287,383 192,300 243,582 208,495 205,000 209,982 458,000 468,128 438,000 431,956 566,000 658,696 321,000 330,462 166,000 43,708 55,250 - 8,606,000 - 8,606,000 250,000 1,661,343 138,040 1,537,416 - 11,039,298 15 - 11,039,298 15 535,000 8,389,723 556,289 8,386,450 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 408,000 6,602,060 452,098 6,579,663 - 4,815,679 16 - 4,815,679 16 427,000 7,222,429 485,348 7,211,327 - 32,000 17 - 32,000 , - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 290,000 3,839,027 287,073 3,815,621 1-31 FY92 Total Cost to FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 33E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 33F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 33G. Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes, West River, VT 33H. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (Contributed Funds) 331. Knightville Dam, MA 33J. Littleville Lake, MA 33K. North Hartland Lake, VT 33L. North Springfield Lake, VT 33M. Otter Brook Lake, NH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,950,530 2,950,530 70,517 109,900 45,810 123,252 15,000 56,274 5,000 5,884 76,000 84,492 10,000 9,446 - - 113,000 - 5,000 - - 3,796 - 100,000 300,000 640,000 79,142 178,460 602.542 30,000 23,646 10,000 42,648 2,079 172,000 1,826,197 154,551 1,803,250 162,000 95,785 -17,000 20,831 17,000 10,700 237,000 167,389 96,000 20,831 22,000 14,496 288,676 1,328,676 302,771 1,162,915 211,000 25,162 86,700 331,000 138,101 86,700 0 3,415,640 ' 3,415,640 19 371,742 621,500 343,235 620,486 580,000 501,874 494,000 8,277,446 620,874 8,263,662 7,013,412 7,013,412 312,836 260,000 231,465 349,207 271.000 242,654 266,000 5,498,927 319,216 5,498,566 7,312,22519 7,312,22519 442,728 346,300 473,378 312,921 470,000 528,790 381,000 6,409,543 370,651 6,376,108 6,831,52620 6,831,526" 466,983 445,500 461,934 410,366 589,000 662,997 402,000 10,591,449 409,645 10,570,819 4,360,44821 4,360,44821 394,583 421,900 358,570 422,768 435,000 455,920 484,000 6,637,297 443,300 6,578,892 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 Total Cost to FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 330. Surry Mountain Lake, NH Townshend Lake, Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 33R. Union Village Dam, VT 34A. Black Rock Lake, CT Hancock Brook Lake, CT Hop Brook Lake, CT 34D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 33N. 3,202 1,047 25,000 13,279 30,000 1,333,000 37,828 1,319,077 25,000 25,000 2,833,610" 2,833,6102 363,648 503,200 288,745 475,904 383,000 475,776 371,000 7,035,491 356,547' 7,009,833 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 419,047 385,736 327,400 346,364 415,000 400,839 583,000 7,964,418 584,868 7,906,489 1,666,752 24 1,666,752 24 440,639 421,200 383,216 483,014 460,000 456,312 447,000 6,485,725 464,933 6,477,945 40,000 17 40,000 " 485,337 454,700 292,022 520,111 506,000 545,910 - 4,095,160 2 - 4,095,160 2 312,000 6,275,393 417,716 6,263,162 8,182,300 8,182,300 234,572 271,300 196,744 239,230 280,000 346,003 239,000 3,852,581 231,062 3,837,789 4,178,911 4,178,911 145,385 129,900 92,555 174,115 132,000 136,332 834,840 1,768,800 1,067,000 722,931 942,275 1,874,473 114,000 1,865,934 106,116 1,850,873 - 6,151,562 26 - 6,151,562 26 922,000 10,893,325 1,072,911 10,862,876 2,850,512 2 2,850,512 27 282,597 410,300 161,938 472,018 448,000 466,801 326,000 3,633,708 297,155 3,559,332 1-33 7,398,413 23 7,398,413 23 33P, 3 3Q. 34B. 34C. __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 34E. Thomaston Dam, CT 35. Machias River, Machiasport, ME 36A. Blackwater Dam, NH 36B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 36C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 36D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 36E. North Nasua River, Leominster, MA 37. Narraguagus River, Millbridge, ME 38. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 39. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost . 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 362,175 445,400 309,606 459,772 513,000 519,966 30,095 6,035 396,000 7,365,342 410,791 7,344,702 70,000 37,964 100,095 43,999 1,319,746 28 1,319,746 s 238,909 220,200 210,802 235,228 365,000 372,960 270,000 4,739,094 244,158 4,706,543 2,014,253 2 2,014,253 2 329,177 320,900 267,761 354,784 277,000 292,138 373,000 5,693,569 386,074 6,690,993 7,950,487 0 7,950,487 439,123 611,000 396,856 641,213 945,000 834,456 489,000 9,174,382 532,581 9,088,579 - . . . 21,452,440 31 . . - - 21,452,440 31 817,308 1,228,100 1,111,000 1,084,000 12,635,570 685,643 1,091,214 1,243,716 1,132,816 12,539,061 40,189 - 14,547 17,937 117,810 15,377 - 52,500 30,073 3,973 50,000 40,216 157,999 47,861 52,500 80,073 44,189 11,510,088 11,510,088 636,257 422,200 562,783 380,424 2,394 1 125 240,400 299,281 211,000 5,503,821 283,917 5,492,122 . 6,513,763 32 . 6,513,763 32 - -3,456 . -1,954 1,954 1,954 70,990 70,990 20,554 " 20,554 " 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 Total Cost to FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 40. Roughans Point, Revere, MA 41. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA 42. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds - Other) 43A. Buffumville Lake, MA 43B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 43C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 43D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 43E. West Thompson Lake, CT 43F. Westville Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -15,000 290,741 100,000 113,329 425,000 2,255,000 153,622 2,031,258 230,000 104,779 69,000 1,044,779 181,481 1,030,790 1,389,000 1,488,000 5,557,000 1,417,907 1,539,297 5,142,066 9,911,300 9,900,640 238,719 439,700 186,438 340,563 446,000 497,172 195,000 4,211,191 278,240 4,190,342 3,367,970 3 3,367,453 * 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 3 2,998,603 " 321,394 341,300 298,391 347,133 . - 472,156 374,900 346,595 400,740 1,642,659 1,656,803 390,100 362,869 553,000 521,885 343,000 435,671 361,000 387,547 439,500 5,392,516 462,474 5,365,270 - 7,057,043 3 - 7,057,043 3 348,000 4,864,439 345,135 4,853,296 - 4,461,268 3 - 4,461,268 37 979,000 7,788,947 927,418 7,723,013 6,447,164 " 6,447,164 38 309,102 375,500 273,978 388,355 407,399 419,800 385,655 436,725 352,663 327,000 331,714 313,840 523,000 399,276 563,000 546,909 328,000 359,577 434,000 5,645,599 552,499 5,612,110 - 7,001,220 39 - 7,001,220 39 558,000 6,372,997 603,299 6,384,263 5,684,683 40 5,684,683 40 332,500 5,401,559 319,290 5,381,908 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 Total Cost to FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 44. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 45. Town River Bay, Quincy, MA (Contributed Funds) 46. West River, New Haven, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds-Not Required) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 400,000 175,000 359,252 268,427 746,000 2,833,000 5,574,740 198,271 2,543,540 4,717,560 144,000 33,538 30,972 2,102 -- 23,750 ..- 26,500 19,502 17,200 190,000 1,300,000 1,900,000 84,849 1,284,991 1,821,672 822,000 94,400 9,764 154,629 100 317,036 47,371 161,000 150,916 200,000 172,886 -4,810 2,652 305,000 150,916 200,000 172,886 55,228 55,228 - 23,750 - 17,200 185,000 4,170,000 303,490 4,084,536 - 822,000 * 54,112 525,777 " - 94,400 4,164 61,399 IExcludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. * Includes $331,626 for previous projects, $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. 4 Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 6 Includes $245,000 Public Works Funds. 6 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. ' Includes $287,374 for previous projects and excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT." 8 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 9 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. o1In0c ludes $130,390 for previous projects. 1 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 12 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 13 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. " Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 15 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds. 16 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 7 Recreational cost sharing. 18 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 2 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 2 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 24 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 25 Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 26 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 28 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 29 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 32 Cash for construction only. Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. " Includes $12,000 for previous project. 4 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 31 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. * Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. 38 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 9 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 40 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 41 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 42 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 4 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. 4 Excludes $3,109 for land costs. 4, Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 4" Excludes $554,638 for land costs. 1-36 TABLE 1-B Acts NEW ENGLAND DIVISION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sept. 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13,1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30,1935 Do. Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Sept. 7, 1940 July 24,1946 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 ANDtREWS RIVER,MA (See Section 1 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to public marina; two jetties; three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text.) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 3 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.4 Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one mile from 40-foot main channel to L Street. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1966. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890,p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd sess.,Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Mar. 11,1913. H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 Public Law 420,78th Cong. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cog., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.2 Section 101, Public Law 101-640. 1-37 Documents __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sept. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program. Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 26, 1937 CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 4 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds ftornom War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. CHIATHAM (STAGE) ILARBOR, MA (See Section 5 of Text.) Entrance channel ten feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW IIARTFOIWRD, CT (See Section 6 of Text.) Jetties at mouth The Hartford dike Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook Bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments. Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. CUTTYIIUNK HARBOR, MA (See Section 7 of Text.) Channel 10 feet deep, 75 feet wide. Anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, 800 feet wide. Maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, December 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 49, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, April 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1961. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 15, 1960. H. Doc. 81, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized July 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 2, 1945 July 11, 1870 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 5,1886 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 2,1882 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16,1949 Aug. 9, 1955 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Sept. 16,1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 8 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. GUILFORD IHARBOR, MA (See Section 9 of Text.) Entrance channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep; a channel 60 feet wide, 6 feet deep; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 10 of Text.) The main breakwater. Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. Breakwater enclosing inner harbor. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. JOSIAS RIVER, ME (See Section 11 of Text.) Channel 5 feet deep, 40 feet wide from Perkins Cove to and including a 3.2 acre anchorage basin in Flat Pond. Extension of Flat Pond 5 foot anchorage area by 1 acre. Deepen existing 900 foot long Federal Channel and 2.1 acres of anchorage area to 7 feet. NEW HAVEN IIARBOR,CT (See Section 12 of Text.) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25 foot channel. 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage. Brewery Street channel declared non-navigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA (See section 13 of Text.) Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. POINT JUDITH POND AND IIARBOROF REFUGE, POINT JUDIT ,RI (See section 14 of Text.) The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing three shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 15, 1965. H. Doc. 149, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual report 1868, p. 785 and S. Misc.Do,. 81, 40th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 26, 47th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610. H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 377, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, January 14, 1993. Plans approved by a board of Engineers, October 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535,62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H.R. 3511, 81st Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 234. Annual Report 1910, p. 59. H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 29, 1976. 1-39 Documents __ ___ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960, as amended Nov. 6, 1986 Mar. 2, 1827 June 23, 1866 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25,1910 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960, as amended May 17,1950 July 14, 1960 as amended Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23,1962 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME and NH (See Section 15 of Text.) Removal of ledge rock; widening 35-foot channel; extending channel and maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project. Modified existing project for widening and extending 35-foot channel. Construct six-foot channels and anchorages. Widen 35-foot channel to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widen northern limit of 35-foot channel by 100 feet and widen southern limit to 550 feet at Goat Island. SACO RIVER, ME (See Section 16 of Text.) Extension of piers, placing bouys, and removal of obstruction at entrance to harbor. Breakwater on north side of mouth of river. Jetty on north side or mouth of river. Channel improvements and jetty extension on south side of mouth of river. Present project channel dimensions and extensions of north breakwater about 1,600 feet. Extension of north breakwater to Sharps Ledge. Anchorage and maneuvering basin. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR and POOL at BIDDEFORD, ME (See Section 17 of Text.) Dredged basin 6 feet deep and construction of three ice breakers. Channel 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT (See section 22 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand approximately 6,000 feet of shore from about 350 feet south of South Street northerly to Ivy Street, and construction of 8 impermeable groins each 330 feet long. Widening by direct placement of sand along 4,300 feet of shore front between Ivy Street and the groin structure south of Tyler Avenue and periodic beach nourishment as required over the 50-year economic life of the project. REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 23 of Text.) Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. Annual Report 1892. H. Doc. 556, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 482, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 107. P.L. 86-645, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965. Section 202,P.L. 99-662. S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1884, p. 482 H. Doc. 752, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 477, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 14, 1967. H. Doc. 49, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1990. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 101-640. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, September 12, 1992 H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. December 15, 1970 and S. Res. December 17, 1970 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. 1-40 Documents TABLE 1-B (Continued) Acts NEW ENGLAND DIVISION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized July 7,1964 Nov. 28, 1990 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 24, 1946, as amended Mar. 7. 1974 July 24, 1946 as amended Nov. 6, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended Aug. 18, 1941 June 30, 1948, as amended ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK LUBEC, ME (See Section 24 of Text.) Stone slope protection for the lighthouse at Mulholland Point. SOUTHEAST LIGIITIIOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 25 of Text.) Relocate the lighthouse approximately 200 feet north of its present location. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 26 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore west of Merwin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels. BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER, SWANSEA, MA (See section 31 of Text.) Construct 300 linear feet or rock revetment along the seaward side of the Bluffs Community Center. CIHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA (See Section 32 of Text.) Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT (See Section 33F of Text.) Bank protection of 500 linear feet with 6-inch concrete paving block and riprap toe protection. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES FOR TOWNSIIEND AND BALL MOUNTAIN LAKES, VT (See Section 33G of Text.) Construct fish passage facilities along the West River in Vermont. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT (See Section 33H of Text.) Bank protection by clearing and grubbing existing slope and refilling eroded areas with compacted granular fill. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 33N of Text.) Approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log storage structures. Construct improvements to existing pumping station and gravity outflow channel. Roosevelt Campobello International Park Act, P.L. 88-363. Section 416, P.L. 101-640. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 101-640. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, March 30, 1992. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, February 26,1993. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, December 17, 1991 Section 872, P.L. 99-662. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 27, 1988. H. Doc. 724, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 13, 1986. 1-41 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24,1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 3, 1958 July 24,1946, as amended July 24,1946, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 31,1992 July 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended MACIIIAS RIVER, MACIIIASPORT, ME (See section 35 of Text.) Construct 380 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to State Highway Route 92. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, MILLBRIDGE, ME (See section 37 of Text.) Construct 100 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to U.S. Route 1A. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRIIAVEN AND ACUSIINET, MA (See Section 38 of Text.) Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. NORTH NASHIIUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA (See Section 36E of Text.) Construct 400 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to the Leominster Connector., PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME (See Section 439 of Text.) Construct stone revetment along 100 linear feet adjacent to State Highway Route 161 and excavate four river shoals. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 40 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA (See section 41 of Text.) STAMFORD, CT (See Section 42 of Text.) Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal damage. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 44 of Text.) Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. TOWN RIVER BAY, QUINCY, MA (See Section 45 of Text.) Stone revetment approximately 280 feet long and 15 feet high. WEST RIVER, WEST IAVEN, CT (See Section 46 of Text.) Widen river for 1,150 feet to 50-70 feet. Widen the Wintergreen Brook channel to 20-30 feet. Construct recreational walkway connecting two existing city parks. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, April 8, 1993. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief Engineers, March 9, 1993. S. Doc, 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 8, 1993. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 22, 1988. Section 401, P.L. 99-662. Section 101, P.L. 102-580. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 1, 1990. H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 16, 1990. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, September 26, 1988. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 'Contains latest maps. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 'Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 4A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Apponaug Cove, RIP Bagaduce River, ME ,'-4' Bar Harbor, ME' Bass Harbor, ME'" Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH13'4 Beverly Harbor, MA' Black Rock Harbor, CT' Boothbay Harbor, ME' Branford Harbor, CT' Bridgeport Harbor, CT' Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI' Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME"6 Bucksport Harbor, ME' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME' 6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA'6* Camden Harbor, ME' Canapitsit Channel, MA'.4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' Cathance River, ME' 3 Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI "4 Cobscook Bay, ME"3'4 Cocheco River, NH"' Cohasset Harbor, MA' Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME"' Criehaven Harbor, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Damariscotta River, ME"'4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME"'4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA' Duck Island Harbor, CTI Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NH"14 Fall River Harbor, MA' Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT 1, Frenchboro Harbor, ME' Georges River, ME' Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI"* Greenwich Bay, RI' Greenwich Harbor, CTI Hampton Harbor, NH"6 Harraseeket River, ME"4* Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' Hendrick's Harbor, ME' For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1990 1983 1987 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1984 1939 1954 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1989 1893 1969 1988 1896 1931 1957 Cost to September 30, 1993 C Construction 156,874 2 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 32 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 4,491,119 49 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 147,438 21,000 191,406 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,737 38 795,253 40,776 24,200 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 29 6,500 65,614 35 21,759 62,454 9 6,164,757 40 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 36 189,037 2,000 198,758 200,000 30,963 $ 8,401 28,204 1,596,922 578,321 6,527 204,872 2,195,527 5,309 $ 38,462 6,325 25,000 100,000 193,761 1-44 _ _i Contributed )peration and Funds Expended Maintenance (Construction) 42,189 39 2,187 21,995 20,382 132,289 261,522 28,465 100,000 1,641,728 33,543 1,925,607 2,113,971 0 147,887 27,537 20,833 291,009 123,757 32,906 220,849 46 69,323 162,293 12,279 361,364 20,000 24,465 1,048,574 13,161 53,551 345,535 111,289 96,629 10,117 54,328 905 5,458 362,224 399,546 911,239 35,000 3 17,238 62,980 10,000 114,088 4 3,032 2,064,767 - 62 332,550 35,000 188,802 24,616 266,455 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1993 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Hingham Harbor, MA' Housatonic River, CT Hyannis Harbor, MA Ipswich River, MA' Island End River, Chelsea, MA'6 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME' Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' Jonesport Harbor, ME Kennebec River, ME ' Kennebunk River, ME' Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA'* Lamprey River, NH'14 Little Harbor, NH' 4, 6 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA'4 Lubec Channel, ME' Lynn Harbor, MA Machias River, ME' Malden River, MA' ,2 Matinicus Harbor, ME' Medomak River, ME' Menemsha Creek, MA' Merrimack River, MA' Mianus River, CT' Milford Harbor, CT 1,22 Moosabec Bar, ME' Mystic River, CT' Mystic River, MA' Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA' Narraguagus River, ME' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA' New Harbor, ME' , 2 New Haven Breakwater, CT 1 New London Harbor, CT' Newport Harbor, RI' Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT 1,6 Northeast Harbor, ME Norwalk Harbor, CT Owl's Head Harbor, ME 13,2 Patchogue River, CT 1 , 2 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT' Pawtuxet Cove, RI' Penobscot River, ME' Pepperell Cove, ME' Pig Island Gut, ME'6 Pleasant River, ME' Plymouth Harbor, MA' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA' Portland Harbor, ME' Potowomut River, RI' Providence River and Harbor, RI' Provincetown Harbor, MA' Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA66* 1954 1983 1992 1969 1983 1980 1977 1992 1992 1985 1895 1976 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1989 1930 1957 1986 1989 1969 1953 1966 1950 1986 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1984 1978 1975 1985 1969 1966 1892 1990 1956 1985 1882 1990 1985 1972 28,316 859,691 484,137 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 7,489,073 1,599,940 19 350,334 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,000 21 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,506 31 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 68 821,144 1,857,618 118,620 24 1,242,246 638,774 17 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,129 39 124,158 351,181 318,787 28 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,218 52,.3 1,083,504 9,588,710 27 5,000 $ 25,417,022 *o 3,548,954 0' 38,764 1-45 166,800 2,541,964 919,947 " 32,947 180,786 651,644 3,726 3,960,620 1,243,802 33,893 33,563 279,079 15,630 23,941 247,314 229,165 45,097 8,989 92,359 722,254 323,408 659,390 1,355,190 6 25,227 143,385 2,008,406 746,493 107,505 708,967 28,611 40,273 1,856,828 146,478 117,468 51,047 3,827,329 42 13,867 730,745 662,713 194,772 951,886 46,882 86,456 217 1,409,441 4 846,590 7,940,340 50 4,425,655 6 1,053,966 222,010 103,363 192,336 48 832,119 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 7 14,000 20,385 7,015 65,139 34,500 4,383 156,694 20,000 295,356 541,611 760,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report for Cost to September 30, 1993 Construction Operation a Maintenan Richmond Harbor, ME1 .' Richmond's Island Harbor, ME ' 4 Rockland Harbor, ME' Rockport Harbor, ME '3 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA' Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA I-" Royal River, ME"' Rye Harbor,NHI St. Croix River, ME' Sakonnet Harbor, RI Sakonnet River, RI . 0 Salem Harbor, MA'-5 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA'8 Sasanoa River, ME '.3 ' Scarboro River, ME' Scituate Harbor, MA' Searsport Harbor, ME' Seekonk River,RI' Sesuit Harbor, MA , South Bristol Harbor, ME' Southport Harbor, CT' Southwest Harbor, ME' Stamford Harbor, CT' Stockton Harbor, ME '3 ' Stonington Harbor, CT' Stonington Harbor, ME16 Stony Creek, Branford, CTI'"' Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' Taunton River, MA' Tenants Harbor, ME' Thames River, CT' Union River, ME3 15 Vineyard Haven, MA' Wareham Harbor, MA' Warren River, RI' Warwick Cove, RIP' Wellfleet Harbor, MA' Wells Harbor, ME' Westcott Cove, CT' Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT' Weymouth Back River, MA' Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., MA".= Wickford Harbor, RI"2 Wilson Point Harbor, CT' 4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' Winter Harbor, MEIA Winthrop Harbor, MA' Woods Hole Channel, MA' York Harbor, ME' 1883 1882 1976 1989 1986 1989 1986 1991 1950 1983 1909 1969 1922 1915 1976 1971 1966 1954 1992 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1978 1914 1948 1920 1967 1912 1943 1896 1890 1975 1981 1991 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1940 1977 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 32,000 59 22,000 1,786,754 336,704 130,342 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 16 672,214 226,306 89,593 59,213 7 180,042 892,824 ~1 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 2s 360,973 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 43 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 230,000 239,654 1-46 Contributed nd Funds Expended ce (Construction) 1,808 478,111 260,516 263,208 12,531 770,108 12 707,592 36,392 213,472 13,578 607,649 16,060 124 1,286,589 190,389 54,640 855,409 491,368 43,923 388,649 66,540 1,751,504 45 23,216 123,060 16,518 348,108 32,917 20,773 1,626,317 168,425 17,886 42,851 91,340 967,066 1,907,899 347,248 182,224 27,353 1,586,428 "4 138,348 29,870 22,360 38,515 55,614 374,306 51,430 49,562 11 61,338 47 19,892 21,928 10,000 69,976 67,792 124,588 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 85,176 133,985 33 32,000 212,0000 5 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 23 32,161 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 'Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. No commerce reported. 6 Completed except for inactive portion. 0 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). SExcludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. SInactive. * Includes $53,254 for previous projects. 1o Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. " Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation and breakwaters repaired in 1961. 12 Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other for maintenance. " Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in I. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. "4Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. SImprovement adequate for commerce. 1 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Includes $40,800 for previous project. " Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. *'In cludes $509,411 for previous projects. o Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 1 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 23 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. 2 Includes $11,350 for previous project. 26 H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminating maintenance dredging. 2 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 2 Includes $133,357 for previous project. 29 Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. "0 Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 31 Includes $42,340 for previous project. 32 Includes $22,000 for previous project. 33Excludes $10,000 Contributed funds, Other. 34 Includes $81,410 for previous project. - Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. , Includes $21,000 for previous projects. 37 Includes $135,143 for previous project. S Includes $10,000 for previous project, 39 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 40 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. 42 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 43 Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000(Town R.). 44 Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River). 4 Includes $59,420 for previous project. 40 Includes $35,214 for previous project. 4 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. 48 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other expended. 49 Includes $378,450 for previous project. 5o Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 5 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 52 Includes $188,647 for previous project. 3 Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach Dike. 64 Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed Funds. 6 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds, Other. * Includes $3,160 for previous project. 6 Excludes $173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. " Includes $45,835 for new work for previous project; excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. '9 Excludes $15,000 expended for previous project. * Includes $3,761,412 for previous projects. 6 Includes $650,136 for previous projects. "'Excludes $ 37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 1993 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT ' 1958 $ 5,810 $11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT ' 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA ' 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI 4 1984 405,491 955,23728080 Compo Beach, Westport, CT ' 1962 84,544 169,089237 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1 1961 47,131 94,262089 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT ' 1963 26,886 9453,26771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach),53,771 Guilford, CT 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT ' 1956 14,401 28,802641 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1 1961 3,930 7,8059 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 5 1986 50,0007859 Middle Beach, CT ' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA ' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI ' 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA 1 1977 118,882 104,875 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI ' 1959 40,143 82,8000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT ' 1961 23,759 47,518000 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven CT 1991 292,545 157,51833 Seaside Park, CT ' 1958 150,000 329,92157533 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CTI 1983 1,186,830 329,21 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 889,330 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT' 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT ' 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA' 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA ' 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA ' 1960 176,567 353,134 ' Completed. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) 4 Completed except for inactive portion. BInactive. 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1993 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA3,4 Alley Bay, Beals, ME34'o Amesbury, Powwow River, MA ,4 Ansonia - Derby, CT' Bagaduce River, ME 3,4,10 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 3,4 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3.4.10 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA .4 Canton, MA .4 Charles River Dam, MA 3 Charlestown, NH 3.4 Cherryfield, ME3 . 4 Chicopee, MA 3 Chicopee Falls, MA3 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3,4 Cocheco River, NH 3,4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3.4 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3,4 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA3,4.01 Danbury, CT 3 Derby, CT 3 East Branch Dam, CT 3 East Hartford, CT 3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 3,4 Fort Kent, ME 3A Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA 3, Gulf Street, Milford, CT Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT 3 Hartford, CT 3 Hartford, White River, VT 3.4 Haverhill, MA 3 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3,4 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3.,4.10 Holyoke, MA 3 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 3.4 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3,4.10 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3.4.10 Huntington, MA 3.4.10 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA '*. Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 31.4.10 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3,4,10 Keene, NH 3.4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH .4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3.4.10 Little River, Belfast,ME 3. 4 Lowell, MA Lower Woonsocket, RI 3 Machias River, Machias, ME3. 4 Mad River Lake, CT 3 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME*3*4 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3,4,1o Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3,4,1o Nashua, NH * New London, CT Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3,4,10 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1989 1986 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1991 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1982 1976 1990 1945 1977 1987 1973 1987 1980 1988 1950 1992 1985 $ 41,419 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 47,300 156,568 41,170,921 113,330 191,095 1,433,600 2,183,912 S168,000 183,100 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 13 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 365,000 2,572,357 6,094,100 9 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 25 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,146 551,606 37,852 166,682 490,600 1 6,600,681 152,000 4,773,020 243,000 107,682 110,000 270,000 8 8,504,919 28 222,500 $ 21 4,576 92,981 5,554,088 1 385 411,292 22 180,000 2 19 7,637 3,616,290 14 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 43,000 1,266,638 20 327 2,015,709 2 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Northampton, MA 3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT 3', North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA' North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3 .40-,o Norwalk, CT 3." Norwich, CT 3 Park River, Hartford, CT 3 Pawcatuck, CT 3 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI*3." Penobscot River, Old Town, ME ".4 Phillips Lake, MA Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 3, Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3.4,10 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3,4.o St. John River Basin, ME 24 Salmon River, Colchester, CT 3 4 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME Saxonville, MA3 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 3.4 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3,4.,10 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA .4 South River, Conway, IMA Springdale, MA3 Springfield, MA 3 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3.4 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 3A Sucker Brook Dam, CT3 Three Rivers, MA3 Torrington, East Branch, CT 3 , Torrington, West Branch, CT 3 . Trumbull Lake, CT' Village of Saxtons, VT 3,4,10 Ware, MA 3 .4 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 3.4 Weston, VT*3.4 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA34 West Springfield, MA' 2" West Warren, MA3 "4 Whitmanville Lake, MA Winsted, CT 3 Woonsocket, RI 3 Worcester Diversion, MA3 For Last Full Report See Annual Report for Cost to September 30, 1993 C 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1982 1987 1986 1980 1983 1984 1980 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1983 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 1992 1964 1979 1954 1962 1978 ' Inactive. 2Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. a Completed. ' Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5 Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims in the amount of $13,295. 6 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. "Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. 9 Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. o1E0m ergency Bank Protection. " Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 12 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. SIncludes $380,000 Public Works Administration Funds. " Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. '6 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. SExcludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. " Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1'Ex9c ludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 2 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 2 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 1-50 Contributed onstruction Funds 680,000 17 73,865 3,235,000 23 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 58,876,919 - 644,311 21406 3,174,26014,106 178,045 300,000 189,000 227,500 73,674 193,290 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 6 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 577,000 18 5,350 116,2963 19,500 2,227,792 58,800 1,577,189 12 389,237 228,237 1,498,800 140,500 400,000 265,300 13,079 119,433 1,798,728 27 14,343 389,176 41,000 605,023 245,500 4,033,100 224,476 5,086,896 70,161 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. "Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. * Irrigation demonstration project. SIncludes $610,000 Public Works Administration funds. "Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers. TABLE 1-F 27Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration Funds and $1,579,000 for previous project. 2Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. 29Excludes $1,629,256 for lands and $303,251 Contributed Funds, Other. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1993 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME 1 1935 $ 6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-51 TABLE 1-E (Continued) __ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report for Funds Expended Date Deauthorized Contributed Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, CT Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) Baker Brook, MA Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) Beards Brook Reservoir, NH Beaver Brook Lake, NH Bennington Reservoir, NH Big River Reservoir, RI Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Brockway Lake, VT Cambridgeport Lake, VT Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) Claremont Lake, NH Clyde, RI Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT Connecticut River below Hartford CT (uncompleted portion) Cotuit Harbor, MA Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) Eastport Harbor, ME Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Gaysville Lake, VT Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) Greenwich Point Beach, CT Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) Honey Hill Lake, NH Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) Ludlow Lake, VT Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Manchester Harbor, MA Marblehead Harbor, MA Mattapoisett Harbor, MA Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Monoosnoc Brook, MA Monoosnoc Lake, MA Mountain Brook Dam, NH Mystic, CT Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) Nantasket Beach, MA Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (inactive portion) Napatree Beach, RI 1972 1932 1949 1973 1949 1987 1986 1984 1961 1980 1946 1954 1968 1948 1932 1979 1962 1984 1968 1984 1978 1984 1969 1970 1983 1959 1983 1979 1949 1969 1986 1956 1949 1968 1950 1981 1967 1967 1949 1968 1986 1971 1965 1989 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Apr 1951 Jan 1990 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1983 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Oct 1976 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Aug 1972 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1979 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 242,700 8,800 132,146 8,541 26,285,298 638,675 141,530 206,600 92,000 23,986 43,711 57,000 67,700 1-52 TABLE 1-G I) ~II_ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Narragansett Pier, RI New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Nookagee Lake, MA North Andover and Lawrence, MA North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH Norwalk-Wilton, CT Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portion) Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) Pawtucket, RI Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) Pleasant Bay, MA Point Judith, RI Pontiac Diversion, RI Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion) South Coventry Lake, CT South Tunbridge Lake, VT Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Stonington Harbor, ME Stratford, CT Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) The Island Lake, VT Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) Wareham-Marion, MA Victory Lake, VT West Brookfield Reservoir, MA West Canaan Lake, NH Westerly, RI Westfield, MA Westport, CT Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) Westport River, MA Williamsville Reservoir, VT Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 1953 1986 1986 1976 1949 1963 1973 1978 1979 1949 1969 1971 1968 1948 1976 1961 1979 1976 1979 1982 1969 1922 1964 1951 1979 1979 1959 1961 1973 1946 1948 1967 1961 1964 1961 1896 1965 1967 1948 1948 1966 1967 1965 1972 1942 1949 1960 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Nov 1981 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Nov 1977 Nov 1981 Nov 1986 Nov 1977 Apr 1951 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Oct 1979 Jun 1982 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct Jan Nov Nov Mar Dec Jan Nov Aug Nov Jan Novy Jan Aug Aug Jul Aug Nov Sep Feb Nov Jan Dec Nov 563,677 20,000 198,477 24,200 176,000 96,000 2,543 934,500 1978 1990 1986 1979 1977 1944 1990 1986 1977 1979 1990 1986 1990 1977 1977 1960 1977 1986 1969 1970 1979 1990 1944 1986 81,715 168,400 67,000 92,000 507,200 29,634 146,500 1-53 -- - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA Hyannis Harbor, Hyannis, MA Marblehead Harbor, Marblehead, MA Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA Vineyard Haven Harbor, Tisbury, MA Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Costs Expended $ 84,271 4,909 5,351 9,709 6,721 10,794 2,595 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Beach Point, Truro, MA Greenwich Cove, Greenwich, CT Humarock Beach, Scituate, MA Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI Noroton Bay, Darien, CT Morris Cove, New Haven,CT North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA Poppenessett Spit, Mashpee, MA Siasconset Beach, Nantucket,MA Silver to Cedar Beach, Milford, CT Victoria Beach, East Haven, CT Winthrop Shore Drive, Winthrop, MA Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Costs Expended $ 3,879 2,014 4,455 56,123 2,989 14,776 2,172 45,279 5,028 719 1,647 10,334 1-54 Study Identification Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA Hyannis Harbor, Hyannis, MA Marblehead Harbor, Marblehead, MA Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA Vineyard Haven Harbor, Tisbury, MA Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA NEW ENGLAND DIVISION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH Mad River, Waterbury, CT Mad River, Wolcott, CT Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA Point Beach, Milford, CT Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT TABLE 1-K $ 4,726 37,492 36,340 89,739 48,345 14,383 BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 30 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-55 TABLE 1-J Contributed Funds Expended $ 30,000 ~ __ -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Mouth of Blackstone Location River Worcester, MA Woonsocket, RI Lower Woonsocket, RI Blackstone River, Millbury, MA Clear River, Burrillville, RI Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 48 15 13 Estimated Cost Type of Structure Diversion tunnel and channel Channel improvement Flood wall, conduits and channel improvement 32 Slope protection 23 Retaining wall - Land acquisition Lands and Construction Damages' Total $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 3,733,100 1,069,000 3 4,802,100 8,356,239 254,575 168,000 435,000 4,125,0( 8,791,239 254,575 168,000 0 4,125,000 'Includes relocation. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 4 $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 1 $249,999 Federal; $4,576 non-Federal. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 33 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Above Mouth of Connecticut Height River (feet) Estimated Federal Cost Re; Ca Type (acl servoir pacity Constr. and re-feet) uction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 North Hartland 2 North Springfield 2 Ball Mountain 2 Townshend 2 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Otter Brook 2 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Tully 2 Barre Falls 2 Knightville 2 Littleville 2 Conant Brook 2 Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Mad River Sucker Brook White River Jct. White River Jct. Springfield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene Gardner Athol Worcester Northampton Northampton Springfield Winsted Winsted Winsted 228.4 170 Earthfill 211.7 185 Earthfill 191.3 120 Earthfill 178.2 265 Rockfill-. earth 168.3 133 Earthfill 174.4 86 171.2 133 153.3 148.7 130.2 102.8 102.0 122.0 38,000 71,400 50,600 54,600 33,200 $3,186,860 6,349,225 4,781,526 10,689,298 $ 908,300 963,000 2,050,000 350,000 $4,095,160 7,312,225 6,831,526 11,039,298 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 Earthrill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 56 Earthfill 62 Earthfill 62 Rockfillearth 160 Earthfill 150 Earthfill 85 Rockfillearth 49,900 22,000 24,000 49,000 32,400 3,740 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 120.0 178 118.5 68 earth Earthfill Earthfill 1,740,679 1,298,752 1,928,819 2,594,440 5,863,412 1,935,530 3,075,000 368,000 39,000 821,200 1,150,000 1,015,000 4,815,679 1,666,752 1,967,819 3,415,640 7,013,412 2,950,530 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 4 6,983,020 1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Non-Federal cost. I Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-56 TABLE 1-L Name Nearest City Lands NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 - $ 2,591,000 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,143,084 271,000 2,414,084 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 510,691 35,000 545,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 - 386,000 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200 4 1,150,000 10,860,200 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 6 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT2 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,914 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,344,077 50,000 1,394,077 Salmon R., Colchester, CT2 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 6 272,000 1,209,350 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,813,071 3 30,000 1,843,071 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 'To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2 For details see individual report. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. SIncludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. I Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-57 ---- ---- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 34 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Nearest City Miles Above Mouth of Naugatuck River (feet) Estimated Federal Cost Reservoir Height Capacity Type (acre-feet) Lands Constr- and uction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow * East Branch 6 Thomaston Northfield Brook Black Rock Hancock Brook Hop Brook Torrington, CT Torrington, CT Torrington, CT Torrington, CT Waterbury, CT Waterbury, CT Waterbury, CT 41.0 73 Rock and earthfill 43.7 92 Earthfill 30.5 142 Rock and earthfill 30.6 118 Earthfill 29.0 154 Earthfill 25.0 57 Earthfill 15.9 97 Earthfill 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 $3,862,357 4,350 1,959,836 42,000 6,382,112 2,432 8,700 4,030 6,970 1,875,512 5,223,700 1,593,911 2,701,562 1,290,000 3 249836 7,900,000 14,282,112 975,000 2,958,600 2,585,000 3,450,000 2,850,512 8,182,300 4,178,911 6,151,562 ' For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Location Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-Derby, CT Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA Danbury, CT Derby, CT North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT Torrington, West Branch, CT Waterbury- Watertown, CT Miles Above Mouth of Housatonic River 111.0 13.0 96.0 56.0 12.0 83.0 133.0 76.0 96.0 43.0 51.0 52.0 32.0 Type of Structure Earth dike and stone slope protection Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station Stone slope protection Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacememt Walls, levees and pumping station Snagging and clearing project Stone arch culvert Gabionade with slope protection Stone slope protection Timber Bulkhead Dike and channel improvement Walls, dikes and channel Wall, dike and channel Estimated Cost Lands and Construction Damages 2 Total $41,419 $ - $ 41,419 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 430,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 73,865 739,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 - 430,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 647,000 8,229,642 - 73,865 85,000 824,003 - 102,800 - 202,608 - 116,296 389,237 228,237 263,300 389,237 228,237 263,300 I For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-58 Name NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 36 of Text) RESERVOIRS Nearest City Miles Above Mouth of Merrimack River (feet) Reservoir Height Capacity Type (acre-feet) Construction Franklin Falls 2 Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater 2 Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett 2.4 Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell 2 Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 30CI000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg, MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. - Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA 2 Haverhill, MA 2 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,863,485 - 1,863,485 pumping station Lowell, MA 2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 North Nashua River, MA 2.3 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA 2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. 3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. " Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 1-59 Name Estimated Federal Cost Lands and Damages 2 Total REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 1-0 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 43 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Mouth of Thames Height River (feet) Estimated Federal Cost Reservoir Lands Capacity Constr. and Type (acre-feet) uction namen'. I . Hodges Village 2 Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 Buffumville 2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 East Brimfield 2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 Westville 2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 West Thompson 2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 Mansfield Hollow 2 Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Type of Structure Estimated Cost Lands and Construction Damages I Total Norwich, CT West River, New Haven, CT 15.0 Channel improvements Channel improvements $1,209,000 4,610,313 $72,000 $1,281,000 554,638 5,164,951 1 Borne by local interests. 2 Excludes $61,399 Contributed funds not required. 1-60 Name Nearest City "i - 11 $1,317,268 2,157,603 1,337,043 2,284,683 5,036,220 4,107,164 $3,144,000 841,000 5,720,000 3,400,000 1,965,000 2,340,000 $4,461,268 2,998,603 7,057,043 5,684,683 7,001,220 6,447,164 Location Miles Above Mouth of Thames River NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Date Survey Project Conducted Date Survey Project Conducted CONNECTICUT Bridgeport Harbor/ Pequonnock River Connecticut River below Hartford Housatonic River Milford Harbor New Haven Harbor Patchogue River Stamford Harbor Stony Creek MAINE Bass Harbor Bucks Harbor Bunker Harbor Cape Porpoise Harbor Corea Harbor Kennebec River Machias River Rockport Harbor Scarboro River Union River Wells Harbor York Harbor MASSACIIUSETTS Andrews River Chatham (Stage) Harbor Cuttyhunk Harbor Essex River Green Harbor Hyannis Harbor Lagoon Pond Little Harbor Lynn Harbor Pigeon Cove Harbor Plymouth Harbor Rockport Harbor Nov/Dec 1992 Oct/Nov/Dec 1992 May/June 1993 Jan 1993 Jan 1993 Mar/Apr 1993 Jan/May/Jun/ Jul 1993 Jul 1993 Nov 1992 Oct 1992 Oct 1992 Oct 1992 Oct 1992 Feb/Mar 1993 Apr/Sep 1993 Oct 1992 Oct 1992 Oct/Nov 1992 Aug/Sep 1993 Jan/Feb/Mar 1993 Mar/Apr 1993 Oct 1992 Apr 1993 Apr 1993 Apr 1993 Jun/Jul/Aug 1993 Feb/Mar 1993 Jul/Aug 1993 Dec 1992 Dec 1992 Apr/May/Jun 1993 Jan/Feb 1993 Feb/Jul 1993 May/Jun 1993 MASSACHUSETTS (Continued) Salem Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor Weymouth Fore & Town River NEW IIAMPSHIRE Cocheco River Hampton Harbor Little Harbor Portsmouth Harbor Rye Harbor RIIODE ISLAND Block Island Bullocks Point Cove Pawtuxet Cove Point Judith Pond Seekonk River Wickford Harbor Jan/Feb 1993 May 1993 Dec 1992 Aug/Sep 1993 Mar/Apr 1993 Sep 1993 Apr/May 1993 Apr 1993 Feb/Mar/Apr/ May 1993 Sep 1993 Dec 1992 Aug/Sep 1993 Aug 1993 May 1993 Jan/Feb/May/ Jul/Aug 1993 Sep 1993 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for fiscal year 1993 were (1) monitoring surveys at the Central Long Island Sound, Western Long Island Sound, Massachusetts Bay, and Portland disposal sites (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys and (3) completion of monitoring study reports and distribution to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $712,000. Labor costs of$170,000 for program management, sampling, testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-61 TABLE 1-P RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS __ This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of Western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it exercises jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS 1 Aquatic Plant Control................................................2-3 2. East Rockaway Inlet, NY ........................................... 2-3 3. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY ................................ 2-3 4o Great South Bay, NY...............................................2-4 5. Hempstead Harbor, NY .............................................. 2-4 6. Hudson River, NY .................................................... 2-5 7. Hudson River Channel, NY & NJ........................2-6 8. Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY. .......2-6 . Long Island Intracoastal W/W, NY ........................ 2-7 10 Milton Harbor, NY ............................................. 2-7 11. Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY .......................... 2-8 12. New York and New Jersey Channels ........................ 2-8 13. New York Harbor-Collection and Rem oval of D rift ....................................................... 2-9 14. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas...............................................2-10 15. Shinnecock Inlet, NY.......................................2-10 16. Tarrytown Harbor, NY ............................................. 2-11 17. Supervisor of New York Harbor .............................. 2-11 18. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................ 2-12 19. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................2-12 20. Navigation work under special authorization..........2-12 Beach Erosion Control 21. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island NY ............................................. 2-12 22. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................... 2-12 23 Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects....................................................2-13 24 Beach erosion control work under Special authorization ........................................ 2-13 Flood Control 25 26 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY ................... 2-13 North Ellenville, NY.............................. .............. .2-15 27. Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY...............................2-15 28. Inspection of completed flood control projects.......2-16 29. Other authorized flood control projects...................2-16 30. Flood control work under special authorization................................................ 2-16 31. Emergency steambank and shoreline protection under special authorization...................2-17 General Investigations 32. 33. 34. S urveys ..................................................................... 2-17 Collection and study of basic data ........................... 2-17 Deauthorized projects...............................................2-17 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement............................2-18 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation ................................... 2-22 Table 2-C Hudson River, NY Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project...............................................2-27 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities ................................... 2-27 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ........... 2-28 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects...........2-29 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects............................ 2-31 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............................................. 2-32 Table 2-J Surveys...........................................................2-33 Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management Services .......................................................... 2-33 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ..................................... 2-33 Table 2-N Section 107 Study ........................................... 2-35 Table 2-P Section 205 Reports ........................................ 2-36 Table 2-Q Section 14 Studies and Plans and Specs........................................2-36 2-1 Navigation Page Flood Control (Cont'd) Page NIEWYUORK, NY DISTRICT REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF1 THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 2-2 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT * 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut. Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the costof the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1992 has been the eleventh year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain. Recent Work continued the removal of water chestnut from portions of the south end of the lake. The State of Vermont was able to identify alternative sources to fund the FY 1991 to 1993 Programs at no Federal cost. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,809,605. In October 1991, waterways experiment station was directed to conduct a 3-year study for $90,000 which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. Results are good, as certain organisms have tested successfully as biocontrol agents of water chestnut. The New York District is currently coordinating with the State of Vermont on cost-sharing the FY 1994 program. The proposed work plan has been expanded to include other bodies of water in the Lake Champlain Basin. 2. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel. 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including. $100,000 contributed funds (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals in Oceanside. Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the Inlet and repair of riprap jetty was awarded on 30 Sep 93. Approximately 150,000 c.y. of material is scheduled to be removed and 1800 ft. of the jetty is to be repaired. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $215,585 was expended on East Rockaway during FY '93. Contract work for this project is to be completed during FY94 Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4.250 feet tong was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 3. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY, Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 feet deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the Inlet's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way: Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and head fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Operations and results during period. The contract for dredging of the Inlet and placement of 1,200,000 cubic yards of sand on Gilgo Beach, NY, was completed in February 1993. However, due to Winter storm damage, an additional 315,000cy. of material was dredged from the inlet and placed at Gilgo Beach. This additional dredging and placement was completed in April 1993. The total of Operations and Maintenance funds expended on the project during FY93 is $3,339,004 with New York State contributing an additional $710,520 for beach placement of sand. The total of Construction General funds expended on the project in FY 93 is $5,106,640 with New York State contributing an additional $1,068,585. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 2B). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inletdredging andconsequenterosionatOak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army-for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. SinceFY 1990 therealigned channel was dredged to project depth each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. 4. GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY Location. This is a lagoon inside south shore of Long Island, N.Y. about 26 miles long and 2 to 6 miles wide. Principal entrance, through Fire Island Inlet, is about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery New York City (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. (12352) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1918, pages 1773, and 182, respectively, Existing project. A channel 200 feet Wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water from Fire Island Inlet to central basin in Great South Bay, and a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from central basin in bay to head of navigation in Patchogue River. Length of section included in project is about 19,1 miles. Mean tidal range in bay, 0.7 foot; mean range of spring tides, 0.8 foot irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 1.7 feet below mean water up to 4.6 feet above mean high water. New Work for completed project cost $226,900 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. For latest published map, see 1916 Annual Report, page 2018. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required Terminal facilities. In Great South Bay there are boat repair and storage yards, several commercial fish terminals, and ferry service to Fire Island. Many terminals have travelifts and there are public docks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. In addition to the commercial facilities there are numerous privately-owned terminals. Operations and Results during period . A contract for removal and satisfactory disposal of material lying above the plane of 10 feet mean low water was awarded on May 18, 1992. Dredging commenced on 22 May 1992 and was completed on December 4, 1992. O & M funds in the amount of$1,162,,530 was expended on Great South Bay during FY93. Additional work, the dredging of one station totaling $94,070, was performed for US Coast Guard. Additional work to provide emergency beach nourishment totaling $400,000 was performed for the State of New York. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project was commenced November 1902 and completed June 1958. Channel in Patchogue River was completed in 1904. West jetty, 1700 feet long, completed under previous project in 1897 and repaired in 1914, and east jetty formed of a sand spit, 1,000 feet long, with a riprap extension 330 feet long, completed in 1917 are in good condition. 5. HIEMPSTEAD HARBOR, NY Location. On the north shore of Long Island, 25 miles by swoauttehrw neosrtt hoefa Sstt aomf fothred Battery, New York City, and 13 miles Harbor, Conn. (Chart No. 12366.,) Previous project. For details see page 165, Annual Report for 1953. 2-4 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Existing project. (a) a channel 13 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from deep water in the harbor to North Hempstead Turnpike Viaduct, a distance of 2.1 miles; (b) thence 6 feet deep at mean low water and 50-80 feet wide to head of navigation, a distance of 0.2 miles; and (c) a turning basin off west side of channel north of Viaduct 9 feet deep at mean low water, 190 in net width and 470 feet in maximum length. Dredging the 13-foot channel is subject to the condition that no Work -shall be done by the United States within 50 feet of any established pierhead line, wharf or other structure. Section included in project is about 2.3 miles long. Mean tidal range, 7.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.3 feet above mean high water. The present work in Hempstead Harbor involves removal and disposal of derelict barges in the shallow waters along the western shore. Estimated cost is $2,465,300 federal funds and $1,232,700 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 33% of the Construction cost of the barge removal project and ensure that the area will remain free of derelict vessels after construction is completed and hold the U.S. free from damages. A local COoperation agreement was signed in Sept. 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work on the barge removal project was initiated in April 1992, resumed in Sept. 1992, and is largely completed.Final clean-up is expected by March '94 Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the navigation portion of the project was commenced March 1912 and the 6- foot channel completed October 1912, Deepening the project to 13 feet, as described above, has not been done, and has since been deauthorized. 6. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery. New York, City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343.12347,12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany. with Widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, I near Hudson and I near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2.200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of NY In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $934,000 was awarded on August 31, for removal of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of material for the Hudson River Federal Navigation Project Channel. Funds in the amount of $359,636 were expended to complete work on the continuting contract during FY 1993.In addition, Operation and Maintenance funds in the amount of $78,599 were expended on engineering, design, supervision and administration for the dredging contract during FY 1993 Government Plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year perfoming dredging design surveys and project condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and administration of $298,290 for maintenance in FY 1993. In addition, funds in the amount of $8,058 were expended during development of a long term management plan for the Hudson River Houghtaling Island dredged material placement site Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags and other 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF1 TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost including supervision and administration of $239,180 for maintenance in FY 1993, Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout fiscal year 1993 with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam, including the associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1992 navigation season on November 30 1992 and was resumed for the 1993 navigation season on May 1, 1993. Total funds expended for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated buildings and grounds, including performing instrumentation monitoring, supervision and administration was $834,200 for FY 1993. A contract in the amount of $135,774 was awarded during FY1993 for removal of exterior asbestos from the Troy Lock Operation Building. In addition, Operations & Maintenance funds in the amount of $18,468 were expended on engineering and design and supervision and administration of the contract. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. 7: HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY & NJ Location. Hudson River empties into Upper Bay of New York Harbor at the Battery, New York City. Section included under this title extends from deep water in Upper New York Bay about 14.5 miles to just north of Harlem River (Spuyten Duyvil Creek). Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938, pages 1765, and 213 respectively. Existing project. A channel 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, suitably widened at bends from West 59th Street, Manhattan, to West 40th Street thence 45 feet deep of same width to deep water in Upper Bay; a channel 40 feet deep to full width of river extending from northline of 59th Street to south side of Little Basin, and thence a channel of same depth to deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island, substantially as shown on maps in H. Doc. 309, 72d Cong., 1st sees., subject to provision that no dredging be done under project within 50 feet of pierhead lines; a channel 750 feet wide and 30 feet deep along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront; removal of a shoal on New York side between West 59th and West 61st Streets to a depth of 40 feet; and removal of an obstruction north of mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek to depth surrounding river bottom. Channel included in project is about 11 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range at the Battery, 4.4 feet, and West 129th Street, 4.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 and 4.9 feet respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery up to 6.2 feet above mean high water and at West 129th Street from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 5.3 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988. Operations and results during period. Hudson River Channel (Edgewater to Weehawken) was dredged by Hopper Dredge McFarland on 21 November 1992 to 6 December 1992 for a total of 12.5 working days. 58,419 c.y. were removed. Then the project was contracted to Weeks Marine Inc. in July 1993. The date of completion was 27 August 1993. A pay quantity of 233,987 c.y. at a cost of $841,922. The channel was again dredged by Hopper Dredge McFarland starting 20 August 1993 and continued to 25 September 1993 for a total of 24,5 working days. 151,770 c,y, were removed. For FY93 the total cost of dredging was $2,741,486 Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1913 and completed September 1952. Widening and deepening Weehawken-Edgewater Channel to project dimensions was completed in August 1937. Widening 40-foot channel for full width of river from Ellis Island to West 59th Street, Manhattan, was completed in March 1939. Widening 48-foot project to full project width of 2,000 feet from West 40th Street to West 59th Street was completed in November 1950. Deepening 45-foot channel for a width of 2,000 feet from Upper Bay to West 40th Street was completed to project dimensions in September 1952. 8. KILL VAN KULL- NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, NJ & NY Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning 2-6 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $310,000,000 With an additional $194,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to40 feet in six contracts, Is Underway. Contract No.1, awarded in June 1987, is coinm- Pleted. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is COmpleted. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is Completed. Contract No.4 is planned to remove rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay. This work is divided in three contracts, 4A,4B and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and is scheduled for completion in April 1994. Contract 4B was awarded in August 1993 and is scheduled for completion in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. Sampling & testing of bottom sediments in the Port Elizabeth area of Newark Bay showed Some dioxin contamination. 9. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south Side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at the eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the South end of Shinnecock Canal. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at Mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock ranal, Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock bay to 0.7 foot in tatchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric Pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are boat repair and storage yards Within the area immediately adjacent to the federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future traffic warrants. Operations and results during period. A contract for removal and satisfactory disposal of material lying above the plane of 6 feet below mean low water was awarded on August 14, 1992. Dredging commenced on September 29, 1992 and was completed on June 22 1993. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $2,793,183 were expended on Long Island Intracoastal Waterway during FY93. Additional work, totalling $369,581 was performed for the U.S. Coast Guard as part of this project. This work consisted of the maintenance dredging of three USCG stations. Condition as of September 30. Original work under the existing project was commenced October,1939 and completed September 1940 10. MILTON HARBOR, N.Y. Location. A cove on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 29 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 1.12 miles long from 6 foot contour in the outer harbor; thence a branch channel 70 and 50 feet, 0.17 mile long; all with depths of 6 feet at mean low water. Mean tidal range, 7.2 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.2 feet. Project report was authorized May 14, 1964 and project was authorized by the Chief of Engineers April 23, 1965, pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Federal cost for completed new work is $151,373 exclusive of $119,276 required contributed funds furnished by the State of New York. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute 47 percent of the first cost of dredging and furnish assurances that they will pay the entire cost of dredging proposed marina extension and deepening existing marina: provided lands, easements, and rights-of-way forconstruction and future maintenanceof project and aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance; provided and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in related project areas; provide and maintain necessary mooring facilities and utilities including public parking areas open to all equally; maintain a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth and development of the harbor facilities with the understanding that these facilities will be open to all equally. Terminal Facilities. There are two marinas, one boat yard and one boat repair yard in the inner harbor, and one boat club on Long Island Sound. Except for one public marina, all facilities are privately owned. 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY O1 THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded January 22, 1993 for the removal and disposal of all material, except ledge rock lying above the plane of 6 feet below mean low water, in the specified areas of Milton Harbor, New York. Work commenced February 8, 1993 and was completed March 25, 1993. A total of 60,315 cubic yards were removed from the federal navigation channel and disposed of at the EPA designated Mud Dump site within the Atlantic Ocean. The cost for this maintenance dredging cycle was $1,110,002. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1967 and physically completed June 1967. 11. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY &VT Location. This waterway. 37 miles long, comprises southem end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point. N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in the removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $22,058.. Government plant and hired labor were employed in the replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $3,500 Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $13,884 were expended in FY 1992 on surveys and funds in the amount of $11,838 were expended in FY 1993 on project condition surveys.. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have. been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 12. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12 331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pares 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing, north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line: and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is .30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at eastern the end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5. 1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Location cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. 2-8 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Terminal facilities. See Port Series No.5, revised 1988, Vol. 2. Operations and resultsduring period. An engineeringand design effort for New York and New Jersey Channels was conducted during this period to determine the feasibility to perform dredging in Arthur Kill Channel. The total cost of the E&D effort in FY93 was $442,821. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 13. NEW YORK IIARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $267,000,000 (October 1993 P.L.) including $62,500,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $80,000,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate then as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date) A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,211. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Working along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work is completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 and Jersey City North Contract No.2. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North I was completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2A, Brooklyn Reach 2B, the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, the Passaic River Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 544,350 cubic feet (4,253 cords ) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structures was accomplished at a cost of $4,217,727 in FY 1993. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty StatePark, theCity of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weekawken and Edgewater. The New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. Removal work is scheduled for the remaining debris in the Weehawken- Edgewater Reach, and in the Brooklyn 2A Reach. 14. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330. miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass, and 165 miles northeA,,,t of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds about 5.7 miles long and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35- foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel alon9 New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long. extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol.2. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company in July 1993 to dredge Main Ship Channel. Work commenced September 1993 and was completed October 1993. Approximately 363,000 c.y. of material were removed at a total project cost of $2,101,700. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2.000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600- foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was competed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47- foot depth in November 1977. 15.. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery. New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide with a deposition basin, thence extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about mile 0.7 thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile: rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is S22,300.000 of which the Federal share is $16.900,000 and non-Federal share is $5.400.000. Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first cost allocation of 69 percent Federal and 31 percent non- Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the dredging element of the project was executed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on 7 Jsturnuec ti9o0n. Aph Lasoec aol f Cwooorpke rwaatiso n Agreement for the jetty recon- executed on Dec 10,1991. 2-10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public fishing facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnccock Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the fishermen. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded on March 31, 1992 for Jetty Repair and maintenance dredging for Shinnecock Inlet. Jetty repair commenced on May 21, 1992 and is continuing. Maintenance dredging was completed on May 11 1993. A total of 500,000 c.y. was removed at a contract cost of $1,650,040; of which $784,400 was Operations and Maintenance funds. Condition as of September 30. The initial dredging and first maintenance dredging of the channel has been completed. Work is proceeding on the jetty re-construction project and also maintenance dredging of the channel. 16. TARRYTOWN HARBOR, NY Location. Extends along east shore of Hudson River for about 1 mile below Kingsland Point, 29 miles above the Battery, New York City. Existing project. A channel along wharf front of the harbor 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide, and northerly and southerly connections with deep water in Hudson River of same depth and 150 feet wide; total length,about 1 mile. Mean tidal range, 3.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 3.7 feet; extreme range due to wind and barometric pressure, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations are infrequent and do not materially affect navigation. New work for completed project cost $69,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals with a total available dockage of about 3,000 feet of are along the waterfront. Railroad connections are adjacent to the waterfront. Terminals are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. -Under a continuing contract for maintenance dredging to restore project depth, of 12 feet, work commenced on 22 September 1992 and was completed on October 19 1992 with the removal of a total 109,069 cubic yards, place measurement of material. Operations & Maintenance funds in the amount of $850,000 was expended on this project during FY93. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project commenced in April and was completed in July 1937. Controlling depth mean low water (Oct-Nov. 1965) was 12 feet for 150 feet width in southerly connecting channel, then 12 feet for 250 feet width in the channel along the wharf, then 12 feet for a width varying from 250 to 150 feet in northerly channel. 17. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District. was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3. 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well as investigating unauthorized construction activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 18. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 20. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) BEACH EROSION CONTROL 21. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, N.Y. City. Existing project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides,for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. The estimated project construction cost is $144,780,000 (Oct 1992. P.L.). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. The local agreement has not been finalized, but the customary provisions are that local interests will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. The General Design Memo was approved in '92. The record of decision for the EIS was signed in July '93The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed by the State of New York in Sep. '93. Construction start is anticipated in Feb '94. 22. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Bamegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670 authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section I is $620,900,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $331,600,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and outfall drainage extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been signed by the State of New Jersey. It is anticipated that construction will begin in late winter of '93. The State of New Jersey has completed reconstructing the seawall. 2-12 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT SECTION II-- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the Year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated cost is $236,500,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The project is in active planning status. A final General Design Memo was submitted for approval on Sept 30 1993. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Publ .Law 826, 84th congress as amended (None during FY 1993) FLOOD CONTROL 25. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y. about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: Widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing not to exceed 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights of way and borrow areas, and furnish 30 percent of the project costs. The most recent letter of intent received from NYSDEC is dated Apr 23, 1993. A history of the project follows: On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches-Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances wereexecutedby State of New Yorkon April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches- Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach, The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (Drainage structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested the following works undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches- Shinnecock reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groin in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches- Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report. Planning was completed for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach consisting of placement of beach and dune fill in the initial 11 groin field constructed in 1966 and along the 9,500 feet of shore westward of the existing groin field. The draft Environmental Impact Statement on the entire project was revised and a final Environmental Impact Statement prepared for review and approval prior to submission to the Council on Environmental Quality. At the request of the local cooperating agency a Phase I design study was initiated in the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project. This was terminated June 6, 1978 when the Council on Environmental Quality recommended the project be reformulated, Active scoping for reformulation began in July 1979. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and the project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370.191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2. Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section lA and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section lA was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 required contributed funds. Planning for another increment of work at Westhampton Beach underway, Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase 1 study in Reach 1, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. Environmental Impact Statement on entire project prepared. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978 Department of the Interior supported by the other agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6 1978 the Council agreed and recommended project reformulation. Subsequent to strong objections on project's the final Environmental Impact Statement, meetings were held in September 1978, January and July 1979 with Department of Interior, Environmental Protection Agency and other interested Federal agencies. Subsequently, the Federal agencies have agreed to a basis for the reformulation of the Fire Island to Montauk Point project including a general agreement on the studies necessary to answer the outstanding concerns. Public meetings were held in October 1979 in order to delineate the full scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was submitted in July 1980. Reformulation will result in a new General Design Memorandum. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at West Hampton Beach, reformulation was postponed. Two breaches (new inlets) have occurred in the vulnerable Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in 1979, and the most recent in Dec 1992. Both breaches were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sep 1993. 2-14 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT At present coordination is proceeding with the State to construct a project that would provide increased protection for the Westhampton area on an interim basis, while the entire project is reformulated. Sand fill would be provided to the existing groin field, and additional sand would be placed west of the groins to nourish the eroded beach and reestablish a dune area. 26. NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, at their confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanoch, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). Existing project. Improvement includes construction of levees and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, channel improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providiog interior drainage including diversion ditches drainage Structures, ponding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating Structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. Since that time severe storms in March 1980 and April 1987 caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant damage to the project floodwalls and levees, Subsequent repairs to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981-82 and in 1987-88 under PL-84-99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report has been prepared and submitted to Office of Chief of Engineers. The recommended plan for design deficiency correction in- Volves repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined floodwalls, placement of riprap protection along the Beer Kill Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current Federal cost estimate is $6,100,000 (Oct. 93-P.L.) Local cooperation. Assurances of Local Cooperation were received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 of the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (the non Federal share of the cost to correct the deficiency will be the same as at the time the project was authorized and constructed). Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. The project Design Memorandum is under review, and preparation of Plans and Specs has begun. Construction has not been initiated. 27. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, NJ., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were. authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988. 2-15 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Section 101 (a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 102 (p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls, channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. Condition as of September 30. Preconstruction Engineering and design for the Passaic River Flood Protection Project was initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with data gathering and technical analyses to preparea General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impart Statement with accompanying project cost estimate. A draft report is scheduled for completion in 1995. Engineering and design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area project element, Consisting of environmental and streambank restoration measures in the city of Newark, is also ongoing. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of the following completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. New England Adams, MA - Hoosic River Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River North Adams, MA - Hoosic River Richford, VT - Missiquoi River Waterbury Dam, VT - Little River Wrightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, Winooski River' Inspection Date Sept93 Sept 93 Sept93 Sept93 Sept93 Sept 93 Sept93 Sept93 NY - NJ Areas *E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Nov 92 Elizabeth, NJ - Elizabeth River Aug 93 *Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY Nov 92 Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk RiverOct92 Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek Oct 92 Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River Oct 92 Kingston, NY - Esopus Creek Oct 92 North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills & Sandburg Creek Oct 92 Rahway, NJ - Rahway River Aug 93 *Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Aug 93 Twp, Keanburg & Middletown, NJ - Aug 93 *Liberty State Park, NJ Aug 93 Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek Oct 92 So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek & Mohawk River Oct 92 So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River Aug 93 Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River Nov 92 Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River Nov 92 Ardsley, NY Nov 92 * Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong as amended (Pre-authorization) Table (See 2-p at end of chapter) Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activi- ties. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons from Hurricane Andrew, attented meeting and seminars dealing with emergency response plan and purchased supplies and equip- ment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District conducted field investigations, provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county government in response to the major December '92 Nor'easter and the March '93 Blizzard. In addition the New York District investigated advance measures requests from New York State for repair of seriously eroded coastal areas of Staten Island, New York City, and the barrier 2-16 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT island at Westhampton Beach, Suffolk County as a result of the December coastal storm. Pursuant to Public Law 93-228 the New York District provided assistance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in connection with the December '92 Nor'caster diseaster recovery operation in New York and New Jersey. 31. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526,79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 32. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $78,910 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 34 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See-Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to FV02IfTW FY9 FY9 beV3O199 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. 3. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 4. Great South Bay, N.Y. 5. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. 6. HudsonRiver,N.Y. 7. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Week Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 140,000 129,117 836,820 834,653 132,000 24,310 368,000 370,296 20,000 14,007 24,000 38,938 1,909,806 1,848,003 2 83,969 * 533,334 358,003 250,000 10,655,560 357,062 215,585 10,620,199 3,341,000 125,000 5,404,000 9,464,360 " 3,299,572 336,775 5,404,775 9,634,719 1,556,555 50,000 1,558,999 51,410 1,420,103 2,710,000 19,490,050 1,414,825 2,715,271 19,556,775 266,800 266,887 100,000 100,000 200,000 290,582 360,000 357,369 270,000 2,508,000 287,054 337,348 1,160,000 2,903,670 1,162,533 2,903,601 3,434,470 1,297,587 2,595,736 76,497 76,497 44,-249,800 6.7 44,249,865 2,384,226 2,545,000 3,926,911 2,392,670 2,544,978 3,922,485 2,057,000 48,610,450 89 2,050,837 48,489,466 6,771,870 6,771,870 " 45,000 44,939 640,000 640,060 2,800,002 2,776,000 31,526,640 2,799,533 2,741,486 31,491,653 2-18 Projects Funding FY 90 FY 91 FV09 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY92 FY 93 September 30, 1993 8. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y. 9. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 10. Milton Harbor 11. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 12. New York and New, Jersey Channels 13. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift 14. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas New work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16,300,000 12,792,000 51,139,000 32,549,000 179,398,000 22,826,306 12,109,869 56,699,017 24,656,202 171,116,600 235,964 235,964 222 222 245,002 244,996 680,006 2,783,000 11,657,880 669,820 2,793,184 11,670,586 151,373 151,373 31,250 31,248 64,396 64,854 40,000 39,498 40,000 39,999 40,002 40,002 1,110,000 2,177,250 1,110,002 2,167,268 41,000 37,432 681,811 10 681,811 1,383,090 1,319,493 - - - - 73,052,435 ,. - - - - 73,052,435 2,039,022 1,690,000 989,161 450,000 15,470,540 1,948,728 2,078,515 987,366 442,821 49,810,656 19 700,000 2,400,000 2,200,000 2,800,000 48,460,000 2,424,393 2,339,547 1,236,350 1,721,084 34,495,299 13 3,368,662 3,976,000 4,564,788 4,199,100 80,430,250 3,375,831 3,980,579 4,542,752 4,217,727 80,693,564 - - - - 45,009,710 - - - - 45,009,710 14 5,192,886 4,827,000 3,520,856 6,152,000 67,939,170 5,223,871 4,838,456 3,499,950 6,115,320 70,710,325 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-A Projects COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT. -~F9F unding --- FY91-- Total Cost to FY92 FY 93 September 30, 1993 15. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 16. Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. 17. Supervisor of New York Harbor 21. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), N.Y. 22. Sandy Hook to Bamegat Inlet, N.J. 25. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 26. North Ellenville. N.Y. 27. Passaic River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work. Aprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,226,000 1,613,738 3,537,000 1,20.4,480 1,742,111 4,800,000 13,817,000 6,528,484 11,342,814 550,000 780,000 545,596 784,402 1,330,000 1,329,993 69,840 69,836 595,055 599,054 531,000 587,483 35,000 34,803 605,000 601,729 825,000 724,140 220,197 850,000 220,195 850,000 1,536,400 1,536,197 822,457 760,000 32,857,960 814,078 768,380 33,337,710 750,000 100,000 3,391,000 474,996 304,675 3,148,381 1,613,000 1,354,000 2,000,000 100,000 13,202,000 1,305,100 1,246,343 1,042,781 1,021,129 12,518,002 80,000 - 29,163 300,000 83,290 - 6,284,000 16,315,000 145,412 2,923,715 16,636,211 12 113,973 143,753 350,000 176,000 431,670 270,000 200,000 4,966,450 197,900 286,977 4,817,197 3,900,000 5,800,000 7,145,000 10,005,000 46,686,700 3,975,359 4,605,177 7,497,720 5,036,497 40,716,887 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Includes $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $ 1 00,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 5. Includes $39,465 expended for previous project. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81.373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 2-20 FY 90 FY 91 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONT'D) 9. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 10. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 11. .Includes $69,629 for new work for previous projects and $668,820 expended from public works funds. 12. Includes $3,788,340 contributed funds. 13. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in 0 & M funds.) 14. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 15. 16. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects. 17. Includes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $22, 861 incurred in FY 1963 to be transferred to construction of Staten Island Rapid Transit Bridge during FY 1971. 18. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023, 308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 19. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, NY. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State funds were $200,000 in 1990 and $581,000 in 1991. 2-21 TABLE 2-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document River and Harbor Act of 1959 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17,1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act June 13,1902 June 25, 1910 August 13, 1968 W.R. D. A. of 1986 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of waterchestnut EAST ROCKAWAY INLIET, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches GREAT SOUTH BAY, N.Y. (See Section 4 of text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Fire Island Inlet to central basin in Great South Bay. Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from central basin to head of navigation in Patchogue River. HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 6 deep, 50-80 feet wide Channel 13 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and turning basin 9 feet deep. (Deauthorized in 1990) Removal of derelict barges H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doe 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doe. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.. H. Doe. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 103, 56th Cong., 2nd sess.. Rivers & Harbors Com. Doc. 1, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 2-22 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 25, 19 1 0 March 3, 1925 July 3. 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 March 4, 1913 March 4, 1915 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1925 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. HUDSON RIVER CIIANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 30 feet deep from Ellis Island to Neward St., 40 feet deep through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point and channel 26 by 550 feet along Wechawken-Edgewater waterfront. Remove shoal east side of river between West 19th and West 32nd Sts.; remove rock near Battery to 40 feet; remove obstruction near Spuyten Duyvil Creek. Additional dredging through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point. Remove shoal between West 32nd and West 6]st Sts. to 40 feet and widen 40 foot channel between the Battery and Canal St. to 2.000 feet. Channel 30 by 750 feet along Wechawken-Edgewater waterfront. Modification of conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 40 feet deep between pierhead lines from 20th St., Manhattan, to a point 1,300 feet below Newark St. Hoboken, thence 2,800 feet wide to deep water off Ellis Island. Channel 30 feet deep between 40 foot channel and channel along Jersey City waterfront. Widen 40 foot channel to full width of river from north line of 59th St. to south side of Little Basin, thence a channel of same depth to deep water off Ellis Island. Waiver all conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 45 and 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1914, pp. 234-235 H. Doc. 1697, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 313, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 450, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 309, 72th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 72 Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 2-23 TABLE 2-B Act Document REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. (PL99-98) August 26, 1937 July 14 1960 August 8, 1917 September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17. 1950 October 27, 1965 March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 Work Authorized KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATER, N.Y. (Sea Section 9 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. MILTON HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance channel 6 feet dccp and 100 ft. wide; inner channel 60 and 50 feet width and Branch channel 70 and 50 feet width, all in 6 feet depth. NARROWS OF, LAKE CHIAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEW YORK AND JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 12 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet D Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 13 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore Structures. P.L. 91-611, 91 st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. 2-24 TABLE 2-B Document H. Doc. 181, 75th Cong., I st sess. Chief of Engineers Section 107 1960 R&H Act Public Law 86-645 H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee )oc. 17, 71 st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 233, 8 1 st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 108,98th Cong., I st sess. NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8. 1917 August 8. 1917 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3,1905 NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 14 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feetdee( for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal SIHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. (See Section 15 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep and I 00 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. TARRYTOWN HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide in approach arms, and 150 feet wide along waterfront. Widening channel to 150 feet in approach arms and 250 feet along waterfront. Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc- 159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., I st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act H. Doc. 283,56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 262 72nd Cong., I st sess 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. (See Section 21 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. 2-25 TABLE 2-B Act Document - --- ----- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document July 3. 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act 1960 River and Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 22 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y. (See Section 25 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of the first costs. H. Doc. .332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. modified by Appr. Act for Energy & Water Dev. for FY 85 H. Doc. 425, 86th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H. R. 10203 1986 and 1992 Water Resources Development Acts NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 26 of Text) 1962 Flood Control Act Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, 1990 Water Resources interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. Development Act PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. (See Section. 27 of Text) 1976 and 1990 Water Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation Resource>Development of plans for flood control and water resource management. Acts. S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL-84-99 H .Rpt .94 - 1902 2-26 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 t 13.0 feet TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Section 17 of Text) Statement of Activities-FY 1993 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Other misc. f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1993 2-27 TABLE 2-C 212 197 2 409 206 292 413 45 36 146 2 62 249 540 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1993 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY K eyport H arbor...............................................................................S .e.p .9.3.................................... Shrewsbury River ............................................................................................................. Nov 92 S hark R iver.......................................'00. . .. . ........................... *.................................. A ug 93 S hoal H arbor......................................... ....................... .- * *...................................Aug 93 NEW YORK B row ns C reek....... ............... ................................................................................................. O ct 92 Coney Island Channel.............................................................................Sep 93 Eastchester Creek....................................................... ................................... Aug 93 East Rockaway Inlet... .............. ...................................... ..... Dec 92 & Feb & May 93 E ast R iver.............................................. ... ... ......... . ........................................................................... Sep 93 H udson R iver Channel........... .............. ......... .......................... .................. ........................................... Sep 93 Jamaica Bay ........................................... ...... ............. ................Aug 93 Jones Inlet ................................... .......................................... ........................ Dec 92 New York Harbor a. Am brose Channel............. ................. ...................................... **** ****..... ............................ Aug 93 b. Liberty Island Anchorage ............... 0. ...................... ...... Sep 93 c. M ain Ship Channel ............................................. ...................... *. . ............... ............... Apr 93 d. NJ Pierhead Channel .......................................................................................................................... Sep 93 e Sandy H ook Channel ................................. ....................... ....................................... .. ........... Dec 93 New York & New Jersey Channels a. Arthur Kill.....................................................................................................*********............................. Jan 93 b. Perth A m boy A nchorage ................................................................................................ Jan 93 c. R aritan B ay ........................................................................... ........ ............... A ug 93 Port Chester Harbor.... . ............................... ................................... .......... .. ..... Sep 93 Gravesend Bay .............................................. .................................................... *. **.................................. Dec 92 M oriches B ay ......................................... . ......... ................................... ....o...........o................ MM a..y.. ..9.3... M attituck Harbor ............................................. ............................................. ***............................... .... Jan 93 Shinnecock Inlet ................... ............................................................ ............. *..** o.................. Jan & M ay 93 Total cost of Reconnaissance and condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1993 was $1,361,884 2-28 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT For Last Full Report See Annual Projects Report For Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY Buttermilk Channel, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT. Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY East Chester Creek, NY East River, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Flushing Bay and Creek, NY Glen Cove Creek, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, N.Y. Greenport Harbor NY Harlem River, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Jamaica Bay, NY Jones Inlet, NY Keyport Hatbor, NJ Lake Montauk Harbor, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroreck Harbor, NY Mattituck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ Moriches Inlet, N.Y. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. Newtown Creek, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. Northport Harbor, N.Y. Peconic River, N.Y. Peckskill Harbor, N.Y. Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. Raritan River, Nj Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, N.J. Rondout Harbor NY Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sag Harbor, N.Y. Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 1992 1990 1991 1987 1966 1909 1953 1973 1992 1991 1953 1992 1986 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1953 1969 1953 1992 1990 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1990 1984 1990 1989 1986 1971 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 1989 1895 1964 1985 Cost to Sept 30, 1993 Construction $5,523,297 45,590,201 3 1,149,946 12 33,5976 706,414 9 31,000 40,000 111,371 592,056 32,723,662 13 64,584 2,102,905 29,760 34,1750 346,831 18,000 137,301 33,562,640 20 74,681 3,616,119 91,08117 4,545,753 1,822,530 4 40,475 791,680 14 76,065 1,741,210 19 513,764 177,925 1 21,000 7,725,843 29,014,500 1,168,354 73,214 s 78,644 25,000 19,400 198,415 433,479 69,40625 221,128 1,551,470 810,500 142,437 98,468 121,805 26 508,936 2-29 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Operation & Maintenance 41,100,315 5,129,007 3,802,517 673,369 303,555. 1,288 375,274 423,148 3,040,770 5,935,215 21,571 7,673,802 130,760 115 394,004 292,919 88,029 457 21,720 493,491 57,527 8,852,032 14,528,616 1,417,437 1,388,153 267,768 537 1,351,086 1,482,832 315,613 101,840 25,771,367 11,760,745 212,411 615487 116,500 66,037 256,415 1,742,097 1,299 359,294 16,234,008 3,965,631 3,185,437 249 11,710 4,002,330 ft-- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (CONT'D) Cost to Sept 30, 1993 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, N.J. 1991 56,479 679,916 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT 1917 3,125 385 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. 1988 81,905 18 429,180 Shark River, N.J. 1987 150,000 1,304,638 Sheepshead Bay. N.Y. 1948 33,828 64,078 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. 1990 124,572 7 1,822,938 Shrewsbury River, N.J. 1992 1,145,457 5,815,178 Staten Island.Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, N.Y. 1973 7,730,476 Sumpawanus (Babylbn Creek) Inlet, N.Y. 1895 7,000- Wallabout Channel, N.Y. 1953 18,174 36,312 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. 1950 13,000 44,691 Washington Canal and South River, NJ 1953 206,116 3 212,827 Westchester Creek, NY 1992 175,933 5,209,343 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. 1953 48,823 178,398 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 4. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 5. Excludes $34,580 from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Includes. S 17,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes. $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,41-5,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 11. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,197,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and,$31,454 to be contributed. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. 30. 31. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. 2-30 NEWIV YORK, NY DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Projects Atlantic.Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet 1 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay. N.Y. (Part 1) Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 2 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1959 1989 1981 Cost to Sept 30, 1993 Construction Operation & Maintenance $25,271,010 18,044,667 217,900 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec 22) 2. Listed since as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec 3) 2-31 TABLE 2-H11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-1 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.' Ardsley, N.Y. Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn." 3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' Elizabeth, N.J. Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin. N.Y.' Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams .56 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. Missisquoi River at Richford, Vtl3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. Rahway. N.J. Rahway. South Branch, N.J. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, N.J. Rosendale, N.Y. Sandburg, Creek. Spring Glen, N.Y. Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh. N.Y. South Amsterdam, Mohawk River. N.Y.' South Ellenville. N.Y. South Orange, N.J. Staten Island. N.Y. Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. 1.3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River. Vt. Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers, N.Y. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1964 1990 1959 1963 1985 1973 1956 1939 1990 1965 1968 1971 1979 1981 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 Cost to Sept 30, 1993 Operation & 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $213.507 emergency relief funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Includes $622,817 contributed funds. 2-32 Construction Maintenance 6,282,307 2 5,527,219 363,515 2,898,334 54,374,070 1,249,530 9 1,064,626 17,888,670 238,169 15,572,988 7 973,142 8 15,863,723 11,061,256 262 3,684,966 109,702 62,917 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 644,998 142,075 1,438,845 8,200 5,897,427 1,549,929 113,754,475 10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Study Class Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Special Studies 2 TOTAL i. Includes Sec 933 and 934 studies. 2. Includes review of authorized projects, Intra Army water resources, Nat'l Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, Planning Ass't to States, Hurricane Trans study, Community Ass't Progr. FEMA TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class Flood Plain Technical Services Flood Plain Management Unit TOTAL TABLE 2.J SURVEYS FY 93 Cost $384,135 3,007,506 916,998 289,153 4,597,792 FY 93 Cost $66,795 12,115 78,910 2-33 _ _ ~ I--- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF T1E ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHIORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date See Annual And Projects Report For Authority Federal Funds Expended Construction Contributed Operation Funds and Expended Maintenance Bennington. VT (1936 & 41 Acts) Bronx River, N.Y. Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 46 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (1950 Act) East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. I East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 11) Elizabeth, N.J. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. Hempstead Harbor, NY (68-Act) 14 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 Ft, 27 Ft)18 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, Vt. Lemon Creek, NY Manhasset Bay, NY Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, N.J. 16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels 4,18 Orowoc Creek, NY. Otter Creek, Vt. Perth Amboy, N.J. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 2.3 Port Jefferson Hbr. N.Y. (1890,1930 & 68 Acts) Rahway River, N.J. 6.7- Raritan River, N.J.4-6 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6.7, Rutland, Otter Creek, VT Sag Harbor, N.Y. (Channel) 1 Shooters Island, N.J. & N.Y. * Shrewsbury River, NJ. (1950 & 1965 Act) Swanton Harbor, V1P Ticonderoga River, N.Y. 1-6 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7.8 Waterford. N.Y. 6.7 Waycake Creek, NJ Westchester Creek, N.Y. 4 1974 1981 1980 1953 1952 1992 1963 1976 1948 1966 1989 1982 1953 1947 1939 1937 1948 1984 1979 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug.1982 Jul 1992 Aug. 1977 1988 Aug.1977 Aug. 1977 Jan 1990 Aug. 1987 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1988 1988 1988 Jan 1990 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 3,503,969 13 60,481 165,882 49,035 49,837 670,000 1,159,946 33,976 8 40,000 69,489 100,000 1,185,365 60,481 165,882 4-1 39,468 68,5814,5 49,837 6,621 21,000 .. 12 10,000 829,421 19,546 1,947,853 505,369 30,675 1,622 59,391 2,455 76,497 51,566 1,621 4,636 257,237 1982 Aug. 1982 1982 1949 1937 1966 1967 1977 1948 1981 1959 1963 1964 1992 1888 1895 1951 1939 1949 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Jan. 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Oct. 1992 Jul 1992 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1982 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 433,470 4 37,000 4 1,617,470 15 7,000 211,015 70,500 16,500 9,253 2,781 175,933 66,000 441,656 307 10,113,903 235 1.260 - 2,921,311 2-34 4,951 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-M (Continued) No Commerce reported. Completed. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." Uncomplete portion deauthorized. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed and $31,454 to be contributed. Inactive. Entire project deauthorized. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. Removal for navigation. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. Deepening project to 13 feet. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 1912 authorization. 1935 authorization. 1910 construction dikes. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 Project FY 93 Cost CONTINUE FEASIBILITY STUDY Belford Harbor N.J. 2-35 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 Project FY 93Cost INITIATE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Poplar Brook, Monmouth Co. NJ $8,100 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Mill Brook,-Highland Park, N.J. $489 CONTINUE COORDINATION OF MITIGATION PLANS Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. $148,324 CONTINUE COORDINATION FOR CONSTRUCTION Ramapo River, Monroe, NY $1,112 Yonkers, Nepera Park, NY $23,312 COORDINATE SPECIAL HTRW REPORT Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY $31,212 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 Project FY 93 Cost INITIATE FEASIBILITY STUDY Atlantic Village, Staten Island, NY $3,636 COTINUE FEASIBILITY STUDY Asharoken Village, Northport, NY $37,280 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATION Green Brook (Regional Center), NJ 2-36 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ .... ............ ..... 3-2 2. Cedar Creek, NJ...................................... ... 3-2 3. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE..........3-2 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ .... ......................... 3-3 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ ............ 3-3 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea...........................................3-4 7. Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ...................3-5 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE ................................ 3-5 9. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD............................3-5 10. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE................................................ 3-6 11. Manasquan River, NJ................................................ 3-7 12. M ispillion River,DE ............................................... 3-7 13. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ ............................................. 3-8 14. M urderkill River, DE..............................................3-8 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway...........................3-8 16. Salem R iver, N J.......................................................3-9 17. Schuylkill River, PA............................................... 3-10 18. Toms River, NJ ....................................................... 3-10 19. Wilmington Harbor, DE ......................................... 3-11 Beach Erosion Control Page 20. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ.................................................. 3-11 Flood Control Local Protection Page 21. Beltzville Lake, PA............................................. .3-12 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA .............................................. 3-12 23. Delaware Coast Protection, DE .............................. 3-13 24. Navigation Work Under Special A uthorization ......................................................... 3-13 25. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization ......................................................... 3-13 26. Emergency Bank Protection...................................3-13 27. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA .................................... 3-13 28. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ......................................................... 3-14 29. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ.................................................3-14 30. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................................................3-15 31. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees.......................... 3-15 32. Prompton Lake, PA.................................................3-15 33. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys................................................................... 3-16 34. National Emergency Preparedness ......................... 3-16 General Investigations 35. 36. 37. Page Surveys.................................................................. 3-16 Collection and Study of Basic Data........................ 3-16 Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ............... 3-16 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement .................. 3-17 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation...........................3-21 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................................3-27 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects......................... 3-29 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................................... 3-29 TABLE 3-F Deauthorized Projects............................. 3-30 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 k REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS AC'Ti I tI FOIR 1993 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main the entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations would be placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included supervision and administration for South Jetty. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, and supervision and administration. Dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge Currituck was accomplished from November 5, 1992 to December 6, 1992, from March 11, 1993 to May 11, 1993, and from July 15, 1993 to August 14, 1993 removing a total of 281,744 cubic yards of material at a total of $910,781. 20 CEDAR CREEK, NJ Location: In the northeastern corner of Sussex County DE, approximately five miles east of the Town of Milford. The area is accessible via State Route 36. Existing project: Cedar Creek, with headwaters in Sussex County, meanders northward through coastal salt marsh to its terminus at Mispillion River. The creek currently ranges in depth from 13 feet below mean low water at the Route 36 bridge to less than 5 feet at several locations. The channel width varies from ap- proximately 75 feet to 250 feet. Tidal range in the lower reaches of the creek is approximately 4 feet. Existing project was adopted by the Chief of Engineers, 10 De- cember 1979 under the small navigation program, section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: Five marinas are located along the lower stretch of the creek, with residential areas being situated near the Delaware Bay shore. The area is sparsely populated, and there are no major metropolitan areas nearby. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, BCR updates, and supervision and administration. 3. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge will carry the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and will be located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. Previous project: None. Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware" approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of $115,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included a stability analysis. Maintenance, contract: Work included reimbursement to state of Delaware for construction of St. Georges Bridge Replacement. 4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30,1993.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included repair of jetty, supervision and administration, and plans and specifications. Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Schweizer was accomplished from September 13, 1993 to September 23, 1993 and from March 8, 1993 to March 22, 1993 removing a total of 106,792 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $187,200. 5. DEIAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S.Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 3-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included enviromental monitoring of Duck Island. There was also dredging by NATCO Limited Partnership Company from January 26, 1993 to February 20, 1993 removing a total of 207,744 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $858,747. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys of Duck Island, BCR update, environmental monitoring, general maintenance, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938 Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel.to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys, construction of dikes and sluices, lease of equipment. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by Norfolk Dredging Company from October 1, 1992 to January 22, 1993 and from September 16, 1993 to September 30, 1993 removing a total of 4,282,840 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $5,257,790. Dredging was also accomplished by Weeks Marine Incorporated removing a total of 200,000 cubic yaat rad sto otaf lm caotset rial from July 26, 1993 to October 15, 1993 of $2,199,396. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance on disposal areas, environmental and well testing and monitoring, preparation of arch site, pipelines, conditions and operations study, construction of subdrainage and BCR update. Work on spot 3-4 PIHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT shoals, drainage, construction of dikes and sluices, disposal ditching, and plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration was also accomplished. There was also maintenance dredging by the Government dredge McFarland from June 23, 1993 to August 20, 1993 removing a total 432,154 cubic yards material at a total cost of $2,553,943. 7. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ Location: Camden, NJ, on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite the city of Philadelphia, PA. It is about 51 miles above mouth of the river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at the mouth of Delaware Bay. ( See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project, for further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: The existing project which is a modification to the Delaware River from Philadelphia to the Sea project was adopted as House Document No. 63-1120 in 1919 and modified by House Document No. 70-111 in 1930 and House Document No. 77-353 in 1945. Dredging to project depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine Terminal was completed in March 1988. It also provides for dredging in of Camden to Newton Creek, with the depth increased to 40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal. These depths extend from the ship channel in Delaware River to a line parallel with and 50 feet distant from the established pierhead line. The project length is about four miles. Projects depths are well maintained in 30 foot depth section of channel. Work is scheduled to initiate dredging the project depth of 40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal in FY 1992. Estimate cost for New Work (October 1990) is Federal, $4,500,000 and non-Federal, $1,500,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: New Work, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration, engineering and design. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steelsheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included stabilization study. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included engineering and design. 9. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects 3-5 AEPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad, bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep;dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed-n June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was 'completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $139,000,000 and non-federal cost $17,189,000 (October 1990). Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet.east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-ofway required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance, ditching and draining of disposal area, monitoring, bridge inspection, night lighting. There was also maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from November 13, 1992 to January 22, 1993 removing a total of 748,874 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,915,860. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance of rip-rap and bridges, archeaology study, repair roadways, monitoring of stabilization banks, night lighting, locks, and grounds. Also included in work was drainage of disposal areas, lease of equipment, bridge inspections, dispatch, surveys, environmental monitoring, snagging and clearing, plans and specifications, mosquito control, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 10. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly sex County, DE It extends part of Sus- 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) rouPtree vfioorumse dp roaj epcat:r tA o cfa nal along a slightly different projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun n 1886 and abandoned in 1905. 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance hired labor: Work included survey on maintenance dredging and rehabilitation of jetties and supervision and administration. IL MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ Location: This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous project: For details see Annual report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project: A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5 acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of Route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10 and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10 and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Restoration of bulkheads completed 16 August 1965 at a cost of $117,807. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19-acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5-acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive catagory. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities: Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included repair of fence. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included monitoring of dolos on inlet. 12. MISPILION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and emties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen .(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous project: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water; in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Report 1957, (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) . 3-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included breach stabilization, environmental monitoring, disposal area sub-surface exploration and design, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. Maintenance, contract: Work included breach stabilization, environmental monitoring. 13. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, is located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson upstream to Church Street in Haledon. Previous project: None. Existing project: The recommended plan is modified channel with a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel includes both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will be removed. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $ 318,000,000 of which $159,000,000 are federal costs and $ 159,000,000 are required non-federal costs. Cost savings in accordance with Section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662), dated November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the non-federal sponsor, provided their support thru the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 and funds appropriated in their FY 1994 State Capitol Budget. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental testing. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications and environmental testing. 14. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included enviromental monitoring, plans and specifications, and BCR update. 15. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County Delaware to Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England 3-8 --, *PHILADELPHIA. PA DISTRICT Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands,. easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Pt. Pleasant bulkhead coating, and bank stabilization. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from April 5,1993 to August 24, 1993 removing 375,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,064,150. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, repair of bank erosion, maintenance dredging, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 16. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. For further details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915; page 349 of Annual Report for 1924; and page 346 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware River across Salem Cove to the mouth, thence 100 feet wide to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River at Salem, 2 1/4 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff to eliminate a large horseshoe bend between the mouth and Salem. The total length of the section included in the project is about 4 miles. The mean tidal range is 5.4 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The estimate of cost for new work 51,825 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $51,825 contributed by local interests. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The existing project is about 64 percent completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work re- 3-9 REPORT OF TILE SECR[ETARY OF 'IT ... 1..,. ., LktVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 maining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H.Doc. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The existing project required local interest contribute 50 percent of the estimated costs of new work and that a right-of-way for the proposed cutoff shall be conveyed to the United States free of cost. The contributions thus far made provided the right of way for the cutoff and 50 percent of the cost of the 12-foot channel up to a point 225 feet above the county (Penns Neck) highway bridge, amounting to $51,825. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring. There was also maintenance dredging by Cottrell Engineering Corporation from October 1, 1992 to December 17, 1992 removing a total of 22,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $65,000. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, supervision and administration, engineering and design and plans and specifications. 17. SCHIUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 18. TOMS RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Ocean County, New Jersey, flows easterly 19 miles, and empties into Barnegat Bay about 11 miles north of Barnegat Inlet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1216.) Previous project: None. Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide from the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway in Barnegat Bay to the highway bridge over South Fork at Toms River, including a turning basin, and a channel 5 feet deep the full width in the North Fork to the highway bridge. The total length of the section included in the project is about 5 miles. The mean range of tide is about0.5 foot; and extreme tidal range is about 1.8 feet. The estimate cost for new work, revised in 1950, is $295,050. The latest (1950) approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance is $12,500. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: The Act authorizing the 12-foot channel imposed the conditions that local interests agree to provide and maintain an adequate wharf facility, provide suitable annd adequate disposal areas when and as requird for the initial work and subsequent maintenance, and give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of War that the United States will be held and secured free from any claims for damage to natural or 3..10 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRic:T planted beds of oysters in Barnegat Bay that may arise as a result of work under the project. These conditions have not been fulfilled. Terminal facilities: There are numerous light timber piers landings and slips along the shores of the river. The bulkheaded island at the head of navigation serves as a public dock. There are also three boatyards with facilities for overhauling boats up to 50 feet in length. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update. 19. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring, lease of equipment, wetland mitigation, monitoring of artificial reef, boundary monumentation. There was maintenance dredging by Norfolk Dredging Company from March 22, 1993 to April 9, 1993 removing a total of 627,926 cubic yards of material at a cost of $588,279. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, environmental monitoring, surveys on maintenance dredging, wetland mitigation, monitoring of artificial reefs, construction of dikes and sluices, ditching and drainage of disposal area, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Beach Erosion Control: 20. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94- 641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate costs (October 1991) is Federal, $157,000,000, which includes $51,000,000 of Coast Guard contributions non-Federal costs are $12,000,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included periodic nourishment, monitoring, rehabilitation of inlet, plans and specification of beachfill groin. New Work, hired labor: Work included inlet monitoring, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. Flood Control: 21. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1993.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance of stream gauge, water quality testing and monitoring, surveys, concrete testing, computer maintenance, installation of water supply joint use facility, maintenance of dam tower, repair of water control device, replacement of fuel tanks, underwater surveys and bridge inspections. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, periodic inspections, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 22. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control.(For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included well maintenance, visitor center maintenance, water control device, water quality testing 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTliuk and monitoring, replacement of fuel tanks and boat motor, computer maintenance, bridge inspection, surveys by USGS, work on stilling basin, sewage treatment plant, snow survey and NOAA Weather Service Cooperation. Work also included lawn maintenance, janitorial services, trash removal. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of recreation area, instrumentation and surveillance. There was joint use of water facilities, work on stilling basin, boat launch, day use area, installation of siding on storage barn, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Also incurred were costs for maintenance of visitors center. 23. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90,90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $38,100,000 of which $16,700,000 are federal costs and $21,400,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated for the remaining portion of the project. Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unshceduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included operation of sand bypassing plant and monitoring. New work, hired labor: Work included monitoring sand bypassing plant, supervision and administration on tunnel repairs, and engineering and design. 24. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1993 Reconnaissance Reports Wilmington Harbor, DE $ 9,809 Feasibility Reports Gardner's Basin, NJ $161,350 25. FLOOD AND CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1993 Reconnaissance Reports Delaware Canal, Bucks County, PA $14,862 Martins Creek, Tullytown, PA $14,886 Feasibility Reports Darby Creek, Darby Borough,PA $65,149 Little Mill Creek, New Castle City,DE $226,328 Newton Creek, Woodlynne N.J. $ 227,282 Shabakunk Creek, Ewing, NJ $50,834 Construction Palmerton, PA. $92,774 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $540,570 for disaster preparedness. 26. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1993 Feasibility Reports Stoney East Norriton, PA $39,563 Construction Manasquan River, Howell Township, NJ $6,826 27. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose 3-13 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITELs FOR 199, flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total cost is $169,000,000, Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1991) is $28,000,000 including $141,000,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Stream Gage repair, water quality monitoring, maintenance on leak detection device, repair access road, services by NOAA Weather Service. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, repair access road, periodic inspection, installation leak detection device. There was also, rehabilitation of operations building, maintenance on recreational facility, bridge inspection, replacement of generator reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 28. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys, management planning, USGS Stream Gaging, and NOAA Weather Service, repair of water control device. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, installation of stairs, instrumentation and surveillance, repair guard rail, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 29. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The recommended plan consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill will extend from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan will require the initial placement of 4,118,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,072,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment will be taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project will require the extension of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1991) Federal share is $475,000,000 and non-Federal is $255,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Sept. 30, 1993.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in September 1991. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring, supervision and administration, completion of initial beachfill. New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Bethlehem, PA November 1992 May 1993 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $9,125. 31. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: Port Jervis, NY August 1993 Hawley, PA August 1993 32. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village ofAldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,2~$0 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1991) is $3,160,000 including $49,540,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1993.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966 and suspended in 1968 and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, National Weather Service Report Network, repairing of access roads, water quality monitoring, and installation of relief well. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, installation of leak detection device, instrumentation and surveillance, maintenance of relief well, water quality monitoring and testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 33. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition Surveys Date Survey Conducted 3-15 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Salem River, NJ Mispillion River, DE Murderkill River, DE Maurice River, NJ Raccoon Creek, NJ December 1992 March 1993 October 1992 September 1992 August 1993 34. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $68,299. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $1,208,430 for navigation studies: $217,599 for flood control studies, $622,215 for shoreline protection studies, $261,823 for special studies: a total of $2,890,183 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $293,718. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period $794,069 for navigation studies; $236,130 for flood control : a total of $2,174,494. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 SEPT. 30, 1993 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Cedar Creek, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, St. George's Bridge Replacement 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Delaware R{ver, PA, NJ, AND DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) 7. Delaware River Vincinity of Camden (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,052,000 7,018,368 984,798 979,610 4,175,000 4,721,899 4,344,000 3,236,000 2,988,806 6,718,919 - 727,000 - 721,945 1,400,000 1,500,000 516,571 2,985,298 26,000 25,643 -34,853 989,000 988,164 -74,417 -357 - 7,000,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 - 6,999,999 13,979,822 14,010,861 1,028,344 469,800 563,000 249,000 1,024,244 474,236 561,463 247,889 469,630 472,547 612,000 1,567,000 470,428 472,198 611,586 1,563786 11,341,749 14,122,500 11,251,631 14,254,971 15,369,767 17.374,000 15,371,772 17,030,417 31,083,849 31,048,526 15,289,933 15,268,455 13,917,000 13,818,430 256,100 256,100 313,200 310,738 35,100 35,100 35,000,000 34,990,862 879,275 879,275 5,628,651 5,625,996 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,000 10o 150,000 10 72,147,800 3 72,147,800 3 42,710,037 4 42,706,324 4 15,000 15,000 57,879,872 5 57,879,872 5 422,268,568 19 421,895,446 19 508,324 508,324 - -94,000 3,930,000 -350,000 - 988 3,364,363 161,141 5,466,906 1 5,523,359 1 362,962 362,799 3-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 3-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects (Contributed Funds) 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 10. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Manasquan River, NJ 28 (Regular Funds) 12. Mispillion River 28 (Regular Funds) 13. Molly Ann'sBrook, NJ (Regular Funds) 14. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY90 FY91 -- 1,720,000 - 1,145,122 103,245 475,875 79,000 103,045 475,539 78,624 11,003,107 11,049,585 3,343,031 3,364,748 9,671,000 9,641,060 3,933,000 3,918,075 309,880 12,000 303,428 12,860 8,913,000 8,809,414 -278,151 -265,000 FY92 FY93 SEPT. 30,1993 -164,299 1,931 2,555 9,652,000 9,609,681 -20,000 -3,449 86,000 158,000 87,828 153,604 73,000 72,774 - 100,000 176,000 - 97,543 151,782 73,000 72,774 333,000 420,000 340,000 568,000 341,489 415,723 264,137 385,196 21,781 328,756 20,082 329,031 40,000 33,052 34,000 31,120 2,705,000 1,940,078 511,210 18 511,210 18 3,940,974 3,940,253 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 132,535,591 88 132,532,598 8 237,568,365 9 237,348,146 17,356,718 17,360,567 561,514 561,514 2,478,258 2,469,998 60,000 60,000 8,008,278 8,008,278 3,688,700 3,691,381 738,83926 738,839 26 2,220,80727 2,192,906 27 1,912,000 1,711,128 37,630 37,630 2,067,114 2,057,286 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 SEPT. 30,1993 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) 18. Toms River, NJ River, PA (Regular Funds) 19. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehliab. Approp. Cost , New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,060,445 2,438,000 3,196,000 1,662,000 3,062,892 2,425,386 3,185,888 1,683,587 - 274,169 390,000 - 275,000 389,000 80,000 76,781 1,351,520 424,536 965,000 155,000 1,345,895 432,769 961,697 142,299 - 32,000 - 30,304 4,824,340 2,204,920 2,611,000 2,375,000 4,866,118 2,188,084 2,610,850 2,281273 2,213,,000 1,282,829 1,335,300 146,297 2,648,000 4,014,549 839,258 1,965,786 - 3,805,000 136,785 2,276,995 - 250,000 107,986 271,795 562,914 597,000 686,000 661,000 519,341 629,371 676,836 661,568 974 1,315,772 1,355,899 296 1,872,000 1,863,945 1,053 2,093,800 2,050,013 1,786,600 1,742,141 71,549 1 71,54911 39,868,316 12 39,862,330 12 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 107,6342 107,6342 2,847,1736 2,843,9146 51,825 51,825 3,334,007 13 3,334,007 13 30,162,045 30,146,041 10,050 10,050 65,311 65,615 1,954,725 14,7 1,954,725 14,7 74,944,725 74,914,300 60,000 17 60,000 17 13,024,176 11,632,906 * 2,424,758 2,550,857 22,931,831 22,931,831 9,507,089 9,485,410 63,180,300 63,180,299 17,487,194 17,368,389 3-19 TABLE 3-A (Continued) See Section in Text Projects COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY90 FYA.3,9191 FY9 23. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) 28. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) 29. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Prompton Lake (Regular Funds) - 230,000 165,000 158,000 545,089 210,274 96,789 -47,560 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14,008 -47,000 4,625 693,000 682,545 4,339 909 1,448,000 1,450,336 623,000 602,670 129,000 228,000 259,000 160,000 114,381 227,559 235,652 182,404 159,000 750,000 8,317,000 12,967,000 140,600 451,994 6,352,622 14,024,986 - 1,500,000 6,000,000 4,850,000 - - 4,978,243 7,272,965 537,779 703,000 730,000 489,000 541355 712,166 714,452 493.814 4,656,9532200 3,944,338 215,350 215,350 1,268,67121 21 1,259,00221 12,449,682 15 12,352,75315 9,802,949 9,770,243 4,073,105 4,073,105 2,818,064 2,783,712 22,193,000 20,970,202 12,350,000 12,251,208 4,609,483 16 4,609,483 16 6,993,641 66.99882.9.9,82 *Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project underl954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustinent from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continueing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes 63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 7 10Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 21. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 (services) furnished during preconstruction planning. 22. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 24. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 25. 10 & 12 foot anchorages are considered deauthorized. 26. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 27. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 28. 9 foot turning basin is considered inactive. 3-20 30,000 30,000 13,427 570,928 585,470 --.o FY91 FY92 FY9 SP 93 iiix~tJELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Dcuments Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Dec 10, 1979 Oct 27, 1990 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 19352 Aug 26,1937 July 24, 1946 Sept 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CEDAR CREEK, NJ (See section 2 of Text) Creek ranges in depth from 13 feet at the Route 36 bridges to less than 5 feet at several locations. Channel with varies from 75 feet to 250 feet. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 3 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPIHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73d Con.,2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85. 74th Con.,2d sess. H. Doc.358,79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236,99th Cong 2d sess. River and Harbor Act of 1960 WRDA 1990 H. Doc.388,59th Cong 2nd sess. H. Doc.262,77th Cong 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong, 2d sess. 3-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 3-B (continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug 30,1935' June 20, 19384 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 Oct 20, 1988 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 30, 1935 Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ (See Section 7 of Text) A depth of 30 feet from Newton Creek to Kaighn Point, thence 18 feet to Cooper Point. Extending the 30-foot depth upstream to Berkely Street terminal A depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal A depth of 40 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 8 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 9 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess.I Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess.I H. Doc. 580,76th Cong. 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong 1st sess. 1 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Con, 2d sess.t H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1120, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 111, 70th Cong 1st sess. H. Doc. 353, 77th Cong. 1st sess. WRDA 1988 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 330,76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2d sess. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 3-22 ^Aug 7, 1939 PIII )ADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts WorkAuthorized Documents Sept 3, 1954 Aug 30, 1935 July 25, 1912 Aug 30, 1935 IMar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 session. March 2, 1945 March 2, 1912 August 26, 1937 September 3, 1954 November 17, 1986 July 13, 1982 July 1, 1945 Nov 17, 1986 A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. INIAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 10 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties,. 1 MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages.10 the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extention of south. Extention of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 13 of Text) Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material Son each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 15 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H.Doc.275,73d Cong. 2d sess.I. H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2st sess. H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong. 2d sess. Senate Com. Doc., 74th Coi 1st. H.Doc 356, 77th Cong., 1st. session. Cong., 2d sess.1 1 H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong. 2d sess. 1 ' Rivers and Harbor Comm., Doc. 83 S.Doc 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess. 11 WRDA of 1986 H.Ex.Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess.)(See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) H.Doc. 133,76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 3-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIE ARMY ON CIVIL ()OkK.sA i,, ITItES FOR 1993 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 June 3,1896 July 25,1912 Sep 22,1922 July 3,1930 Aug 30, 19358 Oct 17, 1940 July 14, 1960 SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 16 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extention of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHIUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and 1 by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. TOMS RIVER, NJ (See Section 18 of Text) For 5-foot depth in river and forks For 12-foot depth in river and South Fork, including a turning basin, and 5 foot depth in North Fork WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 19 of Text) Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. Documents H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong. 1st Sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15 73d Cong., 1st sess. 1 WRDA of 19861 H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sesst H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d Sesst H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., is' H. Doc. 393, 7th Cong., 1st (Contains latest published maps) H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 3-24 Aefa Wmikml6 I'L;LI :vy ora o~~nr~r 46f t - T.V"' I LI o zaL& ,l PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov 17, 1986 PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 32 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDA of 1986 CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 20 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. 9 FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 27 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 28 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 29 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. H. Doc.90, 90th Cong 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 522,87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 3-25 H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works AdministrationSeptember 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935 3. Also Public Works Administration 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide fromPhiladelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension ofjetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28,1935, under Emergency Relief Administration 9. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 10. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 11. Contains latest published maps. 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1993 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ Absecon Inlet, NJ Alloway Creek, NJ Appoquinimink River,DE Big Timber Creek, NJ Broadkill River, DE Cohansey River, NJ Cooper River, NJ1 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ Double Creek, NJ' Harbor of Refuge Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay Little River, DE Mantua Creek, NJ Maurice River, NJ Delaware Bay to Millville Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project ** Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA Oldmans Creek, NJ *Pepper Creek, DE Raccoon Creek, NJ St. Jones River, DE Delaware Bay to Lebanon 1 '1 Jetties and entrance at mouth Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA Smyrna River, DE Delaware River t ?Wharf at Smyrna Landing Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Tuckerton Creek, NJ Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ 1 COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED 3-27 1989 1990 1989 1934 1989 1976 1986 1989 1912 1912 1981 1980 1966 1948 1968 1941 1989 1981 1961 1955 1949 19-86 1991 1940 11,935 534,2096 21,398 36,973 58,6652 68,228 146,75613 33,102 256,624 7,800 5,162,230 18 168,41211 12,016 169,687 143,98413 128,20314 31,188 138,09415 83,665 13 207,102 4,291,810 198,844 60,242 27,09310 84,186 5,98517317 55,117 41,270 71,925 243,641 2,263,214 396,528* 5 1,169,01419 98,36012 288,310 339,340 161,913 54,601 32,125 38,988 341,734 66,093 4 197,327 638,860 328,634 56,474 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIEE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1993 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek 1 INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA1 6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE 16 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ 1 3 INACTIVE -7 15,048 - Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1993 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 09 Delaware Bay to Lebanon ' - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 DEFERRED Toms River, NJ SEE TABLE 3-F - Channel 12 feet deep DEFERRED - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 13. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 16. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-28 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-D BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1993 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ INACTIVE* 1978 314,400 Long Beach Island INACTIVE - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - 1. Operation and maintenance required under Public Works Extension of five existing groins completed Acceleraion Program for by law to be assumed by local interests, groins completed 11 May 1964. NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1993 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 - Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 - Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 - Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 - Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,4674 - 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. New project deferred. 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. 4. Transfer from Baltimore District in Fiscal Year 1989. 3-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1993 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE1 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $78,243 - Atlantic City, NJ 1972 HD 538 918 $2,083,289 - Barnegat Light, NJ 1964 HD 208 918 $ 70,908 - CapeMay City, NJ 1961 3 Sep 54 HD 206 918 $ 22,9578 - Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $ 7,139 - Long Beach Island, NJ 1964 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 $40,665 - Ocean City, NJ 1969 HD 184 918 $395,83110 - Rehoboth Beach to Indian River 1965 HD 216 Inlet, DE 918 $326,116 - For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Beach Erosion Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Hereford Inlet 1978 Section 12 PL 93-251 314,400 - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 Millville fixe bridge to upper end of project Oldmans Creek, NJ 3 1941 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313 - Rancocas River, NJ4 1942 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590 - Smyrna River, DE5 1949 2 Nov 79 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed HD 95-157 $396,169 - bridge. For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA7 1917 1966 Chester River, 5 Aug 77 HD 94-192 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 17 Nov 86 $4,520,995 3-30 TABLE 3-F(cont) PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Tocks Island, PA,NJ,and NY9 1979 23 Oct 6210 PL 87-874 $65,106,2601 - Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. 1979 23 Oct 62 Route 209 only) PA PL 87-874 $195,223 Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 - ........ .. .-... %W.-..... 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 7. Excludes $58,585 accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Work funds expended for extension. 8. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Work funds expended for extention. 9. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 10. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under extention of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. 3-31 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Annapolis Harbor, MD .......................................... 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA.......................................4-3 3. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift........................4-4 4. Bonum Creek, VA ............................................... 4-4 5. Cambridge Harbor, MD.........................................4-5 6. Chester River, M D ............................................... 4-5 7. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD.................4-6 8. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ............................. 4-6 9. Knapps N arrow s, M D ........................................... 4-6 10. Little Wicomico River, VA.....................................4-6 11. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA.... .................. 4-7 12. Nanticoke River, MD .... ........................ 4-7 13. N ortheast River, M D ............................................ 4-7 14. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD..........................................4-7 15. Pocom oke River, M D ............................................ 4-8 16. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ......................................... 4-8 17. Potomac River-Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC...............................4-8 18. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA.........................4-9 19. Potomac River at Mount Vernon, VA ................... 4-9 20. Potomac River Below Washington, DC ................ 4-9 21. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, MD .............................. 4-9 22. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD.............................4-10 23. Slaughter Creek, MD...........................................4-10 24. Washington Harbor, DC......................................4-10 25. W icomico River, M D ....................................... .... 4-11 26. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. 4-11 27. Navigation work under Special A uthorization ................................................. 4-11 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 35A. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 43A. 43B. 43C. 43D. 43E. 43F. 43G. Beach Erosion Control Page Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ........................... 4-11 Atlantic Coast of Maryland ................................. 4-11 Colonial Beach, VA ............................................ 4-12 Flood Control Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC & MD ............................... 4-12 Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville R oad, M D ....................................................... 4-12 Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ................. 4-13 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV .............. 4-13 Lackawanna River Basin, PA ................. 4-13 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA................................4-13 Lock H aven, PA ................................................ 4-14 McCready's Point Road, MD ............................... 4-14 Middle Hooper Island, MD..................................4-14 Petersburg, M D ................................................... 4-14 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ............................................ 4-15 Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA ........................................ 4-15 Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD...............4-15 Southern New York Flood Control Projects .............................................. 4-15 A ddison, N Y ...................................................... 4-16 Alm ond Lake, NY ............................................... 4-16 Arkport Dam , NY ............................................... 4-16 A voca, N Y .......................................................... 4-16 Bingham ton, NY ................................................ 4-16 Canisteo, N Y ..................................................... 4-17 C orning, N Y ............................ .......................... 4-17 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 43H. East Sidney Lake, NY ... ...................... 4-17 43I. Elmira, NY ...................... ...................... 4-18 43J. Hornell, NY ............................................... 4-18 43K . Lisle, N Y ............................................................ 4-18 43L. Oxford, NY .............................. 4-19 43M. Whitney Point Lake, NY ..................................... 4-19 43N. Whitney Point Village, NY..................................4-19 44. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA.....................................4-19 45. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna R iver, PA ........................................................ 4-20 46. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ........................................ 4-20 46A. Cowanesque Lake, PA.........................................4-20 46B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ................................ 4-21 47. West Branch of Susquehanna R iver, PA ....................................................... 4-21 47A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA.......................................4-21 47B. Curwensville Lake, PA........................................4-21 47C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA...........................4-21 48. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA................................4-22 49. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................... 4-22 50. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir O perations ...................................................... 4-22 51. Flood Control Work under special authorization .................................................. 4-22 52. 53. 54. 55. Water Supply Page Washington Aqueduct ......................................... 4-22 General Investigations S urvey s................................................................ 4-23 Collection and Study of Basic Data....................4-23 Pre-construction Engineering and D esign .......................................... ................. 4-23 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement .................. 4-25 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation.............................4-32 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................... 4-39 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................................... 4-40 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. ......................... 4-41 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ............................... 4-42 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................................. 4-44 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects................................4-44 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Navigation 1. ANNAPOLIS HARBOR, MD Location. Annapolis Harbor includes certain portions of the Severn River and College and Spa Creeks bordering the city of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12283, 12270, and 12282.) Previous project. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of June 14, 1880. For further details see page 353, Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. This provides for a channel 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Severn River to a point in Spa Creek opposite the city slip and an anchorage basin of 12 feet depth just below the county highway bridge over the creek. The mean range of tide is about 0.9 foot. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. The water front from the mouth of Spa Creek to the highway bridge is developed to a large extent for commercial purposes. On the north bank of the stream, just above the Naval Academy wall, there is a ferry dock and a lumber wharf, both of pile-and-timber construction. Above the steamboat dock is the city slip. In addition to an open frontage owned by the city of Annapolis, this slip is occupied by two oil companies, a sea-food packing house, a sand-and-gravel yard, an ice plant, and a hardware and marine supply company. Between the city slip and the bridge a concrete bulkhead and a yacht basin have been built. On the southern bank of Spa Creek there are four marine repair plants, two of which are below the bridge. One plant has four marine railways, with capacities ranging from 50 to 275 tons. Each of the other three plants has one railway of about 20-ton capacity. Most of the wharves are privately owned and not open to the public. The old steamboat wharf and the city slip are used by the public to some extent. Boats are not generally permitted to land along the Naval Academy wall. The exiting facilities are considered adequate for present needs. Operations and results during fiscal year. The modification to the Annapolis Harbor which was desired by local interests to improve safety and mooring efficiency, was approved by the Corps of Engineers. The U.S. Coast Guard and the Department of Transportation are now required to develop new regulations for the channel and anchorage and move the existing channel markers. The Corps furnished the necessary coordinates to the U.S. Coast Guard for their use. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non- Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: None. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Craighill Entrance, Cutoff Angle, Swan Point Channel and intersection of the Tolchester Channel and Southern Approach Channel to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal commenced on November 4, 1992, and was completed on March 18, 1993. Approximately 1,434,000 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Pooles Island G-South open water placement area in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $3,426,000. A contract in the amount of $9,777,000 was awarded on September 17, 1993, to dredge an estimated $2.1 million cubic yards of material from the Craighill Channel, Craighill Angle, Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, and Tolchester Channel and deposit the material in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the Cape Henry, York Spit, and Rappahannock Shoal Channels were made. Plans and specifications were prepared and a contract was advertised on September 13, 1993, for maintenance dredging of the Cape Henry Channel. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 14,580 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 4. BONUM CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary of the Potomac River, enters its right bank 18 miles upstream from Chesapeake Bay. It is in Westmoreland County, VA, about 90 miles southeasterly of Washington, DC. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12286.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to and including an anchorage basin at the same depth 160 feet wide and 200 feet long in front of the proposed public landing to be provided by local interests. Project also provides fbr the entrance channel to be protected on both sides by jetties, the north jetty being about 700 feet long and the south jetty being about 300 feet long. Cost of new work for completed project was $205,998 for construction, of which $202,000 was for the Federal cost, exclusive of aids to navigation and preauthorization and $3,998 was the non-Federal contribution. Local cooperation. Local interest must furnish lands, and rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto; make alterations, relocations, and removals as required of utility facilities, and wrecks and stakes; establish a competent public body to regulate the harbor facilities; and make a lump sum cash contribution of 2 percent of the first cost of general navigation facilities. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on January 11, 1967. 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned piers or wharves are available on Bonum Creek. Local interests constructed an oyster packing house and a public landing. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project channel, by contract, began October 3, 1992, to remove 25,000 cubic yards of dredged material, and is scheduled to be completed in October 1993. The dredged material is being placed in open water, covered with oyster shell in anticipating an oyster set. This beneficial use of dredged material to create an oyster bar may be used as a long-term effort. Periodic investigation will help determine the success of this effort. 5. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Location. This harbor is a tidal estuary on the south side of Choptank River about 18 miles above its mouth. It is approximately 70 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12266.) Previous project. For details see page 1789 of Annual Report for 1915, page 424 of Annual Report for 1924, and page 373 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in the Choptank River for an approximate distance of 2,000 feet; then widen into a triangular shaped turning basin 25 feet deep, 1,400 feet long and 750 feet wide; then continue with a channel 150 feet wide and 14 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 14 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel; another basin of the same depth, 225 feet long, and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel below the bridge; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Choptank River to the municipal boat basin north of the harbor entrance. The modification authorized by the 1948 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included a channel 150 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth and irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. The waterfront of Cambridge is generally built of solid bulkhead wharves and pile and timber piers, only a few of which have mechanical freighthandling facilities. With the exception of a State owned terminal which is open to the public, the wharves are privately owned. There are town marine railways with boatrepair shops, five oil and gasoline terminals, two large fertilizer companies and one large packing house located on the shore of Cambridge Creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Studying various modifications to the existing Federal navigation channel and anchorages within Cambridge Creek under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local interests desire that the channel width be reduced along certain reaches in order to enhance waterfront development projects. Study was submitted to higher authority for approval. 6. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 miles south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12266 and 12270.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of the project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed in July 1993 to remove 62,000 cubic yards of dredged material. The material was placed behind segmented offshore breakwaters and planted with marsh grass at Eastern Neck Wildlife Refuge which is owned by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Two geotextile tubes were also installed to help dissipate wave energy. 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 7. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location.Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 8. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Islands and the mainlands; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Islands. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Islands; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished spoil placement areas for maintenance dredging in fiscal year 1990. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, 4 oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 9. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 20, 1991 to remove 72,000 cubic yards of material. Contract funds were deobligated since dredging was completed in fiscal year 1992. 10. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12233.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 11. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Location. Monroe Bay is an indentation on the right bank of Potomac River in Westmoreland County, VA, 34 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 75 miles downstream from Washington, DC. Monroe Creek is a tidal stream 5 miles long which flows southerly and discharges into Monroe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end in vicinity of Colonial Beach waterworks. The mean range of tide is 1.56 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,460. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous wharves and landings in the creek, of which 3 are open to the public. There are two marine railways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 12. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD Location. The Nanticoke River flows in a southwesterly direction to Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay, and is about 50 miles long. The town of Nanticoke, Md., is on the east side of the river, about 3 miles from the mouth, just north of Roaring Point. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 567.) Existing project. Provides for a small-boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at Nanticoke, with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide, protected by twin stone jetties in the river, the north jetty being about 870 feet long and the south jetty being about 770 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 2.6 feet. The cost of new work for the completed project was $73,243. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish placement sites as required for subsequent maintenance and guarantee the United States and its contractors against claims for damages to oyster beds attributable to subsequent maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned wharves open to the general public. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, to restore channel and basin to authorized dimensions began in April 1992 and was completed in September 1992. A total of 49,867 cubic yards of material, place measure, was removed and deposited in an upland placement site. Contractor pursuing claim against the Government for Differing Site Condition. 13. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 14. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16 and 14 foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1.993 The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests, must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed; Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. A beneficial use placement site is being pursued for this project. 15. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, VA. Existing project. Provides for a channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from the 11-foot depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and for construction of a dike along the offshore side of channel between Tulls Point and the end of the existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to the bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point, and about 4.5 miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, MD. Shad Landing is about 25.7 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 2.5 feet in the river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. Estimated cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension of channel above the bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from Shad Landing to the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by acts of June 3, 1986, and August 30, 1935, except local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future maintenance. Terms for the section of the project above the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages resulting from the improvement; and contribute one-half the initial cost of that portion of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion was deauthorized. Terms for the 11-foot depth channel from Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, authorized by act of September 3, 1954, and deauthorized in December 1989 required local interests to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of the project; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance, including such damages as may occur to the public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical freight-handling facilities. Any appreciable increase in commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate construction of new facilities and repair of existing structures. Adequate space is available for development of additional terminals. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 16. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 19 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 279,720 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 17. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC extending southward to the 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT U.S. Route 301 Bridge (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA which must be reexecuted annually expired on September 30, 1991 included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harvesting operations resulted in about 16 acres of nuisance aquatic plants at sites in Virginia. Due to budget constraints, Maryland did not participate in the program this year. There were no harvesting operations conducted in the District of Columbia or Maryland this fiscal year. 18. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, D.C., on right bank of Potomac River, which flows southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: Mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is in project document. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 12 regular shipping wharves or landings; nine of these are privately owned (of which four are open to the public by special arrangement) and three owned by the United States. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 19. POTOMAC RIVER AT MOUNT VERNON, VA Location. Mount Vernon lies in Fairfax County, VA, about 14'/2 miles below Washington, DC on the right bank of the Potomac River, which flows in a southeasterly direction into the Chesapeake Bay, 931/2 miles downstream from Mount Vernon. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 560.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 200 feet wide and 9 to 10 feet deep, at mean low water, between the main channel of the Potomac River and the Mount Vernon wharf, a distance of about 2,200 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and a radius of 200 feet at the wharf. Tidal ranges are: mean. 2.2 feet; irregular, 3 feet; and extreme, 9.7 feet. The cost estimate of the project to the Federal Government made in 1888 was $26,000. There is no approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned and operated wharf on the Mount Vernon estate at the head of the channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 20. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12233, 12286, 12287, 12288, and 12289.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. In all, 11 wharves are thus served. These wharves are of open and solid fill construction and bulkhead type. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 21. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There was one detailed investigation of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. 22. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD Location. Rhodes Point and Tylerton are two settlements about 1.5 miles apart on Smith Island, between Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound, about 60 miles north of Virginia Capes and about 110 miles south of Baltimore. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide from that depth in tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet. On January 22, 1982, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide a distance of about one mile from the anchorage basin at Rhodes Point through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1982. See section 19 of 1982 Annual report for requirement details. Terminal facilities. There are numerous pile-and-timber wharves along waterfronts at Rhodes Point and Tylerton. Facilities are privately owned, but open to the public without charge when not in use by the owners, and are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient space for construction of additional facilities is available, if required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in conection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 23. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Location. This is a waterway about 8 miles long and tidal throughout connecting with Little Choptank River 5 miles from its mouth. It lies in Dorchester County, MD, between Taylors Island and the mainland of the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. The mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and the extreme tidal range is 2.9 feet. The cost for new work, made in 1911, is $4,140. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one solid bulkhead wharf about 300 feet long, served by this improvement. It is privately owned but open to general public use, and is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 24. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 25. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing pI)roject. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-andtimber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the Tshaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project channel was awarded in September 1993. Dredged material is being placed into three previously used diked upland sites. 26. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SERVICES (See Table 4-I at end of chapter.) 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $67,787 for Crisfield Harbor, MD; $276,500 for Lower Thorofare, MD; $6,635 for Monroe Bay, VA; $1,700 for Neabasco Creek, VA; $11,966 for Ocean City Harbor and Inlet, MD; $729 for Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD; $922 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD; $27,457 for Tedious Creek, MD; and $35,479 Thorofare Channel, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $5,942 for Solomons Island Harbor, MD; and $24,075 for Tedious Creek, MD. Beach Erosion Control 28. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $668 for Town of North Beach, MD. Non-Federal contribution costs for the fiscal year were $37,892 for Town of North Beach, MD. 29. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, Maryland which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 miles across the Delaware line. The bulkhead is fronted by a 165-foot wide beach and the dune is fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. The project also provides for periodic nourishment over the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $540,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $46,000,000 for initial construction and $494,000,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully complied with these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Following a severe northeast storm in December 1992, a construction contract was awarded January 20, 1993 to restore the dune and a 10-foot-wide portion of the berm. The contract was completed March 9, 1993. 30. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, VA, is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12286.) Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineering under authority of Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: The project provides for extending the existing Central Beach area and beach at Castlewood Park; off shore breakwaters; and one terminal groin at Castlewood Park. The Central Beach extension begins downstream from Hawthorne Street and continues southward for 1,570 feet, a maximum width of 120 feet and provides 107,200 square feet of area, stabilized with vegetation about 200 feet of embankment behind the beachfill. There are four 200-foot breakwaters to stabilize this beach area. At Castlewood Park there are: a 59,300 square feet beach area; three breakwaters and one 100- foot terminal groin to reduce shoaling to the entrance channel to Monroe Creek. The breakwaters are two each at 200 feet in length and one at 300 feet. The beach will have periodic nourishment when needed. Local cooperation. The May 4, 1981 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and the Town of Colonial Beach, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save U.S. from damages; assure public ownership; assure maintenance and repair of the breakwaters; provide 50 percent of the initial construction cost; provide 50 percent of the cost of periodic beach nourishment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Nourishment of the existing project at Castlewood Park is currently under construction. Flood Control 31. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, DC and MD Location. Project is on Anacostia River at confluence of northeast and northwest branches of Bladensburg, Md., about 9 miles above mouth at Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Channel improvements of Anacostia River from foot of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia, to junction of Northeast and Northwest Branches at Bladensburg, Md.; channel improvement in Northeast Branch from mouth upstream to near Longfellow Street in Riverdale, Md.; channel improvement in Northwest Branch from mouth upstream to near 38th Street in Brentwood, Md.; levees along both banks of the streams to protect Bladensburg, Edmonston, Riverdale, Cottage City, and Colmar Manor, Md.; interior drainage facilities in these communities, including four pumping stations and necessary intercepting sewers and alterations and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Portion of channel improvement of Anacostia River from vicinity of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia to near Defense Highway Bridge on U.S. Route 50, provides for navigation channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide with a commercial boat basin, and a recreational boat basin having a capacity of 150 boats, both on east bank of river near Bladensburg, Md. Federal cost for new work for completed project was $6,042,325. Estimated cost to local interests for construction, lands, and damages is $6,275,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Beneficial use of dredged material to restore Kenilworth Marsh. Contract awarded on September 30, 1992 to remove 140,000 cubic yards of material from Benning Road Bridge in the District of Columbia to Bladensburg, Maryland. Maintenance dredging was completed January 25, 1993. 32. CHESAPEAKE BAY AT HOOPERSVILLE ROAD, MD Location. The project is located on Middle Hooper Island in southern Dorchester County, approximately 35 miles south of the City of Cambridge, MD. Existing project. The project includes construction of a stone revetment along a 390-foot section of the endangered roadway. The structure is designed as a free-standing revetment with a trapezoidal cross section. The structure consists of a bedding layer and armor stone layer, placed over geotextile fabric which will reduce settlement of the structure into the soft clay bottom. The Corps revetment ties into existing shoreline protection structures previously constructed to the north and south of the project by the County and the State. Local cooperation. The project is supported by Dorchester County, MD, the local sponsor for the project. Funding assistance is being provided to the County by the State of Maryland, Department of Natural Resources. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on January 5, 1993. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project was completed September 1993. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 33. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees alongthe right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Local interests operate a white water access area below the dam. The State of Maryland is building a recreation area on the Maryland side of the lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 35A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $86,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municipal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction continued on the Bald Eagle Creek levee and West Branch Susquehanna River levee (below Jay Street) contracts. The third major construction contract (remaining Susquehanna River levees) was awarded on November 19, 1992. The overall project which is about 80% complete is scheduled for completion in July 1994. 37. McCREADY'S POINT ROAD, MD Location. The project is located on the northeastern shoreline of Fishing Bay, one-half mile southeast of Fishing Point in southern Dorchester County. McCready's Point is about 35 miles south of the City of Cambridge, MD. Existing project. The project includes construction of two segmented offshore breakwaters, each 130 feet in length, separated by a gap width of 70 feet. The segments are constructed using armor units placed over a bedding layer, and geotextile fabric. The segments are located 75 feet offshore with a crest height of +3 Ft MLW. The side slopes are located on 1.5 horizontal. The project also includes a 20-foot wide sand fill area along the shoreline, which is stabilized with vegetation. Local cooperation. The project is supported by Dorchester County, MD, the local sponsor for the project. Funding assistance is being provided to the County by the State of Maryland, Department of Natural Resources. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed October 2, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project was completed May 31, 1993. The sponsor will be responsible for maintaining the integrity of the structure and renourishment/re-planting of the sand fill, as necessary. 38. MIDDLE HOOPER ISLAND, MD Location. The project is located on the northwest corner of Middle Hooper Island, about 35 miles south of Cambridge, MD, in southern Dorchester County. Existing project. The project includes the construction of five segmented offshore breakwaters, 150 feet in length, separated by gap widths of 100 feet. The segments are constructed using armor stone placed over a bedding stone layer, sand and geotextile fabric. The segments are located 125 feet offshore, with a crest height of +4 Ft MLW. The side slopes are 1 vertical on 1.5 horizontal. Local cooperation. The project is supported by Dorchester County, MD, the local sponsor for the project. Funding assistance is being provided to the County by the State of Maryland, Department of Natural Resources. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed October 2, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project was initiated in May 1993 and is continuing due to delays by the contractor. Construction is anticipated to be completed in December 1993. 39. PETERSBURG, WV Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River in eastern Grant County, West Virginia. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig, WV.). Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and flood warning system improvements. The current estimated total project cost is $23,700,000 which includes a future inflation through project completion. Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction began with the initiation of real estate acquisition activities and continuation of engineering and design. The overall project which is about 18% complete is scheduled for completion in January 1997. 40. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. The Raystown Lake Master Plan is in the process of being updated. Funding of $600,000 was provided by Congressional Add. Completion of the update is scheduled for FY 94. 41. SOLOMON CREEK, ASHLEY BOROUGH, LUZERNE COUNTY, PA Location. Solomon Creek is located in central Luzerne County in northeastern Pennsylvania, approximately .5 mile south of Wilkes Barre. Existing project. On September 25, 1990, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works authorized the Chief of Engineers, under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended, to construct an emergency streambank protection project at Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Pennsylvania. The project consists of constructing 30 feet of gabion retaining wall along an eroding streambank. Without construction of the Federal project, Solomon Creek would continue to erode the streambank resulting in the eventual collapse of the roadway above. The gabion wall will tie into the existing concrete wall at the downstream end of the project and an existing stone masonry wall at the upstream end. The structure is approximately 11 feet high. A small section of the streambank upstream of the project area will also be protected with additional gabions. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the Borough of Ashley was executed on October 4, 1990. The local sponsor is responsible for providing all lands, easements, and rights of way as well as 25 percent of the total construction costs. Following more than two years of coordination, the easements were obtained by the local sponsor and advertisement for construction of the project was initiated in late fiscal year 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project was completed April 8, 1993. 42. SOLOMONS ISLAND, CALVERT COUNTY, MD Location. Solomons Island is located in Calvert County, Maryland, approximately 40 miles southeast of Washington, DC and 55 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland. Existing project. On February 4, 1992, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works authorized the Chief of Engineers, under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended, to construct an emergency shoreline erosion control project at Solomons Island, Calvert County, Maryland. The project consists of 500 linear feet of stone revetment placed against a deteriorating steel sheetpile bulkhead. The project is designed to protect the roadway adjacent to the shoreline. Without construction of the Federal project, continued wave attack will result in structural failure of the steel sheetpile bulkhead and collapse of the roadway. The revetment consists of a bedding stone layer placed over a geotextile fabric. Armor stone weighing between 200-800 lbs will be placed over the bedding layer at a varying slope. The revetment ties into the existing bank on the seaward side of the roadway at an average elevation of 7.5 feet above mean low water (MLW). Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration, was executed on April 14, 1992. The local sponsor is responsible for providing all lands, easements, and rights of way, as well as 25 percent of the total construction costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project was completed in October 1992. 43. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are lo- 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 cated in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 43A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10- foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 43C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping-areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A Phase I contract for removal of sediment from selected locations along the project was completed in October 1990. Phase II contract for repair and replacement of floodwalls, replacement of check dams and other miscellaneous repairs to slopes and channels was completed in October 1991. Phase III contract for repair at floodwalls was awarded in fiscal year 1992 and has been completed. 43K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 43M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5- foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. During a high water event in March-April 1993, a significant seepage condition occurred at a location of the project where it was previously observed. A plan of action has been formulated to alleviate the seepage with construction scheduled to take place during FY 94-FY 95. 43N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 44. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Location. The project is located in the Township of Pittston along the banks of Spring Brook Creek adjacent to PA state route 502. Pittston Township is located in northeastern Luzerne County, PA approximately 1 mile southeast of Scranton, PA. (See USGS quad sheets "Pittston, PA" and "Avoca, PA".) Existing project. On January 26, 1989, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized construction of streambank protection. The work consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. Additional riprap is being placed as a betterment that was proposed by the sponsor. The estimated project implementation cost is $460,000, of which the sponsor has contributed $115,000 as well as provided $40,000 for the betterment. Local cooperation. The July 24, 1989 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Pittston Township, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from dam- 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 ages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on September 30, 1989 and was physically completed in June 1990. A construction contract claim was settled during the fiscal year and the project is expected to be fiscally closed out early in fiscal year 1993. 45. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 46. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 46A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,000 of which $1,257,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non-Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work was completed on modifications to the intake tower which completes project construction. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 46B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 47. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek) and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard) on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 47A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. An outlet works stairway was installed. This provides for a safer access to the tunnel for maintenance and inspection purposes. 47B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Clearfield County provides recreation including boating, fishing, picnicking, and swimming. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 47C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 48. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Pennsylvania-York and Hanover.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Phase II contract for rehabilitation of the Codorus Creek was awarded in September 1992. Contract work consists of construction of stop log closure, riprap repair, and drainage structure repairs. This contract work has been completed. 49. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See table 4-1. 50. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $59,257. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $35,567. 51. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $167,514 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $212,175 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; and $26,926 for Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA. There were no non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $7,264 for Rooster Island, MD; and $12,603 for Spring Brook Creek, PA. Water Supply 52. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1993 was 65,059 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 244 million gallons and average daily consumption was 179 million gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 39.9 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $6,738,806 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.0 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.I. 93-523). General Investigations 53. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $2,236,027 of which $468,807 was for navigation studies, $1,106,800 for flood damage prevention studies, $2,126 for shoreline protection studies, $214,671 for special studies, $46,599 for review of completed projects, $229,851 for special investigations, $29,539 for interagency water resource development, $2,861 for North American waterfowl management plan, $7,733 for National Marine Fisheries Service, and $127,040 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $666,467 of which $117,876 was for navigation studies, $430,362 for flood damage, $38,395 for review of completed projects, and $79,834 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. 54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $191,362. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 55. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Curwensville Lake, PA-Reallocation-The recommended project includes modification of project features to allow reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. Contract negotiations for a water supply contract continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering costs is $523,000, which will be repaid by the sponsor during the first year of construction. Total costs during the fiscal year were $67,534. Lackawanna River at Olyphant, PA-The recommended project includes about 5,200 feet of levees and walls, one closure structure and other minor features to protect against a 100-year design flood. Surveying and mapping and preparation of a detailed project management plan was initiated and essentially completed, and engineering analyses and cultural studies continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $800,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $372,880. Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA-The recommended project includes about 7,400 feet of levees and walls, four closure structures and other minor features to protect against a 100-year design flood. Surveying and mapping and preparation of a detailed project management plan was initiated and essentially completed, engineering analyses and cultural continued, and design of the flood warning system was initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $1,200,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $506,750. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The authorized project provides for raising the existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising one other local protection project, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of the existing project. Preparation of a draft Phase II General Design Memorandum was completed during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $11,400,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $2,102,514. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $31,524. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,600,000. Moorefield, WV-The authorized project includes 21,735 feet of earth levee, 1,290 feet of floodwall, replacement of 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 the South Branch Valley Railrofad bridge, and appurtenant project featuLres, such as ramps, closures, riprap, and relocations. Preparation of a project design memorandum was completed during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,437,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $811,300. 4-24 BAL'TIMORE, MD I)ISTRICT TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 1. Annapolis IItarl)or, MI) 2. Baltinmore Harbor & Channels, M1) & VA 3. laltimore I larbor MI) C(ollectionll & Removal of I)rift 4. BonnIunL Creek. VA 5. Cambridge Harbor, M1l) 6. Chester River, MD) 7. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MI) 8. Honga River & Tar Bay 9. Knapps Narrows, MI) 10. Little Wicomico River, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Approp. (Cost Mainlt. A\pp)rop.). Cost New Work Appro1p. Cost Maiit. Approp. ('ost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Mlaint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Iaint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20,00()()() 19,995 9,0(00( 7,991 18,096,00() - 17,818,943 211,51( (50,818) 4,455,0()6:1 : 13,330,:005 15,983,4627 4,31 16,755 13,277,5893 15,993,600 12,714,5)00 12.690,072 33:1:17,789 33:7,776 6,00()0 3,158 (3:18,93:3) 379,000 :77,288 30),000 29,997 (94,3001 270,795 329,0() 330,551 108,0()0 98,003 1,552 34,2501 34,2501 51,366 51,366 5,000 6,014 1,950,000() 144,180,7122 1,077,138 143,119,1922 5,739,000' 125,167,66911 5,992,48910 125,240,18811 1,338 65,660,938 1,339 64,783,067 348,000 347,778 174,000 184,000 14,976 16,266 7,296 20,(00 19,623 85,00()() 85,353 60,000 48,284 957,600 966.339 58,500 58,500 1,041.509 1,041,241 5,000 4,282 207,970 206,874 44,600 77,600 201,000 195,687 458,200 464,230 83,000 83,398 (24,000) (23,999) 40,300 40,300 5,409,999 5,409,601 202,00012 202,00012 456,576 456,576 195,97413 195,97413 946,934 946,934 70,49514 77,79114 2,761,524 2,758,523 50,591 50,591 862,148 862,148 66,11915 66,11915 4,193,035 4,225,767 46,12116 46,12116 2,527,775 2,527,775 81,88517 81,88517 1,788,477 1,787,779 4-25 REPORT OF 'I'HE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 11. Molonroe Hay & New Work Creek 12. N;anticoke River, MD 18. Northeast Riv er. 14. Ocean City Htarbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, IDl) 15. Pocomoke River. ID[) 16. Potomac and Anacostia Hivers, DC, Collection & Removal of I)rift 17. Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MI) VA, DC 18. Potomac River at Alexandria. VA 19. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, MD 20. Potomac River below Washington, DC Approp. (Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New \VWork Approp. (Cost MIaint. Ap prop. (Cost New Work Approp. (Cost .11aint. ,Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost l a jor Real )b. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost NIaint. Approp. ("Cost 11aint. Approp. (Cost New Work Approp. Cost Cont ributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,635 54,()000 54,()00() 12,460 19,095 441,685 441,685 73,243 73,243 519,000 5 17,723 382,772 :79,281 22,003 169.900 1(9,302 8,600 (12:1) 58,300 28,300 11,966 6,000() 43,907 577,441 567,441 28,48918 28,48918 963,344 933,344 350,19319 362,15919 71,700 10,448,080 76,879 10,447,080 4,335,900 4,335,900 191,72620 191,72620 4139.938 438,857 565,500 565,420 94.000 (24,925) 548,100 546,898 596,000 597,207 130,000 116,.331 98.000 -473 07 59,500 2,105,973 59,50()0 2,104,892 786,000 10,288,775 781,115 10,283,634 158,000 2,281,065 52,442 2,010,229 33,500 13.188 40,000 37,146 69,320 68,562 47,400 47,994 57,000 54,432 75,000 77,747 291,866 291,865 95.214 95.214 573.158 569.080 17,00021 17,00021 343,465 340,611 153,836 153,836 2,281,294 2,281,29' 4-26 IIAL'IIMOILE, MD) DISTI1CT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text P'roject Funding FY90( FY91 FY92 'Y93 Sept. 30, 1993 21. I'revention of (O)bstructions &s Injurious )eposits, lIalItimore HI ar)bor. 22. Rhodes Point to Tviertn,.11M 1) 23. Slaughter (Creek. il) 24. Washingt(on lHarbor, D( 25. \Wiconlico River, .I I) 29. Atlanti c (C ost 10. (Colonial Beach. II) 31. Anacostia River & Tributaries. Flood P'rotection & Navigation improvements. DC & MD) 32. Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville 33. Cumberland, MI) and Ridgeley, WVw Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Ma int. , A pportop. Cost New Work Ap)prop. Cost 1aint. Apporop. Cost New Work App)rop.). Cost M\ailit. Approp. Cost New \Work Appro)p. Cost Mcaint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost (Contributed Approp.. (Cost New W\ork Approp. Cost ( ont ributed Apporop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Miaint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5.1:3,00)5 54:13,005 1:1.887 1:1,529 51;,252 55,621 8.t085,00 5.49),279 6,417,600 2.866.545 68,184 68.184 375,000 :174,8: ) _-- 49,00()0 46,.700 79,)000() 76,295 8.991 .000 9,499,109 2.215,100 4,846.249 16,260() 12,117 56.000) 54,164 75,000) 72,264- 365,00()0 3165,170 68,600 71,262 153.000 156,382 3,,4)0,000 5,213,051 :3,1 27,797 3,214.978 1.409 140,000 129.242 82.000 84,735 51 ),0()) 7,150,045 509,96(0 7,150,005 -- 304,000 -- 304,000 62,100 1,044,894 62,100 1,044,893 -- 4,140 -- 4,140 43,000 634,570 43,000 634,570 - 3,191,07722 - 3,191,07722 25,000 5,050,78323,24 24,328 5,050,11123,24 - 471,60925 - 471,60925 609,000 8,960,999 569,013 8,921,001 1,325,000 21,801,000 1,288,040 21,490,779 786,808 12,547,305 832,338 11,760,110 142,000 677,260 106,963 638,519 - 414,977 - 414,977 - 6,042,325 - 6.042,325 2,046,324 3,691,97926 2,085,918 3,718,97926 135,700 135,700 153,748 153,748 69,495 69,495 66.890 66,890 - 15.633,970 - 15.633,970 64,000 1,135,413 64,001 1,135,413 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY90 I91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 34. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD & WV 35A. Aylesworth Lake (Creek, PA 36. Lock Havent. PA 37. McCready's Point Road, M ) 38. Middle Hooper Island, MD 39. Petersburg, WV 40. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch. Juniata River, PA 41. Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne Co. PA 42. Solomnons Island, Calvert Co, MD 43A. Addison, NY New Work Approp. ('ost MIaint. Approp. ('ost New Work App)rop. (Cost Mlain't. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. ('ost o('ontributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. (Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1.272,444 1,284,900( 1,264,520 1,229,746 105:321 99,214 102,700) 107,217 2,310 1,332,000 1,384,577 1 9,00()0 16i)9,541 1,045,000 5,500,000 16,212,000 925,615 4,5:32,726 15,090,644 -- 12,6:37,)00 1,996,495 .. 2,237,274 2,358.655 2.761.00) :3.056,000 2,342,366 2.716.846 :3,()098,539 - -7 1 .0)00 ... -12,552 17.:300 .. 1:35,300 14.779 90,625 -- 9,7 (00 9,430 24,()00 23.801 11.10() 11,588 - 176,325,300 9,539 176,333,632 1,251,00(0 14,354,122 1,247,168 14,338,867 146,000 145,164 2,320,400 2,320,400 1,930,523 1,928,537 20),328,000 43,085,000 22,101,874 42,650,859 1,856,505 2,049,826 55,200 58,926 38,500 33,929 298.300 147,3,148 137,900 80,454 370.,000 :312,699 16,490,000 4,287,100 55,200 58,926 38,500 33,929 298,300 147,348 137,900 80,454 370.000 312,699 - 77.408,770 - 77,408,770 3,213,600 36,200.415 3,059,598 36.034,803 57,875 8.90(0 25,310 1)9,154 --. 50.653 5.000 5,000 71,000 7 0,427 26,2)0 25,310 1:35,300 123,933 90.625 50.653 827,050 827.050 257.755 257.754 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 43B. Almond Lake, NY 43C. Arkport Dam, NY 43D. Avoca, NY 43E. Binghamton, NY 43F. Canisteo, NY 43G. Corning, NY 43H. East Sidney Lake, NY 431. Elmira, NY 43J. Hornell, NY 43K. Lisle, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp... Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 301,106 295,354 138,638 138,743 8,300 6,285 26,200 24,087 45,800 44,160 50,200 49,386 690,852 690,098 15,500 14,825 313,400 318,055 147,000 147,298 4,000 3,840 17,000 18,770 18,000 15,218 48,530 49,112 341,700 431,023 8,600 9,200 1,469,293 2,007,150 1,453,919 2,020,870 19,200 18,895 43,000 43,051 351,000 351,775 171,000 170,494 13,200 13,377 38,200 36,542 45,900 50,331 53,000 53,189 374,000 372,058 19,000 19,075 578,900O 573,242 34,200 34,456 405,000 400,330 182,000 180,621 9,000 9,000 40,000 40,001 16,000 15,825 41,000 40,469 387,000 379,282 9,000 9,000 5,760,211 5,760,211 5,347,681 5,342,261 1,910,00027 1,910,00027 2,713,712 2,711,335 436,37428 436,37428 464,761 464,760 3,460,00029 3,460,00029 609,981 609,981 1,183,11130 1,183,11130 859,135 858,924 3,322,00031 3,322,00031 954,888 954,269 6,049,504 9,049,504 7,114,771 7,193,280 6,883,305 6,883,305 364,249 364,249 - 4,558,69832 - 4,558,69832 928,000 9,049,276 924,304 9,038,201 29,000 29,000 661,19933 661,19933 850,722 850,722 4-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 43L. Oxford, NY 43M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 43N. Whitney Point Village, NY 44. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston TWP, PA 45. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 46A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 46B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 47A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 47B. Curwensville Lake, PA New Work Approp. Cost MNaint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New \Vork Approp. Cost Mcaint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11,200 10,384 10,000 9,949 582,717 1,068,00() 582,411 1,047,249 18,600 17,986 270,535 150,653 316,681 314,459 (837,120()) 1,168,627 1,156,918 1,121,308 2,070,014 63,588 1,607,989 1,596,890 494,354 494,304 674,587 669,293 10,020 10,422 11,500 (35,676) 264,700 266,368 (1,114.000) 80,532 2,009,000 1,273,953 568,068 13,000 13,867 3,939 1,166,139 18,000 18,215 61,500 59,624 19,570 292,000 283,740 (170,000) 240 1,425,000 1,427,617 190,682 148,389 8,575 1,574,600 1,580,952 552,300 546,086 479,200 482,625 1,786,400 1,786,728 436,000 445,696 461,000 459,947 14,000() 14,000 417,000 414,021 14,000 14,00() 6,000 12,603 (148,765) (8,322) 251,000 253,118 131,00034 131,00034 274,932 274,932 5,421,539 5,421,539 7,834,296 7,972,030 424,096 424,096 437,281 437,282 426,000 425,960 166,235 126,225 5,725,700 5,725,700 4,040,590 4,033,495 - 107,576,700 - 107,574,623 1,396,600 12,964,181 1,389,862 12,939,250 (9,483) 13,495,276 120 13,388,733 - 19,244,800 - 19,244,800 1,987,600 19,975,843 1,968,298 19,950,866 - 7,103,001 - 7,103,001 558,000 8,837,076 544,881 8,833,324 - 20,396,060 - 20,396,060 537,000 10,851,576 534,874 10,845,381 4-30 IIAL.ifMOIRE, Ni) I)ISTIUlCT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Total to Sept. 30, 1993 47C. Foster Joseph Sa'ers 1)amm, PA 48. York, Indian Rockk 1)an, \PA New VWork 'Approp. Cost Mlaint. Approp. Cost New \VWork Approp. ('Cost " Maint. Approp. ('Cost 488,52.1 188,594 519,001 519,084 1,()001( )( i(: 1,153,7()() 997,228 1,155,730() 563,000 557,431 525,:1300 520,719 735,000 10,448,108 734,105 10,439,981 582,000 11,228,28037 571,843 11,215,61337 1. Includes $8,47(i t(r previous l)r(ijects. 2. 1nlcudes $8,467,()()003 or )revious )rojects. 3. Includes $96.5914 for sections of project in Nortidlk I)istrict. 4-1In.c ludes $94,.88:3 for sections of' )roject in Norfilk lDistrict. 5. Includes $230,().6() o)sre c(Itnis "o)fr oject in Norfilk l)ist rict. 6. 1ncluIdes $221.674 ()rs ections o(p)rt'j ect in Norbolk )istrict. 7. Includes $1.955.262 torse ct ions of proQject in Norfolk 1)ist rict 8. Includes $1.961,13401( for sections oVptr oject in Nortfolk )istrict. 9. Includes $5.793.000()tor sections of project in Norfolk )istrict. 10. Includes $5,992,.489 Ibr sections of project in Noriblk I)istifict. 11. Includes $:199.802 for previous projects. 12. Excludes $3,998 c(ittributed funds. 1:3. Excludes $8,998 contributed funds and includes $61,3121 for previous pr().octs. 14. Includes $38.011 for previous projects. 15. Excludes $2.2)0 for contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief fildcls. 16. 1 Iclu des $46.121 public works funds. 17. Exclutdes $5,000() contributed l'unds. 18. I ncludes $20.640 fir )previousp rojects. 19. Includes $283,,008 publie works funds and $167.185 emergency relief tI(ds' excIludes $5(0).( ),()()ri(l)b)ucteod nhtt i ds. 20(U)n.c onstru cted portion of thle project is i:tivC Iludess $20,500 for previous )rojects. 21. Jlcolstructed portion of tlhe project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 22. Includes $3,029,0()01 for previous project. 23. Includes $1, 831,609 for previous project. 241. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3. 1945 Hiver and Harbor Act. 25. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 conitributed ftunds. 26. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 27. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds 28. Incltides $109,944 emergency relief funds. 29. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 30. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 31. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 32. Includes $250.899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15.000 contributed funds. 3:3. Includes 871,557 emergency relief funds. 31.1In. cludes $73.465 emergency relief funds. :15. Excludes $26:3.900 contributed funds in accordance with the 'ri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system for public use. 36. Includes $11.588 emergency relief funds. :37. Includes $15.000 for deferred maintenance. 4-:31 30,887,063,35 "10,887,063-35 5,061,16736 5,061,1673i ___ _ ___ __ __ __~_~II_ __ REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized ANNAPOLIS HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, A channel 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide fron deep water in Severn River to a 1935 point opposite the city slip and an anchorage basin 12 feet deep in Spa Creek with local cooperation (no work was done under this project). Jun. 20, 1938 Modified to provide for the present project without local cooperation. BALT'IMORE HARBOR ANI) CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet (leep to had of' Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide lFort MclIenry I.o Port Covin gton entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Iar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Ilanover Street Bridge, widen a)pproaclles and bendls, and eonlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusionll of Pat'ipsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.2 Jan. 21. Change in location of anchorage near upper (end of Fort McIlenry (Channel. 1927 Jul. 3. 1930 Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3. For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to 1laltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Btaltimore lighlt to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17. For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of mnarginal wharf of U.S. O()rdinance I)epot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep fro(m the ocean through York Spit section 19415 and Craighill entrance to Fort McIlenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400)() feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a co()nnecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Mar. 2, Bridge. 1945 A chlannel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100) feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard Jul. 3, wharf. 1958 Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,00)0 feet wide in Cape Henry section at entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort MclHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 385 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware C(anal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch. in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 73d Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 11. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. 1)Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed Report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office. Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-32 2. -- -- Documents BALTI'IM)ORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channtiel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregullarly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. Jun.30, 1948 May 12, 1966 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 BALTIMORE IIARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. BONUM CREEK, VA A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth, 160 feet wide and 200 feet long. Protection of the entrance channel on both sides by jetties. The north jetty is about 700 feet long and south jetty is about 300 feet long. CAMBRIDGE IARBORt, MD Mar. 3, Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the drawbridge 10 feet deep and 100 1925 feet wide from the bridge to the upper end of the harbor with a turning basin. Aug. 26, Channel 14 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the head of the har- 1937 bor with widths of 150 feet below the Market St. Bridge in Cambridge and 100 feet above, and a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; for an anchorage basin 10 feet d(eep, 400 feet long, and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel and a second basin of the same depth 225 feet long and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the municipal boat basin. June 30, Modification providing for deepening of the channel in (Choptank River and 1948 Cambridge Creek to 16 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and of irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. June 16, Modification providing for Federal maintenance of locally constructed channel .1978 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep, from that depth in the Choptank River to and including a irregularly shaped turning basin of the same depth, with such modifications as in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advised at an added first cost to the United States presently estimated at $257,000. 6. Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7- foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act of 1948 Detailed Project Report, August 1965 H. Doc. 210, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 355, 95th Cong., 2 Sess. 1 E. Doc. 25, 42d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 380, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 4-33 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MI) Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from thie 6-foot contour in llerring Bay to 1930) the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensionlls, 7 feet deep and 60) feet wide, the 1938 turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. HIONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Aug.30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake 1935 Bay through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30. Modification provoding for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in longa River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water. 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay in deep water in Harris Creek, MD with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in 1935 Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Jul. 3, A channel 8 feet deep, 100 wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the 1930 entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep. 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD Aug. 26, A small boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at 1937 Nanticoke with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide protected on either side by stone jetties in the river. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent B13ay, 10 19353 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 19354 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19455 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep frbm the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 172 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 242, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 248, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-34 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. BALTIMORE, MD) DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15. ,JIun. 3. 1896 Aug. 30,. 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 . Sep. 13. 1954 P()COMOKE RIVER, MD A 9-tfoot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hlil. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to l'ocomoke River. Extend channel above bridge at Snow HIill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end. Channel I11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from lPocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence a channel of thile same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams lPoint, and dike construction along south side of chlannel from existing dike to 'tills Point. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, I)C-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct.27. ('ollection and removal of drift from waters of the P)otomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, )( area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Jul. 2, Control of lydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to 1986 clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting chlannel from open waters to eligible public use areas. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25. A channel 6,70)0 feet long an(d averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 19 )10 front of Alexandria between the throughli channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. POTOMAC RIVER AT MT. VERNON, MD Mlar. 3. (Channel 6 to 7 feet deep, 150 feet wide, from l)otomnac River channel to Mount 1879 Vernon wharf, with turning basin at wharf. Channel increased to 9- to 10-foot depth, 200-foot width, turning basin to have 200-foot radius. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 8, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 1958 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) 22. Jan. 22, 1982 Sec. 107 July. 14, 1960 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 1, 1968 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide at mean low water from the northern limit of existing Rhodes Point to T'ylerton Federal navigation channel, a distance of about one mile, through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 50 feet wide from Tylerton to Rhodes Point via Rhodes Point Gut. Modification providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Shanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and 400 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. Annual Report for 1895, p. 1167. H. Doc. 227, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 429, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc, 486, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc, 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1879, vol. 1, p. 83. Annual Report, 1888, vol. 1, p. 814. H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1959 Detailed Project Report, June 1981 H. Doc. 51, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Detailed Project Report, February 1968 4-35 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SIAUGHTER CREEK, MD ,ul. 25. A channel 7 feet deep and 100() feet wide at mean low water through the bar at 1912 the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. WASHINGTON HIIARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia ('iannel, from (Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant, (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wi(de to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Chlannel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25.000 feet; Washington Chlannel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15.00 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush \Vashington ('hannel. 25. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25. 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3. 1930 WICOMICO RIVER, MI) Channel 9 feet d(feepfrl)o m Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie A B11a.22 --ffoooott cchhaannlnneell bbeellooww tthhee MMaaiinn SSttrreeeett BBrriiddggee.. . Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide: depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs 1937 and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3. Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped harbor. ATI.ANTIC COAST OF MARYIAND Nov. 17. Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the D)elaware 1986 line; a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to F'ourth Street;, and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the D)elaware line. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Sep. 15, Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the bank 1980 behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach S area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. ANACOSTIA RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION & NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, D.C. & MD. May 17, Channel improvements, levees, pumping stations with connecting storm sew- 1950 ers, pressure conduit and relocation and reconstruction of 4 highway bridges and 1 railroad bridge. 24. 4-36 23. Hf. D)oc. 87, 62nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. l H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947 H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 2 H.Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 Detailed Project Report, May 1980 H. Doc. 202, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 29. 30. 31. BALTIMORE, MDI) I)ISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents CHESAPEAKE BAY AT IIOOPERSVILLE ROAD, MD Oct. 6, Stone revetment, 390 feet long, that ties into existing shoreline structures that, 1988 protect an endangered roadway. Sec. 14 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. LOCK HAVEN, PA Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the 1986 West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. McCREADY'S POINT ROAD, MD Oct. 6, Construction of two segmented offshore breakwaters, each 130 feet long, sepa- 1988 rated by a gap width of 70 feet. Sec. 14 MIDDLE HOOPER ISLAND, MI) (Oct. 6, 1988 Sec. 14 Construction of five segmented offshore breakwaters, each 150 feet long, separated by gap widths of 100 feet. PETERSBURG, WV Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 1990 ments to the flood warning system. Oct. 23, 1962 RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOLOMON CREEK, ASHLEY BOROUGH, LUZERNE CO, PA July 11, Consists of restoration which will include the placement of compacted backfill 1988 material and the construction ofa gabion wall approximately 24 feet in length along the alignment of the collapsed stone masonry wall. SOLOMONS ISLAND, CALVERT COUNTY, MD July 11, Constuction of a stone revetment along the 500-foot reach of shoreline in order 1988 to stabilize the deteriorating steel bulkhead and prevent roadway subbase material from moving through the revetment. 33. 4-37 :32. Feasibility Report dated Nov. 1991 H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong., Feasibility Report dated Sep. 1990 Feasibility Report dated Jul. 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1990 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Feasibility Report, August 25, 1989 Detailed Project Report, May 31, 1989 34. 35. 36. 37, 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1.993 TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISIATION Project and Work Authorized Documents 43. Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1(941: Dec. 22, 1944: May 17. 1950; and Jul. 3. 1958 Jan. 26. 1989 Sec. 14 Aug. 18. 1941 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, (C.orning and other towns in New York and Pennsyivania. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIIP, PA Consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 87() feet of stone riprap. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jil. 3. Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga- Hammond reservoirs, local flood pro- 1958 tection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22. Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relo- 1976 cate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Sec- 1983 tion 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 Pl, 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). Sep. 3. 1954 WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Construction of three flood control reservoirs. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock D)am and chlannel improvements on Codorus 1936 Creek. H. D)oc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Initial Appraisal Report Nov. 1985 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from PIort Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program Sep-. tember 16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relief Program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-38 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. - - -- BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Rel)ort See Annual Operation and Project Status Rep)ort Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA1 Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ - Anacostia River and Flats2 l)eferred 1953 3,910,582 Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4653 11,770 Back Creek, MI) Cofmpleted 1946 23,061 41,378 Black Walnut IHIarbor, MI) Completed 1982 32,631 431,478 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River. VA Completed 1950 15,755 17,675 BretonIt Bay. M) " (Completed 1950 47,9244 12,621 Broad ('reek River, l)E Completed 1964 64,5105 133,088 Broad C(reek, MI) C( omipleted 1962 28,227 104,215 Choptank River. MNID) C( olpleted 1979 96,796 94,095 Claiborie Hlarbor, MI) 1 Deferred 1987 42,974 681,933 Corsica River, ID) ('onlmpleted 1948 39,0717 106,565 Crisfield IHarbor. NiI) ('Completed 1990 349,1548 1,771,351 Cypress C('reek. MlD) (ompleted 1947 3,057 14,729 Di)uck lPoint Cove. MI) Completed 1982 25,289 334,396 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, M)1 Completed 1932 90,12110 53,80811 Fishing Bay, MD Completed 1990 33,87412 1,580,906 Fishing Creek, Mil) ('ompleted 1991 111,242 1,841,803 Goose Creek, MI) 1 3 (ompleted 1973 75,900 8,312 Herring Creek, NID)( Completed 1989 1,506,259 148,329 Island Creek, NIl)D Completed 1948 6,230 54,828 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MI) Completed 1988 23,836 478,035 La Trappe, MI) (Completed 1980 8,06414 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, NilMD Completed 1958 23,000 7,327 Lowes Wharf, Ml) Completed 1986 2,100 322,080 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 25,143 Lower Thorofaire, Deal Island, MD Completed 1988 1,787,15815 640,938 Madison Bay, MI) 1 3 ('Comprleted 1977 125,550 33,353 Manokin River. NIDI) Completed 1919 34,78817' 43,534 Middle River and Dark HeaId ('reek. ID) Con)mpleted 1947 38,71518 50,934 Muddy Hood and Tyler Coves, Ml) Completed 1990 64,001 666,075 Nan Cove, NID 3 Completed 1965 34,86119 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, M)I o Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork ) DE and MID Completed 1990 143,13420 1,097,524 Neabsco Creek, MI) Completed 1978 14,600 14,800 Neale Sound, NID Completed 1991 12,60021 903,450 Neavitt Harbor, NlIDI1'3 ('ompnletedl 1968 36,500 34,533 Nomini Bay and C(reek, VA 22 (Completed 1946 78,446 . 42,063 Occoquan Creek, VA9 Completed 1971 66,25323 203,198 Parish Creek, MI) Completed 1988 1.9,17024 525,886 Patuxenit River, MD 9 C ompleted 1905 14,00025 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC. Eliminationi of Waterchestiut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MID) (Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, )C1 Completed 1956 1,744,69226 27,46127 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85828 321,803 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,50029 71,059 Shad Landing State Park, MI) Completed 1966 33,53130 19,198 Shallow Creek, MI) 13 Completed 1989 278,100 - St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,94731 646,618 St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 - St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1991 44,35732 719,788 St. Michaels Harbor, MD 13 Completed 1964 16,72333 14,403 4-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1993 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. Patricks Creek. MD Completed 1987 15,752 141,506 St. Peters Creek. M1 (Completed 19683l 16,740 : 4 31,716 Smith Creek, MD C(ompleted 19:36 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre D)e Grace, M D (Completed 1985 293,5703"i 849,350 Susquehqanna River at Williamsport, PAl Completed 1974 57,0313 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, Ml)D (Completed 1983 424,80037 395,785 Town Creek, MD ('Completed 195() 43,220 41,959 Tred Avon River, ND Completed 1988 523,310 845,243 Tuckahoe River, II) Completed 198() 9,727 23,489 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD Completed 1992 193,175 3,399,192 Tyaskin Creek, MI) Completed 1923 16,29738 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek. VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Upper Thorofare. NiD C(ompleted 1987 62,446 814,657 Warwick River, NID Completed 1984 22,041 , 148,728 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was d(leauthorized 20. Includes $5,00() for previous project. August 5, 1977. 2 1. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 22. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 3. Includes $31,065 for previous project. November 6, 1977. 4. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 23. Includes $25,00)0 for previous project. 5. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 24. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration 6. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the pro- funds. ject was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 25. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 1979. 26. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 27. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds 8. Includes $87,740 for previous project. expended for waterchestnut removal. 9. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 28. Includes $19,000 for previous project. November 2. 1979. 29. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 10. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes 30. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. $8,414 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 11. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 32. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 12. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 33. Excludes $61)0 contributed funds. 13. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 34. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $1,100 contributed fhinds. 35. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 15. Includes $5,000 for previous project. November 6. 1977. Includes 822,905 Works Progress funds and 16. Abandonment recommended in 1926 H. doc. 4.167. 69th $97,39() for l)revious project. Cong., 1st Sess.) 36. Excludes $410,000 contributed funds. 17. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 37. Excludes 816,409 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy I)epartment and 38. Includes $10,158 for previous project. $52,000 from contributed funds. 39. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 19. Excludes $565 contributed funds. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1993 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD 1 Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 4-40 IIALTIMORE, MDI) DISTRICT TABLE 4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1993 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MI)1 Completed 1977 $ 1,000,0002 - Bainbridge, NY2,3 Comlpleted 1959 382,000 Bath, NY4 Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV 3 Completed 1965 55,2185 - Black Walnut Point, MD) Completed 1985 200,500 - Bridgewater, VA3 Completed 1953 136,500 - Bull Run, PA Completed 1984 2,742,000 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY3 Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY6 Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5347 - Forest Heights, MD3 Completed 1964 430,0008' - Fourmile Run, VA Completed 1987 52,480,000 - Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD Completed 1989 186,077 - Greene, NY3 Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,3949 - Kitzmiller, MD3 Completed 1965 501,50010 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD3I ) Completed 1992 972,988 - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY3 C(ompleted 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY4 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,68911 Savage River Dam, MI) Completed 1954 2,271,93912 33,999 Scranton, PAl 3 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,00014 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tunkhannock Creek, T'lunkhannock, PA Completed 1991 174,49115 Tyrone, PA16 l)eferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,00017 Upper Marlboro, MD, Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA18 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92719 - Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45720 - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89321 Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,549,098 - 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 7. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 10. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 11. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 12. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 13. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 14. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 16. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 17. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 18. Authorized for the design memorandum state of advanced engineering and design. 19. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 20. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 21. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-41 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THiE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY1.2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels. MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MI) Breton Itay, IMD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek. M) Cadle Creek. iM2D) Cambridge Harbor, NMDI (1948 River & Harbor Act Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Chester River. MD) (1873 River & Harbor Act Coan River, VA 1970 192() 196() 195() 1949 1949 1989 1940 1988 19.37 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 Copes Corner Lakes, NY2 Cuckold Creek, MDI)4 Curuinghill Cove, MID 4 Davenport Center Lake, NY2 Fall Brook Lake, PA5 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MDI Harpers Ferry, WV May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1966 Water Reg. l)ev. Act l)ec. 31, 1989 1986 Water lRes. I)ev. Act l)ec. 31, 1989 1986 Water lies. D)ev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. D)ev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. I)ev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. )ev. Act D)ec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. I)ev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan 22. 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. I)ev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-42 $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,72() 11,200 286,400- 46,100 214,5783 BALTIMORE, MI) DISTRICT TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hellens Creek, MD) Lake Ogleton, MI) Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, M) (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River. MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD) Sixes Bridge Lake, I) & PA6 South Plymouth Lake, NY \Vaterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1958. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-43 1950 1950 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 1939 1970 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water lies. l)ev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Rlies. D)ev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Ries. D)ev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Rles. I)ev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act D)ec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Rles. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Ries. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 7,9283 14,600 100,0363 305 189,1003 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Broad Creek Black Walnut Harbor, MD Choptank River, MD Duck Point Cove, MD Fishing Bay, MD Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Neale Sound, MD Ocean City, MD St. Catherine Sound, MD) Shallow Creek, MD Susquehanna River above and below Havre de Grace, MI) Town Creek, MD TABLE 4-I March 1993 May 1993 April 1993 May 1993 June 1993 March 1993 February 1993 February 1993 July 1993 April 1993 ,July 1993 August 1993 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage River Dam Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge-Newton Creek Bath-Cohocton River Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Comrning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Jothnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Oneonata Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville Milton Plymouth Scranton October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 September 1993 October 1992 October 1992 4-44 --- ~---- - -- -- --- BALTIMORE, MD I)ISTRICT TABLE 4-I (Continued) Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Date Inspected Sunbury Swoyersville-Forty Fprt Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hantover 'Twp. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewvater Fourmile Run District of Columbia & MDI) Projects Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley September 1993 October 1992 O)ctobl)er 1992 October 1992 September 1993 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 4-45 _ _I_ __ __ i __ ___ _ __ NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project forPocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION 1. Appomattox River, VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, and St. Johns River, FL . . . . . . . . 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) ............. 4. Channel to Newport News, VA . . . 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA . . . . . . .. 6. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) . . 7. James River, VA ............ 8. Lafayette Rivert . ........... 9. Norfolk Harbor, VA .......... 10. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA . . . . . 11 Rudee Inlet, VA ............. 12. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) . 13. Waterway on the Coast of VA .. 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization....... BEACH EROSION CONTROL 15 Virginia Beach. VA......... 16 Beach Erosion Control......... Under Special Authorization PA VA . VA GE FLOOD CONTROL PAGE 5-2 17. James R. Olin Flood Control Project ........... 5-6 18. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA . . . . . . . . 5-6 5-2 19. Richmond Local Flood Protection, VA . . . . . .... 5-7 20. Richmond Filtration Plant .... . . . . . . . . .... 5-7 5-2 Flood Protection 5-3 21. Emergency Flood Control Activities ........... .5-7 5-3 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 22. Surveys ............................. 5-7 5-3 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............. 5-7 5-3 TABLES 5-4 TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement . . . . . . .... 5-8 5-4 TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation. ............. 5-11 5-5 TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks . . . . 5-14 5-5 TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . 5-15 TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..... . . . . . . . . . . . 5-16 5-5 TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . . 5-16 5-5 TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys . . . 5-17 .... .. 5-6 ....... 5-6 ... .... 5-6 5-1 I . . . . . . . . Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 Navigation 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell. VA. The portion uinder improvement extends from its mouih to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 1 1 miles, which is the length of the.tidal and navigable reach. (See U.S. Coast Geodetic Survey Chart No. 531.) Previous Projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run: thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep: and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below: for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 3.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal Facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract which was underway in FY 92 but delayed due to creosote-loden'appearance of the material was completed in FY 93, and the 260,000 remaining cubic yards were removed. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location.Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection of canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for FY 1938. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on the 5-year operation and maintenance contract, awarded Feb 88 is progressing. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 3A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. 3B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet d(eep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions nmean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. 3C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12221.) Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of inrregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design, and supervision and inspections. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 112,000 cubic yards of material. 4. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 400.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New work coordination with the sponsor regarding the scheduling of additional deeping, and dredge material management alternatives. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 40,000 cubic yards from the two 45 foot deep anchorages. 5. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between April 20 and May 29, 1992 removed 148,420 cubic yards from the Entrance Channel, and from July 27 to August 29, 1992 removed 58,754 cubic yards from the Inner Harbor and 74,247 cubic yards from the Lewis Creek Reach. 6. HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 7. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide form the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock: a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep: a tumrning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap. 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal. located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 367,500 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,399,752. 8. LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. Location. This river is a tidal estuary of Hampton Roads. formed by two branches lying wholly in the city of Norfolk, Va. The two branches, each about 2 miles long, flow from the northeast and southeast and join at a point about 3.5 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to the Hampton Boulevard bridge, thence 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 100 feet long, a total length of approximately 4.0 miles. East Haven is located at the upstream limits of the Lafayette River project, immediately downstream of the Granby Street Bridge, and provides for a channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Lafayette River to the upstream end of the creek, a distance of approximately 2, 500 feet. All depths referred to mean low water. For details of prior projects see 1969 Annual Report. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperations. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Terminal facilities. See Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 27,300 cubic yards of material. 9. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 400 and 452.) Previous Projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. SOUTHERN BRANCH: A channel 45 feet deep and 450 feet wide from the junction with the Eastern Branch to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railway Bridge; thence 45 feet deep and 375 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge; thence 40 feet deep and 250 feet to 500 feet wide to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge; thence 35 feet deep and 250 to 300 feet wide to a point 0.8 mile above Interstate 64 high level bridge. Project includes an approach and turning basin 45 feet deep opposite the Norfolk Naval Shipyard; a turning basin at the mouth of St. Julians Creek 40 feet deep, 400 to 600 feet long, and 800 feet wide; a turning basin at the mouth of Milldam Creek 40 feet deep and 800 feet square and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek, the upstream end of the project, 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT ANCHORAGES: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1.500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. DISPOSAL AREA: a disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with the sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additional deepening, and dredge material management alternatives. Maintenance: The annual dredging contract for fiscal year 1992 was rescheduled to fiscal year 1993 due to contractor protest. A total of 2,691,878 cubic yards were removed during FY 93. Operation and Maintenance of the Craney Island Dredged Material Management Area continued. 10. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chespeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 45 feet deep at mean low water with auxiliary channels 450 feet wide and 32 feet deep at mean low water adjoining each side of 1,000-foot channel. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. "See Norfolk Harbor, Va.," "Channel to Newport News, Va.," etc. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 536,500 cubic yards of material. Periodic maintenance dredging will continue. 11. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 110 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Complied with for initial dredging as a Federal project in fiscal year 1991. Local interests are to financially participate in continued annual maintenance at an increasing rate as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 87,600 cubic yards of material. 12. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969. the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken or abandoned vessels. A derrickboat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 13. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesalpeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract removed 199,700 cubic yards during FY 93. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District continued work on four studies: Hunting/Gilford Creeks, VA; Back River, Poquoson, VA; York and Pamunkey Rivers, VA: and Newport News Creek, VA. Two new studies, Kings Creek, Cape Charles, Va. and Newmarket Creek, Hampton, Va. were terminated based on a negative initial appraisal. Total expenditure anounted to $146.415. Beach Erosion Control 15. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia- North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The 1974 modification which provides for structural and nonstructural improvements was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Structural measures will be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This will include maintaining the beach and construction of a seawall from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 58th Street to 89th Streets. Local cooperation. The city of Virginia Beach has complied with the 1962 requirements. Cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, will be required for construction of the 1974 modification. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 modification project is in the preconstruction engineering and design phase. A General Re-evaluation Report was recently completed recoinmending the construction of a vertical steel sheet-pile wall with a top elevations of 13.5 NGVD from Rudee Inlet to 58th street, an enhanced dune with a crest elevation of 18 feet NGVD from 58th street to 89th street, and a beach beam with a crest width of 100 feet at an elevation of 9 feet NGVD from Rudee Inlet to 89th street. 16. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The district continued work on one study: Cape Charles City Harbor, VA. Expenditures totaled $26,912. Flood Control 17. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (Formerly- Buena Vista, Va.) Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the river's origin and about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of some 649 square miles. Existing projects. The recommended plan of improvement provides for a combination earth levee and floodwall along the left bank of the river for nearly the full length of the city. The main features of the plan are (a) an 11,900-foot combination riprapped levee and floodwall, extending to high ground just upstream of Universal Match Company to high ground downstream from General Cable Corporation at a point near the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge across the Maury River; (b) 4,000 feet of improved channel in the Maury River, provided by straightening and widening the existing channel to a bottom width of 200-300 feet, for the purpose of eliminating a backwater effect upstream, which would otherwise increase natural flood damage to the property located in that area; (c) diversion of internal runoff from surface sources and from Indian Gap Run and Pedlar Gap Run into an abandoned canal bed, appropriately improved for a distance of 7,400 feet downstream and thence discharged by gravity, into the Maury River; and (d) a 2.270 foot concrete ringwall at the Georgia Bonded Fibers manufacturing facility. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (City of Buena Vista) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and maintain and operate all works after completion. Operations during the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning, design, and engineering was in progress. The first construction contract is expected to be awarded in May 1994. 18. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1.684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2.530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations dutiring fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, watercontrol management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 19. RICHMOND LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION, VA Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Hflenrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bantik and the industrial-comnmercial complex on the south bank. Previous project. None. Existing project. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in House Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $134,000,000. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed with the city of Richmond on June 16, 1986. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was initiated December 1988. The final contract to construct the remaining 800 feet of floodwall was awarded December 1993. Completion is scheduled for October 1994. 20. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA. Location: The Richmond Water Filtration Plant is located in the City of Richmond, Virginia bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. Existing project: As a result of Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972, the water filtration plant was flooded and the estimated 400,000 population served was without potable water supply for over five days and without fire protection for over three days. The project will provide flood protection of the municipal water supply treatment plant from a flood having a recurrence of 360 years. The project will provide flood protection by enclosing three sides of the water filtration plant with a floodwall and tying into high ground. The wall will have an average height of about nine feet with a top elevation of 117.0 fee MSL. The project will be built through one contract over two years. Local cooperation: The city of Richmond, Virginia is the local sponsor, a Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled to be executed with the City of November 1994. Operations during the Fiscal Year: Preconstruction engineering and design were in progress. In FY 94, Congress added $1,000,000 for construction of the project. The Administration does not support funding for the project because the lack of flood protection at the filtration plant is considered a design deficiency and should be undertaken by local interests. Project plans, specifications and environmental documentation will be complete in June 1994. 21. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 93, $213,859 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program, and $267,293 on the Disaster Preparedness Program. General Investigations 22. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $609,714. The work performed consisted of a navigation study of the James River, $2,423; flood damage prevention studies, $232,785: special studies, $11,886; review of the AIWW Bridge Replacement, $244,056; miscellaneous activities consisting of special investigations, intragency water resources development, North American Waterfowl Management Plan amounting to $49,673; coordination studies with other agencies and states, $67,712 and preauthorization studies, $1,179. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of basic data was $197,956 consisting of $40,412 for Management Service Unit, $98,699 for Technical Services, and $58,845 for various studies consisting of Va. Beach Hurricane evacuation study, Thalia Creek and Environmental Data Studies. 5-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKSACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 To 30 Sep 1993 In Text 1. Appommattox River, VA S(Regular Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, VA and the ,St. John's River, FL (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 4. Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 7. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lafayette River, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost Recreation Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - - - - 870,341 . . . - 870,341 212,025 270,128 1,763,859 1,673,600 777,234 5,586,039 211,957 266,423 1,755,304 1,670,788 743,971 5,537,636 - - . - 3,866,37 1/ . . . - 3,688,372 2,255,274 3,479,644 4,707,862 3,562,589 181,168 64,539,928 2/ 3,046,911 3,373,880 4,641,338 3,590,029 244,056 64,457,149 - - - - 479,947 - . . . 479,947 - - - - 59,871 - - - 59,871 319,453 323,236 334,020 1,344,891 231 331 1,424,410 1,780,206 - .. - 8,015,073 3/ S- - - 8,015,073 96,594 230,660 1,955,262 729,643 13,664,108 94,883 221,674 1,959,561 729,596 13,656,803 1,010,871 - - - 4,097,117 6/ - - - - 4,097,117 78,921 53,000 1,270,326 286,576 7,452,462 70,485 60,741 1,271,031 286,282 7,452,168 - - - - 4,918,544 - . . 4,695,108 - - - 227,000 - - - - 227,000 713,341 800,686 450,997 1,412,747 906,104 11,178,531 723,695 793,577 457,354 1,412,571 906,950 11,178.054 - - - - 3,850 - - - - 3,850 193,000 204,400 216,000 496,000 615,000 5,116,384 193,000 189,096 231,304 485,169 621,892 5,112,445 .... 7,639,904 5/ .... 7,639,904 902,219 1,762,027 1,061,066 1,517,949 960,566 36,464,214 898,399 1,249,130 1,578,387 1,518,707 521,945 36,025,196 - - - - 413,456 - - - - 379,792 - - 242,027 - - 242,027 - 327,275 480,873 - 326,020 479,618 5 -8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLES 5- A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See ................................................................................... Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 89 In Text 9. Norfolk Harbor, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp 1,015,121 Cost 1,1851908 Maint Approp 3,384,391 Cost 3,633,105 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp 104,989 Cost 145,452 10. Thimble Shoal New Work Channel, VA Approp - (Regular Funds) Cost - Maint Approp - Cost - 11 Ruddee Inlet, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost 1,799 Maint Approp Cost - (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp 50,000 Cost 6,592 12 .Supervision of the Maint Harbor of Hampton Approp 518,000 Roads, VA (Prevention Cost 536,031 of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 13. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 15. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) 16. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization 17. James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA (Regular Funds) 18. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA 19. Richmond, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Approp Cost 996,215 999,506 62,088 513,000 157,402 4,797 FY 90 FY 91 1,815,129 813,749 2,508,553 2,500,064 53,836 441,441 5,466,669 5,444,477 13,092 FY 92 100,000 290,672 3,354,059 3,360,293 274 FY 93 To 30 Sep 1993 250,000 7,045,632 6/ 247,459 6,790,775 5,623,170 102,233,853 5,614,531 102,195,739 1,805,451 6/ - 1,762,697. - - 13,534,967 - - 13,534,967 - 1,696,041 12,557,335 - 1,696,413 12,333,730 37,000 584,949 36,093 579,568 - 70,000 - 67,723 - 138,100 42,940 35,631 7,866 723,243 725,502 210,000' 254,668 528,303 526,725 47,000 47,045 872,949 873,489 1,321,546 1,319,950 445,100 386,876 473,500 494,000 308,000 283,694 8,064,018 472,765 495,662 306,574 282,038 8,060,669 899,530 877,747 67,249 358,138 22,632 898,584 921,7895 76,993 (14,000) 66,445 18,072 1,271,274 1,218,254 140,830 900,000 716,366 13,729 - 850,498 - 850,498 1,201,589 17,924,422 1,256,600 17,922,641 146,415 850,000 9,596,195 983,318 9,511,431 26,912 - 604,644 1,565,000 1,831,000 300,000 4,300,644 - 493,403 1,415,058 1,244,937 214,006 3,367,404 1,086,000 1,214,736 981,537 1,159,993 1,221,310 981,540 3,800,000 3,339,978 90,012 19,562,999 13,717,076 3,019,978 2,908,710 5-9 22,700,000 28,159,456 5,494,337 4,176,021 -= 1,357,721 1,362,875 26,813,000 27,533,293 5,515,000 6,105,961 74,400 74,400 15,742,000 14,810,626 1,816,000 192,607 80,970,527 80,970,527 13,919,558 13,907,950 92,784,000 91,473,715 15,835,326 13,383,299 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLES 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 To 30 Sep 1993 In Text 20. Emergency Flood Cost 174,385 210,475 199,488 407,392 481,152 Control Activities 21.Surveys Cost 550,842 1,000,046 712,350 492,259 609,714 22.Collection and Cost 154,051 248,829 133,214 150,078 197,956 Study of Basic Data 1 Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 Includes $52,804 for previous projects. 3 Cost prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD" (Baltimore District). Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, VA; Cape Henry Channel, VA and Rappahannock Channel,. VA. 4 Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended military funds for construction of a wharf. 5 Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6 Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. 5-10 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 TABLE 5-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Mar. 3,1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1909 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21,1927 Mar. 2, 1945 APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) Jul. 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 Jun. 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Jul. 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep; 1,000 feet wide Dec. 31,1970 Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Jul. 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Dec. 31,1970 Channel width increased to 1.000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan.21, 1927 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40- feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 6 of Text) Existing Project Annual Report 1874, pt. 11 p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 223, 76th Cong., 1st sess.(1) H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 3rd sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 589, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess.1 Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept, 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 190, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 550, 61st cong.,2nd sess. H. Doc. 486, 67th Cong., 4th sess. H. Doc. 143, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. Approved in 1972 HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 8 of Text) May 17, 1950 Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and specified in Act its tributary waters JAMES RIVER, VA (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes 5-11 S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. Documents Jul. 5, 1884 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26. 1937 Mar. 2,1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 14; 1960 (Sec. 107) Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Mar. 2, 1907 Jun 25, 1910 Aug. 8. 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17. 1986 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Removal of Trigg cofferdam Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LAFAYETTE RIVER, VA. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Hampton Roads to Hampton Blvd. bridge. Knitting Mill Creek modification East Haven Creek modification NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 11 of Text) HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep SOUTHERN BRANCH Jun. 25, 1910 Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet Aug. 8. 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Mar. 30, 1925 Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge Aug. 30, 1935 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square Jun. 30, 1948 Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge. 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek Oct. 22, 1976 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 40-foot portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge Jul. 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & harbors Comm. Doc.5. 75th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1967. Apprioved in 1979 H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 5-12 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents %Alr00YOOP L COA LItb% WET I EN BMRANIn Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK Jul. 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge ANCHORAGES, 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1.200-foot swinging radius Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 14 of Text) Jul. 14, 1960 Project Authorized (Sec. 107) Existing Project Approved in 1986 THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channel on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Channel 45 feet deepa nd 1,000 feet wide. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 16 of Text) Jun. 25. 1910 Existing project adopted Mar. 2, 1945 Project modified VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 18 of Text) Project authorized Project modified Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Project Modified Participation after Feb. 6, 1987 Cost Sharing JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (See Section 21 of Te (Formerly BUENA VISTA, VA) Nov. 28, 1990 Project authorized Oct. 5,1992 Name of Project Changed Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 22 of Text) Jul. 24. 1946 Project authorized H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. RICHMOND, VA (See Section 23 of Text) Aug. 15. 1985 Existing project H. Doc. 178, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. 5-13 H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Unpublished Report H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 216. 99th Cong., 2nd sess. xt) Chief of Engineers Report, July 27. 1990 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3. 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7. 1974 Oct. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 5, 1992 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 2 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Available Miter Sills Year Miles of for Full Character Opened Construction From Location Chamber Width Lift Upper Lower of to Cost Norfolk, VA feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation 12.4, Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 Chesapeake Canal and shells (Great Bridge, VA) 10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 Canal (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $373,226 Canal with cutoff walls (South Mills, NC) 116 feet at mean low water. 5-14 TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1993 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For 1992 Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Aberdeen Creek, VA2 Appomattox River, VA 1 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA Bennett Creek, VA Blackwater River, VA Active portion 2 10 Broad Creek. VA2 Cape Charles, VA Carters Creek, VA Active portion 2 3 Channel to Newport News, VA Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf2 Chesconessex Creek, VA2 Chincoteague Bay, VA Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA Chowan River, NC2 Cockrells Creek, VA4 Cranes Creek, VA Davis Creek, VA 2 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA Deep Creek, Newport News, VA 2 Dymers Creek, VA 2 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA Greenvale Creek, VA2 Hampton Creek, VA Horn Harbor, VA2 Hoskins Creek, VA2 Jackson Creek, VA2 Jarvis Creek, VA4 Kings Creek, VA4 Lafayette River, VA 2 Little Machipongo River, VA Little River (Creek), VA 2 12 Locklies Creek, VA 2 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA Mattaponi R;ver. VA Meherrin River, VA Millford Haven VA2 Mill Creek, VA Mulberry Creek, VA 2 Nandua Creek, VA 2 Nansemond River, VA6 Newport News Creek, VA2 Nottoway River, VA2 Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion2 Onancock River, VA 2 5 Oyster Channel, VA 2 Pagan River, VA 2 6 Pamunkey Riverd VA Active portion Parker Creek, VA Parrotts Creek, VA2 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot2 Queens Creek 2 Quinby Creek, VA Rappahannock River, VA 9 11 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA 4 Starlings Creek, VA Tangier Channels, VA Taskinas Creek, VA Thimble Shoal Channel, VA13 Totuskey Creek, VA Tylers Beach Harbor, VA 2 1975 1992 1991 1992 1975 1986 1989 1951 1992 1944 1950 1968 1984 1985 1975 1949 1992 1971 1974 1991 1953 1988 1991 1989 1990 1990 1971 1979 1957 1982 1990 1966 1928 1991 1971 1987 1950 1937 1950 1950 1978 1992 1986 1951 1963 1991 1950 1964 1991 1957 1947 1991 1991 1983 1950 1991 1992 1975 1991 1970 1982 109,643 $870,341 608,255 442,602 342,118 27,888 622,644 28,398 4,097,117 11,500 14,855 25,516 25,126 49,396 107,220 6,274 97,612 83,000 288,278 5,582 68,656 20,003 186,237 13,987 44,100 8,500 39,259 5,593 242,047 211,990 168,623 11,581 459,612 83,836 47,734 24,568 5,445 2,393 6,988 167,477 181,354 44,295 13,859 187,914 119,117 51,425 31,376 15,530 37,045 165,566 26,949 104,176 414,633 66,242 116,550 7,479 17,934,772 167,869 311,201 221,827 4,794,436 181,317 687,931 2,455,068 3,277 7,105,648 64,919 38,634 45,772 506,288 217,592 639,871 213,105 163,916 3,304,972 4,610 6,278 614,673 1,219,638 348,035 1,625,536 37,714 364,574 533,700 566,521 64,517 2,989,628 209,040 54,764 33,419 21,536 2,458 109,991 503,323 432,907 8,734 92,044 526,041 778,498 336,416 161,183 560,558 54,575 66,162 442,606 1,500,429 1,962,057 1,106,489 3,470,909 135 14,789,255 451,293 773,996 104,621 19,300 500 4,965,108 1,200 2,500 5,700 4,000 7,763 62,969 500 188,962 1,211 16,955 43,000 5-15 3,459,868 2,000 TABLE 5-D Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1993 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1993 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds 1993 Urbanna Creek, VA27 1963 55,724 113,300 Whitings Creek, VA 1990 21,630 429,610 500 Winter Harbor, VA2 1981 171,334 340,837 2,973 Willoughby Channel, VA2 1953 8,500 98,752 Wishart Point Channel, VA2 1975 118,762 102,594 30,625 York River, VA Active portion2 1986 180,904 302,068 Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 8 2 In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. Completed. 9Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 3In addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 1Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 4Inactive. "Includes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects 5Includes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for pre- 12Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work vious projects. 13 1n addition, $143,000 for maintenance was expended from contributed 6Includes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. funds. 7In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1993 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintence Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 $471,474 632 $176,671 Hampton Institute, VA 1976 $156,906 1,589 $175,845 Rapidan River, Orange, VA 1984 45,000 Saxis Island, VA 1987 $273,600 - $ 3,145 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 1990 $2,478,825 2,008 1,379,371 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1993 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds 1993 Newmarket Creek, VA 1970 1,000,000 13,495 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, VA 1973 1,851,933 46,930 516,256 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 1985 478,2241 - Scottsville, VA 1989 3.431,746 12,024 32,954 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA 1990 4,692,063 53,739 216,596 'Preconstruction planning terminated. 5-16 TABLE 5-G Atlantic Ocean Char Atlantic Ocean Char Baltimore Harbor an Rappahannock Sh( Chincoteague Inlet Cranes Creek Chani Deep Creek Channe Hoskins Creek Char James River: White Rocklanding Shoa Little Creek Channel Lower Northlanding Newport News Cree Norfolk Harbor: Channel Connec Thimble Shoal Elizabeth River- Onancock River Ch Oyster Channel Plac Queens Creek Chan Quinby Creek Chanr Placement Site RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR nel Aug 93 nel to Thimble Shoal Channel Aug 93 d Channels: oal Channel May 93 Oct 92 nel Jun 93 ~l (Newport News) Nov 92 nel Nov 92 Shoal Lt. to I Channel Jun 93 Oct 92 River Channel Aug 93 k Channel Sep 93 ting Norfolk Harbor and Channel Jun 93 Eastern Br. Jun 93 annel Jul 93 ement Site Sep 93 nel Jun 93 nel Dec 92 Jun 93 TYPE OF SURVEY Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condtion Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition 5-17 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT* This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to theAtlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and 3Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries fbr navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control ................ . 6-2 (R & HI Act of 1965) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla, (Wilmington District) ............... 6-2 3. Beaufort H arbor, N.C ...................6.-4................. 4. Cape Fear River, N.C. Above Wilmington ... ......................... 6-4 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C................ .....6.-5.... 6. Drum Inlet, N.C. ........................... . . .6-5 7. Lockwoods Folly River, N C ...............6.-.5............ 8. Mlanteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C ............6.-.6.......... 9. Morehead City Harbor. N.C ...............6.-. 7........ 10. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C............( 6-7 11. Rlollinson Channel, N.C .....................6..-. 8........... 12. Shallotte River, N.C .................... ..............6. -8 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C.......................... 6-8 14. Stumpy Piont Bay, N.C ............................... 6-8 15. W ilm ington Harbor, N.C .................6-.9............ Flood Control 16. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C............... 6-10 16-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake. N.C.........( -10 17. Carolina B3each and Vicinity, N.C................ 0-10 18. Neuse River Basin. N.C................ ... 6-11 18-A. Falls Lake, N.C. ...... ................ 6-1.1 19. Ham let City Lake, N.C ................6.-.12.............. 20. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C ..................(.6.-..1.2 ....... 21. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.-Ileadwaters Area.................... 6-13 22. Wrightsville Beach, N.C ..................... 6-13 23. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C .........6.-.13...... 23-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C..... ..................... 6-14 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects................................. 6-14 Page 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 6-14 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 26. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C .............. 6-14 26-A. John I. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N .C ..................................................... 6-14 26-13. Philpott Lake, Va...................................... 6-15 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................................. 6-15 General Investigations 28. Surveys ............ .................... 6-17 29. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............... 6-17 30. Preconstruction Engineering and D esign ................................................... 6-17 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement............ 6-18 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 6-22 Table 6-C Other Authorized S I Navigation Projects.......................... 6-24 'Fable 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects................................... 6-25 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 6-26 Table 6-F Not Applicable 'fable 6-G Deauthorized Projects......................... 6-27 Table 6-H1 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................... 6-28 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.......................... 6-28 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs .......................... 6-29 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.......................... 6-30 6- IREPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND IIARIBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, HIouse Document 251.89th Congress, 1st session. 'The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (l.D. 25, 89th Congr., 1st sess.). TheAct provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY 93 included chemical control on about 89 river miles of alligator weed (about 20 treatment acres) and .5 acres of hydrilla, biological control of hydrilla at 3 lakes (80 acres ofhydrilla), and monitoring of biological control of hydrilla at 8 sites stocked with triploid grass carp in previous years. All alligator weed control in FY 93 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. All treatment sites are under maintenance control. Control areas include the Scuppernong River Basin, Little River Basin, Pasquotank River Basin, Alligator River Basin, Lumber River Basin and Mackeys Creek. No new alligatorweed treatment areas were added to the program in FY 93; however, a minor extension of the Scuppernong Project was made to include the Crestwell Flood Control System. Three hydrilla biological control sites, Big Lake, Holt Reservoir, and Fred Bond Lake were restocked with triploid grass carp and hydrilla and Lake Crabtree was treated with aquatic herbicide in FY 93. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp to determine the effectiveness of the stocking and predict future control needs continued in FY 93. Program activities also included investigations of aquatic weed problems, in response to requests by the State of North Carolina, which may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 93 are expected to remain.under maintenance control. A biennial treatment schedule in some maintenance level alligatorweed control sites implemented in FY 93 will continue in FY 94. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. Supplemental stocking has been required to achieve control in some sites. Restocking on at least a once every 5-year basis is expected to be required to maintain weed control in these sites. The Aquatic Plant Control Program activities were accomplished at a Federal cost of $31,944. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOIINS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein, a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach 6-2 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, (3 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable chlannol of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Torts Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, I lobucken. and Fairfield bridges was authorized in No- \'emlber 1986(. Estimated Federal cost is $76,578,000 1993). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23. 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93- 251. The 12-fobot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was d(leauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of $3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the "inactive" category on August 14,1992. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface dlue to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane iazel). the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of' North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacemenlt, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to dielete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of Core Creek Bridge was continued at a cost (o$f 4,066,433. Design of Hobucken Bridge was continued at a cost of $486,958. Design of Fairfield Bridge was continued at a cost of$481,731. Work in connection with the completion of Joseph P. Knapp Bridge cost $7,502. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $778,188. Between February 17, and September 2, 1993, contract dredges Stuart, Hampton Roads, and Richmond dredged 714,338 cubic yards from shoals in Inlet Crossings at a cost of $3,046,464. Removal of ordnance in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of the AIWW-Wilmington District through Camp Lejeune, N.C., between Brown and Bear Inlets, cost $2,351. Design cost in connection with future year maintenance dredging was $88,801. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $77,000. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $77. Condition and operation studies cost $405,258. Interim inspection of three remaining bridges cost $21,319. Longterm environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $43,254. Master Plan supplement for Snow's Cut cost $7,045. Three highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $588,234. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $1,653. Environmental clearances for upland disposal areas in conjunction with pipeline dredging cost $4,665. Exploratory drilling of nine disposal sites along the AIWW cost $61,770. Reimbursements for damages to Hobucken Bridge resulted in negative cost of $1,724. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredgeFry removed 164,850 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $354,424. During intermittent periods the sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 10,231 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue inlet at a cost of $89,600. Condition and operation studies cost $17,576. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boatSnell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $2,100. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredgeMerrittremoved 73,338 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $552,963. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dlredge Currituch removed 57,620 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $145,681. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 72,143 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $160,452. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost $4,720. Condition and operation studies cost $25,084. Masonboro Inlet - Condition and operation studies cost $6,206. Preparation of the rehabilitation report for the north jetty at Masonboro Inlet was continued at a cost $122,190. Monitoring at Masonboro Inlet cost $88,304. New River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 22,125 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $116,226. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 258,416 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF rilE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $841.742. During intermittent periods the hopper dredge Currituck removed 46.950 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $116,350. Condition and operation studies cost $28,025. New Tropsail Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt rermhoved 97,486 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $839.183. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 48,870 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $160.901. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 80,314 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $472,229. Between July 3 and August 3, 1993, the contract dredge Stuart removed 80,162 cubic yards from shoals in Banks Channel at a cost of $269,659. An economic feasibility of continuing maintenance of New River Inlet cost $11,739. Condition and operation studies cost $28,521. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in November 1986 except for three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining bridges. The construction contract for Core Creek Bridge was awarded September 27, 1991, with completion scheduled for June 1994. Core Creek Bridge is scheduled to be open to traffic in October 1993. Design of Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges was continued. Total cost of existing project to September 30. 1993, was $180,210,496, of which $56,000.901 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $124,209,595 was for maintenance, including $667.300 in contributed funds, 3. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous p)rojects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island: a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep. 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design for future year dredging cost $2,852. Condition and operation studies cost $3,048. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1993, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $4,056,082 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $4,883,122. 4. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935;August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boatSnell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $263,600. Periodic inspections of locks and dams cost $14,158. Repairs to lock gates of Lock and Dams 1 and 2 cost $876,272. Investigation of slope failure in new rip-rap at Lock and Dam 2 cost $1,995. Repairs to miter gates at William O. Iluske Lock and Dam cost $36,426. Environmental compliance assessments cost $1,129. Condition and operation studies cost $60,454. Operation and Maintenance of three locks and dams cost $256,317. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1993, were $22,384,445 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226.385 public works) was for new work and $18,773,991 for maintenance. 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DIISTRICT 5. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGIIT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2,1945. For details see Annual Report .for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: disposal area stabilization at Barden's Inlet cost $2,364. A project condition survey at Harkers Island march creation site cost $907. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 6. DRUM INLET, N.C. Location. D)rum Inlet is an opening through the barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1.100 feet wide and is about 35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village of Atlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 and 419.) Existing project. The project provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from the gorge in the inlet to the Federally improved channel in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in theAtlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938. (II.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.) The channel from the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for limited reevaluation report cost $89,870. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in February 1972. The feasibility of resuming maintenance is under investigation. 7. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and, (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $8,800. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 1,155 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $7,200. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituch removed 135,535 cubic yards from shoals in ILockwoods Folly River at a cost of $318,993. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt r moved 40,454 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $389,937. Between March 17 and May 1, 1993, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 160,091 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $1,389,967. Archeological investigations in Lockwoods Folly River cost $178. Condition and operations studies cost $28,725. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the 6-5 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THEIIA RMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 8. MIANTEO (SHIALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. L4ocation. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from theAtlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels. 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including nmeans for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel. 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $79,900,000 (1993). The project was authorized by River and IHarborActs ofJune 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments thereifor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equalterms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers: (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals corrmensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $8,318,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $1,125,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $7,950,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $7,000,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Tferminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the modification continued at a cost of $13,526. Monitoring of the terminal groin built by the State of North Carolina cost $5,210. Additional engineering and design work is being accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring dolphins at a cost of $26,662. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 585,690 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,145,406. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 18,485 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $173,242. Between January 28 and May 5, 1993, the contract dredge Richmond removed 404,888 yards from shoals in Old Hlouse Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a Federal cost of $1,165,342. Between August 24 and September 30, 1993, the contract dredge Georgia removed 433,235 cubic yards from shoals in the vicinity of Oregon Inlet Bridge at a cost of $3,286,204. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in Old Hlouse Channel and Channel to Wanchese was $854. Cost in connection with prior year maintenance dredging in the ocean bar was $38,806. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in the vicinity of Oregon Inlet Bridge was $239,266. Expansion of disposal island cost $23,060. Design for construction of a new sand bag disposal area was initiated at a contributed funds cost of $3,546. Repairs to dikes at disposal island were made at a contributed funds cost of $24,792. Environmental dredging studies and monitoring activities in connection with sea turtle research cost $158,953. Project monitoring cost $13,225. Section 933 study for Pea Island and Highway 12 cost $26,963. Condition and operation studies cost $139,276. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is com- 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C,DISTR ICT plete except for the latest modification. (For further detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 9. MOIEHIEAD CITY IIMAIBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 ofAnnual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow- draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A newly authorized modification provides for deepening to 45 feet all portions of the inner harbor that are presently at 40 feet; deepening the entrance channel to 47 feet from the present 42 feet and extending the channel approximately 4,300 feet to deep water; enlarging the turning basin to 1,350 feet from 1,200 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 45 feet from 40 feet; adding three channel wideners on the northernmost port of the ocean bar channel; and Federal assumption of maintenance of the Northwest Leg and the East Leg Extension. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $8,100,000 (1993). The project was authorized by the 1958 River and HarborAct (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, and dredged material disposal areas estimated at $70,000; (b) modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary for the construction of the project estimated at $25,000; (c) provide and maintain bulkheads or wharves or construct other landside facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project estimated at $70,000; (d) provide and maintain depths in the berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with project depths estimated at $335,000 and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement estimated at $51,000 annually; (e) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction estimated at $2,680,000; and (f)re imburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas) estimated at $980,000. Reasonable assurance have been received. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design for the harbor improvements cost $7,570. Project management for the harbor improvements cost $2,293. Additional engineering and design work is being accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring dolphins at a cost of $45,848. Between Decem. ber 5, 1992, and March 20, 1993, the contract dredge Eagle 1 and Mermentau removed 837,573 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,643,052. Mobilization for FY 94 dredging of Brandt Island and the inner harbor cost $1,486,155. This work was accomplished in conjunction with the deepening of Morehead City Harbor. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of the ocean bar was $10,937. Design cost for future year pipeline dredging of the ocean bar cost $652. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $7,088. Ocean dumping monitoring in conjunction with EPAcost $8,825. Environmental and permitting activities associated with sea turtle research cost $105,133. Condition and operation studies cost $54,562. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification.(For further details, seeAnnual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the project to September 30, 1993, was $60,141,085 of which $6,511,432 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $53,629,653 for maintenance, including $1,373,330 contributed funds. 10. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N.C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Htardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14,1876; March 3,1879; August 11, 1888; March 2,1907; July 25,1912; July 3,1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are 6-7 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: during intermittent periods, the U. S. debris bdat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $81,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 11. ROLLINSON CIIANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a nirubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2. 19.15; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for cancelled maintenance dredging cost $2,836. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 12. SIHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report fbr 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of' Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Hiarbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1927 Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of Wharf and (locking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental and archeological investigations for future maintenance dredging of Shallotte River cost $9,376. Condition and operation studies cost $3,550. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 13. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from theAtlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232. Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 'rerminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for cancelled maintenance dredging cost $7,962. Condition and operation studies cost $2,606. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 14. STUMPY POINT BAY, N. C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Worth, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus an irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and HarborAct and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 6-8 WILMINGTON N. C., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part ofthe space along the bulkheads is publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was performed on the project. Contracted funds of $15,000 were returned to the sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 15. WILMINGTON IIARIIBOIt, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington. North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-footdeep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and HarborActs of July 3, 1930; March 2, 19415; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964: under Section 107 ofthe 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982. under See. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. A modification to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet; deepen the 32- foot by 400-foot channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge to 35 feet; widen the 32-foot by 1000- foot by 800-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear River by 50 feet on the west side and deepen to 35 feet; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands fhr industrial access to the river was authorized by the Water Resources DevelopmentAct of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal cost is 823.500.000. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the costsharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources I)Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and dredged material disposal areas including necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at $1,357,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs for dikes presently estimated at $5,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $19,403,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $6,281,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is entirely offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas; and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,475,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $15,000 annually. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 24, 1992, and January 28, 1993, the contract dredge Ouachita removed 749,796 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $805,764. Between November 19, 1992 and January 23, 1993, the contract dredge Cherokee removed 770,473 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a Federal cost of $1,059,159 and 70,330 cubic yards at the State Ports at a contributed funds cost of $75,475. Adjustment in cost for the placement of sand on Bald Head Island resulted in a negative cost in Federal funds of $32,153 and an increase in the City of Bald Head Island's contributed funds of $32,153. Design for future year dredging of the anchorage basin cost $55,757. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of the ocean bar cost $2,012. Repairs to dikes at Eagle Island were performed at a contributed funds cost of $575,709. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boatSnell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $35,200. National Ocean Survey Tidal Datum Determination cost $595. Hilton Wreck damage assessment site documentation cost $4,726. Endangered species study cost $27,815. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $125,864. Environmental and permitting activities for sea turtle research project cost $174,138. Condition and operation studies cost $422,532. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $2,388. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed October 1982 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1993, was $102,279,023 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $88,189,411 was for maintenance, including $6,581,263 contributed funds. The remaining 6-9 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and HiarborAct of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PI)9L9 -662. Flood Control 16. 'CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map.of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87- 639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in 'the comprehensive plan fbllows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and lowards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in April 1992 clue to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 16A. B. EVERET' JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Ilaw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of' Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of' 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for waterquality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $147,100,000 (1993), consisting of $88,714,000 for construction, and $58,386,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30,1963 (I.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed byASA(CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Parkers Creek recreation area modification was initiated at a cost of $35,411. Ebenezer Church recreation area modification was initiated at a cost of $86,064. Crosswinds recreation area modification was initiated at a cost of $30,869. New Hope Overlook recreation area was continued at a cost of $1,447,771. Robeson Creek recreation area was continued at a cost of $372,297. Ebenezer Church recreation area was completed at a cost of $14,422. Seaforth recreation area was completed at a cost of $27,180. Landscaping of Poplar Point recreation area was completed at a cost of $119,084. Landscaping of Ebenezer Church recreation area was completed at-a cost of $117,109. Landscaping of Seaforth recreation area was completed at a cost of $119,084. Total Federal expenditures were $3,041,505, including above items. Status of plans and specs: Rivers End, 98 percent, Rivers Junction, 98 percent, and Wilderness Island O&M roads, 98 percent. Maintenance: Construction of tower access for instrumentation room cost $14,402. Sedimentation resurveys cost $6,662. Replacement of management center septic system cost $30,755. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $1,232. Dam safety training cost $2,521. Normal operation and maintenance cost $888,281. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $80,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are basically complete except for recreation facilities and project operations facilities. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for January 1994. 17. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of' Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the 6-10 SWILMINGTON, N. C.,I)ISTICT Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and Area South of Carolina Beach and provides for construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum (NVGD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD) for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for theArea South, a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130 feet wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD, extending about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limnits of Kure Beach and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 50 years from year of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $198,980,000. The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood ControlAct (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources DevelopmentAct of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; Ic) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An economic reanalysis of the area south of Carolina Beach was continued at a cost of $244,418. An economic reanalysis of the Carolina Beach portion was continued at a cost of $94,552. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completedAugust 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The second increment of renourishment was completed in May 1988. The third increment of renourishment was completed in July 1991. Next renourishment is scheduled for fiscal year 1995. 18. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 18A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dlam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $181,600,000 (1993) consisting of $89,964,000 for construction and $91,636,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility Relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.i Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,601,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $113,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer 6-11 REPORT OF TIHE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,328,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,506,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of theArmy on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Rollingview Swim Beach modification was initiated at a cost of $61,875. Sandling Beach modification was initiated at a cost of $15,935. Wildlife subimpoundments were continued at a cost of $87,098. Holly Point recreation area was continued at a cost of $2,054,177. B. W. Wells and Shinleaf recreation areas were continued at a cost of $1,719,043. Beaverdam Recreation Area was completed at a cost of $289,960. Total Federal expenditures were $5,184,215, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Dam Fix, 90 percent; and MIodifications to Miscellaneous Recreation Areas, 100 percent. Maintenance: Seismologic evaluation report cost S7,339. Dam safety training cost $3,611. Flood gate indication and control system cost $7,606. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $15,620. Normal operation and maintenance cost 8831,147. Maintenance and operations of dams cost $80,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30,1983. All facilities are basically complete except for fish and wildlife facilities, recreation facilities. 0 & M facilities and project modifications due to the water storage shortage. Project completion is scheduled for May 1995. 19. IIAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. The final scope of the project is being negotiated with the project sponsor. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,200,000 (1992). The project was authorized by the Water Resources DevelopmentAct of 1986 (See. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $1,070,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning, engineering, and design was continued at a cost of $52,399. Condition at end of fiscal year. A letter dated October 16, 1992, was received from the sponsor supporting a project smaller in scope than the original project. A schedule was developed and preparation of the Design Memorandum and an Environmental Assessment was begun. 20. LOWER CREEK, LENOIR, N. C. Location. The project is located in northwest North Carolina near the city of Lenoir in Caldwell County and is approximately 60 miles northwest of Charlotte and approximately 60 miles northeast of Asheville. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Lenoir, N. C.) Existing project. The authorized project involves about 1.4 miles of Lower Creek and .4 miles of Zacks Fort Creek of channel widening with a combination of trapezoidal and bench channel design. The improved channel bottom widths range from 50 to 75 feet, roughly doubling the size of the existing channel. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $1,955,000 (1993). The project was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on September 4,1991, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable disposal areas as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the process of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project cost, estimated at $693,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash. The amount to be provided shall include the value of cost of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and facility and utility alterations and relocations necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C. I)ISTRICT and op)erate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of tne Army; at least annually inform affected interests that the channel will not provide complete flood protection and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000. Fully complied with to d(late. Operations and results during fiscal year. New wVork: Real estate planning was continued at a cost of $5,312. Engineering and design was continued at a cost of $1,826. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are substantially complete. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in Novemnber 1991. The City of Lenoir is continuing the rights-of-way acquisition. Contract award is scheduled for September 1994. 21. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, IIEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, VA. (See USGS quadrangle sheet. Roanoke, VA.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about .4 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, VA. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features inelude floodproofing at one location, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 7,200 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges with constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 5-mile recreation trails along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $23,500,000. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99- 662). 6 6.2 Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $8,263,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $2,864,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $11,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations presently estimated at $1,605,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $1,591.000, (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing ON 1970 94,578,237 .< 1970 83,738,277 1970 31,619,000 1970 44,355,000 3a TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete ............ Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete............................... Total, Little Rock District ........................ Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard).................. Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete.... ................ . Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete........................................... Subtotal... ..................................... $119,300,184 10,247,000 814,362,720 2,268,000 12,700,038 2,750,000 $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes:2 Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete............................... ........ $ 46,722,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete ........................... ... ...... 123,170,773 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete......................................... 124,130,747 Subtotal ..................................... . 294,023,849 Total, Tulsa District ......................... . 603,277,401 Total Project Cost 96 percent completeS..........1,419,908,121 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River, except Dam No. 2, is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Details in Tulsa District report. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Lake and State Blue Mountain, AR Canton, OK Elk City, KS (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK 1 2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson, OK1 Keystone, OK' 2 3 Markham Ferry, OK ' Neodesha, KS Nimrod, AR Oologah, OK2 Pensacola, OK 6 Tenkiller Ferry, OK3 Toronto, KS Wister, OK Miles Above River Mouth Petit Jean North Canadian Elk Canadian Fall Grand (Neosho) Arkansas Grand (Neosho) Verdigris Fourche La Fave Verdigris Grand (Neosho) Illinois Verdigris Poteau 74.4 384.3 8.7 27.0 54.2 7.7 538.8 47.4 222.8 62.6 90.2 77.0 12.8 271.5 60.9 Nearest Town Paris, AR Canton, OK Independence, KS Eufaula, OK Fall River, KS Fort Gibson, OK Sand Springs, OK Pryor, OK Neodesha, KS Plainview, AR Claremore, OK Disney, OK Gore, OK Toronto, KS Wister, OK Drainage Height Area of Dam (sq mi) (feet) 488 12,483 634 47,522 585 12,492 74,506 11,533 1,152 680 4,339 10,298 1,610 730 993 Type 115 Earthfill 68 Earthfill 107 Earthfill 114 94 110 121 90 74 103 137 147 197 90 99 Earthfill Earthfill Concretegravity Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Concretegravity Earthfill Concrete arch Earthfill Reservoir Capacity (acre-feet) 257,900 383,300 284,300 3,798,000 256,400 1,284,400 1,836,500 444,500 90,000 336,010 1,519,000 2,197,000 1.230,800 199,700 427,900 Power Development (kilowatts) 90,000 45,000 70,000 100,000 86,400 34,000 Year or Percent Complete 1947 1948 1966 1964 1949 1953 1964 1968 0 1942 1974 1940 1953 1960 1949 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 28-H). Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O'The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. Table 28-I _ ___ __ ___ ____ __ ___;I __ _ _ __ 1_ __ Total Estimated a Cost $ 5,069,974 11,209,834 19,052,990 123,350,791 10,550,873 42,591,298 o> 123,171,173 6,908,756 97,910 4,092,826 46,722,329 52,126 24,017,724 13,896,324 10,501,226 148,041,861 1,419,908,121 1,567,949,982 I- ,.C LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) River Site, Nearest Town DeQueen Lake, Gillham Lake' Dierks Lake, Millwood Lake, Rolling Fork River Cossatot River Saline River Little River 22.8 49.0 56.6 16.0 DeQueen, AR Gillham, AR Dierks, AR Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 28-29 TABLE 28-J Project 1~~1~ C_ _ 1 ------ -- -- '---~-- ---- WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES TABLE 28-K (See Section 34 of text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power To Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estin Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cc Beaver' Bell Foley2 Bull Shoals' Clearwater' Greers Ferry' Norfork' Table Rock' Total White Strawberry White Black Little Red North Fork White 609.0 27.2 418.6 257.4 79.0 4.8 523.8 Eureka Springs, AR Poughkeepsie, AR Mountain Home, AR Piedmont, MO Heber Springs, AR Norfork, AR Branson, MO 1,186 519 6,036 898 1,146 1,806 4,020 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 258 feet concrete-gravity 154 feet earthfill 243 feet concrete-gravity 216 feet concrete-gravity 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 518,000 5,408,000 413,000 1,844,000 1,983,000 3,462.000 15,580,000 112,000 340,000 96,000 80,550 200.,000 828,550 tal nated 3st' $ 52,631,472 93,700,000 96,356,000 22,462,553 55,125,000 111,624,000 55003,307619,,407269,47200 1. For details see individual reports. 2. Inactive-placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. 00 -- TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas andRed RiverBasins. TheDistrict's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas-Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Index, AR. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK 2. OtherAuthorizedNavigationProjects Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs 4b. Area VIII 4c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 5. Birch Lake, OK 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK 8. Copan Lake, OK 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 10. El Dorado Lake, KS 11. Elk City Lake, KS 12. Fall River Lake, KS 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 15. Great Bend, KS 15. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 17. Halstead, KS 18. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 19. Hugo Lake, OK 20. Hulah Lake, OK 29-2 29-2 29-2 29-3 29-3 29-3 29-4 29-4 29-4 29-4 2299--55 29-5: 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-5 29.6 29-6 29-6 29-6 29-6 29-7 29-7 21. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 22. Kaw Lake, OK 23. Lake Kemp, TX 24. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 25. Marion Reservoir, KS 26. Mingo Creek, OK 27. Oologah Lake, OK 28. Optima Lake, OK 29. Parker Lake, OK 30. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 31. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 32. Pine Creek Lake, TX 33. Sardis Lake, OK 34. Skiatook Lake, OK 35. Toronto Lake, KS 86. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK 37. Waurika Lake, OK 38. Wister Lake, OK 39. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 40. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 41. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 42. Emergency Flood Control Activities 43. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 29-1 Page 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-11 !; REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables Broken Bow Lake, OK Eufaula Lake, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK ; Keystone Lake, OK Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK 29-11 29-11 29-11 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-12 29-12 General Investigations ' 52. Surveys 53. Collection and Study of Basic Data 54. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 29-13 29-13 29-13 29-A Cost and Financial Statement 29-B Authorizing Legislation 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 29-D Not Applicable 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29-F Not Applicable 29-G Deauthorized Projects 29-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan 29-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 29-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 29-K General Investigations Navigation L McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas Rivernavigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations during fiscal year. The third highest pool of record (765.01 ft.) was set in May. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 29-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 218.3 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by con- 29-2 44.6 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 29-13 29-20 29-23 29-24 29-25 29-26 29-27 29-27 29-29 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT struction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980 and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. The United States filed suit to seek enforcement of the local cooperation requirements and the issue was mutually resolved by a Consent Decree entered into CIV 89-1507-A in United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, on February 10,1992. The decree was for the City of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the Government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for the Recreation contract and $16,253,644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. Operations and results during fiscal year. Remaining recreation is unscheduled. A record pool elevation of 1021.27 feet was set in May 1993. Routine operation and maintenance continued except for the flood during May 1993. 4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. Provided for studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and the Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see the page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99. 662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 4a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline,TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 4b. AREA VIII Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of two low-flow collection dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities. These two dams (the Bateman Low Flow Dam and the Ross Ranch Low Flow Dam) would be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brine would be pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, would contain the collected brine from this area as well as future collections from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The first ofthe two low-flow dams was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. The second was to be constructed after initial operation of the first to determine the effectiveness of the operation. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of the remaining areas of the Red River Chloride Control project pending transmittal of a report of a favorable finding of the effectiveness of the operation of Area VIII. Public Law 99-662 established a panel to assess the improvement in water quality downstream of Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. A favorable report was submitted by the panel to the Secretary of the 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 assess the improvement in water quality downstream of Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. A favorable report was submitted by the panel to the Secretary of the Army (CW) and to the Public Works Committees of the House and Senate in August 1988. 4c. RED RIVER BASIN CIHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall and King Counties, Texas and Harmon County, Oklahoma, along the Wichita and Red River. Area VI is located on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, Oklahoma; Area VII is on the North Fork of the Wichita River, Cottle County, Texas; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, Texas; Area X is on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, Texas; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of 1 deep-well injection system, 3 brine storage reservoirs, 4 low-flow brine collection dams, 2 well collection facilities, 6 pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. Construction was initiated at Area X, low-flow dam, pump station and access road in 1991. Construction is scheduled to be completed in March 1994. A Limited Reevaluation Report containing a project economic reevaluation was approved in November 1993. Construction funds of $4,000,000 were provided by Congress for FY94. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Develop. ment Act authorized the project at full Federal expense. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $192,600,000 (October 1993 price level base). The contract for Area X was awarded September 27, 1991. 5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construc. tion began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The second highest pool of record (765.01 ft.) was set in May. 6. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10-by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18-by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was about 13 percent complete when construction was delayed because the U.S. Justice Department decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level base). The project was deferred in January 1984. Project land has been made available for low intensity recreation use. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 8. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary ofthe Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued . 9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood operations resulted in a record pool elevation of 1294.32 feet in July. The second highest pool of record (1291.05 ft.) was set in May. 10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a three.- lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A record pool elevation of 1344.99 feet was set in May. 11. ELK CITY LAKE, KS Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third highest pool of record (819.25 ft.) was set in May. 12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third highest pool of record (819.25 ft.) was set in May. 13. FORT SIUPPLY LAKE, OILK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 14. FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK Location. In the northern part of the city of Bixby in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Existing project. The project consists of enlarging both Fry Creeks, diverting Fry Creek 1 into Fry Creek 2 and then diverting the combined creeks into the Arkansas River. The total length of the modified channels would total 4.3 miles, bottom widths of 30 to 225 feet; and depths of 6 to 12 feet. Three bridges will be constructed and 20 acres of land will be acquired for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. Local Cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the city of Bixby, Ok agreed to participate in project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $19,000,000 (October 1993 price level base). Funds provided in FY 93 were used to complete plans and specifications and Project Cooperation Agreement negotiations. 15. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $36,350,000 (October 1993 price level base). Work on Phase III continued. Scheduled project completion will occur in May 1994. 16. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Loal cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third highest pool of record (1133.84 ft.) was set in May. 17. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with clearing and snagging and straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds provided in FY 93 were used to continue construction. Estimated project cost is $11,100,000 (October 1993 price level base). Scheduled completion will occur in May 1995. 18. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement project below thke was never maintained by the sponsor, Joint Drainage District No. 1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, 29-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA. DISTRICT Oklahoma. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982 due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third highest pool of record (423.98 ft.) was set in May. 20. HULAH LAKE, OK.IL Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operationsand results duringfiscalyear. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A major flood operation occurred in May and July. A record pool elevation of 1068.72 feet was set in May. The second highest pool of record (1068.04 ft.) was set in July. 22. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. During May, a major flood control operation resulted in a record pool elevation of 1047.12 feet. The third highest pool of record (1030.55 ft.) was set in July. 23. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. tine operation and maintenance continued. Rou- 24. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) 29-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TUE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long, a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. The plan also includes channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is over 80% complete. Estimated project cost is $48,300,000 (October 1993 price level base). 25. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The lake filled to the top of the conservation pool in December 1992 for the first time since October 1987. A record pool elevation of 1358.80 feet was set in July. The second highest pool of record (1357.60 ft.) was set in May. Except for the flood operation in May through July, routine operation and Smaintenance continued. 26. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. This plan will provide a minimum of 65- year protection in the major damage area. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. On August 26, 1983, the city of Tulsa adopted a Resolution of Assurance to provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the traditional lands, easements, and rightsof- way, whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in the actual financing of construction. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation prior to initiation of federal construction in September 1988. The project is currently 45% complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursement to date for work completed by the City of Tulsa is $10,306,000. Estimated project cost is $143,800,000 (October 1993 price level base). 27. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955 and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third highest pool of record (658.56 ft.) was set in May. 28. OPrIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966 and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 29. PARKER LAKE, OK Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, when constructed, will be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the flood control portion of the project if enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. Operation and results during fiscal year. There was no work in FY 93. Estimated project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price level base). 30. PAT MAIYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 3L PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HtILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. PINE CREEK LAKE, OIL Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 33. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a two-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1;24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Pagel9-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 29-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A record pool elevation of 742.20 feet was set in May. Remaining recreation is unsecheduled. 35 TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 36. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, OK. Location. On the banks of the Arkansas River near Tulsa, Oklahoma. On the left bank, the levee extends from river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, Oklahoma, downstream to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream to river mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion of the business and residential districts in West Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Existing project. The Tulsa and West Tulsa levees were completed by the Tulsa District in 1945. The project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees provide protection from flooding to property valued at approximately $1.0 billion dollars. Many of the pipes that pass under the levee have deteriorated and levee material has eroded into the pipes leaving small cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed an evaluation of the levees in September 1989 which determined that rehabilitation would be required for the levees to operate as designed. Funds to repair the levee were provided in fiscal years 1991 and 1994 by the U.S. Congress. Local cooperation. The LCA was executed in March 1992 and Tulsa County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal sponsors, provided funds of $325,000 in March 1992. Approximately one-half of the project repairs have been completed to date. The sponsors will be required to sign a supplement to the LCA and provide and additional $150,000 as a result of funding and authority included in the FY 94 Energy and Water Appropriations Act by the U.S. Congress. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient pipes was awarded July 30, 1992, and completed in July 1993. Phase II construction is pending execution of a supplement to the Local Cooperation Agreement. 37. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OKTX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 38. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year Per Congressional direction, the pool elevation was held to a minimum of 475.6 feet, NGVD. The current seasonal pool plan was suspended from July 15 to September 30. 39. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 29-E. 29-10 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 40. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table294 for a list of projects inspected in FY 93. Fiscal year cost was $107,166.. 41. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Routine flood control releases were required at several of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir opera-. tions totaled $653,262. 42. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $93,925 and for advance preparation was $121,164. 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 29-J for FY 93 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Con-. gress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14); and Snagging and Clearing. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 44. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. An LCA was executed with the Pittsburg County Board of Commissioners on March 1, 1993. The LCA contains provisions for the county to cost share 25 percent of the Muddy Creek bridge replacement expenses and to operate and maintain the complete project. The Oklahoma Department of Transporation provided $330,000 cash contributions in April 1993. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract for Muddy Creek bridge replacement was awarded in September 1993. Construction completion is scheduled for October 1994. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 46. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War I. Construction resumed in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the construction of hydropower units 5 and 6. Authorization required 100 percent non-Federal financing and will be financed by the Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA). Project design is postponed pending resolution of turbine selection by GRDA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 29-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Operations and results during fiscal y Routine operation and maintenance continued. 47. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 5 near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of T OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the comp] improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Repor 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and project was placed in flood control operatio: September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal y Major flood control operations were required in Ma record pool elevation of 756.49 was set during that m 48. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, a 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison I OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the comp improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Repor 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordir lake system for flood control in the Red River B Construction started in August 1939 and was comp in February 1944. Commercial power generation started in March 1945. Authorized work is corn except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth p units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal y Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DA] AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in LeFlore County, OK. (See R S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) ear. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure 38.8, was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam ulsa, became operational for navigation in December 1970. map, Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. leted t for Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Sthe n in Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. ear. Operations and results during fiscal year. y. A Routine operation and maintenance continued. )nth. 50. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See bout Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Dam, Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was comleted pleted in July 1953. t for iated Local cooperation. Fully complied with. asin. leted Operations and results during fiscal year. L was Routine operation and maintenance continued. plete ower 5L WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. ear. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geologi- S cal Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 336.2, 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the lobert McClellan-KerrArkansas RiverNavigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock 29-12 and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of Muskogee include: A cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 52. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $807,761 which included 8 flood damage prevention studies; 2 special studies, 1 restudy of deferred projects; 2 authorization reports; 1 review of completed projects; miscellaneous activities-special investigations, review of FERC licenses, and intragency water resources development; and coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 53. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $255,828 which includes floodplain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 54. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $1,106,600 which includes three navigation projects and seven local protection projects. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 29-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,19931 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK, (Tulsa District Portion) New Work Approp Cost * 130,936,6382 . 130,936,6382 3,505,573 3,079,178 3,461,500 3,189,400 145,742,712 3,447,239 3,267,423 3,559,308 3,118,662 140,769,353 3. Arcadia Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4. Arkansas-Red River BasinsChloride Control, KS, OK, and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 0 3,131,000 1,000,000 145,748 3,298,138 169,161 312,182 308,900 379,000 344,939 312,533 373,861 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4b. Area VIII, TX New Work Approp Cost 3,788 2,995 1,200 1,979 189,000 -0 3,000 1,987 23,649 . 85,339,289 21,276 85,292,287 320,800 325,308 2,201,782 2,196,365 25,705,208 25,705,068 . 3,533,506 . 3,646,832 - 300,028 - 300,028 570 1,656 177,669 192,317 . 46,682,000 2,204 46,681,960 4c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 5. Birch Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost 638,748 583,300 840,500 632,946 582,900 823,381 New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 987,300 972,741 - 2,550,000 2,450,000 3,000,000 - 756,974 2,649,908 2,945,617 5,100,448 5,052,750 8,000,000 6,352,499 . 13,549,170 . 13,549,296 714,177 651,450 685,000 701,214 676,088 681,326 29-14 Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 653,340 648,355 9,672,540 12,960,223 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sep 30,1993' 6. Candy Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 9,200 18,712 30,400 18,712 33,000 33,431 20209 16,570 12,745 4,927,922 4,927,923 132,270 128,045 7. Canton Lake, OK - 11,209,834 * 10,918,727 Maint Approp 1,436,982 1,595,250 3,825,800 Cost 1,340,993 1,566,840 3,934,771 1,427,000 28,184,626 1,455,190 28,269,372 8 Copan Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost .35,000 .130,000 36,198 10,484 .2,248 873 739,178 759,600 884,000 755,231 812,715 878,128 889,000 846,853 9. Council Grove Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 85,509,751 92,035,258 7,022,779 6,945,931 - 11,810,509 - 11,810,509 Maint Approp Cost 10. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 761,899 756,800 1,017,000 740,635 772,331 850,373 24,332 72,600 86,971 917,500 15,275,143 1,080,975 15,237,560 . 92,505,068 6,763 92,383,114 411,680 448,900 419,500 424,463 456,288 422,471 11. Elk City Lake, KS � 19,052,990 * 19,052,990 652,118 732,200 733,400 671,250 726,541 714,407 765,030 13,653,562 744,015 13,579,473 29-15 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 430,000 430,835 4,637,988 4,635,350 Maint Approp Cost REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section To' in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Se 12. Fall River Lake, KS New Work 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 15. Great Bend, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 17. Halstead, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 720,496 735,620 * * * - 958,400 956,800 872,159 996,806 753,624 751,600 820,457 788,347 5,398,000 5,225,004 525,000 448,000 434,679 399,847 259,000 244,356 4,985,400 4,065,797 231,000 478,600 325,800 351,078 262,000 202,957 10,000 *0 737,500 727,659 4,786,000 5,548,146 2733,000 2,034,480 337,000 326,261 2,828,000 2,808,865 390,000 311,848 tal to p 30,1993' * 10,550,873 * 10,550,873 1.162.000 14,983,691 1,211,715 15,155,742 * 7,724,134 * 7,723,127 758,700 13,755,398 766,6603 13,719,450 90,000 90,000 77,520 77,520 3,444,000 1,569,026 242,000 580,072 352,000 356,411 3,204,000 2,536,569 400,000 -58,019 21,473,400 18,814,356 3,521,000 3,541,152 4,626,270 4,626,270 8,531,786 8,506,199 7,378,000 6,607,974 800,000 253,829 * 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 29-16 m TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,1993' 601,250 611,300 683,000 628,135 680,453 665,157 673,130 11,365,603 692,616 11,461,203 19. Hugo Lake, OK - 41,216,442 - 41,180,456 1,219,694 1,250,500 1,p245,018 1,323,840 1,410,500 1,607,000 22,234,544 1,307,664 1,684,980 22,129,549 20. Hulah Lake, OK - 11,388,150 - 11,182,433 404,921 389,700 306,000 454,003 385,644 317,347 343,100 12,539,000 343,974 12,509,163 21. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 22. Kaw Lake, OK 135,718 135,718 . -. 28,151,515 * * 28,151,515 1,078,323 961,800 1,022,000 1,020,280 22,884,080 1,050,865 1,049,933 1,021,250 1,014,293 22,983,432 New Work Approp- Cost - 109,430,750 - 109,429,274 1,562,033 1,515,600 1,775,200 1,600,000 1,488,022 1,703,701 1,724,787 1,669,082 23. Lake Kemp, TX 24. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (Federal) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 7,637,702 S 7,637,702 122,278 174,700 137,000 110,666 183,575 125,281 12,071,000 3,594,000 -349,000 10,009,893 4,597,273 890,417 29-17 184,720 188,149 3,074,000 1,682,488 Heyburn Lake (cont'd) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 3,456,700 3,748,348 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cos 25,775,923 25,738,887 2,605,612 2,592,020 27,654,000 25,960,341 . 0 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Table 29-A (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,1993' Lake Wichita (cont'd) (Contrib. Funds) 25. Marion Reservoir, KS COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 1,700,000 1,060,000 2,039,197 899,398 2,000,000 370,000 . 13,420,817 . 13,420,817 894,872 939,900 907,600 958,866 949,944 907,012 26. Mingo Creek, OK (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Oologah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 5,090,000 6,221,000 12,183,000 5,395,000 35,860,000 7,904,520 6,540,605 12,359,164 3,125,564 32,644,278 1,388,000 881,245 1,100,000 1,800,000 899,898 410,147 778,055 6,288,000 4,841,997 46,722,3293 46,721,5563 1,496,487 1,485,800 1,427,500 1,270,804 1,699,766 1,423,709 1,546,000 25,307,213 1,558,987 25,284,867 28. Optima Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 29. Parker Lake, OK 30. Pat Mayse Lake, TX New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 443,728 454,700 429,500 441,111 462,093 427,111 40,871 2,238 2,258 812,641 906,800 939,400 779,710 903,262 965,137 1,10010,1,00000,0000o 5,760,000 4,759,295 Maint Approp Cost 949.000 959,555 15,701,718 15,665,374 Maint Approp Cost 488,700 468,849 47,173,438 47,173,438 6,575,050 6,587,777 522,000 509,009 9,310,661 9,310,661 14,631,150 14,609,942 813,700 817,264 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,1993' 31. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost - 16,879,166 - 16,879,166 919,818 804,600 937,000 851,358 870,861 925,070 32. Pine Creek Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost * 20,628,049 170 32 20,627,879 924,395 1,051,900 1,162,600 1,112,520 15,308,073 933,647 1,054,204 1,137,726 1,138,385 15,264,304 33. Sardis Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 1,075,000 -169,000 2,626,250 226,259 4,068 - 68,799,479 5,562 68,622,491 Maint Approp Cost 34. Skiatook Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 35. Toronto Lake, KS 36. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 882,840 832,700 926,000 853,845 874,352 862,618 20,000 130,038 471 141 1,191,638 1,127,000 1,256,000 1,215,888 1,160,717 1,076,141 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 277,303 239,700 263,000 273,670 240,867 264,871 - 135,000 840,000 - 65,703 153,044 325.000 - 29-19 Maint Approp Cost 846,000 874,204 9,208,618 9.219,471 Maint Approp Cost 930,100 949,340 7,774,490 7,717,466 106,201,282 106,268,739 7,623,738 7,522,966 13,896,324 13,896,324 6,385,216 6,383,092 975,000 716,804 325.000 100,00037. 858,800 989,018 319,110 319,746 498,057 100,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,1993' - 2,911,000 -323,752 - 2,911,338 -313,970 Maint Approp 1,129,587 1,233,400 1,235,600 Cost 1,141,034 1,210,457 1,261,658 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 44. Broken Bow Lake, OK Major Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 45. Eufaula Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost Maint Approp Cost 733,693 715,100 720,000 689,495 772,332 716,466 6,195,529 3,996,000 5,756,325 � 4,095,199 270,394 - 69,740,298 -8,340 69,731,529 1,206,410 13,628,963 1,224,948 12,622,731 - 10,501,226 ,* 10,501,226 781,000 793,560 84,439 1,644,380 1,740,400 1,752,200 2,171,200 1,623,572 1,671,878 1,860,381 2,161,510 19,824 39,014 18,617 670,000 29,905 330,000 3,861,000 4,366,794 4,038,400 3,573,473 4,121,612 4,385,849 3,923,005 3,795,793 13,813,653 13,800,134 11,131,529 11,129,041 41,222,692 41,222,692 25,824,721 25,790,882 124,020,747' 123,108,834' 330,000 66,720,033 63,599,696 46. Fort Gibson Lake, OK * 42,591,2986 * 43,497,7916 2,989,814 3,055,000 3,734,000 3,542,700 58,890,702 3,052,430 3,087,214 3,533,649 3,801,859 60,253,788 29-20 New Work Approp Cost 37. Waurika Lake, OK 38. Wister Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30,1993' 47. Keystone Lake, OK - 123,171,1736 - 123,170,6756 2,745,433 2,680,100 3,022,685 3,109,000 51,334,685 2,752,389 2,742,665 3,050,124 2,977,460 51,266,437 48. Lake Texoma New Work (Denison Dam),OK and TX Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 68,1680,%07 * 68,0l909W7 7,078,815 5,252,000 6,265,000 5,434,700 105,831,686 5,667,880 6,557,106 6,303,084 5,503,214 105,736,724 49. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 46,237 46,237 * 94,578,237 - 94,578,237 4,233,112 2,811,100 2,900,500 3,019,520 55,543,053 3,612,433 3,288,901 3,104,279 3,004,368 55,136,204 50. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK - 24,017,720 - 24,057,718* 2,837,232 2,757,300 3,005,000 3,064,000 50,865,147 2,906,764 2,835,767 2,965,843 3,114,736 50,866,225 51. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 29-M of t Annual Report. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,7' 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49, Works acceleration funds. 2,369,690 2,369,690 . 86,107,967 . 86,108,391 2,152,027 2,382,700 2,809,000 2,457,500 49,555,991 1,964,705 2,534,989 2,875,685 2,456,339 49,652,850 98.8 dated, 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. the FY 85 7. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief Funds. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. special funds. 9. The cost for Grand Lake O' the Cherokees has been added to 28 special funds. amount reported in paragraph 41, Scheduling Reservoir 581 Public Operations. 29-21 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost M REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section In Text 1. 3. 4. 4a. 4b.&4c. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Documents HD 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94.587 Date of Authorizing Act July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 mmwmmmmmmm mw Project and Work Authorized McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X P Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE FRY CREEKS GREAT BEND GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK SD 87-107 L 89-789, SD 110 PL 91.611 PL 99-662 HD 87-563 HD 87.563 HD 75.569 HD 87.563 HD 80-.442 HD 89.232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99.662 PL 99-662 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 TULSA. OKIAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section In Text 19. Project and Work Authorized HUGO LAKE Documents HD 79-602 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. -- Date of Authorizing Act July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 December 30, 1963 June 28, 1938 July 30, 1983 .. HULAH LAKE HD 74-308 JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 85-327 KAW LAKE HD 87-143 LAKE KEMP HD 87-144 LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK PL 99-662 MARION RESERVOIR HD 80.442 Authorized name change PL 101-253 MINGO CREEK PL 99-662 OOLOGAH LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session OPTIMA LAKE HD 74.308 PARKER LAKE PL 99-662 PAT MAYSE LAKE HD 88-71 PEARSON.SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE HD 87-472 Authorized name change PL 95-265 PINE CREEK LAKE HD 85-170 SARDIS LAKE SD 87-145 Authorized name change PL 97-88 SKIATOOK LAKE HD 87.563 TORONTO LAKE HD 76-440 PL 77.228 TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK PL 77.228 WAURIKA LAKE SD 88-33 PL 88-253 WISTER LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session Changed conservation pool PL 98-63 elevation 29-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 44. July 3, 1958 BROKEN BOW LAKE HD 85-170 October 23, 1962 SD 87-137 45. July 24, 1946 EUFAULA LAKE HD 79-758 July 16,1984 Authorized Piney Creek and PL 98-360 Muddy Creek bridge replacement November 17, 1986 Authorized cost sharing L9I-662 46. August 18, 1941 FORT GIBSON LAKE HD 76-107 July 24, 1946 Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan PL 76-228 for the Arkansas River Basin November 17, 1986 Added hydropower units 5 & 6 PL 99-662 47. May 17, 1950 KEYSTONE LAKE SD 81.07 48. LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) June 28, 1938 Flood control and power HD 75-541 October 17, 1940 Navigation and regulating flows PL 76.868 Sepember 30, 1944 Authorized name PL 78-454 August 14, 1953 Water supply PL 83.273 November 17, 1986 Recreation PL 99-662 49. July 24, 1946 ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND HID 79.758 DAM AND RESERVOIR July 8, 1963 Authorized name change PL 88-62 50. June 28, 1938 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. June 24, 1946 Power HD 79-758 51. July 24, 1946 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 Table 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1993 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive Navigation Project Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 OK and AR Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 to Mouth of Washita River 29-24 TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30.1993 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS', " 1938 - 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX8 1984 1,701,670 - Boswell Lake, OKI 1952 - - Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK' 1970 261,448 - Crutcho Creek LPP, OK' 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS' - Enid LPP, OK' 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, 1975 1,741,000 - Tulsa, OK , 4 Florence LPP, KS' 1965 369,782 - Hutchinson LPP, KS' 1956 3,497,718 - lola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 - Jenks LPP, OK' 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK' 308,041 - Lamrned LPP, KS2' Lukfata Lake, OK 1983 1,424,685 - Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX*6 Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512 - Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, 1953 222,105 - OK and TX' Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 - Sand Lake, OKI 1963 . Shidler Lake, OKI 1983 568,191 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK' 1954 2,785,070 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OKI 1975 144,853 Tuskahoma Lake, OK 1963 . . West Branch Chisholhn Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 - Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 Winfield LPP, KS' , ' 1937 . . LPP -Local Protection Project: 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. TABLE 29-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last .... . .. ... Full Report Day Federal Contribu See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17, 1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 392,361 0 Public Law 99.662 TABLE 29-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile' Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and .Verdigris and N/As Fort Smith, AR, Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 39 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year South Deer Creek,OK Dodge City, KS Florence, KS Hutchinson, KS Iola, KS Larned, KS Marion, KS Mingo Creek, Audubon Creek Mingo Creek, 36th Street North Sand Creek, City of Newton, KS Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK Flat Rock/Valley View Cks, OK Haikey Creek, OK Jenks, OK Joe Creek, OK Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK Enid Diversion Channel, OK Oklahoma City Floodway, OK Park City, KS West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS Wichita/Valley Center Inspection Date October 1992 November 1992 November 1992 May 1993 December 1992 November 1992 November 1992 October 1992 October 1992 November 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 October 1992 December 1992 December 1992 March 1993 June 1993 June 1993 June 1993 TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 43 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK Branch Creek, Del City, OK Chickasha, OK Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS Liberal KS Oil Branch Creek, Heavener, OK Pole Creek, Poteau, OK Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Arkansas River,Sand Springs, OK Camp Facility, Red River, Telephone, TX Chikaskia River, Ft Oakland, OK City Dam, Little Caney River, KS 765 1,668 924 47,681 7,029 14,699 2,923 90 74,444 15.439 165,662 14,510 6,613 9,077 3,467 29-27 I _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK (Continued) UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost County Road (Sec. 2), Deer Creek, KS 1,135 County Bridge, Washita River, Garvin County, OK 6,549 County Road, Washita River, Caddo County, OK 18,294 Cow Creek, Comache, OK 4,776 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS 12,720 Kiowa Tribe Housing Developement, Andarko, OK 11,247 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK 23,621 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK 11,165 North Canadian River, Canadian County, OK 13,126 Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River 5,198 Sewage Lagoons, Minnehaha Creek, Canton, OK 14,852 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS4868 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 171,218 SNAGGING AND CLEARING Boggy Creek, Bryan County, OK 5,092 Little Deep Fork Creek, OK TOTAL SNAGGING AND CLEARING 8,390 TABLE 29-K .GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 52, 53, and 54 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Bowie County Levee, TX 223,652 Crutcho Creek, OK 6 Grand Neosho River Basin, KS and OK 840 Kaw Dam to Keystone Lake 45 Keystone Dam to Tulsa, Arkansas River, OK 697 Lake Texoma, OK and TX 4,279 North Canadian River, OK 140,684 Pecan Bayou, TX 31,642 Verdigris River Basin, KS and OK 284 Special Studies Environmental Services Partners 4,870 Fed Strategy America Infrastructure 976 Authorization Reports Arkansas River and Tributaries, South Central Southeast Areas, OK 335 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA and OK 381 Review of Authorized Projects Restudy of Deferred Projects Lukfata Lake, OK 46 Review of Completed Projects 29-28 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (See Sections 52,53, and 54 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identificatior'Name Cost Recon Phase of Study Wister, OK 187,681 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations 60,427 Review of FERC Licenses 2,245 Intragency Water Resources Development 18,238 North American Water Fowl Management 1,079 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service 8,970 Coordinate Studies with Soil Conservation Service 47 Bureau of Reclamation 426 Planning Assistance to States . Oklahoma, Mangum Lake 69,959 Planning Assistance to States - Negotiation Funds 11,078 Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma, Deep Fork River 3,886 Planning Assistance to States . Oklahoma City, OK 34987 TOTAL SURVEYS 807,760 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Claremore OK, FW/P 766 Flood Plain Management Services 58,827 Quick Responses 9,862 Chickasha, OK 10,203 Moore, OK 8,881 Sterling, KS 22,997 Wichita, KS -275 Shawnee, OK 18,554 Skiatook, OK 529 Technical Services General 124,165 Wagoner County, CO 456 Hydrologic Studies Storm Studies 863 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 255,828 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Projects Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks 4,611 Red River Waterway to Denison Dam, TX 14,856 Red River Waterway, Bowie County Levee 37 Flood Control Projects Local Protection Arkansas City, KS 321,266 Great Bend, KS 2,666 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 201,968 McGrath Creek, TX 277,866 Mingo Creek, OK (CP&E) 4,818 Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS 13,177 Winfield, KS 265 335 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 1,106,600 29-29 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Trinity River Project, TX. Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX....... 3. Bardwell Lake, TX .... 4. Belton Lake, TX ........ 5. Benbrook Lake, TX ..... 6. Canyon Lake, TX .... .. Page Flood Control (Cont) 30-2 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir O perations............................. 27. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .... 30-3 28. Work Under Special Authorization ......... 30-3 30-3 30-4 30-4 7. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX. ........... 30-4 8. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O'The Pines, TX .................... 30-5 9. Grapevine Lake, TX ...................... 30-6 10. Hords Creek Lake, TX ............ ........ 30-6 11. Joe Pool Lake, TX................ .... .. 30-6 12. Lavon Lake, TX...... .................... . 30-7 13. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX........ ......... .30-7 14. Lewisville Dam, TX .......... ..... .... ... 30-7 15. Navarro Mills Lake, TX................... 30-7 16. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX ...... ........ .30-8 17. Proctor Lake, TX......................... 30-8 18. Ray Roberts Lake, TX ..................... 30-8 19. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ...... 30-9 20. San Gabriel River, TX ................... .. 30-9 21. Somerville Lake, TX..................... 30-10 22. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............... 30-10 23. W aco Lake, TX ......................... 30-10 24. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ........ 30-10 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... 30-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX .... 30. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ...... 31. Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX .............. 32. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ............... 33. W hitney Lake, TX....................... General Investigations 34. Surveys ............................. 35. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.. 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... Page 30-11 30-11 30-11 30-11 30-11 30-12 30-12 30-12 .. 30-12 . 30-12 . 30-13 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... .30-15 Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 30-19 Table 30-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........................ 30-22 Table 30-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. 30-22 Table 30-E Work Under Special Authorization ................... 30-23 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,060,000,000 including $44,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty and Tennessee Colony Lake have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction Engineering and Design stage and is described in Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). 30-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $169,996 toward principal and $37,028 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $18,067,000. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $943,037 toward principal and $1,194,243 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $26,774,300. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by .Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,470,859 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,777,302 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $512,223,300. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $403,555 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $143,478 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $19,218 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 are estimated at $2,397,283,800. 6. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 6,070 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $2,426,880 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,479,125 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $147,781,500. 7. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper D)am is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 79 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 99 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 100 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an 30-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS I)ISTRICT Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 48.2 miles of levee, and the acquisition of 24,724 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. Public Law 101-101, H. R. 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1993 base price) is $146,000,000, non-Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $55,500,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, City of Irving) will utilize water impounded for present and future water supply. The total cost allocated to water supply to be reimbursed is $55,500,000. North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 36.859 percent of the water supply storage for future use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the water supply storage. To date $90,819 has been paid. Under the contract SRMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $10,341 has been paid. The City of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply storage. To date $237,509 has been paid. Under the contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $40,370 has been paid. The Texas Parks and Wildlife and the Corps of Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife will be responsible for 100 percent of the O&M of two state parks that are being constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts for wildlife conservation and management the State will be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operations, maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors and the Government. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1993 the State of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department awarded recreation contracts. Other contracts awarded during the year were White Oak Creek Wetlands Mitigation Area, Ducks Boxes; and Spillway Service Road and Turnaround. Cooper Lake and Channels is approximately 86 percent complete overall. Major items completed through FY 1993 are Relocations of Railroads, 100 percent; Channels and Canals, 100 percent; Levees and Floodwalls, 100 percent; and Lands and Damages, 99 percent. Land Acquisition, Engineering and Design and construction continues. Deliberate Impoundment began 29 September 1991 and project completion is scheduled for September 1995. Benefits accrued to Cooper Lake and Channels project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 are estimated at $1,816,600. 8. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $32,760,600. 9. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed FY 1990. The improvements provided for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet'of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $123,868 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $121,231, Dallas $611,950, and Grapevine $211,522. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation, and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $4,312,292,600. 10. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hlords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to HIords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $5,024,500. 11. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dlam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 22,360 feet, including 50-foot type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acrefeet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $226,890,000 (Oct. 1, 1993, base price) including $11,350,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River Basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $57,240,000 for water supply and $19,840,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $76,790,000 exclusive of interest. To date $43,200 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $4,148 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1993 is approximately 99 percent complete overall. All major items are complete thru FY 1993 except for the State Park recreation and the Penn Site restoration. Deliberate Impoundment began January 1986. Project completion is scheduled for September 1994. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $403,693,200. 30-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 12. LAVON LAKE, rTX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of pr(oject was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $3,911,772. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $798,059. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $324,016,000. 13. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $3,711,548 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,825,004. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 14. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 2,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $3,598,897 and Denison $151,208. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $5,503,053,500. 15. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000, including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $1,050,046 for water supply and $1,138,929 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $100,080,600. 16. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $16,289,900. 17. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $464,500 for water supply and $446,327 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $52,900,200. 18. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. The Water Resource Development Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $312,300,000 (Oct. 1, 1993, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Hydropower: At the request of the City of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 1,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $4,553,031 and the city of Denton has paid $1,597,533 toward principal. Dallas has paid $137,094 and Denton has paid $48,167 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 98 percent complete overall. Through FY 1993 about 94 percent of the land acquisition, the road and utility relocations and the embankment, spillway and outlet works have been completed. Major work items remaining to be completed are boundary delineation at Lewisville Lake, flood damage repairs, seepage control, recreational facilities, and the Greenbelt. Deliberate Impoundment began 30 June 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was 30 November 1988. The project is scheduled to be completed in July 1997. Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $2,039,329,100. 30-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 19. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels. The San Pedro Creek tunnel would be 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel would be 16,360 feet in length, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $140,700,000 (Oct. 1, 1993, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $65,100,000 which includes $3,700,000 cash contributions and $61,400,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $205,800,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 93 percent complete. The Federal portion of the project is scheduled to be completed in June 1996. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $3,444,000 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1993 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. Benefits accrued '. San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1993 were $369,591,400. 20. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Darn at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was placed on inactive status and would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 1997 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $39,637,400. 21. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $1,736,098 to date. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $93,807,000. 22. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $2,204,426. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,019,452. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1993 is $58,170,200. 23. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $2,316,274. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,061,967 and the City has paid $164,129. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $277,281,400. 24. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the City has paid $635,312. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $73,426,100. 30-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $101,558. Total costs to September 30, 1993 were $1,084,497. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1993 were $256,108,000 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1993 were $418,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $76,162. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 28. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $111,249 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project was economically feasible. The hydropower facilities include a 7,400 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,700 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment is located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel. The plant is operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The project produces an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non-Federal cost is $18,900,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operation during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $4,400,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $174,432. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $153,098. 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $439,893,200. 31. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Location. For location of completed dam see Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The existing 2200-foot wide uncontrolled spillway is constructed through erodible loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined spillways constructed through less erodible material, the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would experience severe erosion damage and probably breach during passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency (25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The modification of the spillway consists of constructing a new reinforced concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel at or near the existing spillway structure. The proposed weir would have a width of 640 feet, an overall length of 433 feet, an outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest elevation of 176.0 feet NGVD. Estimated Federal cost for the spillway modification is $42,900,000 (Oct. 1, 1993, base price) and $1,110,000 is to be reimbursed by hydropower sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design continues. 32. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 33. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the authority has paid $243,475. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1993 were $676,459,900. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $844,883 for flood damage prevention studies; $106,716 for coordination with other agencies; $235,935 for review of authorized projects; $2,574 for Environmental Services Partnerships; $98,090 for miscellaneous activities; and $0 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,288,198. 35. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX: Beals Creek is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas. The project includes local protection features including channel improvement and relocations. The channel will be a trapezoidal grass-lined channel with an average depth of about 11 feet and a bottom width of 20 feet. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $884,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1988. Fiscal year costs were $74,542. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX: Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $4,824. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1991. Fiscal year costs were $670,899. FIVE MILE CREEK, DALLAS, TX: Five Mile Creek is located in the southwestern portion of Dallas County, entering the Trinity River just north of Hutchins, Texas. The plan consists of enlarging the channel in the middle portion of the watershed, possible channelization of some major tributaries, and detention ponds in the upper portion of the watershed. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,600,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $-10,872. 30-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT SHOAL CREEK (HANCOCK CREEK), AUSTIN, TX: Hancock Creek, a tributary to Shoal Creek, Austin, Texas, flows through a highly urbanized area of Austin. The authorized project will consist of approximately 4,700 feet of grass-lined channel, concrete-lined channel, and selective clearing along Hancock Creek from Houston Street to its confluence with Shoal Creek with bottom widths varying between 25 and 50 feet. The project will also include alteration to or replacement of three highway bridges, construction of a 10-foot by 10-foot box culvert to divert flows around a shopping center, relocation of utility lines, and acquisition of approximately 4 acres of lands and easements for construction purposes. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $780,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1992. Fiscal year costs were $323,828. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $261,358. Fiscal year costs were $14,368 for hydrologic studies. 30-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 This page intentionally left blank. 30-14 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 19931" 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Canyon Lake, TX 7. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (Contributed Funds) 8. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 9. Grapevine Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. APprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 22,574,865 - 22,574,865 520,507 516,000 544,000 551,000 438,501 534,383 600,262 537,052 45,506,300 45,506,300 4,733,109 4,691,846 - - - - 10,934,505 -- - - 10,934,505 1,632,675 1,156,938 1,964,000 1,205,500 20,621,32218 1,168,319 1,601,315 1,977,376 1,181,948 19,404,14618 - - - - 16,960,549 - - - - 16,960,5491 2,533,345 1,791,000 2,845,000 2,741,000 30,429,10918 1,638,622 2,638,460 2,398,521 3,202,582 30,273,47418 - - - - 13,130,463 - - - - 13,069,9912 2,262,948 1,581,950 1,495,000 1,439,000 26,855,33518 1,505,796 1,002,687 1,557,277 1,413,343 25,392,68418 - - - - 19,088,524 -3 - - - - 19,088,524 1,306,478 1,292,000 1,544,000 1,438,000 20,825,50418 1,266,674 1,352,930 1,397,919 1,557,630 20,514,63218 23,265,000 22,945,751 12,846,000 9,102,000 10,473,000 127,395,887 13,279,210 11,132,249 9,518,230 123,339,068 - - - 227,000 - - - 227,000 - 5,000 541,000 719,000 - - 520,741 704,853 1,265,000 1,225,594 - - - - 14,175,1974 - - - - 14,175,19756 2,780,974 2,180,998 2,276,000 2,072,000 34,762,02518 2,073,792 2,838,139 2,257,701 2,066,249 34,669,89218 512 2,624,949 1,734,685 - - - 21,317,790 - - - 21,317,790 1,715,000 1,665,600 1,720,800 31,583,73918 2,621,486 1,625,900 1,712,282 31,477,502 ' 18 30-15 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 199317 10. Hords Creek Lake, TX 11. Joe Pool Lake, TX 12. Lavon Lake, TX 13. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 14. Lewisville Dam, TX 15. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 16. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 17. Proctor Lake, TX 18. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 29. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 732,748 809,000 928,000 707,564 778,039 954,698 2,087,000 2,496,541 496,620 480,658 3,058,296 1,934,149 230,000 925,867 668,988 669,718 2,079,000 3,182,751 426,000 595,234 555,000 557,343 - 2,731,0898 - 2,731,089 843,000 14,687,217 ' 836,038 14,566,160 ' 894,000 641,036 612,000 588,334 188,808,000 188,459,181 3,774,608 3,716,616 - - 12,864,796 - - 12,864,796 2,721,000 2,453,000 35,268,9368 2,138,896 3,090,418 35,232,11418 - 69,796,862 - 69,796,862 - - - - 25,333,988 - - - - 25,333,9889 4,814,960 3,099,300 2,950,600 2,099,500 46,554,58518 3,251,393 4,507,035 2,889,361 2,126,866 43,819,28518 1,423,654 981,959 1,283,500 1,223,316 1,187,582 1,246,410 907,035 885,734 - 9,846,759 - 9,846,75911 1,183,100 19,494,01318 1,255,897 19,455,15418 - - - 16,027,467 - - - 16,027,467 1,495,000 1,258,000 1,129,000 17,823,92518 1,540,284 1,230,446 1,109,503 17,732,77218 - - - - 14,469,585 - - - - 14,469,585 2,111,287 1,193,998 1,369,000 1,944,000 21,140,93918 1,221,199 2,034,878 1,294,068 1,808,845 20,643,31118 16,427,000 18,602,293 581,002 523,614 104,000 157,592 7,964,000 9,360,490 555,000 547,667 50,000 123,828 4,534,000 5,900,903 601,000 635,492 1,255 4,117,000 4,328,933 697,000 712,744 295,871,700 294,529,447 3,239,402 3,211,570 - 18,672,000 - 18,628,463 30-16 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 93 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993" 30. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX 31. Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX 19. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 21. Somerville Lake, TX 22. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 32. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 23. Waco Lake, TX 33. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 60,670,957 - - - - 60,670,95712 2,201,218 2,733,000 4,553,279 3,565,000 52,655,53318 1,956,530 2,919,386 4,502,139 3,051,502 51,650,073 ' 200,000 400,000 884,000 1,304,000 101,856 177,798 1,049,007 1,331,960 14,698,000 16,386,648 5,713,000 15,000,000 15,692,809 16,762,775 - 668,955 - 668,955 5,791,000 5,772,925 805,621 512,911 2,788,000 2,660,621 129,967,048 129,418,871 3,238,786 2,946,076 - 101,796,100 - 101,796,100 1,116,673 1,045,321 1,127,269 1,096,518 998,000 1,091,454 1,096,000 1,094,698 1,774,000 1,751,570 1,141,000 1,134,548 1,247,000 1,249,429 1,134,000 1,158,318 14,433,95118 14,381,68018 13,248,82318 13,201,91218 - - - - 27,790,438 - - - - 27,790,436 1,647,480 2,063,000 2,127,500 1,966,800 31,571,13818 1,497,359 2,170,664 2,006,947 2,114,277 29,021,35418 - - - - 20,522,08413 - - - - 20,522,084 1,269,499 1,192,000 1,352,000 1,616,000 19,534,54718 1,083,861 1,334,128 1,278,094 1,654,630 19,391,17918 - - - - 6,602,737 - - - - 6,602,73714 1,578,368 1,249,000 1,055,621 1,229,000 19,247,45718 1,129,621 1,679,080 1,049,431 1,141,331 19,048,31218 - - - - 49,521,12115 - - - - 49,521,121 2,512,419 1,611,990 1,815,000 1,980,000 30,213,51418 1,840,041 2,249,353 1,813,450 2,037,952 30,082,79418 - - - - 42,952,938 - - - - 42,952,93816 4,717,063 3,687,999 2,897,000 2,923,000 51,505,66418 3,551,733 4,592,861 3,158,294 2,863,593 51,026,40618 30-17 REPORT OF TIHE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 24. Wright Patman Darn New Work: and Lake, TX Approp. - - - - 35,731,626 Cost - - - - 35,731,626 Maint. Approp. 1,860,546 1,224,885 1,577,000 1,779,000 32,570,9451" Cost 1,390,881 1,460,554 1,728,512 1,847,306 32,497,317'1 'Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts., 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 3 Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. s Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5 Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7 Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 -which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. ' Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 4 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. fu Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. " Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98- 8, dated March 24, 1983). S 'I Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 30-18 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 13, 1968 3. Mar. 31, 1960 4. Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 5. Mar. 2, 1945 6. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 7. Aug. 3, 1955 8. Jul. 24, 1946 9. Mar. 2, 1945 10. Aug. 18, 1941 11. Oct. 27, 1965 12. Mar. 2, 1945 13. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of'a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on iords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. I. Doc 535. 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 30-19 TABLE 30-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 14. Mar. 2, 194 15. Sep. 3, 195 Dec. 31, 19 16. Aug. 18, 19 17. Sep. 3, 195 18. Oct. 27, 19( 30. Mar. 2, 194 31. Mar. 2, 194 19. Sep. 3, 195 20. Sep. 3, 195 Jan. 3, 197 21. Sep. 3, 195 22. Sep. 3, 195 32. Mar. 2, 194 29. Mar. 2, 194 15 4 70 41 LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a (ldam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, 'IX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX 4 Construction of a d(lam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX 65 Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, "TX t5 Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX 15 Modification of the spillway and embankment. SAN ANTONIO CHLANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX 4 Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX 4 Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on 5 the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, ITX 4 Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX. 4 Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHIAGEN LAKE, TX 15 Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX 15 Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. H. l)oc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. I. I)oc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 30-20 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of 1st Sess., and Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; 2nd Sess. a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX 23. Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and 2nd Sess. Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 33. Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., miles southwest of Hlillsboro, Texas. Raise the power 1st Sess. pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 24. Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 30-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 30-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1993 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Modification, TX' 1988 - Big Fossil Creek, TX' 1969 - Big Sandy Lake, TX4 1986 - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - Boggy Creek, Austin, TX1 1992 - Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX . - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX4 1979 - Dam "A" Lake, TX5 1987 - Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX" 1983 - Elm Fork Floodway, TX5 1987 - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX 1971 - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' 1971 - Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' 1987 Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)' 1989 - Greenville, TX' 1983 - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX 1983 - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX - Millican, TX2 1988 - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX - - Roanoak Lake, TX5 1979 - Rockland Lake, TX5 1988 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TXI 1969 - Zacate Creek Channel, TX' 1983 - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX' 1986 - - Completed. . 4Recommended for Deauthorization 2Inactive 'Deauthorized Deferred INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-D (See Section 26 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek ................................ ............................... Apr. 1, 1993 Boggy Creek, Austin...................... ............................ ................. Nov.4, 1993 Calloway Branch, Hurst.......................................................... Aug. 24, 1993 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene ...... ........ .. .................... Jun. 16, 1993 Dallas Floodway .................... Apr 20, 1993 East Fork...................................................................... Jun. 24, 1991 Fort Worth Floodway .................. ......... . ................................... Oct. 6, 1993 Grand Prairie Landfill ........................ ....... .... ............. Mar. 5, 1993 Grand Prairie Meyers Road..................................................................... Mar. 5, 1993 Long Branch, Greenville.............................................................. Apr. 28, 1993 Lorean Branch, Hurst.................................Aug. 24, 1993 Munday ............................................................................ Jun. 2, 1993 Park Row Bridge, Arlington................... ........... ........ ....................... Dec. 1, 1993 Pleasanton........................................................................Nov. 18, 1993 Poteet..................... ....................................................... Nov. 18, 1993 San Antonio Floodway ............... ................ ........... ...................... Nov. 15, 1993 Walnut Creek, Seguin................................................................ Nov. 19, 1993 Wheeler Creek, Gainsville .. ............................................................. Apr. 23, 1993 Zacate Creek, Laredo ................................................................. Nov. 17, 1993 30-22, FORT WORTIH, TEXAS DISTRICT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 30-E (See Section 29 of Text) Project Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX.................................. ................................ $ 40,530 Beverly Hills, M cLennan Cnty, TX ............................................................. 209 Browder Creek, Springton, TX .......... .............................................. 9,859 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX .......................................................... 46,913 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX .................................................................... 90 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX ................................................................... 9,899 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX .......................................................... 13,372 Duck Creek, Garland, TX .. ................................................................ 110,020 Farmers Branch, W hite Settlement, TX ......................................................... 29,198 Greentree, Subdiv., M idland Draw, TX ......................................................... 2,747 Indian Creek, Fort Worth, TX ................................................................ 12,131 JJaochknssoonn BCrraenekd,, DG arallnads , PTrXai .r..i e, .................................................................. 80 TX ............................................................ 88,747 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX .................................................................. 22 Little W alnut Creek, Austin, TX ............................................................... 0 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX ................................................................. 101,627 Mary's Creek, Fort Worth & Benbrook, TX...................................................... 23,215 Midland/Jal Draw, Midland, TX .............................................................. 20,597 O ak St. Bridge, M idland, TX ..... ............................................................... 3,083 Perry Rd., H utton Br., Carroll, TX ............................................................. 0 Plants Creek, Seym our, TX ................................................................... 55 Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX ..... ............................................................. 0 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX ............................. ............................ 87 Red Arroyo, San Angelo, TX...................................................................34 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX ............................................................... 155,729 Seym our Creek, Seym our, TX .................................................................. 54 Singing Hills Creek, W atauga, TX ...... ....................................................... 1,101,550 South Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX ............................................................ 487 Stream 51313, D allas, TX ..................................................................... 7 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX ..................................... ........................... 117,039 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX ................................................................. 17,133 Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX ................................................................ 824 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX ............................................................. 75 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX................................. .............................. 128,196 Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX............................. ................................... 1,027 Waco Creek, Waco, TX ............................. .......................................... 12 Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX ................................................................ 90,063 Walnut Creek, Seguin, TX ..............................................................O. .0 W alnut Creek, Springtown, TX ................................................................ 6,111 Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost Bear Creek, County Rd. 485, Collin, TX................ ....................................... $ 0 Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX ...... ..................................................... 161,058 Bridge, Mary Creek, TX .................................................................... 29,251 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX .................................................. 65 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX ........... ....................................................... 0 Dice Grove, Lampasas River, Bell Co., TX ....................................................... 32 Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carrollton, TX................. ........ ...................... 0 Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX .............................................................. 14,922 Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX ........................................................... 0 Little River, Cameron, TX ................................................................... 23,998 M oss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX ...................................................... . 56 Park Row, Arlington, TX .......................................... 115 Roaring Springs Rd., Bridge, TX............................................. ....... 19,461 South Llano River, Junction, TX ............................................ 19,899 Tributary to I)udley Branch, .................................................................. 5,000 Washington on Brazos State Park, TX .......................................................... 10,626 Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX ........................................................ 240,703 Project Snagging and Clearing of Flood Control - Section 208 Cost Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX ........................................................... $ 10 78 30-23 Sulphur RW Red Riv. Franklin City, TX................................................. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT* Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brp cos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern D ivision).............................. 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX.............. 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX .............. 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX . ........ 5. Freeport Harbor, TX................... 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX........ 7. Greens Bayou Bridge, TX............... 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ............................... 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX ............... 10. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX............. 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX ........... 12. Texas City Channel, TX ................. 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ........ 13A. Anahuac Channel, TX.. ............... 13B. Channel to Liberty, TX................. 13C. Wallisville Lake, TX ............ . ...... 14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.................... .... Beach Erosion Control 16. Corpus Christi Beach, TX.......... ... Flood Control 17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ....... 17A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX....... 17B. Brays Bayou, TX ...................... 17C. Greens Bayou, TX .............. ....... 17D. Halls Bayou, TX ..................... 17E. Hunting Bayou, TX ................... 17F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX............ 17G. Carpenters Bayou, TX .................. 18. Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX .. 19. Clear Creek, TX..................... . 20. Cypress Creek, TX ................... 21. Falfurrias, TX ....................... 22. Kirbyville, TX ........................ 23. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX......... .. Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 23A. Arroyo Colorado, TX ................... 31-14 31-2 23B13. South Main Channel, TX ............... 31-14 31-2 23C. Raymondville Drain, TX................ 31-15 31-2 24. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX 31-3 Hurricane-Flood Protection ............. .31-15 31-3 25. Sims Bayou, TX....................... 31-15 31-4 26. State Highway 111 Bridge, 31-5 Lake Texana, TX...................... 31-15 27. Taylors Bayou, TX..................... 31-16 28. Texas City and Vicinity, TX 31-5 Hurricane-Flood Protection ............ .. 31-16 31-7 29. U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, 31-7 Merryville, LA........................ 31-16 31-8 30. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ........ 31-16 31-8 31. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 31-9 W orks............................... 31-17 31-9 32. Flood Control Work Under Special 31-9 Authorization......................... 31-17 31-9 33. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline 31-10 Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization ....... .... 31-17 31-10 34. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ....................... 31-17 31-10 General Investigations 35. Surveys......... 36. Planning and Engin S 37. Collection and Stud, 31-11 31-11 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31.12 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-14 31-14 31-14 eering .............. y of Basic Data ....... 31-17 31-18 31-18 Tables 31-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 31-19 thru 31-22 31-B Authorizing Legislation ....... .31-23 thru 31-37 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 31-38 31-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 31-38 31-E Total Cost of Existing Projects........... 31-39 31-F Channel Dimensions ......... 31- 40 thru 31-42 31-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels........... 31-43 thru 31-44 31-hi Dredging Operations .......... 31-45 thru 31-46 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, water-hyacinth and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the State of Texas continued. The contract was renewed for an additional year and has the option to renew for one more year. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was maintained and increased with the successful overwintering of the Hydrellia fly at Sheldon reservoir. The fly populations were supplemented with further introductions throughout the summer. Additional lakes will be added to the program in 1994. Contract costs for FY 1993 were $156,133. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 31-F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $30,488,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $17,699,258, including $8,119,258 contributed funds, $1,099,000 lands, $2,422,000 relocations, and $6,059,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1993 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The entrance channel was enlarged from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet in FY 1992. Of the 14.8 miles to )e enlarged, 8.5 miles has been completed through FY 1993. Work remaining consists of enlarging 6.3 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel from 36 feet by 200 feet to 42 feet by 250 feet. The turning basin would be enlarged to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract for dredging Inshore Reach No. 1, Stations 1+000 to 23+000, awarded July 16, 1992, was completed at a fiscal year cost of $3,494,555. A construction contract for dredging Inshore Reach No. 2, Stations 23+000 to 46+000 was awarded May 11, 1993 and continued through FY 1993 at a cost of $2,141,326. Maintenance: (See Table 31-H1 for dredging operations.) 3. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, IX Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for channel are shown in Table 31-F. (Also see Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong 31-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. No maintenance required for fiscal year. 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 31-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A construction contract for stone protection of Disposal Area No. 13 levee side slopes exposed to the bay was awarded May 25, 1993, and continued through the fiscal year at a cost of $570,919 Federal funds and $170,306 non- Federal funds. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 31-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $59,527,000 Federal (Corps); and $30,556,000 non-Federal, including $20,058,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $6,587,448 lands, $2,990,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1992 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 26, 1986, along with Amendments 1, 2 and 3, executed March 19, 1987, June 19, 1991 and June 19, 1991, respectively, require that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $9,260,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $420,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $19,100,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Dredging the Entrance Channel, Station -230+00 to 50+35.91 was physically completed April 1, 1992 and financially completed September 28, 1993, at a cost of $2,283,024 for FY 1993. The contract to rehabilitate the South Jetty and add 500 feet to the North Jetty was physically completed May 12, 1993 for a fiscal year cost of $2,866,809. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) 31-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels., Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35- ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 7. GREENS BAYOU BRIDGES, TX Location. Port of Houston Authority Railroad Bridge is located at Mile 2.8 of Greens Bayou in the vicinity of Houston, Texas. Explorer Pipeline Company's utility bridge (pipeline crossing) is also located at Mile 2.8 of Greens Bayou. Existing Project. The railroad bridge is a vertical lift bridge with a horizontal clearance of 71 feet and vertical clearance of 18 feet above high water datum in the closed position and 27 feet above high water in the open position. A permit was issued by the Department of Transportation in October 1930 and the bridge was completed in April 1931, for a fixed-span bridge. It was altered approximately in 1977 at a cost of $998,800 to accommodate navigation and the bridge type was changed from fixed to vertical lift. The utility bridge is a fixed-span bridge with a horizontal clearance of 152 feet and vertical clearance of 21 feet above low water datum. A permit was issued by the Department of Transportation in April 1971 and the bridge was completed in August 1971. No alterations have been made since the bridge was built. Section 1166a of Water Resources Development Act of 1986, (PL 99-662) authorized reimbursement for alterations which were reasonably necessary for the purpose of navigation for both bridges not to exceed $450,000 for the railroad bridge and $250,000 for the utility bridge. No reimbursement will be required for the utility bridge as no alterations have been made. Local cooperation: None required. Operations during fiscal year. Reimbursement was made to the Port of Houston Authority in the amount of $450,000 for the alterations of the railroad bridge. 8. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 31-G on existing project dimensions 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin were fiscally completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction of the recreation facilities is complete. Construction of the diversion dam and connecting channel was completed in FY 1993. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Mouth of Colorado River, construction of an oyster cultch; (2) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $102,793,000 (excluding $221,000 Department of Transportation cost for Channel to Victoria) Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non- Federal $25,222,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,533,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $2,535,000 contributed funds for Channel to Victoria, $6,022,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,291,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and $5,556,000 other costs for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1993 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Non- Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,533,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas, and $2,535,000 for Channel to Victoria. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760- foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work:-Mouth of Colorado River New Work: A contract for construction of diversion dam and connecting channel was awarded December 9, 1991 and continued through fiscal year 1993 at a cost of $70,601. A contract to repair pilings and install current velocity meters at the connecting channel was awarded July 19, 1993 and was completed September 22, 1993 at a cost of $29,400. On August 5, 1993, a contract was awarded to construct additional mooring facilities at the Mouth of the Colorado River connecting channel and continued through FY 1993 at a cost of $135,000. Channel to Victoria New Work: Engineering and design continued for the first set of plans and specifications through FY 1993. A cultural resource survey was initiated and completed and the draft Project Cooperation Agreement was developed. Also see Section 36, Planning and Engineering. Sargent Beach New Work: See Section 36, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Channel to Victoria Maintenance: A contract was awarded October 21, 1992, for maintenance of drainage structure and was completed June 21, 1993 at a fiscal year cost of $417,832. Chocolate Bayou Maintenance: A contract for dredging the Chocolate Bayou Channel was awarded August 23, 1993, and funds in the amount of $299,888 were expended in FY 1993 for mobilization costs. Channel to Port Mansfield Maintenance: Contract for dredging Channel to Port Mansfield, awarded February 2, 1990, was financially completed in FY 93 at a fiscal year cost of $146,997. Main Channel and Tributaries Maintenance: A contract for dredging Corpus Christi Bay to Mud Flats, awarded January 25, 1991, was financially completed December 3, 1993, at a cost of $34,154. Contract for emergency dredging the Colorado River crossing, awarded February 2, 1992, was equitably adjusted in FY 93 at a cost of $22,473 for encountering oyster shell. A contract for dredging Galveston Causeway to Bastrop Bayou, awarded March 20, 1992, was financially completed December 11, 1992 at a fiscal year decrease in cost of $199,076. Aransas National Wildlife Refuge: Contract awarded August 19, 1992, for 31-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT shoreline protection along the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Aransas and Nueces County was completed in October 1992 with a final cost of $6,575 for FY 1993. On June 24, 1993, a contract for erosion protection along the Refuge was awarded and completed on August 25, 1993 for a cost of $919,524. Brazos River Floodgates Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,357,365 including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. A contract to replace the guidewalls, west gate, was financially completed in October 1992 at a final cost of $7,200 expended in FY 1993. A contract to rehabilitate sector gates was awarded January 14, 1990 and was physically completed August 26, 1991. Fiscal year 1993 cost were $28,673. A contract for replacement of mooring facilities was awarded September 28, 1992 and was completed March 26, 1993 at a cost of $551,900. Colorado River Locks Maintenance: The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,335,590 including engineering and design and supervision and administration. A contract to rehabilitate sector gates was awarded January 14, 1990 and physically completed August 26, 1991. Fiscal year 1993 cost were $11,181. A contract to replace the guidewall, west lock - east gate was physically completed in July 1992 and financially completed in April 1993 with a fiscal year cost of $92,494. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 9. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreement for assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel was executed April 6, 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements were being developed for assumption of maintenance on Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $85,850. (See Table 31-H11 for dredging operations.) See Section 36, Planning and Engineering. 10. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. The costs for new work was $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR IY 1993 at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 11. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide.! Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $7,387. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" category. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point (formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. (October 1, 1988 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide levees for disposal areas and wetlands; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay onehalf of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to 31-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT deep-draft navigation to'a depth of45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10. percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 13. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1933. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 13A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Hteight of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level: Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred during the fiscal year. 13B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of"Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (II.. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rightsof- way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150- foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred during the fiscal year. 13C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $78,864,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1993 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to recommence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and directive language for continuation of construction. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September 1991. Environmental documents were approved and construction was resumed. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, onehalf of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $11,829,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for construction of non-overflow dam was awarded September 20, 1991. The contract continued through FY 1993 with a cost of $1,644,621. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition conducted on the following projects: Project Bayport Ship Channel Cedar Bayou Channel to Harlingen Channel to Port Mansfield Clear Creek Double Bayou Freeport Harbor Galveston Harbor and Channel Houston Ship Channel Texas City Channel Trinity River and Trib. 15. Date of Survey Jan - Feb 1993 Apr - May 1993 Feb 1993 and Jun - Jul 1993 Feb - Mar 1993 and May - Jun 1993 Aug 1993 Apr 1993 and Jun 1993 Aug 1993 Apr 1993 and Jun 1993 Dec 1992 - Jan 1993 Oct 1992 and May - Jun 1993 Nov 1992, Feb 1993 a: May - Jul 1993 Surveys were Fiscal Year Cost $3,186 1,677 1,637 37,697 90 4,832 4 2,805 100 10,947 nd 23,349 $86,324 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). No new reconnaissance studies for navigation channel improvements were performed in fiscal year 1993. Beach Erosion Control 16. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided. 31-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of' Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. Flood Control 17. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Cost of new work is $127,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $86,891,000 non- Federal for lands and relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.) Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 17A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Estimated cost of new work is $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds). Non-Federal funds consist of $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1991 base price.) Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work accomplished included raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work has been initiated on a construction contract, awarded for Community Park West (Phase 2) in 1988. Harris County Precinct 3, Cullen-Barker Park, completed Community Park 2 which includes soccer fields and parking lots. The plans for Community Park West, Phase III, were approved in 1989. Construction on Phase III was initiated in 1990. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. A contract to repair roadway at Addicks Dam was awarded May 29, 1992. The contract was financially completed December 3, 1992 at a cost of 6,998. 31-11 ,,.,~__-~---;------ ---- ---- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 17B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the south-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $161,376,000 Federal (Corps) and $161,376,000 non-federal consisting of $18,114,000 cash contributions, and $143,262,000 for lands and relocations (October 1993 base price). Location cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $18,114,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 36, Planning and Engineering. 17C. GREENS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $159,090,000 Federal (Corps) and $69,844,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,315,000 cash contributions, and $56,529,000 for lands and relocations (October 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,315,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 36, Planning and Engineering. 17D. HALLS BAYOU, TX Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $56,879,000 Federal (Corps) and $45,390,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,498,000 cash contributions, and $38,892,000 for lands and relocations (October 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,498,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 17E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $56,211,000 Federal (Corps) and $53,509,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,851,000 cash contributions, and $47,658,000 for lands and relocations (October 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $5,851,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 17F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and 31-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 17G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). . Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated. at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 18. BUFFALO BAYOU AT PINEY POINT VILLAGE, TX Location. The project is located on Buffalo Bayou, within the city limits of Piney Point Village, an independent, incorporated community located 10 miles west of downtown Houston and entirely surrounded by the City of Houston. Existing project. The approved plan provides for erosion protection on 260 feet of the east bank of Buffalo Bayou adjacent to Farnham Park Drive. The protection consists of lightweight aggregate and granular fill covered by gabions, with riprap toe protection. The fill and gabions will be placed on a 2 horizontal on 1 vertical slope and will be filled with 4- to 8-inch stone. Estimated cost for the new work is $318,000 Federal (Corps) and $140,000 non-Federal, consisting of $107,000 cash and $33,000 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. Local cooperation. The City of Piney Point Village is the local sponsor for the project. Operations during fiscal year. The detailed project report was completed on October 1, 1992. Work on the plans and specifications began on April 1, 1993 and was 80 percent complete on September 30, 1993. 19. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. ' Existing' project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual .00-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 19.1, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $62,920,000 Federal (Corps) and $51,216,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,707,000 cash contributions, $22,600,000 for lands, and $22,909,000 for relocations (October 1, 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 30, 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. 20. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11,5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated cost for new work is $103,586,000 Federal (Corps) and $35,747,000 non-Federal consisting of $12,934,000 cash contribution, $16,182,000 for lands, and $6,631,000 for relocations (October 1, 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $12,934,000; and bear all costs of 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section .36, Planning and Engineering. 21. FALFURRIAS, TX Location. The city of Falfurrias is located near the, confluence of Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks, intermittent streams that drain a 600-square-mile area in south Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a 5.6 mile long diversion levee; a 1.8 mile long pilot channel; a flowage easement of 11,000 acres of land subject to overflows from the pilot channel; and a 0.8 mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated cost for new work is $16,870,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,870,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,687,000 cash contribution, $13,013,000 for lands, and $2,170,000 for relocations (October 1, 1991 base price). Project was placed in the "deferred" category pending Local Sponsor's ability to provide their share of costs. Local cooperation. The local sponsor would be required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipeline, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash, contribution presently estimated at $1,687,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Project was placed in the "deferred" category pending Local Sponsor's ability to provide their, share of costs. .. Operations during fiscal year. No work was incurred in FY 1993. 22. KIRBYVILLE, TX Location. The project is located in Southeast Texas in the Sabine River basin on Trout Creek and Pin Oak Creek in the vicinity of Kirbyville, Texas, about 45 miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. The project was completed in fiscal year 1993. The plan of improvement consisted of a combination channelization and floodplain management plan for Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. The structural element consisted of a slightly enlarged channel and clearing and straightening of Trout Creek. The nonstructural part consisted of controls on future development in the residual 100-year floodplains along Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. Channel improvements in Trout Creek began about 0.8 mile downstream from the Jasper-Newton County line and ended about 0.4 mile upstream from the U.S. Highway 96 bridge. The improved, grass-lined channel is 2.7 miles long, and generally follow the existing alignment of Trout Creek. A steel sheet pile and riprap drop structure was constructed on Pin Oak Creek near its confluence with Trout Creek. Drainage culverts were constructed along the improved channel on Trout Creek to facilitate lateral drainage and control erosion. Work included some alterations to a Santa Fe Railroad bridge to accommodate the project and a new roadway bridge providing approximately 2,000 square feet of opening for passage of floodwaters. Cost for new work was $1,484,613 Federal (Corps) and $501,552 non-Federal consisting of $99,000 cash contribution, $402,552 for lands and relocations. Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is the City of Kirbyville, Texas. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed by the sponsor in August 1987. Operations during fiscal year. Project was financially completed in fiscal year 1993 and turned over to the local sponsor. 23. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 23A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $5,851,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,951,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,848,000 cash and $103,000 for lands and relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,848,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 36, Planning and Engineering. 23B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $107,976,000 Federal (Corps) and $64,700,000 non-Federal consisting of $8,634,000 cash and $28,107,000 lands and $27,959,000 relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project 31-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, I)ISTRICT are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $8,634,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 36, Planning and Engineering funds. 23C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madres for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $50,132,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,711,000 non-Federal consisting of $4,194,000 cash and $6,142,000 lands and $6,375,000 relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $4,194,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 24. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, iTX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $62,350,000 Federal (Corps) and $27,150,000 non-Federal consisting of $17,342,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,405,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. A severe settlement problem exists in the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm area. The Galveston District continued preparation of plans and specifications for repair of the levee settlement. 25. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $191,520,000 Federal (Corps) and $86,881,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,253,000 cash contributions, $29,724,000 for lands, $40,633,000 for relocations and $271,000 for channels (October 1, 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Fiscal Year 1993 operations include coordination of real estate requirements with the local sponsor and completion of a redesign of the project to make it more environmentally sound and aesthetically pleasing. 26. STATE HIGHWAY 111 BRIDGE, LAKE TEXANA, TX Location. The project is located 8.5 miles Southeast of Edna, Texas and 31 miles Northeast of Victoria, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement requires placement of granular fill and stone protection along the embankment slope at the southwest end of the East Relief Bridge to form a slope of 1 on 4. Stone protection will consist of an 18-inch layer of riprap placed on a 6-inch layer of graded blanket stone. The work will require placement of 2400 tons of granular fill, 390 tons of blanket stone and 1170 tons of stone riprap. Estimated cost for new work is $276,000 Federal (Corps) and $92,000 non- Federal consisting of $91,600 cash contribution and $400 for land. 31-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Local cooperation. The State of Texas is the local sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on July 17, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed in April 1992. 27. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivitot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $39,100,000 Federal (Corps) and $41,100,000 non-Federal, including $13,419 cash contribution, $3,662,000 lands, and $24,019,000 for relocations (October 1, 1993 base price). Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. Contract for channel rectification, Station 10+00 to Station 185+00 on Willow Marsh Bayou, was awarded March 14, 1991 and terminated September 3, 1991 by order of the Contracts Appeals Board. Funds in the amount of $9,996 were expended in FY 1993 for termination costs. Contract for channel rectification of Bayou Din and Pivitot Bayou, awarded November 4, 1991, physically completed October 23, 1992, was financially completed March 12, 1993, at a cost of $47,630. Channel rectification contract for Hillebrandt Bayou Station 543+50 to Station 751+00 was awarded January 13, 1992 and was physically completed March 19, 1993, at a fiscal year cost of $1,256,567. A contract for channel rectification on Willow Marsh Bayou, Stations 12+00 to 135+00 was awarded December 12, 1991 and was physically completed March 20, 1993, at a fiscal year cost of $708,494. A contract for channel rectification of Hillebrandt Bayou, Station 350+00 to Station 543+50 was awarded January 13, 1993 and continued through the fiscal year at a cost of $2,345,900. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 28. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962, and physically completed in 1987; however, remedial measures required to approximately 1.7 miles of levee toe to avoid further erosion were made in 1990. Estimated cost for new work is $38,983,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,023,000 non- Federal, including $14,603,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,349,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. None required. 29. U.S. 190 BRIDGE, SABINE RIVER, MERRYVILLE, LA Location. The project area is located about 52 miles north of Beaumont, Texas on the border between Louisiana and Texas. Existing project. The project was completed in fiscal year 1993. The plan of improvement consisted of placing riprap to protect the most eroded bridge piers, the streambed between the piers, and the eastern streambank. Also included was riprap protection 200 feet upstream and 100 feet downstream to protect the streambank from erosion during periods of high velocity flow. The cost of new work was $737,792 which includes $500,000 Federal (Corps) and $237,792 non-Federal cash contribution. Local cooperation. The local sponsor for the project is the State of Louisiana. Coordination is maintained with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, the Texas Highway Department and the United States Fish and Wildlife Services. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed May 31, 1991. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for erosion protection was awarded September 30, 1991 and was physically completed in July 1992. The contract was financially completed in FY 1993 at a cost of $1,400. 30. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from 31-16 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT mouth to a point about 4.2,miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Cost for new work was $19,347,000 Federal (Corps) and, $17,300,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,100,000 for lands and $12,200,000 for relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. None required. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $173,683. Date of Project Inspection Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX - Emergency Streambank Protection Brays Bayou, TX - Channel Rectification Corpus Christi Beach, TX - Beach Restoration Galveston Seawall, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection Little Vince Bayou, TXFlood Protection Taylors Bayou, TX - Drainage, Flood Control, Salt Water Barrier Texas City, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection Tranquitas Creek, TX - Flood Protection at Kingsville, TX Vince Bayou, TX - Flood Protection White Oak Bayou, TX - Channel Rectification February 1993 May 1993 February 1993 December 1992 May 1993 January 1993 April 1993 February 1993 May 1993 May 1993 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Construction of a flood control project at Kirbyville, Texas is discussed in Section 22. Feasibility studies continued at a fiscal year cost of $5,423 on the Lower Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas. Funds in the amount of $13,367 were expended from contributed funds on the project. Reconnaissance studies continued on the Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, Texas at a 1993 fiscal year cost of $1,427. Fiscal year 1992 reconnaissance cost was $2,450. Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Cost was $315,022 for disaster preparedness and $46,808 for emergency operations. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $77,865. Relief activities for Hurricane Andrew were reimbursed in the amount of $15,046. Rehabilitation field investigation reimbursements for White Oak Bayou, Brays Bayou, Mason Creek, Keegans Bayou, Tributaries to Gum Gully and Cole Creek were received in FY 93 in the amounts of $13,025; $9,623; $14,398; $10,140; $9,052; and $9,984 respectively. 33. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: Construction of the erosion control project at State Highway Bridge 111, Lake Texana, Texas is discussed in Section 24. Construction of the erosion control project at U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, Louisiana is discussed in Section 27. Construction of the steambank protection project at Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, Texas is discussed in Section 18. Feasibility study of streambank protection at Colorado County, Texas was completed at a fiscal year cost of $12,315 and was terminated. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing activities for flood control improvements were performed in fiscal year 1993. 34. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications for improvement of environment activities pursuant to Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: An integrated project modification report and an environmental assessment was completed for Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch Wetlands, Texas at a fiscal year cost of $173,653. A project modification report and an environmental assessment was completed in fiscal year 1992 for the Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration project, a demonstration project to plant seagrass in Laguna Madre, Texas. A total cost of $105 was incurred for fiscal year 1993. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $956,878 of which $104,378 was for navigation studies; $6,353 was for flood damage prevention studies; $669,377 was for Review of Completed 31-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Projects; $6,077 was for coordination with other agencies; $63,615 was for Special Investigations; $17,948 for Interagency Water Resources; $15,930 was for National Estuary Studies; $3,081 for the American Waterfowl Management Plan; and $70,118 was for Planning Assistance to States. Contributed funds in the amount of $711 were expended for the State of Texas Coastal Management study. Contributed funds in the amount of $30,000 were expended for the Texas Coastal Erosion Program. 36. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Channel to Victoria, Texas - The project will provide for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet, the same dimensions as the Gulf' Intracoastal Waterway, with disposal of the dredged materials in upland areas. In addition, the project includes creation of additional marsh along the landlocked reach of the channel. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,434,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $5,978. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Ship Channel. The recommended plan for the Houston Ship Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 600-foot wide channel to the vicinity of the Shell Docks at Boggy Bayou in Houston with additional widening to the Clinton Island Turning Basin. The recommended plan for the Galveston Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 450-foot wide channel within the existing 1,125-foot channel. The 50-foot by 800-foot entrance channel,' previously authorized with the Texas City Channel but unconstructed, is also incorporated into this project. The project was recommended to be constructed in two phases, with Phase I enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to 45 by 530 feet, the Galveston Ship Channel enlarged to 45 by 450 feet, and deepening the entrance channel to 45 feet. Phase II would deepen both channels to 50 feet and widen the Houston Ship Channel to 600 feet. A locally preferred dredged material disposal plan for Galveston Bay has been incorporated with the plan of improvement. The plan would utilize confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay and/or offshore disposal for Phase I and Phase II construction activities and the operations and maintenance resulting from them. The 50-foot increment (Phase II) was found to not be economically justified and the local sponsors have agreed that the work on this increment be stopped. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $18,000,000. Estimated planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $3,405,420. Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,010,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $579,371. Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,910,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $626,849. Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. Projectoriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of hikeand- bike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $7,800,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $228,779. Arroyo Colorado, Texas - The project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $85,330. South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $5,500,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $328,060. Sargent Beach, Texas - The project consists of construction of approximately 8 miles of concrete-block revetment with two concrete sheetpile wall segments and tow protection on the barrier between a 10-mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas and the Gulf of Mexico. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,500,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1992. Fiscal year costs were $974,894. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management, technical services and quick responses were performed at a cost of $9,494, $38,516 and $2,467, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $9,345. Flood plain management services were provided for Jasper County, Texas; Kemah, Texas; and League City, Texas at a fiscal year cost of $11,482; $1,820; and $1,115, respectively. 31-18 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 199329 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act .. 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Greens Bayou Bridges, TX 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost 296,000 301,148 742,000 831,456 2,009,715 1,961,671 232,500 229,030 315,000 305,088 235,000 209,979 1,971,000 1,887,976 1,337,400 2,267,000 1,077,977 2,571,235 292,000 317,642 4,973,000 4,181,644 70,000 69,987 3,973,600' 3,888,703' 20,951,5022 19,979,8892 47,810,4763 47,807,2253 - 2,170,080 - 2,170,080 - 62,000 - 51,707 790,564 1,775,990 1,759,261 (-)10,400 - (-)100,000 56,878 28,04 2,007,100 5,110,0( 1,642,951 5,481,01 66,190 - 7,924,000 10,140,000 11,764,019 12,707,229 49,700 297,000 44,541 301,318 13,534,0( 13,967,8k 1,095,0( 958,0 - 133,9254 - 133,9254 1,000 1,226,5015 593 1,226,0125 - 300,00 46 78,06 00 2,903,0( 15 2,786,61 - 24,07 D0 5,128,00 80 4,445,97 D0 4,299,5C 33 4,430,68 )0 35 76,835,3596 76,577,9266 )0 100,269,748' 18 100,133,844' - 3,576,684 - 3,576,684 - 6,279,088 70 5,983,232 )0 57,560,1528 78 57,579,6338 )0 55,879,9159 33 55,871,5299 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 29,096,39210 - - - - 29,096,39210 3,229,365 3,846,000 279,000 4,664,200 95,122,288"1 3,130,578 3,933,178 270,875 4,659,585 95,085,021" - - - - 7,969,329 - - - - 7,969,329 - - - 450,000 450,000 - - - 450,000 450,000 4,636,000 4,286,153 10,723,994 9,852,912 1,279,000 2,127,947 25,255,600 24,499,694 2,557,000 2,565,623 23,302,700 24,079,198 800,000 669,946 18,104,300 18,697,321 78,995,30312 78,644,57712 313,845,242"3 313,358,95314 - 434,638 - 434,638 - 835,873 - 835,873 31-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 19939 9. Houston Ship Channel, New Work: TX Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 10. Matagorda, Ship New Work: Channel, TX Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 11. Sabine-Neches New Work: Waterway, TX Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 12. Texas City Channel, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost 13. Trinity River and New Work: Tributaries, TX (In- Approp. cludes Wallisville) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 16. Corpus Christi Beach, New Work: TX (Restoration Project) Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 17. Buffalo Bayou and New Work: Tributaries, TX Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost 18. Buffalo Bayou at New Work: Piney Point, Village, TX Approp. Cost 19. Clear Creek, TX New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost - - - - 35,760,3821- - - - - 35,760,382 , 9,231,155 6,190,000 2,380,500 9,805,000 141,532,778 " 9,047,821 6,457,007 2,311,819 9,856,764 141,506,5766 - - 18,058,77717 - - - - 18,058,77717 1,027,350 425,300 2,364,200 1.420,000 47,588,738 1,040,131 399,742 2,393,060 1,419,607 47,586,550 - - - - 56,136,81514 - - - - 56,136,815" 3,716,320 15,507,600 4,952,000 3,345,000 174,180,540m' 3,701,954 14,305,233 5,893,587 3,574,412 174,127,8861" 2,346 867,050 860,271 3,944,000 299,842 2,030,711 1,865,559 2,761 - 15,131,9722') - 15,131,972 1" - 201,000 1,483,500 26,166,01121 5,315 166,220 1,521,052 26,165,95121 - - - 726,158 - - - 726,158 - - 2,700,000 35,923,67622 214,608 2,257,188 3,114,931 35,047,27522 710,000 795,000 356,500 15,578,51423 841,233 819,140 403,226 15,558,826 3 - - - - 2,120,641 20,914 - - - 2,120,641 - - - - 2,038,345 - - - - 2,009,710 928,000 756,000 1,249,100 813,000 60,952,42424 629,956 713,744 1,018,131 1,210,570 60,778,72524 - - - - 377,804 7,605 333 11,500 - 377,623 1,233,702 1,215,140 1,077,000 1,642,000 1,035,815 1,678,401 166,000 193,000 1,450,000 699,348 810,185 1,449,168 - - 20,000 - - 15,921 3,000,000 1,182,000 460,000 2,801,151 1,954,817 758,300 - 140,000 - 159,673 120,200 - 1,297,000 26,201,115 1,357,827 26,146,068 - 12,475,000 - 12,475,000 - 12,773,000 931 12,688,834 78,000 98,000 72,592 88,513 617,000 13,479,361 453,258 13,125,979 - 640,000 - 618,596 31-20 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 93 FY 93 Sep. 30, 199329 20. Cypress Creek, TX 21. Falfurrias, TX 22. Kirl)yville, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 24. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds), 25. Sims Bayou, TX 26. State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX 27. Taylors Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 28. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 29. U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA 30. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 214,000 564,000 127,009 473,731 171,000 (-)67,000 95,343 7,686 - 30,000 711,902 200,759 64,272 175,000 167,567 71,628 14,347 341,000 283,803 56,644 - - 22,935 2,164 1,158,000 3,047,000 917,100 3,193,103 - 27,000 4,056 20,486 2,942,000 3,314,535 1,275,000 1,316,854 930,000 863,748 150,000 133,823 49,000 22,491 750,000 (-)456,00 216,496 228,77 424 (-)3,38 21,99 3,01 9,00 26,198 5,984 726,900 626,365 96,000 77,157 41,000 32,850 1,190,000 1,301,424 9,000 7,131 1,091,000 2,903,000 1,184,924 3,158,775 - 1,491,000 155,027 1,798,713 (-)35,000 (-)56,000 13,607 (-)14,073 5,831 423,000 33,216 (-)16,000 (-)24,000 5,645 38,127 )0 1,072,000 79 1,046,015 - 104,000 - 103,453 7 1,484,613 8 1,484,613 6 99,000 0 99,000 516,000 1,758,900 413,391 1,491,126 170,000 60,168,509 116,523 60,085,005 45,800 31,377 1,514,000 1,381,353 21,155 23,439 3,477,000 3,425,816 2,470,600 1,916,405 (-)9,000 313 16,378,7752.5 16,354,01325 9,299,000 9,140,6032 6 79,155 73,005 35,143,198 34,618,348 12,270,600 11,616,645 38,882,400 38,882,400 - (-)4,793 14,396,30727 14,073 - 14,396,30727 411,638 8,000 12,879 500,00028 500,00028 - 19,307,100 - 19,307,100 Excludes $1,431,891 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $6,605,787 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. Excludes $42,600 exended from contributed funds for dock removal for the ocal sponsor. 3In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed funds. 4Includes $48,711 for previous projects. I Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. IIncludes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $818,228 expended from contributed funds. 8 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $19,339,781 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 on 45' project.) 9 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. o1In0c ludes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 31-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT " Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,122,583 expended from contributed funds. 12 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($3,340,601). 1' Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $6,284,480. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,397,000. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $2,618,650. Channel to Port Mansfield $2,927,785. Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes Channel to Red Bluff $1,776,200. Also includes $2,175,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992. 14 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $6,160,059, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,396,636. In addition $673,100 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $2,618,286. Channel to Port Mansfield $2,927,587. Includes funds in the amount of $1,620,347 expended for Channel to Red Bluff, separately funded in fiscal year 1990. Also includes an expended amount of $2,174,982 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. 5 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 16 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. Includes appropriated funds for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $29,000. Barbour Terminal Channel $22,500. Bayport Ship Channel $1,956,200. Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $28,936. Barbour Terminal Channel $22,391. Bayport Ship Channel $1,953,310. 11 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. '" Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. ' Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $3,954,841 expended from contributed funds. 20 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 22 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 2: Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 24 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. .25 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 2 Excludes $84,961 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 27 Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 2' Excludes $237,792 expended from contributed funds. 21 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 31-22 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BIRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Dee pen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Dee en to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet."7 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of parktype public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. II. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.i Sec. 201, PL 99-662 31-23 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1919 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep." Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin.,' CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend (like on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet; and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. 31-24 H. D)oc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nr)d Sess. H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H11D. oc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. I. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Docs. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 ' Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen AveryPoint turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels anrid basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deepq from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery IPoint turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by UnitedStates. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. 31-25 H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19351 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of ID 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Specified in Act. 11. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 31-26 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910' Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. GALVESTON HIIARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end ofold inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street." Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.1� Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. 31-27 TABLE 31-B Sec. 101, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. I. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res. Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 19381' Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. GREENS BAYOU BRIDGES, TX Reimbursement to the owner of a bridge over Greens Bayou, Texas, approximately two and eight-tenths miles upstream of the confluence of Greens Bayou and the Houston Ship Channel. GULF INTRACOASTAI, WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORI)ER12 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. 11. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. Sec. 1166, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 11. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 11. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-28 7. 8. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section AuthorizingPrjctoirkA h iz in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main chatnnel to vicinity of larlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 31-29 S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. I)oc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 19657 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas. HOUSTON SHIP CHIANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike. 8 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. IH. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 101 (20), PL 102-580 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. 31-30 9. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 19582" Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 10. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou."' Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallowdraft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.2 ' Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc.' 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-31 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 11. Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935"1 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Hiarbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 773, 61 st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-32 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196223 Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine- Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaclies of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine- Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted fortion of channel between Port Arthur west turning asin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. 31-33 TABLE 31-B I. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 12. Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Nov. 17, 1986 13. Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep chlannel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallowdraft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity I. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. I. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-34 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 16. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 17. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 19. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, play-grounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.30 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 31-35 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. Nov. 17, 1988 21. Nov. 17, 1988 23. Nov. 17, 1986 24. Oct. 23, 1962 25. Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 29, 1989 27. Oct. 27, 1965 28. Jul. 3, 1958 30. Oct. 23, 1962 CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. FALFURRIAS, TX Construction of a 5.6-mile long diversion levee west of Falfurrias; a 1.8-mile long pilot channel west of Falfurrias; a flowage easement; and a 0.8-mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 28 SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. Amended the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorization as project cost estimate had exceeded limit established in Section 902 of WRDA 1986. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of d(liversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge. 9 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 103, PL 101-101 H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Contains latest published maps. I Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4 Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. . -West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 1 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. SDredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. 8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 31-36 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents I)eepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 1 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 1: Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 1 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. I Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. '9 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2o Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 2:3 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&HI Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2. Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 21 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 3) Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. :1 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-37 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1993 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)' 1967 38,252' - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington : 1924 216,989' 223,010 Cedar Bayou, TX 1990 681,263A 2,809,8169 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 Double Bayou, TX 1987 226,558 East 1,412,07810 Bay (Hanna Reef), TX' 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou, LA6 11933, 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX7 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff): 1971 - SExcludes $1,672 work contribution. Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth TX, constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. uHnadrebro rD Aepcat rt(mH.e nDt ooc.f A1r1m4,y 8p1esrtm iCt.ong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 SDeauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. Includes $399 ,08 f)r previous projects. In addition SIncludes $123,676 for previous projects. $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 5 In inactive category for maintenance. "0 Includes $69 784 for previous projects. 6 Channel adequate for existing commerce. funds. In addition, 102,325 expende from contributed TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1993 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, Texas 1986 201,300 - Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection' 1984 29,285,042 . - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas' 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5 * 5,835,927 - Upper White Oak Bayou, Texas 1989 972,300 - IInactive. 2 Completed. SIn addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. SDeauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-38 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1993 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, T) 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Hlarbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 12. Texas City Channel, TX 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project X Regular Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 16,455,474 2,848,560 6,482,426 25,786,460 85,214 85,214 74,881,105 324,287 5,984,000 81,189,392 1,716,695 276,720 83,182,807 56,315,960 116,575 19,335,212 75,767,747 360,249 76,127,996 11,920,187 8,754,209 0 3,648,932 24,323,328 77,471,391 466,477 4,443,085 82,380,953 395,000 139,776 82,915,729 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,628,853 136,296 1,023,819 15,788,968 33,080,969 66,000 33,146,969 25,970,868 0 0 25,970,868 47,807,225 0 1,352,092 49,159,317 1,179,911 1,179,911 100,071,392 0 818,228 100,889,620 0 0 100,889,620 55,871,528 0 229,311 56,100,839 0 56,100,839 94,473,611 512,163 13,121 2,122,583 97,121,478 311,832,399 0 22,672 311,855,071 0 0 311,855,071 140,209,463 0 334,641 140,544,104 171,748,209 0 3,954,841 175,703,050 0 0 175,703,050 2,170,080) 0 0 2,170,080 0 0 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 8,935 0 0 8,935 0 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 0 0 7,969,329 1,270,511 0 0 1,270,511 0 0 1,270,511 726,158 0 0 726,158 66,432,779 2,848,560 7,834,518 77,115,857 1,265,125 1,265,125 178,529,181 324,287 6,802,228 185,655,696 1,716,695 276,720 187,649,111 112,196,423 116,575 19,564,523 131,877,521 360,249 132,237,770 113,767,154 9,862,345 13,121 5,771,515 129,414,135 390,574,301 466,477 4,465,757 395,506,535 395,000 139,776 396,041,311 169,251,756 2,612,932 1,717,401 173,582,089 221,340,540 1,363,652 6,058,276 228,762,468 32,000 116,760 228,911,228 41,325,879 136,296 1,023,819 42,485,994 48,096,133 66,000 48,162,133 15,015,164 0 15,015,164 31-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS, Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. 44-42 400 38-36 300 2.5 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 Brazos Island Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Harbor, TX Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Corpus Christi Aransas Pass Outer Bar Ship Channel, Channel TX Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Freeport Outer Bar Channel Harbor, TX Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel 300 300 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200-1 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250 ,1 100 200 150 150 400 400 7501 400 1,0004 375 1,200" 200 500 200 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 200 200 200 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 200' 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,050 ' 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2501- 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 1,300 1,470 1,200 1,470 1,230 770 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 - 0.1 200 - 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 1,690 1,000 1,000 800 1,250 400 0.6 0.3 3.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 5.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.8 3.0 0.8 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 500 1.1 0.1 0.5 31-40 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 4. 5. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 5. (Continued) 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou TyIning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 7501 30 525-675 67.~ 0.1 750 800 800 800' 2,875' 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-200' 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,070 , 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 5 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.8' - 1.0 - 3.9 - 26.2 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 3,100 1,000 2,000 1,000 2.9 0.6 0.2 0.9 3.1 0.4 3.8 0.3 1.9 60 - 4.1 60 - 0.8 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 31-41 TABLE 31-F 67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 11. (Continued) Port Arthur West Turning Basin 40 600 40 350-550 1,610 0.3 Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins 40 200-250 40 200-250 - 0.6 Taylors Bayou Turning B3asin 40 150-1,000 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River 40 400 40 400 - 11.2 Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 9004 40 9004 - Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin 40 400 40 400 - 18.3 Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 1,0001 40 1,000 700 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 1,0001 40 1,000 930 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 1,000" 40 1,300 1,530 8 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 36 350 36 350 1,265 0.2 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sahine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 Average. 2 Includes 100-foot channel width. 3 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4 Diameter. Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. SI)eauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. SIncludes 300-foot channel width. 3 142 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 31-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in 'Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles 12 12 2 12 3 12 4 9999 99 15-12 12 , 12 12 12 12 S 12 12 12 999 99999 14 14 14 14 10 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 6 0 0 ,AvG) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12 12 12 12 99 99 12 12 12 12 99 9 999 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 2,200 500 635 1,130 -I 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500AVG) 100 100 200 100 200 3 4 2 ,AVG, 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 0.4 300 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 1,250 580 860 1,450 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 - 34.8 8 0 0 (Av, 0.1 - 0.8 - 2.0 230 - - 0.5 - 2.1 1,225 0.2 - 6.1 2,212 0.4 125 - 1,800 0.3 - 0.8 31-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 - 25.8 2 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. 1Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 1 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 1n Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) " South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 31-44 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Inshore Reach No. 1 Station 1+000 to 23+000 October 1,1992 to April 5, 1993 2,396,330 $2,163,542 Dredging Inshore Reach No. 2, Station 23+000 to 46+000 June 6, 1993 to September 30, 1993 1,158,291 $1,094,113 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging LaQuinta Junction to Light Beacon 82 February 25, 1993 to May 4, 1993 2,180,280 $918,506 Emergency Dredging Corpus Christi Entrance Channel (US Hopper D)redge Wheeler) October 1, 1992 to December 6, 1992 908,588 $700,040 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Freeport H larbor and Entrance Channel October 1, 1992 to November 24, 1992 2,082,437 $1,158,342 Dredging Inside Channels February 22, 1993 to March 24, 1993 461,269 $603,867 Dredging Entrance Channel (US Hopper Dredge Wheeler) June 9, 1993 to September 4, 1993 1,415,742 $2,466,666 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel and Anchorage Area April 23, 1993 to September 30,1993 2,892,622 $4,164,108 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brazos River to Vicinity FM 457, San Bernard River Channel and Brazos River Floodgates Boat Slip January 12, 1993 to April 7, 1993 1,069,931 $1,433,194 Dredging Vicinity of Rollover Pass and Port Bolivar January 26, 1993 to May 13,1993 1,126,015 $1,494,967 Dredging Turnstake Island to Sundown Bay with Beneficial Use of Dredged Material May 22, 1993 to September 30, 1993 2,282,253 $2,088,816 Emergency Dredging Freeport Harbor to Brazos River Crossing September 17, 1993 to September 30, 1993 139,921 $624,366 Dredging Channel to Harlingen October 1, 1992 to October 12, 1992 308,768 $75,709 Dredging Vicinity FM 467 to Boggy Bayou and Colorado River to Matagorda Bay October 1, 1992 to March 12, 1993 1,540,102 $916,358 Dredging Matagorda Bay to San Antonio Bay October 1, 1992 to December 3, 1992 364,940 $433,046 Dredging Main Channel in Matagoda Bay October 1, 1992 to October 15, 1992 12,522 $16,279 Dredging Navigation Channel and Impounding Basin at Mouth of Colorado River October 1, 1992 to February 13, 1993 1,963,300 $2,151,541 31-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Morgan Point to Carpenter Bayou September 11, 1992 to July 23, 1993 2,983,792 $6,577,769 Dredging Bayport Ship Channel July 5, 1993 to August 16, 1993 1,462,980 $1,762,917 Dredging Houston Ship Channel July 5, 1993 to August 16, 1993 882,129 $345,915 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel (US Hopper Dredge Wheeler) August 11, 1993 to September 7, 1993 964,186 $1,233,580 Dredging Channel to Red Bluff August 30, 1993 to September 30, 1993 17,309 $640,977 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Turning Basin and Junction Area October 1, 1992 to January 12, 1993 1,890,000 $2,196,000 Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel October 1, 1992 to November 7, 1992 1,307,600 $387,040 Texas City Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Texas City Channel, Turning Basin and Industrial Canal October 1, 1992 to December 18, 1992 1,825,993 $1,445,411 Taylors Bayou, TX (New Work) Dredging Bayou Din and Pivitot Bayou October 1, 1992 to October 23, 1992 147,273 $23,815 Dredging Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 543+50 to 751+00 and Willow Marsh Bayou Sta. 0+00 to 12+00 October 1, 1992 to March 19, 1993 355,560 $657,112 Channel Rectification, Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 350+00 to Sta. 543+50 February 23, 1993 to September 30, 1993 210,916 $1,290,245 31-46 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM . . . . . . . . 2. Alamogordo, NM .................. 3. Alamosa, CO .................... 4. Cochiti Wetfields, NM ............... 5. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM..... 6. Conchas Lake, NM ................. 7. El Paso, TX. ........ ............ 8. Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO ............. 9. John Martin Reservoir, CO . . . . . . . . . ... 10. Puerco River, Gallup, NM .............. 11. Rio Grande Basin, NM ................. 1lA. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................. lIB. Cochiti Lake, NM ................. SllC. Galisteo Dam, NM .................. SlD. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ............. I IE. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM .............. SIF. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ..... ........ . 1 IG. Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM ......... Page 32-1 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-6 32-7 32-7 32-7 32-8 Flood Control (Continued) 11 H. Truth or Consequences Unit, NM .. . . . . . . 12. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM .......... 13. Trinidad Lake, CO .................. 14. Two Rivers Dam, NM ............... 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... 16. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations .................. 17. Other authorized flood control projects .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 18. Flood control work under special authorizations ................ General Investigations 19. Surveys ................... ,...... 20. Collection and study of basic data .......... 21. Environmental Data Studies ............. 22. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ... 23. Advance Engineering and Design .......... Flood Control 1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in northcentral New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 Page 32-8 32-8 32-9 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-11 32-11 32-12 32-12 32-12 32-12 32-12 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater ,than normal tresulting from spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. ..Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts were awarded in FY 1988, FY 1989, FY 1990, FY 1991, FY 1992 and FY 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed on structures for three projects in FY 1993: El Ancone Diversion Ditch, Cabresto Irrigation Ditch and Santa Cruz and Llano Ditch. 2. ALAMOGORDO, NM Location. The project is located in south central New Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the eastern edge of the Tularosa (Closed) Basin. Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with a Standard Project Flood flow capacity, which will intercept flows from the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and Results during fiscal year. An Interim Letter Report, which addressed locally preferred alternatives for the 100-year flood protection, was prepared and submitted. The letter report was approved and a Limited Reevaluation Report will be prepared. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Design efforts will continued through FY 1992. 3. ALAMOSA, CO Location. The project lies in south central Colorado along the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. Proposed Project. The project consists of a levee system which will replace and augment the existing spoil bank levees. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design activities were initiated in FY 1990 and continued through the fiscal year. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Design efforts continued during FY 1993. 4. COCHITI WETFIELDS, NM Location. Cochiti Dam and Lake is in north-central New Mexico approximately 50 miles north of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Pueblo de Cochiti is located immediately downstream of the dam. Proposed Project. The project consists of installing an underground drainage system on 625 acres, the establishment of an operation, maintenance, and replacement sinking fund, settlement of past crop losses sustained by Pueblo de Cochiti, and wetland mitigation. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operation and results during fiscal year. Plans and specification were completed in FY 1993. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Design efforts continued and a construction contract was ready for award at the beginning of FY 1994. 5. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. The project is located in an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of the Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the 32-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a mile over the river to an elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of the Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channel prevented $2,393,300 in flood damages during FY 1993. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented are $140,202,300. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1993 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 3,010 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 122 c.f.s. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. Additionally, a hydraulic flow problem exists on the North Diversion Channel. A model study, completed in February 1986, identified corrective measures. A letter report will be completed this FY (94) addressing alternatives to correct the hydraulic deficiency. 6. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. The dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State mapl) of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side have an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. $80,200 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1993 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1993 were $3,557,300. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1993 were $140,300. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1993 were $10,009,100. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1993 was 4,197.04 feet with corresponding storage of 279,437 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period were 102,167 acre-feet. Releases of 99,309 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,850 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. The pool elevation on September 30, 1993 was 4,194.44 feet with corresponding storage of 257,518 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 716 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project began in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. A contract to realign the north and south dam road approaches is scheduled for award in July 1994. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 7. EL PASO, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1992 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990). During FY 1992 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Pershing Dam, Dam Safety Assurance work was completed in December 1992. It was the only remaining work in the Central Area. The Northwest Area of the project for all practical purposes is 100 percent complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area was completed in September 1987. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, in June 1992 on Phelps Dodge Channel, and in March 1993 on Americas Basin. 8. FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Location. The project is located on Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in the city of Pueblo in southeastern Colorado. Pueblo is approximately 30 miles east of the Wet Mountains of the Rocky Mountains. (See Geological Survey Map, Northeast Pueblo, CO quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the project comprises 11,500 feet of channel modification and 9,700 feet of levee which will provide a 200-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $8,880,000 ($6,410,000 Federal and $2,470,000 non-Federal). (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds for initiation of construction were initially received in fiscal year 1987. A construction contract for recreation was awarded in September 1987. The remaining construction contract for levees and channel work was awarded 21 June 1988. Constnruction was substantially complete in July 1989. Condition at end of year. Construction on the levees and channel began in July 1988 and the entire project was completed in April 1991. 9. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, in Bent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 608,250 acre-feet (259,800 for flood control and 348,450 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17- 16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. $137,000 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1993. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented 32-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT by this project through FY 1993 were $92,266,300. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1993 were $244,200. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $25,464,700. Maximum pool elevation of 3,821.85 feet with corresponding storage of 98,851 acre-feet occurred on June 23, 1993. Total releases for FY 1993 were 193,475 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 62,125 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 1,223 acre-feet in FY 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. A contract to for painting the tainter gates is scheduled for award in August 1994. The project structures are in good condition and operational. 10. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Location. The project is located on the Puerco River in the city of Gallup in northwestern New Mexico in McKinley County. Proposed project. This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662 and the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of.1988. The project consists of improvement of existing levees, construction of new levees and limited channel rectification. The project will provide the 100-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $6,670,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $1,670,000 non-Federal) 1 October 1989 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. A construction contract for the 1-40 Auxiliary Levee was awarded in September 1988. The remaining construction contracts for the construction of the levees and channel improvement were awarded in June 1989. The entire project was completed in July 1991. Condition at end of year. The construction contract for levee and channel improvement was awarded in June 1989. The project was completed in July 1991. 11. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation and Table 32-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 1 A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 568,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,198,500 acre-feet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the County of Los 32-5 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TiE ARMY ON CIVIL, WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1992, the pool elevation was 6,205.49 feet. The maximum pool (6,236.81 feet) and storage (264,472 acre-feet) occurred on June 7, 1993. On September 30, 1993, the pool elevation was 6,226.84 feet with a corresponding storage of 218,137 acre-feet. There was 1,711 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1993. There were $68,067,100 in flood damages prevented during FY 1993. Sediment damages prevented were $191,600. Accumulated. flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $309,581,900 through FY 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. A contract to paint the tower shaft is scheduled for award in August 1994. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. Emergency gates were not installed in the outlet conduit of Abiquiu Dam during its construction. A plan for the Abiquiu Dam emergency gates has been prepared in accordance with Section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction of the emergency gates is necessary to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. A Design Memorandum was prepared in FY 1991. 1lB. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 597,000 acrefeet at the spillway crest, of which 155,000 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation and sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1992, the pool elevation was 5,334.76 feet with a corresponding storage of 49,493 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,355.92 feet with a storage of 831802 acrefeet on June 2, 1993. On September 30, 1993 the pool elevation was 5,335.68 feet with a corresponding storage of 50,557 acrefeet. There was 1,272 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1993. There were $32,889,000 flood damages prevented during FY 1993. Sediment damages prevented were $142,500. Accumulated total damages prevented are $297,263,700. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. A contract to paint the service gates is underway and is scheduled to be completed in March 1994. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 1iC. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right abutment. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of flood control storage and 9,868 acre-feet of sediment space. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. 32-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1992. No storage occurred during FY 1993. Peak inflow was 835 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 210 c.f.s. There was 35 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1993. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $3,900 totaling $139,300 through FY 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. lID. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest ofBernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey map for Bemrnalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 100,485 acre-feet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1992, the pool elevation was 5,193.86 feet with a corresponding storage of23,636 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,200.82 feet with a storage of 33,305 acre-feet on June 1, 1993. On September 30, 1993 the pool elevation was 5,192.67 feet with a corresponding storage of 22,120 acrefeet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1993. Sediment deposition during FY 1993 was 715 acrefeet. There were $5,304,700 in flood damages prevented during FY 1993. Sediment benefits during FY 1993 were $80,100. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1993 were $17,513,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. A contract to dewater the stilling basin for inspection is schedule for Award in June 1994. Project structures are in good condition and all structures are in operation. 1 iE. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Location. The project is composed of 45 square miles of floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270- year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 acres to satisfy fish and wildlife mitigation requirements. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $59,300,000 ($44,600,000 Federal and $14,700,000 non-Federal) 1 Oct 92 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Limited Reevaluation Report was ongoing and draft LCA is being negotiated. Both will be submitted in June 1994. HF. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about iver mile 123 and extends upstream to Espafiola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 32-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 32-D on existing project and Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espaiiola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espaiiola nor Santa Clara Pueblo have given any indication that they plan any positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $429,900 flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1993. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1993 amounted to $45,401,000. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 7,210 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on May 30, 1993. The peak at San Acacia was 7,020 c.f.s. on June 7, 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was initiated on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1989. The Espafiola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 11G. SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Location. The project is located along the Rio Grande, extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. Proposed project. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction of 55 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $57,600,000 ($50,400,000 Federal and $7,200,000 non- Federal) 1 Oct 93 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified the Local Sponsor's required contribution. 11H. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. This project is located on Cuchillo Negro Creek in the vicinity of the city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948 and 1950, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande in lieu of the originally authorized floodway. The project has been constructed at an estimated total cost of $17,200,000 ($12,910,000 Federal and $3,400,000 Non-Federal) 1 October 1991 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of this unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project was completed in July 1991. 12. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined 32-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 72,860 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of tho Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. . For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,745.00 feet with storage of 97,056 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 110,847 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1993 was 4,744.12 acre-feet with a storage of 93,815 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,746.21 feet with a storage of 101,529 acre-feet on June 21, 1993. There was 1,447 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. No flood damages were prevented in FY 1993. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $162,100. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 9,170 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $172,800 with an accumulative total of $2,126,100 through FY 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 13. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River about 161 miles above itsjunction with the Arkansas River. The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,800 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir provides for storage of 63,698 acre-feet for flood control, 37,325 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 125,523 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1992 the pool elevation was 6,144.47 feet with a corresponding storage of 4,847 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,183.50 feet with a corresponding storage of 24,227 acre-feet on June 22, 1993. On September 30, 1993 the pool elevation was 6,178.61 feet with a corresponding storage of 20,811 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1993 was 232 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1993 was $55,200. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,279,800. Irrigation benefits for FY 1993 were $55,200. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1993 were $1,571,900. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 14,050 acre-feet. 32-9 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in May 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 14. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two dams: Diamond "A" and Rocky. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 600 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 163,775 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1992. There were no flood damages prevented during 1993. Sediment damages prevented were $62,300. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1993 were $85,001,100. There were 556 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1993. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1993 are $1,079,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. The projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1993 were $137,288. 16. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet solely for flood control. The 53,571 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1992 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 29,863 acre-feet at elevation 9,998.43 feet. Maximum storage of 53,891 acre-feet at elevation 10,027.92 feet occurred on June 30, 1993. On September 30, 1993, storage was 43,003 acre-feet at elevation 10,015.56 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,230 c.f.s. on May 27, 1993. There were $431,500 in flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1993. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $4,939,000. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers during FY 1993 was $16,885. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1992 was 103,723 acre-feet, elevation 32-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 4,834.91 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 195,290 acre-feet at elevation 4,864.02 feet on April 10, 1993. Storage on September 30, 1993 was 115,546 acre-feet at elevation 4,839.30 feet. There were $496,000 flood damages prevented in FY 1993. Total flood damages prevented to date are $4,096,000. Total cost for FY 1993 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $17,654. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1992 was 21,501 acre-feet at elevation 4,251.22 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1993 was 44,478 acre-feet at elevation 4,261.25 feet on June 24, 1993. Storage on September 30, 1993 was 35,389 acre-feet at elevation 4,257.83 feet. Total cost for FY 1993 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $37,452. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 square miles. Storage on October 1, 1992 was 1,578,500 acre-feet, elevation 6,077.23 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1993 was 1,634,400 acre-feet, elevation 6,080.96 feet on September 15, 1993. Storage on September 30, 1993 was 1,624,800 acrefeet, elevation 6,080.32 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1993 activity was $16,089. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, Fish and Wildlife and Recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,700 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1993, the storage was 17,155 acre-feet at elevation 3,242.61 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1993 activity was $24,086. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1993 were: Canon City, CO, $7,711; Kings Arroyo, CO, $19,666; Kistenmacher Arroyo, U.HGTS, SD., Las Cruces, NM, $28,138; Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM, -$477; Oak Creek, Florence, CO, $6,175; Rio Ruidoso Village, NM, $28,403; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $147,066. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) There were no Federal costs in FY 1993 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Alameda Street, Santa Fe, NM, -$4,662; Pifion Bridge, Fountain Creek, CO, $37; Camino Alire Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $69,609; Hampton Arroyo at McCoy Street, Aztec, NM; $209,702; Highway 62 Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $32,884; Highway 75, Embudo Creek, Rio Arriba, NM, $34,933; 1-25 Fountain Creek, Security, CO, $35; Isidro Road, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $33,295; Overton Road, Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO, $7,376; Pump Station at the Rio Fernando de Taos, Taos, NM, $7,053; State Highway 194, Bents Old Fort, Arkansas Road, La Junta, CO, $5,153; Southern Boulevard, Black's Arroyo, Rio Rancho, NM, $38,179; State Road 12, Starkweather Road, Reserve, NM, $155,709; and State Road 44 at Rio Salado, San Ysidro, NM, $19,995. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) There were no costs during FY 1993. 32-11 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $656,402 for flood damage prevention studies, $151,015 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $227,049 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $13,512. 21. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES Environmental Data Study costs for FY 1993 were $10,780. 22. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Continuation of Planning and Engineering costs in FY 1993 were $14,666. 23. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and Design Costs $190,140. TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Proiect Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sept. 30, 1993 1. Acequias Irrigation New Work 2. 3. 4. System, NM Alamogordo, NM Alamosa, CO Cochiti Wetfields, NM Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 200,000 1,972,000 851,000 1,323,966 1,403,995 1,245,399 155,641 299,233 364,930 230,000 209,013 259,000 242,776 15,939 241,000 250,751 270,000 268,438 300,000 206,200 808,000 7,509,0001 1,054,199 6,649,772' 202,000 2,461,000 198,776 2,426,301 205,000 204,681 734,0002 715,8952 1,718,000 2,768,0003 106,899 1,059,7393 32-12 for FY 1993 were ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) See Section In Text Proie 5. Albu Dive Proje (Fed 6. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost 6ct querque rsion Channels xct, NM eral Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) Conchas Lake, NM El Paso, TX Fountain Creek Pueblo, CO John Martin Reservoir 8. 9. 10. Puerco River, Gallup, NM V on FY 91 FY 9. pty 9o to Sent 10 -1o i - I- A. -AV --V -A .4 -G -- %-% I- J 1 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 181,000 111,811 95,000 88,537 - 17,845,450 81,669 17,688,129 518,356 518,356 854,664 854,664 13,821,4994 13,821,4994 894,725 942,571 3,483,000 1,276,426 200,000 367,812 879,000 1,044,000 827,000 18,704,519 891,397 901,113 959,639 18,674,235 2,138,000 6,095,000 3,590,000 75,266,2945 4,869,596 6,021,890 3,494,007 78,016,4015 160,000 7,463 190,341 114 6,570,0006 6,564,3996 - - - - 15,555,3587 - - - 15,555,3587 1,297,295 1,687,400 1,527,826 1,673,000 23,792,218 1,259,238 1,738,677 1,460,533 1,648,419 23,765,796 1,434,000 225,000 3,277,977 758,598 22,745 1,134 4,701,000 '9 4,678,23989 32-13 n....Iu , REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding .FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sept. 30, 1993 11. Rio Grande Basin, NM Abiquiu Dam, NM Cochiti Lake, NM Galisteo Dam, NM Jemez Canyon Dam, NM Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint1 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. NM Cost - - - 26,745,028 - - - 26,745,028 2,434,626 1,035,000 1,550,100 1,302,000 28,950,253 2,128,878 1,216,334 1,618,868 1,351,351 28,938,732 - - 128,000 96,956,559 - - - 128,000 96,956,559 1,159,945 1,587,000 1,791,900 1,604,000 19,541,967 1,065,137 1,540,779 1,699,299 1,771,798 19,474,177 14,275,053 14,275,053 179,948 164,243 193,000 209,635 171,000 162,257 202,000 2,723,924 194,029 2,706,497 6,293,972 6,293,972 635,281 575,245 10,000 25,631 430,000 489,518 50,000 40,697 723,000 458,915 200,000 132,037 554,000 8,537,632 725,083 8,442,490 422,000 1,859,00010 416,988 1,776,72210 Rio Grande Floodway New Work Approp. Cost Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM Rio Grande Floodway T or C Unit, NM New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 317,000 359,626 351,000 380,527 3,600,000 4,042,000 4,575,047 5,219,452 450,000 389,372 180,000 573,136 225,000 2,222,00012 177,380 2,224,75212 - 13,005,00013-14 53,156 12,933,425 3-14 32-14 11A. 11B. 11C. SID. liE. IIF. I IG. IIH. 4,794,86811 4,794,868" ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) See Section In Tve* COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 iintI;n, FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Total Cost to FY 93 Sent 30 1993 12. Santa Rosa Dam & Lake, NM 13. Trinidad Lake, CO 14. Two Rivers Dam, NM New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -1,821 597,936 505,525 41,039,741 41,039,056 787,000 870,253 769,000 754,693 770,000 8,030,136 740,879 7,977,370 55,774,758 55,774,758 519,429 464,825 465,000 514,772 557,000 523,991 331,000 7,016,529 346,159 6,991,689 4,847,244 4,847,244 246,409 ,),7 n.7 418,000 161-955 171,000 224,000 4,043,722 917 1 1n A ()"7 R so 'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY, 1986. include non-Federal contributions of $1,529,000. 'PED activities were initiated in FY 1991. 3Includes $750,000 FY 88 Construction General Funds and $300,000 O&M funds, added in FY 1992. 4Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 'Does not include non-Federal contributions of $1,130,000. 6Does not include non-Federal contributions of $1,295,000. 7Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 8Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. Does not include $1,397,000 non-Federal contribution. 9FY 1986 PED funds were appropriated to and expended by Los Angeles District. "oIncludes $1,177,000 PED funds. "Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espafiola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement between that agency and the Corps. '2 Includes $1,658,000 PED funds. 3Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through GI appropriations. "'Does not include non-Federal contributions of $3,425,000. 32-15 I -- I --- ' ~A L r IVICIL a A, /, I I IV() I - v.J 1 Z .0 a-, - 4,.J 1 2 Z, I -Y Z, I I , I IV -tVL I '00L clll omn~sa REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section T, Tv t I A 1. 32-16 -- nII 3. 4. 7. 8. 10. Date Authorizing Act Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 31, 1992 Aug. 26, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Project and Work Authorized ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canals. ALAMOSA, COLORADO Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. COCIIITI WETFIELDS, NEW MEXICO Authorized and directed the construction of an underground drainage system necessary to correct the high ground water problem at the Pueblo de Cochiti. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Channel improvements and levee construction on both sides of Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Channel rectifications, improvement of existing levees and construction of new levees on both sides of Rio Puerco in the city of Gallup, NM. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 101) Public Law 102-358 102d Cong, (H.R. 4437) H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1Ist sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong. 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. ALBUQUERQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 Oct. 31, 1992 RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Albuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the date of enactment of this Act. The project shall include the establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San' Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. 32-17 H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., Ist sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 102(e)) IIE. I1F. 11G. REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Proiect and Work Authorized Documents I 1H. Jun. 30, 1948 TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM H. Doc. 243, 81st Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth Cong., 1st sess. in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan H. Doc. 243, 81st approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, Cong., 1st sess. at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. Nov. 17, 1986 Modify previous authorizations to provide that the Secretary is Public Law 662, authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek 99th Cong., 2nd in lieu of the authorized floodway. sess. (Sec 871) 'Contains latest published maps. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM TABLE 32-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espaiiola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,397,0961 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 . - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway to 3941 enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. 32-18 AIBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Pro-j ect Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico Alpine, Texas 3 Cibolo Creek, Texas' Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' Highway 12, Colorado' Holly, Colorado' Las Animnias, Colorado 2 Las Cnruces, New Mexico 2 Pecos, Texas' Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico 3 Smith Creek, Colorado' orro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande New Mexico' Comnpleted. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3'Inactive. 4Deferred. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1966 1977 1983 1959 1952 1985 1985 1980 1980 1977 1954 1983 1985 1965 Cost to September 30, 1990 Construction 189,356 130,488 829,500 Operation & Maintenance 881,262 219,789 120,500 2,021,400 4,956,000 4,815,236 480,273 130,678 201,958 1,123,900 219,000 2.259.328 32-19 -- LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the Ocean that are in California between the Mexican northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 Miles north in southern Nevada and southeastern California;and the of the entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. LA-LB Harbor (LA Harbor), CA 3. Marina Del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA 7. Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA 8. Port Hueneme, CA 9. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 10. San Diego Harbor, CA 11. San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA 12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 13. San Luis Rey River, CA 14. Surfside, Sunset & Newport Beach, CA 15. Ventura Harbor, CA Flood Control 16. Alamo Dam, AZ 17. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 18. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 19. Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (Stage 2) 20. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (& Review) 21. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 22. Pine & Mathews Cnyns Dam, CO Rvr Bsn, NV 23. Santa Ana Mainstem, CA (&Review) 24. Santa Ana River Basin & Orange County, CA 25. Sepulveda Dam, CA 26. Whitewater River & Floodwarning, San Bernadino & Riverside County, CA 27. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ Page 33-02 33-02 33-02 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-07 33-06 33-07 33-07 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-09 33-09 33-09 Basic Data & Surveys 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projets 29. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 30. Flood Control work under Special Authorization 31. Surveys 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data 33. Continuation of Planning & Engineering 34. Advance Engineering & Design Preconstruction, Engineering & Design 35. Carneros Creek, CA 36. Clifton, AZ 37. Hansen Dam, CA 38. Holbrook, AZ 39. Lake Elsinore, CA 40. Lower Mission Creek 41. Lower Santa Cruz, AZ 42. Nogales Wash, AZ 43. Rillito, AZ 44. Santa Paula Creek, CA 45. Sweetwater River Basin, CA 46. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV Tables Table 33-A Table 33-B Table 33-C Table 33-D Table 33-E Table 33-F Table 33-G Cost and Financial Statement Authorizing Legislation Other Authorized Navigation Projects Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects 33-1 Page 33-09 33-09 33-09 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-10 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-13 33-13 33-13 33-14 33-19 33-31 33-31 33-32 33-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location: On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202). Existing project: For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Location cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Post dredge survey performed Feb 93. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS (LA HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. Previous projects. For details see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report 1984. Existing project. The recommended Federal project will include project increments 2 through 5 for the Port of Los Angeles. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development act. The revised recommended project has changed due to the withdraw of the Port of Long Beach on 1 Oct 91. The Port of Los Angeles might receive credit, contingent upon the Secretary of the Army's approval for advance work performed per WRDA 88. Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, if which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest, In Long Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, if which 51,775 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy Mole, exclusive of finger piers. The Final report presented & recommended four project increments. Increment No. 2 would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a south channel to provide access to the eastern side of Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 & 5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide access to container terminals that would be located on part of Pier 300 and pier 400. The material obtained from the dredging will be used to create new landfill within the port and shallow water habitat for the least tern. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition fair. Last Hydro Survey of LA River Estuary Mar 93. Last Hydro Survey of East Basin Channel Jan 93. Model studies to determine channel safety, cost allocation, and other factors have commenced at WES. Chiefs Report signed 24 Nov 93 and forwarded to ASA(CW). 3. MARINA DEL REY, CA. Location. Marina Del Rey is located on Santa Monica Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay . Existing project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperations. Fully complied with. County of Los Angeles requested a new study and localsupport expressed by letter to CESPL dated 5 Aug 92. Terminal facilities. There areover 6,000 berths servicing recreational craft within the Harbor and 28 additional transient slips located at Chace Park. A Coast Guard Station with a permanently assigned 82- foot cutter; a firefighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, a ladder truck; and a Sheriff's Harbor Patrol with five patrol boats and five auxiliary vessels are on 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 24-hour duty. A fuel dock is located on the west side of the main channel. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 740 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two haul-out yards, one containing a 100-ton and a 60-ton marine travel lift. Six hotels, 14 public parking lots, 26 restaurants, 19 apartment complexes, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, five coffee shops, and eight yacht clubs called the marina home port. Also included are sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, harbor tours, sportfishing, yacht clubs, and retail facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is poor. Hydro Survey performed Mar 93. Severe shoaling within existing navigation channels threaters existing and future navigation within the harbor. Due to the proximity of the Ballona Creek flood control channel, the materials composing the shoaled area are contaminated, creating a potentially hazardous, problematic, and costly maintenance scenario. A dragging project was performed in FY93 which relocated some of the shoaled material. Survey indicates shoaling has again occurred around the jetty tips. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387). Existing Project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. The City of Morro Bay signed a FCSA 1 Sep 88. Letter of intent dated 1 Aug 91. Model PCA submitted to sponsor Dec 93. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during the fiscal year. Project condition fair. Pre-dredge Survey performed Dec 93. Performed maintenance dredging Jan 94. Draft Design memorandum completed and submitted to SPD 29 Oct 93. Supplemental EA in progress. 5. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR (& REVIEW), CA. Location. 40 miles southeast of Los Angeles. Existing Project. Provides rubblemound entrance jetties, 920-foot deep & 500 foot wide entrance channel & main channel, inner channels, a turning basin, & anchorage areas. Upper Newport is a shallow 800 acre Marine Estuary. All are maintained by SPL. Pursuant to Sec 841 & subject to Sec 903 (b) of WRDA, 1 986 the project for navigation for the Harbor is modified to dredge and maintain a 250-foot wide channel in Upper Newport Bay to boundary of Upper Newport Bay State Ecological Preserve to a depth of S5-feet. Local Cooperation. Orange County by letter dated 25 March 87. Letter of support dated 3 March 93. Operation during fiscal year. Project condition is adequate. Hydro Survey performed Oct 93. Repairs programed, but not funded. Reconnaissance Study initiated FCSA to be signed Apr 94. 6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Oceanside Small Harbor Craft District sent letter of support dated Apr 85 & Letter of intent March 89. LCA executed Jan 93. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a hotel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Navigation improvements include initial new dredging & bi-annual dredging of expanded entrance channel area. Operations during the fiscal year. Project condition is good, except for minor repairs required for south jetty; Hydro Survey performed Jan 94. Maintenance dredging has removed major portion of the shoal, it began in Nov 93 and completed Dec 93. Rockwork contract completion rescheduled to Jun 94 due to shoaling which occurred in fall 93. O&M Manual Update needed prior to final transfer & acceptance of project. No Manual exist but plans to be developed & completed by Aug 94. 7. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along Oceanside Beach near Jetty, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping system with het pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to downcoast beaches, on a continual basis. Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and successfully tested. Phase II evaluation was prepared after data was available from the first full year of Phase II operation (Sept 92). Final completion (Phase Ill) is scheduled for FY94 and will be designed to maximize the system's production, complete the experiment, and evaluate the ultimate effeteness that the bypassing technology has on maintaining the harbor channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. We have currently been asked to further evaluate the compatibility of the Bypass system with the authorized Harbor Improvement Project before finalizing the Evaluation Report. Operation during fiscal year. Completed Phase II Testing & Operation & Phase III Evaluation in FY93. Phase Iii funding for design has been provided. City approved Phase III alternatives. Final supplemental Evaluation Report of current system document the technical lessons to date & recommends termination of project after Phase II, because the system was no longer cost effective as compared to the future dredging program at Oceanside. 8. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing project. Authorized in 1970 for restudy of completed project. The harbor serves both military and commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, wharves, and warehouses servicing a wide variety of products. The existing Federal project consists of an approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and two rubblemound jetties. The Navy has plans to utilize the harbor more extensively for vessel berthing & repair; effectely reducing maneuverability in the harbor. Harbor District would like to use deeper draft wood pulp carrier vessels & possibly tankers. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard Harbor District expressed their continued strong support of the study 15 Dec 93. Operations during the fiscal year. Project condition fair. Hydro Survey performed Feb 93. Latest inspection indicated some damages at the East and West Jetties. Reconnaissance study was initiated May 93, completion scheduled for Aug 94. 9. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California on the southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. WRDA of 86 (H.R. 6) Conference Bill, Title VIII - Project Modification, Sec 809 - King Harbor, Redondo Beach, CA modifies the King Harbor project in order to carry out maintenance dredging & for breakwater construction, & authorized the Secretary to 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT restore the breakwater to a height of 22-ft & maintain breakwater at such height to provide greater protection from heavy wave action. Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are in full support of the study and have indicated desire to construct improvements to reduce continued storm related damages. Operations during fiscal year. Project Condition good. Repairs to Breakwater with modifications was completed Sep 92. 10. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is good. Condition Survey of the Harbor was completed Sep 93. Comprehensive Survey rescheduled for FY 95. 11. SAN DIEGO RIVER & MISSION BAY, CA Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean, 6 miles northwest of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. The Bay has a perimeter of about 11 miles and area of about 2,400 acres. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual report for 1991. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944, the existing project consists of a leveed channel, entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, Anchorage Basins (West Anchorage & Quivira) and three jetties. Re-evaluation of constructing a WEIR in middle jetty. This WEIR is to resore design conveyance capacity at the mouth of the San Diego River. A sand plug in mouth of river reduced flood carrying capability. Local cooperation. Letter dated February 1989 from the city of San Diego stated desire to proceed on weir based on cost-sharing requirements of WRDA 86. The City desires Federal assistance for improvements to reduce storm damage potential and shore erosion in Mission Bay area. Operations during the fiscal year. Project condition is fair with some subsidence of the revetments at Hospitality Point, Mission Point & the deterioration of the Timber Pile Breakwater. Repairs funded for FY94. New disposal location for rock removed from middle jetty required supplemental EA & approvals from resource agencies & CA Coastal Commission. 12. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. Existing Project. For details on original, see page 33-4 Annual Report for 1983. For re-evaluation details see WRDA, 1986. Recommended plan includes acquiring a permanent dredge for the City and they will assume the operation & maintenance of the channel. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. The City reaffirmed its support 3 Aug 93. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is fair. Hydro Survey performed March 93. Maintenance dredging started Feb 94. Funds for PED were appropriated in FY91; however, the feasibility phase was not completed until 17 Sep 93. PMP submitted Oct 93, currently under review. PED initiated in Oct 93. 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 13. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the river, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. Local cooperation. Fully complied with by the City of Oceanside. Operations during fiscal year. Levee construction in Reach 2 & 3 were 90% complete at the time of the Jan-Feb storms. Approximately $20M were prevented to Los Arbolitos area & overall floodplain. Project partner and local community commended Corps' efforts. Construction was completed in Sep. The Contractor did not meet schedule for three removal - Corps successuflly negiotiated 2 month extension of the environmental window from 15 Mar to 15 May to allow work to be completed. 14. SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, CA Location. Project extends along Orange County Coast, 17 miles, from San Gabriel River mouth downcoast to Newport Bay Harbor entrance. Existing project. Authorization Sec 101 of Rivers and Harbors Act 1962. Project is an indefinite continuing construction project. Local cooperation. State of CA, Orange County, Cities of Newport and Huntington Beach, and Surfside Colony. Letter of intent dated Dec 93 sent thru coordinating sponsor State of CA Dept of Boating & Waterways. Operations during fiscal year. Beach replenishment will arrest continuing erosion of shoreline in the project area for approximately 5 years, last replenishment Nov 90. To date, eight groins have been built and 16,515,000 cubic yeards of sand have been placed along Surfside- Sunset & Newport Beach areas. 15. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and 6 miles northwest of Channel Island Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Re-evaluation under WRDA 1990 consists of modification to the exiting harbor by constructing a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty, and deepening and extending the entrance channel and sand trap. Local cooperation. Ventura Port District executed LCA, Apr 93. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is fair. Hydro Survey began Apr 93. Repairs to the detached breakwater will be completed in FY94. Dredging began Oct 93 & completed Nov 93. Removal of abandoned Unocal pipelines began in Jul 93, however; shoaling prevented complete removal of required sections until after dredging was completed. Sections of the pipelines were removed sufficient enough to allow new dredging to be completed, but there still is a possibility that some sections may remain that could pose a problem during future O&M dredging. FLOOD CONTROL 16. ALAMO DAM, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ on the Bill Williams River, AZ a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition if good. Follow up repair work including a system for putting the Bulkhead Gate in place without using a bardge is underway as of Mar 94. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 17. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In and near the cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Ca. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1987. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Annual Report for 1981. 18. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ. Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 120 miles southwest of Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is fair; repair of damages caused by spillway flow in Jan 93 were completed in Jan 94. Additional areas of repair such as gaging station & outlet tunnel remain to be engineered & are not funded. Funds have been requested from OCE. 19. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (STAGE 2). Location: Project located in Maricopa County, AZ, adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project: For details see Annual Report FY91 page 33-7. Map of Modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No.3, General Design Memorandum- Phase I, plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," Prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1981. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2 detention basins and recreation facilities; ACDC, 16.5 miles long of which 4,3000 Lf will be covered at Paradise Valley & Alta Vista (locals withdrew support for Central Ave), total levees about 4.0 miles, flowage easement about 19.5 miles long; 3.1 mile channel along new & Agua Fria River's; & bank stabiliztion about 2.2 miles along Skunk Creek & New River. Local Cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 Annual Report for 1981. LCA relating to covered channel executed 8 July 92 by Flood Control District of Maricopa County.. Operations during fiscal year. Covered Channel: modification directed by National Defense Authority Act 92-93 to mitigate damage caused by construction of project by covering 3 segments of ACDC; work will be completed on 2 segments March 94, 3rd segment withdrawn by locals. Heavy rains in July of 92 cuased some damage to ACDC. Most damage occurred on north side between Central Ave & 7th St. Some deflection of wall occurred, and some base of maintence road washed away with accompanying collapse of asphalt pavement, cause, due in part, to a storm drain pipe flowing full, that disconnected from wall. A change order for necessary repairs was issued in 93 & will be completed in 94. Project is approximately 99% complete. 20. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, (& REVIEW) CA Location: Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Compton Creek, CA. Previous Project: For Details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1942; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. For details on units see Annual Report for 1962. For details on re-evaluation see Annual Report for 1991. Authorized WRDA 1990 Sec 101.B; Chief of Engineers Report 4 June 92. Existing project: Project will consist of channel improvement to Lower Los Angeles & Rio Hondo Rivers & Compton Creek & modification/replacement of as many as 27 Bridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Local cooperation: The Los Angeles County department of Public Works has actively participated in extensive briefings for Rep of Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and most of the affected Congressmen. They reaffirmed support Feb 92. Operations during fiscal year. Condition of dams & channels good. Model tests are (underway at WES) critical to schedule determining overall plan. Preliminary results of Reach 1 of model testing indicate a $60M savings in bridges modifications. Additional environmental document will be required for sponsor to meet state CEQA requirements. Sponsor has determined that EIR is required to meet CEQA. EIR will be prepared by sponsor as a non-federal cost. Compton Creek DM completed Dec 93, channel DM started June 93. 21. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location: On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project: For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition good. Local agencies have recently indicated interest in O&M recreational development immediately upstream & downstream of the dam. This will help considerably in controlling access. There has been extensive defacto off road vehicle use both upstream & downstream sides of dam. 22. PINE AND MiATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location: In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project: For details, see page 33-1 3 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Structures in good condition. They are ungated & require little maintenance. 23. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, please see Page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Plan of improvement: Seven Oaks Dam, management of overflow area - Seven Oaks to Prado; raise Mill Creek Levee; additional storage at Prado; improvements along: Oak St. Drain/Riverside Co., Santiago Creek/Orange Co., & Lower Santa Ana River; recreation development: mitigation & preservation; and San Timoteo. Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. LCA signed 14 Dec 89. Operations during fiscal year. Jan & Feb storms delayed contruction for Rch 2 & outlet works & rockfall in gate chamber Feb 93. Late start on oak St. (upper & lower) resulted in less placement. Protest by second low bidder delayed award of Seven Oaks Embankment contract. Construction completed on LSAR Rch 1 & 10, 10 Jul 93, continue construction on Rch 2, Oak St. (lower) and Seven Oaks Div. Tunnel. Initiated construction LSR Rch 3 & 4 Apr 93 & Oak St. (Upper), Jun 93. E&D continues on LSAR, Santiago Creek, Prado Dam & San Timoteo Ck. LCA HTW Clause revision signed by local sponsors & DE as authorized by ASA(CW). 24. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA. Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Orange County Water District advocated an increase in water conservation at Prado Dam up to elevation 505'. Prado Basin includes significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the endangered least Bell's vireo. The Basin is currently under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. Operations during fiscal year. The conditions of dams and channels is good. 25. SEPULVEDA DAM, CA Location. The project is located between the communities of Encino and Van Nuys, 15 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Flood Control Act 1936 & Public Law 77-387 1941, & PL 89-72. Primary project purpose is flood control. Subsequent Act of Congress authorized a secondary project purpose for park & recreation. Local cooperation. The facilities will be constructed with Federal funds; the City of Los Angeles will match the federal funds by developing the water distribution system from the Tillman Reclamation plant to the lake. Construction will include the following; a comfort station, irrigation system, gates and barricades signs, grading and land form, trails, fencing, and benches. Operations during fiscal year. Private conservation groups keep constant watch & desire that remaining agricultural areas be dedicated to wildlife. LCA & finance plan submitted and approved by HQUSACE and OASA(CW). Initiated construction Jun 93. 26. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN FLOODWARNING SYSTEM, CA Location. The Coachella Valley area of San Bernadino and Riverside Counties, about 100 miles east of the city of Los Angeles. Existing project. Rain and stream gages have been installed in appropriates locations in the Whitewater River tributary basin. Receiving and processing stations are operational at two local emergency agency offices. Local cooperation. The Coachella Valley Water District signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Installation of Equipment complete. 27. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. 50 miles SE of Phoenix, AZ in Pinal County, on Queen Creek, AZ a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details see pg 33-10 of Annual Report 1981. Project element earthfill Dam, circular conduit outlet works & reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project is in good condition. The structure in ungated & required little maintenance. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of 22 completed & 2 partially completed flood control projects consisting of the following: 375 miles of Channels, 6 Dams & Appurtenances & 23 Debris Basins. Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $678,419. 29. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. Cost for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $119,549. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $104,406. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $137,661 for advance mobilization preparation & $39,492 for disaster reparedness program. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90- 448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. Total reimbursable $811,627. 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $4,143,908 regular funds, of which $517,970 was for Navigation Studies; $2,111,436 was for Flood Damage Prevention Studies; $625,747 was for Shoreline Protection Studies; $625,889 was for Special Studies, $636 was for Review of Authorized Projects, $174,413 was for Miscellaneous Activities, and $87,817 was for Coordination Studies with other agencies. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $258,388 of which $251,563 were for Flood Plain Management and $6,825 went for Hydrologic Studies. 33. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING. Fiscal year cost was $5,168,781 of which $1,904,605 was for Channel and Harbors and $3,264,176 was for Flood Control Projects. 34. ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $5,688,252 of which $289,426 was for Sub-C Channels and Harbors and $5,398,825 was for Flood Control Projects. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 35. CARNEROS CREEK, CA Location. Located in Goleta Valley area, 6 miles west of Santa Barbara, and 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Description. Carneros Creek is one of several streams in the 48-square mile area of Goleta Valley which flow from southern slopes of Santa Ynez Mountains through residential, commercial and industrial areas of the Goleta Valley, converging in the Goleta Slough before flowing into the Pacific Ocean at Goleta Beach property to be protected is primarily industrial. Local cooperation. Santa Barbara Co. Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Under WRDA of 1992 H.R. 6167, the recommended project consists of an offline excavated debris basin in combination with a diversion channel connecting to an existing borrow pit that will be modified slightly to become a detention basin north of U.S. Highway 101. Operations during fiscal year. Project overflow analysis requires re-evaluation. Sensitivity analysis completed 31 Jan 94. Letter forwarded to sponsor that project is no longer justified PM preparing correspondence. 36. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Clifton is in Greenlee County, AZ, about 170 miles northeast of Tucson. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates and bridge modifications. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation' plans, and recreation development. Local cooperation. The State of Arizona Division of Emergency Services is the local sponsor. LCA executed 30 Jul 93. Authorized WRDA of 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Southern Pacific RR is 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT still not processing agreement for the crossing & floodgates in a timely manner. Sponsor is setting up a meeting with elected officials to attempt to resolve this issue. They are also preparing for condemnation, as a fall-back plan. Final GDM approved Apr 93. Delay in Real Estate acquisition. 37. HANSEN DAM, CA Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles. 20 miles northwest of Downtown Los Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within Flood Control Basin boundaries. Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 847 Energy & Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102-104). Proposed plan is to construct a 15-acre recreation lake, picnic facilities, access roads and parking lots. The lake and recreational facilities will be constructed with full Federal funding with royalties earned from the sale of Debris removal from the basin. The city of Los Angeles will construct remaining facilities. Local cooperation. The City of Los Angeles will be independently funding and constructing portions of the lake development; no LCA needed. An agreement will be needed between the Corps and the City, for the City to operate and maintain the facilities. The City will provide remining facilities (water supply & treatment), that will be necessary for the lake to be useable. Operations during fiscal year. Debris removal license expired Oct 93. Contractor claims to have been promised an additional two years. The issue remains unresolved & the contractor remains in the Basin & SPD requested that the FDM be submitted with the Project Cooperation Agreement as a support document. Master Plan completed. Feature Design Memorandum and Plans and Specifications completed. SPL revising the PCA for downsizing the project to keep with in the appropriated funding. 38. HOLBROOK, AZ Location. In the city of Holbrook, AZ, about 1 50 miles northeast of Phoenix. Existing project. The plan will provide 100-year-flood protection by raising and extending the existing Corps of Engineers levee on the north side of the Little Colorado River, building a ring levee around the McLaws area, relocating residents of the south bank flood plain east of the Apache Railroad, acquisition of ponding areas and wildlife mitigation. It is the NED plan. The authorized plan is a double levee offering SPF protection. Local cooperation. The City of Holbrook signed the LCA 24 Aug 93. Operations during fiscal year. Completion of PED Sep 93. Real Estate acquisition was initiated in Oct 93. 39. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the city of Corona. Existing project. The plan consists of an earthen-trap outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30-foot to 80-foot base and IV on 3H side slopes. Will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level in the downtown area, as well as around the perimeter of the lake. The final plan includes building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District signed a Local Cooperation Agreement on 27 March 92. Operations during fiscal year. Prehistoric human remains were found at the archaelogical site. The Native Americans obtained a temporary restraining order on the site, which has now been lifted. Additional monitoring & reporting to the Native Americans informed is required. Fish & Wildlife has requested revisions to the mitigation kind & work restrictions as a result of a site visit. This request is being discussed with F&W to avoid changes to the construction. 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 40. LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA Location. In Santa Barbara County, about 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. The project is designed to prevent 100-year flood damages. The recommended plan, authorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1988, consists of approximately 1.2 miles of concrete channelization for lower portion of Mission Creek, including 6 Bridge replacements. Local cooperation. Local Sponsor is Santa Barbara Co. Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Sponsor reaffirmed support by letter Jun 91. Operations during fiscal year. Hydraulic analysis show too much sedimentation will occur during peak flows, thus not allowing for construction of 100-yr level of protection without a debris basin. Corps sent letter to sponsor & DE met with county Supervisors/City Council in Sep 93 discussing issue. Sponsor established "Concensus group" to determine course of action. No consensus reached in Nov & sponsor is selecting A/E to assist in recommendation. 41. LOWER SANTA CRUZ, AZ Location. Study area in lower reach of Santa Cruz River in Pinal County about 50 miles south Phoenix, AZ and lies between town of Red Rock and confluence of Gila River. Damage area is experiencing accelerated urbanization as a result of growth pressure from the Phoenix and Tucson metro areas. Local cooperation. Authorized under Flood Control Act 28 June 38 (Gila River & Tribs). Local Sponsor Pinal County Flood Control District reaffirmed support in letter dated 26 Oct 93. Operations during fiscal year. Serious geotech problems found in much of study area - requires rescoping of study to avoid these areas. Local sponsor reviewing technical documentation for supplemental effort. Pinal County Board of Supervisors passed resolution to continue study 7 Dec 92. SPL & SPD coordinating plan formulation & economic issues. 42. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Plans include a lateral collector channel to capture Overland Street flow and divert it into the existing covered channels; a 3,300-foot-long grouted stone/concrete channel system in the Chula Vista community; and a flood warning system and recreation component associated with Chula Vista channels. Current plan includes a interceptor channel & levee at Chula Vista & a floodwarning system in Mexico & United States. Local cooperation. The Santa Cruz Flood Control District has signed a cost-sharing agreement. Operation during fiscal year. Flood warning system installation not yet approved by Mexico; without - less than 6 hours warning time. Mexico considering improvements to East Channel lateral collector - Corps progress on hold. State certification for Section 404 (b) (1) required prior to construction was approved 30 March 1993. 43. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Location. The north & east portions of Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Plan of improvement includes: building a soil cement for bank erosion control and grade-control structures in the channel bottom to prevent degradation along 13.2 miles of the river. Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6. 1987. PCA to be executed in Apr 94. Operation during fiscal year. Local sponsor has completed approx. 11 miles, additional to the 12 miles, of soil cement bank protection & has been approved for credit for this work. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 44. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of the city of Santa paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and approximately 60 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1), for details see Annual Report FY91, page 33-10. Plan 3.8 miles of concrete channel & 9 debris basin on Santa Paula Creek & 0.7 miles of concrete channel & a debris basin on Mud Creek. Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control District. If a new project authorization is required as a result of the ongoing GRR process, the local sponsor will be required to cost share in accordance with WRDA 1986. Letter dated 4 Dec 86 gave support for channel removal subject to approval of flood assistance plan. Operations during fiscal year. Debris due to storms of 91-92 & 92-93 caused damage to existing phase 1 channel. First channel repair completed in May 93, second repair contract initiated Jan 94. Conference held May 93 identified some justifiable alternatives for the re-evaluation study regarding deteriorating reach of original project. 45. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA Location. Empties into San Diego Bay in the cities of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County is cost-sharing, agreement signed Dec 84. Operations during fiscal year. Contract modification was awarded in Feb 93 to accelerate completion of construction to meet environmental window which restricted construction during Sep-Mar. The construction of Sweetwater Channel was completed on 1 Sep 93. The O&M responsibility for the Sweetwater Channel was transferred to the County of San Diego Dept of Public Works on 30 Sep 93. The construction of feature 13 was completed on 30 Mar 93. The required environmental monitoring is being performed & completion is scheduled on 1 Jun 95. 46. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. West of and thru urbanized Las Vegas community along both washes. Existing project. SR Oct 82; WRDA 92, PL 102-580, 31 Oct 92 Sec 101(3). Study structural and nonstructural means of reducing flood damage and provide erosion control, water supply, recreation and enhancement. Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District reaffirmed support Jan 92. Operations during fiscal year. PCA scheduled Jul 94. Construction to initiate in FY94 33-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 Channel Islands, CA Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Model Study 3. Marina del Rey, CA (Regular Funds) 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay & Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp, Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 90,912 74,111 1,149,068 243,494 2011 479,397 394,995 270,285 205,937 2,635,000 741,600 2,202,000 33,520,314 2,635,131 760,456 2,203,111 33,520,313 132,126 876,615 1,082 863 510,000 436,874 1,823,286 1,557,846 143,394 - 143,595 761,153 490,791 785,628 478,901 150,000 210,101 409,051 145,632 1,182,500 409,430 143,394 940,444 70,000 53,942 300,000 280,000 290,568 265,900 904,942 1,697,808 694,602 298,681 129,715 2,385,889 757,268 283,011 354,000 196,691 200,000 165,197 483,482 319,366 637,909 590,619 66,498 98,937 66,499 98,937 46,000 202,734 0 32,078 1,881,341 1,869,625 2,007,468 1,699,205 650,000 610,410 3,963,459 3,555,883 400,000 399,425 557,700 554,975 390,000 2,405,000 3,344,980 300,101 848,281 1,566,685 738,007 736,834 386,600 177,114 1,829,015 1,603,504 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 90 .FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA Port Hueneme, CA 9. Redondo Beach, (King Harbor) 10. San Diego Harbor, CA 11. San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA 12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp, Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 2,757,888 1,491,309 1,464,296 860,000 1,105,237 2,729,235 1,536,676 1,046,885 114,587 69,922 188,391 168,974 15,726 24,333 163 29,637 23,092 838,165 765,948 852,000 856,184 1,682,000 185,889 7,084 5,747 71,513 71,369 103,475 87,324 942,679 831,034 831,034 865,000 -37,600 2,472 179,989 984,963 132,292 135,337 80,144 56,742 16,221 16,212 1 57,000 76,832 0 410 42,004 118,570 3,045 3,045 848,402 47,291 9 16,000 - 6,670,493 6,418,033 157,000 76,832 2,103.987 2,103,987 2,092,384 1,458,396 158,147 168,462 1,000,059 175,565 149,342 126,628 958,679 831,034 851,983 1,570,798 4,091,980 886,562 1,403,594 3,912,104 13. San Luis Rey River, CA 14. Surfside, Sunset & Newport Beach CA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 2,270,000 1,765,000 16,992,000 2,171,810 2,672,999 16,562,010 4,839,149 380,292 3,961,766 814,113 87,429 46,862 6,624,000 37,378,000 7,098,135 37,061,129 40,568 24,187 5,347,438 4,846,928 33-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF ,THE.A RMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 33-A "COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 15. Ventura Harbor (Ventura Marina), CA Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 16. Alamo Dam, AZ 17. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 18. Painted Rock, AZ (Gila Rvr) 19. Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Gila Rvr) 20. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, 21. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin 22. Pine & Mathews Canyons Dam, Colo River Basin, NV 23. Santa Ana River Mainstem Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 414,015 264,530 407,000 311,933 1,053,598 2,786,171 2,444,436 6,698,220 950,774 1,888,498 3,375,893 6,479,695 343,000 270,668 149,901 121,810 1,610,013 1,299,280 863,230 1,231,684 1,541,268 906,365 19,250 1,593 761,994 751,360 31,281,747 32,288,943 18,996 10,218 634,276 627,459 29,971,389 33,233,917 8,778 452,000 281,828 869,152 778,659 156,778 2,444 1,351,901 986,239 4,641,675 4,457,976 203,802 14,255 744,895 2,206,927 3,663,092 754,849 2,019,158 4,152,826 24,958,364 25,543,262 84,066 46,849 2,365,670 2,174,188 663,188 245,819 72,616 20,136 17,292,000 10,250,887 160,300 451,080 13,828,000 13,291,791 38,800 7,422 2,395,479 2,531,849 2,473,742 2,500,899 222,964 670,769 117,456 117,835 55,688,105 50,609,693 170,514 239,716 209,774 96,61 5 96,138 60,437,010 64,717,151 241,284 241,659 21,687 16,956 73,838,000 63,375,949 78,200 236,350,297 233,375,960 122,866 54,271 7,292,998 7,148,829 1,127,436 1,368,021 308,374 251,065 229,567,000 214,595,680 409,014 690,796 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 24. Santa Ana River Basin OC 25. Sepulveda Dam, CA 26. Whitewater River Floodwarning System, CA 35. Carneros Creek, CA 36. Clifton, AZ 37. Hansen Dam, CA Holbrook, AZ Lake Elsinore, CA Lower Mission Creek, CA Lower Santa Cruz, AZ Nogales Wash, AZ Rillito River, AZ Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,175,054 1,736,631 2,032,028 1,838,451 2,025,348 1,738,763 1,995,217 1,821,987 2,134,010 2,052,246 258,330 25,640 531,221 466,484 203,446 164,559 262,000 222.970 54,785 53,946 335,927 60,928 3,206 188,013 458,620 458,258 21 400,000 316,052 380,340 318,836 68,913 68,846 700,357 306,613 879,519 110,000 463,707 72,802 357,316 217,123 370,285 184,785 493,476 455,172 441,173 900,000 161 60,558 122,456 22 300,795 191,619 185,759 424,059 241,198 219,630 383,362 168,465 -62 1,500 7,782,164 7,581,315 2,989,115 2,693,888 261,579 213,653 1,548,068 1,357,279 1,158,475 964,077 1,230,717 756,139 957,801 723,535 1,210,648 1,564,143 55,008 55,446 33-17 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY, OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 Santa Paula Creek, CA Sweetwater River Basin, CA Tropicana/ Flamingo, NV New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 50,060 1,125 248,945 785,876 173,823 611,667 989,761 974,478 2,074,642 1,761,093 2,803.913 4,695,474 6,648,459 1,837,644 15,985,490 925,668 6,056,291 6,456,306 1,237,947 14,676,212 New Work: Approp. Cost 33-18 44. 45. 46. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 1. Sep. 3, 1954 June 3, 1896 June 25,1896 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. S.Doc.130, 71st Con.,2d sess. 33-19 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA H.Doc. 362,83d Cong., Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore 2d sess. protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH S.Doc.18,55th HARBORS, CA Cong.,1st sess. A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Ferman. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., total length of 11,152 feet from Point 1st sess. Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of Rivers and Harbors entrance channel. Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. For silt-diversion works. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles H.Doc. 1013, 66th inner harbor entrance channel. Cong.,3d sess. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet 1st sess. wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in Rivers and Harbors prolongation of existing breakwater Committee Doc.33, 71st (authorized by act of '1896). Cong., 2d sess. 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17,1940 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. 33-20 S.Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.161, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1988 Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. If non-Federal interest carry out any work associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. In analyzing costs and benefits of such project, the Secretary shall consider the costs and benefits produced by any work which is carried out under the preceding sentence by non-Federal interests and which the Secretary determines is compatible with such project. The feasibility report for such project shall include consideration and evaluation of the following proposed project features: Long Beach Main Channel, Channel to Los Angeles Pier 300, Channels to Los Angeles Pier 400, Long Beach Pier "K" Channel, and Los Angeles Crude Transshipment Terminal Channel. The Secretary is directed to perform maintenance dredging of the existing Federal project at the mouth of the Los Angeles River, CA, to the authorized depth of 20 feet for the purpose of maintaining the flood control basin and navigaton safety. 33-21 H.Doc.94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.1 Public Law 100-676 Public Law 100-676- Nov.17, 1988 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 8, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 03, 1875 Sep. 19, 1875 3. H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 4. MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels. H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions. This project is for navigation. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. OCEANSIDE SAND BYPASS, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southern-most interior channel. KING HARBOR, REDONDO BEACH, CA Provides for cost sharing in accordnace with WRDA '86. Permits construction of breakwater >22' in accordance with plans approved by Aray. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Annual Report 1973; p.1142 Sep. 19, 1890. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. 33-22 H.R.6167 H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbor Act 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbor Act 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.177, 50th Cong., 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT (Annual Report, 1888;p.2114). June 25,1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and O. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 1st session. H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 33-23 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 11. July24, 1946 12. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 13. Dec. 17, 19703 Nov. 17, 1986 14. Dec. 17, 1970 3 Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35- foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. Authorized non-Federal project cost sharing at a minimum of 25 percent and a maximum of 50 percent. SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.Doc.'760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 None S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 33-24 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1988 16. Dec. 22, 1944 17. Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 June 22, 1936 Authorized non-Federal project cost sharing at a minimum of 25 percent and a maximum of 50 percent. VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CAI Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County,CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known and designated as "Ventura Harbor". ALAMO DAM & LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. None H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676 H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. None 33-25 15. 18. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954. July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project Provision of lands, easements, and rightsof- way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. None None H.Doc.838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None 33-26 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 June 22, 1936 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under to comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Authorized modification of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements theron, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. None None None Public Law 100-676 H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. None 33-27 21. 22. 23. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY. ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 Nov. 28, 1990 Jun. 22, 1936 (amended 1937, 1941,& 1950) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in above-mentioned flood control acts. The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Saniago Creek, CA, is modified to authorized the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including flood plain management areas. SEPULVEDA DAM, CA Established the location & design of the dam & appurtenant flood control facilities. H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H.Doc.534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 1 None Public Law 74-738 33-28 25. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT July 9, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 24, 1946 Specified that recreation, fish, & wildlife enhancement are to be given full consideration in Corps of Engineers projects. It also defines the basis for the joint Federal & non-Federal sharing of financial responsibility. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. WHITEWATER RIVER & FLOODWARNING, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. EC 1130-2-121 H.Doc.148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 33-29 26. 27. 28. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Status Dana Point, Harbor, CA Marina Del Rey, Dredging Oceanside Harbor storm damage Bch Nrshment, Sunset-Surfside Ventura Harbor Navigation Completed Active Active Active Active Construction Cost FY93 6,840 1,772,000 1,552,000 Operation & Maintenance 5 9,777 TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Project Status Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange County, CA Bird Rock area, La Jolla San Diego County, CA Cabrillo Beach Coast of California, Point Mugu, to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Las Tunas Beach, San Diego Co, CA Mission Beach Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Port San Luis Shore & Bluff Erosion San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset & Newport Bch), Orange County, CA Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Active Completed Active Completed Active Active Completed Active Active Compl & deferred 33-30 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction Project Status Cost FY93 Agua Fria Rvr, Prescot Valley AZ Active 652 Allenville, AZ Completed Bear Creek, CA Active Black Creek, Ft. Defiance,AZ Active 6,945 Black Wash, AZ Active 76 Cache Creek, CA Active 422 Caliente Wash, AZ Active 10,000 Champaign Creek, CA Active 3,000 Christopher Creek, CA Active 3,000 City Creek Levee, San Completed Bernardino County, CA City of Douglas, AZ Sec 205 Active 55,768 Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Completed Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Completed Gila River Basin, AZ: Deferred Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers Levee Active and Channel Improvements Deferred Gila and San Pedro Riv, AZ Active 3,000 Goleta, CA, and Vicinity Active Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County Active Drainage Area, CA (mod) Hesperia, CA Active 50,000 Hickman Wash, Ft. Defiance, AZ Active 5,666 Ice House Canyon, AZ Active 3,000 Indian Bend Wash Completed 4,669 Lakeside, San Diego, CA Active Little Colorado River at Holbrook Holbrook Levee Little Colorado Rvr Completed Lower Gila River Levee & Inactive Channel Improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Lower Santa Cruz, AZ Active 10,000 Middle Gila River Channel Active Improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Mission Zanja, CA Active 83 Mohave Floodwarning, CA Active 315 33-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 33-E (CONT) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD Project Status Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ. Norco Bluff, CA Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA Picacho, CA Pinal Creek Channel Improvements Pine Creek, AZ Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino Co. CA Rainbow Valley, San Diego, CA Rialto Channel, CA Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA Santa Cruz, AZ Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements & Lytle Creek Levee Mill Creek Levees Riverside Levees San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA Santa Clara Rvr, Fillmore, CA Santa Maria Valley Levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek Channel & Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA Sierra Vista, AZ Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA South Fork of the Santa Clara Rvr, Santa Clarita Valley, CA Star Valley, AZ Tahquitz Creek, CA Active Active Active Completed Active Deferred Active Completed Active Active Completed Active Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Active Completed Active Active Completed Active Active Inactive CONTROL PROJECTS Construction Costs FY93 56 62 3,000 50,000 635 62 1,167 9,460 3,000 33-32 LOS ANGELES, TABLE 33-E (CONT) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction Project Status Costs FY93 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin Completed and Channel Improvements Tanque Verde, AZ Active 19,498 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Active 36,546 Vista, CA Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed Tonto Creek at Gisela, AZ Active 3,000 Tonto Creek, Punkin Center, AZ Active 3,000 Tonto Creek, Rsvlt Gdns East, AZ Active 3,000 Tucson Diversion Channel Completed Upper Sulpher Spring, CA Active 60,000 Ventura Harbor, CA Active Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon Debris Basin & Completed Channel Ventura River Levee Completed Whisperings Subdivision, AZ Active 3,000 Whitewater River, CA: Banning Levee-San Gorgonio Completed River, Riverside County Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Completed Springs Winsor Park, Las Vegas, NV Active 37,000 33-33 CA, DISTRICT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 93 TABLE 33-G D Project A Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS ate & uthority 1973 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Federal Funds Expended 1,831,300 295,191 67,361 213,313 33-34 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia- Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Oakland Harbor, CA................ 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ..... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ............... . . 34-3 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA.. 34-3 5. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA ..... 34-4 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys... 34-5 7. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .................. 34-5 8. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 Flood Control 9. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. . 34-5 10. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization..................... 34-5 Navigation 1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23. 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2,. 1945 and October 23. 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole: thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Arnmy 11. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 General Investigations Page 12. Surveys ......................... 34-5 13. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 34-5 14. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.. 34-5 Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table Table Table Table Table 34-D 34-E 34-F 34-0G 34-H Cost and Financial Statement ................ 34L-7 Authorizing Legislation .............. 34-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 34-13 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ...... 34-13 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.......... 34-14 Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 38 feet deep and 600 feet wide to Howard Terminal and 35 feet deep to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove anid Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is S 119.150,000 of which $89,360,000 is Federal cost (includes $125,000 Coast Guard cost) and S29,790.000 is non-Federal cost. Under WRDA 1986, the Bar Channel and Inner Harbor were deepened to 38 feet deep up to Howard Terminal as a separable element of the authorized 42-foot deep project. Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland has indicated its intent to sign a Project Cooperation Agreement satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dclock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Sediment testing, ocean site baseline and initial monitoring studies, preparation of SEIS draft and GDM draft. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $459,342; and operation and maintenance Oakland Inner and Outer Harbors including engineering and design with contract dredge. Remove 123,013 cubic yards of shoal material from the Inner Harbor and 108,909 cubic yards from the Outer Harbor, cost S497,883. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City' of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southhampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -35 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly apex of the bend. Thence, the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Proposed improvements consist of a construction plan involving four and one-half miles of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. The project would deepen the existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet in diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 2,000,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to aquatic and upland disposal sites, depending on the sediment quality. The estimated cost S33,050,000 of which $25,800,000 is Federal cost (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $7,250,000 is non-Federal cost. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued preconstruction planning and engineering. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Richmond Inner. Outer Harbors including engineering and design and U.S. Hopper dredge Essayons. Essayons removed 149,713 cubic yards of shoal material from Inner Harbor and 127,516 cubic yards from the Outer Harbor. cost $S1,615,766. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco. Marin. Contra Costa. and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Martinez to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Martinez; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1991) of Federal cost (Corps). see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Estimated volume of dredged material is 11 million cubic yards. Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor. Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30. revised 1991, No. 31. revised 1982, and No. 32. revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond. and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a Class A regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper. San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. A contract with U.C. Berkeley was consummated December 1991 for the joint operation and management of the physical Bay Model for a one-year period with two option years implemented for continuation of program. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model averages between 100,000 to 150,000 people. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative Association provides financial and educational support to visitor center programming. An active volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center providing approximately 80 man-days of effort monthly. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including. but not limited to: salinity intrusion, 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, and other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1993, was $24,208,823, of which $9,225,932 was for the regional visitor center, $1,288,219 for exhibits, and $13,694,672 for maintenance. 5. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation channels of the San Francisco Bay region including Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay environs. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay region has an annual disposal requirement of approximately 8 million cubic yards (mrcy) to maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a one-time new civil works requirement of approximately 16 mincy for the Oakland Harbor, Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III ship channel. In January 1990, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission convened with thirty interested agencies and organizations with concerns regarding dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. These four agencies have the responsibility for regulation of the waters of the US and California for disposal of dredged material. The four agencies and the concerned navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop technically feasible, economically prudent and environmentally acceptable long range solutions to the dredging and disposal needs for the San Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In determining acceptable dredged material disposal locations, the LTMS evaluated a broad array of potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic disposal alternatives. Local cooperation. Pursuant to their regulatory responsibilities, the Division commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission agreed to jointly undertake the development and implementation of a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of dredged materials from the region. Based on the outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission will consider modifications to the dredging elements of their respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco Bay. Terminal facilities. Besides identifying implementable disposal options, the LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional disposal policies between federal and state agencies; (2) provide a local decision-making framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) streamline existing permit and testing procedures; and (4) provide a long term site monitoring apparatus and feedback mechanism. Operations during fiscal year. The LTMS has three work groups investigating disposal options. Their progress and accomplishments for FY 1993 are listed below: (1) In-Bay Studies Work Group - A. A standard methods manual for chemical analyses was developed and is scheduled for review in FY 1994. B. Sediment toxicity contract to look at toxicity test interferences and review approaches for assessing sub-lethal, chronic sediment evaluations was continued. C. Finalization of work necessary to enhance current numerical model predictions of the fate of discharged dredged material was completed. D. Field and laboratory work to evaluate bioaccumulation potential in Central Bay from Alcatraz disposal was completed. (2) Nonaquatic/reuse Studies Work Group - A. A comprehensive list of nonaquatic sites was, developed for the region identifying approximately ninety options - the list was narrowed to 3 to 5 sites. B. Land Use and Engineering Elements were completed. C. Two contracts are underway for mapping and analyzing restoration potential of north bay diked lands. Seasonal versus tidal wetland values are being assessed. D. Final site design and documentation is underway for upland/nontidal sites. The contract report scheduled for completion in FY 1994 will lay out future disposal options and beneficial reuse opportunities in nonaquatic environments. (3) Ocean Studies Work Group - A. The final EIS was issued in August 1993. B. Final designation of ocean site is scheduled for May 1994. (4) Environmental Impact Report and Management Plan - A. EPS is federal lead on a Policy EIS for the LTMS. B. An Interim Management Plan describing the existing conditions and circumstances was initiated in FY 1993 and will precede release of the EIS. Plan is scheduled to be available at the conclusion of the LTMS technical studies in August 1994. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT C. The LTMS Management Plan will be revised following completion of the EIS. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 1993 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Crescent City Harbor; Fisherman's Wharf; Monterey Harbor; Moss Landing Harbor: Napa River; Noyo Harbor;Petaluma River; Pillar Point Harbor; San Francisco Harbor; San Leandro Marina; San Pablo Bay; San Rafael Creek; Santa Cruz Harbor; and Suisun Bay Channel; all in California. Fiscal year costs were $476,164. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). None. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $10.163 for Moss Landing Harbor, CA. 8. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was S414,609 for Emeryville, Alameda County, CA. 9. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99. 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $193,892. Total cost to September 30, 1993 was $2,970,022. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 10. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthliorization). Fiscal year costs were $78,374 for preauthorization studies of which $55,244 was for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $1,632 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; $239 for Soquel Creek, CA; and $21,259 for White Slough, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood control activities was $328,654 for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year total costs were $145,947, of which $124,380 was for Salinas River, San Ardo, CA; and $21,567 for Shelter Cove, CA. 11. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modification for Improvement Environment (Section 1135, PL 99-662). of Fiscal year total costs were $33,635, of which $4,310 was for Redwood Creek, CA and $29,325 for Sonoma Bay Wetlands, CA. General Investigations 12. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,677,126, of which $435,518 was for navigation studies; $893,395 for flood damage prevention; $88,924 for miscellaneous activities; $113,445 for special studies; S134,809 for shoreline protection studies; and S 11,035 for coordination studies with other agencies. 13. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $25,652 were incurred, of which S18,391 was for flood plain management service program and $7,261 for hydrologic studies. 14. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a northsouth direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is S3.830.000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $518,826 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 59 percent complete. A Project Management Plan has been prepared to outline the work remaining on this project. The breakwater has an estimated cost of $18,870,000. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep. for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. SAN RAFAEL CANAL, CA San Rafael Canal is located on the northwestern shoreline of San Francisco Bay in the city of San Rafael, about 17 miles north of the city of San Francisco. The Canal is surrounded by San Rafael's central business district and dense residential areas. The Study was authorized by a resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the United States House of Representatives on August 8, 1984, Section 142 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587), as subsequently amended in Section 705 of WRDA of 1986 (Public Lay 99-662). The Feasibility Study recommended the South Floodwall Plan. This plan consists of 750 linear feet of new levees and 11,600 feet of steel sheet-pile floodwall along the south bank of the canal and along the crest of the Bayfront levee. The South Floodwall Plan has a benefit-to-cost ratio of 1.9 to 1, and a first project cost estimated at $26,313,000 (S17,103,000 Federal and $9,210,000 non-Federal). Total costs during the fiscal year were S363,087 with General Investigation funds. 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SSeeection Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 inIlIlITl ex Project......... l I I FY 90iFY i Fiii 2IIYII3ISII.I3II1 9I Bodega Bay, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Crescent City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Fisherman's Wharf New Work Areas, San Francisco Approp. Harbor, CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Humboldt Harbor New Work and Bay, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Moss Landing New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Napa River. CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Noyo River and New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Oakland Harbor, New Work CA Approp. Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost - - - - $1,226,765 1 240 - - - - 1,226,765 1340 158,835 839,307 155,052 112,607 2,456,315 4 40 158,835 664,823 253,491 146,333 2,413,996 4 40 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 9,454,972 6 40 - - - - 9,454,972 6 40 201,711 725,489 971,927 578,247 24,562,601 7 40 207,212 719,206 984,935 452,869 24,421,850 7 40 - - - - 525,000 8 - - - - 525,000 8 - - - - 9,199,000 414850 - - - 9,199,000 414950 17,610 17,610 29,376 382,007 -49,569 387,318 51 29,376 269,691 62,747 387,318 51 - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 3,358,159 3,701,945 2,076,040 2,853,922 71,774,707 10 40 3,287.440 2,973,797 2,917,775 2,745,180 71,655,513 10 40 - - - - 338,215 11 40 - - - - 338,215 11 40 534,403 526,338 83,897 41,472 692,918 5,858,492 12 40 91.838 41,596 634,892 5,800,466 12 40 - - - 1,021,274 13 40 - - - 1,021,274 13 40 2.948 253,046 227,360 34,770 253,046 227,360 109,000 - 354,000 114,670 8,068 238,490 498,562 219,600 33,000 496,742 228,602 24,862 3,364,000 5,24 3,066,269 5,49 2,355.098 1,59 2,369,732 1.52 5,000 1.930,000 )2,399 1,946,689 )2,900 1.380,011 Z9,707 1,451,690 - 1,010,000 - 400,000 2,737 2,737 761,000 518,826 498,438 488,365 2,828,000 2,395,507 1.929,660 1,652,430 4,378,025 13 1440 4,378,025 13 1440 3.466,482 11840 3,108,798 151740 8,342,129 18 1940 8,320,781 18 1940 222.810 20 40 222,810 20 40 30,145,684 21 29,550,248 21 42.522,015 22 42,242,676 22 - 1,010,000 450.790 850.790 34-7 1. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 Petaluma River, C Pillar Point Harbor, CA Redwood City Harbor, CA Removal of Sunken Vessels 2. Richmond Harbor, CA 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton. CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San and CA Francisco Bay Delta Model, 5. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), San Francisco Harbor, CA San Francisco Harbor and Bay, ( (Removal of Drift) A New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work 'A Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 297,146 23 40 - - - - 297,146 23 40 4,604 - 1.046,000 32,000 11,516,711 24 40 6,159 -947 651,685 410,047 11,498,914 24 40 - - - - 6,697,396 43 44 - - - - 6,697,396 43 44 61,554 8,731 367 17,918 2,185,764 44 45 61,554 8,731 367 17,918 2,185,764 44 45 - - - - 1,672,722 25 40 - - - - 1,672,722 25 40 2,704,180 144.629 790,142 1,937,677 13.503,196 26 40 2,684.564 116,657 842,097 1,918,065 13,483,583 26 40 - - - 283,068 283,068 - - - 283,068 283,068 778,000 878,000 831,000 801,000 8,915,527 27 28 635,180 924,710 855,848 704,345 8,738,604 27 28 1,195,171 2,187,020 2,392,165 2,133,977 29,491,715 29 40 1,167,042 2,193,492 2,441,777 2,123,511 29,480,500 29 40 - - - - 164,689 - - - - 164,689 2,500,000 835,000 1,142,000 835,000 34,323,200 42 1,262,488 1,983,042 1,277,722 745,449 34,197,168 42 1,668,234 1,750,100 1,590,145 1,555,679 - 5,134,000 - 4,161,254 3,577,625 2,113,134 2,622,883 2,623,639 2,623,000 2,408,495 1.580,000 1,795,590 1,719,000 1,724,960 24,413,917 24,208,825 9,476,000 8,294,709 - - - 2.689,356 283040 - - - 2,689.356 283040 -737,420 1,184,069 1,125,694 33,127,483 31 40 765,563 1,191,122 1,107.238 33,107,831 31 40 1,740,098 1,66,300 1,948,000 1,576,000 32.098,580 40 1,671,508 1.792,754 1,902,153 1,484.351 31,920,537 40 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project . Funding FY 90) FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 San Leandro Marina, CA San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA San Rafael Canal, CA San Rafael Creek. CA Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demo Project Suisun Bay Channel. CA Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 303,167 303,683 29,349 66,617 1,009,500 3,542,641 32 29,369 66,617 706,935 3,240,076 32 - 1,369,372 28 33 40 - 1,369,372 283340 851,430 1,129,300 1,031,000 2,114,700 857,128 1,110,685 1,046,892 1,659,292 - - - 585,000 - - - 363,087 41,222,643 34 40 40,759,637 34 40 585,000 363,087 - - - - 32,359 40 47 - - - - 32,359 40 47 - 691.825 104,684 823,000 5,436,471 40 46 1,047 376,634 420,311 476,550 5,090,021 40 46 - - - - 4,126,808 62 - - - - 4,126,808 62 - - - - 160,000 36 - - - - 160,000 35 22,821 22,821 5,527 17.918 5,527 17,918 - 375,000 - 191,117 9,646,926 40 53 9,646,926 40 53 375,000 191,117 - - - - 200,928 36 - - - - 200,928 36 875,268 402.700 662,917 488,000 5,912,162 37 40 864,137 407,427 623,374 508,037 5,886,051 37 40 - - - - 217,677 38 - - 217,677 38 491.711 470,441 466.600 78,810 481.652 85,028 - 2,717,028 39 - 2,717,028 39 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943., 2. Includes S585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction. General funds and S129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning costs (S456,000 Construction General costs and S 129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $566,765 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. FY 1956-1993. Excludes contribution funds of S385,134. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and S2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of S44,340. Includes $105,301 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 8. Excludes 52,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes S95.000 contributed funds for existing project. 34-9 _ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and S26,457 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 11., Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12.- Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $229,098 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $760,599 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes 5S7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes S3.168,000 for Preconstruction Planning (S2.588,000 for Breakwater of which S500,000 allocated under Construction. General and $2,088,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which S165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes S2.8 10,316 Preconstruction cost ($2,230,316 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction. General and $1,730,316 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $S165,000 was under Construction. General and S415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $37,229 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes S684.028 for previous projects and 541,223 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of 515,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and 5156,190 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. Excludes contributed funds of 5192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes 5119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes S393,682 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes 5105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27. 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $36,875 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes 5193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $548,844 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $245,885 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1993. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of 5879,454. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,832 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1993. 35. Excludes $810.046 contributed funds on previous project. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes S48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1993. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $451,208 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1993. Includes 5727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 contributed funds. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of 5709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes 5100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $118,964 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1993. 46. Includes $186,699 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1993. Excludes S93,500 contributed funds. 47. Excludes S41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes S9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700.000 under General Investigations. 49. Includes 59,199.000 costs of which S8,499,000 was under Construction, General and S700,000 under General Investigations. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $64,288 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-1993. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $46,266 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1993. 34-10 TABLE 34-B SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21. 1927 2 Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23. 1962 3 Nov. 17, 1986 2. Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 4 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Jetties. North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidcal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong.. 1st sess. 1 Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Habors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73d Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning 3d sess. basin at Terminal No. 1. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo H. Doc. 715, 76th Bay north of Point San Pablo. Cong., 3d sess. Sep. 3. 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent H. Doc. 395, 83rd to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 Cong., 2d sess. 1 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. Oct. 27, 1965 West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet H. Doc. 208, 89th wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering Cong., 1st sess. area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)"). Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond 1986 WRDA, Public Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct Law 99-662 1,200 feet turning basin. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA 1 Completed 1966 $155,550,2 $20,309 9 Berkeley Marina, CA 1 Completed 1979 505,201 3_ Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 974,204 5 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek). CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 34,889 11 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 14,852 10 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA 1 Completed 1976 210,390 8 Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 70,165 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and Public Law 86-645). excludes contributed funds $153,618. 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 3. Excludes S378.989 contributed funds. 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administra- excludes contributed funds S138,189. tion funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) 9. Includes $20,309 for jetty condition surveys placed inactive 1974. The barrier groin and sandtrap for FY 1987-1993. feature of the project was deauthorized November 17, 10. Includes $14,852 for reconnaissance and 1986, by WRDA of 1986. condition survey for FY 1990-1993. 5. Includes $58,235 for reconnaissance and 11. Includes $34,889 for reconnaissance and condition survey for FY 1956-1993. condition survey for FY 1993. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA 1958 Jan. 1, 1990 S 2,000 - Lower San Francisco Bay. CA 1935 Jan. 1, 1990 - - Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Oakland Harbor. CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - - Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Lorenzo Creek. CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - - Santa Cruz County. CA 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 245,639 - 34-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 9 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Corte Madera Creek May 1993 Coyote Creek May 1993 East Weaver Creek May 1993 Eel River at Sandy Prairie May 1993 Klamath River May 1993 Mad River at Blue Lake May 1993 Pajaro River Apr 1993 Pinole Creek May 1993 Redwood Creek May 1993 Rheem Creek May 1993 Rodeo Creek May 1993 Russian River May 1993 San Lorenzo River Apr 1993 San Pablo Creek May 1993 Wildcat Creek May 1993 34-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah. northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ... ........... 35-2 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ................. . 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ............. . ...... 35-3 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................ 35-5 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ................ 35-5 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ........ 35-6 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ................ 35-6 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............. 35-7 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams. CA .......... 35-8 10. Guadalupe River, CA ................ 35-9 11. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA.............,..........35-10 12. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ........ 35-10 13. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA. .. 35-11 14. Little Dell Lake, UT................. 35-13 15. Lower San Joaquin River, CA ........ . 35-13 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek. NV and CA ...................... 35-14 17. Merced County Streams............. 35-14 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA .. 35-15 19. Pajaro River, CA ................ . 35-15 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River. CA ..... 35-16 21. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ..... 35-17 22. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA.. 35-18 23. Sacramento River and tributaries. CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ........ 35-19 24. Walnut Creek, CA ... ............. 35-21 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks. CA ..... 35-22 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. 35-23 Flood Control (Cont'd) 27. Flood Control Work under Special Page Authorization ..................... 35-23 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............... 35-23 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. New Melones Lake, CA.............. 35-23 General Investigations 30. Surveys........................ 35-25 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 35-25 32. Research and Development .......... 35-25 33. Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 35-25 34. Other Work under Special Authority... 35-26 Tables Table 35-A Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-28 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-36 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 35-38 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 35-39 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ..... 35-41 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing...............35-41 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work for Project.............. 35-42 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost ............ 35-42 Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow. Storage. and Outflow for Projects. . . 35-43 Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ........ 35-43 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Tables Table 35-M Table 35-N Table 35-0 Page Tables Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs.......... 35-44 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded from Cost Estimate . . . . . 35-44 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA. from Collinsville Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay. at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing. 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Table 35-P Page to Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs.................. 35-45 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ........ 35-45 Table 35-Q Surveys ............... .35-46 Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and dclocks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton. Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Stone protection on levees was continued at contract cost of $97,067. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing. 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961. barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa. Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento. and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1993) is $50,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $25,200,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids S300.000; and non-Federal cost of $25,200,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($8,400,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong.. 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $8,400,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering was continued. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and completed in July 1990; second contract was awarded September 12, 1990 and completed in August 1991. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA, (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Project estimate (October 1993) is $202,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $172,250,000. including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $780,000; and non-Federal cost of $29,270,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($20,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers: provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads. and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting there from; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances. before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered. set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $20,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. On May 3. 1988, Board passed a resolution of continued support for construction in West Richmond, Pinole Shoal, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay Channels. A Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army, San Francisco District and Contra Costa County to sample berthing areas of project was executed September 12, 1989. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City. and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986,"The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton. Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are consideredc adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. A dissolved oxygen mitigation contract (under new contractor) was continued at fiscal year cost of $91,328. San Francisco District: planning activities continued including continuation of hydrologic studies at the San Francisco Bay Hydrologic model in Sausalito; continuation of a vessel simulation navigation study; and continuation of sediment quality testing for ocean, upland and wetland disposal. Suisun Bay Channel (Martinez to Point Edith) portion of project deferred in November 1989 was reclassified as "active" in August 1993. Only Bulls Head Channel portion will be included as part of Phase III project. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 37 percent complete. Suisun Bay Channel (Martinez to Point Edith) portion of project which had been placed in "deferred" status on November 16. 1989, was 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT reclassified as "active" on August 24, 1993. Only Bulls Head Channel portion will be included as part of John F. Baldwin Ship Channel project. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouthl in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel. an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209. 89th Cong.. 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph. Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA. see Port Series 32. "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is S28,919,597, of which S27,369,597 is Federal cost, including S4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and S1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about 5500.000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98. 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of S141,585. Hydrilla activities were continued at fiscal year cost of S31,902. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 111,622 acre-feet occurred June 15, 1993. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 18,736 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1993. Maximum release of 448 cubic feet per second on September 29, 1993, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 21,075 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $1,675,000 in damages from the January- February rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 was combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETI'LING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet. extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $20.130,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which S11,710,000 is Federal and $8,420,000 is non-Federal (which includes S1.010,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988, Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings. utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,010,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) contract was completed at a contract cost of $2,065,611. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction contract was awarded August 5, 1991 and completed in September 1993. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITI'LEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are. from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897.742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738. 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid $3.862.998 through December 31, 1992. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake. regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek Diversion was 1.090 cubic feet per second on February 9, 1993. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 1.464 cubic feet per second on January 13. 1993. Maximumn storage in reservoir was 23.002 acre-feet on January 22, 1993, and maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 23,741 cubic feet per second on January 7, 1993. Maximum release of 1,835 cubic feet per second on January 25, 1993. was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 68,296 acre-feet was released for flood control. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Damn safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $324,981. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 212,612 acre-feet occurred April 28, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 11,572 cubic feet per second on January 18, 1993. Maximum release of 369 cubic feet per second on June 16, 1993, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 89,392 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no, recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 8. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provided for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Approved estimated cost for new work in Unit 4 and previously constructed features (October 1992) is $31,800,000, of which S18,000,000 is Federal cost and $13,800,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $760,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $760,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet relquirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Macdera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13. 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Minor engineering only. All other work was suspended pending coordination with local communities on selection of a plan to complete the project. New flood plains were furnished to the sponsor. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Maclera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Maclera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District monitors maintenance and operation of the project. 9. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $39,420,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $14,770,000 is Federal and $24,650,000 is non-Federal (includes $595,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985, and Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1987. (HD 91-159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project, pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $595,000 (cash contribution): and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities and flood control facilities. Ultimate non-Federal cost for flood control will be reduced by a Federal reimbursement of one-half of the non-Federal costs in excess of the Federal construction costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15. 1977, clue to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of S6,600,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non-Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was completed at a fiscal year cost of $705,435. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3. 1986. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II. was transferred to local interests in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990: and Laurel Creek Diversion , Phase IIA. was transferred to local interests in December 1990 for maintenance. Channel improvement contract for Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was completed and transferred to local interests on July 8, 1993. 10. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Location. Oa Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 percent of incremental construction cost of locally preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1993) is $134,000,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $61,200,000 is Federal and $72,800,000 is non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit ($5,701,000) allowed for prior work (sec. 104, Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Revision of GDM to address comments was completed in July 1993. Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was continued at fiscal year cost of $3,110,000, including sponsor betterment costs of $235,000. Historical summary. Final General Design Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was completed in July 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded August 10, 1992. 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 11. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera. CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control. irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dclam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is S31,785,426, of which $30.555,426 is Federal cost, including S3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated S 1,230.000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement. see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also. over a period of years, expended about S300.000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess.. contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of S81,415. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 67,486 acre-feet occurred May 2, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 19,372 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1993. Maximum release of 1,971 cubic feet per second on January 15, 1993, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 46,372 acre-feet of water was released for flood control and 58,577 was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $1,552,000 in flood damages from the January-February rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; clam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement. Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 12. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA. near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act. see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is S22.027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is S2.199,085. Operation and maintenance of dclam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945. State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are S4,573.000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid S1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance clue on allocated first cost of 54,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15. 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30. 1971. Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11,. 1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreation purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This was accomplished by using a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. Authority for new concessionaire operating permits to be issued, as well as those previously granted by the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about S965.000; S235.000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about S534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578. issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108.352) and Southern California Edison Co. (S269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954. to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development. or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HBO7-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244.790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990: $60,983 was received in 1991: $65.975 was received in October 1991 (FY 1992) and $77,577 was received in October 1992 (FY 1993). Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1993, amounted to $2,088,227. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $11,025. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 417,080 acre-feet occurred June 29, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 5,713 cubic feet per second on May 26, 1993, and maximum outflow of 2,211 cubic feet per second occurred June 18. 1993. During the year, 601.526 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16.000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the clam for flood control and water conservation purposes. 13. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302.957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period. required by sec. 12. Public Law 93-251. as amended, ended August 5, 1977. and resulted in deauthoriza- 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 tion of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $S14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville. and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co.. which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965. and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1992: Terminus, S2,054,208 and Success. $979,237. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 143,154 acre-feet occurred on June 15, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on October 30, 1992, was about 6,121 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 2,654 cubic feet per second occurred July 8, 1993. Water released for flood control totaled 21,919 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases totaled 524,088 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $110,546. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was above normal during the year. Maximum storage of 58,449 acre-feet occurred on June 21, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 3,402 cubic feet per second on January 8, 1993, and maximum outflow of 573 feet per second occurred on January 19, 1993. Water released for flood control amounted to 6,455 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 109,189 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958. was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 14. LITLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control. municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3.200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet high. a 20.500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek., Estimated project cost (October 1993) is $60,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $34,900,000 is Federal and $25,600,000 is non- Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $20,050,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings. utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $19,200,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10. 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Main dam and appurtenances construction contract was completed at contract fiscal year cost of $1,127,908. Project was transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance in March 1993. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989 and completed in September 1993. Project was transferred to the local sponsor for maintenance and operation on March 26, 1993. 15. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from city of Stockton, CA, extending about 225 miles upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of Fresno) and along Kings River North for approximately 25 miles upstream from Mendota Dam. Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to provide clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Danm. Estimated first cost (October 1992) is S29,776,000, of which $22,876,000 is Federal and S6,900,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period as well as S12,976,000, Federal, and $5,000,000, non-Federal, for work completed by 1974). Existing project was included in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that project for flood protection on Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944, as amended, is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton. CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-202, December 22, 1987 (H.J. Res. 395) modifies 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1983 to include: clearing and snagging in area of North Fork of Kings River in Mendota Pool from southerly boundary of James Reclamation District Number 1606 to Mendota Dam; fish and wildlife mitigation; and such riprapping in area of clearing and snagging on such rivers as may be necessary to prevent erosion from such clearing snagging; and increase estimated cost of clearing and snagging on Lower San Joaquin River, including activities above, from $5,000,000 to $8,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in construction of project at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a local cooperation agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Non-Federal sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, has agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor coordination with local interests and pertinent agencies was continued. Lack of consensus of support by Federal, State and local entities led to request for reclassification of the project to "deferred" status in April 1993. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984. has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract. dredging Eastside Bypass, was awarded October 12, 1984 and completed in May 1985. Unconstructed portion of project was classified as "deferred" on April 9, 1993. 16. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 943 acre-feet occurred on March 17, 1993. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 281 cubic feet per second on March 17, 1993, and maximum outflow of 212 cubic feet per second occurred March 17, 1993. During the year, 15,126 acre-feet was released for flood control and 9,412 acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; clam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks. thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman- Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost (October 1993) is $121,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $83,400,000 is Federal and S36,200,000 is non-Federal (which includes a $6.230,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $270,000, of which $230,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $4,780.000 and includes cash contribution of $510,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986. reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The California Reclamation Board and the Merced County Board of Supervisors have indicated support for balance of the project by letters of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 1991, respectively. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was coipleted in March 1993. Castle Dam check structure contract was initiated at a fiscal year cost of S114,514. Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was awarded February 26, 1991. and construction was completed in March 1993. Castle Dam check structure contract was initiated in April 1993. 18. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Project prevented an estimated S5.980,000 in damages from the January-February 1993 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream. outside limits of project. 19. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Existing project. Provides for construction of a 2-mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from a point about 2.000 feet downstream of Thomas Road to about 3,500 feet upstream of Miller Avenue. Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. Estimated cost (October 1992) for existing project is S13,814.000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which S6.907.000 is Federal and $6.907.000 is non-Federal (which includes $565,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 (HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings. utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $5,649,000 for one half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Final accounting is underway. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract (levee work and hiking trails), and third and final contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Total reimbursement of S5,068,994 has been made to the local sponsor as of September 30, 1993. 20. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River. about 25 miles east of Fresno. CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 2.500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Fedceral cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239.235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of clam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong.. 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14.250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of clam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructecl by the Corps with two 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $ 13,605.002 for irrigation services through December 31, 1992. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22. 1936. applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727.000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking. camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to date of $476.000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988. effective April 1. 1955. was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-13 2 8 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot: the contract covrs April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30. 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2.478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings River Conservation District for hydropower development at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for construction and installation of the penstocks in the amount of $1,044,685 was made to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury in November 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Contract for water stop repair at Pine Flat Dam was initiated. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 926,608 acre-feet occurred on July 3, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 27,623 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1993, and maximum outflow of 8,233 cubic feet per second occurred on July 9, 1993. During the year, 7,944 acre-feet was released for flood control and 1,965,956 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Project prevented an estimated $5,156,000 in damages from the January-February 1993 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired additional acreage as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 acres around that lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. 21. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento. CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $64,600,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $47,400,000 is Federal and $17.200,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3.220,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands. easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities. roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $3.220,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was continued at contract cost of $7,831.203. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. 22. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dclam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from clam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs. to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. reqcluirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost. (30.2 percent currently estimated at S102,700,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is S80.000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759. August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately S1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. Major items of contract work included: Initiation and completion of final control tower grouting at fiscal year cost of $789,365; completion of left bank spillway repair, $113,109, dam access road repair. $124,187, and fish hatchery emergency water supply. $362,559; and initiation of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost of $112.460. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $82,400. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 94.003 acre-feet occurred on January 23, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 11,439 cubic feet per second on January 20, 1993. Maximum release of 4,032 cubic feet per second occurred on January 2, 1993. During the year, 87,482 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 187,119 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $127.000 in damages from the January- February 1993 rainfloods. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 285,183 acre-feet occurred January 23, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 17,106 cubic feet per second on January 20. 1993. Maximum release of 3,848 cubic feet per second occurred February 24, 1993. During the year, 105,433 acre-feet was released for flood control and 115.305 'acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $158,000 in damages from the January- February 1993 rainfloods. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions 'include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981. dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985. boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, and fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Major item of work remaining is completion of Liberty Glen sewer treatment repair. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 23. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding. and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing: construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and, construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is S18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and 56,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31.000,000. of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5.300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River. CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405.000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1993) first cost for project is $S156.500,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $110,200,000 is Federal and S46,300.000 non-Federal comprised of lands and damages including relocations and 523,920.000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Total estimated cost for recreation facilities, S2.710.000 (includes both Federal and non-Federal). Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 194.1 Flood Control Act. and which are reported on page 35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14.508.820. including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that. when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1993) at $23,920,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of S77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results d(luring fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-None. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 140,930 acre-feet occurred April 19, 1993. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 31,897 cubic feet per second on January 20. 1993. and maximum outflow of 15,401 cubic feet per second occurred on January 21, 1993. During the year, 392.602 acre-feet was released for flood control and 269,774 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT $335,000 in damages from the January-February rainfloods. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek. Chico and Mud Creeks. and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. which will accomplished under Sacramento River Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway. and overall project is about 90 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project. bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River. Tehama County-one site. mile 215., (Unit 5). was completed November 1982, two sites. mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6). were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0. 237.9. 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (cd) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acqluisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dclam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 24. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson. San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo. and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels. channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1992) is $98,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $71,630.000 is Federal cost and S26,470,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,945,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22. 1936. applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1992) at S5,840,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek have requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change was approved July 27, 1987. To date, $5,612,681 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering was continued. Contract No. 2 was constructed with a channel cover at 100 percent local cost, however, excessive deflection and roadway noise ensued after the cover was constructed. A contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass Contract 2 channel cover was initiated in April 1993 and completed in August 1993 at fiscal year cost of $630,241. The 9-acre mitigation contract was awarded in December 1992 and 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 construction was initiated at fiscal year cost of S318,952. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 1, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to contractor difficulties with Contract No. 1 (Lionsgate claims and court action) part of the contract work was completed under Contract No. 1A with a different contractor. A contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 2 channel cover was completed in August 1993. The 9-acre mitigation contract was initiated. Work remaining consists of recreation and completion of erosion control mitigation. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 25. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond. Contra Costa County, CA. about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco. CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks: Reach 1 consists of 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be economically infeasible, excluded from total project cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. Approved estimated cost of new work (1993) is $31,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $16,100,000 is Federal cost, and $14,900,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,400,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976. respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511. 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of flood control project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering continued. Phase I recreation was initiatecd. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 1992. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. In March 1990. 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Reach 2 was declared infeasible and is now inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Overall project is about 80 percent complete. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208. title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek. Mormon Slough, Bear Creek. Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River. CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and Redbank, Alluvial Drain and Pup Creek detention basins, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek. all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208. Flood Control Act of June 30. 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24. 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of S1.216,873 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA $324,290 and $30,943 for Big Dry Creek, CA. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $575,084. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was S496,184, of which $421,674 was for disaster preparedness and $74,510 was for emergency operations. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). No emergency bank protection activities this fiscal year. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, two flood insurance studies were continued. Inter- Agency Agreements EMW-E-2226 and 2994, respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $2,107 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca. Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake). Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, and Vallecito. CO, were prepared. Water control manual revisions were essentially completed for Big Dry Creek, CA, but discontinued for McPhee, CO, reservoirs. Little Dell, UT, water control manual was completed. Water control manual was initiated for Jordanelle, UT. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $491,796. Total cost to September 30, 1993, was $7.184,625. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 29. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation. power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility., Approved estimated (October 1993) Federal cost is S400.500.000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended S300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong.. 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established S8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of S2.5 million, S5 million, $13 million, $2 million, 517 million. S18 million, S44 million. S83 million, S46 million. S6 million, and 561 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222. 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of S305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board. by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification contract, $1,049,931 and initiation of powerhouse repair contract, $83,668. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification. reservoir area clearing. Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation area,Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system. Two-Mile Bar recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole recreation area force main contracts have been completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design. and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno. CA. and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. CA. On December 20, 1982. the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99 percent complete. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS See Table 35-Q. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of 5263,000. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $6,000. 32. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1. January 10, 1979. but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-00 38 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were S1,650,383, of which S79,793 was for collection and study of basic data (including flood plain management service), Sl.569,405 was for research and development, and S1,185 was for automatic data processing. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake(selected plan)--widening and/or deepening 4.5 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek--enlarging existing perimeter levees of Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, acquiring easements for 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishing a wildlife refuge; however, the refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. The second project unit-Cache Creek Settling Basin-is reported under Improvement No. 6. General Design Memorandum for the Clear Lake Outlet Channel (Upper Basin) indicated that project was not economically feasible and preconstruction planning was terminated. Studies for possible solutions to Clear Lake flooding are being pursued in the Cache Creek Basin reconnaissance study. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Separate General Design Memorandums were continued on Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. General Design Memorandum for Coyote was submitted in May 1993. Local interests have completed 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 construction, which is integral project work. under sec. 26 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is S4.410.000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County. NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention clam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough. and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths. river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Project has been deferred and preconstruction planning has been terminated as project is economically infeasible. Coordination with local agencies and sponsors was continued and curation of cultural resource materials at the Nevada State Museum was continued. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is S4.300.000. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of channel excavation, floodwalls, set-back levees, bypass channels, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would extend about 5.7 miles, from Trancas Street to Kennedy Park, Approximately 4,200 feet of Napa Creek. from its mouth to Jefferson Street, would also be improved. Project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste preliminary evaluation was continued. The National Economic Development Plan (NED) was identified and a General Design Memorandum supplement and an Environmental Impact Statement supplement were initiated. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is S10,500,000. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UT Project is located in Salt Lake County, UT, just south of Salt Lake City corporate limit. Project consists of a flood control diversion and sediment control structure on Mill Creek above Highland Drive and a 7,440 foot long. 96-inch diameter conduit from the diversion structure into a proposed Hillview Detention Basin south of Mill Creek. Project is designed to operate as a system that will be integrated into existing flood control system of Salt Lake County. Once in place, project will provide nearly 100-year level of flood protection on Mill Creek above State Street. A General Design Memorandum (GDM) was continued. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,100,000. 34. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY YOLO BASIN WETLANDS, SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The Yolo Basin Wetlands area is primarily located within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. Project will include restoration of wetlands, and contribute to a larger program now in the planning stage, proposed by an interagency group of state and local governments and organizations. Proposed work will include physical improvements to help create a mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal wetlands, and riparian forest through modification of existing drainage canals or construction of small dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to proposed wetland areas. Also to be included is preparation of a flood plain hydraulic management model to assess hydraulic impacts of future wetland projects proposed in the Yolo Bypass and construction of an administrative and maintenance facility. Estimated project cost is $11,800,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, sec. 1135(b), as amended by sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. The California State Department of Fish and Game is the project sponsor for 3,480 acres located within the Yolo Bypass. A Project Modification Report and an Environmental Assessment/Initial Study was completed in April 1992. Three existing sites have been identified for possible wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink (3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (480 acres) and Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough Bypass site was later withdrawn due to difficulty in acquiring lands. A flood plain hydraulic management model was initiated in September 1993. Fiscal year costs were S744,387. 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT YOLO WETLANDS BASIN, DAVIS SITE, SACRAMENTO, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located contiguous to boundaries of Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass. which is a leveed tributary of Sacramento River on west side of Yolo Bypass. Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass are operative features of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project will include a 396-acre site that consists of 212 acres of permanent wetland. 64 acres of riparian woodland. 64 acres of grassland/upland, and 56 acres of seasonal wetland. dikes, roads, gates. ponds and islands. Water for wetlands site is available from City of Davis waste water treatment plant and from its stormdrain system. Estimated project cost is 55.800,000. A previous Davis site was included under Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River project, but was withdrawn for consideration by local sponsor clue to difficulty in obtaining lands. Current project is proceeding under authority of sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Project Modification Report was initiated in July 1993 at fiscal year cost of 548,288. 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 1. Sacramento River CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel. CA (Required Contrib. Funds) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - - $40,331,1921 - - - - - 40,331,192 1 $851,029 $964,200 526,400 1,122.618 46,760,578 2 435,174 1,353,399 443,966 1,144,951 46.654,974 3 - - - 85,000 4 509,000 -6,476 700,000 631,142 3,269,000 3.799,847 1,500,000 1,266,274 119,443 -15.000 39,815 2,901.000 1,635,000 2,136,000 1,645,007 2,311,808 2,770,443 - 7,631,474 5 74,967 7,599,400 6 - 2,935,000 1,573 2,539,607 835.000 62,323,000 6 882,769 62,155,680 7 4. San Joaquin New Work River. CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam- New Work H.V. Eastman Lake. Approp. Chowchilla River. Cost CA (Federal Maint. Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost - - - - 5.833,117 8 - - - - 5,833,117 8 109.661 450,000 1,096,000 130.000 14,652,137 9 105,669 442,440 1,098,445 142,154 14,644,970 9 - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 1,031,893 938.700 1,196,000 1.377,000 14,951.393 988,885 1,073,433 1,224,513 1,342,424 14,898,812 - - - - 111,187 10 - - - - 111,187 10 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin. CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries including New Hogan Lake & Farmington Dam. CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 438,000 3,900,000 493,798 426,525 - 400,000 - 40,335 - 400,000 -. - 5,379,000 7,320,728 415.000 622.305 353,000 557,361 500,000 10.446,000 2.163,932 10,246,786 164,000 979,000 236,039 898,679 -29,000 724,000 11 102,592 659,952 12 - - - - 23,723,144 13 - - - - 23,723,144 13 1,542,127 1,576,315 1.613,000 1.857,000 24,765.711 14 1,409,970 1,824,621 1,632,124 1,649,971 24,606,352 14 - 1,398,251 15 16 17 - 1,398,251 15 16 17 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 .. FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams. CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 10. Guadalupe River. CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 11. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 13. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 307,000 170,000 230,864 217,142 3,510 2.135,000 2,556,001 22,000 15.211 525,000 1.354,036 1,081,000 877.152 10,814 24,700 - -25,000 12,458,725 18 82,507 24,690 12,458,720 18 - - 186,095 19 - 41 185,872 19 - - 786,921 20 - 786,921 20 2,447,000 771,000 2,001.354 871,404 - 475,370 18,605 99,416 463,000 85,000 576,362 119.004 - 14,833,000 426,018 14,808,960 - 533,370 377,400 533,365 - 3,779,000 21 30,670 3,650,480 22 1,200,000 1.798,000 6,026,000 1.138,152 1,933.535 6,206,897 - 430,000 -343,000 - - 86,556 - - 441,000 - - 344,491 12,155,000 12,146,716 87,000 86,556 441,000 23 344,491 24 - - - - 30.555,426 - - - - 30,555,426 1,130,718 1.035,700 1,306,000 1,388,000 15,865,818 1,085,236 1.124,821 1,318.900 1,356,119 15,807,736 - - - - 165,112 25 - - - - 165,112 26 1.962.566 1,874,165 60,000 74.314 2.216,900 2,548,784 40.000 39,911 673.000 683,359 2,500 2.575 - 24,450,537 26 - 24,450,537 26 931,000 37,061,062 27 28 876.324 36,990,297 27 28 - 745,500 29 - 744,427 o30 - - - - 34.997,230 31 - - - - 34,997,230 31 2.266.701 2,252.500 2.583,853 2,811,795 37,358.674 32 2,113.057 2,452.863 2,629,169 2,758,093 37,236,874 32 64,000 26,000 - 5,000 633,420 33 34 62,501 27.518 3.135 6.683 632,281 33 3 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 14. Little Dell Lake, UT (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 15. Lower San Joaquin River. CA 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 17. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 18. Merced County Stream Group. CA 19. Pajaro River Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 21. Redbank and New Work Fancher Creeks. CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost 9,770.000 8,566,097 6,100,000 4,138,434 24.528 249,048 2,985,000 4,731,928 2,050,000 4,027,430 14,724 5,884,000 8,121,629 4,400,000 5,009,731 1,259 - -13,000 16,417 3,335 1,841,000 35,899,900 729,187 34,219,702 2,400,000 18.450,000 2,497,500 17,932,052 - 4,320,465 36 - 4,300,147 37 - 4,036,000 - 4,036,000 - - - - 8,504.989 38 - - - - 8,504.989 38 306,033 326.400 291,500 359,000 5,802,383 293,537 325,688 313,889 337,282 5,766,063 -469,000 1,612,000 2,100,000 461.860 2,996,121 3,034,139 - - 430,000 - - 291,000 - 270,000 707.125 285,153 582,769 969,395 1,356,000 1,325,185 80,000 139,000 115,496 319,584 15,301,000 15,062,766 510,000 430,000 3,675,121 39 2,772,711 39 - - - - 2,751,259 40 - - - - 2.751,259 40 100,534 134,800 117,000 135,000 2,264,840 98,652 123,702 135,193 118,923 2,238.937 - 1,122,000 3,709,447 1,184,685 325,214 6,007 - - 8,206,968 41 18,798 18,883 8,203,581 41 - - 610,000 989 6,046 568.409 - - 37,250 42 - 2,770 34.323 43 - - - - 43,356,265 44 - - - - 43,356,265 44 1.393,797 2.324,800 1,916.000 1,917,000 30,596,382 4S 1,337,111 2,398,853 1.943.666 1,929,273 30.562.201 45 - - - - 110.000 46 - - - - 110,000 46 10.270,000 11,500,000 10.471,000 12,714,707 10,746.289 9.844,812 6.878,000 45,806.065 47 9,023,270 45,621,845 47 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text . Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 22. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Danm (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Inmprovements. CA (Federal FundCs) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 23. Sacramento River and Tributaries. CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 24. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds., Other) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,340.000 785,000 425,000 247,000 3,259,500 1,121,482 1,060,100 449,417 285,420 3,178,888 620,000 - 135,000 - 755,000 48 95.000 392,298 156,516 38,618 682,432 48 - - - - 14,435,869 49 - - - - 14,435,869 49 1.566,640 1.693,000 2,175,000 2,487,000 37.502,424 50sso5 1 1,540,757 1,879,266 2.158,612 2,438,883 37,408,144 50sso1 1,500 3.720 5.035.000 3,732,002 2,279,643 1,959,296 1,555 3,550.000 2,294,494 1,217,694 1,178,635 277,500 456,274 9,000 7,439 8,324,000 8.456,104 410,000 529.722 2.285,886 2.983.724 865,000 2,072,816 74,000 96,745 516,000 550,355 1,500 12,386 329,114 589,911 62 1,968 12,444 8,721 257,079 3 3.111,000 5,226.418 2.701.800 3,013,313 10,174 20,658 1,101,000 2,677,698 1.217,300 1,331,790 275,800 622,674 31.500 3,049 1.936,000 3,561.848 422,600 379,198 1.477,100 1.703.646 -609.000 1,253,364 235,504 68,112 16,951 5.217,000 3,291,802 2,579,000 2,705,031 12,400 1,234,000 1,750,674 1,402,000 1,452,100 -29,434 156,109 39,434 62,949 300,000 839,262 25,000 52,958 259,457 31.614 900.000 328,882.645 * 3,148,408 328,189.689 54 2,708,000 23,983,143 65 2,636.918 23,858,516 56 - 230,574 57 12,400 228,732 68 2,201.000 2,324.005 1,580,000 1,551,873 63,000 489,903 15,000 12,008 121,970,008 s9 60o 121,646,393 60 22,717,928 61 22,650,280 61 23,228,404 23,009,974 2,901,296 62 63 2,891,769 62 63 64 1,150,000 71,192,430 65 1,192,099 71,191,933 66 - 5,612,681 67 60.300 5,607.127 68 - 14,854,344 69 18.112 14.570.653 69 1,067,000 408.000 13,269,000 893,311 614,839 13,247,815 - - 859,662 43,293 34,627 604,716 - - 1.666,000 70 - - 1,582,383 71 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 28. Lower San New Work Joaquin River Approp. - 5,223,000 3,651,000 904,000 370,928,996 72 73 and-Tributaries. Cost 1,352,753 5,400,459 2,669,051 2,326,274 368,699,300 73 CA including Maint. Tuolumne and Approp. 689,716 692,000 798,000 845,000 7,767,316 Stanislaus Rivers. Cost 579,537 808,000 827,141 776,081 7,678,574 CA. New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - - - 80,000 74 Cost - - 67,415 - 80,000 74 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular Funds: Previous project, $S185,198; existing project. S585.436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project. $S16,264.432 for shallow-draft and $29,872.426 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, S70.000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $552,720; existing project. $S16.250.142 for shallow-draft and $29,781,112 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, S70.000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $27,999,800 funds for Sacramento District and $34,323,200 for San Francisco District. 7. Includes $27,958,513 costs for Sacramento District and 534.197,167 for San Francisco District. 8. Includes S1,158.348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work clone along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342.500 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds for maintenance. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berendcla Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes $724,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocation activities including demolition or salvage of various pipes and facilities, construction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 12. Includes $659.953 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation activities for State of California. 13. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: total to date $897,742. 14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $580,300 maintenance and operation of dclam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 15. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes 510,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and costs from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 18. Includes S6,999.725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District recluired contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536.921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and S250,000 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes S3,643,000 contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocations (automotive type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, $23,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek, and $113,000 from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening of Railroad Avenue. 22. Includes $3.518,004 contributed funds, other, costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, S 19,537 contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, and S112.939 for Phase IIA contract. 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 23. Includes contributed funds, other: $181,000 for recreation betterment. $190,000 for NED relocations and $70,000 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 24. Includes contributed funds, other costs: S 180,989 for recreation betterment, S93,766 for NED relocations and S69,736 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 25. Contributed funds, other from the State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 26. Includes $2,199.085 Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 27. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 28. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 29. Includes $438,000 contributed funds. other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $330,000 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 30. Includes $438,000 contributed funds. other, costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $306,516 costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 31. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date S747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date: 5704,000. 32. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 33. Includes contributed funds, other. from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, S30,000 and at Terminus Dam. S 12,420. 34. Includes contributed funds. other, from Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia. California for Terminus Dam hydropower studies , S423,000; and from DITT, Inc., Paris, France. for Success Lake hydropower studies, $S168,000. 35. Includes contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $422,344, and for Success Lake hydropower studies, $166,334. 36. Includes $4,320,465 contributed funds, other from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $4,300.147 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes S1,200 initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California. 40. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 41. Includes $S1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 42. Includes $S37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 43. Includes $34,323 contributed funds, other, costs for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 44. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 45. Includes $158,300 special recreation fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake and $453,485 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 46. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 47. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30. 1985 (S29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 48. Includes contributed funds, other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation and betterments (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam. 49. Excludes S5,598,000 contributed funds; S400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and S1,628.411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 50. Includes S94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $S1,378,980 maintenance and operation of dclam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1993. 52. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam. Lake Mendocino. hydropower studies: and $338,000 from California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 53. Includes $257,079 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and S7,697 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 54. Includes S253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek. Warm Springs Dam. 55. Includes $964. 114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek. Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes S208,074 contributed funds, other. from Sonoma County for Dry Creek. Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 58. Includes $208.074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 59. Excludes S614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 60. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 61. Includes S104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008. for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 63. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds. other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; $365,500 contributed funds, other, from the City of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of California for relocations. 64. Includes $355,973 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 costs for relocations. 65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other. and contributed funds costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $1,666,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 71. Includes $1,582,383 contributed funds, other, costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E). 73. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 74. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep 30, 1993 1 2 American and New Work Sacramento Rivers. Approp. - - $1,600,000 2,542,000 $4,142,000 CA Cost - - 1,177,627 2,952,122 4.129,749 Cache Creek Basin. New Work CA (Outlet Channel) Approp. 269,000 - -13,000 -3,000 2,246,000 Cost 309,365 11,842 -7.588 3,085 2,246,000 Caliente Creek, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 60,000 Cost 1,688 - 9 - 60,000 Coyote and Berryessa New Work Creeks. CA Approp. 535,000 1,160,000 885,000 1,016,000 4,410,000 Cost 695,054 1,066,409 835,620 1,307,497 4,326,155 Napa River, CA New Work Approp. 1,313,000 560,000 2,000,000 850,000 5,473,000 3 Cost 1,399.940 532.776 1,933.885 1,119,968 5,442,039 3 Truckee Meadows. New Work NV Approp. 1,356.000 786,000 -307,000 -15,570 3,787,430 Cost 1.600.783 818,804 67,736 7,121 3,780,091 Upper Jordan New Work River, CA Approp. 200.000 525,000 375,000 - 1,100,000 Cost 177.236 352,887 346,138 170,182 1,046,444 West Sacramento. New Work CA Approp. - - - 525,000 525,000 4 Cost - - - 496,395 4962395 4 1. Beginning in FY 1982. Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction. Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations., 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 3. Excludes 52,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project on Napa River. (See Table 35-E.) 4. Previously studied under Sacramento Metropolitan Area, Northern California Streams, CA. Funds transferred from American River Watershed. 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3. 1899 July 25. 1912 Jan. 21. 1927 Aug. 30. 1935 Aug. 30. 1935 Aug. 26. 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17. 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 1. 35-36 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., works. 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. 1 The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123. 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa Rivers and Harbors and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing Committee Doc. 35, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers 73d Cong., 2d sess. is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Rivers and Harbors Federal Government of S12 million in cost Committee Doc. 35, Sof Shasta Reservoir. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship 2d sess. channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as 2d sess. modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to Sec. 204, 1966 Flood provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward Control Act. cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823. 1986 WRDA 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel H. Doc. 585. 81st Cong., improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River 2d sess. and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial PL 404, 84th Cong.. stage of project development. 2d sess. 8. 22. TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act " Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hAatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 23. Dec. 22. 1944 May 17. 1950 July 3. 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7. 1974 June 19, 1975 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., to provide for extensions in levees and other 2d sess. 2 structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of S 15 million for initiation of modification. Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., (included full monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning 2d sess. 2 area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of S 14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of S7 million for bank PL 90-17 protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank PL 93-251 erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14. 1960, and additional authorization of S 16 million for such purpose. 3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Reservoir. 4 Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento. see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740.000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-37 __ __ I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report' See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - 5 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels. CA Completed 1974 $ 8,3543 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,1325 6 - Old River. CA Completed 1970 23,1857 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels. CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel. CA Completed 1974 200,928 9 10 11 3,316,6221 2 13 Suisun Channel. CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,489 13 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,7285 15 - 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and S3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project,. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough. Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and 5483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $ 12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Big Wash. Milford, Beaver County, UT Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Cottonwood Creek, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek. San Joaquin County. CA East Weaver Creek, CA Folsom Lake. American River, CA Green Valley Creek. Solano County. CA Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lakeport Lake. CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers. CA Marysville Lake, CA Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas. CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Reese River. Battle Mountain, NV Rheem Creek, CA Rodeo Creek, CA Salinas River. CA Salt Lake City, Jordan River. UT San Leandro Creek, CA San Lorenzo Creek, CA San Lorenzo River, CA Sevier River near Redmond, UT Sonoma Creek, CA Truckee River and tributaries, CA and NV Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 93 expenditure Active/no FY 93 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 93 expenditure Completed Active/no FY 93 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 93 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Active/no FY 93 expenditure 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1981 1991 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 S26,995,350 2,125,8183 1,000 1,369,931 4 217,8795 6 26,049 5 3,570,000 7 15,765,000 705,622 1 5 664,825 8 220,636 1 5 9 63,014,810 10 136,0266 11 407,989 5 12 1,503,073 6 13 4,838,000 1 10,252,950 14 70,425,470 15 2,353,003 16 27,835,263 17 - 18 10,918,796 19 2,643,499 20 2,965,40221 2,639,955 1 22 12,890,62523 904,278 5 24 25 885,750 1 6 4,620,070 1 26 133,339 6 27 400,000 1 5 28 974,100 1 5 94,213 1 29 1,227,57030 1,000,000 1 31 5,130,821 1 32 4,314,406 1 33 919,000 34 781,500 1 35 1,038,960 35-39 S54,778 1 2 __ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs., 3. Excludes $54.919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951.000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes S22.000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Excludes S69.262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification study was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1993 at fiscal year cost of $123,617. 8. Excludes S50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 9. Includes S174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 10. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 11. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 12. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 13. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 14. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 15. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. 16. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized November 17, 1986. and was reauthorized November 17, 1988. 17. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000. respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18. 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries.Project prevented $1,740,000 in damages from January-February 1993 rainfloods. 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. Project prevented $3,110,000 in damages from January-February rainfloods. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of 5599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $S146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 26. Includes S107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $19.000 for preauthorization studies. 28. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30. 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962 - 1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $32,600,000 in damages from the April-May 1993 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were S118.000 (1951). Project prevented 5376,000 in damages from the April-May 1993 snowmelt runoff. 35. Placed inactive 1974. 35-40 TABLE 35-G SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $ 300,000 - Bear River, CA 1980 1986 - - Eel River. CA 1971 1986 1.272,816 - Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 - Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - Spanish Fork River. UT 1955 1977 20,000 - Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - (Morgan County) TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range In Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high w a t e r . . .. .. I- 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Modification Corps of Coast Engineers Guard (Construction) (Construction) Required Cash Contribution Lands and Damages (including Relocations) Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349.500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,170 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 S 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 2 5 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 5 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 35-42 Total Total Project SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 21,718 5,751 1,843 Bear 16,808 5,101 1,778 Owens 5,117 1,779 158 Mariposa 13,608 8,198 971 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,0001 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 257,000,000 102,717,0002 359,717,000 Total $271,436,000 $108,315,000 $379,751,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and damages. 35-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-M, RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 22 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $ 17,550,000 1 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 356,853,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,864,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 23 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal 1 Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-44 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER ANDTRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 42C initiation (Fish Exclusion Barrier) miles 90-4R and 90-9R, Sacramento River. Yolo County $ 115,520 $ 27,097 $ 142,617 Contract 42C initiation and completion emergency bank protection (Sacramento River Bank Protection project) miles 90-4R and 90-9R. Sacramento River 1,089,199 255,336 1,344,535 1. Contract terminated for convenience of the Government, effective December 18, 1992. TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost (Federal) Antelope and Blackburn Creeks. CA 1 Reconnaissance $ 25,163 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning. CA i Reconnaissance 6,238 City of Isleton, CA 1 Reconnaissance 54,043 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO Feasibility 1,542 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO Plans and Specifications 108,734 Cottonwood Creek near Walker Lake Community, NV 1 Reconnaissance 3,885 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA 1 Reconnaissance 3,891 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Feasibility 281,582 Mill Creek, City of Moab, UT 1 Reconnaissance 39,787 Sacramento River, Tehama. CA 1 Reconnaissance 1,073 Smithneck Creek, Loyalton. CA 1 Reconnaissance 28,052 Thomas Creek. Reno, NV 1 Reconnaissance 21.094 $575,084 1. No further studies recommended. 35-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-Q SURVEYS (See Section 30 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies $2,378,500 Required Cost Contributions 566,705 Non-Federal Contributions (not required) 24,762 Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers Special Study 307,023 Special Investigations 91,000 Review of FERC Licenses 30,000 Interagency Water Resources Development 35,000 National Estuary Program 7,000 American Waterfowl Management Plan 7,000 Coordination with Other Water Resource Agencies 15,000 Planning Assistance to States 503 (Colorado - $503) Total $3,462,493 35-46 PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION The California Debris Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ............ .... 35-1A 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) .................. 352A 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 35-2A Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA .............. .35-3A Tables Table 35-AA Table 35-BB Table 35-CC Table 35-DD Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-6A Authorizing Legislation............. 35-8A Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project . . . . 35-9A Sacramento Urban Area Levee Restoration, CA New Work: Major Contracts and Fiscal Year Costs .... 35-10A Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provided for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners were fully investigated by the former California Debris Commission and permits to operate were issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Government-constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the former 35-1A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The former Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6. 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dan were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years, was again renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1989, and will be effective until February 28, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., (PG&E) (a 1941 contract which expired July 31, 1991) payment was made to Federal Government of $18,000 per year for first 30 years and $48,000 per year for the next 20 years in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1993, amounts to $1,518,393; these funds are now paid to the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to the Treasury. PG&E has obtained a new license, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 1403-004, issued February 11, 1993, for continued operation of Narrows No. 1 Hydroelectric Project and will enter into a new storage agreement and an operation agreement with the Federal Government (Corps). The $48,000 received in Fiscal Year 1993 is a partial payment and Fiscal Year 1993 remainder of$18,070 will be paid in Fiscal Year 1994. Payments under new agreement are effective as of Fiscal Year 1993 and will be 8.2 percent of previous fiscal year's total costs for operation and maintenance. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG- 66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1993, amounts to $2,273,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $757,736, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the 35-2A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. ,For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report. p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11.250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor; and bank protection, Yuba River, various locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $1,877. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1993 total project cost is $197,945,000, of which $97,325,000 is Federal and $100,620,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109); Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area (engineering and design only), but excludes Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction and Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Colusa Basin Drain and Knights Landing (West Levee) are not incrementally economically feasible, but these sites have been transferred to Upper Sacramento Area. Knights Landing (East Levee) has been included with Mid-Valley Area. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of 35-3A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000. respectively, a total of $3.080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1993) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $46,800,000 of which $28,800,000 is Federal and $18,000,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $3,530,000). Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part of the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located between River Mile 202 and 206 on Sacramento River near the Glenn-Tehama county line. The Corps riffle restoration project includes multiple weir structures in the river to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river hydraulics. Estimated (October 1993) project cost is $14,200,000, of which $10,650,000 is Federal and $3,550,000 is non-Federal. Project was established under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood Control Project (see Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1990). Phase II - Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Butte, Sutter and Yuba counties in north-central California. Area includes Feather and Yuba Rivers and their tributaries, Sutter Bypass, cities of Marysville and Yuba City and communities of Linda and Olivehurst. An evaluation of about 134 miles of Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in Marysville/Yuba City area identified about 22 miles of levees as being structurally unstable. Project consists of reconstructing those levees by installing about 17 miles of toe drains, installing about 4 miles of slurry cut-off walls and backfilling about 1 mile of a drainage ditch to rectify structural stability; also consists of raising about 10 miles of levees to restore design freeboard and developing about 76 acres for fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1993 project cost is $31,500,000, of which $23,700,000 is Federal and $7,800,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $1,820,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction: For major contracts and fiscal year costs, see Table 35-DD. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.): Engineering was continued on riffle restoration on Sacramento River including building of multiple weir structures to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. (c) Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering initiated. Design Memorandum completed and approved in July 1993. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was 35-4A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction-Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area. (See Table 35-CC for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1993.) 35-5A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-AA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $821,325 821,325 571,490 681,300 700,000 582,877 695,998 725,921 - - 11,010 -16,325, 5,257 5,257 14,700 347 347 2,000 18,634 830,000 805,736 299,990 23,040 5,093,999 1 2 5,093,999 1 2 11,918,9333 11,875,758 4 323,420 5 35,4606 - 361,482 - 361,482 7,000 1,820,031 7 9,407 1,814,4797 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 361,777 - 361,777 12,000 27,500 1,841,338 8,790 11,722 1,795,175 1,053,904 1,053,904 34,0008 34,0008 425,000 950,000 1,221,000 484,000 76,175,835 9 14 1,026,885 1,221,226 1,515,322 398,056 76,082,509 9 14 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 10,724,085 10 - - - - 10,724,085 10 - - - - 9,68611 - - - - 9,686 1 3,600,000 10,663,000 3,371,000 5,406,000 24,240,000 2,478,099 5,005,372 8,823,196 6,203,394 22,510,062 35-6A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SSeeection Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 (Required New Work Contributed Contrib. 390,000 1,000,300 514,900 134,800 2,040,000 Funds) Cost 54,411 395,330 634,064 739,445 1,823,250 (Contributed New Work Funds, Other) Contrib. 510,000 2,615,000 2,196,712 270,928 5,592,640 12 Cost 10,559 929,456 2,227,152 2,309,364 5,476,531 12 Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. 493,000 500,000 300,000 500,000 1,793,000 13 Control Cost 107,838 329,783 662,724 578,432 1,678,787 13 (G.C.I.D.), CA (Federal Funds) Sacramento ScaetNeNWeowk -W- ork - 538,000 538,000 14 River Flood Approp. -538000 538,000 14 Control Cost - - - 535,842 535,842 14 (Marysville/Yuba City Area levees), CA (Federal Funds 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $1,416,082 from regular funds and $9,672,851 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $9,653,940 from regular costs and $1,416,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Includes $12,420 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float; and $311,000 funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes $12,420 costs for acquisition of boarding float and $23,040 costs for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 12. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. (Sacramento Urban Area). 13. G.C.I.D. construction funds received in FY 1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 total funds and costs under General Investigations for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 14. Not reflected in actual annual accounting records for Marysville/Yuba City are $1,710,000 costs for FY 91 and FY 92 incurred under Sacramento River Flood Control Project for design effort. These costs are considered part of Marysville/Yuba City cost-shared project. 35-7A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess. 1 (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)1 June 19, 1934 Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rightsof- way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA 35-8A 1.0 Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-BB (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act , Project and Work Authorized , Documents 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, H. Doc. 649, 78th and May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, Cong., 2d sess., and and multipurpose reservoirs. 2 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improve- H. Doc. 272, 84th ments, Sacramento River from Chico Landing Cong., 2d sess. to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, S. Doc. 103, 86th Sacramento River. 2 Cong., 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 35-CC SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $73,916,040 $1,979,104 $75,895,144 1 Public W' s 1,486,469 -- 1,486,469 Total U.S. 75,402,509 1,979,104 77,381,613 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 -- 5,104,333 Total All Funds 85,446,594 1,988,790 87,435,384 2 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento Urban Area Le,.e Reconstruction, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.) and Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction projects, all authorized under the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. (See Table 35-AA). 35-9A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 35-DD NEW WORK: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA MAJOR CONTRACTS AND FISCAL (See Section 4 of Text) " YEAR COSTS Required Contributed Contributed Funds Item Federal Funds Other Total Greenhaven Pocket Phase II $1,895,844 $215,673 $1,244,058 $3,355,575 Repair Boil - Greenhaven Pocket Phase II 723,813 -71,948 - 795,761 Natomas South 2,413,313 216,705 712,213 3,342,231 Natomas North -12,859 27 130,669 117,837 West Sacramento 108,603 13,613 9,198 131,414 Greenhaven Pocket Phase I 105,657 5,969 78,063 189,689 35-10A PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with both district and division functions. Its civil works responsibilities encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that its area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ....................... 2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii........... 3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Erosion Control 5. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Flood Control 6. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii ... ....... 7. Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii .......... 8. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 9. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia ........... Page General Investigations 10. Surveys .............................. 36-1 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data....... 36-2 12. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 36-2 Tables 36-2 Table 36-A Table 36-B Table 36-C 36-2 Table 36-D Table 36-E 36-2 36-2 Table 36-F Table 36-G 36-3 Table 36-H Page 36-3 36-4 36-4 Cost and Financial Statement .... 36-5 Authorizing Legislation .......... 36-6 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 36-7 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... 36-8 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 36-9 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ........... 36-9 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 .......... 36-11 36-3 Navigation 1. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is being prepared and negotiated with the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $958,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $151,330. Work during the Fiscal Year included preparation and negotiation of a draft Section 106 Memo- 36-1 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 randum of Agreement with the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, State Historic Preservation Office and National Parks Service. A limited reevaluation report was prepared and submitted to HQUSACE for review and comment. Plans and specifications were approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1993. 2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation' Agreement (PCA) is being prepared and negotiated with the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. 'Work during the Fiscal Year included completion and circulation of a draft, Environmental Impact Statement for review and com-. ment by the local sponsor; continued efforts to obtain necessary permits by the local sponsor; and the initiation of computer model studies for alternative designs by the Waterways Experimental Station. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $196,273. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1993. 3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted by the Portland District at Barbers Point Deep Draft Harbor, Oahu; Honolulu Harbor, Oahu; Kahului Deep Draft Harbor, Maui; Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai; and Rota Harbor, CNMI in May and June 1993. Surveys were also conducted in October 1992 at Nawiliwili Deep Draft and Small Boat Harbors, Kauai; and Port Allen Harbor, Kauai. Total costs to conduct the above surveys were $55,553. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $1,002 for Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui; -$8,017 for Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii; and $11,819 for Rota Harbor, CNMI. Beach Erosion Control 5. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-H. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $3,027 for Canneries to Breakers Point, American Samoa; $3,027 for Lauliituai-Aumi, American Samoa; and $3,027 for Nua-Amaluia, American Samoa. Flood Control 6. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed onApril 27, 1992. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY92 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continuing coordination with the local sponsor for land acquisition required for the project. An assessment of Hazardous and Toxic Waste materials at the project site was completed in March 1993. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $194,946. Plans and specifications were approximately 95% complete as of September 30, 1993. 7. KAWAINUI MARSH, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kawainui Marsh is located in Kailua on the windward coast of the island of Oahu, Hawaii. It is bounded by the Mokapu Saddle Road on the north, Kailua Road on the south, and the community of Coconut Grove on the east Existing project. The authorized project provides a combination of concrete floodwalls on a raised levee. The floodwall would vary in height to a maximum of 4 feet along the total levee length of about 6,300 feet. A flood warning system is an integral part of this plan. The existing project is authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The estimated project 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION cost is $10,495,000 of which $5,000,000 is Federal cost and $5,495,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on October 3, 1993 between the Department of the Army and the City and County of Honolulu. The local sponsor must: (a) provide, during the period ofconstruction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs; (b) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, and perform all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the Project; (c) provide during the period of construction, an additional cash contribution in the amount necessary to make its total contribution equal to 25 percent of total project costs if the value of the contributions provided under a and b above represents less than 25 percent of total project costs; (d) be responsible for all costs in excess of $5,000,000; (e) not use Federal funds to meet their share of project costs under the Agreement unless the expenditure of such funds is expressly authorized by statute as verified in writing by the Federal granting agency; (f) agree to participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; (g) comply with all items of local cooperation set out in the Final Detailed Project Report and Environmental Impact Statement for Kawainui Marsh Flood Control Project jointly prepared by U.S. Army Engineer District, Honolulu, and the City and County of Honolulu, dated July 1992, and approved by the Chief, Planning Division, Directorate of Civil Works on October 22, 1992; (g) operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the Project in a manner so that liability will not arise under CERCLA. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications was completed by AE contract during the Fiscal Year at a cost of $70,033. The CDUA, Shoreline Management Act and Stream Channel Alteration permits necessary for the project were obtained, and application for the necessary local permits were submit-, ted. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in October 1993, and the local sponsor has construction funds available. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $187,692. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1993. 8. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $23,799 for Agana Bayfront, Guam; $82,233 for Commercial Port Road, Guam; $34,152 for EastAgana, Guam; and $45,995 for Waihanau Stream, Molokai, Hawaii. Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. Fiscal Year costs were $16,763 for Kanaha Valley, Maui, Hawaii. Project Modifications for Improvements of Environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99- 662, as amended. (Preauthorization) Fiscal Year costs were $2,754 for Hoomaluhia Stream, Oahu, Hawaii; and $1,892 for Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $292,105 ofwhich $211,680 was for disaster preparedness; $15,000 for rehabilitation; $35,608 for emergency operations; $8,241 for field investigations; and $21,577 for hazard mitigation. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 9. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map). Existing project. For a description of the existing project see page 36-4 of the FY85 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-5 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance training was completed and the plant turned over to the Pohnpei Public Utilities Corporation in April 1993. Installation ofan automatic trash rack is scheduled for completion in Fiscal Year 1994. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $127,834. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $381,456 of which $165,049 was for flood damage prevention studies; $106,939 for miscellaneous activities; and $109,468 for coordination 36-3 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 with other agencies. In addition, $3,936 in non-Federal funds for coordination with other agencies. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. The Flood Plain Management Services Program is authorized and implemented under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Non-Federal agencies are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. Beginning November 21, 1991, Federal agencies and private entities were also offered these services on a cost recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 3,289, which included services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Costs for providing these services during the fiscal year were $399,711. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $4,984. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $404,695. 12. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI- As directed by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, preconstruction engineering and design studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1993. A reconnaissance level study was completed in April 1993 using data from previous studies. The report was approved by HQUSACE in August 1993, and is the basis for initiation of the preconstruction engineering and design phase. A Special Report and Technical Appendix is scheduled for initiation in Fiscal Year 1994. Fiscal Year 1993 costs totaled $25,913. 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Sept. 30, 1993 1. Kawaihae Small New Work: Boat Harbor, Approp. 156,000 260,000 130,000 160,000 958,200 Hawaii, HI Cost 175,904 237,196 153,136 151,330 949,525 (Federal Funds) 2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: Maui, HI Approp. 88,000 250,000 119,000 235,000 1,087,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 151,254 126,373 233,505 196,273 1,028,065 6. Alenaio Stream, New Work: Hawaii, HI Approp. 358,000 265,000 256,000 220,000 1,495,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 259,599 276,943 344,714 194,946 1,444,974 7. Kawainui Marsh, New Work: Oahu, HI Approp. 228,000 75,000 0 191,000 516,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 199,405 95,203 393 187,692 512,691 (Contributed Contrib. 220,000 30,000 0 0 250,000 Funds) Cost 188,190 43,850 17,951 9 250,000 9. Nanpil River New Work: NHayndp9i.l Rivopower, Approp. 120,000 412,000 126,000 138,000 8,000,000 Pohnpei, FSM ApprCost 183,039 293,310 205,628 127,834 7,834,735 (Federal Funds) 36-5 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 3, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 20, 1980 Dec. 8, 1983 KAWAIIAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetstructure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, IIAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HIAWAII Project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of concrete-lined channel; floodproofing five individual structures, relocation of one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas. Modified by the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment dated March 1990, at a total cost of $12,060,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $7,730,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $4,330,000. NANPIL RIVER IIYDROPOWER, POHIINPEI, FSM Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction of a hydroelectric project. Sec 301, PL 89-298 Cong., 1st sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 401, PL 99-662 Sec 102, PL 101-640 Sec. 101, PL 96-205 Sec. 2, PL 98-213 36-6 6. 9. TABLE 36-C PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Agat Harbor, Guam Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Rota Harbor, CNMI Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Welles Harbor, Midway Island Status" Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report for: 1978 1989 1982 1982 1990 1978 1991 1971 1985 1976 1984 1968 1990 1981 1956 1981 1990 1986 1987 1976 1976 1979 1984 1985 1982 1985 1979 1950 Cost to September 30, 1993 Construction $ 937,7981 2,000,0002 1,033,015 3 1,783,129 4 53,508,709 5 527,047 5,512,440 781,036 7 16,044,095 751,8679 7,203,221 10 157,9971 171,400 5,983,501 1 3,348,000 12 193,000 3,623,450 13 372,00014 2,127,72415 584,5131 980,01817 432,523 9 752,645 18 2,000,000 19 194,000 1,991,56920 1,940,011 21 2,448,05622 Operations and Maintenance 52,555 55,197 594,970 485,551 208,902 4,091,308 63,693 2,747,543 7,287,654 3,127 61,800 41,857 495,256 10,116,779 30,707 1,474,098 1,779,829 436,200 546,600 92,900 2,111 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Fun2d s of $282,474 for Construction. n addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 51n addition, Contributed Funds of $2,400,003 for Construction. sAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 7In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. "In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 1"In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 1"In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 12Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 2 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $364,757 for Construction. 14In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 15"In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. i 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. "In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. s20Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 2 In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 22Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-7 A I - REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,0151 $ Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,1812 - Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 3 --- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 -- Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 -- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,9966 --- Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313 --- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 -- Lepua Area, American Samoa Completed 1992 1,791,525 --- Masefau Bay, American Samoa Completed 1992 500,0002 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,0002 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 --- Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,9412 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,187 10o ... Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 11 Saipan Beach Road, CNMI Completed 1992 176,000 2 - Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,87912 - Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1992 1,313,400 s ... Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,30914 ... Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,0871s 183,000 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. S Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $399,999 in Constibuted Funds. I"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. 1 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 12Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized for construction by Public Law 100-71. In addition, $1,226,486 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 15 1"Inad dition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contrib. uted Funds. 36-8 TABLE 36-E PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ --- Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867 1' Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 63,458 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,910,000 2.. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1990 10,665,758 . Kaneohe.Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 ... Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 1 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 6 Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 5 Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 . 'In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 4Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation construction 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $459,001 in cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. Contributed Funds 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3In addition, $518,272 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai l-arhor Onhu Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40,117 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 1967 1965 1972 1967 1975 PL 99-662 November 1977 HD #94-413 November 1981 HD #97-59 November 1986 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 January 1990 PL 99-662 July 1981 Director of Civil Works 1,481 86,235 36-9 ' 46A" TV C&A C4L V.P% ,) W LL ) , A JC TV 36-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 36.G (Cont'd). DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, 1979 July 1981 221,500- Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, 1966 January 1990 133,188 292,441 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, --- January 1990 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1977 January 1990 186,937 PL 99-662 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, . 1972 January 1990 30,378 Oahu, Hawaii PL 99-662 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii --- January 1990 PL 99-662 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas --- November 1991-- PL 99-662 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 . PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 . PL 99-662 TABLE 36-H PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Haaula Highway, Oahu, Hawaii $ 8,051 Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 8,864 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa 4,907 Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii 20,838 Ofu Airstrip (West End) American Samoa 20,522 Punaluu Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 11,685 TOTAL $74,867 36-11 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville l)am,, OR and WA .............................. 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ........................... 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ............. 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ............ 37-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ......................... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA .... 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and 'he Dalles, OR ..................... 37-4 8. Columbia River, Seafarcrs Memorial, Hammond, OR ............................. 37-5 9. Coos Bay, OR .............................. 37-5 10. Coquille River, OR ....................... 37-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR ............................. 37-6 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .. 37-6 13. Port Orford, OR ............................ 37-7 14. Project Condition Surveys.................... 37-7 15. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ...... 37-7 16. Siuslaw River, OR ........................ 37-7 17. Skipanon Channel, OR ...................... 37-8 18. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR .................. 37-8 19. Umpqua River, OR ......................... 37-8 20. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ...... 37-9 21. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ................ 37-9 22. 7.5 MCY Standby Time ..................... 37-10 Flood Control 23. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 37-10 24. Blue River Lake, OR ....................... 37-10 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................... 37-11 26. Dorena Lake, OR .......................... 37-11 27. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ...... 37-11 28. Fall Creek Lake, OR ....................... 37-12 29. Fern Ridge Lake, OR.................... 37-12 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 37-13 31. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 37-13 32. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank IProtection, OR and WA ............................. 37-13 33. Mill Creck, Salem, OR ..................... 37-14 34. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ........ 37-14 35. Sandy River, City of 'Troutdale, OR........... 37-14 36. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-14 Page 37. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR .. 37-15 38. Willow Creck Lake, Heppner, OR............ 37-15 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39. Bonneville Lock and Dam -- Lake Bonneville, OR and WA............. 37-15 40. Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and WA ............................... 37-16 41. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles Project), OR and WA.... 37-16 42. Cougar Lake, OR .......................... 37-17 43. Detroit Lake -- Big Cliff, OR ................ 37-17 44. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR .............. 37-18 45. Hills Creek Lake, OR .............. ...... 37-18 46. John Day Lock and Dam -- Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ................. 37-18 47. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR ............ 37-19 48. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 37-20 49. The Dalles Lock and Dam -- Lake Celilo, WA and OR .................... 37-20 General Investigations 50. Surveys................................. 51. Collection and Study of Basic Data........... 52. P1rcconstruction Engineering and Design ...... 37-21 37-21 37-21 Tables "Ihble 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 37-22 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 37-29 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 37-36 Tible 37-D Not Applicable Thble 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 37-37 Tlable 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power .......... 37-39 Table 37-G Deauthorizcd Projects ............. 37-40 "hble 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ............ ....... 37-41 Table 37-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........... ..... 37-41 'Fable 37-J Project Condition Surveys .......... 37-42 37-1 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ................. 37-42 Thble 37-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 37-42 Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations. 37-43 Thble 37-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock Spillway Dam and Powerplant . 37-44 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplcmental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $347,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to shipping on March 26, 1993. Work to restore the grounds and historic buildings will be accomplished in FY1994. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jettiesat the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. '1'here are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 33,884 cubic yards of material was removed by contract hopper dredge. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DcFuca. "lbtal length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Hlarbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide 37-2 PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feect deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 fcct, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-liftoff and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 6,838,583 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 3,445,385 cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 491,348 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 2,238,847 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Padre Island removed 663,003 cubic yards. Maintenance dredging of the Columbia River was significantly altered this year due to concerns for endangered salmon species and their habitat. Pending receipt of formal consultation on the issue by National Marine Fisheries Service, operations will continue to be restricted. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel cast of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished Decemher 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and 37-3 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished Sep-, tember 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was performed. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A' on the north shore and by dredging.The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A' is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A') was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 3,856,726 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 1,568,295 cubic yards of material, and the contract dredge Padre Island removed 2,288,431 cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND TIlE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 4, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existi.ng proj.ect. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hlood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near cast end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the 37-4 P()RTI'ANI), OREGON DISTRICT * channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, Wa, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. Cleanup of potentially hazardous waste in an upland site (utilized to dispose of FY 1992 dredge material from The Dalles small boat basin) was completed to the satisfaction of EPA and Oregon DEQ. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, IIAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, in the City of Warrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrcnton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small 37-5 REPORT OF TIIHE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300,576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products bybarge. Abarge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ncy Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. A feasibility study for deepening the Coos Bay navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 901,729 cubic yards of material was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 67,197 cubic yards, the contract dredge Newport removed 497,660 cubic yards, the contract hopper dredge Westport removed 46,872 cubic yards, and the contract clamshell dredge GL-53 removed 290,000 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas in Charleston entrance channel. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and emptics into Pacific Ocean at Ban. don, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Twvo rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Iort of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. The economics were reevaluated in FY 1993 and the project was not economically feasible at this time. Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At IBandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract hopper dredge Westport removed 42,187 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Monitored the concrete retaining wall for deterioration. Initiated a letter report for repair of the wall. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Ihble 37-I for expenditures under Section 107 during the fiscal year. Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-433 (preauthorization): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See "Thble 37-I for expenditures under Section 111 during the fiscal year. 37-6 PORTIAND, OREGON DISTRICT 13. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. lIbrning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Adock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 55 days. 14. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $48,575; (See "hble 37-J). 15. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACII, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 fcet wide from ocean toa point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water nd mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 146,842 cubic yards of material was removed. The contract hopper dredge Westport removed 88,716 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Nehalem removed 58,126 cubic yards. 16. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 17 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 1986. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 239,641 cubic yards of material. A final report on a nine year study to determine potential impacts to the beach resulting from the extension of the jetties was completed. 17. SKIPANON CHANNEL,. OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was performed. 18. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean IPeninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of the north jetty was completed in 1965. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections performed. 19. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco fay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 37-8 PORTIAND, OREGON DISTRICT feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 356,593 cubicyards of material. The channel flusher Sandwick worked 15 days at the entrance channels to Winchester Bay. 20. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Tbtal length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in lhble 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. A contract for repair of lock gates 1 and 7 was awarded. 21. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high-tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous 37-9 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annul Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, lPort of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products arc readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 358,407 cubic yards. Studied cause of deterioration of the north jetty. 22. 7.5 MCY STANDBY TIME Existing project. The General Provisions of the FY 1993 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, PL 102-377, 102d Congress, state that "In fiscal year 1993 the Secretary (of the Army) shall advertise for competitive bid at least 7,500.000 cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume accomplished with government-owned dredges in FY 1992. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the Secretary is authorized to use the dredge fleet of the Corps of Engineers to undertake projects when industry does not perform as required by the contract specifications or when the bids are more than 25 percent in excess of what the Secretary determines to be a fair and reasonable estimated cost of a well equipped contractor doing the work or to respond to emergency requirements". Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: This requirement resulted in a 50 day reduction in scheduled work days for the Essayons and Yaquina, and the contracting out of 2,900,000 cubic yards. The projects dredged were Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA; Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR; Coos Bay, OR; Coquille River, OR; Chetco River, OR; and Rogue River, OR. 23. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishcry. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. IThe results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in 'Thble 37-M. 24. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chutetype spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an 37-10 PORI()TIANI), OREGON DISTRICT earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board was granted a FERC license in November 1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. Scheduled power- on-line is 1995. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Thble 37-M. 25. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 26. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 27. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental group, they 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court December 16, 1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On June 23, 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have b)een conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating alternative of operating the project without a conservation pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water during flood control operations. On July 22, 1992, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court to remove the injunction. A hearing was held on May 20, 1993, however the court has not rendered a decision. In FY 1993, Congress added $2,500,000 for design necessary to complete the project pending removal of the injunction. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Operation and maintenance during the construction phase of the project, fishery evaluation studies, and water quality analysis. 28. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a sub-agreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility.The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Talble 37-M. 29. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tobm River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tbm River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, 37-12 PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory water fowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and speci-' fications were prepared for construction of the Fisher Butte Waterfowl Impoundments. The plan includes creation of three impoundments (totaling 115 acres) by constructing levees and ditches, installing an irrigation supply pump and 8-inch diameter water supply pipeline, construction of overflow spillways, and installation of drainage culverts with positive closure gates. Procurement contracts for pumps, pipeline and culverts were awarded and construction was initiated under a cooperative agreement with the Bureau of Land Management. The non-Federal sponsor is the State of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The project is scheduled for completion in FY 1994. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long TIbm River are shown in 1hble 37-M. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorizatIon): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See TIhble 37-L for expenditures under Section 205 during the fiscal year. Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Con. gress, as amended (preauthorization): Construction of a bank protection project at Mill Creek, OR is discussed in Section 33. Construction of a bank protection project at Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR is discussed in Section 35. Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See lhble 37-L for expenditures under Section 14 during the fiscal year. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation: Federal costs for the fiscal year were: $240,615 for disaster preparedness; $7,416 for emergency operations; $18,082 for rehabilitation of non-Federal flood control works and field investigations; and $148,021 for advance measures associated with the Mt. St. Helens recovery effort. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year costs were $184,817. Project modification for the improvement of the environ. ment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public Law 99-362 as amended: Construction of a waterfowl impoundment at Fern Ridge Lake, OR is discussed in Section 29. See Thble 37-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 68 leveed areas and 262 bank protection works are inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Of the 68 levee areas inspected during the fiscal year, two were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $150,447. 32. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,600,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,500,000. 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 33. MILL CREEK, SALEM, OR Location. On the right bank of Mill Creek at the southeast fringe of the city of Salem, Oregon, near the junction of Interstate Highway 5 and State Highway 22. Mill Creek confluence with Willamette River is about 3.7 miles downstream of the project. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damage to public works. Project consists of construction of three riprap groins along the upstream and middle portion of the eroding bankline, excavation of a portion of land area downstream of the groins, and extending the existing riprap revetment 250 linear feet upstream to the groins. This action will prevent the outflanking of the right abutment of Hawthorne Avenue Bridge and provide acceptable flow alignment to the bridge. The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and construction of the project was $205,471, of which $154,103 was Federal and $51,368 non-Federal. The non- Federal cost includes cash contributions of $31,031 and the value of $20,337 for lands, casements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD). Local cooperation. The City of Salem, Oregon, the non- Federal sponsor, provided lands, casements and rights-ofway. In addition, the City of Salem participated financially in accordance with the cost sharing requirements of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Fiscal completion of the project. 34. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include 'Ibutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. non-Federal cash contribution is $3,690,000 and the estimated non-Federal land, casements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Fish and wildlife mitigation studies, real estate activities and preparation of as-built drawings continued. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 35. SANDY RIVER, CITY OF TROUTDALE, OR Location. Located within the Troutdale city limits on the left bank of the Sandy River between the Interstate 84 highway bridge and the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, approximately 11 miles cast of Portland, Oregon. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damage to public works. Project consists of construction of 600 feet of embankment fill and revetment stone to stabilize the bank and to protect both the Interstate Highway 84 bridge abutment and the City of Troutdale sewage treatment ponds. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $598,930, of which $442,600 is Federal and $156,330 is non-Federal. The non-Federal cost includes cash contributions of $146,865 and the value of $9,495 for lands, easements and rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD). Local cooperation. The City of Troutdale, Oregon, the non-Federal sponsor, provided lands, casements and rightsof way. In addition, the City of Troutdale participated financially in accordance of the cost sharing requirements of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were prepared and a contract for construction of the project was awarded on July 2, 1993. Construction is scheduled to be completed in FY 1994. 36. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by Doug- 37-14 P'ORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT las County, OR (Galesville), and one municipal power project operated by lThcoma City Light (Mossyrock). The projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of.1944. The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County project and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $23,806. 37. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 apIp;1' s Estimated costs for all requirements of local coopcration under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 38. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, IIEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. The Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has withdrawn sponsorship. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Sponsorship coordination. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance per. formed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 39. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service road. way provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-N. Dam, original navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian stor- 37-15 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 age and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. Tb provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-scat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is $683,000,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, original navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. A cost sharing agreement between The Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 1989. Through September 1993, power generation totaled 224.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $511,984,110 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Correction of deficiencies of juvenile fish guidance efficiency at the second powerhouse to reduce fingerling mortality incurred during annual downstream migration was completed. Development of a portion of Steigerwald Lake for mitigation continued. Additional investigations to determine the scope of necessary environmental cleanup actions for Hamilton Island were conducted. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Plans and specifications for the first powerhouse transformers, switchgear, and main units rehabilitation were completed. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal year 4,308,869,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 4,275,660,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 40. COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVERS PORTS DREDGING, OR & WA Location. On the Columbia River from Bonneville Dam to McNary Dam Existing project. On a one-time basis, at full Federal expense, and without requirement of local sponsorship, maintain navigation access to, and berthing areas at, all currently operating public and private commercial dock facilities associated with the Federal navigation project on the Columbia River from Bonneville Dam to Umatilla, Oregon, at a depth commensurate with the Federal navigation project, and the Federal Government is exempted from any liability due to public and private facilities including docks adjacent to the access channels and berthing areas resulting from this maintenance. Sites identified for dredging under this authorization included recreational channels at Wind River, Mayer State Park, and Rock Creek State Park; recreational boat basins at The Dalles, Cascade Locks, and Bingen; commercial docks at Port of Morrow, Stevenson Co-Ply, Mt. Adams, Hood River Inn, Rock Creek Cove, SD&S, Mountain Fir, Bernert, Cargill, Biggs, and Roosevelt; commercial log storage facilities at Wind River, SD&S, and Government Cove; commercial channels at Hood River, McNary, Port of Skamania, I lerman Creek, and Little White Salmon. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cleanup of hazardous materials. 41. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISII MITIGATION PROGRAM (The Dalles Project), OR AND WA Location. The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This program encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District. Existing Project. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Act (P. L. 37-16 PORTIAND), OREGON DISTRICT 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of approximately $25 million for the design, testing, and construction of fish bypass facilities. Funds for FYs 1988, 1989, and 1990 were expended on a project by project basis. However, the mitigation program starting in FY 1991 is to be considered one project and funds will be appropriated and expended as such. The program will consist of juvenile fish mitigation facilities and a detailed mitigation study to be prepared in cooperation with regional interests, for juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for the Columbia and Snake River dams in the Portland and Walla Walla Districts. The plan of improvement at The Dalles Dam includes submerged extended fish screens and bypass system and a crane and maintenance facility. The total estimated Federal cost for work at The Dalles Dam is $121,500,000. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design activities associated with preparation of a feature design memorandum for extended length screens was completed. Procurement and testing of prototype screens continued. Activities associated with preparation of a feature design memorandum for juvenile bypass facilitics continued. 42. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles cast of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a rregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1993 power generation totaled 3.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville power Administration, $21,970,354 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $114,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 159,992,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 159,169,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 43. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project, begun in May 1947, was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were llaced in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1993 power generation totaled 19.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $68,368,007 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 547,583,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 544,381,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing 37-17 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Thble 37-M. 44. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Yshaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1993 power generation totaled 8.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $53,857,330 was reimbursed to the U.S. I'keasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Fosteror Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 330,294,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 328,069,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Thble 37-M. 45. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1993, power generation totaled 4.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $21,166,421 was reimbursed to the U.S. TYeasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 174,802,000 kilowatt-hours of clectrical energy were generated at project, of which 174,243,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 46. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and 37-18 PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acrefeet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Ihble 37-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete, Lock rehabilitation, work begun in FY 1980, was completed in FY 1986. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent complete. Through September 1993 power generation totaled 258.1 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $356,493,211 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $513,168,000, consisting of $512,835,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on modifications to the fish bypass system. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 9,104,734,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 9,086,912,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Rehabilitation: Work was completed on rebuilding (to strengthen) eight turbines, installation of the new control system to increase reliability and case of operation of the powerhouse, and on the station service improvement contract which will allow black start up of the powerhouse. Final major contract for rewinding of 5 generators continued and is scheduled for FY 1996 completion. 47. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam isabout 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating clam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide- gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000- kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project, initiated May 1947, was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1993 power generation totaled 15.6 billion kilowatthours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $73,860,101 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Studies to rewind/uprate the generators continued. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 483,234,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 482,411,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THEII ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 48. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project, initiated July 1967, is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1993, power generation totaled 4.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $26,974,400 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in mannerand toan extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 279,283,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by the project of which 275,748,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in 'lable 37-M. 49. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in 'Thble 37-N. Major construction of project, initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lbase agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Scufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1993, power generation totaled 257.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $344,350,609 was reimbursed to the U.S. "teasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 37-20 PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Further rccreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-Federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Studies to rehabilitate the fishwater generators and generating units 1-22 are continuing. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,003,530,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 6,985,908,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. General Investigations 50. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,700,516 of which $311,748 was for navigation studies, $1,256,147 for flood damage prevention Studies, $890 for Environmental Services Partnerships, $111,649 for miscellaneous activities, and $20,082 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $95,165 were expended of which $87,369 was contributed by the International Port of Coos Bay for the Coos Bay navigation study and $1,656 was contributed by the State of Oregon for dredged material disposal studies. 51. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Manage- 'ent Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private Sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 582. Fiscal year costs totaling $132,133 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $23,308; ITechnical Services $79,692; Quick Responses $4,195; and a special study for Portland Metro $24,938. Contributed funds in the amount of $6,140 were expended for technical services. 52. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR and WA The authorized plan includes land management, acquisition, and river access facility development for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River, Oregon and Washington. Public Law 100-581 Title IV designates 21 sites on Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day pools for treaty fishing use and authorizes the acquisition of 6 additional sites on Bonneville pool from willing sellers. The law specifies the construction of access roads, boat ramps, dock sanitation, fish cleaning facilities, and others at these locations and provides additional authority for facility improvements at five sites currently administered for treaty fishing access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Fiscal year work consisted of completion of plans and specifications for Phase I which consists of four earlyaction sites on Bonneville pool and of the Phase II Evaluation Report. Fiscal year expenditures were $462,868. 37-21 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 to In Text Sep.30, 1993 1. Bonneville Navigation New Work Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. ChetcoRiver, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 19,298,000 38,949,000 32,440,000 18,889,000 168,278,30750 29,331,438 38,867,937 32,423,462 18,900,338 167,936,391so 19,298,000 38,949,000 32,440,000 18,889,000 168,278,000 30,987,600 38,864,327 32,417,676 18,960,239 168,093,566 382,047 489,000 342,000 340,000 373,100 500,675 341,065 328,748 8,928,540 10,496,000 8,844,097 10,588,846 10,887,000 11,899,000 10,888,793 11,741,316 2,043,7131 2,043,713' 7,435,673 7,423,400 28,349,3042 28,349,3042 315,121,2963 314,945,7803 665,954' 665,954' 941,252 941,252 60,902 34,000 54,872 38,263 16,000 16,528 53,064 250,000 256,000 51,247 249,278 258,564 31,000 28,034 4,000 723 6,386,150 6,410,000 7,774,000 5,331,186 6,183,847 6,571,092 7,761,894 5,343,357 281,411 315,000 208,000 111,000 256,750 335,274 206,931 94,447 50,000 16,000 36,226 15,798 4,022,087 4,017,641 220,2835 220,2836 5,920,877 5,917,584 24,913,661* 24,913,661' 132,648,835' 132,595,696" 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,5090 5,989,509* 13,063,359' 13,035,700' 66,000 52,024 37-22 PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See T'otal Cost Section Project Funding FY90 FY91 1Y92 FY93 to In Text Sep.30, 1993 9. Coos Bay, OR New Work (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 13. Port Orford, OR Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,990,266 4,776,500 3,595,000 3,814,000 2,934,530 4,777,143 3,630,859 3,660,691 204,043 511,000 638,000 335,000 188,056 525,445 636,419 339,017 7,841 11,114 7,000 7,743 7,000 5,418 98,000 77,423 29,750,09210o 29,750,09210 92,657,718"1 92,451,813"1 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 693,36612 693,36612 7,382,98713 7,382,98713 367,364 367,364 1,052,717 1,027,005 758,692'4 758,69214 227,888 237,000 290,000 408,000 227,326 235,425 281,764 397,748 4,298,217 4,276,438 15. Rogue River Harbor At Gold I3each, OR 16. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. ' Cost Major Relhab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 592,874 1,025,000 944,000 994,000( 565,743 1,050,034 929,545 1,005,977 473,285 884,000 781,000 763,000 452,345 896,203 789,737 732,768 37-23 4,156,25215 4,156,25215 14,121,3941' 6 14,116,32116 635,783 635,783 29,502,212 ' 29,502,2127 14,900,384 ' 14,868,201e 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding IFY90 FY91 FY92 1Y93 to In Text Sep.30, 1993 17. Skipanon Channel, New Work 18. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 19. Umpqua Rivcr, OR 20. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 21. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 22. 7.5 MCY Standby Time 23. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 24. Blue River Lake, OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 120,050 119,727 9,000 3,149 143,792 3,596,000 132,773 3,535,492 19,000 21,311 -45,000 15,405 1,191 8,000 18,627 677,204 1,291,000 869,000 1,180,000 642,729 1,317,613 874,091 1,160,367 571,995 620,000 664,000 734,000 539,137 624,494 684,759 710,047 692,556 1,601,500 1,603,000 2,126,000 644,105 1,648,282 1,602,679 2,038,446 1,154,000 441,415 425,000 519,000 556,000 435,982 425,054 511,520 546,733 OR 37-24 280,854 280,854 3,505,064 3,502,247 22,434,827'* 22,434,827'' 6,726,08220 6,725,1332 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,8772' 17,718,87721 28,951,093 28,927,790 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,00522 520,00522 19,066,81823 19,033,3522-3 234,794 234,794 19,242,04624 19,242,04624 34,617,75825 34,527,95525 12,005 12,005 1,154,000 91,642,489 91,642,489 6,159,115 ' 6, 135,532' 32,038,225^ 32,038,225" PORTIAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding IFY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 to In Text Sep.30, 1993 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 26. Dorena Lake, OR 27. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 28. Fall Creek Lake, OR 29. Fern Ridge Lake, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection OR & WA 33. Mill Creek, Salem, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 34. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 145,308 147,000 182,000 238,000 139,048 144,629 178,433 230,545 731,610 622,000 434,000 598,000 ' 723,552 575,680 487,367 585,253 512,171 418,000 411,000 522,000 513,852 380,554 418,433 543,752 1,190,000 2,054,000 1,110,000 550,000 1,445,595 1,732,568 1,226,541 747,616 434,256 510,000 616,000 522,000 419,192 470,766 663,086 527,537 61,000 6,000 156,900 60,840 '4,823 149,437 719,564 744,000 912,000 840,000 701,482 750,600 919,406 827,935 75,000 86,000 25,000 24,832 38,684 137,000 140,393 1,531 18,900 ,516,000 1,-100 23,000 45,084 62,000 18,536 -9,600 -15,100 1,203 -15,092 12,131 15,131 11,567,000 1,824,000 12,507,990 1,695,82 536,658 115,463 149,240 389,000 396,000 305,000 383,937 389,294 311,716 37-25 3,208,299 3,187,883 4,013,12327 4,013,12327 12,558,28828 12,520,94728 14,568,26229 14,568,26229 8,079,460 8,050,485 104,444,579 104,393,096 22,118,26430 22,118,26430 7,228,671 7,210,678 8,750,8353' 8,742,0353' 17,219,19832 17,183,720"2 75,000 21,067,745 20,997,001 175,800 175,800 31,031 31,031 111,719,000 111,664,157 3,649,240 3,649,240 1,090,000 1,084,947 REPORT OF TilE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 to In Text Sep.30, 1993 35. Sandy River New Work City of Troutdale, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 37. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR 38. Willow Creek Lake, OR 39. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 40. Columbia and Snake Rivers, Ports Dredging, OR and WA 41. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles Project), OR and WA 42. Cougar Lake, OR 43. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR 44. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 86,000 34,897 27,965 35,039 10,000 3,818 -25,000 30,800 82,000 67,732 30,000 14,332 490,051 432,000 470,052 457,792 4,115,000 3,851,145 12,090,262 11,967,851 3,911,000 3,888,349 12,153,300 12,417,302 27,400 445,20(0 32,311 289,078 146,865 48,608 10,000 4,575 56,000 93,000 61,566 77,043 25,000 40,420 420,000 412,532 2,716,000 2,888,142 13,393,000 13,161,143 37,000 37,248 409,000 401,943 4,693,000 3,644,484 14,277,000 14,162,891 1,290,000 784,239 5,630,000 196,000 5,587,370 128,587 1,343,000 3,804,000 6,700,000 1,114,175 3,434,045 6,514,078 795,480 913,000 920,000 1,042,000 743,983 860,144 989,556 1,017,213 1,569,935 1,720,000 1,699,000 1,875,000 1,575,262 1,597,219 1,811,308 1,831,455 1,932,671 2,118,000 1,981,000 2,270,000 1,926,322 2,072,319 2,038,785 2,232,324 482,600 325,207 146,865 48,608 24,853,816" 24,848,39 13 4,015,709 3,990,152 37,260,114 37,260,114 4,308,051 4,280,010 780,831,6043 779,461,9623 215,176,66335 214,586,77535 1,290,000 784,239 5,826,000 5,715,957 11,847,000 11,062,298 58,636,3933 58,636,393" 15,943,29649 15,883,3519 62,729,698 62,729,698 35,114,707 7 35,041,002" 363,086 363,086 84,005,7883' 84,005,788 a' 33,876,8033" 33,828,309" 37-26 PORTILANI), OREGON I)ISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section Project Funding IFY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 to In Text Sep.30, 1993 45. Hills Creek Lake, OR New Work A C ."tnn 41n' 46. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 47. Lookout Point- I)extcr Lakes, OR 48. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 49. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. , Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 524,108 627,000 601,000 739,000 529,110 612,945 606,010 737,248 145,000 100,501 123,266 10,113,768 11,045,300 10,019,973 10,985,601 3,328,128 735,000 3,455,386 761,975 51,754 3,731 10,719,000 11,022,000 10,906,494 10,674,129 2,134,000 2,073,299 2,535,000 2,574,972 2,991,027 3,468,000 3,265,000 3,566,000 2,976,150 3,333,658 3,399,006 3,518,176 2,888,918 2,996,000 3,149,000 3,296,000 2,957,551 3,039,651 3,114,685 3,230,620 986,000 1,477,796 229,789 8,114,362 8,214,300 9,700,000 9,856,000 8,154,857 7,921,077 10,024,491 9,478,630 45,700,619 45,700,619 11,281,375: 11,269,344" 512,400,24640 512,392,17440 156,644,72741 156,064,62341 30,940,128 30,907,704 88,238,39542 88,238,39542 55,130,63243 55,012,11443 136,408,150 136,408,150 37,072,71844 36,962,678" 303,260,2884 5 303,260,2884 5 141,375,67046 140,790,29348 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24, 20 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed roject. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. . Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washou gal 1Turning Basin; $227,98, I lood River Small Boat Basin; $157,41a), Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. l.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 16. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 37-27 _.__ REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,0)00 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 38. Includes $691,278 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 39. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43. Includes $696,278 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 44. Includes $691,078 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 47. Includes $639,778 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $564,378 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 37-28 'PORTIANI)(,) REGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA 2. Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02, 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 3. Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 1923 2 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Construction of a new navigation lock just south P. L. 9-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid PL 99-662 into Inland Waterways Tust Fund. CIHETCO RIVER, OR Tb provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doe. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess. 1 No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doe. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. ' H. Doe. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doe. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. Doe. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doe. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess. i 37-29 REPORT OF TTlEE SSEECCRREE TAROF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FORl FY 1993 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT IBAKER IIAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. fH. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Scss. H. Do. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Scss. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Scss. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CIIINOOK, WA AND HEAD 1OSFA ND ISLAND Jun 20, 1938 Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Hlarbors Committee Doe. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Sep 03, 1954 Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doe. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess.' COLUMBIA RIVER AT TIlE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore. 9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. HI. Doe. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Scss. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended II. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Scss. PL 98-63 COLUMBIA RIVER BIIETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND TIHE I)ALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doe. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doe. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Scss. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Scss. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, 11. Doe. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doe. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. i by 800 feet long. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, IIAMMOND, OR Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. COOS BAY, ORi Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Ii. Doec. 958, 60th Cong.,Ist Sess. H. Doe. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Scss. H. Doe. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. 37-30 TABLE 37-B (Continued) Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 4. Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Nov 5, 1990 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 37-31 Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable H. within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through H. Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to S.1 Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. 73( Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to S. Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. H. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, H. inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COQUILLE RIVEIR, OR l)redging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and H. removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. H. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end H. of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of S. North Jetty. 741 Construction, operation, and maintenance of Se recreation facilities. Ac For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille H. River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. )'IEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide H. and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth and 1st 50 feet wide. Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide H. and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 1st feet wide. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. S. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, H. 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER IIAROR AT GOLD) BEACH, OR 'wo jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. S. SIUSIAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. H. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed H. under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. S. Ser 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot H. extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north Fir and south jetty extensions. of Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and PL 2,500 feet, respectively. 10. Doe. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Doe. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Committee Print, d Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Do. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Do 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. Do. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. do. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. Doe. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Print, th Cong., 1st Sess. c. 4, Food Control t of 1944 as amended Do. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' Doc. 202, 75th Cong. Sess. Do. 350, 77th Cong. Sess. Doe. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Scss Doe 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. Do. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. Do. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Do. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Committee Print, rial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Doe. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.' nal Report of Chief Engineers ,.96-367 11. 13. 15. 16. Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 REPORT OF TillE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17. 18. Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 19458 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 37-32 TABLE 37-B (Continued) SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad i. Doe. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. S. Doe. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging H. Doe. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay city. H. Doe. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. S. Doe. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long H. Doe. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging H. Doe. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. ocean bar. A short south jetty H. Doe. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging Rivers and Harbors Committee to a 26-foot depth. Doe. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth S. Doe. 158, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' dlock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doe. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. 5 S. Doe. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Do. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P 4374 H. Do. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. IH. Do. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. II.D o. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Do. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' 19. WILIAMETTE RIVER AT WILIAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. YAQUINA BAY AND IHARIOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. 20. 21. TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Dat Section AutI in Text Act Jul Jul 0 22. PIORT'IANI), OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION e horizing 24, 1946 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 2, 1992 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 4, 1993 May 17, 1950 Jul 9, 1990 Aug 15, 1985 Feb 25, 1993 29. 32. 33. 34. 35. Project and Work Authorized Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. 7.5 MCY STANDBY TIME In FY 1993 advertise for competitive bid at least 7.5 million cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume accomplished with government -owned dredges in FY 1992. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVERI LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. D)ORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK IAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL, CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction of waterfowl impoundments LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MILL CI1REEK, SALEM, OR Construction of three riprap groins and 250 feet of riprap bank protection. Documents S. I)oc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, EL 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 P.L 102-377, 102 Cong. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. PEL 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended HI. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. EL 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. Sec 1135(b), EL99-362 as amended OR AND WA H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended 1MTST. . IIELENS SEI)IMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. P.L 99-88 SANDY RIVER, CITY OF TROUTI)ALE, OR Construction of emergency bank protection. Saes ca. m1e4n, dFelodod Control Act of 1946 37-33 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, IIEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. IIONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE IIONNEVILLE, C Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by congress Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area EC. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Scss. )R AND) WA S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) See 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended P.L. 93-251 P.L 98-396 COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVERS PORTS DREDGING, OR ANDI WA Maintain navigation access to commercial dock facilities EL 102-104, 102d Cong., 1st Scss. from I3onneville Dam to McNary Dam COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (The l)alles), OR and WA Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities P. L 100-371 COUGAR ITAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure, Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. GREEN PEI',TER-FOSTER IAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938) Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. IHILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. Hi. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. EL 83-780 EPL. 87-874 11. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. P.L 858, 80th Cong. 2d Sess. II. D)oc. 531, 81Ist Cong., 2d Scss. P.L 83-780 E C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Scss. JOIIN DAY LOCK AND DAM -- LIAKE UMATILIA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation See 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doe. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. LOOKOUT POINT - DIEXTER IAKES, OR Earth-and-gravel filled clam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 1HD. oc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended 37-34 37. Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 38. 39. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 07, 1974 Aug 22, 1984 Aug. 17,1991 40. 41. 42. Jun, 1988 43. 44. May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 24, 1965 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 45. 46. 47. 4 lk PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. as reregulating dam. 48. LOST CREEK IAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Sep 21, 1962 Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct 15, 1966 Authorizes construction of project but not operation for P.L 89-689, Public Works irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Approp. Act, 1967 49. THIE DALLES LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified Inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-35 TABLE 37-B (Continued) REPORT OF TIllE:S ECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVIT1IES FOR IFY 1993 TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR . AstoriaTurning Basin, OR . Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR 1 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA 1 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR Clatskanie River, OR 2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA ' Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR 1 Deep River, WA 2 Depoe Bay, OR 1 Elochoman Slough, WA 2 Grays River, WA 2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR 1 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR 1 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA 1 Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR 2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR 2 Salmon River, OR 2 Smith River, OR 2 Skamokawa Creek, WA South Channel, Government Island, OR1 South Slough (Charleston), OR 1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or 12 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and \VA 13 Tongue Point, OR 1 Umatilla Harbor, OR 14 Westport Slough, OR 2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or 1 Yaquina River, OR 1 Yaquina River, OR Youngs and Claskanie River, Or Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR 2 Completed 2,000 26,237 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1991 1985 1975 1963 1971 1990 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1991 1985 1970 1939 1957 1992 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1984 1979 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 1,589,231 350,238'1 277,436 6 329,423 15,384 145,588 5 18,64110* 2,500 519,090? 1,154,1620 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 0 302,00610 16,881 2,145 143,120 2.400 119,800"1 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 2,807,87620 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,695' 195,313 's 28,800 2,000 9,348 16,648 194,8964 2,152,914 1,474,036 32,768 196,864 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 436,185 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 749,694 ,1 34,449 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoncd dclue to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 20. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. 37-36 PORTIANI), OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed Port of Kalama, WA 1 Completed Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed Sauvie Island Areas A and 13, Multnomah County, OR Completed Scappoose Drainage District, ORi Completed Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA1 Completed Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed Total Columbia River Basin LEWVIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Comleted Cowlitz County, WAComleted COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA1 Completed Total Cowlitz River Basin 37-37 1939 1941 1942 1943 1940 1940 1940 1941 1941 1951 1939 1942 1941 1942 1942 1961 1940 1940 1939 1951 1942 1942 1951 1984 1946 1985 1939 1947 1985 1942 1940 1940 1940 1940 1943 1940 1942 1943 1939 1939 1985 163,397 163,291 69,724 574,123 25,609 25,609 161,381 258,795 26,810 169,542 240,939 33,080 25,773 18,789 158,419 91,652 61,186 39,475 77,7743 593,0344 241,148 99,844 47,662 1,623,505 3,991,558 178,885 5,289,833 133,778 61,263 504,6421 66,932 69,503 74,596 84,592 205,531 40,658 22,797 248,802 16,399,775 172,521 42,978 28,592 250,000 442,735 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF TIlE.ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA1 Hayden Island, OR Midland Drainage District, OR Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Vancouver Lake Area, WA Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Woodson Drainage District, OR Total Lower Columbia River B3asin WILIAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Whelton Ditch, OR Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Total Willamette River Basin ALL OTHIIER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR 2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR1 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 John Day River (West), OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR 1 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR 1 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR ' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR (a) Riverside Area Units 0) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive 1984 1977 1967 1967 1967 1971 1964 1961 1967 1954 1966 1981 1971 1973 1964 1960 1967 Inactive 3,131,944 1,661,367 363,000 65,345 304,794 236,860 304,511 1,499,186 35,265 593,945 154,0125 674,137 889,391 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 11,928,364 1,214,300' 276,700 39,624 3,678,731 Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1988 1986 1981 1985 1966 1948 1955 1952 1989 1960 1959 1960 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,845* 1,307,216 22,963 106,25013 127,800 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 42,158,000 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 37-38 PORTIAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep, 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR8 Completed 1939 143,263 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Completed 1971 968,71610 Rogue River, OR 1 Completed 86,230 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Completed 1960 288,447 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, VWA Completed 1985 435,00012 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR 1 Completed 215,939 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Completed 1961 176,351 Sumner Parker Airport, OR 1 Completed 92,500 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR 1 Completed 1984 121,273 Tualatin, OR Completed 1985 1,803,094 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR1 Completed 33,835 UJmatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR 1 Completed 1985 154,600 Utmpqua River and Tributaries, OR Completed 1952 428,881 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Completed 1952 45,677 West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR 1 Completed 1986 176,000 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR 1 Completed 30,000 Total All Other Flood Control 7,965,985 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sec. 14). $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, EP.L 80-85. See 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers(Scc. 205). FY 1960 AnnualReport, page 1887 43.. IEnxcclluuddeess $$2265,2,04010, cEomnetrrigbeuntceyd Relief Act Funds 8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds funds t ds9. Reported by Walla Walla D)istrict prior to 1974 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs 10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 project constructed by local interests. Government furnished sheet steel pile. 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 7 Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and 12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. abandoned due to flooding by the John Iay Iam pool. Includes 13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds. Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 37-39 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR IY 1993 TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114' Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate I)iking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, Or 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,0012 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,9923 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,)00 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 37-40 PORTIAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1993 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 314,945,780 343,295,084 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 315,058,862 343,992,911 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Tobtal All Funds 29,600,003 315,083,182 344,683,185 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Channels and Harbors (Section 107) Charleston Harbor, Coos Hay, OR 659 659 Columbia River, Kalama, WA 1 500 500 Coquille River, Bandon, OR , 27,951 27,951 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA a 126 126 Newport, OR 49,603 49,603 Port of Gold Beach, OR 12,600 12,600 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR ' 16,562 16,562 Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA 2 14,487 14,487 Yaquina River, Port of ToIlcdo, OR '204_25,054 TOTAL Channels and Harbors 147,542 147,542 Mitigation of Shore Damages (Section 111) Siuslaw River Near Florence, OR ' 7,247 7,247 Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, OR 1 ._ 34.873 TOTAL Mitigation of Shore Damages 42,120 42,120 1. Reconnaissance Study 2. Feasibility R eport 3. Plans and Specifications 4. Construction runus 5. Construction Completed 37-41 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR IFY 1993 TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 14 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Depoe Bay, OR Dec 1992 Depot Slough, OR Mar 1993 Lake River, WA Feb 1993 Skamokawa Creek, WA Nov 1992 Skipanon Channel, OR Jun 1993 Tillamook, OR Aug 1993 Yaquina River, OR Jun/Aug 1993 Youngs Bay, OR Dec 1992 TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 20 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet' Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland of water, is at upper end of canal basin. Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 General Electric Co. to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, 3. The dam is owned by private parties. which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (SEE SECTION 30 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205) Beaver Slough, OR ' Lakeside, OR I Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR ' Lower Grays River, WA ' Peninsula Drainage District #1, OR ' Scappoose, OR ' Spring Creek, Rockaway, OR ' Sheridan, OR Springfield Millrace, OR ' Tillamook River, OR ' Umatilla River Water District, OR ' Warrenton Diking District, OR 2 Willamette River, OR TOTAL Flood Control 2,802 25,084 6,501 193 11,558 6,873 1,434 64 5,018 1,504 52,209 580 114,288 2,802 25,084 6,501 193 11,558 6,873 1,434 64 5,018 1,504 52,209 580 114,288 37-42 I'ORTIAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) (SEE SECTION 30 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR 578 578 Beaver Creek, Troutdale, OR 2 5,042 5,042 Mill Creek, Salem, OR 6 -15,092 15,131 39 Sporthaven Beach, Brookings, OR 2 4,691 4,691 Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR 4 289,078 48,608 337,686 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR 2 27542 27.542 TOTAL Emergency B13ank Protection 311,839 63,739 375,578 Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135) Fern Ridge Lake, Long Ibm River, OR 149.437 TOTAL Project Modification for Improvement of Environment 149,437 149,437 1. Reconnaissance Study 4. Construction Funds 2. Feasibility Report 5. Construction Completed 3. Plans and Specifications TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. Acre/feet 23. Applegate Lake, OR March 17, 1993 5,480 9,550 24. Blue River Lake, OR March 18, 1993 5,990 16,750 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR March 23, 1993 1,270 2,500 42. Cougar Lake, OI March 18, 1993 8,410 49,770 43. Detroit Lake, OR March 18, 1993 20,910 102,430 26. Dorena Lake, OR March 18, 1993 8,250 10,310 28. Fall Creek Lake, OR March 18, 1993 4,660 27,050 29. Fern Ridge Lake, OR March 17, 1993 4,330 12,130 44. Foster Lake, OR March 26, 1993 13,230 36,480 44. Green PetLer ake, OR March 18, 1993 16,150 70,080 45. Hills Creek Lake, Or March 18, 1993 10,780 48,380 47. Lookout Point Lake, OR March 18, 1993 20,940 142,610 48. Lost Creek Lake, Or March 18, 1993 10,380 48,250,' 37-43 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WALake Bonneville (See Section 39 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WALake Umatilla (See Section 46 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK (NEW) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DI)AM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(NormalXAbove Mean Sea Level) IOWERIIANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to BedrockXSecond Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwatcr Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation 86 Feet 675 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 19 Feet Andesite March 1993 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 37-44 PORTIANI), OREGON DI)ISTRICT TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project SIPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPIIANT' Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA-- Lake Celilo (See Section 49 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal, Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SIPILLWAY DAM "lype Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Hecight (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPIANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units Concrete Gravity Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ae.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-45 __ ___ SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima River, inclu- IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA .................. 38-1 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ................... 38-2 3. Ediz Hook, WA ......................... 38-2 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA ..... 38-2 5. Friday Harbor, WA ....................... 38-3 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ........ 38-3 7. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA............ 38-4 8. Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA ...... 38-4 9. Lake Crockett, WA....................... 38-4 10. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA............. 38-5 11. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .. 38-5 12. Olympia Harbor, WA ..................... 38-5 13. Project Condition Surveys .................... 38-6 14. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .... 38-6 15. Quillayute River, WA .................... 38-6 16. Seattle Harbor, WA . ..................... 38-6 17. Swinomish Channel, WA ................. 38-7 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA 38-7 Beach Erosion Control 19. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA.............. 38-8 Flood Control 20. Clark Fork River, MT .......... ..... . 38-8 21. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization 38-8 22. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ................ 38-8 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 38-9 24. Lower Green River, King County, WA ........ 38-9 25. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ................. *9* *..38-9 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 38-9 27. Stillaguamish, River, WA................... 38-10 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north 28. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ................ 38-10 29. Wynoochee Lake, WA ..................... 38-10 Multiple Purpose Power 30. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ...................... 38-10 31. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA .. 38-11 32. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ......... 38-11 Miscellaneous 33. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization38-12 General Investigations 34. Surveys................................ .. 38-12 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 38-12 36. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ...... 38-12 Tables Tble 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 38-14 Table 38-13 Authorizing Legislation ............ 38-20 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 38-25 hble 38-D Not Applicable 7Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 38-26 'Ihble 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Power Projects ............ 38-29 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 38-29 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam ...................... 38-30 Table 38-I Project Conditions Surveys ......... 38-30 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ..... 38-31 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities- Public Law 99, 84th Congress ....... 38-31 of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; a mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long -38-1- _ I _ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin; and a navigation channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, extending 5,180 feet from deep water in Guemes Channel to the west shore of Fidalgo Bay (construction under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C). Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1977. Extensions completed in December 1964 increased lengths of both breakwaters to 470'. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1977.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. TiWo of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with Port of Anacortes, city of Anacortes, and navigation users. Channel condition survey was conducted. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; I & J Street Waterway, a channel 100 feet wide and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water for a distance of 3,200 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet.The small-boat basin expansion from 3,900 feet to 5,400 feet at Squalicum Creek Waterway and channel at I & J Street Waterway were constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction costs for these features are recorded in Table 38-C. Project was completed in October 1980. (For further details see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted. Routine coordination with Port of Bellingham and navigation users. Maintenance, contract: A contract awarded in late FY 1992 for balance of maintenance dredging of Squalicum Creek Waterway and I & J Waterway was completed in November. Cost of work was $120,007. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 16,400 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and periodic nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz IHook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats; mooring U. S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No.37- Ports of Port Angeles, Port Tbwnsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection and coordination with local sponsor. 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) - 38-2 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Existing project. 'taining dike extending from a point opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with four berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Maintenance, contract: A FY 1993 maintenance dredging contract for the Snohomish River channel and down-stream settling basin was awarded in September 1993. 463,000 cy of shoal material are to be removed by clamshell dredge with open-water disposal at an estimated contract amount of $1,388,870. $502,400 of the cost is funded by EPA for beneficial use of the dredged material resource to cap an EPA Superfund site at Eagle Harbor in Puget Sound. 5. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. 1,600-foot concrete breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Conducted an annual inspection of the breakwater site. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project (including navigation improvenemnts to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350-foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in 1981. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point turning basin; deepen two downstream local berths; and construct fish and crab mitigation. Remaining project features are: deepen and widen 3.5 miles of existing 30-foot river channel (36 feet deep and 300-250 feet wide); expand Elliott Slough turning basin; -38-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 deepen two upstream local berths; improve navigation aids; modify Union Pacific Railroad bridge; modify highway bridge fendering; remove two old highway bridge piers; and relocate utility lines. Construction is scheduled for completion in 1995. Estimated project cost is $64,000,000 ($41,900,000 Federal; $22,100,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 25-35 percent of improved project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised crab mitigation monitoring. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for railroad bridge modification. Coordinated with Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern Railroad, and Weyerhaeuser Company. New work, contract: A-E contracts covered crab utilization of mitigation sites and review of railroad bridge plans and specifications. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in the entrance channel in August/September 1993, removing 327,271 cy of material at a cost of $705,169. The Corps hopper dredge Essayons dredged in Crossover and Bar Channel Reaches in September 1993, removing 45,641 and 213,736 cy, respectively, at a cost of $526,377. An offshore erosion control berm using 375,000 cy of dredged sand was constructed adjacent to the South Jetty to nourish the near shore area at no increase in cost. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor was completed in August 1993, at a cost of $2,931,019 with 1,459,821 cy of material being removed. 7. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area, King County, WA, involves a 15-foot deep channel which consists of a 100-foot wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot long transition channel with a 24 o 30-foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot wide outer channel, 1,200 feet long. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nesting area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests during construction. Project was completed in March 1981. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with King County and navigation users. 8. KEYSTONE HARBOR, ADMIRALTY INLET, WA Location. Keystone Harbor is located on the west side of Whidbey Island across Admiralty Inlet from Port Townsend on the Olympic Peninsula. Existing project. The harbor was constructed by the Corps of Engineers in 1948 (Lake Crockett Project) and includes a dredged mooring basin, a Federal channel, a rock breakwater, and a boat launch ramp. The Washington State Department of Transportation (DOT) operates a ferry from a dock at the head of the mooring basin. New project changes authorized channel depth from -18 feet mean lower low water (MLLW) to -25 feet MLLW by dredging. Channel deepening allows ferry traffic to proceed without suspension of service which had been experienced in the past. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Washington State Department of "I'ansportation) is responsible for 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 4, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Advertised, awarded, and supervised construction contract. New work, contract: Channel dredging contract was completed in March 1993, removing 22,000 cy of material. 9. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay bya channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) Recreational facilities at project under cost-sharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: construct a 35-unit camping loop and restroom, new boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the - 38-4 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand day-use facility and add riprap at the construction site. Navigation improvement was accomplished under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. See narrative for Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA, in this report. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted during the year. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of 31,697 cy was completed in March 1993, at a cost of $185,983. Material was used to nourish adjacent eroding beach. 10. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in 'Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 15,900 commercial and 49,300 pleasure vessels, and 2,330,600 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed more than 150,000 fish and there were more than 906,900 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: Contract for repair of the large lock upstream service and guard gates continued. Contracts awarded during the fiscal year included: repair visitor center, install east boundary fence, rehab Stoney Gate valve set, modify control tower and operating houses. Total amount of new contracts exceeded $460,000. 11. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Anacortes Harbor, WA, $459; Neah Bay, WA, $183,690; Seabeck Marina, Hood Canal, WA, $191, a total of $184,340. In addition, $72,379 contributed funds were expended for Neah Bay, WA. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $41,995 at Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA. 12. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6462.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide; and construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, RL. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No.35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) - 38-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Performed continuous water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the seasonal periods of poor water quality. A surface inspection of the floating concrete breakwater confirmed the breakwater and anchor pile system to be in good condition. 13. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels, not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Costs for the fiscal year were $123,191. Tbtal costs to date are $3,244,664. (See Table 38-I.) 14. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous.to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bellingham are cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 2800 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 900 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $84,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill or recycled through other Government agencies. 15. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project sponsorship was transferred from the Port of Port Angeles to the Quileute Tribe Port Authority in 1983. Terminal facilities. There are 3 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. The agitation dredge Sandwick was used to dredge the entrance bar for the first time since construction of the project. The material proved too coarse for agitation dredging and only 643 cy of material were removed at a cost of $87,010. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel and boat basin was completed in March 1993, at a cost of $345,868 with 50,242 cy of material removed and deposited on the ocean spit as nourishment. 16. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay, the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, - 38-6 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. TIhrning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986 (see Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 31, 1985). (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/outfitting/ drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. 17. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with, Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but three of which are privately owned. Of these, one is used for handling general cargo, five are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; two are used for handling petroleum products; three facilities are used for log dumps; and two for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination with Port of Skagit County, Port of Anacortes, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Channel condition surveys were conducted. 18. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly - 38-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Maintenance, contract: A clamshell maintenance dredging contract for Bay Center entrance and channel was completed in August 1993 and resulted in the removal of 50,866 cy of shoal material with open-water disposal at a cost of $257,132. Beach Erosion Beach Erosion Control 19. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget Sound. Existing project. Initial beach nourishment consisted of the placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300 feet along the southwest beach. The fill extended horizontally 10 feet seaward of the wall, then sloped downward on a 1V to 5H gradient to intersect the existing groundline 65 feet seaward of the wall. 250 feet of rock revetment, at Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500-pound to 4,000-pound armor rock were placed on a 2-foot thick filter bed of quarry spalls, constructed with a 1V to 1.5H slope, a 10-foot top width, and a top elevation approximately 1 foot above the existing seawall. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest beach. Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of beach material to replenish the erosion loss approximately every 5 years, is an authorized part of the construction project. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial and periodic profile surveys, estimates of alongshore/offshore volumes of material, periodic beach sediment sampling, and pre- and postconstruction environmental monitoring. Initial construction was completed in December 1988. The first periodic nourishment is scheduled for late January 1994 construction start. Local cooperation. Under current cost-sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Seattle) provides 35% of total project cost including the costs of periodic nourishment and surveillance. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 15, 1988. Amendment No. 1 to the LCA for the periodic nourishment and surveillance is scheduled for execution in early December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued post-construction monitoring, prepared renourishment report, produced plans and specifications, and concluded all work to produce a supplement to the Environmental Assessment and Amendment No. 1 to the LCA.. Flood Control 20. CLARK FORK RIVER NEAR GARRISON, MT Location. The project site is located in Powell County, on the right bank of the Clark Fork River, about 2 miles upstream of Garrison, MT Existing project. The project consists of the stabilization of 800 feet of riverbank in three locations along a one mile reach of the right bank of the Clark Fork River. Work was accomplished by grading existing embankment to form a 2H to 1V slope, followed by a gravel filter and construction of a protective toe and blanket of riprap 3 feet thick. Excavated materials, high in metals concentrations, were disposed on site by spreading and covering with stockpiled topsoil. Project was completed on September 10, 1993. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (State of Montana Department of ITransportation) is responsible for 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on March 17, 1993. Operations during the fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications. Advertised, awarded, and supervised construction contract. New work, contract. Construction of bank protection by equipment rental. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA, $43,102; Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA, $19,627; Stillaguamish River (North Fork), Darrington, WA, $9,735. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 38-J. Emergency flood-control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antece. dent legislation.) See 'Table 38-K. 22. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, - 38-8- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. Stilling basin inspection was accomplished. Work continued on water quality and sediment surveys. Maintenance, contract: Contract for installation of additional right abutment piezometers was completed. Concrete repair work was completed on the spillway and tunnel. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Yakima River at Yakima, Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville and Sammamish River in Washington state; Lightning Creek, Coeur d'Alene, St. Maries and Placer Creek projects in Idaho; and, Clark Fork.River at Missoula in Montana. Fiscal year costs were $90,796. Costs to date have been $1,148,507. 24. LOWER GREEN RIVER, KING COUNTY, WA Location. The project lies wholly within the city limits of 'hlkwila in King County, WA. Existing Project. The project involves a Standard Project Flood (SPF) levee approximately 3.5 miles long. The downstream one third of the levee was constructed in an existing strip park along the levee alignment and the upstream two thirds is a conventional levee. Close coordination with the city of Tlkwila was necessary during construction to insure that the use of the strip park for rrereation would not be affected by the levee construction. Construction was completed in May 1992. Final fiscal accounting is underway. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (The City of 'IThkwila) will pay a minimum of 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. New work, hired labor: An operation and maintenance manual was prepared and provided to the local sponsor. 25. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles upstream and southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Flood control outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,600 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 245,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, a wading pool, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. Approximately 2,200 fish were transported from the fish collection facility. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contracts. Continued engineering during construction support for the new reservoir outlet tower and tunnel modifications. Work is scheduled for completion in FY 1995. New work, contract: Work on the contract for construction of a new reservoir outlet tower continued on schedule. Rehabilitation construction of an existing spring chinook salmon rearing pond was performed at Huckleberry Creek in August/ September 1993. 250,000 spring chinook were reared in the unrehabilitated pond in the spring of 1993. Both actions were implemented as partial fulfillment of mitigation obligations for intake tower construction impact. Major Rehabilitation. Major rehabilitation work which commenced in FY 1987 was completed in FY 1992. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells - 38-9 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $358,052. Total costs to date have been $3,096,159. 27. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Locwation. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to replace rock riprap bank protection along segment 11. 28. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. . Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, atTacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Removed brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. 29. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 authorized the Secretary of the Army to transfer the Operations, Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (OMR&R) of the Wynoochee project to the city of Aberdeen. The dam was built on a cost-share basis with the city which paid approximately 46% of the investment and the O&M costs. The legislation relieved the city of the O&M payment when it assumed the OMR&R, to the extent the city personnel does the work. The OMR&R was assumed by city of Aberdeen on July 1, 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Beginning July 1, 1990 the Corps' effort has been limited to quality assurance monitoring and water control assistance in flood control operations. Legislation has been enacted which allows fee title transfer of the Wynoochee Lake project to the city of Aberdeen. Fee title transfer to the city of Aberdeen occurred September 20, 1993. Multiple-Purpose Power 30. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. On Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia - 38-10- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, 'Itestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Contracts were awarded for debris facility shear booms and entrance road upgrade. 31. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Work continued to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Estimated cost of current construction project is $397,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included project security, data acquisition and control system, and turbine deficiency correction (units 17-27). Contracts completed during the fiscal year included station service governors and powerhouse interior painting. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Major contracts awarded during the fiscal year included seal spillway pier cracks, boat dock repair, and transformer repair. 32. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT, Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project is operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units.A fifth unit was completed in 1984 with capacity of 105,000 kilowatts, and there is a provision for three additional units. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded for joint seal replacement. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is completed; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment was limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is completed with units 1 through 5 operational. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. None. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 1982, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. - 38-11 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Miscellaneous 33. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662). Fiscal year costs were: Sammamish River Restoration, WA, $178; Wynoochee Anadromous Fish Restoration, WA, $37,929, a total of $38,107. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298). The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Major operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 27 acres, maintaining 6 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; follow up to the chemical treatment of 82 acres with the aquatic herbicide fluridone in Long Lake, WA (inspection, diver-operated dredge, bottom barriers); rotovating 100 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA; lake drawdown and inspection in Lake Chelan, WA; chemically treating 40 acres with the aquatic herbicide fluridone, and harvesting approximately 20 acres, at Columbia River, WA; and, chemically treating 17 acres at Wallace Lake, WA, and 240 acres at Swofford Pond, WA, with the aquatic herbicide fluridone. The FY 1993 work also included treatment effectiveness and carryover studies, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $300,247. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscalyearcosts were $446,081 for flood damage prevention studies, $6,795 for special studies, $279,881 for review of authorized projects, $170,584 for miscellaneous activities, and $43,079 for coordination with other agencies and non-Fed. eral interests, a total of $946,420. In addition, $104,966 con-. tributed funds were expended for review of authorized pro-. jects, Howard Hanson Dam Water Storage, WA, and $22,771 contn'ributed funds were expended for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $127,737. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computa. tions to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. lechnical assistance was Federal provided other and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $7,395 for international water studies, $158,208 for flood plain management services, and $3,931 for hydrologic studies, a total of $169,534. In addition, $13,472 contributed funds were expended for flood plain management services. 36. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Centralia, WA The city of Centralia lies in west central Washington at the confluence of the Chehalis and Skookumchuck Rivers, about midway along the Chehalis River from its source in the Willapa Hills to its mouth at Aberdeen at Grays Harbor. Floods of record on Skookumchuck and Chehalis Rivers occurred in January 1990. The plan of improvement authorized in PL. 99-662 would reduce flooding in the Skookumchuck River valley for the 22 miles between Skookumchuck Dam and the river mouth and along the Chehalis River downstream from Centralia for about 20 miles to Oakville. The improvement, as recommended in the feasibility report, consists of structural modifications (flood control outlet tunnel and spillway gate) which would enable the existing, private water supply dam to provide flood control storage during winter months. The 200-year flood on the Skookumchuck River at Centralia would be reduced from 13,300 cubic feet per second to 6,700 cubic feet per second (about a current 4-year flow). The 200-year flood plain would be reduced by 1,500 acres with water surface reductions of between 2 and 5 feet. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY1988 to refine the project design recommended in the feasibility report. In FY 1990, refinement of project design to less costly gated spillway sluice and reevaluation of hydrology, existing local levees and embankments, estimated flood damages, and potential flood reduction benefits were completed. Studies determined that the Skookumchuck Dam modification was no longer economically justifiable and thus lacked Federal interest. However, structural and non-struc* tural alternatives appeared to be economically justified. Since these potential projects were small enough, it was determined that further work should be pursued under the small flood control project program and that deauthorization of the Skookumchuck Dam modification should be recommended. In FY 1992 a letter report which recommended deauthoriza" tion of the dam modxlification project and a wrap-up report presenting results of the technical analyses were completed. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of activities to conclude PED. Fiscal year costs were $4,653. Tbtal costs to date have been $1,543,000. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. P'reconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) waS started in FY 1984. General Design Memorandum studies which resulted in design changes providing a significant re SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT duction in project costs while retaining essentially the same flood damage reduction benefits were completed in FY 1990. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated in February 1992 following passage by the city of Aberdeen of a bond , issue to fund the local share of project costs. The plan of improvement, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined in the plans and specifications, would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include segments of earthen embankment levee (2.0 miles) and steel sheetpile floodwall (1.1 mile), joining areas of high ground (1.2 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. The levee would protect 1,176 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Plans and specifications were completed and the review process initiated. The local sponsor, city of Aberdeen, began work on land acquisition activities associated with the project. Estimated PED cost is $2,555,000. Fiscal year costs were $619,736. Ibtal costs to date have been $1,995,271. La Conner, WA The town of La Conner is located on the eastern bank of Swinomish Slough, about 64 miles north of Seattle, WA. The La Conner Historical District is suffering from bank erosion and deterioration of wood pilings supporting overwater buildings. Erosion control and repair or replacement of the damaged pilings are required to maintain the structural integrity of the overwater buildings and prevent loss of the historic area. Construction of streambank erosion control measures necessary to prevent damages to structures in the La Conner Historical District was authorized by Section 603f, EP.L. 99-662 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, subject to the Secretary of the Army determining such work to be economically justified and environmentally acceptable. The improvement, as recommended in the Design Memorandum, involves placement of rock riprap along 1,660 feet of the Swinomish Channel bank at the La Conner Historical District, plus repair of about 60 piles. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1991 to resolve environmental concerns raised during review of the 1989 Decision Document, primarily regarding project impacts on juvenile salmonids. The Draft Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment for the project was submitted in 1991. The project design was modified to include benches in the rock slope to assist fish passage as well as creation of a strip marsh along a portion of the project. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included continuation of work on the final Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment, and continuing coordination with the local sponsor to develop a financial plan to finance the local share of project costs. Estimated PED cost is $183,000. Fiscal year costs were $38,446. Total costs to date have been $173,754. Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $1,310,000, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Tbtal costs to date have been $663,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Tbtal costs to date have been $5,670,000, $3,530,000 of which is now included in Cost and Financial Statement of this report. Project improvement by construction commenced in FY 1990. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. Yakima River at Union Gap, WA Tbtal costs to date have been $502,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. - 38-13- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY92 FY 93 Sep.30, 1993 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 260 - 286- 7,000 6,482 129,887 193,300 617,000 35,927 282,485 432,040 - 334,000 2,873 330,850 - - -- 31,800 1,362 29,272 35,000 5,182 189,( -30, -1,831 480,129 708,500 816,000 516, 486,811 606,592 669,147 714, 15,152 14,749 - 45,000 -- 32,643 12, - 38-14 - - 222,345 - 222,345' - 1,156,499 44 1,156,024 - 59,524 - 59,524 -- 5,000 -- 5,000 - 1,566,839 - 1,566,8392 - 2,273,256 025 2,272,395' - 29,421 - 29,421 - 9,103 - 9,103 - 5,878,740 - 5,878,740 000 1,501,860 869 1,501,273 - 385,850 - 385,850 - 163,765 - 159,388 -- 1,723,745 - 1,723,7454 000 11,955,807 068 11,905,035* - 116,618 - 116,618 - 584,090 - 584,090 -- 1,575,500 - 1,575,500* -- 73,952 847 73,888 - 1,267,881 - 1,267,881 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY92 FY 93 Sep.30, 1993 6. G. r. a. v/ s. H. ..a"- rbo.r. an.. d New Work Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA 8. Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Lake Crockett, WA 10. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Olympia Harbor, WA 14. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14,030,000 10,551,615 3,041,014 3,045,373 3,198,291 5,156,476 5,092,707 2,318,000 1,622,158 7,754,000 7,802,000 170,( 1,057, 5,501, 5,356, 4,561,000 396,000 571,000 336, 3,753,379 1,202,468 502,831 372, , - 344 - 344 51,500 36,803 21,750 6,718 44,200 62,711 31,655 49,260 - 7,500 - 7,371 7,000 6,000 43,000 45,334 9,038 6,465 D00 21,637,962 753 21,549,7777 500 108,750,841 103 108,536,8978 - 9,592 - 9,5929 - 4,606,145 -- 4,606,145 D00 5,864,000 980 5,831,65910 - 55,889 -- 55,889 986 147,000 110,220 73,250 53,328 69,614 159,000 15,674 212,926 946,000 946,000 444,344 444,329 299,200 262,403 135,693 115,771 377,990 377,99011 933,754 933,610 -- .- - 4,611,436 - - - - 4,611,43612 4,353,835 7,239,400 6,393,000 4,960,000 98,612,095 4,398,158 7,220,250 6,135,650 5,208,861 98,328,42713 - - - - 7,465,230 -- - - - 7,465,230 -- - - - 250,000 .. .. - 250,000 -- 9,400 - 9,397 10,400 6,633 3,795 590,928 695,520 890,000 864,000 580,994 697,751 857,511 915,433 337,709 337,70914 759,177 759,16615 43,337 43,337 21,174,750 21,162,96016 -38-15- TABLE 38-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY90 FY 91 FY92 FY 93 Sep.30, 1993 15. Quillayute River, WA New Work (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Clark Fork River, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost -- 525,236 402 524,627 - 520,000 -325 520,348 647,227 237,000 681,000 132,000 685,066 231,022 684,210 136,650 -- - 41,595 - -- - 41,595 - 206,820 331,700 81,218 459,582 2,300 160,600 5,863 163,948 57,411 -18,891 34,412 31,000 34,450 30,084 - - 1,386,955 S- 1,386,955' 9 52,640 521,000 14,375,736 48,240 525,283 14,375,50120 - -- 78,372 -- -- 78,372 -- 165,000 17,724 128,372 - -26 ,- - 42,036 15,170 - - - - 15,000 102,000 - - 13,591 69,076 - - - 34,000 - - - 13,127 - 38-16- 521,850 521,850"7 11,539,308 11,538,699 20,000 20,000 170,335 170,335 9,488,873 9,486,980 69,333 69,333 61,595 61,595 808,332 808,3321s 7,453,972 7,453,010 32,000 32,000 887,500 849,126 269,474 269,474 117,000 82,667 34,000 13,127 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY92 FY 93 Sep.30, 1993 22. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Lower Green River, King County, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 25. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Wynoochee Lake,WA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost - - - - 37,048,061 - - - - 37,048,061 685,628 720,900 842,000 1,364,000 15,390,329 788,180 645,685 717,555 1,467,604 15,274,41821 - - - - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000 204,000 430,000 176,250 61,009 - 84,250 4,223,000 3,343,165 1,066,322 1,141,473 10,800,000 11,550,063 1,247,200 1,175,095 240,000 634,574 43,750 107,067 6,913,000 6,841,950 1,384,000 1,390,453 13,743,500 1,000,000 274,000 13,311,323 1,343,118 409,294 1,974 -1,941 4,096 13,710,000 13,748,724 1,732,000 1,688,446 12,468 86,177 283,900 317,000 145,000 149,583 276,385 325,245 141,954 35,986 21,600 33,000 33,919 22,000 35,646 48,( 47,9 921,500 921,303 126,059 111,163 55,149,84822 54,963,19923 26,856,997 26,715,266 285,908 285,908 30,437,500 30,437,50024 3,928 3,928 134,595 134,59525 2,704,524 2,701,119 21,000 21,000 3,947,853 3,947,85326 750,367 750,088 54,405 7,007 23,494,445 23,494,44527 17,132,348 17,127,6082 )84 .. D,.- -- - 843 - - - _._ ,-, -- -.. 1,378,902 72,000 369,000 80,000 1,264,215 253,823 275,940 169,794 -38-17- REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY90 FY 91 FY92 FY 93 Sep.30, 1993 30. Albeni Falls Dam, ID New Work Approp. - - - - 31,741,561 Cost - - - - 31,741,561" Maint. Approp. 3,921,663 3,319,700 3,728,000 5,019,000 54,207,77030 Cost 3,970,757 3,294,401 3,642,283 5,040,072 54,035,476" 31. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work Rufus Woods Lake, WA Approp. 9,701,000 3,400,000 1,570,000 1,999,000 538,418,23532 Cost 8,576,556 3,857,685 2,031,600 1,359,623 537,535,98033 Maint. Approp. 9,479,470 9,947,156 10,009,000 10,254,000 136,762,53814 Cost 9,670,106 9,872,186 10,010,518 10,072,390 136,257,26211 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 297,630 Cost - - - - 297,630 30. ibby Dam - Lake New Work Koocanusa,MT Approp. - - - 543,858,440 (Federal Funds) Cost 312 1,089 60 - 543,858,44036 Maint. Approp. 4,081,223 3,851,200 4,405,000 4,674,000 54,001,002" Cost 3,999,702 3,851,003 4,318,921 4,729,051 53,758,40538 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 1,458,252 Cost - - - 1,458,252" 1. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 3. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 4. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. . Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous project. 6. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L98-8). 7. Includes $3,530,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 8. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 9. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 10. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 11. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 12. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended byState of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 13. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $32,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 14. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 15. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 16. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 17. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 18. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 19. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended forprevious projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 20. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 21. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of NEamvpigloabylme eWnt aters and $8,000 expended under Productive Appropriation Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 22. Includes $13,182,063 appropriated for original project, $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $41,880,000 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 23. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project,S87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $41,693,351 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 24. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $378,162 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8) 25. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 26. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 27. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 28. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $27,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (EPL9.8. -8). -38-18- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 29. Includes $30,769,614 for original project and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 30. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($53,172,574), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($860,420). 31. Includes funds expended for roject O&M ($53,000,280), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters c60,420). .. 32. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $393,932,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 33. Includes $144,338,252 expended for originalproject, $393,049,745 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 34. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($135,987,977) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561). 35. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($135,482,701) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561). 36. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 37. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($52,893,278) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,107,724). 38. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($52,650,681) and Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,107,724). 39. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. - 38-19 - REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. Navigation Channel. Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 BELLINGHAM HIARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. Channel 3,200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 18 feet deep in I&J Street Waterway. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment.Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHIOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HIARBOR AND CIIEIIALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dee. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. - 38-20 - H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 31, 1974. H. Doe. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 10, 1976. S. Doe. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 5, 1965. H. Do. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., PL 93-251 H. Doe. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doe. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. See. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. II. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 5. 6. June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19341 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. Breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. Westhaven Cove small boat basin. Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. Modify existing railroad bridge. KENMORE NAVIGATION CIIANNEL, WA Construction of navigtion channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800- foot-long transition channel with 240 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. KEYSTONE tHARBOR, ADMIRALTY INLET, WA Change authorized channel depth from -18 feet mean lower low water to -25 mean lower low water by dredging. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. AKE WASHINGTON SIHIP CANAL, WA Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as P.L 84-779 Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. OLYMPIA IARBOR, WA Channel 22-feet deep and 150-feet wide. H. Doe. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east Rivers and Harbors Committee and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep Doe. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. - 38-21 - Documents 9. 10. 12. SDeocc. u4m, Fenlotsod Control Act of 1944 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 7, 1979. EL 99-662 Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 7, 1980. Sec. 107, EL 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Nov. 7, 1988. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. 656-foot concrete floating floating breakwater and dredging of entrance and access channels and turning basin. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. Rivers and Harbors Committee Do. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized byChief of Engineers May 13, 1981. Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet H. Doe. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet H. Doe. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess long; moorage basin.3 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide S. Do. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. H. Do. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Do. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section H. Doe. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 19354 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended SWINOMISHI CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". H. Doe. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WILLAPA RIVER AND IIARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee and minimum width of 500 feet. Doe. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Rivers and Harbors Committee Channel from deep water in Palix River to BayCenter dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; 'ITokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and gravel nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing beach nourishment. Doe. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 103, P.L 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 18, 1983 CLARK FORK RIVER NEAR GARRISON, MT Construction of riprap bank protection. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. Se. 14, PL 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 10, 1992. H. Doe. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L 85-592 - 38-22 - Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 as amended July 13, 1892 14. 15. 16. July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 17. 18. 19. 20. 22. July 24, 1946 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 25. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized LOWER GREEN RIVER, KING COUNTY, WA Construct 3.5 miles of levees. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Documents Sec. 205, P.L80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 12, 1991. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 June 30, 1948 as amended June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Nov. 17, 1988 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. Transfer operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (OMR&R) to the city of Aberdeen, WA. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L 93-251 P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 100-676 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. PL 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 469, 82d Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 PL 94-587 PL 95-26 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction PL 89-789 personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. PL 90-2395 Design standards for relocation of Montana State PL 90-4836 Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. - 38-23 - 24. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. P.L 75-761 TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, section of city of Tacoma. WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. __ _ _ _ REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 19, 1970 Cong., 1st Sess., Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1988 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Included in Public Works Administration program. 3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. - 38-24 - Participation with State of Montana in construction, P.L 91-2827 operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded P.L 91-625 by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and P.L 91-611 sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation S. Doc. 29, 93d of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. PL 93-251 Construction of fish production measures to PL 93-251 compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for EL 93-251 prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary PL 93-251 County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage PL 93-251 Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Amends EL 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 PL 94-587 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect H. Doc. 1098, 1 Indian archeological sites exposed during course of P.L 100-676 operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. 00th Cong., 2d Sess. - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and PROJECT Status Report for Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA 1 Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)1 Blaine Harbor, WA Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA'1 Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Flathead River, MT Hammersley Inlet, WA . Hoquiam River, WA Kingston Harbor, WA Kootenai River, ID and MT Mats Mats Bay, WA1 Neah Bay, WA Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Port Gamble Harbor, WA Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Port Townsend, WA Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA'1 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Skagit River, WA Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA ' Tacoma Harbor, WA Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA'1 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 6. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 7. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 8. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 9. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 10. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 11. Mitigation of shore damages study. 12. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 13. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 14. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 15. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 16. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 17. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 18. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended and $1,147,208 contributed funds expended. 19. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 20. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. - 38-25- Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1966 1958 1923 1985 1987 1901 1950 1950 1967 1933 1970 1982 1913 1918 1960 1953 1928 1987 1985 1962 1950 1981 1982 1987 1981 825,2635 125,634s 346,650 274,397 1,619,956s 9,811 9,000 18,9219 262,57010 9,255 137,67912 2,057,266 63,879 4,491 470,873 11,911' 3 42,804 480,89914 1,461,590 2,575,091' 5 102,330 's 1,744,02517 2,383,891" 73,322 2,000,00020 - 7,693 224,756 10,683 5,316 5,00011 5,643 1,854,058 7,634 259 13,337 78,787 36,258 1,537,14919 378,378 I- - - REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA' Completed 1957 59,582 10,000 Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 -- Bitterroot River, Florence, MV Completed 1990 180,950 49,759 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT 2 Completed 1964 17,836 -- Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000 -- Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 -- Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 -- Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 -- Chehalis River, City of ChehalisRaw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 -- Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 -- Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 -- Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 -- Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 -- Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 -- Clark Fork River, Missoula, MV Completed 1978 31,548 -- Clark Fork River, Superior, MT Completed 1971 28,357 -- Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MV Completed 1950 27,947 - Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 24,728 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 -- Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 -- Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 -- Coffee Creek, WA3 Completed 1966 15,000 -- Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,862s 13,500 ightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 -- Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 -- Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 - Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 2,155 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 2,895 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA' Completed 1964 52,0406 - Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 - Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 - Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093 3,314 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA 1 Completed 1991 1,455,023 119,449 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 - Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 -- Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 -- Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 -- Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT 2 Completed 1955 26,265 -- Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT 2 Completed 1948 33,347 -- Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Deferred 1981 300,000' -- Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, M 2 Completed 1964 13,438 -- Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT * Completed 1950 2,320 -- Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Completed 1958 19,513 -- Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 - Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 - Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 -- Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 -- Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 -- - 38-26 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082 21,807 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 -- Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,0008 - Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 -- Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 - Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 - Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 -- Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 - La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 -- Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700 -- Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 -- Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450 - Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810 - Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,300 6,786 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,726 11,726 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 - Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant) 2 Completed 1965 50,000 5,339 Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 -- Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000 - Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1991 253,995 78,433 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 - Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 - Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 - Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,345 -- Nooksack River, WA3 Completed 1948 24,006 - Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 - Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,075 6,075 Nooksack River, Middle Fork,Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,000 -- Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 -- Okanogan River, WA2 Completed 1974 10,100 - Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1949 52,100 - Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1953 7.987 - Okanogan River, Omak, WA 1 Completed 1981 2,231,030 -- Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Completed 1982 1,787,630 - Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed 1948 25,401 - Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1985 81,000 -- Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1971 10,713 - Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed 1980 54,000 - Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed 1971 30,973 -- Placer Creek, ID Completed 1986 5,865,000 -- Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed 1964 11,291 -- Puyallup River, WA Completed 1937 50,000' -- Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 86,160 -- Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Completed 1981 125,000 -- - 38-27- REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Completed 1972 39,300 -- Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Completed 1981 208,000 - Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Completed 1961 15,928 4,843 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT 2 Completed 1974 49,657 - Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT 2 Completed 1973 31,565 -- Rock Creek Road, MT2 Completed 1980 50,000 - Rye Creek, MT2 Completed 1973 22,819 - St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Completed 1942 357,698 - St. Regis River, MT 3 Completed 1942 7,23410 -- St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT 3 Completed 1951 2,983 -- Sammamish River, WA Completed 1967 2,582,53611 696,923 Sauk River, WA2 Completed 1974 20,860 - Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 Completed 1989 119,600 32,778 Shelton Creek, WA1 Completed 1979 872,021 - Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Inactive 1982 1,934,792 -- Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Completed 1949 50,000 -- Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Completed 1966 46,489 -- Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Completed 1980 93,000 - Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Completed 1980 137,000 -- Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Completed 1963 40,753 -- Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Completed 1966 17,719 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Completed 1967 50,000 24,488 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Completed 1981 222,500 -- Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Completed 1969 44,227 -- Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Completed 1970 60,900 14,307 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Completed 1977 15,565 -- Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1961 16,437 1,960 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Completed 1963 11,433 - Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Completed 1989 122,138 79,311 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA1 Completed 1970 271,713 - Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Completed 1964 50,000 46,182 Stillwater River, MT2 Completed 1973 17,457 - Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT 2 Completed 1977 34,513 - Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Completed 1970 8,442 -- Tahola, WA2 Completed 1979 223,893 -- Upper Puyallup River, WA4 Completed 1938 71,49512 13,704 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Inactive 1982 508,13013 -- Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Completed 1976 111,072 - Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Completed 1969 50,000 21,311 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Completed 1972 50,000 4 -- Yakima, Yakima River, WA Completed 1948 381,961 - Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1949 8,047 -- Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1947 48,272 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Completed 1977 36,768 -- Yakima River, Yakima WA2 Completed 1983 125,5005- - 38-28- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended 4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 5. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 6. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 7. Preconstruction planning only. TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULT INCLUDINI For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report for 8. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 9. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 10. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration which is not available. 11. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 12. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 13. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967- 1972. 14. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Planning funds expended. 15. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). IPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, G POWER Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Construction Operation and Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WA 1968 1968 $25,00013 -- Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA 2 1958 1964 9,00013 - Entiat River, WA * 1958 1986 - - Methow River, WA 3 1958 1986 - - Okanogan River, WA 1958 1986 1,10013 - St. Regis River, MT 4 1958 1978 1,40013 Wenatchee River, WA 4 1958 1978 - - Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA 3 1980 1986 44,3001',14 -- Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68) 6 1973 1990 52,00013 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Unconstructed Portion) 6,7 1962 1990 - - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 6, 1933 1990 35,834 $35,834 Hammersley Inlet, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 4,9 1950 1978 -- -- Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA * 1948 1952 83,63113 Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45) 6 1973 1990 21,60613,1ts5 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (RH 45) 4 1960 1977 - Port Gamble Harbor, WA) (RH 35)4 1953 1977 - Quillayute River, WA(RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3,10 1986 1986 - Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3,11 1986 1986 - Skagit River, WA (RH 10) (Unconstructed Portion) 4,12 1950 1978 - Skagit River, WA (RH19) 4 1950 1978 - Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 6 1968 1990 54,46813 Spokane River, Spokane, WA 3 1939 1986 2,94413 Stillaguamish River, WA (RH 45) a 1946 1986 4,23416 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA 6 1978 1990 544,33113 1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. - 38-29 - TABLE 38-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 38-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L 93-251 dated 10. Dike with groins. March 7, 1974. 11. Settling basin at upper end of existing Duwamish Waterway, about 5. Authority for pprroojjeecctt eexiprieredd iinn OOccttoobbeerr 1952. 1.4 miles above 14thvenue outh Bridge. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b) (1), P.L 99-662 12. 5500-foot extension of training dike. dated November 17, 1986. 13. Preconstruction planning only. 7. 2200 linear feet of revetment at Point Chehalis. 14. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 8. 16 foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 15. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. 9. Deepening shoal area near Cannery Point from 10 to 13 feet. 16. Economic restudy only. TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 10) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 11/4 11/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill' Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the emergency 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 13) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Anacortes Harbor Lake Crockett Quillayute River Seattle Harbor, Duwamish Waterway Waterway connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay May 1993 March 1993 March, April, May 1993 May, June 1993 June 1993 - 38-30- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1993) Cedar River, Renton, WA 6,941 Chehalis River, Salzer Creek, WA 14,47812. Coeur d'Alene River, (North Fork), ID 1,1871 Flathead River, Kalispell, MT 17,013 Horseshoe Bend, WA 23,867 Long Road, FC. District, Chehalis River, WA 9,494 Nooksack River, Everson, WA 92 Nooksack River, Whatcom County, WA 27,456 Skagit River, West Mt. Vernon, WA 16,000 Skykomish River, Index to Monroe, WA 9,198 Trumbell Creek, MT 411 TOTAL $125,767 1. Terminated. 2. Excludes $14,478 contributed funds expended. TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1993) Disaster Preparedness $362,625 Emergency Operations 3,364 Rehabilitation 0 TOTAL $365,989 -38-31- WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. The primary tributary drainage area is the Snake River which includes more than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Nevada and Utah. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.. 39-1 Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects..................................39-2 3. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 39-2 4. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39-2 5. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works......... 39-2 6. Jackson Hole, WY ...................... 39-2 7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID .................... 39-3 8. Mill Creek Lake, WA.................... 39-3 9. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 39-3 10. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA ................. 39-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 11. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program ...................... 39-4 12. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID . ........ 39-5 13. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam -- Lake Sacajawea, WA .................... 39-5 14. Little Goose Lock and Dam -- Lake Bryan, WA 39-6 15. Lower Granite Lock and Dam -- Lower Granite Lake,WA............................... 39-6 16. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam -- Lake Herbert G. West,WA ................... 39-7 17. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA,OR, ID ........................ 39-7 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. A reconnaissance study was initiated for adding a new 18. McNary Lock and Dam -- Lake Wallula, OR and WA ............................. 39-8 19. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID .................... 39-8 General Investigations 20. Surveys.................................. 39-8 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 39-9 22. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ....... 39-9 Tables Tables 39-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 39-10 Tables 39-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 39-12 Tables 39-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 39-15 Tables 39-D Not Applicable rables 39-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 39-15 "Iables 39-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ......... 39-17 Tables 39-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 39-17 Tables 39-H Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ................. 39-18 Tables 39-I Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...............39-18 "ables 39-J Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment .................... 39-18 Tables 39-K Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID ..... 39-23 barge slip at Port of Walla Walla, Snake River, near Burbank, Washington. FY 1993 costs were $22,441. -39-1- ___ REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Flood Control 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Location. Improvements included in this project arc along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for the Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Thbles 39-B3 and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were deauthorized during FY 1993. 3. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $108,504 which included Salmon, II) ($93,435); and two new studies including the Portncuf River at Pocatello, ID ($5,069), and Soldier Creek, Camas County, ID ($10,000). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antece. dent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $190,101 for disaster preparedness, and $6,488 for emergency water supplies and drought assistance. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14,1946 Flood Con. trol Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $308,963 including completion of Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA ($281,599); initiation of three feasibility studies including the Snake River upstream of Blackfoot, ID ($8,053); Fort Hall Landmark, ID ($10,000); and Willow Creek downstream of LaCrosse, WA ($9,311). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Fiscal year costs of $11,709 for initiating two feasibility studies including Big Lost River upstream of Arco, ID ($2,223); and Little Weiser River upstream of Cambridge, ID ($9,486). Project modification for the Improvement of the Environ. ment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public Law 99-362 as amended. Fiscal year costs were $17,431 for Jackson Hole Project, WY. 4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. See Thble 39-I for inspections made during FY 1993. Fiscal year costs were $56,506. Total costs to September 30, 1993 were $2,739,502. 5. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS FY 1989 was the last year for expenditures on this program. The program is carried under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriations. 6. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On both banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, Wyoming. Existing project. On the Snake River, approximately 23.5 miles of Federally constructed levees consisting of the following. On the right bank - a series of levees, off-set levees, and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection from 10 miles up-stream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, a total of 13.5 miles. The left bank - a series of Federally constructed levees and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection, extending from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 5 miles upstream and extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream of the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, for a total length of 10 miles. In addition, a series of Federal and non-Federal constructed levees, with a total length of approximately 5 miles, most having some or full riprap) protection, are interspersed along both banks of the Snake River from Highway 26 Bridge to 4 miles downstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge. On the Gros Ventre River, approximately 2 miles of riprap protected levees on the left bank from 1.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge and extending to 0.5 miles cast of the same bridge. On the right bank, a series of levees extending from 0.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge to approximately 0.3 mile cast of the same bridge. Project authorized by Public Law 516, Flood Control Act of 1950 for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetments along the Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Public Law 99-662 modified the original Public Law 516 to provide that the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in - 39-2 - WALIA WALIA, WASIIINGTON DISTRICT any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Levee maintenance was performed by' Tbton County under the Local Cooperative Agreement. Monitoring of the Bald Eagle Management Plan was done by the Wyoming Dept. of Game and Fish. Work on the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement has been on-going throughout the year for an alternate quarry site and improvement of local access roads. Public meetings, environmental studies and solicition of comments from interested parties have been undertaken. A preliminary study of alternate levee construction methods was incorporated into the supplemental EIS. Emergency levee rehabilitation, annual levee repairs, and stockpiling of riprap rock were completed using fixed price supply contracts and equipment rental contracts. The Sewell Levee was repaired to its original shape and dimensions. Approximately 12,000 cubic yards of riprap rock have been stockpiled for future use. Fiscal year costs were $719,884. 7. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. Project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. (For details, see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed March 1955. Since 1955, $165,894,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During a detailed study of outlet capacity and potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on line for all units was on August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Contract for office remodeling completed. Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included the dam structures and recreation areas. Federally authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized FY 1990. 8. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an off-stream carthfill storage dam about 125 feet high above streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and diversion structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through city of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Recreation facilities were completed in 1966. (For details, see page 2005 of Annual Report of 1962.) Since 1942, $12,181,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Rehabilitation of the existing project was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1979. The plan of rehabilitation included action to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occured during each subsequent filling of the reservoir. A cutoff wall was constructed, but did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. (For details, see page 2006 of Annual Report of 1962.) Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 9. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control were accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and IHells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. - 39-3- REPORT OF THlE SECRETARY OF TlHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR I;Y 1993 Fiscal year costs were $312,990. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WA Location. Located near Kennewick, Washington at the mouth of Zintel Canyon in Benton County. Existing project. The project consists of a 90-foot high, roller- compacted concrete detention dam with an uncontrolled spillway and a fixed release outlet works at the mouth of Zintel Canyon, a 78-inch buried conduit (400-cfs capacity), 4,165 feet in length through town, channel improvements, and a culvert under the Burlington Northern Railroad. A flood dike plug across the Union Pacific Railroad protects downtown Kennewick when major flood flows occur. The dam and associated works will provide 100-year protection at the damsite and approximately 50-year protection through the city. The average annual flood damage reduction benefits are $1,040,100. The project was authorized by Public Law 298, 89th Con.- gress-Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was approved by the Assistant Sectretary of the Army (ASA) and signed by the city of Kennewick in July 1991. Funds were appropriated for construction in FY 1991. The project consisted of two parts (1) Channel which was awarded in January 1992 and (2) Dam which was awarded in March 1992. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors, city of Kennewick, Washington cost-shared 25 percent of the total project cost. Current estimated Federal and Non-Federal project cost is $9,700,000. The estimated Federal cost is $7,275,000. Operations during fiscal year. Both channel and dam contracts were completed. 11. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISII MITIGATION PROGRAM (Walla Walla Projects) Location. At Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the state of Washington and McNary Dam on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (a) Ice Harbor - submerged standard traveling fish screens, intake gate raise, new gantry crane, collection bypass facility; (b) Lower Monumental - submerged standard traveling fish screens, gate raise modification, gantry crane, collection bypass facility, and holding and loading facility; (c) Little Goose - gantry crane modification, gate raise modification, submerged extended fish screens, and holding and loading facilities lPhase I and II; (d) Lower Granite - submerged extended fish screens, two fish transport barges, gate raise modification, fish support facility, wet separator, barge moorage facility expansion, and gantry crane modification; (e) McNary - submerged extended fish screens, gantry crane modifications, collection and bypass facilities; transport holding and loading facility, gate raise modification, and extended screen rehab facility; (f) A mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives to mitigation for fish losses at Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The current total estimated full funded Federal project cost is $375,500,000. Ice Harbor bypass facilities were not initially authorized for construction under the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. However in FY 1989, Congress authorized expenditures to proceed with design of a bypass system. The mitigation study project was added to the President's FY 1991 budget. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Installation was completed on submerged traveling fish screens and contracts were awarded for the gantry crane and intake gate raise at Ice Harbor. Construction was completed on the holding/loading facility at Lower Monumental Dam. The gantry crane and intake gate raise designs are on hold pending completion of an emergency intake gate closure study. Contracts were completed for gantry crane modifications and submerged traveling screens at Little Goose Dam. Contract for gantry crane modification was completed and designed for new wet separator is pending results of system configuration study at Lower Granite Dam. Construction is completed on gantry crane modifications and work is continuing on the contract for the collection/bypass and holding/loading facility at McNary Dam. The mitigation study is continuing with report expected in FY 1994. FY 1993 costs were $28,092,559. Tbtal project costs through FY 1993 are $103,622,597. - 39-4 - WALIA WALIA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 12. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 1600 and 1445 Mean Sea Level (MSL). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Dam structure is about 3,300 feet long and about 717 feet high above streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. Powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatt and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 40(),000 kilowatts. Provisions had been made for three additional 220,000 kilowatt generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts and a reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. However, environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 1990. Principal project data are set forth in Thble 39-J. Construction of the project started in July 1966 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $737,000 of potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1993 was 34.17 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Development of wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. During fiscal year, 1.47 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) operations were less affected by the IHNV disease than in past years due to the completion of the hatchery water supply line from Dworshak Reservoir. The 6,500 gpm received from the Clearwater Fish Hatchery line is sufficient to allow eggs and fry to be raised in IHNV free water. This is allowing the Dworshak Hatchery to finally rear fish on-site without transferring eggs to other hatcheries for hatching and early rearing, approximately 2,389,000 smolts were produced at DNFH, almost 90,000 more than the mitigation goal of 2,300,000 steelhead. The average size of fish was smaller this year with 323,305 pounds produced compared with 450,785 in 1992. For 1993 approximately 7.5 million eggs were collected from a return of 7,900 steelhead. A total of 2.37 million eyed eggs were shipped to Magic Valley and Clearwater fish hatcheries. DNFH also released 466,200 spring chinook weighing 27,384 pounds. Spring chinook returns were considerably higher in 1993 with 2,000 adults collected at DNFH and Kooskia National Fish Hatchery (KNFH). Some 3.3 million eggs were taken with an estimated smolt release of 2.5 million. The steelhead return to the Columbia River this year was down significantly from 1992. Only 189,000 were counted in 1993 compared to over 310,000 in 1992. These lower numbers carried over into the Snake River where 73,000 steelhead were counted compared to last year's record run of 160,000 steelhead. 13. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 435 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kilowatt units and three 111,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 610 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 391 MSL is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Thable 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955 and was completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1993 was 67.51 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded and completed for domestic water supply. Operation - 39-5- REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 2.03 million kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 3,508,987 tons during calendarycar 1992. 14. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lake Herbert G. West (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,655 feet long and about 165 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 498 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 feet by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide,14 feet deep and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and D)am. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in 1963 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1993 was 55.52 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract completed for turbine repair Unit 1. Contract continuing for units 2 and 3 turbine repair and fish pump turbine repair. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 2.46 million kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 2,921,135 tons during calendar year 1992. 15. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of backwater levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 Mean Sea Level (MSL) in Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Lower Granite pool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 60 feet wide and 60.5 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 38.0 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Ihble 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965 and was completed in 1984. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1993 was 46.74 billion kilowatt hours. Approximately $4,336,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented since the levees became functional. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded for fishway controls. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 2.69 million kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 1,861,347 tons during calendar year 1992. As the first collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite Dam is a primary component of the District's Juvenile Fish Trlansport Program. .Tbreagnasnp oinrt t he 1960's as a study of methods of bypassing juvenile steclhead and salmon around turbines of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became a routine operation in 1980 while other structural modifications, installation of screens, and development of bypass systems continue. The 1993 transport season was marked by the highest spring flows and spill in the Snake River since 1986. The hatchery spring/summer chinook and steclhead outmigrations were delayed due to the late issuance of Endangered Species Act Section 10 permits by National Marine Fisheries Service. Collection totaled 8,022,514 at Lower Granite Dam compared - 39-6 - WALIA WALIA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT with 6,911,174 in 1992 and 8,616,516 in 1991. After three days of over 385,000 fish collected per day, an all time record of an estimated 893,100 fish were collected at Lower Granite on May 7. High collection counts of over 300,000 fish per day resulted in 437,830 fish being bypassed back to the river at Lower Granite due to collection numbers exceeding raceway and barge carrying capacities. At Little Goose Dam, 2,003,734 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected, a slight increase from 1992. Collection peaked at 168,152 on May 9, Snake River flows exceeded 100 thousand cubic feet per second (kcfs) for part of the spring. At Little Goose Dam, collected juvenile spring/summer chinook were bypassed back to the river for 22 days as part of the fishery agencies' "spread the risk policy". For the first time ever, collected fish were released from raceways back into the river because large collection numbers at Lower Granite exceeded barge carrying capacities for several days in a row. A total of 673,713 fish in all were bypassed at Little Goose. 1993 was the first year of operation for the new juvenile fish collection facilities at Lower Monumental Dam. Delays in facility construction and initial facility testing resulted in fish collection starting on May 3. A total of 1,335,634 fish were collected with 954,934 fish being transported. Approximately 379,135 fish were bypassed back to the river for the same reasons as at Little Goose Dam. At McNary Dam, 6,647,268 fish were collected. Peak collection was 175,800 on May 5 when yearling fish dominated collection, and 372,066 fish on June 30 when sub-yearling fish comprised 99.6 percent of the collection. During the spring, flows were above 220 kcfs and 1,364,166 fish were bypassed at McNary Dam. High spill at all four collector dams in the spring of 1993 bypassed a lot of juveniles through the spillway. A grand total of 18,009,150 fish were collected, well below the record 22,261,661 fish collected in 1990. A total of 15,052,287 fish were transported, 83.6% of those collected. Of those transorted, 1,060,901 (7.0%) were by truck, and 13,991,386 (93.0%) were by barge. Because of the listing of Snake River sockeye as endangered, and Snake River chinook as threatened, the transport season went through the end of Occtober at all four collector dams. The transportation season ended two months early at McNary Dam to allow construction of the new juvenile bypass system.Traveling screens remained in the turbine intakes and project salvaged fish from the gatewells with gatewell baskets and released the fish into the river below the project. The construction of the newjuvenile bypass and transportation facilities at McNary Dam are scheduled to be completed by March 1, 1994. 16. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 3,800 feet long and about 135 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 508 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 483 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 61 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 553 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1993 was 68.60 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continuing for unit 3 repair, and fish pump turbine repair. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.58 million kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 2,995,001 tons during calendar year 1992. 17. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia and Snake River drainages in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas and purchase of offsite project lands for fishing and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple-purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Expansion, the Irrigon Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchcry, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery, Magic Valley Hatchery, Clearwater Hatchery and water supply are in operation. The compensation plan is 91 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $219,000,000. - 39-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Local cooperation. None required Operations during fiscal year. New work: Off-project land acquisition is 98% complete. Letter supplements are being prepared for development actions. Hatchery completion contracts are in place for the Powell, Crooked River, Big Canyon, Imnaha, and Wallowa satellite facilities. Transfer actions, whereby the Corps turns real property over to US Fish and Wildlife Service, are processed for Eagle Lab, Magic Valley, Red River, and Lyons Ferry facilities. Studies are in place for correcting water supply deficiencies at Irrigon Hatchery. 18. McNARY LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 340 and 335 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 7,365 feet long and about 183 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 291 MSL is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2,200,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 32 miles long is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in TIhble 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1993 was 235.29 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract completed for machine shop roof repair. Contracts awarded for fishway controls and purchase of fish tank trailers. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year, 5.75 million kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 6,729,418 tons during calendar year 1992. 19. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230 Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary for power, incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam -- Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam -- Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam -- Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Ihble 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slackwater reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. No costs were incurred this fiscal year. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of non-Federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study of the potential for im- - 39-8 - WALIA WALIA, WASIIINGTON )ISTRICT proving the system with levee raises, extensions, or relocations was completed in FY 1990. The final reconnaissance study was combined with the Jackson Hole Restoration study which was completed in FY 1992 and revised in FY 1993. A combined flood protection and restoration feasibility study is expected to start in FY 1994. Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control reconnaissance study was initiated to restore fish and wildlife habitat in the 500-year floodplain of the leveed reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson Hole, WY. The study has evaluated losses resulting from levee construction over the past 30 years and determined restoration measures to compensate for these losses. Certification of the report is scheduled for FY 1994. The Energy and Water Development Act, Public Law 102-104 authorized a study in cooperation with the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, for disposition of the current Walla Walla District Headquarters. The study was completed in September and forwarded to North Pacific Division for comments and review.We participated in the Columbia River and Tibutary Study, a survey directed by the North Pacific Division. Total cost of surveys was $318,838 for FY 1993, including: flood control studies ($98,138); special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, and Cooperation with States, ($22,503), Special Investigations, Inter Agency Water Resource Development and FERC Licensing Activities, and North American Waterfowl Management Plan, ($104,655) and District Disposition Study ($93,542). 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was ($85,055) which included: flood plain management services ($10,525), flood warning system ($2,025), technical services, ($68,628), quick responses ($2,912), and environmental data studies ($965). 22. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Little Wood River Project, Vicinity Gooding and Shoshone, ID. The Little Wood River Project was authorized by the Water Resource D)evelopment Act of 1986. The proposed project would have consisted of a diversion channel and two ponding facilities to divert floodflows from the Little Wood River into adjacent lava fields via the Dietrich and Milncr-Gooding Canals for the purpose of reducing flood damages in the Gooding and Shoshone, ID vicinities. As a result of lack of local sponsorship, the project is being terminated. A limited reevaluation paper was prepared and submitted to higher authority. Preconstruction engineering and design activities were initiated in FY 1990 to review and update the project formulation development in the 1976 feasibility report. A coordination meeting was held in Gooding, ID, on 29 May 1991 with the project sponsor. At that meeting, the sponsor indicated that they no longer have financial capability to act as project sponsor. A limited re-evaluation report dated July 1992 was approved by HQUSACE on 15 January 1993 which recommended termination of the study. The Division Engineer's "Notice of'TI ermination" was released dated 19 July 1993. Copies of the final re-evaluation report were distributed by letter dated 23 August 1993. FY 1993 costs were $8.04. - 39-9 - REPORT ITOHF'' E SECRETARY OF TI'lE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR VY 1993 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding IY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FIY 93 Sep. 30,1993 6. 'Jackson Hole, WY 7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 8. Mill Creek Lake, \V A 10. Zintel Canyon Dam, WAVA 11. Columbia River Juenile Fish Mitigation Program 12. Dwvorshak Dam & Reservoir, ID 13. Ice Harbor Lock & Dam,WA 14. Little Goose Lock & Dam, VWA 15. Lower Granite Lock & Dam, WA Newv Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Newv Work Approp. Cost Maint. App )rop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Ncw Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45,000 --- 41,075 50,000 34,120 379,000(1 777,5(10 493,000 139,306 668,270 713,204 --- 77,205 42,661 -- 77,205 42,660 17,431 947,000 719,884 42,681 34,139 2,483,270 2,480,896 2,796,500 2,673,919 ' 162,547' 154,004 19,652,081 2 --.. ..- 19,652,081 2 784,014 634,800 1,221,500 1.258,000 761,029 734,478 1,128,878 1,347.974 17,594,865 3 17,585,819 3 --- 2,258,495 4 --- 2,258,495 4 853,797 511,700 531,000 813,000 799,866 553,930 538,305 797,853 24 8,500 -1 8,500 310,000 4,899,000 1,050,0)0 306,025 4,859,972 1,027,263 - 396.820 268.117 --- --- 506.746 11,346,940 11,308,862 --- 17,714,107 --- 17,714,102 --- 6,259,000 --- 6,191,260 --- 664.937 --- 506.746 -2-1- ,136,000 28,152,000 28,869,000 78,157,000 -- 20,617,366 27,723,497 28,092,559 76,442,422 ---- 5,000 ----- 5,000 --- 329,528,296 * --- 329,528,296 * 6,408,122 6,365,300 7,802,200 7.399.000 87,479,857 6 6,102,810 6,534,885 7,748.991 7.674.875 95,433,073 1 99,000 387.310) 168,029,757 7 153,20)2 --- 168.0)29,757 7 5,358.025 6,806,900 8,019,500 6,766.()()0 95,792,40)4 5,169,866 6,474,349 8,330,550 6,908,833 95,598,924 * 4,043,0()0 5,071,935 233,361,022 * 543,004 ----- 233.361,022 , 3,711,324 4,290,400 5,655,000 5,313,000 72,286,129 ,o 3,572,515 3,883,098 5,191,554 5.571.138 71.522.310 ,o 1,958.000 1,997,535 374,836,315 " 1,257,307 .--.-- 374.836,315 " 5,547,966 5,330.900 8,421,000 6.826.000 96,128,468 12 5,310,080 5,436,731 8,464,239 6 898.866 96.007,934 ,2 -39-10 - TABLE 39-A (Continued) WVALLA WALIA, WASlIING''TON I)ISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30,1993 Maint Contri b. - --.--- --- 20,000 Cost --- --- --- 20,000 16. Lower Monumental New Work Lock & l)am, WVA Approp. 99,000 - --- --- 238,612,732 3 Cost 1,335,148 540,738 --- --- 238,612,732 ' Maint Approp. 3,961,605 3,930,300 6,380,000 4,689,000 71,654,437 '4 Cost 3,760,855 4,001,616 4,522,986 6,228,100 71,166,661 14 17. Lower Snake Fish & Wikllife New work Compensation. 1I), OR & W\VA Approp. 11,472,832 27,902,000 6,813,500 5,180,000 200,605,241 Cost 9,877,498 28,988,737 7,094,430 4,984,930 200,014,581 (Contributed FunLds) New Work Contrib. - --- --- 223,965 Cost --- --- --- 223,965 18. McNary Lock & l)D m. - New \VWork Lake Wallula. OR & \VWA,\ Appro p. 2,578,000 ----- 326,293,105 '6 Cost 2,231,198 505,723 ------ 326,293,105 '6 Maint. Approp 9,351,148 8,781,700 9,479,(100 10,455,207 197,104,170 16 Cost 8,897,860 9,076,330 9,501,861 10.091,026 196,368,718 16 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. - ---- --- 43,707 Cost --- --- --- --- 43,707 19. Snake Riveri)ownstIrcam New Work from Johnson B3ar Landing Approp. 6,199,000 13,333,000 16,110,00( 20 10.268,781 1,0154,986,370 17 OR, WA & ID Cost 8,791,928 15,630,347 15,893,070 20 9.844.884 1.154,148,638 17 laint. A\pprop. 18.59(0,284 201,358,500 28,494,501)0 23.587.000 336,453,377 18 Cost 17,815,413 19,799,683 26.516,385 25.606.845 334.877,276 ', 1. $39,000 of cost sharing funds from county were rcecivedc in FY 90, but were not expended until FY 91. 2. Inclucldes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3. Includes $66,700 allottcd and expenCded under Maintenance and Oeration of Dams and Other Improvemencnts of Navigable Waters. 4. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 a propriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation acilities at Completed Projects. 5. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expendcd by Departmcnt of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchcry operations. Includes $655,000 approprinled and CeXpended for additional unit. 6.Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by D)epartmenlt of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $48,182 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 1992 special recreation use fees included with O&M. Includes $949,400 al)ppropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7. Excludes $82,5100 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 a)propriated and expended for Code 711, Recreation Facilitics at Com pleted Projects. Includes $789,00)(0 aprprlriated and $788.999 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 8. Includes $48.919 appropriated and expended unlder Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 1992 special recreation fees included with O&M. Includes $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of )ams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 9. Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $12,006,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 10. Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of l)ams and Other Improvemnents of Navigable Waters. 11. lncludes $46,212.534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405.819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63.81))00 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilitics at completed projects. Includes $10,645,966 appropriated and $7,056,001 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 12. Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of l)aDms and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 13. Includes $51,661,371 appropriated anid expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,239,000 appropriated and $2,239,000 expended for Columbia River Juuvenile Fish Mitigation Programn. 14. Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of l)ams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 15. Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,778,00()0 expended for C.olunmbia River -39-11- REP)ORIT OF' TllE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR IY 1993 Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 16. Includes $28,851 appropriated and expended under special recreation use fees and $1,035,86() al)propriated and expel)cnded under Maintenance and Operation of l)ans and Otlher Improvements of Navigable WVaters. After FY 1992, Special Recreation Use Fees included with O&M 17. Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work aplpropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $1.67,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING I artificial spawning channel. 18. Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance o1" previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston)and $4101,019 aippropriated and $390,527 expended open river Pl asco to Lecwiston and Lewiston to Johnson liar Landing. 19. Adjusted to correct FY 1989 appropriation from 2,140,000 to 2,120,0001. 20. This does not include the appropriations and cost from the mitigation analysis under the Columbia River juvenile fish program which will be allocated at the conclusion of the analysis. LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act i'roject and Work Authorized l)ocuments COLUMIIIIA RIVER IIASIN, LO)CAL FIL)O1) PROTECTION PROJECTS May 17, 1950 lBlackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. 11. l)oc 531., Blackfoot River, ID). Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, lBoise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas C(reek, II). Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Dcauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. I leise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID).C hannel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthlorized in 1986. Jackson IHole, Snake River, WY. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID).R evetted levee. ILittle Wood Rirl, II). Flood protection in immediate area. DIeauthorized il1n9 65. MNalheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was d(eauthorized October 14, 1969. Mud lake, ID, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990. lPalouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Playctte Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below llack Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Plortncuf Rive'r and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channell thllrough Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID). Ilank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID)E.m ergency construction of lc\ccs and ricvctments. l)Deauthorized in 1986. 'lIton River, I)D. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tlomanlovich-Salrmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. \VWeiser River, \Veiser Area, II). Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levces, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. I)eauthorized in 1986. 81st Cong., 2nd Scss. -39-12- 2. TABLE 39-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act WALLA VALIA, WASINGTON I)ISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION I'roject and Work Authorized Documents Table 39-G Table 39-E Table 39-E Table 39-E IH. D)oc. 280, 89th Cong. 1st Sess. Oct 27, 1965 Scc 208, IEL8. 3-780 Authorized by Chief Engineers Sep. 3, 1985 Scc. 14, EL. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul 10I, 1985 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. l)oc 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Oct 27, 1965 Sep 24, 1954 Jul 24. 1946 Dec 22, 1944 ZINT'IEL CANYON I)AMI, WA. Local protectionI reservoir to provide flood protection to PL. 89-298. Sec. 201 plortions of the city of Kenncwick, \VA. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH NIIIGATION PROGRAM l)esign, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at EL. 100-371 lowe'r MonumeCntal, Little Goose, Lower Granite and McNary dams. (IIRUCES EI)I)DDY) I)WORSI[AK I)AM AND RESERVOIR, I) Preparation of detailed plans. S. Doc 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, H. Doc. 403. 87th. EPL. 87-874 navigation, power, recreation, and( area redevelopment. Cong., 2nd Sess. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. EL. 88-96 Dworshak Added Units 4, 5 and 6, ID. Units 5 and 6 were El.. 87-874 deauthorized in FY 90. ICE IIARIIOR LOCK AN) I)AM -- IAKE SACAJAWVEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, L.ower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doe. 704. 75th navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Cong., 3rd Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Scc. 4. Flood Control of 1944 facilities. -39-13- CATHI'ERINEi CRI'EEK LAKE, OR Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek near Union, OR. Project deauthorized 1990. CATHERINE, CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at city of I luntington Waste Water Lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVEIR, WA lrovides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. LUCKY PEAK IAKE, 11) [)am for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. l)cauthorized in 1990. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilitics. MilL CREEK LAKE, WVAILA \WALA, WA Off-strcamis torage project uistreIam fromWalla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concretelined channel. Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil U. Bennington Lake OWYIlEE RIVER, OR Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhce Rivcr. Thble 39-E 10. 11. EL. 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 EL. 94-587 Sec. 4. Flood Control Act of 1944 11. l)oc. 578. 75th Cong.. 3d Scss. H. l)oc. 719, 76th Cong. Scc. 377, EL. 77-228, Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 118. EL. 102-580 102nd Cong. Sec. 208. EL. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Enginecrs Feb. 11. 1985. Jul 24, 1946 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 as amended Aug 18, 1941 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 24, 1954 as amended Oct 27, 1965 Jul. 19. 1988 12. 13. Jul 3, 1958 Oct 23, 1962 Aug 15, 1963 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 2, 1945 )Dec 22, 1944 as amended _ ~_ _ 'REPORTO F TilE SECRET'ARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See D)ate Section Authorizing in Text Act I'roject and Work Authorized )ocuments 14. Mar 2, 1945 15. 16. Dec 31, 1970 Mar 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1945 May 25. 1978 Oct 22, 1976 as ammended Nov. 17, 1986 17. 18. Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 17, 1986 19. Jun 13, 1902 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Table E Aug 18. 1941 Table E Dcc 22, 1944 Table E Jul 11, 1956 Table E Oct 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 6. & Table E Nov 17, 1986 LITTLE,E GOOSE )LOCAKN DI DAM -- IAKE lRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and damn for II. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. D)esignation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. P 1 LO)WER GRANI'TE LOCK AND DAM, WA , Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and 1-1. dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DIAM -- lAKE IIHERHERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, I.ower Snake River project. Lock and dan for I. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 1)esignation of reservoir as Lake IHerbert G. West. P I LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILI)LIFE COMPENSATION PIAN, WA, OR, ANI) ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. P.. Changes to land acquisition authority. II. McNARY LOCK AND) I)AM -- LAKE WALLULA, OR ANDI) WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and 1-1. irrigation Construction, operation, and maintenance of SC recreation facilities. Construction, operation and maintenance of a second 1 1.i powcrhousc. NcNMary Second IPowerhouse automatically deauthorized Sec Nov. 16. 1991 SNAKE RIVER MNIOUTII 'TO JOIINSON BAR, OR, WA, ANI) 11) Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. fH. Mouth to R1iparia. 11. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson ar. Ri Do Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. L. 91-638 Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. D)oc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Scss. L. 95-285 .94-587 R. 6-PI.99-662 Dr)oc. 704., 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. . 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 R. 6- PL. 99-662 . 11)01. PL. 99-362 D)oc. 127, 56th Cong., 2nd. Sess. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. ers and Harbors Committce c. 25, 72nd Cong., 1st Scss. Supercedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only. 1I. I)oc. 70)4, 75th See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Cong., 2d Scss. Lower Granite Locks and l)ams. OTIIIER AUTIIORIZEI) FLOOD) CONTIROL PROJE C'I'S D)ayton, Tobuchet River, VWAF.l ood protection. I1. )oc. 662.76th Cc Milton-Frecwater, \\Walla \Valla River, OR .Flood Protection. 11. )oc. 719, 76th C lI cisc-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID. 11. Doc 452.77th Co Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement DI)istrict, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Esquatzcl Coulee, Connell, WVA. Levees and protective work PL. 84-685 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. P.1,. 87-874 Lapwai Creek Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee. Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization. "licannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID). Storage for flood control. PL. 89-298, Sec. 201 Jackson H lole. W\VY, Flood control protection by channel PL. 99-662 improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revectment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions are Federal responsibility. Little Wood River, ID). Flood protection )ng., 3rd Sess. ong., 3rd Sess. ng., 1st Scss. - 39-14- VWAIA WALLA, WASIHIINGTON D)ISTRICT TABLE 39-B AUTHIORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See D)ate Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized I)ocuments Table F IEWISTO()N-CIARIKSTON BRIDGE, 11)A NI) WA SOct 22, 1976 Four-lanc highway bridge and approaches. PL. 94-587 Dec 29, 1981 Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. 1I.. 97-140 Jul 30, 1983 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in El. 98-63 Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,()(000)). "Table G Nov 17, 1986 Blackfoot Reservoir, lBlackfoot River, II). Modification to PL 99-662 increase spillway capacity. Authorized Oct 1962, PL 89-298. l)eauthorized in 1986. Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, water EL. 99-662 supply, anadromnous fish, downstream and resident trout fishery, recreation and downstream power. Authorized Oct 1962, PI, 89-298. I)eauthorized in 1986. ITable G Nov 17. 1986 Cottonwood Creek Dam, II). Protection to highly- PI. 99-662 develop)ed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Oct 1962, P1, 89-298. I)Deauthorizcd in 1986. Tabic G Dec 22, 1944 Pullman, Palouse River, WVA. Flood protection. Authorized D)ecember 1944, HI.D. 452, 77th Cong., 1st Scss. )cauthlorized in 1986. Table G May 17, 1979 Stuart Gulch D)am, ID. Protection to highly-developed EL. 89-789, Scc. 201 urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Nov 7, 1966. Deauthorized in 1979. . PL. 89-789. TABLE 39-C OTHIIER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries Comnpleted 1968 1,851,195 above Celilo Falls to Kennewick. \V/\' 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John l)ay, and McNary projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asoti C k TnI ("mnleted 1951 12.019 \kIll n ;C t, b U ln l L,I Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID 1 Big Wood River, ID5 Boise River, ID5S Completed Completed Completed 1970 1985 1985 133,518 170,0(100 236,500 -39-15- REPOR()T OF Ti'llSEE CRET'ARY OF 1'11 ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVI'TIES FOR FY 1993 Catherine Creck, OR Completed 1990 28,800 TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep,.30, 1993 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Clear and 13lurnt River, OR Comnpleted 1990 99.500) Colfax, Palouse River, WA Complceted 1990 5.810,240 Connell, WAI Complcted 1967 60,000 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, I)2 Completed 1984 23,400 Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 Dry Creek, WA' Completed 1961 384,426 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA\', Completed 1967 232,792 Esquatzel Coulee, Mecsa, WA' Completed 1969 2,665 Gooding Area, ID Completed 1954 59,167 Graves Creek, ID' Completed 1953 75,469 Heise-Roberts Arca, Snake R iver. II) Completed 1955 1,575,838 Jackson Hole, Snake River, \VY Comnpleted 1978 2,388.27(0 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, I) Completed 1972 176.833 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River. 11) Completed 1973 113,296 Little Wood River, ID) 6 Completed 1993 235,1033 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, W,\' Completed 1972 17.592 Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 2310.315- Malheur Lake Project, OR Completed 1990 2,561,136- Malheur Improvement District. Snake River, OR Completed 1957 55.894- Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 1.786.753- Mission and Lapwai Creeks, II) Completed 1965 54,538- Orofino Creek & Clearwater Ri'er, Orofino, 1)2 Inactive 1949 23.)51 Owyhee River, OR Completed 1990 69.316 Rapid Creek, ID5 Conmplected 1985 19.5100 Pataha Creek, Ponicroy, W/\ 2 Co(.Ipleted 1977 111.815 Payette River, Emmett Sewage L.agoon. I)2 Comllpleted 1967 39,172- Riverside Area, Pasco, VWA Completed 1972 28.839- Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39.677.448- Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Completed 1985 7511,000- Shobe Canyon, Heppncr, OR1 Completed 1970 5.000- Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,71001- Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID)2 Comipleted 1952 8.5011- Snake River, Stevens, Bl3ackfoot, 11.) Completed 1968 32,425 - South Fork, Boise River, II)5 Completed 1985 44,4(100- South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, 11) Cr'ompleted 1973 61.055- Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID Cor."mplcted 1955 128.635- Touchet River, Waitsburg. WA' Completed 1973 72.140 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Completed 1971 73.932 Umatilla River, OR' Completed 1961 161.540 Wallowa River, Weaver 13ridge, 01R2 Comleted 1960 16.118 Weiser River, ID6 Completed 1985 1116.9(0 Willow Creek, ID' Completed 1963 976 Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37.168,114 - Yakima River, West Richland, \VA' ,4 Completed 1964 229,890 - Zintel Canyon Dam, WA 8 Active 1993 9.548.000 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, Pl 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers rrsuant to Section 14, PL, 80-858. 79-526. -39-16 - WALLA WVALIA, WASIIINGTON I)ISTRICT 3. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 4. Exclusive of $9,000 contributed funds. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 83-780. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to P L99-662. No TABLE 39-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MU INCLUDIN funds authorized until FY 1990. 7. Exclusive of $853,712 contributed funds. 8. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL. 89-298. Construction began in 1992. JLTIPURPOSE PROJECTS, 4G POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1993 Full report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge. I) 1990 23,085,832 TABLE 39-G I)EAUTIIORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full report Federal Contributed See Annual l)ate Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended A... rN .,n,, , Asotin Damn, Snake River, ID & \VA Blackfoot Reservoir, )ID Boise Valley, ID) Ada County Unit Canyon County Unit Camas Creek, ID) Catherine Creek Lake, OR Cottonwood Creek Dam, Bloise, II) Dworshak Units 5 and 6, 11) Grande Ronde Lake, OR Grande Ronde Valley, OR Heise-Roberts Extension, II) Henrys Fork Unit Little Wood River, ID Lower Walla Walla River, VWA Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & VWA Mill Creek, WA Mud Lake Area, ID Palouse River, WA Payette Valley, ID Portncuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek. 11) Pullman, Palouse River, \VWA S.Fork Clearwater River, 11) Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, 11) Teton River, ID TIbuchet River, WA Weiser River, Weiser Arca, ID Whitebird Creek, ID 1964 1980 1963 1963 1960 1978 1972 1990 1966 1958 1968 1960 1953 1988 1961 1991 1958 1957 1958 1960 1969 1964 1973 1974 1955 1957 1960 1957 1975 1986 1986 1967 1965 1990 1986 1990 1986 1986 1986 1965 1986 1990 1969 1991 1977 1990t 1986 1978 1969 1986 1986 1979 1986 1977 1990 1986 267,626 46,084 10,600 9,080 1.552,00 183.100t) 655,000 1012.458 27.800 21,334 4,000 13,000 3,537 5.994 2,000.)11 23.178 99,540 3,899 234,100 10.387 11,198 112,757 1.896 - 39-17- ___ REPORT OF TIlE SICRETARY OF TilE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS AC'T'IVITIES FO'()R IFY 1993 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) E,:stimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep. 30, 1993 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, )D Completed - 42,796 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, I) Completed - 59,942 Malheur River, OR Vaile Unit Completed - 325,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, I) Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,032' Shelley Area, Snake River, I) Completed - 32,335 WVeiser River, ID I)Deferred 1,565,000() 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridgc-Midvale )eferrcd - 75,000 'O'I'AL 10.801,740 1. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) Clearwater River, II August 1993 Lyman Creck, ID) August 1993 Mill Creek, WA October 1992 Portncuf River, I1) August 1993 Potlatch River, I) August 1993 Snake River, ID August 1993 Touchet River, WA July 1993 Tucannon Riv'er, Wi\ August 1993 Esquatzel Coulee, WVA September 1993 Walla Walla River, WA July 1993 South Fork Iliose River, 11) August 1993 Pataha Creek, WVA August 1993 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, ANI) IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 15 of Tebxt) SPILLWAY 1)AM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, WVidth by Height Number POW FRPILANT Ilength Gencrating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs 1613 feet "l'ainter 50 ft. by 55 ft. 2 428 feet 3 2 @ 90,000 kw 1 @ 220,000 kw -39-18- WA IA WALIA, WVASIIINGTON )ISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAI I)ATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION L.OCK, SPIILLWAY DI)AM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNI)DMENT (Continued) Project Ibtal Capacity Installed Space for additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Powcr-On-Line IMI'OUNI)MENNT Elcvations: Normal Operating Range Maximum lood Control Storagec Lake LCength Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 L.cngth of Shorelince NAVIGATION LOCK Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA Clcar Width (See Section 16 of ixt) Clear Length Lift: Miniminm Averagec NMaximum NMin imum W\Vater l)ep)th Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY D)AM 'T'pe of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: 'lyl)pe Size, Width by Hecight Number POW1IIRPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each ToIbtal Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Powver-On-Line IMPOUNDI)M N'T' Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximuin Lake Length lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width length of Shoreline 4(00,000 kw 3 3 @ 220,(000 kw 1,06(10,000 kw 150 feet March 1973 16)00-1445 feet 16(15 feet 2,000lt),l)00) ac.-ft. 53 miles 17,090 acres 175 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 1((00fe et 10)3 feet 15 feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850.000 cfs 391 fect Radial 50 ft. by 51 ft. 10) 671 feet 6 3 @ 90.((000 kw 3 @ 111,000k1w) 603,000 kw 226 fct Decembcr 1961 440-437 fect 446 feet 31.9 miles 9,200 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 80 miles -39-19- REIPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF TI'lllE ARMY ON CIVIl, WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAVAY DAM, IPOWERPLANT, AND IMIPOUNI)MENT (Continued) Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of IText) NAVIGATION LOCK Clecar Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water D)epth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY I)AM 'lype of Construction Completed M4axilmum Capacity Crest Elevaition Control Gates: 'l'pec Size, Width by Ileight Nu llber POWERPI! ANT Length \Vidth (3Cenertating Units: Number Installed Rating. Each 'totaCalpa licity Installed Maximium Structural HI-ecight First Power-On-Line Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 19 of iText) I M POUNI)MEINT Elevations: Norm al Operating Range NIaximumn Lake l.ength Lakc \VNater Surface \rca at Elevation 738 Navigation Chalnnel, l)Depth by \Vidth Lenlgth of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear WVidth Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Ma.ximu rn Minimum Water I)epthl Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPII.LWAY 1)AM lype of Construction (Comip)leted(l Maximum iCapacity Crest Elevation Control Giates: "Type Size, Width by H-cight Number 86 fcct 675 fcct 93 feet 98 fcct 101 feet 15 feet May 1971) Concrete Gravity January 19710 850,1101)00 cfs 581 fcct Rcadial 50) ift. by 60f It. 8 656 fect 243 fect 6 135.001k)w1\0 8(10,000) kw, 244 fIcct March 19701 638-633 fcct 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10.025 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 92 miles 86 fcct 675 feet 95 feet 1110fe0e t 115 feet 15 feet Mlay 1975 Concrete Gravity Febhruary 1975 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 5(1 ft. by 60.5 ft. 8 - 39-20 - WALILA WALLA, WASHINGTON i)ISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERIPLAN, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project POWERPILIANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structul'ral I ecight First Plower-On-Line Lower Monumencltal Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 21 of lxt) IMI )POUNi)MENT Elevations: Normal Opecrating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Chanmnel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length lJift: Miniimu I Average Maximu in Minimum Water l)epth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SI'ILLWAY DAIM ylpc of Construction Completed Maximium Capacity Crest Eleivation Control Gates: lType Size. Width by lHeight Number POWVERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Nunmber Installed Rating, Each 'Ibtal Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-L.ine I N 'POUNDI)MI NT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximlum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, D)epth by Width Length of Shoreline 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 38 miles 8,900(I acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 91 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 fect 98 feet 11)3 feet 15 feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 851)0,00c0fs1) 483 fcet Radial 50 ft. by 61 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000)) kw 242 fet MNIa1y96 9 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6,590 acres 14 ft. by 25(0 ft. 78 miles - 39-21 - 656 fcct 243 fect 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 feet April 1975 REPORT OFTIH iII SIECREITARY 'OTFII ' ARMY ON CIVIL VWORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILL.WAY DI)AM,I POWVERPILANI, AND IMPOUNDMENT" (Continued) Project McNary Lock andi Dam, OR and WA (See Section 22 of 'lTxt) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Lcngth lift Minimun Average MaximuN l Minimum Water D)epth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY IDAM 'lTpNC of Construction Compilcted Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by H [eight NL in ber POVERPIANT Length Generating Units: Numbter Installed Rating. Each 'Tbtal CapaIcity Installed MaximLuin Structural HeCight First Power-On-Line IMNP OUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lakc Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Acres Navigation Clhannecl, )eptlh by Width lcngth of Shoreline 86 feet 675 feet 67 feet 75 fcct 83 feet 15 fcct Novmber 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,21100,00cf0s1)1 291 fcct Vertical lift 50 ft. by 51 ft. 22 1.348 fcet 14 70.000 kw 980.000 kw 193 feet November 1953 3411-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38,80011 14 ft. by 2501f t. 242 miles 39-22 - WVALLA WALA, WASHIlNGTON IDISTRICT TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 23 of Text) IEstimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30 1993 to Sep. 30, 1993 Comrn- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Fish I3ypass Program Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Lower Monumental L..ock & D)am Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Tbtals Open River Lewiston to Johnson Mar Landing Open River Pasco to Lewiston Tbtals Existing Project 1 Previous Projects Pasco to L.cwiston 34,613 34,613' 34,613 0 1 0 .116.484,439 1.054,586.37(1 1.153,748.488 400,150 400,15(1 40(, 150 401,0192 4,350 336,266.807 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 1,116.884,589 1.054,986.370) l1.054,148,6386 336,453,377 334,877,276 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2. Includes $0 appropriated and $-92 expended in FY 1993 for project condition survey cost. 3. I)oes not include mitigation analysis. 4. Includes $203,000 appropriated and $201,931 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 5. Includes $370,00(0I appropriatcd and $358,589 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 6. Includes $1,628,000 appropriated and S 1.626.084 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 7. Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and S 1(1,949,493 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 8. Includes $13,333,000 appropriated and $13.136,097 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 9. Adjusted to correct FY91 appropriations from $2,259,0100 to $2,239,000. - 39-23 - 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 27,800,000 3- 195,04(0,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 254,355,022 321,5013,981 63,8(0 46,212,534 28,2.(0,(})()-,, 395.980,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 34,70(0,( 271.073.732 129,578,4804 914,256 36,748,21 8,779,695 176,020,4524 16(0,413,2155 60,941,807 18,0)83,491 239,438,5135 321,5013,9816 63,800 46,212,534 10,081,240 377.861,5556 184,712,3617 51,661,371 24,857,355 9 261,231,01877 129,578,48)04 914,256 36,748,021 8,733,833 175,974,5904 16(),413,215'5 60,941,807 17,604,633 238,959,6555 321,503,9796 63,800 46,212,534 1(1,072,648 377,852,9616 184,712,3617 51,661,371 24,552,937 260,926,6697 95,792,404 (0 1) 95,792,4014 72,286,129 00 72,286,129 96,128,468 10 1} (1 96,128,468 71,654,437 (1 7) 71,654,437 95,598,924 1) 0 0) 95,598,924 71,522,310 0 (1 71,522,310 96,00(17,934 0) 0) 1) 96.10017.934 71,166,661 0 71,166,661 100 100 100 111(1 31 901 1101011) 11)00 53 93 100 100 100 35 95 100 100 70 96 FY 57 FY 57 FY 71 FY 91 FY 63 FY 74 FY 89 FY 65 FY 84 FY 74 FY 88 FY 61 FY 75 FY 90 390.527 4,350 334.690.706 94 186,570 -- -- ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. EWPROVENIENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ................. 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK ........... 3. Cordova Harbor, AK ........ .... ...... 4. Craig Harbor, AK ..................... 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK -- ................. 6. Homer Harbor, AK .................... 7. Humboldt Harbor, AK .................. 8. Kodiak Harbor, AK .............. 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ................. 10. Mountain Point, AK ................... 11. Ninilchik Harbor, AK .................. 12. Nome Harbor, AK ..................... 13. Old Harbor, AK ....................... 14. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK....... 15. Project Condition Surveys ............... 16. St. George, AK - .-..................... 17. St. Paul Island Harbor . ................ 18. Wrangell Harbor, AK .................. Flood Control 19. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK ............ 20. Chena River Lakes, AK ...... ........... 21. Homer Spit Erosion, AK ................ 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-4 40-4 40-5 40-5 40-5 40-5 40-5 40-6 40-6 40-6 40-7 40-7 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,300-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project ....................... 40-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 24. Snettisham, AK ....................... 40-7 General Investigations 25. Survey .............................. 40-7 26. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 40-7 27. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design .... 40-7 Tables Table 40-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 40-9 Table 40-B Authorizing Legislation ........... .40-12 Table 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 40-15 Table 40-D Not Applicable Table 40-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 40-16 Table 40-F Not Applicable Table 40-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 40-16 Table 40-H Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....... . 40-17 Table 40-I Project Condition Surveys ......... 40-17 Table 404 Not Applicable Table 40-K Not Applicable feet and the extreme range is 42 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was completed for the port during July and August of 1993. The contract was completed by Manson Construction and -40-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Engineering of Seattle, Washington. A total of 229,358 cubic yards of dredged material was removed to a project depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water. 2. BETHHEL HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Bethel is located about 85 miles inland from the Bering Sea and adjacent to the Kuskokwim River. (See NOAA Chart 16006.) Existing project. Bethel Small Boat Harbor was authorized by Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbors Act enacted 14 July 1960 (Public Law 86-645) as amended. The project consists of a small boat basin of approximately 6 acres dredged to a depth of 4 feet below mean lower low water, a maneuvering and turning basin, and an access channel connecting the channel to the Kuskokwim River. The project originally included four finger-type berthing areas providing beach moorage for 1,200 small river boats and a future medium-draft moorage basin. The fingers were removed by local interests in 1986 and replaced with floating docks in 1989. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling deep-draft vessels serves for general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin area include publicly owned mooring floats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 18,411 yards of material removed from the end of March to the end of April 1992. 3. CORDOVA HARBOR, AK Location. Cordova is located on the Gulf of Alaska near the mouth of the Copper River, about 150 miles southeast of Anchorage. (See NOAA Chart 16710, 16709, 16700, and 16013.) Existing project. Adopted 30 August 1935 and 30 August 1964, providing construction of two breakwaters 1,100 and 1,400 feet in length protecting a 23 acre area, with an initial 8.27 acre basin by 10.4 acres to a depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water and construction of an entrance breakwater 183 feet in length. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include two docks for deep-draft vessels, the small-boat harbor, and a few piers associated with fish processing plants which are used by fishing vessels. Both municipal and city docks are owned by the city of Cordova, with the small boat inner harbor facilities being owned by the state but operated by the city. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with an estimated 8,500 cubic yards of material removed by the end of November 1992. 4. CRAIG HARBOR, AK Location. Craig is located on the west side of Prince of Wales Island about 200 miles south of Juneau in Southeast Alaska. (See NOAA Charts 17405, 17400, and 16016) Existing project. Adopted 2 March 1945, the harbor project includes a 3.6 acre mooring basin 225 feet wide and 700 feet long plus a 100-foot wide entrance channel in South Cove dredged to 11 feet below mean lower low water. Construction of two city owned and maintained rubblemound breakwaters to protect the expanded float system was authorized in 1979. The north breakwater is 160 feet long and the south breakwater is 300 feet long. Construction began in 1981 and was completed in 1983. Ical cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include a city owned dock, publicly owned docks for deep draft vessels, two small boat harbors, and several piers which support commercial fishing. Operations during fiscal year. Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 6,380 cubic yards of material removed from the beginning of December 1992 to the end of April 1993. 5. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. Dillingham Harbor is located at the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeast of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek with an entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek and a sill across the basin outlet. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city, and four publicly owned small boat floats are located in the project basin. Two docks are used by the city to unload barges which come into Dillingham. New floats for the harbor were installed in June 1982, they are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance was accomplished by dredging from the middle of May to the middle of June 1993. A total 84,967 cubic yards of material was removed. 6. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 -40-2- ALASKA DISTRICT miles by water, southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit, which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the most western segment of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the most eastern segment of the harbor; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The facilities consist of one publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled the size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract during September 1993. A total of 8,763 cubic yards was removed. 7. I-UMBOL HARBOR AK Location. Humboldt Harbor serves the city of Sand Point which is on Popof Island in the Shumigan Islands located 560 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA Charts 16540 and 16552.) Existing project. Adopted 20 September 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 27 October 1965 (P.L. 89-298); the project includes two rubblemound breakwaters, 640 and 995 feet long; protecting an area of approximately 16.6 acres; a 1,175-foot-long rubblemound diversion dike; an 810-foot-long diversion channel; and an entrance channel 1,200 feet long, 120 feet wide, and dredged to a depth of 18 feet below mean lower low water. Construction began in 1975 and was completed in 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Existing facilities include a small boat basin which provides protected moorage for 230 local and transient fishing boats, two docks for deep-draft vessels, and several piers which support commercial fishing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded in September 1993 for maintenance dredging of approximately 3,900 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel. Work is scheduled for completion in late November 1993. 8. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Location. The port of Kodiak is located 242 and 175 nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near Island Channel from Kodiak. Existing project. The recommended plan has a 1,865-foot rubblemound split breakwater with a crest elevation of 22 feet above mean lower low water. The main entrance channel is located in the split breakwater and has a design width of 200 feet and design depth of 20 feet below mean lower low water. Since the natural water depth of the main entrance channel is 55 feet below mean lower low water, no dredging is required in this channel. A 100-foot rubblemound stub breakwater is recommended next to a secondary entrance channel at the north end of the harbor. This secondary entrance channel is to be 100 feet wide with a design depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and will require 4,400 square yards of rock excavation. The current estimated cost of $26,243,000, of which $23,478,000 would be the Federal first cost and $2,687,000 is the non-Federal first cost (cash and land easement rights of way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years, resulting in an ultimate non-Federal cost of $5,218,000. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 6 July 1992. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers, wharves, and docks are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in Womens Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main water front of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven on Kodiak Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the St. Herman Small Boat Harbor between Uski and Near Islands, directly south of Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. Operations during fiscal year. The first contract, to place a consolidation pad where the main breakwater will be, was awarded on 11 September 1993 and was physically completed in September 1993. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. The existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound -40-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 breakwater 900 feet long. The new basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities consist of one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. The existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. The project is physically complete; contractor claims are pending. 10. MOUNTAIN POINT BREAKWATER, AK xLocation. The project is located within the Ketchikan Gateway Borough on Revillagigedo Island in Southeast Alaska. The city of Ketchikan is located approximately 250 air miles south of Juneau. Mountain Point is a residential area about 6 miles south of Ketchikan on the Tongass Highway. Existing project. The authorized Section 107 project consists of a 424-foot L-shaped rubblemound breakwater and a timber float. The existing local project consists of two ramps: a cast-in-place concrete slab extending 190 feet seaward from a parking lot to the 2 feet below mean lower low water level, and precast reinforced concrete planks extending 194 feet to the 5 feet below mean lower low water level. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The project was physically completed. A Local Cooperation Agreement detailing cost sharing of the project was signed with the Ketchikan Gateway Borough. Funds were received for construction. 11. NINTLCFIK HARBOR, AK I.cation. Ninilchik Harbor is located at the mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet. The community of Ninilchik, AK, is about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAiVNOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide was dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. The project was modified in the design stage to delete the pile jetty and revise the harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, these were completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Ixal cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in the project basin, provided by state of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 4,637 cubic yards of material removed during May 1992. 12. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. Nome Harbor is located at the mouth of the Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on the northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly jetty of 951 feet and the westerly jetty not exceeding 676 feet long, at the mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. The project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Con- -40-4- ALASKA DISTRICT struction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for offloading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 4,224 cubic yards of material removed in May 1992. 13. OLD HARBOR, AK IL-ation. Old Harbor is located on the southeast side of Kodiak Island 54 miles southwest of the city of Kodiak. (See NOAA charts 16592, 16580, and 16013.) Existing project. Adopted 15 June 1966, under Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, the project includes a small boat basin 200 feet mean lower low water, an entrance channel 600 feet long and 60 feet wide dredged to a depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water an earth filled dike 1,200 feet long to divert fresh water from Big Creek away from the basin area; and a gabion groin littoral drift barrier 240 feet long. Construction began in July 1967. Raising of the gabion groin structure was accomplished in August and September 1971. Ioal cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include a small boat basin which provides protected moorage for approximately 40 commercial fishing vessels and a city-owned dock. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in September 1993 for maintenance dredging of approximately 4,300 cubic yards of material from the basin and entrance channel. Work is scheduled for completion in early December 1993. 14. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Port Lions is located on the north end of Kodiak Island, approximately 19 air miles west of the city of Kodiak. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16594.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction for a small boat harbor at Port Lions on April 9, 1979. Construction consisted of a 600-foot-long breakwater, a 170-foot-long stub breakwater inclosing a 12- acre harbor. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 9.6 feet with an extreme range of 18 feet. A severe storm in November 1981 badly damaged the project. The repair work included replacing material of the existing main breakwater, extending the main breakwater 125 feet, changing the seaward breakwater slope to a 2.OH:1.OV adding a layer of armor rock and raising the design crest elevation from 18.5 feet above mean lower low water to 22 feet above mean lower low water. Minor dredging in the entrance channel to 15 feet below mean lower low water was also included. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A municipal timber pile dock at Port Wakefield serves as both a shallow-draft and deep-draft facility for Port Lions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project is complete. Contractor claim for differing site conditions were paid in FY 93. 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys were completed to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $493,957. (See Table 40-I) 16. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. The project was authorized in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, P.L. 102-377. The work consists of excavating the St. George Harbor entrance channel to 20 feet below mean lower low water in accordance with cost-sharing provisions in P.L. 99- 662. Local cooperation. The project is being done by the Local Sponsor under Section 215, P.L. 90-483 with reimbursement to the Local Sponsor by the Government for its share on completion. Operations during the fiscal year. The Local Sponsor began excavating in September 1993 and is continuing work through next spring. 17. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Iocation. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove, the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Existing project. A St. Paul Harbor project was P.L. 99- 662, based on a 1982 Corps of Engineers feasibility report. Since that report was published, new wave and climatic information was gained through field measurement and through a November 1984 storm that severely damaged a city built breakwater at St. Paul. American vessels have also assumed control of the groundfish harvest in the area more rapidly than expected, while crab stocks and catches have declined markedly. St. Paul also constructed 750 feet of breakwater and a 200-foot dock at the harbor site. On 31 March 1989, Assistant Secretary of the Army signed an -40-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Agreement under Section 204(e) of P.L. 99-662 which states that the government would pay 80 percent of the costs of general navigation features of the Authorized Project. The agreement was unique in that the city had to successfully build the harbor with their own funds and the government would reimburse them upon acceptance by the Corps of Engineers. The general navigation features consist of: (1) 1,050 feet of rubblemound breakwater with a finished elevation of 37 feet above mean lower low water; (2) 1,000 feet of rubblemound detached breakwater with a crest elevation of 18 feet above mean lower low water, and (3) a 200-foot-wide maneuvering area at a depth of 18 feet below mean lower low water. Construction commenced in May 1989 and was completed in December 1989. The city was reimbursed in March 1990 in the amount of $18,150,000. Local cooperation. A 204(e) agreement was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 30 March 1989. One minor item remains incomplete. The agreement was amended on 30 April 1992 to allow the local sponsor an additional 5 years to complete the inner harbor facility. Operations during fiscal year. The general navigation features were completed in 1989 and accepted by the government. Coordination was performed with the city for compliance with the PCA. A condition survey was completed in fiscal year 1992. 18. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the northwest side of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. The project consists of a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor, a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about one foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing of small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor was accomplished by contract in October of 1993, yielding approximately 10,000 cubic yards of material. The harbor was last dredged in 1968. Flood Control 19. BETHELI BANK STABIlIZATION, AK Location. Bethel, AK is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of Anchorage. Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads are threatened by erosion. This includes 3,500 feet of unprotected riverbank and 3,000 feet of previously installed bulkheads. Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement detailing the cost sharing requirements will be required. Termninal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo dock is at the upstream end of the project. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were approved on 21 October 1993. 20. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. Chena River Lakes is located in the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, Dl, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal costs is $210,000,000, Little Chena Dam was submitted for deauthorization in September 1990. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in September 1993 for installation of ten relief wells between stations 355 +70 and 442 +25 downstream of the dam. Work is scheduled for completion in late June 1994. A -40-6- ALASKA DISTRICT contract was awarded in September 1993 for a public parking area near station 215 +0 on the upstream side of the dam. Work is scheduled for completion in late June 1994. The flood gates were not operated for flood control in fiscal year 1993. The Government expended $5,800 of Construction, General funds to repair areas of permafrost degradation on the Tanana River levee. The work was performed by contract. 21. HOMER SPIT, AK Location. The project is located near the town of Homer, Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. It is a 4.5 mile long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards wide extending into Kachemak Bay. Existing Project The authorized project, which is being designed, consists of rock revetment along 1,100 feet of project cost was received. Local Cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. The local share of project cost was received. Operations during fiscal year. The contract was awarded on 21 September 1992. The contractor spent the year trying to get an approved quarry. Notice To Proceed was given on 12 November 1992. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress,and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $133,923 for disaster preparedness, emergency operations, and rehabilitation. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). 23. INSPECTION OF COM IED FIDOD CONTROL PROJECTI Inspections were made of flood control works at Fairbanks, Bethel, Galena, Gold Creek, Lowell Creek, Salmon River, Skagway River, and Talkeetna River, Alaska. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Pbwer 24. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. The project is located at the mouth of the Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 29 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage, which was completed in 1977, tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, which is nearly completed, provided a tunnel to Crater Lake and added a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13 foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400 foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground power house at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction tapped Crater Lake (elevation 1,002 feet) to drive a third turbine installed in the existing underground powerhouse. An additional nameplated-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts was added. Estimated cost of the first stage and second stage construction is $148,284,000. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. The Remote Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Contract (SCADA) was completed in September 1993. A successful lake tap occurred on 21 October 1988. Power-on-line initially occurred in May 1989, but was shut down for repairs to the turbine and generator. It has since been brought back on line. General Investigation 25. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys include $1,083 for Coordination Studies and $4,777 for Miscellaneous Activities. No funds were expended for Flood Control Projects in FY 1993. 26. COLLECFlON AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance, and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, state agencies, ArchitecturayEngineering firms, lending institutions, and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $124,124. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $17,901. 27. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SITKA HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Sitka is located in southeastern -40-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Alaska, about 95 miles south-southwest of Juneau. It is situated on the western coast of 1,600 square mile Baranof Island. Sitka is about 20 miles from the open Pacific Ocean on the east side of Sitka Sound. Existing project. The recommended plan, also known as the Channel Rock plan, will consist of three rubblemound breakwaters constructed across the northern end of western Anchorage, and an inner harbor facility placed adjacent to Thomsen Harbor. This project will create a large protected harbor in which moorage basins could be developed using minimal or no wave protection structures. The three breakwaters would be 480 feet, 1,200 feet, and 320 feet long. Navigation openings in the breakwater, 325 feet and 190 feet wide at the design depth, would be located at natural channels where water depths are 50 to 55 feet at mean lower low water. Two gaps would allow for vessel traffic separation, which may be particularly important when log rafts or barges are being towed through western Anchorage. The two breakwaters forming the southern opening will overlap to minimize ocean swell in Thomsen Harbor. The breakwaters would be placed directly on the submerged rock reefs forming the northern boundary of western Anchorage. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement is expected to be executed in December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the plans and specifications and negotiations on the Project Cooperation Agreement continued. -40-8- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK 3. Cordova Harbor, AK 4. Craig Harbor, AK 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. Homer Harbor, AK 7. Humboldt Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Kodiak Harbor, AK New Work Approp, Cost (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost 1,636,355 994,680 1,636,750 1,069,549 585,647 560,618 447,000 S 83,664 1,107,100 1,127,641 52,433 77,462 329,161 471,000 -75,500 79,798 314,748 356,000 76,303 31,419 550,061 535,593 345,002 338,376 480,500 516,326 221,000 221,148 396,200 388,230 239,700 239,829 993,000 752,344 _ -11,262 21,169 -1,054 -2,535 277,163 440,000 390,923 188,000 187,555 331,158 56,506 509,000 375,000 250,000 3,999,798 495,000 403,840 223,394 3,182,053 S- - 605,000 - - 541,874 -40-9- 533,235 533,235 26,383,707 25,999,753 638,080 638,080 435,738 433,994 395,500 394,546 356,000 76,303 548,790 580,209 8,564,282 8,517,707 1,700 1,700 3,512,350 3,512,350 4,956,113 4,649,606 67,974 67,974 3,679,683 331,158 56,506 5,769,490 4,906,722 605,000 541,874 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 10. Mountain Point Breakwater, AK (Contrib. Funds) 11. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 12. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 13. Old Harbor, AK 14. Port Lions, AK (Contrib. Funds) 16. St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 17. St. Paul Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp., Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,077,470 - 2,555 69,000 635,000 54,883 637,339 - -125,000 135,330 161,063 159,540 330,628 158,884 72,900 100,642 99,100 275,678 5,000 5,000 207,300 159,601 271,300 241,890 140,000 191,922 430,535 330,879 2,500 2,500 S 314,157 61,632 174,689 531,360 2,366,172 2,283,937 18,141,200 18,304,806 174,689 76,155 97,275 203,000 143,493 3,004,000 2,823,998 2,564 -40-10- 5,077,470 5,075,374 148,520 148,520 830,644 724,651 704,000 692,222 -125,000 135,330 428,720 428,720 4,487,039 4,485,766 1,348,240 1,348,240 9,920,080 9,884,069 175,000 175,000 132,946 370,415 194,578 1,825,311 1,825,311 150,844 271,964 4,203,000 4,066,893 19,635,200 19,593,562 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT -40-11- See Section Total to In Text Poject Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 30 Sep 93 18. Wrangell Harbor, AK New Work Approp. 537,020 Cost 537,020 Maint. Approp. 44,888 340,000 297,000 1,179,240 Cost 61,039 30,683 334,021 41,248 6,314,472 19. Bethel Bank New Work Stabilization, AK Approp. 424,854 499,548 2,081,854 Cost 76 125 312,456 447,127 1,920,684 20. Chena River Lakes, New Work AK Approp. 114,000 8,163 -100,000 25,000 214,038,928 Cost 474,789 358,671 -129,571 52,158 214,026,204 Maint. Approp. 994,754 1,312,200 1,657,800 1,638,000 4,608,000 Cost 947,827 1,182,576 1,582,178 1,319,205 4,083,959 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. - 2,182,300 Cost - - 2,145,929 21. Homer Spit Erosion, New Work AK Approp. 110,000 46,000 110,000 2,030,000 3,100,000 Cost 74,267 90,000 110,423 131,176 1,209,759 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. 30,000 Cost 7,251 24 7 7,282 24. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. 2,986,000 -800,000 4,787,000 -25,000 143,184,550 Cost 2,457,450 2,063,559 5,571,354 520,309 143,035,978 27. Sitka Harbor, AK New Work Approp, 50,000 395,144 445,144 Cost 48,751 326,529 375,280 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Jul. 14, 1960 Apr. 20, 1933 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1964 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 Jul. 14, 1960 -40-12- ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BETHEL HARBOR, AK Basin of 6 acres dredged to 4 feet below mean lower low water, maneuvering and turning basin, and access channel. Floating docks constructed by local in 1989. CORDOVA HARBOR, AK Two breakwaters, 1,000 and 1,400 feet in length protecting an 18.67 acre area dredged to a depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water. Harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of 1,400-foot breakwater and construction of a new 2,000-footlong breakwater. The entrance channel dredged to 16 feet below mean lower low water and turning basin dredged from 10 to 12 feet below mean lower low water. CRAIG HARBOR, AK Dredging of a small-boat mooring basin approximately 157,500 sq. feet to a depth of 11 feet below mean lower low water; and entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. HUMBOLYDT HARBOR, AK Dredging of protected area of 16.6 acres and an entrance channel 120 feet wide to a depth of 18 feet below mean lower low water. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Breakwater 1,900 feet long with an entrance channel 930 feet long and 20 feet deep to serve 45 acres of moorage in St. Herman's Bay. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L 94-587 Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, P.L 86-645 H.R 7634, 86th Cong. Doc. 33, Committee on Rivers and Harbors, House of Representatives 73rd Cong. Sec. 55, P.L. 88-451, Senate Doc. 2881, 88th Cong. Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, P.L. 86-645 H.R 7634,86th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945, Doc. #558, 76th Cong. 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 Section 201(a), P.L 89-298 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 202, P.L 99-662 S.Doc. 6, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 102, Water Resource Development Act of 1990, PL 101-640, 101st Cong. H.Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 7. 8. 9. Oct. 25, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 ALASKA DISTRICT Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Dcuments 10. Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 3, 1958 11. -40-13- MOUNTAIN POINT BREAKWATER, AK Construction of 424 feet of rubblemound breakwater. A 50- foot timber float is being provided by the local sponsors. Water depths range from 8 feet above mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410 foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long. Seawall OLD HARBOR, AK Dredging of small boat basin 200 feet by 700 feet and an entrance channel 60 feet by 600 feet to a depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of a 600-foot breakwater and a 170-foot stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of 3 feet above mean lower low water to 18 feet below mean lower low water and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 below feet mean lower low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of 18 above mean lower low water. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet of riverbank. CHENA RIVER IAKES, AK Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River.4 HOMER SPIT, AK Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an existing sheetpile wall to provide protection and nourishment along a 1000 foot portion of State highway. Section 202, P.L 99-662 S.Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 Sec. 101, Water Resource Development Act of 1990, P.L 101-640, 101st Cong. Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, H.R 7634, 86th Cong. H.Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H.Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, H.R 7634, 86th Cong. Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineer, April 9, 1979 Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Section 202, P.L. 99-662 H.Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 12. 13. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 16, 1948 Jun. 15, 1966 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 14. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 28, 1990 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Pmject and Work Authorized Documents 24. SNETTISHAM, AK Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission H.Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.2 facilities. 27. SITKA HARBOR, AK Oct. 31, 1992 Boat harbor consisting of 3 rubblemound breakwaters. Water Resource Development Act of 1992, H.Doc. 103-37, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess. ' - 7 7 74 7 7 7 77 : "- 7 7 7 1"-- 1. Purchase ot dredge and deepwater jetties deautnorzed November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 0. Extension oi jetties classifea imactive. 4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. -40-14- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-C (OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 1. Abandonment recommended in H.Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK' Completed 1920 128,896 2,154 Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK' Cordova, AK Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK2 Homer Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kake Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Mekorykuk, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Port Lions, AK2 Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Stikine River, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1983 1985 1977 1978 1986 1983 1963 1983 1972 1959 1964 1977 1987 1983 1977 1941 1974 1991 1975 1979 1973 1986 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1986 1960 1916 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1987 1968 1979 7. In addition, ,8'7,000( of state funds. 8. Inclqde $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Incl4des $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 2,000,0001. 1,520,272 1,220,000 843,534 9,642,000 1,033,500 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,00(0 2,000,000 4,255,00( 3,679,6837 66,037 1,381,150 870,700 109,848 1,602,417 1,891,2128 1,372,139 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 1,825,311 337,668 377,062 1,051,8839 1,798,010 712,36910 1,611,009 133,180 649,74011 3,562,343 -40-15- 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,400 32,665 8,804 221,498 309,260 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 TABLE 40-E TER AUTHORIZED FLWOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project . Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0062 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK3 Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK4 Completed 1945 416,3826 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,770 7 162,925" Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. During FY88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Allison Lake, AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 1970 1991 9,700 Scammon Bay, AK 1992 Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26,385 -40-16- ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTIIORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Anchor Point, AK Atka, AK Akutan, AK Barrow, AK. Chignik, AK Cordova, AK Craig, AK Hydaburg, AK Ketchikan, AK King Cove, AK Klawock, AK Koyuk, AK Larsen Bay, AK Little Diomede, AK Mountain Point, AK Nome, AK Port Lions, AK St. Mary's, AK Seward Expansion, AK Wainwright, AK Whittier, AK Williamsport, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK TOTAL Fiscal Year Costs $45,029 13,125 11,000 10,000 2,000 8,500 38,472 4,500 54,268 11,992 6,755 10,000 46,957 27,815 54,883 6,278 185,337 10,426 6,758 9,000 36,647 37,956 219 637,917 TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Date Survey Conducted St. George Harbor January 1993 Aurora Harbor, Juneau, AK April 1993 Harris Harbor April 1993 Haines Harbor April 1993 Douglas Harbor April 1993 Wrangell Narrows Channel (Mi. 0.0 to 4.7) May 1993 Petersburg Harbor May 1993 Iliuliuk Channel August 1993 -40-17- -- .e MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: BG Eugene S. Witherspoon, President Designee, Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Frank H. Walk, appointed Oct. 22, 1987; BG Albert J. Genetti, Jr., appointed Oct. 9, 1992, Commander, Ohio River Division; RADM J. Austin Yeager, Member Designee, NOAA; COL Gerald E. Galloway, U.S. Army, appointed Oct. 28, 1989; COL Walter S. Tulloch, served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of five salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, four in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi - Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds- Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo- Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and HamburgBay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N. page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets.insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $11,374,057,000 (cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1993, of $5,560,629,093, the entire project is about 83 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1993, was $5,624,897,857. (See Table 42-V.) (See also Tables 42-U, 42-W, and 42-X for additional financial statements. Operations and results during fiscal year. The 342nd Session was held Apr. 26-30, 1993, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at New Madrid, MO; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and New Orleans, LA; with approximately 250 people in attendance. This 342nd session adjourned at New Orleans, LA, at 10:25 a.m. on Apr. 30, 1993. The 343rd Session was held Sep. 20-24, 1993, onboard the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, MO, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed. The members visited Lake Chicot Pumping Plant area near Lake Village, AR, and toured by helicopter and boat the Terrebonne Parish, LA, area, which is being studied for inclusion in the Mississippi River and Tributaries project. Public meetings were held at Cape Girardeau, MO; Memphis, TN; Rosedale, MS; and Morgan City, LA; with approximately 205 people in attendance. This 343rd Session adjourned at 10:50 a.m. at Morgan City, LA, on Sep. 24, 1993. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1992 (59th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed during FY 1992. Approximately 5,339 flight-line mniles of black-andwhite aerial photography (various scales); 695 flightline miles of color photography; and about 749 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District: The revision of 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Baton Rouge, LA; New Orleans, LA; Thibodeaux, LA; and Zachary, LA, were completed and printed in 1993. Memphis District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of Bayourville, MO; Caruthersville, MO; Charleston, MO; Wickliffe,' MO & KY; are completed. 1:250,000 scale completed of Blytheville, AR; Dyersburg, TN; Memphis, TN; Paducah, KY; Poplar Bluff, AR; Rolla, MO; Russellville, AR. Vicksburg District-Series Conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 - scale quadrangles to 1:62,500 - scale quadrangles of Crosby, MS; Gloster, MS; Union Church, MS; Bude, MS; Canton, MS; Sharon, MS; Carthage, MS; Thomastown, MS; Edinburg, MS; Liberty, MS; Hodge, LA; Jonesboro, LA; Goldonna, LA; and Franklinton, LA are in progress. Woodville, MS; Morton, MS; Forest, MS; Pelahatchie, MS; Fayette, 41-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 MS; Yazoo City, MS; Flora, MS; Poplarville, MS; Bernice, LA; Ruston, LA; Sarepta, LA; and England, AR, were published. Jamestown, LA; Bienville, LA; Many, LA; LeCompte, LA; Alexandria, LA; and Boyce, LA; are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 48.6 feet at Cairo gage on Apr. 10, 1993, and maximum discharge of 1,150,000 cubic feet per second occurred at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 32.1 feet at Memphis on Apr. 13-15, 1993, with maximum discharge of 1,240,000 cubic feet per second on Apr. 13-15, 1993. Vicksburg District-No significant flooding in the Vicksburg District during FY 93. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg Districts reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 37.4 feet on May 16, 1993, and maximum discharge of 1,328,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 43.6 feet on May 18, 1993, and maximum discharge of 1,313,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 53.45 feet NGVD onMay 21, 1993, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 15.0 feet NGVD on May 2, 21, 22, 1993. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 35.8 feet NGVD on May 18, 1993. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill of 1990 directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. It also directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features of the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-and-effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 29.8 miles of levees and surfaced 4.0 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Enlarged 2.6 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Initiated construction on 5.2 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42- N.) There are 1,608.7 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.9 are in place with 1,268.8 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.5 miles, of which 2,195.7 are in place with 1,762.5 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are 85.4 miles of levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River miles (all completed); 59.2 along the south bank of Red River (all completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 miles in place and 349.1 miles completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 682.1 miles of berms, 527.3 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 2,091.0 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,132.4 miles, are in place with 998.3 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 15.3 miles and 865.5 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For summary of levee work Table 42-N. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G.) Work included dredging 9,457,600 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: Vicks- 41-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION burg District, channel maintenance was performed by government-owned dredge Jadwin. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredges Burgess, Hurley and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean (name changed to Wallace McGeorge). The MR&T Harbor maintained in New Orleans District was Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), by T. L. James cutterhead dredge Armadillo, II. The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredge Natchez., Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 18.56 miles of new bank revetment and 166,970 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 4.46 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance was performed. Approximately 1.5 miles of new bank revetment was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles., However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 991.67 miles of operative bank revetment and 260.39 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low- water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 128.5 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 71.7 miles of revetment and 5.2 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls continued on the east and west protection levees. There was one levee enlargement and floodwall contracts completed along the east protection levee over a distance of 3.3 miles with a placement of 21,000 cubic yards during the period. Another contract was completed in the area west of Berwick, LA, to enlarge 3.4 miles of levee with a placement of 120,000 cubic yards during the period. There are three contracts for 9.8 miles of levee enlargement, floodwalls, and slide repairs, under construction on the west protection levee with 5,300 cubic yards of placement during the period. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, condition and operation studies, and water control management activities were continued. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 3,630,000 cubic yards by three leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay harbor at a total cost of $3,608,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 90 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,670,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 349.1 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works below Morgan City, modification of existing structures and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 40.2 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. 41-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1993, at a cost of $108,000. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therefore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as "inactive." If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. A new office building was completed in FY 1990 at a cost of $245,500. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket boat was previously used at the inflow channels to the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was removed from operation in FY 1988. Maintenance by contract: Maintenance dredging was not performed in FY 1993 at the Old River Lock Forebay where approximately 121,000 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $120,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little 41-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. The engineering studies included preparation of a report on incorporation of the Bayou Rapides drainage structure and pumping plant into the project. This report was approved by HQUSACE in Jun. 93. Work was initiated on a Project Management Plan to address rehabilitation of the drainage structure and pumping plant. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 29 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. The Bayou Rapides drainage structure and pumping plant are in need of repair, and studies were initiated to address this need. TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. The riverside gate repair contract the contract for the bulkhead gate repairs are complete, and the contract for pump repairs. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. This project has been placed in the "inactive" category. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (b) Red River backwater area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features are complete. Planning and design has been deferred on the two remaining mitigation features. Tensas- Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 was awarded in January 1991 and is physically complete. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 miles. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been reclassified as inactive. A contract for Sicily Island Item 5-B, is physically complete and the contract for Sicily Island Item 5A-R is substantially complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. Levee Items 4-A and 4-B have been completed. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 15.8 miles of which have been completed. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Big Sunflower River, etc. Weir B on the National Wildlife Refuge was awarded in April 1993, and it is nearing completion. Work continued throughout FY 93 on Steele Bayou, Item 66-B, Levee and channel, and it is 94 percent complete. The contract for selective clearing and snagging on Black Bayou, Item 1-A, is nearing completion and the contract for 9 riser pipes on that reach was completed in FY 93. Steele Bayou Item 66-A, Levee and Channel, is scheduled for award in the spring of 1994. The Final Reformulation Report on the Upper Steele Bayou was approved in May 93, and first construction contract, Main Canal, Item 1, is scheduled for award in the summer of 1994. (b) Flood Control Reservoirs (1) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 229.3 feet NGVD on Dec. 15, 1991, and storage in flood control pool was 279,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 26,300 cubic feet per second on Dec. 3, 1991. On Sep. 30, 1992, the pool elevation 41-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 was 217.3 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 91,500 acre-feet. (2) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 252.3 feet NGVD on Aug. 14, 1993, when storage in the flood control pool was 308,900 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 10,950 cubic feet per second on Apr. 10, 1993. On Sep. 30, 1993, pool elevation was 243.3 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 176,100 acre-feet. (3) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non- Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 215.3 feet NGVD on Aug. 14, 1993, when storage in the flood control pool was 560,200 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 18,050 cubic feet per second on Apr. 10, 1993. On Sep. 30, 1993, the pool elevation was 208.4 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 345,600 acre-feet. (4) Sardis Lake (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 261.9 feet NGVD on Aug. 15, 1993, when storage in the flood control pool was 676,100 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 10,350 cubic feet per second on Apr. 11, 1993. On Sep. 30, 1993 the pool elevation was 255.3 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 470,600 acre-feet. A construction contract was awarded for the seismic remediation of Sardis Dam utilizing driven pre-stressed concrete piling as a result of an extensive study and evaluation of the expected performance of the dam during a major earthquake in the New Madrid earthquake zone of the central United States. (c) Greenwood, Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (d) Main stem. Remaining unconstructed features are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (e) Mississippi Delta, MS. Feasibility studies limited solely to flood control problems in the Big Sunflower River Basin, have been initiated at full Federal cost. These investigations are scheduled for completion in FY 97. (f) Reformulation Study. The uncompleted portions of the Yazoo Basin construction program are being reformulated. This reformulation study includes investigations of the engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the basin and is being accomplished in 4 phases. These studies will evaluate reasonable arrays of alternatives to the project features that remained after construction of items budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90. The reformulation study for the Upper Yazoo Project will be finalized and submitted for approval in December 1993. The Upper Steele Bayou report was approved on May 25, 1993. Concerning the final 2 phases, the Yazoo Backwater Reformulation Study began in FY 93 and the Tributaries study will begin in FY 94. (g) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek, Item lA; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 15 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. During FY 93, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. The District completed the construction of 67 low drop grade control structures, 415,456 linear feet of bank stabilization, 62,265 linear feet of channel improvement, 4 box culverts, 5 high drop grade control structures, 3 riprap sills, and 345 riser pipe grade control structures. (h) Tributaries. Construction: (1) (1) Bank Stabilization. Three bank stabilization items located on the Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers were approved for addition to the FY 93 program. Construction contracts are scheduled for FY 94 award. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was com- 41-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION pleted Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (3) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Three Pelucia Creek pumping stations were completed in FY 93. Construction contracts are underway and scheduled for FY 94 completion on Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4. Pelucia Creek relocations are scheduled for completion in FY 97. (i) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, and four drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was completed on Apr. 29, 1991. Contracts scheduled for award after FY 90 are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. (1) A contract for bank stabilization on Upper Yazoo Projects, Item 2-B-R, was completed. (2) Construction contracts for Levee Item 3A-2, Fort Loring Water Control Structure and Tchula Lake Weirs are underway. Roebuck Lake Water Control Structure is scheduled for completion in FY 94. (3) Design efforts for channel Items 3 and 4 are underway. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Items lA and 1B have been completed. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations have been constructed to mitigate for the waterfowl impacts of the project. Mitigation of the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land is now being reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature ofYazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 65 percent complete. A total of 50.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. Memphis District CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Nonconnah Erosion Protection awarded, Oct. 26, 1990, completed Apr. 20, 1993. Nonconnah Erosion Protection I-B, awarded, Jun. 25, 1992, 90 percent completed. Ensley Hazardous waste storage awarded May 14, 1993, completed Oct. 1, 1993. Horn Lake Creek, Desoto, MS, awarded Apr. 16, 1993, completed Aug. 31, 1993. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. Remaining work consists of tree growth on Item 1. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1989 and Item 3-2, awarded Sep. 10, 1992, is 90 percent complete. HORN LAKE CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES INCLUDING COW PEN CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI Location. Horn Lake Creek is located in northwest Desoto County, MS and southwest Shelby County, TN. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Nov. 17, 1986, under authority of Title IV, Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of 3.5 miles of drift removal and 2.75 miles of channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek; 2.1 miles of channel clearing on Rocky Creek and 0.62 miles of channel clearing and 1.85 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. The project will provide 1.1-year flood frequency protection on Horn Lake and Rocky Creeks and 25-year flood frequency protection on Cow Pen Creek. The estimated construction cost for the project is $4,700,000. The initial contract for project construction was awarded in Apr. 1993. 41-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Horn Lake Creek Watershed Drainage District on Feb. 26, 1992. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-ofway and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution. Total non-Federal cost share will be between 25 and 50 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. The initial construction contract for drift removal and channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek was completed in Aug. 1993 The contracts for work on Rocky and Cow Pen Creeks will be awarded once the Horn Lake Drainage District completes acquisition of rights-of-way. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Operations and results during fiscal year. Item 1-A, bridge protection, awarded Oct. 26, 1990, completed Feb. 28, 1993. Item 1-B, bridge protection awarded Jun. 24, 1993, completed Feb. 28, 1993. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1990 and is 39 percent complete. MEMPHIS HARBOR, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. Item No. 6-717.5, Ensley, TN Berm, awarded Jun. 27, 1990, completed Jul. 9, 1993. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. StaMtioodnisf icPautimonpss , toC a1i0roth, IaLn,d a2w8atrhd eSdt reJeutls 2P8u, m1p9i8n9g, completed Jan. 27, 1992. Item R-735 West Memphis, AR, Landside Berm and Drainage Improvements, West Memphis,AR, awarded May 28, 1991, completed Oct. 9, 1992. In addition minor maintenance on levees is performed as required by the local interests and major maintenance is performed as required for slide repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Roadway Resurfacing. Huffman, AR, Berm was awarded Sep. 24, 1993. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO (a) Little River Drainage. Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed this Fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 90 percent complete. (b) Lower St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Long Lake Culvert Repair awarded Sep. 24, 1993. Blackdale Mangrum Gravel awarded Sep. 29, 1993. Mark Tree, AR Siphon Rehabilitation awarded Sep. 27, 1993. Below Rivervale Levee Restoration awarded Sep. 27, 1993, 25 percent complete. Mark Tree Levee Slope Restoration awarded Jun. 24, 1993. Schug Levee Graveled awarded Jun. 29, 1993. Ditch 1, Item 3 Bridge 22.05 awarded Oct. 30, 1992, completed Sep. 10, 1993. Payneway Gravel awarded Oct. 9, 1992, completed Apr. 2, 1993. Ditch 1, Item 1, channel, awarded Jul. 31, 1992, completed Nov. 17, 1992. Ditch 1, Item 2, bridges, miles 14.32 and 15.00, awarded Jun. 13, 1989, 99 percent complete. Ditch 1, Item 3, bridges, miles 22.80 and 27.63, awarded Oct. 23, 1990, 99 percent complete. Ditch 1, Item 3, bridges, miles 20.50 and 21.60, awarded May 29, 1992, completed Jul. 29, 1993. Ditch 7, bridge, mile 6.05, awarded May 21, 1992. Ditch 1, Item 3, bridge, mile 25.25, awarded Apr. 27, 1993, completed Oct. 15, 1993. Ditch 7, channel and culverts, awarded Sep. 22, 1993. Ditch 1, Item 2, channel, awarded Jul. 15, 1993, 33 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. Project is 98 percent complete. (c) St. Francis River and Tributaries Operations and results during fiscal year. Ditch 9 Channel Enlargement awarded Jun. 28, 1991, completed, Dec. 23, 1992. 10th/28 pump repairs awarded Jul. 20, 1989, 95 percent complete. Brown's Ferry Gravel awarded Jan. 28, 1992, completed Dec. 18, 1992. Nash/Advance Levee Surf. awarded May 29, 1992, completed Oct. 9, 1992. Wyatt Resurfacing awarded Jun. 25, 1992, completed Apr. 27, 1993. 41-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1937 and is 86 percent complete. (d) Upper St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Main-New Franklin, bridge, mile 2.35, awarded Sep. 30, 1992, completed Jul. 16, 1993. Main-new Franklin, channel, road, and fish pool weir, awarded Jul. 2, 1992, completed Sep. 29, 1993. Main-New Franklin, bridge, mile 3.64, awarded Sep. 29, 1989, 99 percent completed. Bypass Steele, bridge, mile 2.49, awarded May 1, 1991, 45 percent complete. Bypass Steele, bridge, mile 3.10, awarded May 1, 1991, 34 percent complete. New Franklin, bridge, mile 6.00, awarded Jul. 30, 1992, 4 percent complete. New Franklin, bridge, mile 6.94, awarded May 27, 1993, 46 percent complete. New Franklin, bridge, mile 9.60, awarded Jul. 30, 1992,4 percent complete. New Franklin, bridges, miles 0.68 and 1.72, awarded May 25, 1993, 22 percent complete. Ditch 9, channel, awarded Jun. 28, 1991, completed Dec. 15, 1992. Alteration Highway E. Bridge, awarded Sep. 28, 1989, completed Oct. 28, 1993. Lake County Levee Surfacing awarded Sep. 30, 1989, completed Dec. 4, 1992. Ditch I-1 Excan., awarded Jul. 31, 1992, completed Nov. 17, 1992. Mud Lake Floodgate awarded, Jun. 30, 1992, 90 percent complete. Castor/River I-2 awarded, Jun. 25, 1992, completed Oct. 14, 1992. DD17 Trash Barrier awarded Jun. 30, 1992, completed Nov. 19, 1992. Mat Casting at Richardson awarded, Oct. 8, 1991, completed Nov. 20, 1992. Culvert Replacement Blue Bayou, awarded Sep. 30, 1992, 90 percent complete. Big Slough Ditch, Item 4M-Channel Clearing awarded Oct. 26, 1992, completed Jun. 24, 1993. Locust Creek Channel Clearing awarded Dec. 11, 1992, completed May 6, 1993. Mud Lake Culvert, Gate Hoist Renovation awarded Mar. 31, 1993, completed Dec. 1993. Ditch 1, Item 3 Bridge 25.25, awarded Apr. 27, 1993, completed Oct. 15, 1993. Elk Chute Gravel Surfacing awarded May 7, 1993, completed Aug. 13, 1993. Ditch 1, Channel Enlargement, Item 2 awarded Jul. 15, 1993, 65 percent complete. Ditch 7, Channel Clearing awarded Sep. 22, 1993. Repair Cache River Culvert awarded Sep. 22, 1993. Levee Seepage Control, Huffman, AR awarded Sep. 23, 1993. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. project is 98 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. Project is currently inactive due to lack of local support. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 13 percent complete. (b) Item 2, Bridge Protection. Awarded Apr. 8, 1993, 15 percent complete. (c) Item 3, Bridge Protection. Awarded May 6, 1993, completed Sep. 30, 1993. (d) Obion River and principal tributaries, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 66 percent complete. (e) Sharon, TN, I-1A Gas Pipeline. Mile 7.4 awarded Aug. 18, 1992, completed Jan. 15, 1993. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 41 percent complete. WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the city ofJonesboro, AR. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, on Oct. 31, 1992. The project consists of 6.1 miles of channel improvements on Whiteman's, Turtle, Moore's and Higginbottom Creeks. The proposed improvements will provide 10-year level of flood protection along Whiteman's, Turtle and Moores and 25-year protection on Higginbottom. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is expected to be executed in early FY 1994. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) is being completed. 41-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-957' Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL 10-81 11-25 38 45 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 LA 127-129 Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA 129 Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA/MS (Bonnet Carre') 129-234 Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, LA 235 Baton Rouge Harbor 279-287 Morganza Floodway, LA 287-303 Morganza-Old River, LA The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caernarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank 41-12 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Public Law 100-676 Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 303-314 Old River, LA control 314-572 Old RivereCypress Creek, AR 437 Vicksburg Harbor, MS 437-721 Vicksburg-Lake View, MS 490 Wilson Point, LA 537 Greenville Harbor, MS 646 Long Lake, Helena, AR 605-666 Henrico-Helena, AR 672-993 St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 722-725 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) 721-734 Memphis Harbor, TN 803-873 Tiptonville-Obion River 857 Near Mud Lake, TN 890 St. Johns Bayou, MO 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY 922 Hickman, KY 946 Peafield, MO 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. 41-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping -- district, Mounds, Mound plant City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 41-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA' Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel' Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 41-15 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTMVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. -- -- Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement Washington to west protection levee. 41-16 Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. 0-17 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Bayou Rapides Pumping plant and gravity structure Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement, Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) Added to project by Public Law 101-514. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) 41-17 (2,3) 82-145 3-56 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality- Improvement Remarks Sicily Island area 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA Boeuf River, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank 41-18 (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526. 2.3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 23-98 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant. Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 41-19 Floodway channel REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. 41-20 Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 0-47 Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Obion Creek, KY LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Levees Levees Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 41-21 Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 0-28 0-120 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY. OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Floodwall, levee, revetment, and Mounds, IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.' See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 41-22 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name1 Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Nearest town to damsite Drainage area, square miles Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Elevation, feet, NGVD Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Outlet gates: Number Size, feet Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Length, feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Elevation, feet, NGVD Dam: Type, earthfill Length, thousand feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Yalobusha Grenada 1,320 10 86 193.0 65 1.252 17.8 3 7.5 by 14 10.7 Chute 200 231.0 52 106 1,385 19.7 247.5 Rolled 13.9 256.0 Yocona Enid 560 6 58 230.0 28 602 20.2 Little Tallahatchie Sardis 1,545 11 108 236.0 58.5 1,462 17.7 2 4 8 by 16 6 by 12 9.4 Chute 200 268.0 50 41 554 18.5 284.0 Rolled 8.4 293.0 10.0 Chute 400 281.4 132 90 1,447 17.6 301.0 Hydraulic 15.3 311.4 41-23 Coldwater Arkabutla 1,000 5 31 209.3 33 494 9.3 3 8.5 by 19 10.0 Chute 300 238.3 89 63 858 16.1 256.3 Rolled 11.5 264.3 St. Francis Wappapello 1,310 4 31 354.7 23 582 8.4 3 10 by 20 18.0 Gravity 740 394.7 229 32 521 7.5 413.7 Rolled 2.7 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 41-24 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS.' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR.' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).' Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA.' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR. Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA.' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. 41-25 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.1 Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 41-26 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. 41-27 Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 1970' Apr. 29, 1970' Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively.4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. 41-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. 41-29 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING '.LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 41-30 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 41-31 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct Unpublished New Orleans salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than District report, at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Nov. 1, 1984. Water Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of Public Law 100-676 Resources Construction: Nov. 17, 1988 Development a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. Act, 1988 Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. 41-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Section 4(b) Public Law 100-676, Resources West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project Nov. 17, 1988 Development by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be Act, 1988 provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or any unit of a state, county, or local government. Energy and West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Public Law 101-83, Water Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective Jul. 25, 1989 Development flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without Appropriation regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the Bill, 1990 amount of runoff. Energy and Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant Public Law 101-514, Water Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate Nov. 5, 1990 Development existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides Appropriation Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red Bill, 1990 River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Water Resource Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. Public Law 102-580 Development Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control Oct. 31, 1992 Act, 1992 improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 41-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act of Incorporation Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Public Law No. 79-526 79-526 79-526 79-526 79-526 79-526 80-858 81-516 81-516 Authorizing Act Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 22, 1936 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Description Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements, TN Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA Big Sunflower River, etc. Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) Jonesville, LA Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1941, p. 943 1946, p. 1029 1946, p. 1053 1946, p. 1083 1945, p. 982 1946, p. 1061 1948, p. 1059 1953, p. 773 1953, p. 737 41-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1993 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance), MS St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS Greenville Harbor, MS Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm), TN Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA $ 239,238,000 1,366,000,000 5,270,000' 4,000,000 3,570,000,000 1,670,000,000 152,000,000 20,400,000' 292,273,000 23,500,0003 50,000,0003 83,800,000 517,000,000 29,676,000' 130,900,0001 1,967,894,000 16,802,000' 49,800,0003 152,000,000 381,000,000 9,200,0003 13,550,000' 126,000,000 14,300,000' (11,000,000)3 440,000 10,560,0008 24,800,000' 29,200,000 46,600,0004 18,400,0004 2,350,0004 32,400,0003,4 23,100,0004 30,600,0004 7,700,00014 11,600,00046 63,500,0004 18,800,0004'7 41-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTMVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-F (Continued) SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1993 Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA and MS 57,700,00038 Whiteman's Creek, AR 3,340,000 Eastern Arkansas, AR 114,0003 Jackson and Trenton, AR 9,650,0003 Mississippi Delta, MS 61,600,0003 Bushley Bayou, LA 37,000,000 TOTAL $11,374,057,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). 4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 5. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. 6. Locals are building their own project. 7. Price Level as of 1988. 8. Error last year. 41-36 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 1993 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- 142.1 142.1 Main stem channel 234-320 -- 0 0 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 640.4 640.4 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 0 0 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 0 0 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 8,174.5 8,174.5 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 500.6 500.6 TOTAL -- 9,457.6 9,457.6 41-37 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .............. Olga, LA ................ Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ........ Neptune, LA ........... Buras, LA .............. Tropical Bend, LA ........ Bayou Lamoque, LA ...... Port Sulphur, LA ......... Point Michel, LA ......... Bohemia, LA ............ Diamond, LA ............ Gravolet, LA ............ Junior, LA .............. Harlem, LA ............. Myrtle Grove, LA ........ Monsecour, LA .......... Alliance, LA ............ Belair, LA ............... Jesuit Bend, LA .......... Linwood, LA ............ Oak Point, LA ........... Scarsdale, LA ........... English Turn, LA ....... Poydras, LA ............. Twelve Mile Point, LA ... Cutoff, LA .............. Third district reach, LA .... Algiers Point, LA ......... Gouldsboro Bend, LA ...... Gretna Bend, LA ......... Greenville Bend, LA ...... Carrollton Bend, LA ...... Avondale Bend, LA ....... 12 19 22 23 25 30 33 39 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 84 88 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 R L R L R R L R R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R R L R R R R L R -- 40,126 -- 13,885 14,399 1,968 1,978 1,247 -- -- -- 280 105 --45 -- --5 69,601 12,650 -- -_ 14,685 10,761 2,558 2,051 1--515 -- --51 17,397 9,966 9--434 -- -- --_ -- -- 5,792 8,323 6,172 4,990 3,350 10,615 15,430 14,399 17,283 25,012 21,505 36,995 22,932 15,441 11,600 23,874 23,599 15,148 17,435 11,571 17,265 26,111 24,978 12,005 12,377 16,570 19,718 45,864 9,979 23,234 27,167 12,238 4,960 9,662 22,045 16,262 -- 28,409 Co 0 H :4 0 O Ol HD TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Kenner, LA........... Luling, LA............. Destrehan, LA........... Good Hope, LA.......... Waterford, LA ........... Montz, LA .............. Lucy, LA ............. .. Reserve, LA . ....... Willow Bend, LA...... Angelina, LA........... Vacherie, LA ............ Belmont, LA ............ Rich Bend, LA ........... Romeville, LA........... St. Alice, LA ........... Burnside, LA............ Aben, LA-.............. St. Elmo, LA............ Smoke Bend, LA. ........ Marchand, LA ........... Philadelphia Point, LA .... New River Bend, LA ...... White Castle, LA....... St. Gabriel, LA .......... Plaquemine Bend, LA ... Manchac, LA ........... Missouri Bend, LA ........ Arlington, LA ........... Port Allen, LA ........... Scotlandville, LA ......... Allendale, LA ........... Springfield Bend, LA ...... Arboth, LA ....... .. .... Faulkner Lake, LA ....... Grand Bay, LA .......... Bayou Sara, LA......... 114 119 102 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 193 201 209 215 222 227 231 234 238 244 250 253 258 265 L R L L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L 1,624 2,287 -- -- 2,858 1,774 2,939 3,196 5,932 775 90 -10 --40 -- -- -- 170 50 100 1,227 7,930 8,695 -- 11,157 6,229 16,636 14,101 17,581 30,039 555 1,690 -- -- .-- -- -- 3,451 7,133 -- -- 1,739 6,462 11,012 18,422 9,223 3--539 _- -- --53 - I-L 4I boo 0 CI) 41,595 41,948 5,409 24,531 20,386 17,502 19,450 23,234 13,227 31,727 26,025 25,575 38,498 25,966 29,910 29,304 11,700 12,014 18,180 17,583 5,379 45,672 45,968 33,292 42,952 38,976 30,437 16,615 17,627 1,623 28,698 25,690 13,190 17,382 18,234 27,698 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Red Store, LA... ...... Arrow Bend, LA ......... Boies Point, LA .......... Morganza, LA . ......... Iowa Point, LA ......... Brunette Point, LA . ...... Greenwood Bend, LA . ... Hog Point, LA ........... Carr Point, LA......... Above Old River, LA ...... Fort Adams, MS ......... Point Breeze, LA......... Coochie, LA ............ Palmetto, MS ........... Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River .... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............. Hog Point, LA ............ OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ........... Inflow channel ........... Outflow channel ......... 269 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 322 R L R R L R L R R R L R R L 252 L 299 L 315 L 315 R 315 L&R 4,102 3,397 3,605 3 786 3,786 250 460 75 16,742 14,125 12,012 -- 5,391 6,810 2277-0- 22555,55-5-00 18,464 13,600 16,094 20,513 15,477 11,435 25,815 21,424 20,725 8,170 24,206 13,565 17,150 34,650 58,402 3,947 288,494 8,369 47,381 101,840 -- 1,799,564 (11.06 Miles) (1.59 Miles) (340.83 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,315 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,850 11,165 (2.12 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,415 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,365 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,891 0 0 o C.2 O 0 m M C, CC1 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Auxiliary inflow channel ... 312 L&R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,200 Auxiliary outflow channel .. 312 L&R - -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 Total standard revetment, Old River ...... 49,661 (9.41 Miles) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ............ Coville Bayou, LA........ Legonier, LA . ........ Simmesport, LA ......... Kuhlman Bayou, LA...... Odenburg, LA ........... Cason, LA.............. McCrea, LA ............. Woodside, LA........ Provosty, LA ............ Crooked Bayou, LA ....... Mercier, LA ............. Barberton, LA .......... Evans Point, LA.......... Goudeau, LA ............ Morris Bayou, LA ........ Goodwood, LA ........... Red Cross, LA.......... Melville LA ............. Cross Bayou, LA ......... Melville South, LA ....... Toles, LA............... Petite Prairie, LA ....... Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 3 4 6 7 9 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 L R L R L R R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R I CI) C) CI 1,343 6,646 740 720 - - _ --_ 10,541 2--3,437 4,150 6,550 8,940 10,636 5,565 5,375 10,798 6,572 13,002 9,111 16,246 10,478 3,592 4,898 3,938 3,800 8,505 8,065 4,870 3,815 4,070 6,355 8,381 3,128 3,382 2,252 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Holloway Lake, LA ....... 37 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,085 Bayou Sherman, LA ..... 38 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,200 Krotz Springs, LA ........ 40 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 Sherburne, LA ........... ... 43 R - -- -- -- -- - -- 7,035 Bayou Big Graw, LA ...... 46 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,394 Otis Landing, LA ......... . 54 R - -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,251 Morgan City .... ........... 115 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,410 Total standard revetment 7,989 1,460 33,978 -- - 8,762 -- 212,012 (1.51 miles) (40.15 Miles) Dikes: None Below Confluence of Old River LOWER RED RIVER Outflow Channel and Red River Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA........... 10 R -- -- -- -- -- -. -- 6,652 Naples, LA ............. 7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,190 Turnbull Island, LA ....... 9 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,038 Total standard revetment - -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 0 0 tJl t 0 0o C.o tlo ( TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........ Dead Mans Bend, MS ..... Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ... Railroad Landing, MS ..... St. Catherine Bend, LA ... Morville, LA ............ Natchez Island, MS ....... Carthage, MS ........... Vidalia Casting Field ...... Natchez Front, MS ........ Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ...... Gibson, LA ............. Ashland, LA-MS ......... Kempe Bend, LA ......... Browns Field, LA ........ Goldbottom, MS .......... Hardscrabble, LA ........ Grand Gulf, MS .......... Point Pleasant, MS-LA .. Togo Island, LA .......... Lake Karnac, LA-MS ...... Diamond Point, LA-MS . .. Reid-Bedford, LA ......... Racetrack, MS ........... Barge Line Terminal, MS . Vicksburg Harbor, MS ... Delta Point, LA .......... King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ...... False Point, LA .......... Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ............... Milliken Bend, LA ........ Belle Island, LA-MS ...... 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 R L R L R R R L L L R R L R R L R L R R L R R L L L R 4,215 600 6-,6775500 -- 20,909 3,646 29,076 -- -- _ --. -- _ -- _ 2,318 3,727 566 -- -- 439 L 443 R 446 L 453 R 460 L -- 26,055 -- 33,220 -- 24,755 -- 12,835 -- 29,108 -- 14,855 -- 2,180 - 14,700 -- 2,670 -- 6,510 -- 12,020 -- 26,000 -- 29,407 -- 28,285 -- 9,280 -- 30,250 -- 22,530 -- 53,948 -- 32,345 -- 7,080 -- 19,260 -- 14,665 -- 18,392 -- 13,935 -- 3,040 -- 7,350 -- 7,650 -- 19,330 -- 12,860 -- 19,580 -- 46,140 -- 24,160 C-- C1 CI) CI) CI) I TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Oper Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Line Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares' Feet) Feet Goodrich, LA ............ 467 R - -- -- --- 39,20 Cottonwood Bar, MS ..... 470 R - -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,58 Filter-Cottonwood, MS ..... 474 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,42 Hagaman, LA ........... 481 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 37,75 Ben Lomond, MS .......... 486 L - -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,23 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS .......... 488 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 52,12 Lake Providence, LA ..... 489 R -- -- -- - -- -- -- 11,60 Mayersville, MS ......... 497 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,99 Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS .......... 503 R -- -- -- -- -- 7,426 -- 26,81 Carolina, MS ............ 507 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,08 Cracraft, AR ............ 511 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,21 Worthington, MS-AR ...... 514 R -- - -- -- - -- -- 8,3 Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ............... 519 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45,65 American Cutoff, MS-AR ... 526 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,98 Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ... 530 R -- -- -- -- -- 5,511 -- 33,68 Vancluse, AR......... ... 534 R 8,716 -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,01 Island 84, AR-MS ........ 535 L -- -- - -- -- -- -- 13,47 Warfield Point, MS ....... 537 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,32 Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS . 538 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,15 Spanish Moss, AR ........ 539 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,58 Tarpley Island, MS ....... 542 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,0( Miller Bend, MS ......... 544 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,36 Island 82, AR .............. 546 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,0 Ashbrook Island, MS ..... 549 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,45 Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR .............. 553 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 43,01 Huntington Point, MS ..... 556 L -- -- -- -- -- -- - 21,2( Pair O'Dice, AR .......... 561 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,09 Eutaw-Mounds, MS ....... . 563 L -- -- -- - -- -- -- 40,18 Cypress Bend, AR ........ 568 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,57 Catfish Point, MS ........ 573 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,07 Ozark, AR-MS ........... 578 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,01 Prentiss, AR-MS ......... 582 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,31 aar ) '5 010 :7 6 15 42 )0 2 L5 30 L0 50 53 30 35 L6 75 50 30 )0 10 30 55 L5 )5 )5 38 75 75 15 15 0 0 8 0 4 Io-3 03 z 0 *4 0 O O TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Rosedale Bend, AR....... Riverton, MS ............ Klondike, AR........ .. . Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS . Lake Concordia, MS ...... Big Island, AR ........... Smith Point, MS ......... Dennis, MS ............. Cessions, MS ............ Total revetment, Vicksburg District, a Mississippi River.... O1 Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ........ Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS .................. Natchez Island, LA-MS .. Waterproof Bar, LA ....... Spithead Towhead, MS .... Browns Field, LA ........ Cottage Bend, LA-MS ..... Bondurant Towhead, LA . .. Coffee Point, LA . ........ Yucatan, MS.......... Togo Island, LA...... Below Racetrack, MS ...... Racetrack Towhead, MS . . False Point, LA .......... Marshall Cutoff, LA ...... Below Grand Gulf, MS .... Fritz Island, LA .......... 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 L L R L L R L L L -- -- -- -- -- - - 4,820 -- -- -- -- -- - -- 12,500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,400 -- -- -- -- -- -- - 29,245 -- -- -- -- -- - -- 6,980 -- -- -- -- -- - -- 16,515 -- -- - -- -- -- -- 18,185 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,195 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,910 20,281 (3.84 Miles) 53,631 19,548 (3) 330 L 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 441 448 399 338 L R R L R L R R R L L R R R L R 2,073 130 _--. 4I 7-4 -- 1,450,756 (274.76 Miles) -- 4,306 -- 5,351 -- 14,298 -- 14,330 -- 3,661 -- 10,917 -- 14,049 -- 6,029 -- 8,770 -- 9,010 -- 8,256 -- 12,559Z' -- 10,880 -- 5,675 -- 5,166 -- 3,575 -- 4,160 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Forest Home Towhead, LA . Willow Cutoff, LA ........ Arcadia Point, MS ........ Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... Point Lookout, LA........ Ajax Bar, MS............ Ben Lomond, MS....... Baleshed Ldg., MS ........ Wilson Point, LA ......... Corregidor, MS .......... Carolina, AR......... Cracraft Lower, AR ....... Cracraft, AR ............ Leota, MS .............. Island 86, AR ........... Seven Oaks, AR.......... Walnut Point, MS ........ Anconia Chute, AR ....... Refuge, MS ............. Island 84, AR ........... Leland Bar, AR-MS ....... Leland Neck, AR-MS ...... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR .... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS...... Chicot Ldg., AR .......... Catfish Point, MS ........ Below Prentiss, MS ....... Malone Field, AR ......... Terrene, MS ............ White River Landing, AR . Montgomery Towhead, AR.. Victoria Bend, AR ........ 449 462 470 471 478 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 527 528 532 538 540 540 L R L R R L L L R L L R R L R R L R L L R L R 317 -- _ .-- (-1,0 .-- -- -n 331 -- 715 -- . --_ 75 -- 40 -- 35 -- 32) -- -- 11,293 4,275 9,463 2,406 2,751 28,152 24,667 15,091' 8,423 6,730 2,897 10,329 3,809 7,571 17,067 5,829 4,725 4,604 15,165 6,520 15,086f 4,315 10,478 544 R&L 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 13,646 L&R L R L R R L R R R 13,015 8,728 17,451 5,290 7,813 7,549 7,921 2,201 6,071 5,033 0 0 '-3 CI) I tO 0" 0 '- 0 CI) b$.a. 27 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Smith Point, MS ......... Island 70, MS ........... Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 600 L 608 L - -- -- - - - - 7,617 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,435 4,684 (.89 Miles) 486,408 (92.12 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER4 Standard revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........ Como, AR .............. Morgan Bend, AR ........ Yancopin, AR ........... Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ........ Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR . .... Morgan Bend, AR ........ Fletcher Bend, AR ........ Total dikes, Arkansas River ................ RED RIVER' Standard revetment: Dupre, LA .............. Bringol, LA ............. Egg Bend, LA ........... Cologne Bend, LA........ Roxana, LA ............. 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 L R L R R L R C12 C12 Cl) Cl) z - -- - - - - - 11,770 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,540 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 - -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 -- -- -- - -- -- -- 31,540 (5.97 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,848 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,658 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 -- 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 69 73 75 77 83 R R R R R 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Ryland, LA .. . ........... 88 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,925 Whittington, LA ... . .... 89 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- . 2,900 Smith, LA .............. 91 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Latanier, LA ............ 93 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,460 Hudson, LA ............... 99 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,458 Robert, LA.............. 102 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,500 Alexandria Fronit, LA .... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,280 Callahan, LA ............ 110 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,000 Cotton, LA............... . 116 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,700 Rapides, LA .............. 119 R -- -- - -- -- -- -- 1,030 Boyce, LA ............. 125 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,548 Total standard revetment, Red River ............ -- -- -- -- -- - -- 61,566 (11.66 Miles) Dikes6 : Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA .. 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA .... 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,477 Egg Bend, LA .............. 75 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA . ...... . 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ............... 78 R -- -- -- -- -- .. -- 1,900 Richardson, LA .......... 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA .......... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- .- (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA .. .......... 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- .. 7,630 Total dikes, Red River .... -- -- - -- -- - -- 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. Includes all types of dikes and retards. Changed to correct previous error. Removed three vane dikes. 00 1p-3 o3 04 O z 0 0 C-) �i) co TABLE 424J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Oper Construction erative tiv Above New Work Since Thr Head Bank Exten- Prior Thi of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Line Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Fee MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ........... 598 R - - -- -- -- -- -- 3,9 Scrubgrass Bend, AR ...... 600 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,3 Henrico, AR. ... ......... 606 R -- -- -- -- - 2,298 -- 33,3 Cessions Towhead, AR ..... 615 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,4 Island 67, MS ........... 621 L -- - -- -- -- -- -- 9,6 Island 68 Bar-- Knowlton, AR .......... 622 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,7 Ludlow, AR ............. 626 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,3 Rescue Land, AR-MS .... . 629 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,0 Fair Landing, AR ........ 632 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,6 Burke Landing, MS .......... 637 L -- - -- -- -- -- -- 19,0 Island 62, AR . .......... 638 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,0 Island 63, MS ............. 639 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,5 Island 63 Bar, MS ........ ... 639 L -- -- -- - -- -- 3,7 Oldtown Bend, AR ...... . 644 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,8 Horseshoe, MS .......... 647 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,3 Westover, AR ............... 650 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -. 15,6 Delta-Friars Point, MS ... 665 L -- -- -- . -- -- -- 30,0 Helena, AR ............ 660 R -- - -- -- -- 13,825 -- 36,4 Helena Towhead, AR ...... 664 R 3,690 -- 7,997 -- -- -- -- 3,6 Trotters Landing, MS .... 665 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 48,9 Flower Lake, MS .......... . 667 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,3 St. Francis, AR ............. 672 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,6 Harbert Point, MS .......... 675 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,0 Walnut Bend, AR ........ ... 680 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,0 Mhoon Bend, MS. ...... .... . 685 L -- -- -- -- -- 4,582 -- 35,8 Peters, AR o............ 692 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,7 Commerce, MS .......... 695 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,0 Porter Lake, AR ......... 700 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,1 Pickett, MS-AR .......... 703 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,5 Seyppel, AR .............. 709 R 200 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,8 Norfolk-Star, MS .......... 711 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 35,5 Cow Island Bend. AR ..... 714 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 222 au s ar t) 05 15 10 65 30 mm 10 90 20 90 70 30 14 69055 85 40 90 60 90 70 385 63 65 )70 28 60 )85 i55 75 30 82 74 ,aI" TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN ............ Coahoma, TN........... Ensley, TN ............. Dismal Point, AR ......... Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR .... Presidents Island, TN ..... Hopefield Point, AR-TN .... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN ............ ..... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... St. Clair, AR ............. Island 40, TN-AR........ Brandywine, AR-TN ...... Shelby Forest, TN ........ Dean Island, AR ......... Cedar Point-Densford, TN ........ .......... Chute of Island 35, TN .... Lookout Bar, TN ......... Lookout, TN ............ Sunrise Towhead, TN ..... Lower Bullerton, AR ...... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN .......... Osceola, AR ............. Osceola, AR ..... ........ Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ... Kate Aubrey, TN ......... Island 26, TN ........... Bend of Island 25, TN ..... Barfield, AR ............ Obion-Tamm, TN ......... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ............... Heloise, TN ............. 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 R L L R R L R L R R R R L R L R R R R R R R R L R R L R L 1,770 2,510 240 4,125 270 1,968 -- -- _ 2,380 6,997 999 826 R 831 L -- 26,984 -- 12,935 oCr 0 0 H 03 H Ci) 0 H I 0 z 8,623 9,270 44,026 7,200 24,530 12,755 10,360 31,293 2,070 2,930 30,750 18,010 9,550 7,555 20,190 30,400 2,990 5,005 16,995 28,350 30,808 1,350' 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 31,565 52,335 53,831 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Feet) Island 18, MO .......... Linwood Bend, TN ........ Blaker Towhead, TN ...... Bells Point, MO........ Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO.................. Island 15, TN......... Hathaway Landing, TN .... Robinson Bayou, MO . . Fritz Landing, TN ........ Lee Towhead, MO . ..... Bend of Island 14, TN ..... Above Lee Towhead, TN ... Little Cypress, MO ....... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN.................. Linda, MO .............. Below Toney's Towhead, TN.................. Toney's Towhead, KY-TN............... Kentucky Point, KY....... New Madrid Bar, KY .... New Madrid Bend, MO .... La Forge, MO.......... Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY............... Winchester Towhead, MO .................. Island 9, KY-TN ......... Milton Bell, MO ......... Chute of Island 8, KY ..... Bend of Island 8, MO .... Island 8, KY ............ Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ..... Beckwith Bend, MO ...... 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 R L L R R L L R L L L L R 869 L 876 R 879 L 882 887 888 889 892 4,555 7,538 4,407 2,536 5,049 4,548 1,430 16,547 LL R R R 899 L 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 R L R L R R L R 6,5901' -- 24,240 - 14,850 -- 18,562 -- 5,420 - 25,600 -- 3,630 -- 1,000 -- 22,630 -- 15,670 -- 9,640 -- 12,050 -- 4,943 -- 40,140 -- 41,058 - 16,505 -- 20,895 -- 13,640 -- 7,960 -- 16,825 -- 43,262 - 24,930 -- 37,520 -- 5,540 -- 33,585 - 16,600 -- 12,620 -- 24,965 -- 18,515 -- 43,359 -- 14,588 0n Ci) Ci) Ci) Ci) 0 Ci) Ci) z TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Williams, KY......... Wolf Island, KY....... Columbus, KY....... Belmont, MO . ...... Island 3 and 4, KY..... Campbell, KY........... Pritchard, MO ... ........ Mayfield Creek, KY ....... Wickliffe, KY ............ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) .. . . ...... Total revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River...... Dikes: Henrico, AR.......... Below Knowlton, AR ..... Island 67, MS........... Below Ludlow, AR ........ Sunflower, AR......... Island 64, AR . . ........ Island 62, AR ........... Island 63 Bar, MS ........ Island 63, MS .......... Kangaroo Point, AR ....... Friars Point, MS ......... Montezuma Bar, MS ...... Montezuma Towhead, AR . Prairie Point, AR ......... Flower Lake, MS ......... St. Francis Towhead, MS... Below Walnut Bend, AR . .. Bordeaux Point, MS ...... 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 L R L R R L R LL 1,903 958 R 19,315 (3.66 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 R R L R L R R L L 11 L L R R L L R 1,940 35,666 45,582 (6) 1,450 600 5,300 300 500 (5) 681 L 5,300 4,520 -- 10,015 -- 19,205 -- 7,395 -- 5,785 -- 19,970 -- 6,865 -- 15,045 -- 8,935 -- 8,455 -- 26,152 -- 1,985,680 (376.08 Miles) -- 9,080 -- 20,670 -- 4,320 -- 5,040 -- 5,520 -- 7,330 -- 23,180 -- 2,600 -- 5,640 -- 5,730 -- 6,870 -- 15,240 -- 3,450 -- 10,391 -- 11,060 -- 3,380 -- 6,420 -- 11,080 cin 0 H 0 H 00 H 0/ z 0o TABLE 424 BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Oper Construction erative tiv Above New Work Since Thr Head Bank Exten- Prior Thi of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Lin Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares) Feet) Fee Peters, AR ................ 693 R - - - 140 -- -- -- 7,8 Commerce, MS .......... 694 L - -- -- 400 -- -- -- 10,7 Basket Bar, AR . ..... 696 R -- -- - -- -- -- -- 5,5 Buck Island, MS ......... 700 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,7 Porter Lake, AR . .......... 701 R - -- -- -- - -- -- 22,3 Pickett, MS ............. 704 L -- -- - -- -- -- -- 7,1 Seyppel, AR .. ..... ...... 706 R - -- - -- - -- -- 12,2 Cat Island, AR .......... 710 R - -- -- -- -- -- - 15,5 Coahoma, TN ........... 718 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,6 Armstrong, AR-TN ....... 720 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 18,6 Dismal Point, AR ....... ... 724 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 25,5 (Hopefield Point, AR .736 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,3 o1 Memphis Front, TN ........ 736 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,3 cRobinson Crusoe, TN ...... 738 R -- -- -- 600 -- -- -- 21,9 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ... 739 R -- -- - -- -- -- -- 3,9 Above Loosahatchie, TN ... 742 L - -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,9 Redman Point, AR .......... 743 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 7,7 Randolph Point, TN ........ .. 747 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -. 16,7 Poker Point, AR ............ 748 R -- -- - -- -- -- -- 8,6 Corona Bar, TN-AR ....... 755 R -- -- - -- -- - -- 8,4 Densford, TN . ........... 757 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 77 Cedar Point, TN ........... 759 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,8 Below Richardson Landing, TN .............. 767 L -- -- - -- -- -- -- 5,9 Lookout, TN-AR ......... 771 R -- -- -- -- -- -. -- 12, Plum Point, TN .......... 784 L -- -- -- -- -- -. -- 9, Lake Neark, AR ......... 786 R -- - -- -- -. -- -- 2,5 Island 30 ............... 787 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,0 Kate Aubrey, TN ......... 791 R -- -. -- .. - -- - - 11,2 Keyes Point, TN ......... 791 L -- -- -- -- -- ...- 24,6 Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ... 795 R -- -- -- - -- -- -- 17,3 Forked Deer, TN ......... 798 L -- -- - -- -- -- -- 8,5 Island 25, AR ........... 804 R -- -- . 5,4 Nebraska Point, TN ....... . 808 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12, Below Tamm Bend, TN ... 813 L .- -- - -- -- -- -. 8, Wrights Point, AR . .... 820 R -- - - -- -- -. -- 34,7 rae s ar t) 30 45 60 05 15 80 50 90 40 90 10 50 00 39 50 90 50 40 50 30 80 90 50 65 95 45 10 70 90 30 50 50 49 .00 '75 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Island 21, Chute, TN..... Head of Island 21, TN ..... Island 20, MO-TN........ Island 18, TN ........... Tennemo, TN .... . ..... .. Blaker Towhead, TN ...... Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ...... ... . .. Opposite Carthersville, TN . Sandy Hook, TN. ........ Island l5, TN......... Robinson Bayou, MO ... ... Hathaway, TN.. ...... . Island 15 Neck, TN . ...... Above Lee Towhead, TN ... Below Cherokee, TN ...... Stewart Towhead, MO .... Ruddles Point, MO .. ...... Island 11, MO ........... New Madrid Bend, MO .. Kentucky Point, KY ....... Morrison Towhead, MO .... Hotchkiss Bend, MO ...... Slough Landing, KY ...... Below Island 9, TN ....... Donaldson Point, MO .... Island 9, KY ............ Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY . Below Williams, KY ....... Moore Island, KY-MO ..... Above Williams, KY ....... Campbell, KY ........... 824 828 831 837 842 843 844 846 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 874 882 887 887 890 895 896 901 905 906 917 925 929 930 942 L L R L L L R L R L R L L L L R R R R L R R L L R L R L R L L 700 10 4,070 850 7,625 5,065 -- 1,525 2,100 1,770 -- -- 1,600 -- 4,000 2,490 1,000 1,075 250 900 11,025 - --_ --_ --_ 250 900O 1,025 0 H 0 H 0 H O z U) H n, 3,170 5,460 18,139 8,670 8,240 4,080 28,630 3,300 2,350 8,830 10,768 27,355 21,100 1,300 6,230 18,290 8,130 14,330 1,715 12,400 1,070 14,208 5,065 18,859 16,435 7,010 - 14,795 2,160 7,925 1,150 2,610 TABLE 424- (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Pritchard, MO ........... .. 944 R -- -- - - - -- -- 9,390 Island 1, KY ............. 948 L - -- -- 1,500 -- -- -- 17,345 Total dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... 18,850 14,685 -- 21,130 -- - -- 877,273 (3.57 Miles) (166.15 Miles) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Riprap paving only. Ci) Ci) Ci) Ci) I TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Comin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This Location System FY FY FY struction pleted' FY FY struction pleted FY FY str Main Stem Levees Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District. Levees .................. Old River structures and levees ................... Atchafalaya Basin Levee (16.8) (16.8) (-) (10.7) (--) 15.5 15.5 -- 9.4 - 1.3 1.3 (--) (-) (-) (--) (15.5) -...--.- 15.5 1.3 District ........ ......... . (126.3) (126.3) (1.8) (102.2) (--) Levees.. .................. 118.7 118.7 1.8 94.6 -- Morganza structure and levee ................... Morganza forebay levee ...... Port Allen lock... ..... : ... S Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees . ..... . . .. ... . .. Plaquemines West Levee District Levees............ Buras Levee District ......... Levees.................. Empire lock .............. Baton Rouge front levees ...... Pontchartrain Levee 0.8 6.7 0.1 61.7 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.8 6.7 0.1 (5.3) (-) (1.0) 5.3 - 1.0 (--) (118.7) - 118.7 - 0.8 -- 6.7 - 0.1 61.7 10.9 41.1 7.1 0.1 37.9 2.0 30.7 - (34.1) (3.9) (34.1) (-) 34.0 3.9 34.0 - 0.1 0.1 2.1 2.1 -- 0.1 -- 0.9 District ................. (124.9) (124.9) (3.8) (94.9) (5.0) Levees ..................... 110.8 110.8 3.8 80.8 5.0 Bonnet Carre' guide levees ... 11.3 11.3 -- 11.3 -- Bonnet Carre' forebav levee .. 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 -- Bonnet Carre' structure ... East Jefferson Levee District Levees................ West Jefferson Levee District . Levees ............. ..... Floodwalls ................ Harvey Canal Lock ......... 1.5 1.5 -- 1.5 -- 11.6 11.6 -- 10.8 -- (20.0) (20.0) (-) (16.9) (2.0) 19.8 19.8 -- 16.7 2.0 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- (-) (15.5) -- 15.5 (-) (118.7) -- 118.7 -61.7 - -- -61.7 Curently nder Conuction (-:) 0 (-) -- z -- 0 -- -- - - -- 37.9 - 37.9 -- (--) (-) (-) (-) (34.0) (-) (34.0) (--) -- - -- - 34.0 - 34.0 - -- "-- - -- 2.1 - 2.1 -- (4.7) (-) (-) (-) (110.8) (-) (110.8) (--) 4.7 - -- -. 110.8 - 110.8 -- ---- - -- -. -- -. 11.6 -- 11.6 -- (--) (-) (--) (--) (19.9) (--) (19.9) (--) - -- -. -- 19.8 -- 19.8 -- -- - - - ---- -.- 0--.-1-- -- 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 61.7 TABLE 42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Cornin Total rently System plete rently System plete Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This Location System FY FY FY struction pleted' FY FY struction pleted FY FY st Currently Under Conruction Orleans Levee District ......... (27.2) Left descending, east bank ..... (13.3) Levees .........-..-...-... .-. 4.6 Floodwalls ................ 8.6 IHNC lock ................. 0.1 Right descending, west bank .. (13.9) Levees ...................-... 13.8 Algiers Canal lock ... ...... .0.1 Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees ............ . 11.6 Grand Prairie Levee District Levees.. ...... ...... ...... 37.4 S Total Mississippi River ... 511.6 Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises.. .... .. (148.4) East Bank Atchafalaya River.. 52.5 Bayou des Glaises .......... 7.9 West bank Atchafalaya River.. 60.1 Simmesport Ring ........... 1.6 Melville Ring ...... .... .... 4.1 Krotz Springs Ring ......... 1.7 Mansura Hills to Hamburg ... 20.5 West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ................. 128.7 Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ............ 56.5 Morganza upper guide levee ... 8.9 (27.2) (-) (21.6) (13.3) (-) (9.4) 4.6 - 0.7 8.6 - 8.6 0.1 - 0.1 (13.9) (-) (12.2) 13.8 - 12.1 0.1 - 0.1 11.6 (--) (1.6) 1.6 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (--) (-) (-) 11.6 37.4 - 28.4 511.6 22.4 403.9 (148.4) (-) (143.9) 52.5 - 52.5 7.9 -- 7.9 60.1 -- 55.6 1.6 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- 128.7 - 9.0 25.7 (-) (--) (--) (--) (18.4 (4.6 4.6 (13.8) 13.8 11.6 -- 37.4 -- 479.6 (-) --_ -- -- (--) (--) - - -.-- -- 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 90.9 10.2 56.5 3.4 17.1 8.9 -- 8.9 (--) (148.4) -- 52.5 -- 7.9 -- 60.1 -- 1.6 -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- 20.5 -- 128.7 -- 56.5 -- 8.9 (--) (18.4) (--) (4.6) -- 4.6 (-) (-) -- (-) (13.8) (--) -- 13.8 -- - 11.6 -- -- 37.4 - -- 479.6 - (--) (148.4) (--) -- 52.5 - -- 7.9 - -- 60.1 -- 1.6 -- -- 4.1 -- 1.7 -- -- 20.5 - 128.4 -- 56.5 -- 8.9 10.14 TABLE 42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Location East Protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ................ Total Atchafalaya Basin .... Total-Main Stem Leaves ....... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA..... Item A levees.............. - Item B levees .............. Item C levees ................ co Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .. ................... GRAND TOTAL............. Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grpde and Total O Total ection Cur- In Cornm- Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Corn- This This Con- System FY FY FY struction pleted' FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction 106.7 106.7 4.0 88.3 - - -- - -- 105.0 4.0 86.0 -- 449.2 449.2 7.4 349.1 10.2 -.. . 447.5 4.0 428.2 -- 960.8 960.8 29.8 753.0 35.9 10.1 -- 1.1 -- 927.1 4.0 907.8y -- (17.4) 5.0 10.1 2.3 17.4 978.2 (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 (--) (-) (-) (-) (- (17.4) (--) -- - - - -- 5.0 - - - - - - 10.1 - -- - _- - -- 2.3 - 17.4 978.2 29.8 770.4 35.9 10.1 17.4 -- 1.1 944.5 (17.4) 5.0 10.1 2.3 17.4 4.0 925.2 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 2. Changed to correct previous error. (-) 0 - z 0 Co TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Cornin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted3 FY FY struction pleted FY FY str MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi ...... Greenville Harbor dikes ...... West bank in Arkansas ....... West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .......... Total Mississippi River Levees ................ Other Levees Included in Main i,. Stem Lower Red River-South Bank E Red River levees ....... - Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees .................. Arkansas River, South Bank .. Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem .............. Total-Main Stem Levees .. . . TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank . Red River Backwater Levees .. 178.34 7.8 75.6 178.3 - 109.1 7.8 - 7.8 75.6 2.6 55.0 198.7 198.7 - 67.1 460.4 (59.2) 460.4 2.6 239.0 (59.2) (-) (59.2) 59.2 59.2 85.4 85.4 59.2 - 85.4 144.6 - 144.6 605.0 2.6 383.6 61.55 56.2 - 56.2 263.6 172.2 7.1 172.2 156.9 61.3 - 119.3 1.2 54.3 4.6 93.3 - 69.6 4.6 311.5 1.2 243.2 - 24.7 - 24.7 - 24.7 - 24.7 4.6 336.2 1.2 267.9 - 8.3 174.2 75.4 2.3 197.8 2.3 447.4 - 59.2 - 84.1 - 143.3 2.3 590.7 174.2 75.4 Curently nder Conuction - - $ -- 1/ -4 -4 197.8 - 447.4 (-) (59.2) (-) - 59.2 -- - 81.1 - -- 140.3 -- , -- 587.7 - IO - 47.4 - 47.4 - 249.0 7.1 153.6 (59.2) 8.3 TABLE 42-L (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls Berm' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Com- ( in Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted' FY FY struction pleted FY FY str Yazoo River Basin ........... . (624.1) (357.2) (-) (224.9) (10.6) (--) (-) (--) (-) (624.1) (-) (333.6) Headwater. .............. 527.5 305.6 - 173.3 10.6 -- - -- -- 527.5 -- 294.6 Backwater ............... . . 96.6 51.6 - 51.6 - - - -- -- 96.6 -- 39.0 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .... .. .... .. 949.2 585.6 7.1 453.3 10.6 8.3 - 8.3 - 920.5 7.1 534.6 GRAND TOTAL .. ........... 1,554.2 1,190.6 7.1 836.9 15.2 344.5 0 276.2 2.3 1,511.2 7.1 1,122.3 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 0 4. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 0 H Curently - 'nder Conuction (4.6) 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 '2 H 0z 0' 0 0 Co TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Curently [nder Conuction Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Conin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This Location System FY FY FY struction pleted" FY FY struction pleted FY FY str MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Mounds, IL ................ Mound City, IL ............. Cairo Drainage District....... City of Cairo ............... Little River Drainage District .. Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO........ Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO .............. -A St. Johns Levee and Drainage District... St. Francis Levee District of MO ....... ........ . . City of Hickman, KY ......... Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton, County, KY ......... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ..... Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN......... .... Lake County Levee and Drainage District .. ............... Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 .... ......... Tipton-Obion levee extension... St. Francis Levee District of AR .................... Helena Improvement District No. 1 .................... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1................... 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 59.03 55.7 1.4 16.7 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.7 55.7 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 - 13.8 - 26.0 - 58.7 - 55.7 1.4 -- 1.4 16.7 4.5 4.5 5.2 5.2 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 15.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 5.3 - 16.7 - 4.5 0.5 2.5 1.6 4.4 9.7 0.5 2.5 2.0 4.9 - 4.2 - - 12.9 - 9.2 - 23.0 - 15.1 - 0.6 - 4.9 - 12.0 - 11.4 - 0.3 - 5.2 -- 15.9 -- 21.3 -- 153.2 9.1 -- 1.3 - 84.7 -- 84.7 5.3 2.4 - 3.6 - 3.6 - - 1.1 - 1.1 - - 8.5 - 8.5 - - 4.0 - 3.5 -- C - 19.3 - 19.3 - - 13.8 - 13.8 - - 26.0 - 26.0 - = - 46.9 - 46.1 - - 55.1 -- 55.1 - - 0.5 - - - -- 16.3 - 16.3 - - 4.5 - 4.3 -- - 5.2 - 5.2 - z 6.4 15.9 -- 0.4 -- 83.2 -- 2.4 -- 21.3 - 6.5 5.2 156.7 -- 4.7 - 15.9 -- 21.3 -- 156.7 -- 4.2 23.9 23.9 -- 23.9 19.4' - 19.4' 23.9 2. TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Cornin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Location System FY FY FY struction pletedY FY FY struction pleted FY FY str Curently nder onuction Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR . Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Deshna County, AR........ Iaconia Circle Special Drainage District of Deshna County, AR........ Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District. ......... Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY .................. Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee .................. to Total Mississippi River .... TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES . ; TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River............. East bank ................. West bank ................ Little River................. East bank (left) ............. West bank ................. Elk Chute ................. West Basin and middle valley .. Lower White River........... White River backwater levee ... Augusta to Clarendon ........ Clarendon levee ............. 20.5 20.5 20.5 18.1 18.1 - 6.6 6.6 - 93.6 93.6 -- 4.8 4.8 - 35.3 636.7 636.7 (308.2) 159.5 148.7 (130.1) 40.7 35.1 39.9 14.4 (95.6) 40.2 49.2 - 11.5 18.1 6.6 93.6 12.6 87.3 -- 11.5 - 9.2 - 87.3 4.8 -- 35.3 - 35.3 629.9 - 625.9 629.9 - 625.9 (302.9) - (302.9) 156.2 - 156.2 146.7 - 146.7 (130.1) - (130.1) 40.7 - 40.7 35.1 - 35.1 39.9 -- 39.9 14.4 - 14.4 (85.9) - (84.1) 40.2 -- 40.2 39.5 -- 39.5 6.2 6.2 - 23.8 335.8 335.8 258.3 225588..33 4.4 20.5 - 16.5 - 93.6 -- 4.8 -- 35.3 5.2 604.5 5.2 604.5 - (301.0) - 156.7 - 144.3 -- (128.9) - 40.7 - 35.1 -- 39.7 -- 13.4 - (88.0) - 38.8 -- 49.2 -- 20.5 -- 16.5 C) -I - 93.6 -- 4.8 -- - 35.3 1 - 595.5 -- - 595.5 -- (133.5) 94.7 38.8 (94.5) 40.1 23.7 17.3 13.4 (75.0) 38.8 36.2 �.. -- -- -- 00 -- -- I 0 0 0 CI TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Section Total Total Cur- In Com- Cur- In Cornin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Com- This This Location System FY FY FY struction pletedy FY FY struction pleted/ FY FY str Memphis Harbor ................ 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 10.5 -- 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............... 544.4 529.4 - 527.6 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 528.4 -- 313.5 GRAND TOTAL .............. 1,181.1 1,159.3 - 1,153.5 - 342.8 - 265.3 5.2 1,132.9 - 909.0 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Changed to correct previous error. )-A Curently rnder Con- -uction - -- ONE CI) I TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls BermY Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Com- Cur- In Cornin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This C Location System FY FY FY struction pletedY FY FY struction pleted FY FY str Curantly nder -onuction MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 42-K.................. 511.6 511.6 22.4 403.9 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L.. 460.4 460.4 2.6 239.0 Memphis District, Table 42-M .. 636.7 629.9 - 625.9 Total Mississippi River ...... 1,608.7 1,601.9 25.0 1,268.8 25.7 4.6 30.3 10.1 -- 1.1 311.5 1.2 243.2 335.8 - 258.3 657.4 1.2 502.6 - 479.6 2.3 447.4 5.2 604.5 7.5 1,531.5 ,-w -- 479.6 -- -- 447.4 - -- 595.5 - -- 1,522.5 -' Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway- S NOD.................... SLower Red River-South Bank-- VXD .................... Arkansas River-South Bank-- VXD ..................... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem........... 449.2 7.4 349.1 59.2 - 59.2 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 593.8 593.8 7.4 493.7 Total Main Stem Levees .... 2,202.5 2,195.7 32.4 1,762.5 - TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,-NOD . Yazoo River Basin--VXD ....... Arkansas River-North Bank-- VXD ..................... Red River Backwater--VXD ..... St. Francis River-MD ......... Little River--MD ............. Lower White River--MD ....... 17.4 624.1 61.5 263.6 308.2 130.1 95.6 17.4 -- .17.4 357.2 -- 224.9 56.2 - 56.2 172.2 7.1 172.2 302.9 -- 302.9 130.1 -- 130.1 85.9 -- 84.1 10.2 447.5 -- - - 59.2 24.7 10.2 40.5 10.6 24.7 24.7 - 24.7 682.1 1.2 527.3 84.1 - 590.8 7.5 2,122.3 - -- -- -- 17.4 -- -- -- -- 624.1 8.3 -- 8.3 -- �- 47.4 249.0 301.0 128.9 88.0 4.(0 428.2 -- 59.2 - 81.1 4.0 568.5 4.0 2,091.0 - 17.4 -- 333.6 7.1 -- --. -- 47.4 153.6 133.5 94.5 75.0 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. 3. Changed to correct previous error. 0 0 C) - o - - 4.6 0 Co -- -- � TABLE 42-N (Continued) RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Levees and Floodwalls BermY Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Cornin Total rently System plete rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Cornm- This This Con- Corn- This This C Location System FY FY FY struction pleted- FY FY struction pleted FY FY str Memphis Harbor-MD ......... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 - 7.0 - 7.0 - 10.5 - 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............ ... 1511.0 17132.4 7.1 998.3 10.6 15.3 - 15.3 - I6 3 7.1 865.5 Grand Total in Project ....... . 3,713.5 3,328.1 39.5 2,760.8 51.1 697.4 1.2 542.6 7.5 3,588.6 11.1 2,956.5 1. Landside seepage berms only. 2. Subject to change as planning progresses. C1 .urantly nder .onuction 4.6 4.6 4i (.12 0 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) Bayou des Glaises diversion channel .............. 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 -- Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie .............. 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 -- Charenton drainage and navigation canal .......... 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Wax Lake Outlet ............................. 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 -- Atchafalaya Basin Floodway .................... 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 -- Morganza Floodway........................... 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 -- Old River outflow channel ...................... 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 -- Old River inflow channel ........................ 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 -- Old River lock approach channels ................ 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 -- Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) .............. 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Teche-Vermilion Water Supply .................. 1977 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure inflow channel . 1986 1.9 -- 1.9 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure outflow channel 1988 0.9 -- 0.9 100 -- Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion channel ......... . 1988 1.7 -- 1.7 100 -- 41-66 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River .......................... 1947 199.1 -- 199.1 100 -- Quiver River ................................ 1947 69.6 -- 69.6 100 -- Deer Creek .... o ............................ 1947 7.0 -- 7.0 100 -- Steele Bayou ................................ 1947 54.9 -- 54.9 100 -- Steele Bayou 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 71.2 -- 68.5 96 2.7 Main Canal ................................. 1959 21.1 -- 21.1 100 -- Main Canal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 25.3 -- -- -- -- Black Bayou ................................. -- 36.5 -- -- -- -- Big Sunflower River tributaries .................. 1957 227.2 -- 227.2 100 -- Quiver River tributaries ....................... 1960 35.4 -- 35.4 100 -- YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............................. 1960 39.9 -- 39.9 100 -- YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project .......................... 1976 179.0 -- 58.1 32 -- Coldwater River ............................. 1941 54.6 -- 54.6 100 -- Arkabutla Canal ............................. 1948 0.4 -- 0.4 100 -- Tallahatchie Canal ........................... 1940 74.8 -- 73.5 85 -- Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway . . . .. 1939 48.0 -- 48.0 100 -- Greenwood protection works .................... 1971 2.9 -- 2.9 100 -- Yacona River ................................ 1952 1.8 -- 1.8 100 -- Bobo Bayou .................................. 1944 16.1 -- 16.1 100 -- Cassidy Bayou ............................... 1934 69.0 -- 69.0 100 -- Cassidy Bayou' . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 26.0 -- -- -- -. Bear Creek Diversion .......................... . -- . . 4.8 -- -- -- -- Lake Cormorant .............................. -- 20.9 -- -- -- -- Hurricane Bayou ............................. -- 2.5 -- -- -- -- Opossum Bayou........................ ..... -- 20.8 -- -- -- -- Abaica Creek ................................ -- 7.7 -- -- -- -- Chicopa Creek ............................... -- 7.0 -- -- -- -- Bear Creek ................................. -- 23.3 -- -- -- Rocky Bayou ................................ -- 7.8 -- -- --- Whiteoak Bayou .............................. -- 55.9 -- -- -.-- Miscellaneous ditches ......................... -- 12.3 -- -- - -- Yalobusha River .............................. 1939 46.0 -- 46.0 100 -- Yazoo River ................................. 1940 160.2 -- 160.2 100 -- Whittington Auxiliary Channel ................. .. 1956 30.8 -- 30.8 100 -- Tchula Lake ................................ 1964 26.4 -- 26.4 100 -- David-Burrell Bayou ........................... 1957 40.4 -- 40.4 100 -- McKinney Bayou ............................. 1960 3.5 -- 3.5 100 -- Hillside Floodway ............................ 1964 11.0 -- 11.0 100 -- Yazoo City protection works .................... . 1953 1.6 -- 1.6 100 -- Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ....................... . 1975 30.2 -- 15.1 50 -- 41-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: (Continued) VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location .Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS (Continued) Alligator-Catfish Bayou ........................ . 1973 8.3 -- 8.2 99 -- Pelucia Creek ............................... 1975 13.7 -- 5.6 40 8.1 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ............................. 1949 45.3 -- 45.3 100 -- Bayou Lafourche4' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 -- 4.4 10 -- Big & Colewa Creeks........................... 1947 81.4 -- 81.4 100 -- Big & Colewa Creeks5' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 -- 51.5 60 -- Tensas River ................................ 1947, 96.5 -- 96.5 100 -- Tensas River 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 165.0 -- 61.0 37 -- BoeufRiver,AR and LA ....................... 1953 103.9 -- 103.9 100 -- Fleschmans Bayou, AR ........................ 1963 6.6 -- 6.6 100 -- Caney Bayou, AR ............................ 1964 7.4 -- 7.4 100 -- Canal 18, AR ................................ 1963 10.3 -- 10.3 100 -- Big Bayou, AR ................................ 1952 33.3 -- 33.3 100 -- Black Pond Slough, AR.......................... 1962 14.3 -- 14.3 100 -- Bayou Macon, AR and LA ....................... 1959 150.8 -- 150.8 100 -- RushBayou,AR ............................ 1964 6.7 -- 6.7 100 -- Canal 19,AR................................ 1957 50.2 -- 50.2 100 -- Canal 43, AR ................................ 1956 34.5 -- 34.5 100 -- Canal 81, AR ............................... .. 1957 32.7 -- 32.7 100 -- Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff.......... .......... ........ -- 17.1 -- -- -- -- Kirsch Lake Canal.............................. -- 9.3 -- -- -- -- Canal 19 Extension ............................ 1964 9.4 -- 9.4 100 -- Lake Chicot Pumping Plant...................... -- 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Mill Bayou.................................. 1955 4.8 -- 4.8 100 -- RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ................. 1976 6.9 -- 6.9 100 -- Six Mile Bayou, LA . . .... . ... ... .. ...... .. ... . -- 1.5 -- 1.5 100 -- GRAND PRAIRIE, AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 338.1 -- -- -- -- BAYOU METO, AR8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 164.9 -- -- -- -- 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 8. Deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989. 41-68 TABLE 42-Q MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1993) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ............................. ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ...................... St. Francis River, MO and AR ................... West Memphis Drainage, AR.................... Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ................ Tyronza River, AR ............................ L'Anguille River, AR .......................... LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ....................... Big Creek and tributaries, AR .................. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ............................. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ................. Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) .............................. Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ............. Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ................... MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West TN tributaries (1948 Act) ..................... Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Nonconnah Creek, MS and TN .................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Helena Harbor, AR21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1952 1963 1953 1951 1960 1939 (1) 1972 (1) (1) 1952 (1) 1974 1955 1961 1960 1990 1989 9.6 298.9 638.5 19.8 28.0 12.7 95.0 -9- .5 .100 0 1.0 283.7 502.1 19.8 28.0 12.7 -W 231.5 -- 7.2 103.8 -- -- 41.71 34.3 9.3 15.8 19.7 34.3 -- 3.0 -- 19.7 225.0 -- 89.8 25.5 -- 25.5 18.2 2.25 -- 0.5 38 1. Not started. 2. Data for Stage 1 only. 41-69 , 95 81 100 100 100 4.0 -- 3 100 19 100 41 100 0.5 _ __ _I __ __ ___ __ n __ 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ON CIVIL.WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-R .:PUMPNG STATIONS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete .Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Bayou Yokely 489 100 1955 1990 100 1991(A) Bayou Yokely Enlargement 568 100 1963 1990 100 1991(A) Centerville 332 100 1964 1991 100 1992(A) Ellerslie 136 100 1953 -- -- -- Franklin 144 100 1958 1992 100 1993(A) Franklin Enlargement 144 100 1978 1992 100 1993(A) Gordy 238 100 1964 -- -- -- Maryland 136 100 1957 1991 100 1992(A) North Bend 52 100 1962 -- -- -- Tiger Island 75 100 1955 -- -- -- Wax Lake East 1,008 100 1961 1990 100 1992(A) Wax Lake West 496 100 1965 1990 100 1992(A) Teche Vermilion 1,300 100 1982 -- -- -- PT Coupee 1100 1983 -- -- -- TOTAL 6,618 41-70 TABLE 42-S MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION PUMPING STATIONS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY. Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Chauvin Bayou, LA 250 99 1994 1991 100 Bawcomville 270 100 1955 19921 5 1993 Jonesville 180 100 1952 -- -- -- Natchez Port 100 -- -- - -- -- Wilson Point 50 -..- Greenwood - Lee Street 90 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Wilson Street 67 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood- Walker Lake 675 100 1949 1952 -- -- Yazoo City 540 100 1954 1957 -- -- West Monroe 488 -- -- -- -- -- Columbia 45 100 1939 -- -- -- Calion 200 100 1959 -- -- McKinney Bayou, MS 250 100 1962 1961 -- -- Lake Chicot 6,500 100 1987 -- - -- Tensas Cocodrie 4,000 100 1986 -- -- Yazoo Backwater 10,000 -- -- -- - -- Natchez Area 300 - -- - - -- Bushley Bayou 300 -- Indef' .. Bushley Bayou 20 -- Indef' -- -- - Sicily-HAHA Bayou 750 -- 2000"-) -- -- Sicily - Fool River 300 -- 1997 -- -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #1 10 -- 1993 1991 -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #2 15 -- 1993 1991 -- -- Pelucia Creek Pump 75 -- 1993 1992 -- -- Below Red River 500 -- Indef' -. Bayou Rapides2 222 100 1936 -- -- -- Total 26,197 1 This project has been placed in the inactive category. 2 Corps did not construct. 3 This project has been deferred indefinitely. 41-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-T PUMPING.STATIONS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT,. Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Devall's Bluff 215 100 1949 1987 100 1989 Des Arc, Ark. 30 100 1954 -- -- -- Ensley 900 100 1966 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #1 375 100 1 Huxtable Pumping Plant 12,000 100 1977 -- -- -- Graham Burke 1,500 100 1964 -- -- -- Finley Street 100 100 1978 -- -- -- Dyersburg 26 100 1961 - -- Cotton Slough 50 100 1964 -- -- -- West Hickman 190 100 1976 -- -- -- Cypress Creek 3,000 100 1944 -- -- -- Fairfax 53.5 100 1950 -- -- -- Goose Pond 110 100 1976 -- -- -- Marble Bayou 220 100 1952 -- -- -- Workhouse Bayou 520 100 1950 -- -- -- Nonconnah 1,620 100 1944 -. -- -- L&DD #3 Peafield 400 100 1 Treasure Island 150 100 1976 -- -- Lake No. 9 500 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 10th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 28th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #2 700 100 1981 -- -- -- Drinkwater Sewer 150 100 1979 -- -- -- May Street 5 100 1948 -- -- -- Cairo 22nd Street 37 100 1-. Gayoso Bayou 1,500 100 1915 -- -- -- Mud Lake 200 -- -- -- -- -- Madison 25 - -- -- -- -- Cache River 200 -- -- -- -. New Madrid 1,500 -- -- -- -- St. John's Bayou 1000 -- - -- -- TOTAL 27,406.5 1 Unknown constructed by local interest. 41-72 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake Subtotal Memphis District: General investigations Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin White River Backwater Cache Basin, AR Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping LWR, Augusta to Clarendon Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-K Mud Lake, TN Eight Mile Creek Helena Harbor L'Anguille River Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS West Memphis & Vicinity Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Memphis Harbor (McKeller Lake) Lake #9 Pumping Plant, KY Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee Dam Safety Assurances Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Mississippi Delta Region Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin 1,412,231 9,959,957 31,373 22,593,457 1,604,800 525 7,373 2,896 261,705 5,431,209 1,208 67,903 1,801,624 32,026 296,905 $ 3,730,670 3,730,670 3,448,452 7,921,407 1,608,588 21,163,373 783,031 202,530 648,573 29,097 $ -- 2,172,920 -- -- -- 43,505,193 35,805,053 2,172,920 .-- 1,103,753 4,388,973 1,013,549 -- -- 268,310 -- 2,680,397 5,017,378 -- 42,785,285 27,617,136 -- 12,956,945 10,999,187 -- -- 370,698 -- -- 334,814 -- -- 23,572 -- 617,714 -- -- 63,429,314 45,644,645 1,103,753 10,421,163 1,894,558 18,464,088 2,791,676 69,359 3,403,466 101,974 10,900,572 573,459 41-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-U (Continued) COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Item Construction Maintenance Other New Orleans District (Continued): Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 2,375,090 -- -- Channel improvement 46,961,024 16,090,217 -- Mississippi & LA Estuarine 372,797 -- -- B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp -- 120,633 -- Inspection of completed works -- 183,029 -- Mapping -- 225,080 -- Subtotal 80,488,719 33,886,006 573,459 Total Federal Funds 187,423,226 119,066,374 3,850,132 CONTRIBUTED FUNDS St. Louis District -- -- 622 New Orleans District: Atchafalaya Basin -- Old River -- 77,833 -- Mississippi Delta Region 47,642 -- -- Total Contributed Funds 47,642 77,833 622 Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 187,470,868 119,144,206 3,850,754 41-74 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND . TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1993 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, AR Contraction works DeValls Bluff, AR Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,054 39,546,054 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 - 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,031 17,384,031 -- New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 41-75 I cn or-O REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROMMAY:15, 1928, THROUGH SEP.30, 1993. Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and'Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 New Orleans District: (Continued) Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings ' Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 0 O n/1- " 3O,117 OO,1 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 579,462 579,462 -- 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 2477442 2447442 -- 185,312,354 98,000 386,107,369 58,566,439 192,685,900 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 254,425,182 965,429 51,955,092 183,875,455 98,000 385,324,772 58,566,439 192,018,881 439,434 7,894,980 9,019,908 253,550,869 965,429 51,951,591 1,436,899 -- 782,596 -- 667,019 20 -- 874,313 3,501 41-76 nOF7 "1 n" lF 7 ,d- - , - - & MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1993 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS West Memphis and Vicinity Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Helena Harbor Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN L'Anguille River Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg District: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Section 6 Levees Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Tensas River Red River Backwater: Below Red River Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Ouachita River Levees Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City 505,715 1,788,846 10,624,501 865,000 3,547,000 7,222,000 570,000 108,651 44,241,900 14,483,000 10,720,000 1,440,000 107,000 196,000 1,993,000 1,245,882,720 219,219,990 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 96,172,400 41,507,200 639,400 74,467,046 55,058,900 756,300 39,800,000 452,885,065 23,549,260 136,807,040 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 505,703 1,788,699 10,624,501 738,805 3,507,819 7,152,892 569,540 108,651 43,620,717 12,571,275 10,477,411 1,439,545 98,024 181,884 1,954,010 1,239,045,235 215,495,385 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 95,639,986 41,505,235 639,400 72,664,282 55,038,073 756,300 39,800,000 446,692,259 23,549,260 130,879,229 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 41-77 12 147 126,195 39,181 69,108 460 621,183 1,911,725 242,589 455 8,976 14,116 38,990 6,837,485 3,724,605 532,414 1,965 1,802,764 20,827 6,192,806 5,927,811 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1993 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin--Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries--Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater Rocky Bayou Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant Muddy Bayou Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation Yazoo Basin Reevaluation Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Miss. & LA Estuarine Channel Improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River Navigation Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River 1,839,994,610 34,506,000 5,008,008 1,564,000 35,945,266 920,137,117 18,056,600 200,680 291,514,000 23,379,520 703,019,537 303,463 30,452,000 292,274,000 1,808,984,446 34,506,000 5,008,008 1,504,642 35,945,266 907,947,895 18,056,600 200,680 287,751,384 23,117,617 697,150,284 303,463 26,173,236 292,274,000 31,010,163 59358 59,358 12,189,222 -- 3,762,616 261,903 5,869,253 4,278,764 --. 2,356,360,191 2,329,939,075 26,421,116 5,444,714,962 5,380,446,199 64,268,764 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 41-78 10,950,966 59,809,000 34,427,300 87,839,036 96,738,166 612,484 23,977,200 56,756,200 3,407,500 9,064,850 5,145,200 5,283,900 14,634,170 14,767,000 119,194,900 9,169,000 10,950,966 58,903,206 34,427,273 85,552,502 95,583,655 612,484 23,977,200 56,642,951 3,401,224 9,064,850 5,145,200 5,037,652 14,335,390 14,767,000 112,753,101 7,815,248 905,794 27 2,286,534 1,154,511 113,249 6,276 -- 246,248 298,781 6,441,799 1,353,752 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1993 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 Memphis District: (Continued) Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RECREATION FACILITIES--COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Project Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Jul. 17, 1941 65,000 175,000 350,000 KA A AAAn' 65,000 175,000 350,000 PZAA nnn 4v,vvv 4*,UUU -- 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 965,247 965,247 -- 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- 5,614,616,162 5,550,347,398 64,268,764 2,405,300 2,405,300 -- 203,286 203,286 -- 2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 7,673,109 10,281,695 5,624,897,857 2,449,621,855 7,673,109 10,281,695 5,560,629,093 2,425,837,945 64,268,764 23,783,910 41-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1993 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1993 Vicksburg District: (Continued) Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 88,737,381 87,780,473 956,909 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 8,209,270,393 8,120,260,811 89,009,582 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1993 8,241,339,302 8,152,329,720 89,009,582 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. 41-80 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-W COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 2,628,500 2,510,000 3,774,000 3,704,000 88,737,381 (Regular Funds)' Cost 2,903,198 2,610,794 3,642,732 3,850,132 87,780,473 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 216,161,500 215,162,000 217,256,000 216,540,520 5,444,714,962 Cost 209,946,171 217,709,941 236,938,418 187,423,226 5,380,446,199 Maintenance Allotted 113,768,000 126,690,000 132,439,000 134,142,000 2,449,621,855 Cost 110,049,671 129,231,497 131,656,191 119,066,374 2,425,837,945 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- - 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- - 14,885,992 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 General Investigation Contributed -- - -- 6,500 6,500 Cost -- -- -- 622 622 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 1,845,800 195,910 -- 1,541,000 16,906,680 Cost 2,185,585 726,505 2,309 47,642 15,351,668 Maintenance Contributed 85,742 14,423 -- 54,773 2,742,600 Cost 65,698 7,700 171,638 77,833 2,701,824 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1993): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1993 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: $5,614,196,390 10,281,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 88,737,381 2,449,621,855 $5,656,010,857 14,900,300 2,538,359,236 32,068,909 8,241,339,302 41-81 TABLE 42-W (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 93 Sep. 30, 1993 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1993 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 8,209,792,152 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,6079475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1993;: 8,241,339,302 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 90: $332,558,000 FY 92: $353,469,000 FY 91:,$344,362,000 FY 93: $354,386,520 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 1978, teletype. 41-82 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 TABLE 42-X MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 93 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Alexandria, LA-12743 $ 383,188 Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res-12026 $ 34 Subtotal 417,206 Vicksburg District Natchez, MS-12675 75 South Bank Levee, Bayou Rapides, LA-10220 70782 Subtotal 70,857 Memphis District Jackson & Trenton, TN- 12874 $108,183 Newport Harbor, MS-10361 28,433 St. Francis River Below Wappapello (Whiteman's Creek)-22000 36,600 St. Francis River F&WL, AR & MO-79690 468 Subtotal 173,684 TOTAL (Category 110) $661,747 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District 149,848 Memphis District 87241 TOTAL (Category 120) 237,089 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (141) Memphis District Eastern Arkansas Regional- Comprehensive Study- 81266 $979,648 Whiteman's Creek, AR - 1273871,818 $1,051,466 TOTAL (Category 140) 1,051,466 41-83 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-X (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE' GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 93 Categories PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) Memphis District Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY-77009 202 Helena AR & Vicinity-81280 249,975 Lower White River Big Creek & Trib-12472 378,455 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy-77005 9,060 Whiteman's Creek, AR-12738 100522 TOTAL (Category 160) 738,214 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 2,688,516 41-84 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORIES The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) at Champaign, Illinois is the lead Army facility for conducting research on infrastructure and environmental issues for installations. This mission includes research in the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance, and environmental quality for both Military and Civil Works facilities. During FY93, significant accomplishments by USACERL in Civil Works included: (1) Research investigated tough urethane coatings as potential replacements for currently used vinyl coatings on Corps dams. Use of these coatings will allow compliance with the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) air pollution regulations being enacted in various states. Research on coatings for damp surfaces will allow the application of coatings to gates in place, without removing the gates pit areas. Laboratory evaluation of fusion-bonded coatings will allow these solventless coatings to be specified on sheet piling and other structural members to meet EPA requirements for shop-applied coatings. (2) Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation (REMR) Management Systems continue to be developed within the Operations Management Problem Area. Objective, uniform condition rating systems and procedures, coupled with computerized database management and economic analyses, provide decision support for REMR-type activities on Civil structures. (3) Two training courses were conducted for USACE personnel on the inspection and rating of miter gates, concrete lockwalls, and steel sheet pile. (4) The REMR Management System for tainter gates was completed. (5) The condition rating system for concrete gravity dams was completed. (6) Training was conducted for representatives of all 9 coastal divisions on condition rating procedures for rubble breakwaters and jetties. Development of condition rating procedures for non-rubble breakwaters and jetties began. (7) Development testing and demonstration of a variety of coatings for control of Zebra Mussels at Corps and other public facilities were conducted and an integrated, multi-year R&D plan was completed. 42-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), in Hanover, New Hampshire, maintains the finest research and engineering staff and facilities in the world for the study of cold regions science and technology. CRREL's experience spans 50 years, starting with the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of CRREL in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (ACFEL) and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment (SIPRE), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland, and Greenland, put the Nation's and DoD's principal cold regions exper-tise in one place. CRREL's traditional program involves the study of the earth's cold regions, focusing on basic and applied scientific research and on expanding the technologies required for both military and civil works development and operations. CRREL was the first organization in the world to recover complete ice cores from the Greenland and Antarctic ice caps to analyze the world's climate over the past 100,000 years. This accomplishment has served as a platform for the present international global change research effort. CRREL also provided engineering support for the design and construction of the Alyeska Oil Pipeline in Alaska, early exploration and scientific work in Antarctica, and helped develop engineering testing methods and design criteria for construction in cold regions that are used as national and international standards. CRREL has developed river ice technology and management systems that allow cost-effective use of the Nation's 25,000 miles of inland waterways throughout the winter. CRREL's unique mission strongly supports a changing Corps, a changing Army, and a changing nation. CRREL recognizes its responsibility to use its exceptionally creative scientists and engineers to assist the Corps in its mission as engineer-defender and builder of a new nation. Worn-out and outmoded infrastructure; environmental degradation of land, water, and air; increased awareness of the need to understand and master the complexities of the global environment; the apparent end of the cold war; and increased international economic pressures making long-term investment in research and development difficult-all of these cry out for innovative and effective action. The Corps has responded decisively and effectively to the challenge of new mission responsibility, and CRREL has been at the leading edge of this effort. Other priority national programs to which CRREL has contributed significantly include work in pavement and transportation systems for the Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Highway Administration, including participation in the Strategic Highway Research Program. CRREL continues to be a principal consultant to the National Science Foundation in its Arctic, Antarctic, and Greenland Ice Sheet research programs. CRREL works with the Department of the Interior to study the effects of global climate change on water regimes in the north, and has been a significant participant with the Navy to develop DoD initiatives to complement the U.S. Global Climate Change Program. CRREL also provides support to DoE and EPA concerning the environmental characterization and restoration of toxic and hazardous materials in the special conditions of permafrost and high-latitude environments. Private industry also comes to CRREL for assistance not available in the private sector. CRREL has developed the principal guidelines for minimizing the impact of ice on winter navigation, forecasting ice conditions on inland waterways, and designing structures that must withstand ice forces. Current emphasis is on the development of low-cost techniques for controlling ice jam-induced flooding. Low cost is critical, because small communities must be able to afford to use the techniques. CRREL is the Program Manager for the Corps Remote Sensing R&D Program, developing a team approach that exploits the 43-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 capabilities of the Corps labs, other agencies, and. academia to bring the best data acquisition and spatial data management capabilities into the Corps District offices. CRREL also executes the Corps Water Resources of Cold Regions Research Program, developing methods to more accurately predict snowmelt and snow hydrology in watersheds for water control and flood forecasting operations. As the Army's center of expertise, CRREL conducts cold regions scientific and engineering research that addresses problems encountered by the Army and other DoD agencies wherever accom-plishment of their mission is impacted by winter/cold regions effects. CRREL's unique and capable research staff and facilities are matched to its equally unique mission. CRREL's 347 employees include many of the world's experts on snow, ice, frozen ground, and cold regions engineering. The dominant in-house execution of programs, coupled with a very rigorous peer review, has maintained the high level of staff expertise and the Laboratory's reputation as the best of its kind in the world. CRREL's national and international reputation has been its most effective recruiting tool and attracts high-quality scientists and engineers to perpetuate the excellence of the technical staff. FACILITIES The combination and variety of specialized research and experimental facilities at CRREL is unequaled in the world. The main laboratory contains 26 coldrooms that can be operated at temperatures as low as -500 F, a computer center, chemistry laboratories, a wellequipped soil physics laboratory, a cleanroom complex, soil chemistry facilities, and a remote sensing analysis center. Specialized equipment includes low-temperature materials testing machines, gas chromatography-mass spectrometers, atomic absorption spectro-meters, super-critical fluid chromatography, a low-temperature electron microscope, a dual gamma nondestructive testing device, a Hopkinson pressure-bar impact test device, and nuclear magnetic resonance equipment. The Ice Engineering Facility (IEF) is one of the largest refrigerated hydraulics laboratories in the world. It contains a research area for large-scale refrigerated hydraulic models, a refrigerated flume, and a wind tunnel for simulating drifting snow; it also includes the only active low-temperature, ice towing tank in the United States. It serves the civil works needs of the Corps, the Navy's needs for testing the ice capability of its surface and submarine hulls, and, when necessary, provides support to private industry. The Frost Effects Research Facility (FERF) is a 29,000-square-foot refrigerated soils laboratory consisting of 12 test cells that are individually temperature-controlled. Pavements, base and subbase courses, and buried utilities can be tested here at fullscale. Six to eight natural freeze/thaw cycles can be simulated in a single year using refrigeration panels. Unique in the world, the FERF is a facility that supports research needs of the DoD and other Federal agencies, such as FAA and FHWA. A building to house the Army Corps of Engineers Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Center was occupied in mid-1993. The Center provides a focus for assisting the Corps District offices in exploiting the rapidly expanding capabilities of remote sensing and 'geographical information systems technologies in the execution of their water resources and environmental regulatory missions. Construction on a Technical Information Analysis Center has been completed and the Center will be occupied within the next month. This Center will house the Information Management and the DoD Cold Regions Information Analysis Center functions at CRREL. CRREL is recognized as having the world's foremost collection of cold regions scientific and technical literature. More than 2,000 requests for information are filled each year. In addition, the Bibliography on Cold Regions Science and Technology is prepared at the Library of Congress under joint CRREL/NSF sponsorship. It contains more than 140,000 citations of world cold regions literature, including approximately 50,000 Russian items. The Cold Laboratory Complex at CRREL is the only major low-temperature physical sciences complex in the Nation. It supports work for the three military services as well as other Federal agencies, such as the Geological Survey and the National Science Foundation. The CRREL Sleepers River Experimental Watershed in Danville, Vermont, was named a national site for study of climate change in conjunction with the 43-2 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY Department of the Interior. CRREL's Permafrost Research Site at Farmer's Loop, Alaska, and the close association of CRREL's Alaska Projects Office with military units in Alaska provide day-to-day interaction with the user. The research infrastructure at CRREL is the foundation of the unique capabilities of the Laboratory. These facilities must remain state of the art and costefficient to operate and to meet environmental compliance requirements. Key elements of the CRREL strategy are: o Extend cold-unique capabilities; o Increase flexibility and efficiency; o Enhance value to private sector. Future initiatives include installation of a highfrequency load bridge device to support collaborative low-temperature pavements performance efforts with the FHWA, building an annex to the Frost Effects Research Facility to triple its research throughput, generation of a larger wind tunnel to facilitate snow control and icing research, and increasing the utility of the remote research sites operated by CRREL in Vermont and Alaska. RESEARCH PROGRAM CRREL's basic research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in environmental quality; boundary layer processes; and the physical, mechanical, and chemical proper-ties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice, and frozen soils. Basic research supports applied research in the major cold regions mission areas of: o Ice jam floods; o Winter navigation; o Remote sensing for civil works; o Base support; o Infrastructure design and construction; o Combat operations and materiel performance. Major civil works cold regions research topics include Ice Engineering, River Ice Management, River Confluence Ice, Water Resources in Cold Regions, Remote Sensing, and the Construction Productivity Advancement Research program. CRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with Federal and state agencies, where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the cold regions scientific and engineering expert for the Corps of Engineers, CRREL supports districts and divisions by publishing field engi-neering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and making field visits to consult on engineering problems. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY 93 CRREL provides a world-class capability not available in academia or industry through its highly focused mission, one-of-a-kind research and engineering facilities, and renowned technical staff, making it an invaluable and unique resource for the Army, DoD, and the Nation. The synergism of applying these assets to a broad range of military and civilian problems, and the ability to sustain a critical mass of resources in a highly specialized and sophisticated area, contribute significantly to CRREL's effectiveness as an organization. Work for Private Industry A major initiative at CRREL for the last four years has been the development of collaborative research efforts with private industry. The thrust of this effort has been to take advantage of existing legislation such as the Stevenson-Wydler Act of 1980, the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, and section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 to provide technical support and conduct cooperative research with private industry partners. This legislation allows Federal laboratories to enter cooperative research and development agreements (CRDAs) and technical assistance agreements (TAAs) with private industry partners. In the case of the Water Resources Act, technical assistance can be provided to U.S. firms competing for international work. During FY 93, CRREL entered into 12 CRDAs, a single-year record for the Corps, with a variety of partners including industry and state and local governments. Partners in FY 93 included the Alaska Science and Technology Foundation for development of a horizontal thermosyphon for stabilizing foundations in the Arctic, Balsam Environmental Consultants for hydraulic conductivity evaluations of 43-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 landfill cap soils, the Electric Power Research Institute for demonstration of a CRREL-patented sludge freeze separator, and Mobil Chemical Company for lowtemperature evaluation of recycled plastics for guardrail-post material. A good indicator of the success of cooperative programs with non-Federal partners is the number of repeat partners interested in new or expanded efforts with the Federal partner. During FY 93, based on the success of previous cooperative efforts, CRREL entered into new agreements with Mobil on the ice forces program, and NHDOT on two pavements studies. In addition, CRREL's partner on a technology assistance agreement, Alden Research Lab, requested a modification to its agreement with CRREL to jointly perform additional evaluation of ice jam problems at a Niagara Power project. One of the most meaningful metrics of a laboratory's capabilities and uniqueness is the desire of the private sector to collaborate on technical programs, as partners or to solicit specific technical support. With 22 active and 12 new Cooperative R&D Agreements, CRREL's involvement with the private sector continues to grow. CRREL is also participating in the first Technology Assistance Agreement for the Army, assisting Alden Research Laboratory of Massachusetts, in winning an international contract for ice jam control on the Niagara River. Productivity In FY 93, CRREL published and distributed 185 scientific and engineering documents (18 CRREL Reports; 2 Monographs; 23 Special Reports; 38 journal articles; 84 conference papers; 9 miscellaneous publications; and 11 other CoE, DA, and government publications). CRREL'S CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAM There are four major thrusts and one new initiative in CRREL's civil works R&D program: o The Ice Engineering Program has developed the Nation's principal guidance for winter navigation, river ice management, and ice jam flood control. In severe winters, ice jams are responsible for more than $100 million in damage due to ice-induced flooding. Efforts to alleviate and control ice jams and ice-induced flooding have helped reduce their cost to the Nation. o CRREL is the Program Manager of the Corps of Engineers Civil Works Remote Sensing Research and Development Program. The Program emphasizes the exploitation of real-time in-situ sensors and commercially available satellite imagery and integration of these data into a spatial data management system. Development and utilization of remote sensing technology for civil works applications in water and natural resources are urgently needed to provide cost-effective information necessary for many of the Corps engineering, operations, and planning missions. o In the Water Resources of Cold Regions Program, the USGS joined CRREL in conducting research at the Sleepers River Research Watershed. This partnership has filled a significant gap, with the USGS undertaking biogeochemical research in conjunction with our snowmelt research. Work continues on developing an improved snowmelt runoff module for CoE hydrologic models, with additional studies focusing on the partly glacierized basins. A deliberate shift to understand the hydroclimatic regimes in northern wetlands was undertaken because of the lack of and need for knowledge in this technical area. o The Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program is a cost-shared partnership between the Corps of Engineers, the U.S. construction industry, academia institutions, state and local governments, and other groups. Its purpose is to cooperatively advance the research innovation in the U.S. construction industry, thereby enhancing its productivity and competitiveness. This is a cooperative program with WES, CERL, and TEC. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Ice Engineering Program Ice Jam Flood Emergency Support CRREL provided assistance to Corps Districts and Divisions in ice jam flood studies and other ice-related 43-4 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY problems. CRREL responded to requests for assistance from the Omaha District during severe ice jam flooding at the confluences of the Platte River with the Elkhorn and Loup Rivers that threatened the well fields serving as a source for the water supply of Lincoln, Nebraska. For the Buffalo District, CRREL initiated a study of the ice regime in the Ashtabula River and its tributaries and its potential impact on the disruption and transport of contaminated sediments in Ashtabula Harbor. For the New England Division, CRREL responded to requests for assistance during ice jam flood events and suggested means of preventing icing events to be incorporated in the Saugus River flow control structure design. Low-Cost Ice Control Structures Under the Ice Engineering Research Program, lowcost ice control structures for both freezeup and breakup conditions of the ice cover were developed through model studies in the Hydraulic Research Area of CRREL's Ice Engineering Facility. In particular, the use of manufactured or quarried stone blocks to control breakup jams and subsequent flooding in small-tomedium streams showed signi-ficant promise while being environmentally sound. This concept will be field-tested during 1994-95. Ice Jam Database An ice jam database has been developed to provide historical information for use by Corps Districts and Federal, state and local agencies in ice jam miti-gation studies. This database contains more than 7,000 entries and is continuously updated. Ice Effects Added to Corps Model A subroutine to the HEC-2 program, ICETHK, which calculates backwater effects due to ice accumulations in rivers and streams, has been developed and is now operational. Measurement of Ice Forces on Bridges New instrumentation for measuring ice forces on bridge piers and to detect and measure bed scour during flood events was developed and tested at a field site on the White River in Vermont. Remote Sensing Program The Remote Sensing/GIS Center provided remote sensing and spatial database products and tools to the Corps user community as part of the Civil Works Remote Sensing Research Program. Remotely sensed imagery (SPOT, LANDSAT TM, and SAR) was used for flood inundation delineation in the Flood of '93. Methods were employed for rapid digital map generation and were used in emergency management functions for the Missouri, Mississippi, Illinois, Des Moines, Republican, and Grand Rivers. Other remotely sensed products were delivered to Corps field offices for studies in the areas of flood plain elevation, plant habitat, lake ice profiles, snow cover distribution, and soil moisture in FY 93. In addition to the remotely sensed and spatial database products, computer techniques were developed for enabling rapid access, display, and analysis of large data files. In FY 93 a great deal of progress was made on integrating emerging remote sensing and GIS technological advances into CoE engineering, planning, and operational functions. Examples are: o Movement of vector data between a wide range of CAD and GIS platforms; o Integration of spatial data concepts into water control relational and time-series database management systems; o Development of training courses for utilization of spatial databases in Corps mission areas. Cold Regions Water Resources Snowmelt Studies and Stream Runoff Processes The meteorological instrumentation in Sleepers River Watershed was completely upgraded to state-of-the-art equipment, and two new sites were established to better monitor the hydrologic response of snowmelt in coniferous forests. Groundwater contribution to runoff during the snowmelt period in 1993 accounted for more than 50% of flow in all basins, and 71% in one forested basin, signifying that surface and groundwater interactions are very important. The USGS continues to be a major partner in the operation of Sleepers River Watershed, performing stream gaging at seven sites while also conducting water and soil geochemical research under their WEBB program to complement CRREL's snowmelt research. The site is used by graduate students from the University of New Hampshire and Syracuse University for part of their thesis work. 43-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Winter Low Flows A study of winter low flows in the White River, South Dakota, a cold arid basin, has found that the water going into freezing of the ice cover can account for 50% of monthly basin yields in an average winter. Extreme values have approached 80-90% for very cold winters and below average river flows. Runoff and Sediment Yield for Glacierized and Permafrost Basins Reports were published on Glaciohydrologic and Hydraulic Effects on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Glacierized Basins, Snowmelt Runoff, Total Solids Production in a Discontinuous Permafrost Basin, and Monitoring Gravel Movement in Rivers, with an emphasis on assisting the Alaska District. Field data collected on the Matanuska Glacier continued in collaboration with Lehigh University; graduate students are using the site for thesis subjects with funding from the National Science Foundation. Coarse gravel movement in steep streams using radios in rocks has been partially supported by this work unit in collaboration with the USGS-Alaska. Construction Productivity Advancement Research The CPAR program continues to be an excellent mechanism for cooperation with industry on research topics important to both the private sector and the Corps of Engineers. Projects include demonstrating the effectiveness of foam insulation frost-shielding technology for shallow burial of utilities, such as water and sewer lines. The insulation technology will be marketed by an industrial partner. Two ongoing CPAR projects that will have a major impact on the construction industry are efforts with the Minnesota DOT and CH2M Hill. The Minnesota project has demonstrated the effectiveness of mechanistic pavement design techniques on a road project near Minneapolis, where a series of highway test sections have been constructed using CRREL-developed design procedures. The resistance of landfill caps to freeze/thaw deterioration has been evaluated in the project with CH2M Hill. This effort has studied the effectiveness of a variety of state-of-the-art landfill cap technologies to resist freeze/thaw degradation. Low-Temperature Concrete Admixtures Under separate CPAR studies with two commercial partners (Master Builders and W.R. Grace), CRREL has been working to develop a practical and effective antifreeze admixture to allow placement of concrete at below-freezing temperatures. The CPAR studies have resulted in successful tests down to -50C using chemicals already approved by the industry for use in concrete. This should greatly facilitate the acceptance of these products for general use. By having a different successful admixture for each private sector partner, two new and competi-tive products will be introduced into the marketplace, avoiding reliance on a single source. These admixtures will be subjected to field demonstrations during the winter of 1993-94. Additional CRREL independent research with antifreeze admixtures has developed one that may be effective down to -150 C. 43-6 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES Background The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) has served the Corps, the Army, and the Nation with technical accomplishments in a variety of engineering and scientific fields for nearly 65 years. From its beginning in 1929 as a small hydraulics laboratory established to assist in developing a comprehensive plan for flood control of the Mississippi River, WES has grown into a 280-hec-tare complex of six centrally managed laboratories that is the largest and most diverse civil and environmental research and development organization in the world. With pride in its past, confidence in the present, and a clear vision of the future, WES dedicated its headquarters building in October 1985 in honor of the late BG Herbert D. Vogel, founder and first Director of WES. Vogel was instrumental in developing hydraulic research techniques that helped to mold federal water resources development. Presently, WES has unparalleled experimental facilities and expertise in hydraulic, geotechnical, structural, environmental, and coastal engineering complemented by state-of-the-art sophisticated computational, simulation, and communications capabilities. During FY93, WES had over 1500 employees of which 729 were highly trained engineers and scientists. This professional staff was comprised of 181 PhD's, 300 with Masters' degrees, and the remaining 248 Bache-lor's degrees. Yearly performance goals are established for both the Civil Works and Military programs. Within the Civil Works program, WES executed 99.4 percent of its FY93 civil works authority and exceeded all obligation and disbursement goals established for Military appropriations. WES executed a total Civil Works program which exceeded $106.9 million; of this total over $49.1 million was executed in 32 direct allotted R&D Programs. The remaining $57.8 million was executed in support of USACE District and Division of-fices ($54 million) and in support of non-Corps customers ($3.8 million). Major non-Corps customers included the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. During FY93, WES published 506 technical documents in-house includingl67 Technical Reports, 88 Miscellaneous Papers, 21 Contract Reports, 15 Instruction Reports, 4 Video Reports, and 211 special purpose documents. In addition to these documents, 45 Information Exchange Bulletins on technical subjects were produced. WES engineers and scientists also submitted 75 technical articles to referred journals and presented 193 papers at national and international symposia. Perhaps the most impressive demonstration of customer satisfaction is that 43 percent of WES' total obligations were accomplished with funds provided on a reimbursable basis from customers. Another clear measure of customer satisfaction is the nearly 200 citations and letters of commendation and appreciation received from sponsors during the year. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES WES has unparalleled experimental facilities and equipment, with capital assets of $630 million that include $150 million in information technology resources. The research and development missions are technically supported by extensive in-house capabilities in instrumentation and a full array of shops for engineering and construction services. The WES team includes the administrative infrastructure for all functions. Supercomputing Facility In April 1993, DoD funded the installation of a $40.3 million CRAY C90 supercomputer at WES which is operated in conjunction with the existing CRAY Y-MP system. The facility provides a computational capability of 19 billion mathematical calculations per second, with enough capacity to store ten trillion characters of on-line information. The facility is part of the DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Plan. High Speed, High-Bandwidth Communication Facilities One of the largest such communication networks in the world, it includes a 14.7-km-long fiber-optic backbone connecting 39 research facilities spread over 280 hectares and operating at FDDI speeds (100Mb/sec). The network connects over 45 LANS to high-performance computing resources located at WES and elsewhere. Directional Spectral Wave Generator This computer-controlled facility can reproduce waves of varyingperiod, amplitude, and direction in the laboratory, thereby enabling research addressing the effects of waves on coastal structures. Engineering Geology Research Facility This facility is equipped for research on engineering geology problems including site characterization of contaminated installations. It contains a sedimentation laboratory, petrography laboratory, and x-ray equipment plus supporting data acquisition instrumentation and computer hardware. Fate and Effects Facility This 2400-sq m unique combination of laboratory facilities contains state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation and monitoring equipment to study the behavior of inorganic and organic contaminants in the environment and permits determination of critical biogeochemical cycles and microbiological processes important to bioremediation of contaminated soils and sediments. Hazardous Waste Research Facility This 1000-sq m Resource Conservation and Recovery Act-permitted facility is the only one in DoD; EPA has deemed it a Center of Expertise. The variety of equip- 44-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 ment housed provides DoD and other Federal agencies with the capabilities to evaluate and develop a wide range of treatment technologies for contaminated groundwaters, soils, sediments, and, sludges. Coastal Field Research Facility The largest facility of its type in the world and located on a 72-hectare site at Duck, North Carolina, it includes a 600 m research pier and associated laboratory and data collection equipment for monitoring the coastal/ocean margin. Scientific Visualization Center (SVC) The SVC is an integral part of the high-performance computing, high-speed communications, and visualization triad. The Center provides a variety of integrated graphics, animation, and video capabilities to help analyze complex behavior of scientific phenomena associated with solving large and complex numerical problems. Special capabilities of the Center include virtual reality, direct volume visualization, and data sonification. Sediment and Water Quality Sampling Facilities As part of the multiagency Federal Interagency Sedimentation Project, special facilities for sediment and water quality sampling provide world-recognized equipment, technology, and research for future improvements. Materials Research and Forensic Facility This one-of-a-kind facility is equipped with a scanning electron microscope, x-ray diffractometer, atomic adsorption spectroscope, infrared spectroscope, rheometer, calorimeter, gas and liquid chromatograph, energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometer, light microscopes, and highresolution 4096 by 4096 pixel video color-image analysis capability uniquely adapted to the study of microscopic and macroscopic features of construction materials. Ship/Tow Simulator Linked, real-time maneuvering simulators, specially developed for navigation channel design and evaluation, can simulate both deep ports and harbors and inland waterways. The simulators are linked to complex hydrodynamic models to accurately portray currents and wave conditions that impact vessel handling. An interactive, multidisciplinary approach uses teams of specialists, including licensed pilots, for design of the optimum channel to minimize dredging and construction costs and maintain navigation safety. Aquatic Plant Field Research Facility A 50-hectare facility at Lewis-ville, Texas incorporates 53 research ponds, laboratory and office space, a greenhouse, a 30-tank mesocosm system, 18 flowingwater raceways, and additional tank systems for deepand shallow-water studies. Work includes biological, chemical, and ecological studies of aquatic plants. In 1993, a Variable Depth and Light Tank Facility was completed, consisting of eighteen 14,000-liter tanks that will be used to determine seasonal growth and development of problem aquatic plants under low light conditions. Under Construction Two significant facilities are now under construction and will be operational in FY95: the Mobility Research Center, 1400 sq m, and the world's largest centrifuge, maximum g force of 1,144,000 g-kg. LABORATORIES The diverse civil engineering and environmental quality research and development organization is a complex of six centrally managed laboratories with world-renowned expertise and facilities for solving a wide range of civil engineering and environmental quality challenges. Each laboratory adds a unique perspective and set of capabilities to the overall WES team. Hydraulics Laboratory The Hydraulics Laboratory, founded in 1929, was the original "Waterways Experiment Station", the name now being perpetuated because of the early and continuing renown the institution demonstrates in hydraulics and hydrosciences. The laboratory currently is comprised of 145 scientists, engineers, technicians and administrative staff. Together, they were responsible for executing a total program of $32 million. The WES Hydraulics Laboratory possesses broad and deep expertise in the field ofhydraulics andhydrosciences. Nationally and internationally recognized experts in the fields of riprap design, navigation engineering, pump station design, fisheries engineering, sediment transport, estuarine engineering, dredging equipment, hydrodynamics and mobile boundary channel design all reside in the WES Hydraulics Laboratory. Geotechnical Laboratory The flood control R&D work of the Hydraulics Laboratory led almost immediately to the need for soil testing and prediction of the behavior of structures built on and/ or with soil materials. Since its establishment in 1931, the Geotechnical Laboratory has grown to a strength of 225 engineers, scientists, and support personnel executing a total program of $46 million. The thrust ofgeotechnical engineering involves investigation, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of structures with, on, or in earth materials. From the establishment of the Geotechnical Laboratory, its personnel have been recognized as national and worldwide leaders in addressing problems in areas such as soil and rock mechanics, foundation behavior, engineering geology, engineering geophysics, earthquake engineering, pavement technology, mobility testing and modeling, and trafficability studies. Coastal Engineering Research Center The Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) was established by Public Law in 1963 as the direct 44-2 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION successor to the Beach Erosion Board, which also had been created by Congress in 1930. Located in the Washington, D.C., area for two decades, it functioned as an autonomous laboratory until it relocated to Vicks-burg in 1983 to become part of the Waterways Experiment Station. By FY93, a staff of approximately 150 persons was executing a total work program of $25 million. The CERC is the nation's center for engineering and scientific research and development in the coastal zone. Itis structured around balanced capabilities in prototype data collection, physical modeling, and numerical simulation to investigate processes involving waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents, and their interactions with coastal sediments and structures. Results from research in these areas are applied by CERC staff, Corps field offices, to support the execution of projects for shore and beach erosion, coastal flood and storm protection, navigation maintenance and improvement, and harbor design and modification. In addition to numerous other publications, CERC originated and periodically produces revised versions of the Shore Protection Manual, a document translated into many foreign languages and recognized worldwide as the "bible" of the coastal engineering profession. Structures Laboratory The Corps' Concrete Laboratory was transferred from Mt. Vernon, NY to become a part of WES in 1946. In 1983, WES combined the Concrete Laboratory and the Weapons Effects Laboratory into the current Structures Laboratory. The Structures Laboratory employs approximately 150 people and conducts an annual work program of approximately $40 million. Sole Federal responsibility for sampling, inspecting, and acceptance testing of portland cement and pozzolan rest with the Structures Laboratory. It is world leader in research on concrete materials and construction techniques, and the evaluation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of civil works concrete structures. Other areas of expertise include phenomenology and effects of explosions, dynamic properties of soil and rock masses, and response of structures to a wide assortment of loading conditions, including seismic, penetration, and blast effects. Environmental Laboratory The Environmental Laboratory is the acknowledged leader for conducting environmental quality research and problem solution involving theconsequences of water resources development, navigation, regulation of wetlands and inland and oceanic water quality, management of natural resources and cleanup of contaminated sediments and soils. For over 20 years, an interdisciplinary staff of 255 peer-recognized professionals, augmented with the finest network of academic and private scientists and engineers in the country, have provided the environmental quality technology necessary to further the Corps missions executing an FY93 work program of $46 million. In the mid 1970's, scientists of the Environmental Laboratory developed the landmark technical environmental criteria required by the clean water and ocean disposal acts to regulate the disposal of dredged material in terms of environmental effects. In the late 1970's, the technical criteria required to delineate wetlands in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act were developed by Environmental Laboratory scientists and adopted by all Federal agencies with wetlands responsibilities. This trend of excellence has continued today with such notable examples as development of the Chesapeake Bay mathematical water quality model to guide bay cleanup efforts, demonstration of innovative methods for dredging and treating of highly contaminated sediments, and development and demonstration of wetlands restoration technology. Information Technology Laboratory The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) was established at WES in 1986 to provide research, development, testing, evaluation, and services for the Corps of Engineers in the information mission area. ITL conducts research and development in computer science, computer- aided interdisciplinary engineering, and information technology areas and provides WES, the Corps of Engineers, Army, and DoD with a variety of advanced information technology capabilities. ITL has 220 employees and a total program in FY93 of $43 million. It manages the only DoD High Performance Computing Center for shared, stable systems; the Tri- Service CADD/GIS Technology Center; the Corps' Civil Works Guidance Update Program; one of two CEAP Regional Processing Centers providing 60 percent of the Corps' MIS data processing; one of the largest highbandwidth, high-speed data communication networks in the world; the largest library in the Corps which is also one of the finest civil engineering libraries in the nation; and the largest publishing and visual information facility in the Corps. ITL has recognized expertise in the areas of highperformance computing, application of CADD and GIS technologies for facilitymanagement, computer-aided interdisciplinary engineering and analysis, computer science applications, software engineering, large relational database systems, high-speed communications, and scientific visualization. This expertise is applied to address problems in design, analysis, and management of projects and facilities to support the various missions of the Corps of Engineers. CENTERS AND INSTITUTES Because of its unique organization and broad mission area, WES is able to apply multidisciplinary approaches to complex problems within the framework of a single overall management structure. Such approaches are especially important in critical, complicated areas such as environmental quality. Centers and Institutes have been established as part of this structure to facilitate 44-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 interdisciplinary efforts and to serve as focal points for expertise in specific technical areas. Four examples are: Wetlands Research and Technology Center (WRTC) The WRTC consolidates all areas of wetlands science and engineering, including the Corps' National Wetlands Research Program and other sponsor specific wetlands R&D, wet-lands training, interagency coordination and technology transfer. In FY 93, the WRTC hotline responded to over 1000 inquiries from Corps and non-Corps sources. The Center also facilitates the assembly of interdisciplinary teams, made up of experts from each of the WES Labs, to respond to sponsors'needs for application of state-of-the-knowledge wetlands techniques and methodologies. Center for Contaminated Sediments (CCS) The CCS was established to focus existing expertise on the problem of contaminated sediments to include identification, assessment, evaluation, and management. The activities of the center include technical and regulatory assistance, training, technology transfer, research and development, and response to general information requests. The CCS incorporates over two decades of experience from all WES elements in evaluating, managing and remediating contaminated sediments. This expertise is a direct result of research and development supporting Corps navigation dredging and mission support work related to military clean-up activities, EPA's Superfund and Assessment andRemediation ofContaminated Sediments Programs, and NOAA's Natural Resource Trustee Program. DoD CADD/GIS Technology Center This Center was established to set standards and coordinate facilities for Computer Aided Design and Drafting and Geographic Information Systems (CADD/ GIS) within the Department of Defense, promote system integration, support centralized acquisition, and provide assistance for the installation, training, operation, and maintenance of CADD/GIS systems. This includes directing specific applications development, promoting communications, promoting standards, furnishing technical advice, interfacing with professional organizations and industry, evaluating technological developments, and recommending necessary CADD/GIS policy. Civil Works Guidance Update Center The Civil Works Guidance Update Center is tasked with modernizing Corps civil works engineering guidance criteria contained in engineering manuals, regulations and guide specifications. The necessity for this effort is to comply with 1986 and 1988 Water Resource legislation that mandates cost sharing between the Government and local sponsors for water resource, protection, and navigation projects. Such cost sharing in turn requires modernizing Corps criteria for acceptance by the engineering profession and local sponsors as being cost effective with current state of the technology guidance. The Center is presently executing a program of updating 382 civil works engineering manuals, handbooks, regulations, circulars, pamphlets, and technical letters at a total cost of $25,000,000. In addition to these examples, WES contains the following similar entities: * Ecosystem Modeling Institute * DoD High Performance Computing Center * Center for Aquatic Plant Research and Technology * Computational Hydraulics Institute * Center for Cultural Site Preservation and Technology CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAMS WES engineers and scientists manage 28 civil works research and development programs and participate in 4 others. Civil works researchand development efforts at WES cover virtually the entire spectrum of technology and problem areas in the Army's civil works arena: Environmental Impact Research Program (EIRP) The EIRP supports the Corps' planning, engineering, and operations functions by developing, verifying, and demonstrating impact prediction and assessment techniques; documenting and quantifying environmental effects associated with various Corps activities; and developing and demonstrating practical engineering and resource management strategies. In FY93, the EIRP addressed eleven separate issues of immediate concern to Corps' field operating elements in terrestrial, riverine, and coastal settings. With the addition of six new sections, the Corps' Wildlife Management Manual now contains 84 sections and has been widely acclaimed and is in widespread use among a large number of Federal and state agencies. Verification of bioengineering techniques was accomplished for the lowcost control of streambank erosion, and techniques developed for the effective management of valuable historical properties subject to damage in the draw-down zones of reservoirs. Past work under the EIRP, in cooperation with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, has significantly expanded the utility and applicability of the Habitat Evaluation Procedure, and research is now being conducted to improve streamlining Incremental Analysis for even more widespread application to small projects. Wetlands Research Program (WRP) The WES has been conducting wet-lands research for more than 20 years and is considered the national leader in wetlands delineation and evaluation. Through the Wetlands Research and Technology Center, the WRP continues to provide innovative and cost-effective technical guidance documents to the Corps, Army, DoD, and other Federal and state agencies in support of wetland missions at the field level. Wetlands research findings in wetland characterization, restoration, and management have direct application for regulatory compliance and land management at military installations. Associated 44-4 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION technology transfer including "how to" guidance documents and training courses are available and already being used by DoD elements. The Cache River basin in Arkansas is a major bottomland hardwood wet-land which has been studied extensively to develop information on the critical processes that occur. Process descriptors of surface and groundwater movement, sedimentation, water quality, soils andvegetation have been completed and provide the basis for development of automated systems to characterize these systems and their changes over time, as well as predict impacts of human activities. This and other regional studies provide data for development of the hydrogeomorphic classification system for determining wetland functions and values, which has been endorsed as a component of wetlands policy by the Administration. National demonstration studies at 43 field sites contributed valuable knowledge and technical information on the design and construction of bottomland hardwood and coastal wet-lands, both for restoration of degraded wetlands and creation of new wetlands. These and other studies throughout the U.S. provide data for development of guidance documents on wetland management techniques, including plant propagation and manipulation, and low cost management techniques to maintain and enhance the physical, chemical and biological integrity of wetland ecosystems. Direct technical assistance to rapidly address wetland regulatory issues and resolve complex permitting problems is available to field offices through the Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program of the WRP. Zebra Mussel Research Program (ZMRP) The ZMRP includes development of control methods (i.e., hot water treatment, dewatering, antifoulant coatings, chemical control, etc.) and strategies to apply these methods at public facilities. It also addresses environmental effects of zebra mussel infestations as they pertain to bio-accumulation of contaminants and subsequent disposal problems, impact to natural resources, and changes in water and sediment quality. Methods are being developed to mitigate environmental effects. The ZMRP is coordinated with other Federal, regional, state, and private industry research programs through the Zebra Mussel Coordination Committee established under the Aquatic Nuisance Species Program. In FY93, the ZMRP conducted field evaluations of dewatering and exposure to cold temperatures on zebra mussels at Black Rock Lock, developed models to predict the relationship between temperature and mortality of zebra mussels, and completed one year evaluation of repellent materials. A database was developed on density and demography of zebra mussels at navigation structures and power facilities in major river systems of the central U.S. to evaluate infestation rates and patterns. Preliminary results indicate that zebra mussels were spread primarily by bargetraffic in navigable channels. Through cooperative studies with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), zebra mussels have been found on native mussels in the upper Mississippi River and the Ohio River, which indicates a likely impact to native mussel populations. Studies on bio-accumulation potential of zebra mussels indicate that zebra mussels are not likely to bioaccumulate contaminants in concentrations which would require special disposal procedures. Coastal Research Program The Coastal Research Program incorporates 6 coordinated individual programs to develop products and guidance for planning, designing and building the coastal projects that protect the nation's infrastructure against erosion, flooding and storm damage and provide for safe and effective waterways and harbors. Research focused on understanding waves, winds, water levels, tides and currents and their impact on shores and structures is critical to the effective and cost-efficient design and operation of projects. Improving prediction of project and structure performance will reduce costly over-design and repairs. New technologies will provide solutions for improving and protecting our coastal projects, thereby reducing costs and lessening impacts. In FY93, CORE-LOC, a new type of concrete armor unit, was developed and is currently being tested. Armor units are used to construct and protect coastal structures. A patent application was submitted for the economical CORE-LOC unit, which has potential for cost savings of 30 percent or more for an armor unit layer when compared to other commonly used units. PCARMOR, a computer-aided concrete armor unit breakwater design tool allowing optimization of the armor layer, was developed and released, resulting in potential cost savings to the Corps of $2-3 million per year for construction and rehabilitation of breakwaters. An enhanced version of the Automated Coastal Engineering System was released to the Corps and public. ACES is an interactive computer-based system for use in design and analysis of coastal projects and has over 500 users throughout the Corps and industry. The newest release of ACES has improved capabilities for displaying data output in graphical form. By providing state-of-theart methods and solutions in a user-friendly, easily accessed tool, ACES allows planners and designers to study multiple scenarios resulting in more reliable and cost-effective engineering of coastal projects. The Storm Induced Beach Change Model was developed to provide field engineers with a method for quantitative damage reduction evaluation, calculation of dune overwash, and improved designs for beach fillprotection projects against hurricane and storm erosion and flooding. A Sensor Insertion System was developed and installed on the Field Research Facility Pier at Duck, NC, to deploy instrumentation to measure long-shore sediment transport during storm conditions. Evaluation of the data collected will improve the Corps' ability to accurately predict long-shore transport. The SUPERTANK experiment was the most heavily instrumented laboratory coastal processes data collection project ever performed. It was a multi-agency, multi-investigator experiment conducted in the large 44-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 wave flume at Oregon State University. This experiment provided the most comprehensive cross-shore beach processes data set ever collected and will greatly impact CE and worldwide research on nearshore processes for years to come. The Field Wave Gaging Program of the Coastal Research Program provided wave data from a nationwide network of over 50 wave gages. Long-term wave conditions around the US coastline are analyzed to produce wave climate information for planning, design, and operation of coastal projects. Cooperative cost sharing agreements signed with the States of California, Hawaii, New York, Texas, Washington, Virginia, and Florida resulted in nearly $1 million in cost-shared State support for the gaging network over the last three years. Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR-II) Research Program The REMR-II research program is a multi-disciplinary, multi-lab effort managed by WES with participation by the Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (CERL) and the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). The overall objective of this 7- year, $35 million program is to identify and develop effective and affordable technology for maintaining and extending the service life of Corps civil works projects. This broad based program encompasses 6 Problem Areas: Concrete and Steel Structures, Geotechnical, Hydraulics, Coastal, Electrical and Mechanical, and Operations Management. FY93 accomplishments under this program include: (a) establishment of a relationship between temperature and alkali-silica reaction in concrete to develop a service life prediction model for concrete with reactive aggregate, (b) demonstration of advanced systems for quantifying the condition of underwater structures, (c) development of a beta version of the high velocity channel model (the model was given to four Corps districts, the Hydrologic Engineering Center, the Bureau ofReclamation,and the University of Virginia for testing), (d) development of guidance for the inspection of welded and riveted steel hydraulic structures, (e) publication and distribution of a report and video illustrating the advantages of precast concrete for rehabilitation of lock walls, and (f) dissemination of information on innovative materials and methods for levee repair to Corps Districts for use in repairing levees following the 1993 floods. MATERIALS RESEARCH PROGRAM Four integrated materials programs provided solutions to field-identified problems involving investigation, design, and construction of project features associated with water control structures. The Soils Program emphasized earth- and rock-filled dams and foundations; the Rock Program emphasized the behavior and methods of improving the response of rock masses to changing loads; the Concrete Program emphasized the properties and behavior of concrete materials and structures; and the Structural Engineering Program emphasized development of design and analysis techniques as well as computer-aided computational tools. The overall thrust of these programs is to produce project features in a more economical manner while ensuring that public safety is maintained on Corps projects. Selected FY93 accomplishments include: Soils: The work performed on testing of soils containing large particles eliminated uncertainties in testing and compaction control of materials used in construction of earth- and rock-filled dams. The study results were reported in WES Technical Reports, refereed papers, and at workshops and Corps-sponsored PROSPECT courses. The work of the Principal Investigator and his associates was recognized by the Department of the Army Research and Development Award. Rock: A precise kinematic theory that describes the behavior of discontinuous materials was developed. Called Dynamic Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (Dynamic DDA), the theory employs constitutive relationships that satisfy both static and dynamic equilibrium. Dynamic DDA is a significant development with application to a wide variety of engineering problems. Programming of the 2-D version was completed, and technology transfer workshops were held with over 35 geotechnical engineers from the Corps, Bureau of Mines, and Bureau of Reclamation attending. Additionally, the Rock Program produced a series of 28 reportson earthquake hazard evaluations. Concrete: Roller-compacted concrete (RCC) is an economical material for constructing dams and other massive structures. However, designers have generally recognized that it is potentially susceptible to damage caused by weathering cycles. Research led to the successful development of procedures for entraining and controlling protective air-void systems in RCC that render it much more durable in severe environments. Technology from this research was used by the Walla Walla District during construction of the Zintel Canyon Dam in Washington. Structural Engineering: A nonlinear incremental analysis procedure for mass concrete was developed. This new procedure was used by the Ohio River Division for the Olmsted Locks and Dam, resulting in cost savings of $1 million in design and analysis. Development continued on computer design tools that have been used on over 2,500 structures/projects with identified savings of several million dollars since 1980. Navigation Hydraulics Program The Navigation Hydraulics Program has been instrumental in developing design guidance for deep-draft and shallow-draft projects which is least disruptive to the environment. This has included design guidance in the form of Engineering Manuals for both deep- and shallowdraft waterways and transferring past and on-going technology through Corps training courses and symposiums. The shallow-draft manual was widely received by the engineering community and has been translated into several foreign languages and the guidance used in other countries for their waterway development. The Program 44-6 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION was deeply involved in early development of the WES ship/tow simulator which is a state-of-the-art design tool for waterway development. During FY93, first phase of design guidance development for small-craft coastal port design was completed. Phase 1 involved development of existing design practices and appropriate vessels to use in future research on such port design. The results of this research were presented in various technical reports and provided input to Phase 2, which focuses on defining navigation characteristics of small craft that use coastal ports. Research continued on development of design parameters for bendway weirs. Bendway weirs are an innovative form of river training structure initially developed on site specific studies. This research is focused on development of generally applicable design parameters for a broader application of bendway weirs on other navigation channels. Research also continued on necessary channel protection required due to the forces imposed on bank protection. This research is directed toward quantifying the forces shallow-draft vessels impose on river banks and the size of the material required to resist those forces. WES has been involved in using Global Positioning System methods for recording vessel location on a real-time basis. To the present, this procedure has been used for two purposes: to record definitive maneuvers of vessels and to determine navigation study needs. Differential methods have been used to record maneuvers of small boats such as Gulf Coast shrimp boats (Bayou Labatre, AL) and New England lobster boats (Saugus, MA). These maneuvering data are used for development and validation of numerical and physical models of small craft. Research to additionally enhance the ship/tow simulator was also continued. This research will provide more accurate numerical definition of stream flow for various simulator studies. Flood Control Structures R&D Program The Flood Control Structures Program is directed at developing new or improved guidance for cost effective design, construction, rehabilitation, operation, and maintenance of flood control structures. This guidance results in better projects and significantly reduces the time required for engineers in District offices to develop the design or plan for many operational and maintenance activities. Several design guidance publications including a new chapter in EM 1110-2-1601 on riprap design for streambank protection have been produced by this program. Improvement of Operations and ManagementTechniques (IOMT) This multi-laboratory, multi-disciplinary program managed by WES has participating researchers from CERL, the Institute for Water Resources (IWR), and CRREL. The program is focused on providing measurable means for reducing costs and increasing efficiency in operations and maintenance management procedures at all levels of the Corps' massive O&M program. Representative products provided to the Corps O&M community include Decision Support Software for O&M budget analysis, a budget scenario generator and comparison tool that has completely revamped O&M prebudget analysis and reduced computational costs; a multiregression statistical procedure for analysis of existing stream gauge records as a check for possible gauge elimination and resulting cost savings; and guidance for integration of automation upgrades at flood control,navigation, and hydropower projects. Aquatic Plant Control Research Program (APCRP) The APCRP is the nation's leader in aquatic plant research and primarily handles problem aquatic plant infestations of major economic significance in navigable waters. The APCRP is designed to provide environmentally compatible, cost effective methods for identification, assessment, and management of these aquatic plant problems. WES researchers have been successful in reducing the populations of two major emergent problem species, alligatorweed and waterhya-cinth. Currently, major research efforts are focused on developing technology to manage two submersed problem aquatic plants, hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil. In FY93, WES and the Agriculture Research Service of the USDA continued their cooperative efforts in the use of biological agents for the long-term management of hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil, including domestic and foreign searches for biological agents and the testing, quarantine, release, and establishment of approved biocontrol agents. The APCRP continued to develop improved techniques for the use of aquatic herbicides and plant growth regulators in a more environmentally compatible manner. These techniques include the development of innovative aquatic herbicide application techniques and controlled-release herbicide carriers. In addition, WES continued a cooperative relationship with the chemical industry and EPA in aquatic herbicide registration and labeling by providing the EPA with research data acquired through APCRP. User-friendly simulation modeling capabilities for understanding aquatic plants and their role in the aquatic environment continued to be developed as aids in the planning and decision making process. Natural Resources Research Program (NRRP) NRRP provides natural resource managers and planners with state-of-the-art technology for managing natural resources and recreation facilities at Corps projects. Using WES expertise in the technical fields of recreation, agronomy, forestry, sociology, landscape architecture, and related biological sciences, NRRP develops research products that allow resource managers to effectively address natural resource and recreation issues. Direct technical assistance is provided through the Natural Resources Technical Support (NRTS) Program. This program provides one-on-one, rapid technical service in solving natural resources or recreation problems at Corps projects. Recent NRRP accomplishments include developing and testing an automated system for issuing Corps 44-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 campgrounduse permits. This system, which has been implemented Corps-wide, provides cost-savings of more than $1 million annually by eliminating 19 accountable steps in issuing campground use permits. In addition, NRRP developed a procedure to effectively manage water- based recreation use at Corps reservoirs. Presently, this procedure is being tested and refined at Corps projects experiencing water-based problems. In FY 1993 over 60 instances of NRTS direct technical assistance were provided to Corps projects. Types of NRTS technical assistance included carrying capacity, wildlife management, reservoir pool fluctuation impacts, creating and managing fisheries and waterfowl habitat, and visitor attendance and profile calculations. Water Quality Research Program (WQRP) The WQRP involves the research of water quality problems on all Corps inland reservoir and waterway projects. The WQRP provides cost-effective methods and guidance for solving problems related to project water quality. In FY93, WQRP continued research efforts in developing relationships to describe and understand the fundamental processes affecting water quality and the biotic structure of aquatic systems, particularly as they relate to assessment and management issues. In addition, the program continued the development of assessment capabilities for managing CE water resource projects. Also in FY93, WES continued to provide rapid direct technical assistance to CE projects and the nation through the Water Operations Technical Support (WOTS) Program. The WOTS Program provides for the effective transfer of technology and assistance in the implementation of technology developed by WQRP and the Zebra Mussel Research Program. Under WOTS, WES researchers responded to over 200 direct technical assistance and one-stop service requests from CE projects for solving water quality environmental problems. Sea Turtle Research Program In the early 1980s the Corps of Engineers realized that sea turtles were being taken during normal hopper dredging operations along the southeast Atlantic coast of the U.S. Through discussions and consultations with National Marine Fisheries Service and other experts on sea turtle behavior, WES developed a program of research activities designed to reduce the impacts of hopper dredges on sea turtles at dredging projects. The coordinated program is divided into two inter-related components: abiological approach and an engineering approach. The biological approach employs physical observations, censuring and animal counts, and statistical representations of data to establish meaningful indices of turtle populations and behavioral traits. The engineering approach makes use of physical model studies, engineering and structural analysis, and field demonstrations to devise hardware modifications that make dredging operations safer for resident sea turtles. During FY93, accomplishments included: Biological Approach: The biological approach included relative abundance studies to determine when sea turtles are absent or least abundant at specific ship channels maintained by hopper dredge. This task was accomplished through trawling a channel in a set pattern with standardized trawling equipment over a specified time period. The numbers of animals of various species captured per unit trawl time per unit channel area were statistically analyzed. Other behavioral studies were designed to gain fundamental understanding of patterns and trends of sea turtles as they occupy navigation channels. These studies answered questions pertaining to time-dependent location of sea turtles in the water column and on the bottom, whether they are feeding or resting, and their sensitivity to changing environmental conditions. Captured turtles were tagged with satellite telemetry devices to document turtle movement in the vicinity of the channels through radio tracking and observation by scientists in boats. Engineering Approach: The engineering approach included bio-acoustic studies to determine acoustic thresholds, frequency range, and auditory behavior of sea turtles and manatees (which may be in the area). Acoustic dispersal studies were performed to develop a safe technique for dispersing sea turtles from the vicinity of dredge dragheads by seismic air guns. A turtle rigid deflector draghead and a chain deflector draghead were developed and field tested for the Corps' California-style hopper dredge draghead. Field tests with the hopper dredge McFar-land included placement of 350 mock (prototype size and density) sea turtles on the ocean bottom, and video documenting the effectiveness of the deflectors. The rigid deflector draghead effectively excludes sea turtles, dredging production is not adversely impacted, air guns alert sea turtles, and dredging windows apparently can be widened. Dredging Research Program (DRP) The DRP is a coordinated research effort in response to rising costs for performing dredging to maintain thenation's waterway infrastructure. The objective of the DRP is to save federal dredging funds by making the operational and managerial aspects of dredging projects more efficient and effective, while at the same time enhancing environmental responsiveness of the Corps. The program is divided into 5 technical areas: a)Dredged Material Placed in Open Water; b) Material Properties Related to Navigation and Dredging; c) Dredge Plant Equipment and System Processes; d) Vessel Positioning, Survey Controls, and Dredge Monitoring Systems; and e) Management of Dredging Projects. These technical areas produce a suite of products that include hardware and equipment for performing waterway dredging and related activities more efficiently; software and instrumentation for better under-standing of long-term fate and dynamics of disposed dredged material; and design guidance for beach restoration with dredged material berms, bypass system design and placement, and open water disposal site planning, design, and management. New and innovative instrumentation and equipment were developed to aid in management decisions regard- 44-8 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION ing disposal of sediments near sensitive regions, resuspension and transport from designated open water disposal sites, and for calibration of numerical simulation models describing the short- and long-term fate of disposed sediments. Plume Measurement System is an instrument for measuring fluid velocities and suspended sediment concentrations of material at dredging or disposal sites. The Acoustic Resuspension Measurement System is an instrument for measuring sediment resuspension and movement in the water column at existing and proposed dredged material open water disposal sites, and capped sites for contaminated disposal. An acoustic impedance method of subbottom profiling was developed to accurately measure the thickness of different sediment layers in the subbottom. A system using Global Positioning System technology was developed for hydrographic surveying and dredging to provide real-time horizontal and vertical positions with accuracies better than 10 cm. A Silent Inspector (SI) was developed to collect accurate, unbiased information during hopper dredging operations and produce standard data summary reports regarding loading, travel time and distance, off-loading, and return to dredging site. The SI also can be used to ensure environmental compliance. Effective dredged material open water disposal site management guidance was developed to ensure the longterm availability of placement sites and to avoid costs of designating alternate sites. This comprehensive guidance for preparing an effective site-specific management plan includes monitoring rate and placement of sediments,biological resource determination, and sediment testing and evaluation. Specific engineering guidance for performing open water capping operations also were produced. Products from the DRP were applied to many Corps dredging projects during FY93. As an example, predictive tools and design guidance from several areas of the DRP were used to execute a fast-track study for New York District on the design and placement of a sand cap to isolate 380,000 cu m of dioxin-contaminated sediment placed in the Mud Dump ocean disposal site. Study results were accepted by EPA and state resource agencies, and the project was successfully executed, saving the local sponsor approximately $1 million and the District approximately $2 million. Long-Term Effects of Dredging Program (LEDO) The LEDO Program is designed to provide new or improved technology to predict long-term environmental impacts and to address methods of managing contaminated sediments. The technology will allow the Corps to meet its dredging and environmental constraints in a manner that is technically sound while reducing or eliminating unneeded constraints. In 1993, the program developed a marine worm chronic/ sublethal bioassay, a predictive protocol (freshwater) for evaluation of leachate from confined disposal facilities and guidance on non-polar organics (PAils) contaminants in sediment and suspended material. These have direct application in the Corps regulatory evaluation of dredged material as prescribed in the EPA/Corps Testing Manuals for disposal in both ocean and inland waters. In addition, the program developed technical guidelines on using a national bioaccumulation data base and has initiated an electronic bulletin board to make it available to a broad audience. As designed the program continues to have direct programmatic input to the development of the EPA/Corps Testing Manuals for dredged material. Dredging Operations Technical Support (DOTS) Program The DOTS Program provides direct environmental and engineering technical support to the Corps' Operations & Maintenance (O&M) dredging elements. The program's field assistance and technology transfer activities have supported diverse field needs for years and have directly benefitted the Corps' dredging mission. In FY93, DOTS responded to 161 requests from 33 Corps elements (Divisions/Districts) for technical assistance dealing in almost allenvironmental and engineering aspects of dredging and dredged material disposal. Major areas of assistance included management ofhighly contaminated sediments, application of risk assessment methods, endangered species issues, application of longterm management strategies for dredged material disposal, and application of new technologies in materials modeling, sediment profiling, dredge positioning, materials movement monitoring, etc. The program also played a lead role in developing the Corps-EPATechnical Framework for Dredged Material Management. This framework provides a consistent "road map" for evaluating the environmental acceptability of dredged material management alternatives. DOTS organized the joint Corps/ EPA task force to develop analytical procedures and a decision making framework for disposal of dioxin contaminated dredged material. Because of DOTS, the Corps now has QA/QC guidance for dredged material bioassays as prescribed in both the Clean Water Act and the Ocean Dumping Act implementation manuals. In addition the concept of thin layer disposal of dredged material is now acceptable in many situations and guidance is available for its use in both subtidal and marsh habitat circumstances. Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program Authorized by the 1988 Water Resources Act, the CPAR Program permits cost-shared cooperative research and development between Corps laboratories and the construction industry. The purpose of the program is to help the domestic construction industry improve productivity and regain its competitive edge nationally and internationally. WES is a major participant in this vital program with more than half of the total research being conducted by WES and its industry partners. Five CPAR projects were completed by WES and its industry partners during Fiscal Year 1993. (a)The project on High-Performance Blended Cements found that 44-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTMVITIES FOR FY 1993 Pyrament cement produces concretes with excellent sulfate resistance, excellent resistance to chloride permeability, excellent freezing and thawing durability, and rapid strength gain even at low temperatures. These properties make Pyrament cement an excellent choice for building parking structures and bridges, and for the repair and rehab of facilities where down time is costly. Over $10 million in savings have been reported from the use of this material for the rehab of two airfields. (b) The project on Concrete Quality Control by Heat Signatureresulted in a computer-aided system for concrete quality control which evaluates in-place concrete rapidly and provides more quality information than available by other systems. This system allows users to make timely and rational decisions regarding form and reshore removal scheduling, receive early warning on low quality concrete, and improve the overall quality of construction. The system is now commercially available from Digital Site Systems, Inc. (c) An improved specification for hot-applied sealants was developed under the Sealing and Resealing of Joints in Concrete Pavements project. A new sealant was also developed to meet the improved specification. The specification is expected to result in a longer service life (3 to 5 years longer) for installed joint sealants which will result in a 10 to 20 percent savings on maintenance costs. (d) The project Stabilization of High Plasticity Clay Soils Using Discrete Fibers resulted in design guidance for use of the fibers for unpaved roads. Test showed that the use of discrete fibers to stabilize clay soils can result in an increase in vehicle coverages to failure of at least 30 percent. (e) The Interference Checking of Construction Designs project resulted in software which permits multidisciplinary interferences to be detected and corrected during the design process rather than the construction phase. Use of this software will reduce the need for expensive change orders and construction delays. The software is commercially available from Inter-graph Corporation. The six new WES CPAR projects approved during FY93 were: a new vibrator system for concrete consolidation, a new system for concrete bridge deck repair, a new radar system for diagnosing concrete, dredged material containment systems using geotextiles, prediction of bearing capacity of vibratory installed piles, and a ballistic soil nailing system. Risk Analysis for Water Resource Investments WES provided a range of research engineering input to this program, which is managed by IWR. The objective of the program the development and application of risk analysis techniques to a variety of Corps civil works issues and problems in water resource planning, engineering, design, operations, and project management. Along with increases in budget constraints and local cost sharing, the concern for cost effective performance and reliability has raised the Corps need to consider risk and uncertainty. WES work covers reliability and risk applications in the areas of Major Rehabilitation (reliability assessment of navigation structures including pile founded and grayity structures, and degradation rates for engineeringreliability assessment) and Flood Control (determination of stage-discharge relationships, and stability evaluation of levees). In these two areas, Corps Districts are required to justify civil works project funding by providing a report that demonstrates a need for improvement in reliability or efficiency. Districts have cited a lack of criteria for assessing the reliability of structural performance in these two areas; therefore, WES's work units develop such procedures and methods together with examples and case studies to enhance their usefulness. During FY93, WES developed and refined guidance and procedures for conducting required risk-based benefit- cost analysis. For Major Rehabilitation, methods were developed and refined to quantify initial and future reliabilities of timber pile founded structures and nonanchored gravity structures. Computer procedures were developed to apply this guidance to reliability assessment and quantification of structural degradation rates. Surveys were conducted and analyzed to determine degradation rates on vertically-framed miter gates and concrete lock walls. For Flood Control, methods were developed and refined to quantify the stage-damage relationship. Initial analysis of levee stability was performed. WES conducted and/or participated in seven training sessions on Major Rehabilitation for Navigation or Hydropower Structures and five training sessions on Flood Damage Reduction for Corps personnel. Using the procedures and guidance developed and refined in this program, the following Corps Districts have prepared Major Rehabilitation funding reports: St. Louis on Lock & Dam 25 (funded in FY94) and Lock & Dam 24, Galveston on Brazos River sheetpile guidewalls (funded in FY94), Portland on Bonneville Power Plant (funded in FY94), Chicago on Burns Harbor, Savannah on Hartwell and Thurman Power Plants, Mobile on Woodruff Power Plant, and Rock Island on Lock & Dam 14. WES participated in studies relating to preparation of these reports for St. Louis, Galves-ton, and Chicago districts. Additionally in FY93, WES participated in the Upper Mississippi River- Illinois Waterway Navigation Study, which evaluated the effect of corrosion and fatigue on the reliability of steel structures. INTERDISCIPLINARY/LARGE SCALE STUDIES Increasingly, WES expertise and products developed in R&D programs are being requested in comprehensive, integrated packages that address broad or critical areas of concern. Examples of such efforts during FY93 includethe following: New York Bight Hydro-Environmental Study Section 728 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act authorized a hydro-environmental study of the New York Bight. This five-year effort was completed in FY93. The objective of the study was to determine the feasibility and specifications for a hydro-environmental modeling, monitoring, and information system of the Bight for the 44-10 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION purpose of assessing natural and man-made impacts to the Bight. The investigations involved many component Tasks and resulted in over ten reports and technology transfer of a suite of models (hydrodynamic, water quality, particle tracking, oil spill, contaminant screening) and a Geographical Information System and Relational Data Base. Success of the Bight study generated interest in extending the Bight technology to the Harbor. The new study has been initiated and is focused on development of validated model technology to meet anticipated Corps need of a suite of high-resolution models/tools for supporting future project investigations identified in the District's Dredged Material Management Plan Study. These needs include modifications to existing models to coarsely represent the estuary system and the development ofhigh-resolution hydrodynamic, storm surge, water quality, contaminant and sediment transport models of the harbor system. A second objective in the new study is to coordinate Corps modeling needs with those of EPA-Region II with the goal of developing Corps model technology sufficient to meet EPA requirements regarding wasteload allocation, superfund clean-up, and toxics reduction and remediation. Hence, the high-resolution models will be system wide, including portions of Long Island Sound, the Bight Apex, and the entire NY Harbor Estuary system. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels Texas Projects This project,jointly sponsored by the Ports of Houston, Galveston and the U.S. Army Engineer District, Galveston, Texas, has been closely coordinated with all interested parties. To this end, an Interagency Coordination Team (ICT) was established by the Galveston District to ensure that this large scale navigation channel deepening project addressed pertinent engineering and environmental concerns. WES researchers have used complex two and three dimensional hydrodynamic models to provide guidance on channel design through the WES Ship Simulator and input to complex environmental models developed by Texas A&M and Old Dominion Universities. The WES 3- D hydrodynamic code, RMA10-WES, has been used to simulate 24 years of real time, representing 30 different scenarios requested by the ICT. The simulations, performed on site at the WES Supercomputing Center, produced 500 gigabytes of output representing water elevations, velocities and salinityconcentrations at thousands of points throughout Gal-veston Bay. These data were used to evaluate project impacts on the vital oyster industry and served as the basis for designing mitigation features. Olmsted Lock and Dam Design This project, estimated to cost $1.2 billion, is the Corps of Engi-neers' largest Civil Works Design and Construction project and is being managed by the U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville, Kentucky. Located on the Ohio River 25 miles downstream from Paducah, Kentucky, it consists of two 110 by 1200 foot navigation locks, a 2200 foot wide navigable pass regulatory section, with a navigation pool controlled by 220 wicket gates and a fixed weir. WES expertise in the fields of lock design, earthquake engineering, geotechnical engineering, sediment transport, structural engineering, concrete design and high speed computing have all contributed to this endeavor. Unique features and engineering challenges include the need for an innovative wicket gate design, due to large downstream water surface fluctuations and the fact that the structures will be built in an active earthquake zone. Ground motions due to various earthquake intensities were determined to use in the design of all affected components of the project. Thermo-stress studies were performed to determine the effect of different concrete mixes and construction techniques on the residual stress of mass concrete in the navigation lock. Physical model studies are being used to study navigation conditions at the structure and to determine loads and vibration tendencies of the wicket gate. A finite element analysis of the wicket gate is being developed to assist in the structural design of the gate. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Model Study Chesapeake Bay is our nation's largest and most productive estuary. The Bay is plagued with problems (bottom-water anoxia, decline in fisheries, and loss of submerged aquatic vegetation) that accompany agricultural and industrial development and population growth along its shores and headwaters. WES formed a multilab team to develop fully three-dimensional hydrodynamic and eutrophication models of the Bay and modeling strategy for providing quantitative information to Federal and State management decision makers for use in Bay cleanup. This work was jointly funded by the Baltimore District and EPA, and was conducted under the auspices of the Chesapeake Bay Program and an expert Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee. The in-depth review contributed greatly to the success of the study and acceptance of study products. The achievements of the Bay study influenced additional joint-agencysupport of a second study focusing on the Bay tributaries. This effort will include detailed studies of aquatic vegetation and important living resources. Cooperative Research with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The WES, in conjunction with the EPA, has undertaken development of spatially varying two dimensional watershed models. These models will take full advantage of emerging technologies such as NEXRAD radar precipitation data and couple the watershed runoff response to groundwater aquifer recharge. In addition, the fate and transport of contaminants such as pesticides and their effect on surface and groundwater resources will be determined. Together, these models will provide 44-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 for the management and mitigation of pollutants in the environment. Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterways Navigation Study (UMR-IWS) The infrastructure of the inland navigation system is currently deteriorating due to aging of the sys-tem's structures. Many of these structures have exceeded their design life and/or capacity, and major maintenance work is necessary to keep them operational. Many of these facilities are often operating at full capacity and cannot meet the barge traffic demands of the future. Since most of the structures on the Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers were built at the same time, the situation is compounded for Corps Districts in this region. Therefore, this study is underway to assess the investment needs for navigation projects on the UMR-IWS to reliably meet the barge traffic demands for the first half of the next century. In FY93, WES was tasked by the engineering work group for the UMR-IWS to develop and implement procedures to model the effects of corro-sion and fatigue over time for the reliability analysis of steel structures used in the navigation system. A report and accompanying computer procedures detailed the reliability analysis procedures, and case studies using the vertically-framed miter gates at Lock & Dam 8 and 24 demonstrated the analysis procedures. This engineering reliability information will be utilized to prepare the required risk-based benefit-cost analysis for justifying civil works project funding on the thirty-seven lock and dams structures in the system. This justification will establish a future investment strategy for Corps expenditures on the Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers. Also, for this study, WES experts in structural design, reliability analysis, concrete technology, and navigation are working on a reliability model for deterioration of concrete lock walls due to freeze-thaw and abrasion. Los Angeles County Drainage Area (LACDA) WES is investigating the hydraulic aspects of existing high speed flood control channels in Los Angeles, California. This is being undertaken as a cost-shared effort between the County of Los Angeles, California and the U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles. Efforts are focused on design modifications to existing bridges, such as pier extensions, changes to the channel invert and identification and remediation of reaches where unstable flow conditions exist. WES studies have recommended modifications to existing bridges and channels that will allow the design flow to pass and save many of the bridges from complete replacement. The WES-recommended changes are much less expensive than complete bridge replacement, and the Los Angeles District estimates that savings resulting from this study will be in excess of $100 million. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors Model Enhancement Program In response to the expansion of oceanborne world commerce, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, are conducting planning studies for harbor development in coordination with Los Angeles District to accommodate master plan development through the year 2020. The Corps of Engineers will be responsible for providing navigation channels withincreased depth and for determining effects of the harbor improvements on water quality. A Model Enhancement Program was developed to significantly upgrade the Corps'capacity to determine these effects based on state-of-the-art field data and modeling technology. All elements of the Coastal Engineering Research Center and parts of the Environmental Laboratory were involved in this effort. The Model Enhancement Program includes two major portions. The first was concerned with the action of longperiod waves on the harbors. Very little is known about the origin and frequency of occurrence of these waves, but their existence is evident in producing extremely adverse ship loading/unloading conditions at various berths throughout the harbors. This portion of the enhancement program provided prototype wave data, a moored ship motion model, and an upgraded testing capability for the existing WES physical model of Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbors. The second major part of the enhancement program provided an improved three-dimensional tidal circulation model to couple hydraulics and water quality variables. All major elements of the enhancement program have produced significant improvements in modeling capability. A large data base is available for determining frequency of occurrence of long-period waves. A moored ship motion model was calibrated with field data. The physical model now has the capability to pro-duce longperiod wave spectra. A three-dimensional numerical model of tidal circulation and water quality has been completed and applied. Results of the Model Enhancement Program have provided a significantly improved capability to evaluate the effect of harbor improvement plans on circulation, water quality, harbor resonance, and ship mooring conditions. 44-12 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS The U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) is a world class laboratory whose primary technologies relate to accurate and graphic description of the. earth's surface for both military and non-military applications. With new importance placed on construction efficiency and the regulation, recovery, sustenance, and enhancement of the earth's life-support systems, it has become increasingly urgent to develop effective tools for surveying and mapping, and for environmental monitoring and control. To meet this challenge, TEC scientists and engineers have developed faster, and more accurate and cost-effective ways to use remote sensing technologies to describe and characterize the surface of the earth. The tools and technology that TEC provided for the rapid deployment and precise management of forces in Desert Shield and Desert Storm can now be applied to environmental restoration and management. The ultimate success of the nation and the globe to creatively meet the environmental challenges of tomorrow could well depend on the successful adaptation of technologies that TEC has developed, largely for military purposes, to existing and new civil program applications. TEC's technologies provide the nation with a "visual stethoscope" with which to diagnose and focus corrective action in assessing, maintaining, and enhancing our nation's environmental health. The technologies for which TEC is responsible are integrating technologies, bringing together the macroscopic view from air and space and the microscopic view of the scientist on the ground. These integrating visualization, spectral, and spatial data research capabilities can provide the nation with very powerful tools for use in environmental control and remediation, both for domestic needs and for our role in global environmental leadership. The extensive development of remote sensing technologies for use in construction, environmental rehabilitation, and resource management will give the nation the research and operational tools that it needs to both do a better and more complete job than would otherwise be possible, as well as to do that job more rapidly, more accurately, and at the lowest possible cost. The ability of TEC to cost-effectively participate in the Corps Civil Works Program is enhanced by its extensive on going efforts in the development of remote sensing technologies for both military and non-military applications. These efforts include multispectral image (MSI) and hyperspectral image (HSI) analysis, change detection, automated image registration techniques, development of advanced image compression techniques, MSI/HSI enhanced software development, development of one of the world's finest and most extensive spectral signature data bases, computer-assisted stereo editing, photogrammetric interfaces with computer vision, research in HSI data processing and classification using neural networks, development of lap-top terrain analysis systems with Global Positioning System (GPS) capability, terrain visualization, and extensive modeling and simulation. TEC, currently developing one of the world's most complete spectral signature data bases, along with the techniques and tools to use it, offers remote sensing exploitation technologies that could form an essential part of a new national approach to environmental management and control. These technologies include advanced and more efficient methods of surveying and mapping, as well as advanced methods of identifying problems and trends on the earth's surface. These tools can already accurately characterize many surface conditions, including certain types and conditions of vegetation and soils. With further development, these tools could be greatly enhanced to provide rapid and accurate determination of change in the biosphere for a wide and yet-to-be determined range of applications, to indicate both the location of point and non-point pollution sources as well as to warn of impending negative or positive environmental change. TEC looks forward to helping the nation increase its survey and mapping capability, improve its construction and transportation efficiency, and develop efficient environmental and resource management tools by adapting remote sensing technologies for civil program use. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY93 During FY93, TEC concentrated on developing new applications of rapidly advancing technology in the surveying engineering and mapping sciences, as well as to applying digital image processing to the wetland monitoring needs of the Corps districts. Considerable effort was devoted to transferring technology through field demonstrations, technical papers and reports, criteria documentation and formal classroom training. Technologies especially relevant to the Corps of Engineers include the Global Positioning System (GPS), Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and photogrammetry. 45-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Global Positioning System (GPS) The GPS is a satellite navigation, timing and ranging system developed by Department of Defense (DOD). Highly efficient measurements of position can be made with GPS using several techniques, with accuracies ranging from meters to millimeters. One of TEC's major endeavors was the development of the real-time centimeter GPS On-The-Fly (OTF) positioning system. The operational prototype of this project was completed in 1993, and demonstrations of the system, started in August of 1993, have all been outstandingly successful. The OTF prototype system provides real-time positions accurate to the centimeter level in all three dimensions. The system has a range of 20 kmn, but preliminary research has shown that this range can be extended to 40- 60 km. This is the first system in the world to be publicly demonstrated that can provide this type of accuracy using GPS carrier phase measurements that is packaged in a robust, reliable system. TEC received recognition from the Institute of Navigation for efforts in this area. The physical prototype is the crowning product of a six year research effort funded under the USACE Dredging Research Program. Although the initial group targeted to benefit from the OTF technlmology is the Corps' hydrographic surveyors and the U.S. dredging industry, it is anticipated that this technology will revolutionize the face of surveying and engineering. The development of several applications of this technology are already underway. Examples are the Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) effort with Caterpillar, research to determine tides in real time, and work with autonomous land vehicles. Several agencies and representatives from industry have approached TEC about its robust OTF centimeter system. TEC has successfully aided thie Corps districts and divisions in the implementation of Differential GPS (DGPS) to the extent that they have great confidence in and call frequently upon the expertise of TEC. Assistance ranges from a variety of technical questions and training to helping in the establishment of regional and national implementation plans. A great deal of time, effort and funds have been saved in this manner. A premier example of how TEC has served the Corps is the support lent to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division (LMVD) for the establishment of a DGPS system along the Mississippi River. Experiments run by TEC, the United States Coast Guard (USCG), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) illustrated how the USCG radio beacon system could be used by the USACE for dredging contract payment surveys. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) should be signed in early 1994 to combine DGPS systems and run the joint radio beacon system up the inland rivers, saving the government, industry and taxpayers large amounts of money. Another large effort that TEC has recently embarked upon reflects upon TEC's reputation as a leader in GPS and surveying expertise. The Department of Transportation (DOT) approached TEC to be the GPS expert on a large study being conducted on augmented GPS systems. Initially, the study was to focus on the Intelligent Vehicle Highway System (IVHS) but the effort has been expanded beyond the IVHS. The goal of the study is to identify the type of augmented DGPS system that can be implemented on a national level to supply marine, land and aviation users with accurate positioning and navigational information. This study is funded by DOD and DOT, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), as well as representatives of the railroad industry. The progress of this effort will be subject to the review of the DOD/DOT Joint Task Force, as well as others. This study is quite high profile and could significantly impact future DGPS efforts for both federal and private users. The additional work that TEC conducts in its interface with the larger surveying community has aided tremendously in posturing TEC to be able to conduct work at this level. TEC has representatives working with the Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee (FGCS) and has been instrumental in the development of standards for GPS within ithe larger federal community. Currently, a TEC member is the Chair of the Instrument Working Group and a member of the Fixed Reference Station Working Group of the FGCS. Over this past year, a TEC member has Chaired the Working Group that developed the recommendations for the new format for carrier phase DGPS to the Radio Teclmhnical Commission on Maritime Services. TEC also has a representative on a working group formed for GPS and Photogrammetry. Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) DX-90 Data Exchange Study TEC engineers, in coordination with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), are in the midst of a study of the DX-90 data format as a media of exchange between the Corps and NOAA. NOAA has requested that the Corps provide their hydrographic data in DX-90 format to enable more efficient and accurate use in their charting process. DX- 90 was developed primarily by NOAA and has been adopted by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO). A pilot project is currently underway at TEC to translate Baltimore District survey data into DX-90 format for transfer to NOAA. 45-2 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER Channel Creation Software TEC computer scientists have produced a software package for Corps-wide distribution that creates threedimensional CADD models of channels which can be used for project design and dredged material volume calculation. With this program users can quickly and easily create channels, turning basins, and wideners from basic design criteria. This software provides a important link in the Corps effort to begin using TINs for dredged material volume calculations. Surveying Engineering Vertical Conversion Software TEC computer scientists have produced a software package for Corps-wide distribution that calculates the orthometric heights between the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29) and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). This software, program CORPSVER, is based on the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) VERTCON. CORPSVER will allow a user to calculate height differences using state plane coordinates systems, Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates, and geographical coordinates. A modified software package is under development that will combine CORPSVER with the Corps horizontal datum conversion program CORPSCON. This new software will allow a user to convert between both vertical and horizontal datums within the same program. Hydrographic Quality Software TEC computer scientists have produced a software package for Corps-wide distribution that provides a consistency check for hydrographic surveys. This software, program XCHK (Cross Check), determines the quality of the survey by calculating the X-Y intersection and the difference in depths (Z values) of the overlapping cross-section and profile (longitude) lines. XCHK performs an assessment of the survey through the computation of several statistical criterion. These criterion are defined in the USACE Hydrographic Survey Engineer Manual, EM-i 110-2- 1003. GPS Water Levels USATEC scientists and engineers are conducting research to find practical solutions for the measurement of useful gravity based heights such as water flow from precise, expedient Global Positioning System (GPS) heights based on a model coordinate system. Tests conducted in August 1993 with Norfolk District confirmed the precision of this idea with a high degree of success. Another part of this research involves the Canadian Hydrographic Service and the University of New Brunswick. One TEC engineer has pursued this water level challenge as his Masters Thesis for Long-Term Training. The approach to this facet of the project is to install GPS equipment in conjunction with motion sensing equipment inside a buoy. The buoy can then be used to establish a construction datum for any dredging project. This buoy is important because the height differences between the gravity based and GPS systems are directly measured; not modelled. Standardized Hydrographic Survey System The goals of this project are being pursued through the Construction Productivity Advancement Research Program (CPAR) as a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRDA) between the US Army Topographic Engineering Center and Coastal Oceanographics Incorporated. This action originated from procurement problems associated with a Corpswide buy of the Standardized Hydrographic Survey System. The alternatives to the Corps-wide buy were guide specifications and in-house software development. The CPAR-CRDA provides USACE hydrographic standards and establishes a value engineering relationship with the Partner in pursuit of the project goals. Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) Global Positioning System Controlled Photogrammetry (GCP) This cooperative effort between the Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) and Photo Science Inc. proved the feasibility and practicability of using a Global Positioning System Control-based Photogrammetry (GCP) system for mapping of civil activities with greatly increased efficiency and reduced cost. This was accomplished with an airplane-based GPS receiver using differential carrier phase observations to position an aerial photogrammetric camera. Several projects have occurred at a variety of places throughout the United States to test the practicability of GCP and perfect the procedures. These projects occurred at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, MD (Oct 92), New Orleans, LA (Feb 93), Sebring, FL (Jul 93), and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (Sep 93). These projects and subsequent results demonstrate that GCP provides a means of accomplishing aerotriangulation with reduced ground control. It also demonstrates the necessity for check points to detect blunders and other errors occurring in the results. Additionally, the elimination of static initialization by using GPS post processing software (with OTF initialization) brings the technique of GCP to production level. 45-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Autonomous Construction Vehicle Navigation and Automation (Robotics) This development effort, part of the Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) program, utilizes a technology transfer partnership between the, Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) and Caterpillar Inc. to develop a system to position, track, and maneuver construction and other equipment -- an off highway truck, a dozer blade, or a motor grade blade -- during their normal construction activities. The positioning system will be based on software developed by TEC that utilizes the Global Positioning System (GPS). This software will be integrated with Caterpillar developed software tools, that serve to automate the construction activities and increase productivity and safety. This effort will assist Caterpillar Inc. to significantly increase thie operational efficiency of its products by providing the ability to precisely position and navigate construction equipment in real time and with a positional accuracy of approximately 4 inches. Use of this system will increase accuracy and efficiency of construction operations by reducing operator' workload and by permitting development of autonomous systems, resulting in greatly increased productivity and 24-hour operational capability. Development of this product to its full potential will give Caterpillar Inc. and the entire U.S. construction industry a considerable competitive and technical advantage in the U.S. and international construction markets. The TEC positioning software was successfully combined with Caterpillar's Dynamic Site Data Base on a Track-type Tractor (dozer) at the Peoria Proving Grounds on December 13-17, 1993. The machine operator was able to prepare a section of a highway construction site without grade stakes or a survey crew, relying on the geographical display on the machine"only. Simultaneously, the dynamic construction site data was broadcast to a remote location (Reference Station/Base) and updated in real time to provide a current, topographic model of the site. Future uses of this technology outside this CPAR effort may permit integration within a total system that performs autonomous steering, braking, guidance, and vehicle control with little or no human interaction, resulting in an autonomously guided robotic construction vehicle. Extensions of this technology may find application in a wide range of existing and advanced forms of freight and passenger transportation, especially those ground-based systems operating at high speeds, such as Maglev or high-speed rail; those whose safety and reliability might be improved by its use, such as rail, truck, anrid air systems; and those systems for which autonomous or semi-autonomous operation are envisioned. Advanced Hydrographic Surveying/Dredging System This CPAR effort involves a computer software program design for hydrographic surveys and dredge positioning. USATEC has partnered with Coastal Oceanographics Incorporated of Durham, Connecticut to build, market and support this system. The objective is to produce surveys in accordance with published standards, in short turn-around time, and introduce the latest technology in positioning and depth measurement. The standards used for the project are taken from USACE EM 1110-2-1003, Hydrographic Surveying. Additional Assistance to Districts TEC Monitors Wetlands with Digital Image Processing During FY93, TEC continued an important transition of off-the-shelf digital image processing technology from military and commercial to environmental applications through involvement in wetlands protection. The Corps of Engineers is the primary regulatory agency involved in the enforcement of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which involves protection and permitting activities for wetlands. To support this mission, TEC scientists and engineers are providing field operating activities support in digital image analysis, geographic information systems, and field work. TEC and the Norfolk District have recently installed a Macintosh-based image analysis system at one of the district field offices. In addition, TEC is providing training and support in the system's operation. TEC and the Norfolk District are also testing digital frame and multiband aerial video for jurisdictional assessment in support of the Corps' Section 404 mission. Criteria Documentation Work has continued on writing and updating criteria documentation for the Corps. The following documents were completed during FY93: * EM 1110-1-1004 ........ Control, Precise and Geodetic Surveying and associated Guide Specification * EM 1110-2-1003 ......... Hydrographic Surveying - rewrite and associated Guide Specification * EM 1110-1-1005 ......... .Topographic Surveying and associated Guide Specification * ETL 1110-1-152 ......... .North American Vertical Datum of 1988 The following report was published in FY93: * TEC-0025 ............. .Existing Resources, Standards, and Procedures for Precise Monitoring and Analysis of Structural Deformations 45-4 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) is a field operating agency under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Center consists of the Institute for Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, the Washington Level Review Center, the Hydrologic Engineering Center, and support elements. WRSC is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California, and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (part of the Navigation Data Center) in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments ofWRSC during FY93 are listed by division. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The mission ofthe Hydrologic Engineering Center is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water resources management responsibilities. This is accomplished through research, training, and technical assistance programs in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis. HEC makes every effort to be aware of the present needs and upcoming problems of the water resources community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue with universities, private industry, other Federal agencies, and state and local governments to keep abreast of the latest developments. In fiscal year 1993, good progress was made in several Important areas: new generation hydrologic engineering software; technical guidance documents; risk-based analysis methods and tools; and cooperative efforts with headquarters and field offices on high-priority projects. Excellent progress was made on our NexGen software development project, initiated in October 1990. The project is developing successor software packages to the existing family of HEC batch computer programs. In this third year, teams are developing beta-test models for catchment and river analysis. Design concepts, program architecture, coding languages and approaches, and graphics tested in the prototype model efforts are the basis for the beta-test versions. The beta version of HECRAS (river analysis system) was due out at the end of February 1994 with the beta version of HEC-HMS (hydrologic modeling system) due out about nine months to one year later. While we plan the packages to be fielded in both UNIX and Microsoft Windows, the beta versions emphasize different platforms to ensure our detailed familiarity with each. The beta version of HEC-RAS has been developed for Microsoft Windows to run on high-end Intel-chip based personal computers. HEC-RAS will also run on personal computers and workstations with Windows NT as the operating system. The beta version of HEC-HMS has been developed to run on RISC-chip based UNIX workstations. HEC-HMS will also run as an X Window process under Microsoft Windows. Beta versions of bothpackages will be made available to all who wish to participate in this testing phase. HEC actively supported and made a few enhancements to the mature versions of the major batch programs HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, IEC-5Q, HEC-6, UNET, HEC-FDA, HEF-IFH and several others. Several user's manuals were also revised and updated this year. Progress continued on development of a new reservoir operations analysis program. The program (coined HECPRM) is a reservoir system operation optimization model developed for application in studies to update operation plans for existing reservoir systems. The model incorporates engineering, economic, and environmental objectives in an optimization framework. It implements a network-flow programming algorithm for monthly period- of-record operation for a reservoir system. The preliminary model, applied to the Missouri River Main Stem Master Water Control Manual Update Study, was substantially improved and then applied to the Columbia River system. On-going work is examining development of system operation rules derived from HEC-PRM results. The program is now available for use within the Corps. Assistance by HEC during applications is expected to be needed for this next year. Progress continues on products for the Corps guidance development project and cost-share partner communications. The assignment is to prepare eight Engineer Manuals, ten Engineer Regulations, seven Engineer Pamphlets, and six Engineer Technical Letters. The status thus far: three EM's completed and three others drafted, completed seven ER's and drafted three others, completed five EP's and drafted two others, completed two ETL's and drafted two others. Notable is completion and publication of EM's addressing flood frequency analysis, river hydraulics, and flood runoff analysis; and EP's addressing hydrologic engineering in cost-shared studies and hydrologic engineering studies design. This year should see completion of the remaining products.,,. The HQUSACE initiative to implement risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction projects was supported through assisting in policy formulation and development, conducting workshops, developing analysis tools, and providing project consultation and assistance. This year the final draft risk-based analysis EC was completed, several versions of Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheets for performing Monte Carlo simulation were developed, and technical methods for quantifying hydrology and hydraulics uncertainty developed and documented. Anew risk-based analysis course was formulated and three sessions will be presented in FY 1994. Nine PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of 10 weeks of training. The courses covered a variety of hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics. Attendance averaged about 29 students per course. Fifteen on-site workshops were alsoheld totaling ten weeks of sessions. Topics presented included risk-based analysis (six sessions), HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, UNET, HEC- 46-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 PRM and ground water modeling. The proceedings from a seminar held the previous year were published (Initial Project Management Plans - IPMPs). Reimbursable project work was undertaken for 15 Corps offices including districts, divisions, headquarters, and R&D laboratories. A research project undertaken for the Federal Emergency Management Agency addressing performance of flood damage reduction measures on alluvial fans was completed. The total reimbursable program was $750,000, with individual projects ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $90,000. Projects include watershed modeling, water quality, riskbased analysis, reservoir system analysis, interior flooding, water control software development, and ground water modeling. The planned program for FY 1994 will conclude development of documents for the HQUSACE guidance program. The beta versions of new NexGen software packages designed for engineering desktop computers in river and catchment analysis will be fielded. Training activities will include up to ten courses totalling 12 weeks. Technical assistance is expected to continue at past levels. R&D funding will be substantially increased. A new R&D program in real-time water control begins in FY 1994. This program will develop analysis approaches and software to support Corps real-time water control into the next century. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH DIVISION The Technical Analysis and Research Division responds to water planning research needs of the field offices, as well as unique projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, technical assistance is provided to Corps field divisions and districts. Engineers and scientists in the division apply specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental science, and geography and engineering to develop and conduct a broad range of research aimed at producing practical and effective planning and management tools. Research outputs are applied to water resources activities throughout the Corps. During FY93, the Technical Analysis and Research Division conducted research and provided technical assistance in the areas of risk analysis and planning methodologies. The division played a key role in assisting in the development of the Corps' risk-based guidance, training and models for majorrehabilitation projects. In addition, guidance was developed in cooperation with the Hydrologic Engineering Center for risk-based planning for levee and other flood control projects. This year, research in planning methodologies focused on developing evaluation methodologies for planning environmental restoration projects. Two case studies with Corps field offices were initiated to develop techniques for environmental evaluation. Also, guidelines for incremental cost analysis for environmental mitigation were developed and disseminated to the field. These guidelines will serve as a base for establishing generic guidance for evaluating contributions to fish and wildlife habitat. A new course in environmental evaluation was developed and conducted for Corps field planners. Other activities of the division were the initiation of a cooperative program with USGS to develop and provide educationalmaterials for training young people in water resources topics. In cooperation with the field and IIEC, an effort to develop a reservoir systems operations optimization model for the Missouri and Columbia River systems continued. These models enable the Corps to assess reservoir system operations that maximize the economic value of the system while protecting environmental resources. POLICY DIVISION The Division program for FY93 included policy analysis, strategic planning and major studies of wetlands mitigation banking, water management during drought, development of a Federal infrastructure strategy, and a separate program of policy and strategic studies focusing on implementing and improving the Corps legislated responsibilities. The Wetlands Mitigation Banking Study is reviewing and analyzing technical, legal, financial and other administrative aspects relevant to the establishment and operation of wetland mitigation banks. Also included is an evaluation of potential application to the Corps Regulatory Program and the feasibility of a demonstration program. Work on the study is scheduled tobe completed in FY94. The National Study of Water Management During Drought has designed an archetypal water resources management approach which integrates long established planning principles and innovations in computer modeling, demand management, dispute resolution and public involvement. This method is results oriented, rather than process oriented, and has been tested and refined in four Drought Preparedness case studies across the country, and will be published in the Spring ofFY94. A report to Congress will conclude the study, along with 12 technical reports to be published during FY94. The Federal Infrastructure Strategy is designed to develop innovative ways to advance technical, administrative, governmental, public and private financing, economic policies, and other opportunities for improving infrastructure performance and ensuring more efficient investments. The program is being managed by the Corps as a cooperative, intergovernmental effort. Study 46-2 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER development has involved representatives of Federal, state and local governments, numerous organizations, the academic community, and public works associations in a far-reaching dialogue of the barriers and opportunities to the delivery and management of the Nation's public works infrastructure. Several reports have been published, highlighted by ajoint effort with the Advisory. Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, titled"High Performance Public Works." The FY93 projects included in the general policy studies program, among others, were guidance on environmental restoration planning; the Corps Civil Works Environmental Action Program; the Global Change Program (representing Army in UNCED, IPCC, CEES); the Study of Dredged Material Management (Deep Draft); preparation of an Environmental Desk Reference for field use; the Great Lakes Levels Reference Study; and case studies on the Economic Impacts of Climate Change in watersheds and the coastal zone. NAVIGATION DIVISION The IWR Navigation Division provides support to Corps field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements. It also provides support for the Inland Waterways Users Board and performs special studies as directed by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The special studies address a variety of subjects where expertise in economic analysis is required, and range from assessment of transportation infrastructure to identification of economic impacts. 0Continuine Sunort Activities. The foundation for evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed improvements. The division maintains and annually updates data on ocean and inland waterway vessel operating costs, the dimensions of those vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. Coordination of Navigation Studies. The Inland Waterways Users Board, created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland waterways. To provide information desired by the Board and by the Corps, the division leads a Corps Task Force which is updating the evaluation of 38 high priority inland navigation projects to determine the sequence which would maximize net national transportation benefits and observe the budget constraints imposed by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIVISION The Program Analysis Division provides analytic and process management services in support of improving the effectiveness of Civil Works program execution. During FY93, the primary clients of the division were Operations and Management Division, Project Management Division, and Programs Division. Representative projects include the continued development of an incremental analysis procedure for prioritizing maintenance projects; the development of a comprehensive training and career development master plan for project managers; and the development of a "business approach" for the Corps recreation program consisting of quality standards, performance measures and tracking system. In FY93, the division also administered the Corps Alternative Dispute Resolution Program. The division provided reimbursable assistance to a number of Corps districts including: Buffalo District for facilitation and collaborative problem solving services for an interagency dredge management task force; and, Galveston District for the design of procedures for estimating vessel casualty rates. NAVIGATION DATA CENTER The Navigation Data Center's mission is to collect, process, manage, and distribute information regarding the characteristics of the U.S. waterway system, including use, operation and performance, and physical aspects. Included is system-wide use data such as domestic and foreign commodity tonnage and ton-miles, passengers, vessel movements and lockages; physical facilities, vessels and waterways; and, operation and performance data for dredging and locks. During FY93, the Center focused on producing executive products for the decisionmaking process. In addition, NDC implemented a standardized ORACLE relational database design for the major systems, and the majority of the data systems are linked via the CEAP communication environment. The modernization and integration of each data area continues. The Center consists of the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, the Ports and Waterways Division, the Waterways Systems Division, the Lock Performance Monitoring Program, and the Dredging Statistics Program. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS CENTER (WCSC) In FY93, Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center's new computer software became fully operational. WCSC published waterborne commerce data for calendar years 1990 and 1992. In addition, WCSC completed the implementation of a computer representation of the waterway network for the 50 states, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, 46-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 and Pacific Islands in U.S. trust. It includes the inland waterway system, coastal channels, the Great Lakes, and major shipping lanes. WCSC's routing algorithm uses this waterway network to route vessel movements from origin to destination which enables through traffic and past-a-point computations. WCSC began digitizing the waterway network into a 1:100,000 scale latitude/ longitude representation suitable for using in a geographic information system. PORTS AND WATERWAYS Automated port facility information is being integrated into the overall NDC database. Latitude/longitude coordinates are being included in each facility record, as well as being computed for each waterway mile point, thereby forming a commonality for interagency dissemination of port and waterway information. Descriptive data encompassing over 9,300 docking facilities is resident in the NDC database. Focus for FY93 - Linkage across databases including key terms, and input to Executive Workstation. In FY93, four reports were completed: Number Title 1 Ports of Hampton Roads, VA (Norfolk, Newport News, Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Hampton and Ports on the James and York Rivers 25 Corpus Christi, TX 35 Tacoma, Olympia and Grays Harbor, WA 63 Louisville, KY, Ports on Ohio River Miles 560-980, and Cumberland and Green Rivers LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (LPMS) FY93 saw the continuation of enhancement and revision of the LPMS central system for ORACLE and users interface. An NDC bulletin board was created for public and Corps access for general NDC information and data. Two new reports were distributed: (1)"Lock Characteristics: Operational Statistics for Locks on the Inland Waterways" and (2) "Lock Performance Monitoring System: Annual Summary of Lock Statistics," which was revised to now include three sections: Section 1 - Lock Characteristics Annual Report; Section 2 -Annual Summary by River Basin; and Section 3- Annual Summary by Division/District. DREDGING STATISTICS PROGRAM In FY93, the Dredging Statistics Program successfully implemented Phase II of the planned three-phase approach in the establishment of a national Dredging Information System. The Interim Dredging Information System (IDIS), which contains data elements that track each dredging contract from initial pre-bid through final execution, is being used by all districts responsible for navigation dredging. There, dredging data are entered at the district and uploaded monthly, or as needed, to the central database at NDC. The Dredging Statistics Program oversight of data quality and program integrity has resulted in a timely, accurate, and complete database capable of rapid response to data requests. The data are available to support managementdecisions within a local, regional and national framework. The completion of a comprehensive dredging data dictionary and the incorporation of selected dredgingdata into theNDC ORACLE database contributes to the integration of all NDC navigation data. Database reports are also available on a public access bulletin board system maintained by the Navigation Data Center. THE WASHINGTON LEVEL REVIEW CENTER The mission of the Washington Level Review Center (WLRC) is to review feasibility reports, post-authorization change reports, general and limited reevaluation reports, and other decision documents that the Director of Civil Works may request. These reports address proposed water resource developments involving deepdraft harbors, inland navigation, flood damage reduction, fish and wildlife restoration and mitigation, hurricane and storm damage protection, and other related water resource needs. In addition to reviewing reports, during FY93 WLRC: a. Managed the concurrent Washington level review process for feasibility reports in which projects have been recommended for Corps implementation. b. Coordinated feasibility report review comments from Washington echelons and provided information to assist the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH), the Chief of Engineers, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Office of Management and Budget. c. Monitored and tracked the review and processing of feasibility reports recommending Corps' action beginning with issuance of the division commander's public notice through project authorization. d. Provided all administrative support to the BERH and its advisory staff. 46-4 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER e. Conducted professional training in water resources planning and project management as directed by the Chief of Engineers. WLRC managed the comprehensive review of eight feasibility reports recommending USACE action. In addition, WLRC staff reviewed and provided written documentation for 18 design memoranda, 12 detailed project reports, 19 reevaluation reports, 13 feasibility reports recommending no USACE action, and 43 miscellaneous documents. Also, staff members reviewed draft reports in preparation for attendance at 30 conferences and completed 24 follow-up actions. The WLRC Education and Policy Division conducted the Planners and Project Managers (PPM) Program. This program is an 11-month internship for Corps water resource planners, project managers, and other technical personnel from various areas of expertise who exhibit exceptional promise and demonstrate potential for advancement to positions of greater responsibility. There were 13 participants graduated from this program in June 1993, including three women. Instruction in the form of lectures, workshops, short courses, case studies, and field trips was presented by staffmembers of WLRC, IWR, MSC and district offices, and HQUSACE. A number of representatives from other government agencies and private consulting firms participated in the instruction. Also, PPMs were assigned to work at HQUSACE for six weeks, and they taught the Planners and Project Managers Orientation Course for two weeks in several Corps offices. 46-5 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization consisting of approximately 40 national members, with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published as a result of international research teams, called Working Groups, made up of those national members interested in the particular subject under study. Examples include methods of disposal of dredged material, means of combating oil spills, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the beneficial use of dredged material, and other various topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every four years. The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent International Commission (PIC), composed of delegates from each member government. It is in this way that member governments are represented in PIANC. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national membership, but may not exceed eleven per country. The United States has been a member of PIANC since 1902 and has since provided an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization. This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of the travel expenses of properly accredited national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the International Commission and Congresses. Total appropriations for the U.S. Section, PIANC are currently $45,000 per year, including the annual subvention of approximately $15,000 to PIANC International. The United States Section is administered, by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay their own membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on September 30, 1993, totaled 406, consisting of 338 individual members and 68 corporate members. Like all other member nations, the United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. The ex-officio offices of the U.S. National Commission are: Chairman (Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); President (Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. DuWayne A. Koch). During fiscal year 1993, U.S. National Commissioners were: Mr. Charles F. Connors, Director of Maritime Services, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Dr. Tudor T. Davies, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. G. Edward Dickey, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works); Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, Director, George Washington/Louisiana State University Ports and Waterways Institute; Mr. Charles F. Lehman, Vice President, American Commercial Barge Line Company; Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Charles R. Roberts, Executive Director, Port of Oakland; and Mr. R. Erik Stromberg, President, American Association of Port Authorities. SThe U.S. Section representatives to the two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and active Working Groups of PTCs were as follows: International Commission on the Environment -Dr. Robert M. Engler, USACE WES Permanent Committee for Development and Cooperation - Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Permanent Technical Committee I (Inland Waterways and Ports) - U.S. Representative Vacant Working Group 6, Problems Created by Saltwater Infiltration - Christina E. Correale, USACE SAW Working Group 12, Design, Installation and Maintenance of Natural Vegetation Bank Protections Utilizing Geotextile Reinforcement for Inland Waterways - Max Lamb, USACE LMVD Working Group 14, Inland Waterway Vessels and Pollution - Darrell D. Brown, International Maritime Organization (London, England) Working Group 15, Barge Fleeting-Jerry F. Lavelle, P.E., Tri-City Regional Port District Working Group 16, Coasters-No U.S. Representative Working Group 17, Treatment and/or Disposal of Contaminated Dredged Material - Norman R. Francingues, Jr., USACE WES Working Group 18, Advanced Control of Locks and Bridges - No U.S. Representative Working Group 19, Problems of Collisions Due to the Presence of Bridges - No U.S. Representative Working Group 20, Standardisation of Dimensions of Class Vb Navigation Canals - No U.S. Representative Permanent Technical Committee II (Maritime Ports and Seaways) - Thorndike Saville, Jr. (Retired) Working Group 7, Dimensions and Layout of One and Two-Way Channels and Fairways-Dr. ErnstG. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Group 11, Consequences of New Developments of Car/Passenger Ferries - No U.S. Representative Working Group 13, Floating Breakwaters - John Oliver, USACE NPD Working Group 16, Specification of Quantities and Related Risks on Maritime Transportation of Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes - Patrick Tobin, USEPA Working Group 18, Planning of Fishing Ports - No U.S. Representative 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTMVITIES FOR FY 1993 Working Group 22, Armored Slopes Under Piled Piers - Dennis V. Padron, Han-Padron Associates Working Group 23, Site Investigation Requirements for Dredging - Richard M. Lowry, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Co. Working Group 24, Movement of Moored Ships- Gary K. Greene, Gary Greene Consulting Eng. Working Group 25, Coastal Instrumentation - No U.S. Representative Working Group 26, Means of Combating Oil Spills - No U.S. Representative Working Group 27, Artificial Islands -- Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Group 28, Breakwaters with Vertical and Inclined Concrete Walls - No U.S. Representative Working Group 29, Recommendations for By-Pass Systems for Harbours on Sandy Coasts - J. Richard Weggel, Drexel University Working Group 30, Dimensions of Channels and Fairways- A Practical Guide - No U.S. Representative Working Group (number to be announced) The Effects of Degradation and Damage to Marine Structures of Different Types and Recommendations for Life Cycle Management, including Inspection, Maintenance and Repair - No U.S. Representative Special Commission for Sport and Pleasure Navigation - John M. Nichol, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers (Retired) Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Neil W. Ross, International Marina Institute Working Group 2, Wave Climate Criteria for the Design of Yacht Harbors and Marinas - Orson Smith, Anchorage, AK Working Group 6, Use ofJetskis and Similar Personal Powered Craft on Controlled Waters - Roger F. Hagie, Kawasaki Motors Corp. Working Group 7, Marine Sanitation Pumpouts - Edward F. McKiernan, SeaLand Technology, Inc. 47-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation numerous international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical, or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources ofjoint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 48-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY80 annual reports. An innovative study organization, neither a board nor a committee, was established to initiate a study of impact from fluctuating Great Lakes levels pursuant to a Reference to the IJC from the Governments of Canada and the United States, dated August 1, 1986. A discussion of that study organization, which has since appointed a formal study board, follows Table 48-1. TABLE 48-1 IJC BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Int. Lake Superior Int. St. Croix River Int. Lake of the Woods Int. Lake Champlain Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lake Diversios and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board YEAR ESTABLISHED 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 1948 1975 1977 1979 :*Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA * 1.'Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. * 1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 3. NY Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Environ. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Environ. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commision, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. CENCE-ED, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS YEAR BOARD NAME ESTABLISHED 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20., Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference. In 1986, the Governments of Canada and the United States issued a reference to the IJC to study methods to alleviate the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC was requested to address the immediate high lake level crisis and identify and evaluate intermediate and long-term potential measures, while considering such vital matters as domestic waste supply and sanitation, navigation, agriculture, shore property, flood control, wildlife and others. The IJC is to determine the full costs and benefits of any works or measures and indicate how thevarious interests on either side of theboundary would be affected. Compensatory works or measure to offset costs to the interests which may be adversely affected by any proposed regulatory measures also must be determined. The IJC proceeded with its reference responsibilities on three tracks. First, it submitted an initial report to the federal governments on November 14, 1986, listing immediate actions that could be taken to lessen damages from the then current high water levels. Second, the IJC formed a taskforce to evaluate measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce high lake levels. The third track is the comprehensive study of long-term measures. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Tulsa, AR The IJC, through the U.S. Department of State, requested by letter dated November 24, 1986 that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support on what became known as the Levels Reference Study. The Division Commander, NCD assumed the role of U.S. Chair of a multi-discipline study group which functioned as a Project Management Team. The team consisted of five functional groups co-chaired by U.S. and Canadian representatives. The Canadian counterpart to the Corps of Engineers was Environment Canada. A Plan of Study was completed in April 1987. The plan called for a twophase study with the initial phase emphasizing problem identification and a program of measures for detailed study and evaluation in Phase II. The Phase I progress report was submitted to the IJC in July 1989. After a period of public review in February 1990, the IJC issued a directive for the Phase II study, which included the appointment of a ten-member Levels Reference Study Board. The Board appointed a full-time study director and a 18-member Citizens Advisory Committee. Upon completion of the Phase II Plan of Study in May 1990, the Board also appointed four Working Committees to carry out the detailed study plan. The working committees are: (1) Public Participation and Information; (2) Land use and Management; (3) Existing Regulation, System-wide Regulation, and Crisis Conditions; and (4) Principles, Measures Evaluation, Integration and Implementation. 48-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC), composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development of all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the Commission be performed by and through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Sections 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the Commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Part II and III were added to the act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of the Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, Federal Regulation 46267 (September 16, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of the Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission with the Department of Energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers, on September 5, 1980, delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of the plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: (1) Two hundred twenty-one (221) applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, structural safety, and environmental impacts, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC; (2) 23 licensed power plants were in various stages of design review and approval for addition of power at Corps dams, and (3) two Corps approved non-Federal power plants were in active construction stages by the end of the fiscal year. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the cost incurred by the Corps for reviewing and approving final design, plans and specifications and construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY 93 the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $207,723. Review and approval of license applications for hydropower development atnon-Corps dams are funded by the Corps as a line item in the General Investigation Account. In FY 93, the cost of this activity was $370,636. This cost was reported to the FERC for collection from appropriate licensees. 49-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various construction related activities in U. S. waters and wetlands: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in the alteration of waterways); Section 103 of the Marine, Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Ocean Dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged or fill material) Work Completed. During FY 1993, the Corps received approximately 13,800 applications for permits and issued 4,900 permits and 3,200 letters of permission. In addition, about 18,000 activities were authorized by regional or statewide permits which did not require full processing and evaluation procedures. More than 50,000 minor actions were authorized by Corps nationwide permits. In August 1993, the Corps and the Environmental Protection Agency jointly issued regulations that closed a loophole in the Section 404 regulations that had allowed discharges of excavated materials in conjunction with wetlands drainage activities to go unregulated. Also in August, the President announced his Wetlands Plan which was designed not only to improve wetlands protection but also to make the regulatory process more fair and easier for the regulated public. The plan required the establishment of an administrative appeal process whereby the public an challenge certain Corps regulatory decisions without the expense of litigation. The plan also set deadlines for permit application review. The Corps was to develop procedures over the next year in order to implement these requirements. During FY 93, the Corps began testing of procedures to establish its Wetland Delineator Certification Program. Once established in all districts, the program will allow the Corps to certify individuals as qualified to do wetland delineations. The program creates a national pool of wetland delineation for the Corps regulatory process. During FY 93 the Corps began an initiative to promote the use of state programmatic general permits. These permits reduce duplication of effort between the Corps and states by reducing Corps review of minor activities that are already covered by state programs. TABLE A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 92 ........ $ 2,112,012 Allotments...................... 86,000,000 Total Funds Available ......................... 88,112,012 Obligations ........................ ***.* *********** 86,798,826 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ........ $ 1,313,196 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 92........... $ 5,097,813 Allotm ent .............................................. 86,000,000 Total Funds Available ........................ 91,097,813 Expenditures..................................... 87,337,717 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93.......... $ 3,760,096 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1988, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligation expenditures, see Table B TABLE B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 92 ........... $ Allotments............................................ Total Funds Available ...................... O bligations ............................................. Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ........... $ Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 92........... $ A llotm ent ............................................... Total Funds Available ............................ Expenditures.......................................... Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 92........... $ 21,375 361,000 383,375 333,573 48,802 28,530 361,000 389,530 333,573 55,957 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies in order to undertake the national emergency planning and preparedness activities necessary to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic crises and national security emergencies. Status. During FY 1993, the Corps of Engineers continued its effort to improve the command's readiness posture and its ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis was placed on the activities necessary for a successful transition from a "cold war" focus to preparedness associated with catastrophic natural disasters and adjusting Continuity of Government (COG) programs. This included the continuation of the supporting Engineer Command Readiness Program (ECRP) activities. During FY 1993, ECRP activities 50-1 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1993 included refining the information already developed regarding Corps readiness roles and responsibilities for the 1990's (and into the 21st century)), identifying the resources and organization required to accommodate the Corps missions and beginning the implementation phase of this effort. Other activities included a continuation of the planning for and maintenance of emergency facilities needed to support continuity of operations. Executive Order 12656 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the lead Federal Agency responsible for national emergency water planning. In this regard, an interagency working group was established to set objectives and requirements. For fiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table C. TABLE C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 92 ........... $ 1,205,103 Appropriations FY 93 ............................ 6,077,954 Total Funds Available ............................ $ 7,283,057 Obligations ............................................. 6,423,741 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 93 ........... $ 859,316 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 92........... $ 1,880,245 Appropriations FY 93 ............................. 6,077,954 Total Funds Available ......................... $ 7,958,199 Expenditures.......................................... 6,397,156 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 93........... $ 1,561,043 50-2 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Activities. Major disaster preparedness activities included: the review and updating of response plans to ensure viability, sustainment training personnel to ensure their ability to respond in adverse circumstances, procurement and pre-positioning of critical equipment and supplies which would likely not be available during initial stages of a response, periodic exercises to test and evaluate plans and personnel, inspection of non-Federal flood control projects to ensure their integrity to provide flood protection, and the overall management of the response program to ensure a workable and coordinated effort. In addition, work continues on response planning activities related to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Federal Response Plan for providing engineering and construction support following catastrophic events. During FY 93, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers continued to be actively involved in disaster events. In the aftermath of the later summer 1992 disasters of Hurricane Andrew in Florida and Louisiana, Typhoon Omar in Guam, and Hurricane Iniki in Hawaii, the Corps conducted active missions into the fall of 1992. FEMA directed the Corps to execute many of our Emergency Support Function #3 missions, such as: debris clearance, removal, and disposal; temporary roofing, potable water and ice, temporary showers and laundry facilities, generators to support public utilities, technical assistance, and preparation of damage survey reports. The winter of 1993 saw a continuation of disaster relief activities ranging from the northeasters along the Atlantic seaboard to the Great Arizona Flood along the Gila River. The Great Arizona Flood involved a tremendous reservoir flood management effort at Painted Rock Dam. The summer of 1993 saw one of the worst floods that has ever hit the Midwest. The Midwest Flood of 1993 had its beginnings with higher than average snowfall and late seasonal melt-off that saturated the ground. In June, an extraordinary shift in thejet stream trapped rain clouds over the region. The resulting rainfall was one-and-ahalf to three times normal precipitation on the already saturated soil. The rain rapidly ran off into streams and rivers causing massive flooding in the Upper Mississippi River and Lower Missouri River Basins. During the Midwest Flood of 1993, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers performed emergency flood control operations throughout the Midwest. The Corps supplied over 31,000,000 sandbags and 430 water pumps to threatened communities, and provided emergency water to Des Moines, Iowa, after the local water treatment facility was knocked out of operation and the water supply contaminated. The Corps also coordinated the operation of 100 water distribution points throughout the city. These flood fight operation activities (Public Law 84-99) exceeded $200,000,000 in support to state and local governments. The Corps also provided assistance undervarious FEMA mission assignments which totaled over $20,309,000. Following the floods, the Corps continued to assist local, state, and Federal authorities in the rehabilitation of damaged levees. This rehabilitation effort necessitated Congressional action on a FY 93 supplemental appropriations bill which provided $180 million for emergency operation activities and levee rehabilitation. 51-1 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of D)arn Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (F1eet) AIASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alano) Cave Buttes )reamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Dam Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Giliham Millwood Narrows Dam Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam- I.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Farmington Fullerton Hansen HIarry L. Englebright Hlidden Damalensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New tlogan North Fork PineF lat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Whittier Narrows COLORADO Bear Creek Cha lfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad Yukon -Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Ouachita Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Red Ouachita Arkansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Santa Ana Russian Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Mojave San Joaquin Sacramento San Joaquin Santa Ana Santa Ana San Gabriel Los Angeles San Joaquin San Joaquin San Gabriel Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Chena River Skunk Creek Bill Williams River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Ouachita Petit Jean River Caddo Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Little River Little Missouri Fourche La Fave River Stony Creek Brea Creek Chowchilla River Carbon Canyon River Fast Fork Russian River Dry Creek Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Creek Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Pacoimna Wash Martis Creek Bear Creek Burns Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave River Calaveras River American River Kings River Santa Ana River San Antonio Creek San Gabriel River Los Angeles River Tule River Kaweaih River San Gabriel River and Rio Ilondo Bear Creek South Platte River Chlerry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Fairbanks Phoenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Gila Bend Casa Grande Superior lHot Springs Paris Arkadelphia DeQueen Dierks Gillham Ashdown Murfreesboro Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Healdsburg Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield San Fernanado Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn Piedra Corona Upland Duarte Van Nuys Porterville Visalia El Monte Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad 1979 2,000 NPP FR 1982 18,350 1968 1,046,310 1979 46,600 1973 320 1985 43,520 1959 2,476,340 1974 198,550 '960 34,500 1955 2,768,500 1947 257,900 1971 881,900 1977 136,100 1975 96,800 1975 221,800 1966 1,854,930 1949 407,900 1942 336,010 1963 160,000 1942 4,010 1975 150,000 1961 6,610 1959 122,500 1983 381,000 1952 52,000 1941 760 1940 25,450 1941 69,000 1975 90,000 1953 570,000 1954 440 1971 20,400 1954 7,700 1950 7,000 1948 15,000 1949 3,600 1971 89,670 1963 325,000 1939 14,700 1954 1,000,000 1941 196,240 1956 7,700 1948 22,110 1941 17,430 1960 85,000 S1961 150,000 1967 35,150 1978 30,810 1974 231,429 1950 93,920 1943 608,250 1977 123,523 NPP FR 560 FRWX NPP FRX NPP FRX NPP F NPP FRWX NPP GWX NPP FX 20,900 FP 2,910 FRWX 6,400 FRZRS 1,680 FSQRW 1,360 FSRAW 1,370 FSQW 29,200 FSW 2,500 FP 3,550 FSWX 770 FIRX NPP FRX 470 FIRW NPP FERX 1,700 FRX 500 FRSW NPP F NPP FRX 120 FRWX 400 DR 5,000 FIRW 1,850 FIRW NPP FX 71 FSR NPP F NP F NPP F NPP F NPP FRWX 715 FIRX 280 DR NPP FIRX NPP FRX NPP FX NPP FRX NPP FRX 400 FIRX 345 FIRX NPP FRWX 109 FRX 1,412 FRX 852 FRX 1,844 FIR 280 FIRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 50 40,200 10)9 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 50 448 104 2,320 1281 4,780 75.5 12,500 149 637 Earth 235 1,100 Earth 115 2,800 Earth 243 3,400 Earth 160 2,360 Earth & Rock 153 2,500 Earth & Rock 160 1,750 Earth 88 17,554 Concrete 175 941 Concrete 97 1,012 Earth 156 2,970 Earth 87 1,765 Earth & Rock 205.5 1,800 Earth 199 2,610 Earth 160 3,500 Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth 319 3,000 60 7.800 45 575 97 10,475 280 1,142 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 Earth 92 1,830 Earth 55 4,075 Earth 88 1,330 Earth 75 790 Earth 200 2,200 Earth & Rock 210 1,960 Concrete 155 620 Concrete 429 1,820 Earth 106 2,280 Earth 160 3,850 Earth 92 23,800 Earth 57 15,444 Earth 142 3,490 Earth 250 2,375 Earth 56 19,960 Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth 180 5,300 148 12,400 141 14,300 106 13,962 200 6,610 A-i APPENDIX A (Continued)- FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community " Placed in Storage or No Project Ileight Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Fect) Housatonic Branch Brook Connecticut West Branch, Farmington River Housatonic I lancock Brook Housatonic I lop Brook Thames Natchaug River Thames Northfield Brook IHousatonic Naugatuck River Thames Quinebaug River Columbia Boise River Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hlancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson IDAHO Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie IOWA Coralville Red Rock Rathburn Saylorville KANSAS Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvern Milford Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thonaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere HIaute Rockville tluntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Des Moines Centerville Des Moines Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River tlillsdale Burlington Marquette Marion Melvern Junction City Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn 1970 8,700 20 FR 1969 97,700 760 FRSX 1960 4,030 40 FRW 1968 6,970 21 FR 1952 52,000 450 FRW 1965 2,430 8 FRW 1960 42,000 NPP F 1965 26,800 200 FRW 1954 307,000 2,820 FIR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1967 983,000 26,000 FSNRWA Earth 1951 15,500 NPP F Earth 1951 3,780 NPP F Earth 1970 684,000 11,100 FSNRW Earth 1970 294,000 18,900 FQRSW Earth 1974 359,600 1952 228,120 1960 132,800 1969 153,100 1967 368,400 1964 441,000 1978 301,600 1966 263,600 2,250 FRSW Earth& Rock 1,400 FRX Earth 1,100 FRX Earth 500 FRW Earth 1,100 FRW Earth 3,280 FARS Earth 2,010 FRSQW Earth & Rock 976 FRW Earth Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio A-2 East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Iowa River Des Moines River Chariton River Des Moines River Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marais des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill Creek Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River 1958 492,000 1,820 FARW Earth 1969 1,830,000 8,950 FARWQ Earth 1969 552,000 11,000 FNRWXQ Earth 1975 602,000 74,000 FARWQ Earth 1977 397,200 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 1964 112,882 3,310 FSQR Earth 1981 246,825 8,400 FSQR Earth 1966 287,200 4,440 FSQWR Earth 1949 254,900 2,330 FSXQR Earth 1981 160,000 4,580 FSQR Earth 1964 628,540 9,670 FSQR Earth 1948 450,000 3,815 FRWX Earth 1968 141,770 6,210 FRQS Earth 1972 363,000 6,930 FRQWX Earth 1965 1,160,000) 15,600 I FRSXWQ Earth&Rock 1981 34,540 1,190 FSRW Earth 1969 770,000 12,500 FRSXW Earth&Rock 1963 230,000 4,0(00 FRSWXQ Earth&Rock 1960 200,800 2,660 FXSQWR Earth 1962 2,346,000 15,800 FRWXQAN Farth&Rock 1964 776,000 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth 1964 815,200 4,340 FARS Earth 1960 168,000 550 FQRW Earth 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 340 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 182 3,000 150 950 117 1,790 91 5,332 137 8,100 93 1,400 84 1,550 133 6,100 100 1,400 110 5,676 86 10,600 125 6,750 114 9,250 96 6,500 99 20,930 107 4,840 94 6,015 75 11,600 86.5 21,790 1 31 15.360 67 8,375 98 9.700 126 6,300 83 3,902 96 7,750 85 7,750 90 4,712 157 7,500 160 5,600 146 3,970 162 1,020 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE.SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) KENTUCKY (continued) Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook Fast Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big StoneLa ke- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blain Creek Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou Potomac North Branch Pototmac River Connecticut Connecticut Thames Charles Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connnecticut Blackstone 11names Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Red River of the North Red River of the North Ware River Millers River Little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Quinebaug River Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Minnesota River Otter Tail River Red Lake River Hazard Farmers Paintsville Pikeville Grayson Campbells -ville Ilarlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Yatesville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Roylaston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington Chester Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River 1976 47,700 530 FQRW Earth & Rock 130 720 1974 614,100 6,790 FQRW Earth & Rock 148 2,740 1949 93,000 1,100 FARW Earth 118 913 1968 164,360 569 FARW Rock 195 1,100 1967 118,990 1,050 1969 723,200 5,070 1978 21,00 578 1983 73,500 261 1963 609,400 2,890 1958 334,400 2,180 1983 291,670 1,625 1988 86,951 3,921 1949 357,300 NPP 1971 175,000 32,700 1946 96,100 2,300 FQRW FRSQW FQ FQRW FAR FRX FQRW FQRW Earth & Rock 120 1,460 Earth & Rock 142 2,350 Concrete 97 574 Earth & Rock 160 1,600 Earth & Rock 174 990 Earth& Rock 124 1,530 Earth & Rock 164 1,280 Earth& Rock 105 760 FRW Earth 70 12,850 NFRS Concrete 3,7() & Earth FQRS Earth 30 4,994 1981 130,900 952 FQRS Earth & Rock 296 2,130 1958 24,000 NPP FRW 1941 49,900 NPP FRW 1958 12,700 200 FRW 1983 35,000 NPP F 1966 3,740 NPP F 1960 30,000 360 FRW 1959 12,800 NPP FRW 1941 49,000 NPP FRW 1965 32,400 275 FRWS 1949 22,000 300 FRW 1960 12,350 NPP FRW 1961 11,100 23 FRW 1973 45,000 12,700 FRW 1950 (2) NPP FRWX Earth & Rock 62 885 Earth & Rock 56 1,400 Earth & Rock 66 3,255 Nonstructural Earth & Rock 85 1,050 Earth & Rock 55 520 Earth & Rock 55 2,140 Earth & Rock 160 1,200 Earth & Rock 1,164 1,360 Earth & Rock 62 1,570 Earth & Rock 51 2,400 Earth & Rock 78 560 Earth 25 13,700 Earth & Rock 21 17,97 1950 122,800 6,500 FRWX Earth& Rock 21 4,100 1953 14,100 210 FARS Earth& Rock 19.5 11,800 1953 14,100 210 FARS Eaart&h Rock 47 1,355 1951 3,270,000 279,000 FARSX Earth & Rock 15.5 36,500 Lower Coldwater River Mississippi Lower Yocona River Mississippi Lower Yalobusha River Mississippi Pascagoula Okatibbee Creek Lower Little Tallahatchie Mississippi River White Grande Chariton Black River Little Charlton Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon 1943 525,300 5,100 F 1951 660,000 6,100 F 1954 1,337,400 9,800 F 1969 142,400 1,280 FQSR 1940 1,570,000 10,700 F Earth & Rock 81 11,500 Earth & Rock 99 8,400 Earth & Rock 102 13,900 Earth 67 6,543 Earth & Rock 117 15,300 1948 413,700 1,630 FRWX Earth & Rock 154 4,225 1980 65,000 2,430 FRSQW Earth 71 3,800 A-3, MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch ,APPENDIX A (Continued), FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MISSOURI (continued) Little Blue River Lakes Blue Springs Lake Longview Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Ed Zorinsky (Site 18) Weluhrspann (Site 20) Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Site (9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Conestoga (Site 12) Town Lake (Site 13) Pawnee (Site 14) Holmes ark Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW IIAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Lower Mississippi Little Blue River Kansas City Little Blue River Kansas City Pomme de Terre River I lermitage Little Platte River Smithiville St. Francis River Wappapello Missouri Republican River Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Knight Creek Trib of Big Papillion Creek Boxelder Creek S. Pipillion Creek 1988 26,600 1986 46,900 1961 650,000 1982 246,500 1941 613,200 560 FRWQ 930 FRWQ 7,820 FRWX 7,190 FSQRW 4,100 FR Republican City 1952 850,000 13,600 FIRWX Omaha Omaha Omaha Omaha S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek Kramer N. Trib Olive Br. Creek Sprague N. Trib. Hlickman Creek Hlolland S. Trib. Hickman Creek Hickman Cardwell Creek Denton Holmes Creek Denton Middle Creek Pleasantdale N. Middle Creek Emerald Antelope Creek Lincoln Oak Creek Raymond Merrimack Blackwater River Merrimack Nubanusit Brook Merrimack Pemigewasset River Merrimack Contoocook River Merrimack Piscataquog River Connecticut Otter Brook Connecticut Ashuelot River Colorado Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Rio Grande Rio Charma Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Canadian River Rio Grrande Galisteo Creek Rio Grande Jemez River Rio Grande Rio Hondo Rio Grande Rocky Arroyoo) Pecos Pecos Susquehanna Canacadea Creek Susquehanna Canisteo Creek Susquehanna Ouleout Creek Genesee Genesee River Susquehanna Otselic River Webster West Peterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Calienle Calienle Abiquio Pena Blanca Tucumcari Santa Fe Bernailillo Roswell Santa Rosa Hornell Arkport Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point 1975 17910 1973' 5,220 1991 6,910 1991 1,990 1964 5,470 1963 10,260 1963 9,280 1964 6,640 1966 7,560 1964 10,640 1966 8,080 1965 29,520 1963 6,510 1968 97,560 1941 46,000 1950 12,800 1943 154,000 1962 71,500 1962 87,500 1958 18,300 1941 32,500 391 FQEX 137 FRX 418 FR 203 FR 174 FR 316 FR 303 FR 196 FB 208 FR 230 FR 255 FR 728 FR 100 FR 1,780 FR NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW 120 FRW 85 FRW 265 FRW 1957 6,271 NPP FX 1957 7,747 NPP FX 1963 1,198,500 1975 589,159 1939 513,900 1970 89,468 1953 100,485 1963 163,775 NPP FXS 1,200 FRWX 2,694 Fl NPP FX NPP FX NPP FX Earth&Rock 78 2,500 Earth& Rock 120 1,900 Earth&Rock 155 4,630 Earth 95 4,200 Earth & Rock 109 2,700 Earth & Rock 107 11,827 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth 1979 439,860 NPP FIX Earth 1949 14,600 1940 7,900 1950 33,550 1952 337,000 1942 86,440 124 FRW Earth NPP F Earth 210 FRW Concrete & Earth 170 FR Concrete 1,200 FRW Earth 67 1,940 70 1,460 64 11,400 59 11,810 45 3,020 57 2,760 52 1,650 48 2,250 52 3,100 63 3,000 65 5,000 55 7,700 70 5,200 75 1,150 67 1,030 140 1,740 76 790 115 2,000 133 1,288 86 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 1,540 241 28,300 200 19,400 156 2,820 146.6 780 998 4,885 118 2,940 212 1,950 90 1,260 113 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 A-4 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Danm Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NORTHi CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bownmian-laley Ilomme Pipestem 0t1tO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dilon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch, Koskosing River Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Gologah Optima Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin- Pee Dee New Hlope SNeuse Yadkin Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Red River Sheyenne River Valley City of the North Missouri North Fork, Grand River Haley Red River South Branch of Park River of the North Park River James River Pipestem Creek Jamestown Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas Alum Creek Mahioning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Licking River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoing River Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork Little Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kokosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami River Deep Fork River Birch Creek North Canadian River Little Caney River Wolf Creek Salt Fork of the Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Verdigris River North Canadian River Little River Jackfork Creek Hlominy Creek Beaver Creek Poteau River Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Hlolland Zanesville Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Mufflin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Ilealthy Williamsburg Edmond Barnsdall Canton Copan Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Bartlesville Ponca City Oologah Hardesty Wright City Clayton Skiatook Waurika Wister 1982 753,500 14,300 FQRSWX Earth 1983 335,620 11,300 FQRSWX Earth 1963 153,000 1,470 FARSX Earth 1950 70,000 325 FARS Earth 1967 92,980 1,750 FISRWK Earth 1951 3,660 51 FARS Earth 1974 146,880 885 FRWX Earth 112 1,330 92 1,915 148 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 1975 134,800 348 FRSW Concrete & 93 10,00 Earth 1943 91,200 240 FARSWQ Concrete & 96 5,750 Earth 1978 242,200 13,300 FRSQW Eart&h Rock 165 2,750 1974 63,700 1,010, FQRW Earth & Rock 72 6,620 1968 102,500 727 FRW Earth 93 3,880 1961 273,000 1,325 FRWX Earth 118 1,400 1961 273,000 1,325 FRWX Earth 118 1,400 1966 78,700 580 FAQRSW Earth 83 9,900 1944 104,100 700 FARSWQ Earth 47 5,650 1937 49,700 1,540 FRX 1937 71,700 420 FRX 1938 149,600 NPP FR 1936 88,000 1,350 FRX 1937 54,000 1,800 FRX 1938 203,000 350 FRX 1937 37,400 1,000 FRX 1937 285,000 NPP FR 1936 102,000 NPP FR 1937 65,000 2,270 FRX 1938 87,700 850 FRX 1937 88,500 3,550 FRSX 1936 61,60-0 2,350 FRX 1937 196,000 900 FRX 1973 14,900 98 FRW 1972 145,000 710 FRSQW 1951 26,900 394 FRSWX 1952 11,380 200 FRX 1978 284,500 18,760 FRSQW Earth 65 3,700 Earth 64 5,600 Earth 87 6,300 Earth 48 1.390 Earth 64 950 Concrete 83 824 Earth 74 1,694 Earth 111 2,330 Earth 46 1,220 Earth 56 1.750 Earth 113 775 Earth 45 2,350 Earth 52 1,550 Earth 87 1,950 Earth 71 1,400 Earth & Rock 118 700 Concrete 84 944 Earth 100 1,100 Earth 200) 1,450 1986 92,010 1,820 FSR Earth 1977 59,000 1,145 FSQRW Earth 1948 377,100 7,910 FSI Earth 1983 227,700 4,850 FSQRW Earth 1942 100,700 1,820 FSX Earth 1941 271,400 8,690 FRWX Earth 1950 55,395 880 FRWXS Earth 1974 955,200 13,140 FSQRW Earth 1951 289,000 3,570 FSAX Earth 1976 1,327,160 16,750 FSQRW Earth 1963 1,559,270 31,040 FSNRW Earth 1978 229,500 5,340 FSRW Earth 1969 465,780 3,750 FSQWR Earth 1984 396,900 13,610 FSRW Earth 1984 500,700 10,190 FSQRW . Earth 1977 325,680 10,100 FISQWR Earth 1949 427,480 5,760 FSAX Earth 102 5,250 97 3,190 68 15,140 73 7,730 85 11,865 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10.200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 7,712 101 14,138 143 3,590 106 16,600 99 5,700 A-5 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool lCharacteristics of Damn Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NIPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque * Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenanago Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Hlammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam White Rock TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Barker Belton Rogue Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Applegate River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, WillametteRiver Long Tom River Willow Creek Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopco Creek Tulephoken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxem River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Missouri Cold Brook Missouri Cottonwood Springs Creek Red River Bois de Sioux River of the North Red River Bois de Sioux River of the North San Jacinto Brazos San Jacinto Brazos South Mayde Creek Aquilla Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottllage Grove Eugene Eugene Ileppner Renovo Archbald Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Lawrenceville Ford City Curwensville Wilcox Blanchard White I laven Hlonesdale York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Ilonesdale Huntingdon Slharpsville Uniondale Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence 1981 82,000, 1968 85,000 1942 30,060 1949 70,500 1965 115,000 1941 110,000 1983 13,250 1962 75,000 1970 1,700 1971 68,250 1978 50,010 1952 274,000 1980* 89,000 1940 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 1961 109,610 1960 24,500 1942 28,000 1965 1,180,000 1942 95,300 1941 74,200 1960 52,000 1973 762,000 1966 191,400 1960 12,000 1978 62,000 1978 63,000 1940 133,400 1970 47,640 1973 20,000 1943 254,000 Ilot Springs 1953 7,200 Ilot Springs 1970 8,385 Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Hlillsboro Barker Belton 988 AFIQRSW Gravel 242 1,300 Embankment 975 FINR Earth 319 1,329 1,155 INR Concrete & 114 2,110 & Earth 1,885 FINR Concrete 145 3,352 & Ear 1,865 FINR Rockfill 193 5,100 10,305 FINR Rockfill 49 6,624 & Concrete 96 FRN Roller 160 1,780 Compacted Concrete 160 FRW Earth & Rock 165 1,350 NPP F Earth & Rock 90 1,270 947 FQRSWA Earth & rock 170 4,560 960 FAQRSW Earth & Rock 98 1,775 300 FWV Concrete 137 1,265 & Earth 1085 FRS Eart&h Rock 151 3,100 350 FRW Flarth 143 1,480 790 IFR Earth 131 2,850 90 FARQW Earth 184 1,725 1,730 FRW Earth 100 6,835 80 FRW Earth & rock 234 3.000 NPP F Earth 109 1,255 NPP FRW Earth 83 1,000 1,900 PFAQRW Concrete 1"77 1,877 & Earth 210 FRW Concrete 114 960 & Earth 170 FRW Concrete 162 926 290 FRW Earth 140 1,200 8,300 FRW Earth & Rock 225 1,700 1,910 FAQRW Concrete 68 720 85 FS Earth 77 1,700 470 FR Earth & Rock 140 2,710 680 FR Earth & Rock 122 6,450 480 FRW Earth 154 1,050 NPP F Earth 88 1,420 118 FQRA Earth 90 4,650 450 FARWQ Earth 184 1,610 36 FRWX E arth 41 FRWX Earth 1941 164,500 10,925 FRX Earth 1941 85,500 6,500 FRX Earth 1948 204,500 1983 146,000t) 1945 207,000 1954 1,097,600 NPP FX Earth 3,280 FSX Earth NPP FX Earth 12,300 FIRSX - Earth 127 925 123 1,190 14 9.100 16 14,400 49 61,166 104.5 11,890 27 72,844 192 5.524 * Project became operable for water supply FY 1990 A-6 APPENDIX A (Continued), FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in. Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS (continued) Benbrook Canyon Cooper Lake and Channel Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Plains Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hlords Creek Joe Pool Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Darn, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North I lartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River Trinity Guadalupe Red Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Trrinity Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio James Ohio WASIINGTON Howard A. Hanson Green Mill Creek Columbia Mud Mountain Puyallup WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Ohio Bluestone Ohio Burnsville Ohio East Lynn Ohio R. D. Bailey OhioG Stonewall Jackson L.,WV Ohio Summersville Lake Ohio Sutton Ohio Tygart River Ohio WISCONISIN Eau Galle Chippewa Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadallupe River Sulphur River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek I lords Creek Mountain Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River Fort Worth New Braunfels Cooper Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Grand Prairie Wichita Falls Fort Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Denton Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana West River Jamaica Ottauguechee River North Hlartland Black River Springfield West River Townshend Ompompanoosuc River Union Village Pound River Jackson North Fork of Pound Green River Mill Creek White River Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek uynabdot River West Fork River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Eau Galle IlIa ysi Alleghany Pound 1952 258,600 3,770 FNRXA Earth 1964 366,400 346,400 FRSX Earth 1991 441,200 19,305 FRSWX Earth 1959 842,100 18,700 FRS Earth 1980 244,200 4,400 FRSWX Earth 1952 425,500 7,280- FNRSXA Earth 1948 25,310 510 FARSX Earth 1986 304,000 7,470 FRSX Earth 1972 502,900 15,590 FX Earth 1953 748,200 21,400 FRSW Earth 1954 989,700 23,280 FRSX Earth 1962 212,200 5,070 FRSX Earth 1980 130,800 1,310 FRSWX Rock 1952 396,400 5,440 FRSX Earth 1967 182,940 5,940 FRSW Earth 1963 374,200 4,610 FRSX Earth 1987 1,064,600 29,350 FRSX Earth 1967 507,500 11,460 FRSX Earth 1968 630,400 6,430 FRSX Earth 1965 726,400 7,270 FRSX Concrete & Earth 1957 2,654,300 20,300 FRSX Earth 1961 54,600 1960 71,420 1960 51,067 1961 33,700 1950 38,000 75 FRW 220 FRW 290 FRW 100 FRW NPP FRW Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth 130 9,130 224 4,410 79 28,070 97 10,600 115 16,320 137 12,850 91 6,800 109 22,360 115 8,890 81 19,483 125 32,888 82 6,700 164 6,700 128 40,885 96 7,080 86 13,460 109 14,965 80 26,175 200 15,624 140 24,618 100 18,500 265 915 185 1,520 120 2,940 133 1,700 170 1,100 1963 145,700 310 FAWR Concrete 250 960 & Earth 1979 123,739 2,532 FQR Earth & Rock 257 1,172 1968 11,300 349 FRSW Earth & Rock 122 600 Kanaskat 1961 106,000 1,600 FAS Walla Walla 1942 8,300 225 FR Enumclaw 1953 106,000 NPP FR Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Wested Summersville Sutton Grafton Rock Earth Rock 235 675 125 3,200 425 700 1977 37,540 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 1952 631,000 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 1977 65,400 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 1970 82,500 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 1979 203,700 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 1988 74,650 3,470 FAQAS Concrete 45 620 1965 413,800 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 1960 265,300 270 FNAR Concrete 220 1,921 1938 287,700 620 FNAR Concrete 230 1,921 Spring Valley 1969 43,600 150 FR Earth 122 1,800 A-7 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project IHeight Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (leet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Camanche 2 Cherry Valley 3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar2 New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer2 Oroville 2 Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe-Kailua Area IDAIHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onandaga OKLAIIOMA Altus 4 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Lake Hudson 5 UTAIH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville WASHINGTON Wynoochee San Joaquin Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Mokelumne River Tuolumne Chlerry Creek Alameda Arroyo Del Valle Rio Hondo Eaton Wash Sacramento Yuba River San Joaquin Tuolurnne River San Joaquin Merced River Sacramento Feather River Whitewater Tahchevah Creek Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Housatonic East Branch, Naugatuck River Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook Connecticut Mad River Connecticut Sucker Brook Kaneohe Kaneohe Stream Upper Snake Willow Creek Potomac Savage Upper Bear Creek Mississippi Oswego Red Arkansas Arkansas Beaver Winooski Winooski Winooski Fresno 1948 16,250 NPP Clements 1963 431,500 NPP Sonora" 1956 268,000 475 l.ivermore 1968 77,000 ' 200 Pasadena 1937 960 NPP Marysville 1968 960,000 1,910 Modesto 1970 2,030,000 3,520 Merced 1966 1,026,000 1,900 Oroville 1964 3,539,000 5,838 Palm Springs 1965 960. NPP Trinidad 1954 4,350 NPP Torrington 1964 4,350 NPP Torrington 1962 8,620 NPP Winchester 1963 9,700 10 Winchester 1970 1,480 NPP Kaneohe 1981 3,800 26 Idaho Falls 1979 100,500 364 Western Port 1952 20,000 360 Ilannibal 1962 8,700 NPP Onondaga Creek Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP North Fork, of the Red Riv, 'Altus 1948 152,429 6,260 Grand (Neosho) River Disney 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 Grand (Neosho) River Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,9006 Big Wash Milford 1961 1,200 NPP Jail Branch East Barre 1938 12,050 NPP Waterbury Waterbury 1938 37,000 890 North Branch, Wrightsville 1938 20,300 570 Chehalis Wynoochee River 'Montesano 1972 70,000 1,150 FIR Rock 480 1,200 F Earth 40 20,038 FRS Earth & Rcck 171 2,450 FS Earth & Rock 315 2,500 FRS Earth 223 880 F Earth 82 1,795 FIRPW Concrete 645 2,323 FISP Earth & Rock 565 1,920 FIRSW Earth 770 6,850 F Earth 42 3,610 FWV Earth 92 700 FR Earth 92 100 F Earth & Rock 73 1,200 FR Earth 178 940 F Earth 68 1,160 FR Earth 92 100 FIR Earth 253 1,070 FRS Earth & Rock 184 1,050 F Earth 65 1,450 F Earth FISR Concrete FRP Concrete FRP Concrete & Earth F Earth F Earth FRP Earth FR Earth FSARI Concrete & Earth 67 1,782 98 1,112 147 6,565 90 4,494 34 2,814 65 1,460 158 1.800 115 1,525 177 1,700 A-8 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1 Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool 2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase,N ew Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection. Construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6 Top of power pool. A-9 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO............................ ....................... Arcadia Lake, OK ............. .............. Ardsley, NY ................... ............ Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS ......................................... Atchafalaya Basin, LA............ .................. B. Everett Jordan Damn and Lake, NC........................... Baraga County, M I (Sec 14) .............................................. Batesville Sewage Lagoon................................ B assett C reek, M N ............................................................. Bayou Des G laises, LA ..................................................... Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14) ......... Black River, IHlwy 1111, Wayne Co., MO ...................... Blue River Basin, Overland Park (Indian Creek), KS (Sec 205)................................... Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO.............................. Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL ...................................... Brush Creek, Kansas City, M O ........................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX .................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Safety Assurance.............. ...... Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ......................................... Cannonball River, Grant County, ND (Sec 14).................. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO .......................................... C ascade, IA ........................................... ....................... Cedar Creek, Spaulding, NE (Sec 14)........................... Central and Southern, FL ................................................... Century Park, Lorain, OIl (Sec 103)................................... Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (Sec 14) ....................... Chagrin River, Solon Rd, Chagrin Falls, 011 (Sec 14)....... Charlevouix, East Jordan, MI (Sec 14) ............................... Chaska, MN.......................... ..................... C hatfield Lake, C O .......................................................... Chauvin Bayou, LA (Sec 205)............................................ Chena River Lakes, AK ................................................. Clark Fork River, MT (Sec 14)........................................... Clayton County Bridge Osterdock, IA (Sec 14) ................ Clayton County Road CIX, IA (Sec 14) ............................. Clayton County Road 1620, IA (Sec 14)............ Clayton County Road 1712, AIA (Sec 14) .... ...... Clear Creek, TX ............................................................ Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .................................... Corte Madera Creek, CA...... Cowanesque Lake, PA.......... . ............... Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (Sec 14)...................... Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL .... ..................... Cuyahoga River, Brecksv ille, KD, UII (Sec 14) ............... )ade C ounty, FL .................................. ............................ Dauphin Island, Shoreline, AL ......................................... 1983 1980 1987 1984 1928 1967 1991 1990 1987 1938 1985 1988 1992 1984 1990 1991 1956 1986 1990 1991 1992 1992 1991 1950 1990 1991 1991 1987 1988 1968 1991 1973 1993 1991 1991 1991 1991 1988 1958 1966 1987 1992 1990 1992 1975 1993 Indefinite 1986 Indefinite 3 1990 1989 1987 (2) 2010 1982 1995 1991 1991 1990 1990 1993 1939 1939 1992 7 1985 1986 1989 1989 1991 1988 1992 1992 1992 1991 1991 1990 1974 1993 1979 1993 1993 1993 1993 1991 1990 1991 1993 1994 1998 1993 1995 Indefinite 1993 1994 1992 1997 1992 1992 1999 1991 1995 1991 1990 1995 1994 1994 1989 1994 1993 1993 1993 1993 1997 1995 Indefinite 1990 1994 1993 1993 2038 1994 Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Floodway and Levees Reservoir Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Interior Drainage Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection and Nourishment Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoirs and Levee Streambank Protection Streambank Protection S treanbank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir, channel improvement Local Protection Water Supply Modification Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Shore Protection Shore Protection B.-1 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Demonstration Erosion Control, MS...... ......... Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA............. Drayton Hall, Charleston County, SC (Scc 14) ................ Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel ..................... Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14)......................... East Bow Creek, Wynote, NE (Scc 14) ........................ East End Dauphin Island, AL ....................................... .. East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, IA (Sec 14) East St. Louis and Vicnity, IL - Rehabilitation.................... El Paso, TX .................................. Elizabeth, NJ ................... . ....................... Elk Creek Lake, O R .................................................. ... Elkhorn River, West Point, NE (Sec 205)............................ Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL(Sec 205) .................................. Evansville, IN ........... ........... . ..a.. .. .. ........ Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ..................................... Falls Lake, NC ........................................... Fair Haven, MI (Sec 14) .......................... .......... ...... Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY............................... (Rem ainder) .................................................... Fisher Ferry Road, MS (Sec 14) ......................................... Fletcher Creek, Memphis, TN (See 14).............................. Fort Toulouse, Wetlampka, AL .......................................... Four Rivers Basin, FL..................................................... Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR...................... Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort Section)........................... Gallatin River, (1-90), Gallatin County, MT (Sec 14)......... G reat Bend,K S................................................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS ....................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, M S ....................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS ................................ .... Guadalupe River, CA ......................... .... Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL................................... Hlalstead,KS......................... ... ......... ................... Hannibal, M O .................... ....... ....... ............ ...... Highway 19, Derry, LA (Sec 14)....................................... llighway 495, Natchitoches,Parish, LA (Sec 14) ............... Hills Point Road, MD (Sec 14) ........................................... Hloopersville Road, MD (Sec 14)..................... ... Horn Lake Creek, MS .............................. ............. Humboldt, TN (Sec 205)......... .................................. ....... Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City,MD (Sec 14) ..................... Joe Pool Lake, TX ............................................................. Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Ili(S ec 205)............................. Kahoma Stream, M aui, HI................................................. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Leeve Dist., IL..................... Kirbyville, TX (Sec 205) ............................................... Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR......................................... Lake Elsinore, CA (Sec 205) .............................................. Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (Sec 14)....................................... Lake Pontchartrain, LA ................................................. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ..................... 1985 1989 1993 1967 1986 1992 1993 1992 1988 1971 1972 1971 1989 1988 1939 1985 1973 1987 1963 1963 1987 1991 1991 1966 1987 1991 1991 1988 1986 1987 1987 1992 1988 1991 1989 1994 1994 1989 1993 1993 1986 1989 1975 1989 1986 1980 1989 1981 1993 1992 1967 1987 Indefinite Indefinite 1993 1983 1994 1987 1992 1992 1994 1993 1994 1996 1973 Indefinite 1991 Indefinite 1991 1994 1995 1993 1983 1995 1994 Indefinite Indefinite 1990 1991 1991 1993 1986 1996 1991 1996 1992 1992 1994 1988 1988 1988 1997 1989 1994 1993 1995 1995 1989 1989 1994 1994 1995 1988 1988 1990 1991 1986 1993 1990 1990 1990 1990 1986 1992 1992 1995 1992 1992 2013 1995 l.ocal lProtection Recreation Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shore Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Shorline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection, Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Local IProtection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year lFiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Projct Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Larose to Golden M eadow, LA........................................... 1972 Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205)........ ........................................ 1982 Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA.......................... 1981 Liberty State Park, Levee and Seawall, NJ (Sec 205)......... 1987 Little Calum et River, IN .................................................. 6 1990 Little Dell Lake, U"IT........................................................ 1985 Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14)................. 1986 Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Scc 205).......................... 1985 Lock Ilaven, PA ..................... . ...................... 1991 Long Branch Lake, MO ....................... ...................... 1973 I.oves Park , IL .............................................. ..................... 1991 Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA....... 1961 L.ower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging & Clearing)....... 1985 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (Sec 14)................................ 1992 M artin Creek, Prentiss Co., M S........................................ 1986 Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (Sec 14).. 1989 M aumee Bay State Park, 011I........................................... 1990 Mauvaise Terre, IL........................ ..................... 1985 M ayfield Creek, KY.................................. ........ ........ 1992 McCreadys Point Road, MD (See 14) ............................. 1993 McKinley Park, Milwaukee, WI (Sec 14)..................... 1986 Merced County Streams, CA .............................................. 1985 Middle Hlooper Island, MD (Sec 14) ........................... 1993 Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (See 14) ........................... 1992 Mill Creek, 011 .................................. .......... 1981 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS........................ .................... 1992 Mill Creek, Salem, OR (Sec 14) ......................................... 1990 M illington, TN ..... ........................... ...................... 1990 Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (Sec 14) .................................. 1992 M ingo Creek, OK ........... ................ ........................ 1988 Minnesota River at Belgrade, MN (Sec 14)..................... 1992 Miss.issippi River Channel Improvements (AR, IL, KY, LA,MI, MO & TN) ... ............. 1928 M ississippi River Levees ............................................. 1928 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO ......... 1948 Mound State Park, Moundville, AL................................... 1991 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ............................... 1986 Muddy Creek Cascade, Vaughn, MT (Sec 14) ................ 1992 M udline to Pineville, M S .................................................... 1984 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Dam Safety Assurance)........ 1986 Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (Sec 205)............................. 1986 Muskegon (Duck Lake), MI (Sec 14) .......................... 1990 Muskegon, Memorial Drive, MI (Sec 14)........................... 1986 Muskingham River Lakes, 011 ...................................... 1976 Muskingum River Lakes, OI (Damn Safety Assurance) ....................................... 1982 Nelson Run, Ross Twp., PA (Sec 14) ............................... 1993 New Orleans to Venice, LA ............................................. 1969 Newark, 011 ........................................................... .......... 1976 Nine Mile Drain, Scotts Bluff County, NE (Sec 14)........... 1992 NonconnanhCreek, TN & MS ......................................... 1990 1988 2002 1988 Indefinite 1988 1996 1994 1987 1986 1987 1994 1980 Indefinite 1997 Indefinite Indefinite 1994 1987 1992 1992 1991 1991 1987 1993 1995 1994 1994 1993 1993 Indefinite 1994 1994 1994 Indefinite 1990 1993 1990 1993 1991 1994 1995 1996 1993 (3) (2) 1990 1985 1991 1993 2010 2008 2001 1993 1993 1994 1985 1995 1994 1992 1994 1988 1995 1995 2013 1992 1993 1997 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shore Protection Local Protection Reservoirs S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection S treaInbank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoirs Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Channel Improvement Main Line Levees Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Modernization of Dam Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL, YEAR 1993 Fiscal Ycar Fiscal Placcd in Complctcd or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project North Branch Chicago River, IL............................................ Oates Creck, GA .... ........ ........................................ . Oelwin, Fayette County, IA (Sec 205)' ....................... O'Hlare Reservoir, IL ........................................................ One Hundred Two River, Nodaway Co., MO County Road and Bridge (Sec 14) ............................... Otter Creek, Shannon IHills, AR (Sec 205) .................... Paintsville Lake, K Y ......................................... ........ .. Pajaro River, CA .................. ... .................... Panola-Quitman Item C, MS.......................................... Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE...................... Paw Paw Lake, M I (Sec 205) ........... ............................... Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (Sec 205)................................ Pearl River, MS............................... Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS ........................................... Pelucia Creek, Item 1 A, M S ............................................... Pelucia Creek, Item 2, M S .......................................... Pelucia Creek, Item 3, MS ......................... ....... Pelucia Creek, Item 4, MS ............................... ........ Pennypack Creek, latboro, PA .......................................... Perkins Street Bridge, TIN (See 14)...................................... Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO................................ Petit Jean River, Hlwy 309, AR (See 14)............................. Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) ............. Plum Creek, Norden D)am Road, NE (Sec 14).................... Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (See 14) ................................. Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co., PA ................................... Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ....................................... Porter Bayou, M S (Sec 205) .................. ............. .......... Portersville Bay, Mobile County, AL ................................. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR....................................... Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent)............................. Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (Sec 205).................................. Pt. Leflore, MS............ ............................ R. D. Bailey Lake, W V ...................................... ................. Raritan Bay and Sandy IHook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections ........................................... Ray Roberts Lake, TX ............................................ Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA......................................... Red Lake River, State lwy 32, MN (Sec 14)..................... Red River Basin Chloride Control (Area X) OK and TX......................... ... .................... Red River Below Denison Dam .......................................... Reno Beach, Howard Farms, 011 ....................................... Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14) .............................. Richmond, VA.................................................. Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA................................. Rochester, MN................................. .................... Rock Creek, Pottawatomie County, KS County Bridge (Sec 14) ............................................ Roseau River Duxby Levee, M N ........................................ 1988 1990 1993 1990 1991 1984 1973 1987 1984 1972 1976 1993 1984 1985 1987 1990 1990 1993 1988 1987 1977 1991 1980 1991 1993 1987 1966 1982 1992 1975 1990 1989 1985 1967 1965 1975 1987 1993 1991 1948 1990 1986 1989 1990 1987 1993 1991 1993 1992 1995 1995 1992 1984 1983 1989 1974 1987 1994 1986 1987 1993 1993 1989 1989 1985 1991 1992 1988 1984 1986 1987 1993 1992 1989 1993 1992 1992 1986 1991 1989 1993 1995 1987 1994 1985 1987 1987 1993 1994 1994 1989 1990 1985 1991 1994 1992 1995 1993 1995 1988 1993 1999 1993 1993 1986 1988 Indefinite 1996 1994 1993 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local lProtection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Breakwaters Local Protection Stream bank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Local Protection Indefinite Chloride Control 1995 Levee & Streambank Protection 1992 Shoreline Protection 1987 Streambank Protection 1994 Local Protecuion 1998 Local Protection 1995 Local Protection 1993 1992 Streambank Protection Local Protection B-4 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Running Slough D itch... ................................................... Sabana Grande, PR (Sec 205) ......... .......... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ............................. Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA ......... Sacramento River Flood Control, CA................................. Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, CA........... Saginaw River, M I ....................................................... Salinas River, San Ardo, CA ........................................... San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX .......................... San Luis Rey River, CA.................................................... Sanders Creek, Boscohel, MN (Sec 205)........................ Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (Sec 14) ..................... Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA.................................... San Vincente Arroyo, Silver Spring, NM ........................... Savan G ut, V I (Sec 205) ......................................... ........ Saw M ill River at Ardslay ................................................. Saw Mill Run, Salamanca, NY (Sec 14)............................. Saylersville, K Y ................... .................................. Saylorville Lake, IA .......................................................... Scotts Creek, Newberry, SC (Sec 205)............................... Sewer Line Protection, Valley, AL (Sec 14)....................... Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV ............ ....... ......... Sheyenne River, ND ............................ Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA.............................................. Sicily Island, LA, Levee ............................................. Sidney, N E (Sec 205)....................................................... Silver Creek, Rome, GA (Sec 205)....................................... Sim s Bayou, TX ............................................................ Sims Park, Euclid, 011 (Sec 103)................................... Snake River, Alvarado, MN (Sec 205) ............................... Socastee Creek, Ilorry County, SC (Sec 205).................. Solomon Creek, Ashley, PA (Sec 14) ............................... Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (Sec 14) ................ Solomons Island, MD (Sec 14) ......................................... Sope Creek, Marietta, GA................................................... Souris River Basin, ND ................................................. South Platte River, Logan County Bridge, Proctor, CO (Sec 14)................................................... South Shore Park, Milwaukee County, W1......................... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ................................... Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS....................................... Springbrook Creek, PA ............................................ State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texoma, TX (Sec 14).... State Road and Ebner Coulees, W I..................................... Steele Bayou, M S............................................................ St. Francis B asin ....................a.......... ............................. St. Joseph River, M I (Sec 14) ........................................... St. Paul, M N .................................................................. Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV .......................................... Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14) ................... 1990 1987 1963 1963 1918 1990 1965 1993 1957 1988 1992 1993 1990 1988 1987 1987 1992 1991 1965 1986 1985 1992 1990 1992 1983 1993 1989 1990 1992 1993 1992 1992 1992 1992 1986 1985 1992 1992 1974 1988 1989 1992 1988 1966 1938 1990 1991 1977 1984 1990 1990 1989 1990 1999 Indefinite Indefinite 1996 1979 Indefinite 1993 1996 1996 1995 1993 1994 Indefinite 1988 1988 1989 1990 1989 1990 1995 1997 1977 1994 1988 1986 1989 1992 1999 1992 2000 1994 1994 1991 1992 2002 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 1992 1993 1983 1992 1990 (4) 1986 1996 1993 1993 1993 1993 1990 1994 1992 1993 1993 1994 1990 1994 1993 2004 1999 1994 1994 1988 1986 Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Sewer Line Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection and Nourishment Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection B-5 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Sweetwater River, CA .................................................... Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS........................................... Tallahatchie River, Site 1, MS ....................................... Tama, IA (Sec 205)............................. .............................. Taylors Bayou, TX ......................................................... Taylorsville Lake, KY................................................... Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA ........................... Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5) ............................... Teton River near Choteau, Teton County, MT (Sec 14)..... Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) ............. Threemile Creek, AL ..................................................... Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ...................... Town Brook, Quincy;, MA ...................... ................. Town River Bay, Quincy, MA (Sec 14) .............................. Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK...... ............... Tunkhannock Creek, PA ............................................... Tynes Branch, Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba Co.,M S .................................................................... Upper Gordon Creek, lHlattiesburg, MS ........................ Upper Scioto River, Marion County, 011 (Sec 205)........... Upper Yazoo Projects, M S ....................................... ,......... U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (Sec 14) ....................... U.S. Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (Sec 14) .................. U.S. Hwy 190, Bridge, Sabine River, M erryville, LA (Sec 214)........................................... U.S. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)............. Village Creek, AL ......................................................... Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX............................ Wabasha County lwy 11, MN (Sec 14).......................... W alnut Creek, CA .......................................................... Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV (Sec 14)..... W est Columbus, 0O1H1 ..................................................... Westerly Creek, Colorado........................ ......................... W est Des M oines, IA .................................................... West Nodaway River, Page 1 Rural Water District, Clarinda, LA (Sec 14)............................................. West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) ....................................... West River, New Hlaven, CT (Sec 205) .............................. W est Tennessee Tributaries ............................................. Westwego to Harvey, LA ................................................... Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205)..................... White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) ............................. White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205)...................... White River, Newport, AR (Sec 14).............................. White River, St. Paul, AR (Sec 208).................................... White River, Tripp Sounty, SD (Sec 14) ............................ Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA .............................. Wilamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ..................... Wolf River at 2nd Street, Memphis, TN (Sec 14)................ W yom ing Valley, PA ......................................... . ........... Yalobusha River Mile 7.5, MS ....................... Yatesville Lake, KY......................... 1972 1992 1988 1991 1982 1974 1983 1974 1992 1962 1988 1965 1992 1992 1943 1989 1986 1993 1986 1976 1985 1985 1991 1985 1989 1968 1993 1964 1991 1993 1988 1991 1993 1990- 1991 1960 1991 1983 1984 1984 1988 1988 1991 1980 1938 1988 1983 1993 1964 B-6 1993 1993 1993 1988 1994 1994 1983 1990 1987 Indefinite 4 1992 5 1993 1993 1987 1992 1992 1994 1990 Indefinite 1997 1992 1992 1945 1993 7 1990 1990 1986 1986 1992 1989 1991 1993 1990 1094 1986 1986 1989 1990 1992 1989 1976 1993 1987 1994 1987 2013 1986 1986 1993 1987 1994 1990 1993 1994 1994 2002 1992 1997 1993 1990 1993 Indefinite 2002 1984 1986 1986 1989 1990 1992 1995 Indefinite 1990 1991 1993 1995 Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Riverbank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Bridge Protection Channel Improvement Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Drainage and Flood Control Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Rehabilitation of levee system Streambank Protection Reservoir APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (Sec14)............... 1992 Zintel Canyon, Kennewick, WA.......... ........... '1992 1993 1993 1993 1993 Streambank Protection Local Protection 1 Construction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. Construction work currently underway includes the stabilization of bridge, utility and tributary crossings in the uncompleted portion of the project. 2. Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing channels, levees, pumping stations and other flxood control structures. 3. Remaining recreation unscheduled. Lawsuit was resolved by a Consent Decree Feb 10, 1992. The Decree was for the City of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for the recreation contract and $16,253, 644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. 4. Durham Prong Diversion local support problem. 5. Item 2A temporarily deferred. 6. A maintenance contract for a culvert replacement was completed Nov 1990. 7. Present work is for repair of the levee and pipes. 1B-7 APPENDIX B (Continued), BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Atlantic Coast of Maryland 1990 2043 Deleware Coast Protection, DE 1971 1990 2021 Cape May Inlet to Lower Tup, NJ 1990 1991 2031 Emeryville, Alameda, CA (Sec 103) 1993 1993 1993 Folly Beach, SC 1993 1993 1994 Grand Isle, LA I Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ 1991 1992 2043 Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA 1993 19942 Manatee County, FL 1992 1993 Palmn Beach County, FL (Defray Beach) 1992 1992 Pinnelas County, FL (Indian Shores) 1992 1993 Revere Beach, Revere, MA 1991 1992 1992 Southeast Lighthouse Block Island, RI 1993 1993 Town of North Beach, MD 1993 1994 Woodmont Beach, Milford, Cl' 1992 1993 1 Emergency Repairs due to Hurricane Andrew as per FY 92 Dire Emergency Act authorization. Original authorized project completed in 1991. 2 First of scheduled 5-year Re-nourishment. B-8 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type 1 (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL ClaibomrnLe ock & Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Wasterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock black Rock Channel and Tonawonda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior and Tombighee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Armstead I. Selden Lock and Dam Win. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement) Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam(New Lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No. I Lock and Dam No. 2 William O. luske Lock and Dam S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S.65C Lock S-193 Central and Southern Florida (continued) S-65D Lock S-65E Lock S-308B S-310 81.8 2 , Claiborne, AL 142.32 Camden, AL 254.42 Benton, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA 107.6 4 Chattahoochee, FL 182.8 5 Columbia, GA 182.8 5 Fort Gaines, GA 11.56 Great Bridge, VA 10.66 Deep Creek, VA 33.26 South Mills, NC I.5 3 Berwick, LA 72.53 New Iberia, LA (0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.610 Coffeeville, AL 213.2 10 Demopolls, AL 261.110 Eutaw, AL 327.710 Tuscaloose, AL 347.010 Holt, AL 365.1 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 84 6(K) 30 16 13 Movable 3,160 3 1973 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 9,900 1969 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 14,962 3 1974 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 360 II II 12 Fixed 1,393 193420 360 13 12 11 Fixed 1,436 193420 360) 10 9 10 Fixed 876 1927 360 12 10 11 Fixed 780 1927 360 12 11 11 Fixed 1,140 1928 360 13 II 10 Fixed 916 1930 360 18 14 10 Fixed 984 1931 360 22 11 II, Fixed 950 1938 82 450 33 14 14 Movable 82 450 25 19 13 Movable 82 450 88 18 13 Movable 72 530 3 16 7 52 300) 12 127 52 30) 12 127 16 7 None 12 7 None 12 7 None 45 307 7 97 97 None 36 162 9 9 9 Fixed 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None I10 iI0 110 II( 110 110 110 600 6(K) 600) 600 6(K) 600 90 600 33 40 22 28 64 68 13 13 13 18 19 13 13 Movable 13 Fixed 13 Movable 18 Fixed 13 Movable 13 Fixed 14 14 None 5,924 1957 620 1963 13,371 1963 1932 1940 1941 60.5 9 2(X) 103.1 9 200 88.0 9 200 7.8 9 200 9.7 9 2(X) 6.2 9 2(X) 5.9 9 200(x) 9.4 9. 2(X) 6.9 9 2(X) 9.6 9 2() 9.8 9 2(X)00 46.7 6 100 28.5 6 1() 85.0 6 1(00 12 90 6 50 6 1950 8 175 1913 34.5 6 50 80 50 1914 7 21 200 1,185 1965 1,485 1962 1,832 1962 800 n/a 1,138 1969 1,170 1975 1965 96.6 9 200 47.9 9 2(00 77.0 9 200 8.9 9 2(X) 18.1 9 200 42.7 9 200 12 125 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 2(00 11 9 9 Fixed 275 1915 32.0 8 100 99.0 Browns Landing, NC 40 200 9 12 12 Fixed 229 1917 24.0 8 100 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 40 300 9 9 9 Fixed 220 1935 20.0 8 100 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 30 90 2 6 6 None 1963 8 20 56.0 Frostproof, FL 30 90 6 6 6 None 1964 28.0 3 30 46.0 Avon Park, FL 30 90 6 6 6 None 1967 10.0 3 30 32.0 Sebring, FL 30 90 6 6 6 None 1965 14.0 3 30 25.0 Sebring, FL 30 90 7 6 6 None 1965 7.0 3 30 0.0 Okeechobee, FL 50 60 3.5 7.5 7.5 None 1969 4.0 6 60 16.0 Okeechohee, FL 30 12.0 Okeechohee, F.L 30 38.7 PortMayaca,FL 56 0.0 Clewiston, FL 50 Chicago Harbor, IL Chicago Lock 0.0 Chicago, IL 80 Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam 146.0 Bonneville, OR 86 1TheD alles Lock and Dam 190.0 The Dalles, OR 86 John Day Lock and Dam 215.0 Rufus, OR 86 McNary Lock and Dam 292.0 Umatilla, OR 86 90 90 400 60 600 4 675 66 20 675 88 15 675 110 15 675 75 15 6 6 None 1964 6 6 None 1964 14 14 Movable 1977 13 13 Movable 1980 23 23 None 1939 9.0 3 30 4.0 3 30 5.0 8 100 .5 6 50 .15 21 470 24 Movable 2,680 1938 47.5 27 3(0K) 15 Movable 8,735 1957 25,0 14 250 15 Movable 5,900 1968 76.0 14 250 20 Movable 7,365 1953 64.0 14 250 C.1 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Locks Dams Authorized Chanrnel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, W1 DePere Lock DePere Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukauna Frst Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. I Lock and Dam No. 2 Gulf Intracoestal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Bouef Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Colorado River East Lock West Lock Hudson River. NY Troy Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, 1L LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock MarseiIles Dam Dresden Island Lock and Dam Brandon Road Lock and Dam Lockport Lock Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 148.7 Ashland City, TN 216.2 Old Ilickory, TN 313.5 Carthage, TN 7.1 DePere, WI 7.2 DePere, WI 13.0 DePere, WI 13.1 DePere, W1i 19.2 Wrightstown, W1 19.3 Wrightstown, WI 22.8 Kaukauna, WI 23.1 Kaukauna, WI 23.3 Kaukauna, WI 23.4 Kaukauna, WI 23.6 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 26.4 .Little Chute, Wl 26.5 Little Chute, WI 26.6 Little Chute, WI 27.3 Little Chute, WI 27.4 Little Chute, WI 3(0.7 Appleton, WI 3(0.9 Appleton, WI 31.3 Appleton, WI 31.6 Appleton, WI 31.9 Appleton, WI 32.2 Appleton, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 37.8 Menasha, W I 19.08 Intracoastal City, LA 9. I Spottsville, KY 63.1 Calhoun, KY 92.612 New Orleans, LA 98.312 Harvey, LA 88.012 Algiers, LA 93.3 Morgan City, LA 131.013 Plaquemine, LA 228.512 Port Allen, LA 238.513 Lake Charles, LA 404.113 Freeport, TX 444.8 Matagorda, TX 444.8 Matagorda, TX 153.8 Troy, NY 80.2 Beardstown, IL 157.7 Peoria, IL 231.0 Uitca, IL 244.6 Marseilles, IL. 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 286.0 Joliet, IL 291.1 Lockport, IL 326.5 Chicago, IL 3(0.0 Alanson, M I I l0t 1I 1I010 84 84 36 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 .134 34 84 8() 57 8(X) 26 400 60 400 59 146 9 146 7 146 8 144 9 144 10 144 10 144 10 144 11 9 147 11 144 II 144 14 7 144 10 144 8 144 9 145 10 145 1 ( 144 8 6(X) 11 14 14 14 13 Movable 9,959 1964 12 Movable 801 1959 10 Movable 3,605 1957 13 Movable 1,138 1973 10 12 1936 Movable 986 1929 8 10 1938 Movable 588 1926 9 10 1934 Movable 461 1930 7 9 1898 7 6 1879 7 6 1879 6 6 1903 7 6 1883 Movable 603 1931 1891 6 9 1879 8 6 1879 8 6 1881 1904 Movable 562 1932 7 7 1888 Movable 654 1933 8 8 19(7 Movable 549 1934 6 9 19(X) 7 6 1901 7 6 1884 Movable 691 1940 7 8 1899 Movable 4(11 1937 16 16 None 84 600 12 12 II Fixed 84 6(X) 14 1 5 12 Fixed 75 75 75 75 56 84 75 75 64(0 99 425 109 797 109 1,158 69 8(X) 109 1,198 45 1,205 69 31 7 13 7 13 7 147 147 13 7 3177 None 127 None 137 None 13 None 147 None 147 None 137 None 157 None 1968 118.1 9 150 67.5 9 150 97.3 9 150 71.9 9 1501 5.9 6 1(M 6.2 6 1(1) 3.6 6 11M 0.3 6 1(M 0.2 6 1(1 0.I1 6 101 0.2 6 IW1 0.4 6 I(X) 1.4 6 1(X) 6 IX) 6 1(X) 1.0 6 1(X) (1.7 6 1(X) 3.4 6 10() 0.6 6 I1X) 0.3 6 1(M 0.3 6 1( 5.1 6 1(X) 28.3 6 1( 12 125 482 1956 54.0 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 2(X) 1923 1934 1956 1954 1952 1961 1950 1943 1954 1954 75 1,2(00 5 9 157 15 None 75 1,2(X1) 59 15 7 157 None 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1,495 1917 110 6(X) 10 16 13 Movable 1,066 1939 110 6( 1I1 16 12 Movable 536 1939 I 10 6(X1 19 17 14 Movable 1,280 1933 110(1 6(X) 24 19 14 1933 Movable 819 1933 110 6(XW 22 17 12 Movable 1,616 1933 110 6(X) 34 18 14 Movable 2,373 1933 110 6(X) 40 12 15 None 1933 110 1,1(X 2 14 14 Movable 257 196(0 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 12 150 12 125 16 150 16 150 12 125 12 125 16 2(X) 12 125 12 125 12 125 2.2 14 2(1 77.5 9 3(1 73.3 9 30() 13.6 9 300 26.9 9 3(X) 24 6 14.5 9 3( 5.1 9 3(X 9 3(X) 6.9 9 3(X 4.0 5 30 C-2 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Mumet Lock and Dam London Lock ad Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No. I Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 624 Lock and Dam No. 724 Lock and Dam No. 824 Lock and Dam No. 94 Lock and Dam No. 104 Lock and Dam No, I 24 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 1324 Lock and Dam No. 14 2 Lake Washington Ship Canal Kiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norell Lock and Dam Wilbur D. Mills, Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3) Enmett 0. Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murray Lock and Dam Toad Stck Ferry Lock and Dam Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-JetaTaylor Lock* James W. Trimble Lock andDam N(o. 13) W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Ker Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webbers Falls Lock and Dam Chouleau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock nd Dam No. 26 26 Melvin Price Locks & Dam Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dart No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 31.1 Winfield, WV 67.8 Marmet, WV 82.8 London, WV .8 Ellis Grove, U. 4.0 31.1 42.0 65.0 82.2 96.2 117.0 139.9 157.5 176.4 201.0 220.9 239.9 249.0 Carrolton, KY Lockport, KY Gest, KY Frankfort, KY Tyrone, KY High Bridge, KY High Bridge, KY Camp Nelson, KY Valley View, KY Ford, KY Irvine, KY RavennaK, Y Willow, KY Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Sealtle, WA 10.3 13.3 40.5 50.2 66.0( 86.3 108.1 125.4 155.9 176.9 205.5 256.8 292.8 319.6 336.2 366.6 401.4 421.7 ArkansasP ost,A R ArkansasP ost, AR ArkansasP ost,A R Grady, AR Pine Bluff, AR Redfield, AR Little Rock, AR Little Rock, AR Conway, AR Morrilton, AR Russellville, AR Ozark, AR Fort Smith, AR Fort Smith, AR SallisawOK WebbersF alls, OK Muskogee, OK Inola, OK 56 360 28 18 56 360 24 18 56 360 24 18 12 Movable 834 1937 36.7 9 300 12 Movable 707 1934 15.0 9 3) 12 Movable 707 1934 7.8 9 300 84 600 32 18 11 Movable 130 1973 35.0 9 225 38 145 8 8 15 Fixed 424 1839 38 145 14 8 6 Fixed 400 1939 38 145 13 9 7 Fixed 465 1844 38 145 13 6 6 Fixed 534 1844 38 145 15 10 6 Fixed 556 1844 52 147 14 9 6 Fixed 413 1891 52 147 15 9 7 Fixed 350 1897 52 146 19 II1 6 Fixed 257 1900 52 148 17 11 7 Fxed 362 1907 52 148 17 9 6 Fixed 472 1907 52 148 18 10 6 Fixed 208 1906 52 148 17 10 6 Fixed 240 1910 52 148 18 10 6 Fxed 248 1915 52 148 17 9 6 Fixed 248 1917 80 760 26 33.5 29 Movable 235 1916 28 123 26 166 16 Movable 235 1916 27.0 6 100 11.0 6 100 23.0 6 100 17.2 6 100( 14.0 6 . 100 20.8 6 100 22.9 6 100 17.6 6 100 18.9 6 100 24.6 6 1(X) 19.9 6 100 19.0 6 1X) 9.1 6 l(X 9.6 6 (X) 17.0 34 150 17.0 34 150 110 6(X) 30 16 15 Fixed *4,577 1967 3.0 9 250 I10 6(X) 20 18 14 1967 36.9 9 250 Movable *42,073 1968 110 6(X) 20 18 14 Movable *6,1110 1968 15.8 9 250 II(1 6(X) 14 18 14 Movable *5,745 1968 20.3 9 250 I10 6(X) 17 18 14 Movable *7,455 1968 21.8 9 250 110 6(00 18 18 14 Movable *8,890 1968 17.3 9 250 110 6(1 18 18 14 Movable (3,930 1969 30.5 9 250 110 6(0X 16 18 14 Movable *1,580 1969 21.0 9 250 110 6(0 19 18 14 Movable *1,505 1969 28.6 9 250 110 6(X) 54 18 14 Movable **1.815 1969 51.3 9 250 110 6(X) 34 18 15 Movable '12,480 1969 36.0 9 250 l10 6() 20 18 14 Movable *4,725 1969 26.8 9 250 I 10 6(X) 21 19 14 Movable 7,400 1970 16.6 9 250 110 6(X) 48 18 14 Movable 7,230 1970 30.4 9 250 110 600 30 19 16 Movable 4,370 1970 34.8 9 250 1I10 6(0 21 15 14 Movable 11,690 1970 20.2 9 150 110 6(X) 21 15 14 Movable 1,630 1970 23.7 9 150 185.1 14 Granite City, IL I110 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 202.915 215.8 241.415 273.415 301.215 324.915 343.125 364.215 410.515 437.115 457.215 Alton, IL Alton, IL Cap Au Gris, MO Clarksville, MO SavertonM, O Quincy, IL Canton, MO Keokuk, IA Burlington, IA New Boston, IL Muscatine, IA S110 60 24 19 360 24 16 110 1,200( 24 23 1() 6(0) 15 19 I10 6(K) 15 19 110( 6() 10 18 I110o 6(X) 10 17 1I10 600( 10 15 I10 1,2(K) 38 15 110 6(X) 10 17 100 6(K) 8 16 110 600 9 17 Movable 1,725 1938 Moveable 1160 1990 Movable 1,296 1939 Movable 4,280 1940 Movable 1,024 1938 Movable 1,066 1938 Movable 2,144 1936 Fixed 4,434 1913 Movable 1,350 1937 Movable 921 1939 Movable 1,099 1937 38.5 9 300 40.6 9 300) 32.0 9 3o00 27.8 9, .300 23.7 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 21.0 9 NS 46.3 9 NS 26.6 9 NS 20.1 9 NS 25.7 9 NS C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1993 Locks Dams AuthorinzeCdh annel Miles Width Available , ift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type I (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Lock and Dam No. 15 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No.9 Lock and Damn No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. SA Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. I St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam Upper Lock and Dam Monongahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Locks and Dam No.7 Point Marion. Lock 8 Replacement Morgantown Lock and Dam Hfildebrand Lock and Dam Opekiska Lock and Dam Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 Smithland Locks and Dam Uniontown Locks and Dam Newburgh Locks and Dam Cannelton Locks and Dam McAlpine Locks and Dam Markland Locks and Dam Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam CGreenupL ocks and Dam Robert C. Byrd L&D Racine Locks and Dam Belleville Locks and Dam Willow Island Locks and Dam Hannibal Locks and Damn Pike Island Locks and Dam New Cumberland Locks and Dam Montgomery Island Locks and Dam 482.9 1155 Rock Island, IL 493.115 LeClaire, IA 493.315 LeClaire,IA 522.515 Clinton, IA 556.715 BellevuIeA, 583.015 Dubuque. IA 615.115 Guttenberg. IA 647.915 Lynxville, IA 679.215 Genoa, WI 702.515 Dresbach, MN 714.315 Trempealeau, WI 728.515 Winona, MN 738.115 Minneiska, MN 752.815 Alma, WI 796.915 Red Wing, MN 815.215 lastings, MN 847.615 Minneapolis,, MN St. Paul 853.315 Minneapolis, MN 853.915 Minneapolis, MN 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 41.5 Monessen, PA 61.2 Maxwell, PA 85.0 Greensboro, PA 90.8 Point Marion, PA 102.0 Morgantown, WV 10(8.0 Morgantown, WV 115.4 Morgantown, WV 18.4 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brookport, IL 35.3 Smithland, KY 135.0 Uniontown, KY 204.9 Newburgh, IN 260.3 Cannelton, IN 374.2 Louisville, KY 449.5 Markland, IN 544.8 Chilo, OHl 640.0 Greenup, KY 701.8 Ilogsett, WV 743.5 Letart Falls, 1OH1 777.1 Reedsville, OfIl 819.3 Waverly, WV 854.6 New MartinsvillWe V 896.7 Warwood, WV 926.6 Straton, OH 949.3 Industry, PA 110 110 80 I10 110 I10 I10 110 I10 I10 I1 l10(t 110 110 I10 110 I10 110 56 56 56 56 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 I O10 S10 I10 110 11( 110 110 110 56 Il 1I1 1 00t I1t1O0( 110 I1O1010 IO0 110 1101 1101 11(1 110 1101 I l0t 1101 1101 1101 1101 1101 I56 IO0 IO0 1o0 IO0 IO0 110 56o 600 16 360 16 320 11 6(0 11 600 11 600(X) 9 600(X) 11 600 8 600 9 600 11 6(X)0 8 6(X) 7 6(M( 6 6(X) 9 6(X) 7 6(0 8 60() 12 4(X) 38 4(X) 38 400 25 4() 49 360 9 720 9 360 8 720 8 360 17 720 17 720 20 720 20 360 15 360 19 6(X)0 17 600 21 6(X) 22 600 12 1,200 12 6(X) 12 1,200 12 1,2(X) 22 1,2(X) 22 1,2(X) 22 6(0 22 1,200 16 6() 16 1,200 25 6(0X) 25 1,2(X) 37 6(X)0 37 360 37 1,200 35 600 35 1,2((00 30 6(O 30 1,2(X) 30 6(X) 30 1,200 23 6(O 23 1,200 22 60( 22 1,200 22 6(X) 22 1,200 .20 6(X 20 1,200 2 I1 600 21 1,200 21 6(X 21 1,200 21 6(0 21 60(0 18 360 18 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15s 16 22 18 17 18 18 17 17 22 13 13 14 16 16 16 12 12 20 20 21 21 II 15 18 14 18 I I Movable 1,203 1934 11 11 1922 14 Movable 1,343 1939 13 Movable 1,066 1939 13 Movable 849 1938 13 Movable 1,278 1937 12 Movable 763 1937 13 Movable 811 1937 14 Movable 935 1937 12 Movable 940 1937 13 Movable 893 1936 13 Movable 682 1936 12 MoVable 1,619 1935 13 Movable 1,367 1935 14 Movable 365 1938 13 Movable 822 1930 8. Fixed 574 1932 10 1917 10 Movable 188 1956 14 Fixed 3,584 1963 10.4 9 NS 29.2 9 NS 34.2 9 NS 26.3 9 NS 32.1 9 NS 32.8 9 NS 31.3 9 NS 23.3 9 NS 11.8 9 NS 14.2 9 NS 9.6 9 NS 14.7 9 NS 44.1 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 32.4 9 NS 5.7 9 NS 0.6 9 1(X 3.8 9 1(0 16 Fixed 748 1951 1 2,6 9 310) 16 195321 12 Fixed 670 1907 17.7 9 3(O 12 19(1721 11 Movable 535 1932 19.7 9 3( 11 193221 15 Movable 460 1964 23.8 9 3() 15 1964 10 Fixed 610 192521 5.8 9 3(X) 10 Movable 560 192521/22 11.2 9 3() 15 Movable 410 1950 6.0 9 3(0 15 Movable 530 1959 7.4 9 3() 14 Movable366 1964 7.0 9 3(X) 15 10 Movable 3,978 1929 237 9 3(00 15 10 TemporarLyo ck 1980 15 11 Movable 3(073 1928 35.8 9 3(1 15 11 Temporary Lock 1969 34 12 Movable 3,560 1980 99.7 9 3(0) 34 12 34 12 Movable 3,516 1975 69.9 9 3(X) 34 12 32 16 Movable 2,272 1975 55.4 9 3() 32 16 38 13 Movable 1,965 1972 116.3 9 400 38 13 49 12 Movable 8,627 1961 75.3 9 3(X) 19 11 1921 19 II 193) 50 15 Movable 1,395 1963 95.3 9 3() 50 15 1963 9 300 45 15 Movable 1,756 1962 95,2 9 300 45 15 1962 45 15 Movable 1,287 1962 61 8 9 3(1 45 15 18 15 Movable 1,132 1992 41.7 9 3(X) 18 15 37 15 Movable 1,202 1970 33.6 9 3(X 37 15 37 15 Movablel,206 1969 36.4 9 3() 37 15 35 15 Movable 1,128 1973 35.3 9 1,1X)O 35 15 38 17 Movable 1,098 1972 36.0 9 3( 38 17 17 18 Movable 1,306 1965 29.9 9 3(0 17 18 17 15 Movable 1,315 1961 227 9 3( 17 15 16 15 Movable 1,379 1936 18.4 9 300 16 15 C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (mfiles) (feet) (feet) Daschieldss Locks and Dam Emsworth Locks and Dam 967.7 Glenwillard, PA 974.8 Emsworth, PA !I 1I06t 56 It0 56 6(0 t0 13 360 10 13 6(X 18 17 360 18 16 18 Fixed 1,585 1929 7.1 9 300 18 13 Movable 1,717 1921 6.2 9 300 13 Okeechobee Waterway, FL, St. LSucieL ock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W. P. Franklin Lock and Control Struclure Old River LA Old River Lock Ouchita and Black Rivers, AR & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (B lack River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) 1. K. ThatcherLock (Ouachita River) Fetsenthal Lock (Ouachita River) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock I Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Waterway Lock I Lock 2 Lock 3 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snake River, WA lee Harbor Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam St. Mary's River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock 15.1 Stuart, FL 50 250 13 14 78.0 Moore Have, FL 50 250 2 10 93.6 LaBelle,FL 50 250 ! I 12 121.4 Fort Myers,FL 56 4181 3 14 304.0 Simmesport, LA 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 281.7 Calion, AR 226.8 FeLsenthal, AR 29.417 Pearl River, LA 40.717 Bush , LA 43.917 Sun, LA 43.8 Marksville, LA 86.5 Alexandria, LA 141.0 Colfax, LA 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 9.7 Pasco, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 107.5 Pomeroy, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 12 Movable 170 1941 II None 1953 11 Movable 104 1937 14 Movable 1,150 1965 75 1,2(00 35 II 11 None 1963 84 6(X) 30 18 14 Movable 450 1972 84 600 18 18 13 Fixed 400 1972 84 600 12 18 13 Movable 350 1984 84 6(X 13 18 13 Movable 350 1984 310 26.7 10 310 15 10 310 11 10 10 None 10 None 10 None 15.1 8 80 15.6 8 90 15.6 8 90 7.9 8 90 12 125 92.2 9 100 106.2 9 100 50.3 9 100 55.2 9 o100 1951 11.1 7 80 1951 3.2 7 80 1951 13.2 7 80 84 685 36 22 13 Movable 550 1984 84 685 24 23.5 15 Movable 300 1987 84 685 31 25 18 Movable 360 1991 86 6(X) 4 13 86 675 1(0X0 15 86 675 101 15 86 . 675 100 15 86 675 98 15 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, 80 800 22 31 MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, I 10 1,200 22 32 MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, 80 1,350 22 24 MI 47.0 Saull Ste. Marie, 80 1,350 22 24 MI 13 None 20 Movable 2(0 Movable 20 Novable 20 Movable 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 44.2 9 2(X) 74.3 9 200 116.5 9 200 1961 1.5 13 120 1961 1970 1975 1969 1943 1968 1914 1919 41.6 14 250 37.2 14 250 38.0 14 250 28.1 14 250 27 Savannah, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock andDam 187.2 Augusta, GA 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY 1 8 Kentucky Lock and Dam 22.4 Gilbertsville, KY 110 600 56 11 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam AuxiliaryLock 206.7 tlamburg,TN 110 6(0 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 Main Lock 206.7 lamburg, TN 110 1,(XX) 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS Gainesville Lock and Dam Aliceville Lock and Dam Columbus Lock and Dam Aberdeen Lock and Dam Lock A and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Lock C and Spillway Lock D and Spillway Lock E and Spillway Bay Springs Lock and Dam Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock 16.2 9 90 184.3 9 300 52.7 9 300 52.7 9 300 49.1 Gainesville, AL 110 6(0 36 15 15 Movable 15,460 1978 49.1 9 300 89.8 Aliceville, AL 110 6(0 27 15 15 Movable 14,790 1979 40.7 9 300 117.6 Columbus, MS I10 600 27 15 15 Movable 10,040 1981 27.8 9 300 140.4 Aberdeen, MS 110 6(0 27 15 I5 Movable 10,640 1984 22.8 9 300 154.1 Amory, MS 10 6(00 30 15 15 Movable -- 1985 13.7 9 300 159.3 Smithville, AL I10 6(X) 25 18 18 Movable -. 1985 14.7 9 300 174.0 Fulon,M S 110 6(00 25 18 18 Movable -- 1985 7.4 9 300 181.4 Fulton, MS I10 610 30 18 18 Movable ** 1985 8.3 9 300 189.7 Belmont, MS I10 60(K) 30 18 18 Movable 1985 5.2 9 3(00 194.9 Tupelo, MS 110 6(X 84 18 18 None 10,640 1985 64.5 9 300 259.4 Florence, AL 110 6(X) 94 13 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 15.5 9 300 259.4 Florence, AL 60 292 94 11i 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 15.5 9 300 274.9 Florence, AL 110 600 48 13 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 74.1 9 300 C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Locks Dams Authorized ChamnIn Miles Width Available Lift at , Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Nornil Length Year Length D)epth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Auxiliary Lock 274.9 Florence, AL 6(0 4(X) 48 15 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 74.1 9 300( Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennesssee Rivers. AL and MS (continued) Guntersville Lock and Dam Main Lock 349.0 Gunlersville, AL 110 600 39 13 13 Tainter 3,837 1965 75.7 9 30( Auxiliary Lock 349.0 Gunlersville, AL 60 400 39 13 12 Tainler 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 Nickajack Lock and Dam 424.7 hObattanoogTaN, I 10 6(1 39 13 11 Tainter 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 Chickamauga Lock and Dam 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 60 36(0 49 10 14 Tainter 5,654 1940 58.9 9 31X) Walls Bar Lock and Dam 529.9 Breendenton, TN 60 36(1 58 12 12 Tainter 2,646 1942 72.4 9 3(X) Fort Loudon Lock and Dam 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 12 Tainter 3,687 1943 49.8 9 3(X) Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 400 54 13 13 Tainter 1,072 1963 38.2 9 300X)19 Willamette River at Willamelte Falls, OR Lock No. I 26.0 Oregon City, OR 4(0 210 20 6 8 None 1872 6 150 Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City, OR 4(0 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 3 26.11 Oregon City, OR 40 21(1 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 4 26.0 Oregon City, OR 4(0 210 10 6 8 None 1872 .4 Guard Lock 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 21(1 10 6 8 None 1872 23.6 6 Fixed; crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable; includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2 Above mouth of Mobile River. 3 Includes length of earth dikes. 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River. , 5 From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6 Above Norfolk, VA. 7 With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 8 From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 9 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 10 From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL 11 From mouth of St. Johns River. 12 Above Head of Passes. 13 From New Orleans, LA. 14 Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position, 15 Above the Ohio River. 16 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. 17 From mouth of West Pearl River. 18 Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 19 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 20 Dates shown represent replacement structures. 21 Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 22 Dam was rebuilt in 1959. 23 Old 110' X 358' lock replaced in 1957. 24 Inoperable, caretaker status September 7, 1982. 251 noperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. 26 Lock and Dam 26 has been removed and replaced by Melvin Price Locks and Dam * Includes length of left and right embankments ** Includes length of left embankment APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscdl Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Ilarbor, Guam (Sec 107) .......... AIWW - Replacement of Federal I Iwy Bridges in NC..... Aquadilla IHarbor, PR (Sec 107) ......................................... Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA.... ........ Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................................ Bayou LaBatre, AL .......................... Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA........................... Brazos Island Harbor, TX. .................. Canaveral Hlarbor Deepening, FL ....................................... Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ....... . Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.).................... Charleston H arbor, SC ..................................................... Cleveland Harbor, OIl (NCll/Pier 34).............................. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Ham m ond, O R .............................................................. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ....................................... Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ (37' proj)). Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ (40' proj),, Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ............. ..... . ................................ Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VW .......................... Freeport HI arlxr, TX. . .. ..... ... G rays Ilarbor, W A .................................... ...................... Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) M onongahela River, PA............................................. Gulfport Ilarbor, MS ......................... IH elena IH larbor, AR .... ..................... ..... Hlempstead IHarbor, NY ................................ Illinois W aterway Four Locks............................................ Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY................... Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA (Sec 107) ........ K odiak H arbor, A K ............................................................. Laupahoehoe larbor, Hawaii, III ....................................... Lock and Damns 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA .......... Lock and Dam 13, IL .................................................. 1987 1974 1993 1987 1987 1993 1985 1992 1993 1967 1987 1988 1992 1991 1972 1987 1992 1984 1988 1987 1990, 1986 1991 1989 1992 1993 1986 1993 1993 1988 1989 1993 1989 1989 1986 I 2000 1995 1990 1993 1992 1994 1995 1994 Dredging and breakwater Replacement of existing bridges Breakwater Deepdraft channel deepening Jetty realignment and dredging Dredging New larger lock Enlarging and Deepening Deep Draft Channel to 42 foot depth 1994 Navigation Channels 1968 Indefinite Deferred anchorage construction 1989 Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet 1994 Dredging and channel wideningand deepening 1993 Recreation Navigation 1990 1988 1992 1988 1993 1988 1938 Indefinite 1994 1988 1993 Construction of support structure Dredging Dredging Dredging 1994 Protection of a National Natural Landmark 1988 Dredging 1994 Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation 1995 Navigation channel widening and deepening 1995 Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & darn 7 1994 Deepen Channel 1994 New Slackwater Harbor 1994 Removal of derelect barges 1996 Major rehabilitation of locks and dams 1995 Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening 1993 Channel Dredging 1996 Breakwater and navigation channel widening 1988 Breakwater 1999 Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems 1996 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam D-1, APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Lock and Dam 15, IL................ ......... Lock and Damn 16, IL....................... ........ ........................... Lock and Dam 17, IL .................................................... Lock and Damn 18, IA................................................. Lock anmid Dan 20, MO ................................................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR.. Melvin Price Lock and Damn, MO...................................... Miamuni Harbor Channel, FL........................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and MO ............................... Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ....... . ............. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA NE, KS and M O ..................... ........ ............. Mountain Point Breakwater, AK ........................................ Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal W aterw ay) ....... ...6. . ... . ................. . .. .................... Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI ............................................ New York Harbor, NY and NJ ..................................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) ........................ Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) ................... Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA................. Oakland Harbor, CA ..................................................... Olhnsted Locks and Da-n, IL & KY ................................ Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA............................... Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8 M onongahela River, PA................................................ 1993 1934 1990 1937 1988 1939 1988 1937 1986 1963 1974 1991 1910 1987 1992 1993 1984 1985 1976 1966 1987 1987 1987 1992 1964 1986 Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua River, ME and NIl ........ 1989 Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA........ 1974 1970 1990 1996 Major rehabilitatino of lock and dam 1994 Major maintenance of lock and damn 1993 Major maintenance of lock and dam 1993 Major maintenance of lock and dam 1994 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and )mn 2000 Locks and dams 1997 Replacemnent 1995 Navigation Channels & Turning Basin 2000 Regulating works 1987 2 Indefinite 3 Dredging 55-foot channel 1993 1999 Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses from construction and operation of Missouri River Bank Stabliazation and Navigation Project 1993 Breakwater construction 1994 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 1987 1987 Breakwater repair Incremental Indefinite Collection and removal of drift 1967 Indefinite Deferred anchorage const. 1989 Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet 1989 Indefinite Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 feet 1997 Channel deepening and widening turning basin 2006 Navigation 1984 Indefinite Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment 1994 Replaces existing 56x360' lock chamber with new 84'x720 chamber 1992 1992 Dredging (widening channel) 19844 Indefinite 5 Lock and hdamcounns truction. Channel improvement and realignment D-2 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1993 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project. Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Richm ond I larbor, CA ....................................................... Robert C. Byrd Locks and D)am, Ohio River..................... Rudee Inlet, VA .............................. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ............. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA ........................... San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)...................................... Savannah I larbor Deepening, GA ....................................... Savannah hlarbor W idening, GA ........................................ Schinnecock Inlet, N Y .............................................. Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel)................................. Tenn River, Decatur Morgan County Port, AL................... Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ...................................... Tombigbee River, Columbus Port, MS (Sec 107) ............. Tongue Point, OR ..... ............... .......... Toussant River, Caroll Twsp., 011(Sec 107).................. Ventura Harbor, CA ..............a.......................................... .. 1985 1985 1990 1986 1991 1971 1993 1990 1990 1976 1988 1987 1987 1989 1991 1993 1992 1991 1989 In 1987 1990 W allisville Lake, TX ..................................................... 1967 Winfield Lock and Dams, Kanawha River, WV................. Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME ................................. 1990 1992 1 Walter Jones and Joseph P. Knapp completed; Core Creek is under design. 1997 Channel deepening and turning basin 1999 Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam 1991 Dredge 7 foot channel 1998 Deep draft channel, widening and deepening 1994 Dredging and breakwater 2000 Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1994 Channel deepening 1992 Widening channel 1993 Dredging and repair of jetties 1987 Dredging 1989 Channel excavation definite Dredge 50 ft outbound element and dredge to 55 feet 1989 Navigation channels & turning basin 1992 Dredging 1992 Dredging 1994 Dredging; breakwater and groin construction 1997 Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1997 Construction of new lock 1993 Improvement Dredging construction; lHobucken and Fairfield have been funded for 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. 3 Awaiting further PCA's to extend project to Baton Rouge, LA, and to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful operation in 1984. Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. and Lock and Dam No. 3 in 1992. Construction was initiated on Lock and Dam Nos 4 and 5 in 1991. 5 Schedule for completion of entire project is indefinite. HIower, the project Is scheduled for opening to 9-foot navigation upon completion of Ltxocks and Dams 4 and 5 in January 1995. D-3 APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. FIeature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project 2leight Length Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet)1 Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type (feet) (feet) Albeni Falls,. ID Pend Oreille Allatoona Lake,GA Etowah Barkley Dam & Cumberland Lake Barkley, KY KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR White Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpel), SD Missouri Blakely Mountain Ouachita Dam-Lake Ouachita Bonneville LAD Columbia Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, Mountain Fork OK Buford Dam, Chattahoochee Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake White AR & MO Clarence Cannon Salt Dam Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Center lillLa ke, Caney Fork TN Cleah'am L&D, TN Cumberland Chief Joseph Dam Columbia (Rufus Woods Lake),WA Cooper River, Santee Charleston larbor, SC Cordell lull L&D, Cumberland TN Cougar Lake, OR S. Fork McKenzie Dale Hollow Lake, Obey TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, Arkansas AR DeGray Lake, AR Caddo Denison Dam(Lake Red Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR. North Santiam including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam N. Fork, & Reservoir, Clearwater ID Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Fort Cibson Grand (Neosho) Lake Fort Peck Lake, Missouri MI Fort Randal Dam Missouri (Lake Francis Case), SD Garrison Dam Missouri ( Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavins Point Dam Missouri (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Middle Santiam Lake,OR, including Foster Lake, OR Greers Ferry Little Red Lake, AR IHarry S. Truman Osage Dam & Res. Hartwell Lake, Savannah GA & SC Hlls Creek Lake, Middle Fork OR Wilamette Ice Harbor L&D Snake (Lake Sacajaweas), WA J. Percy Priest Stones Dam & Reservoir, TN J. Stron Thurmond Savannah Dam & Reservoir GA & SC Jim Woodrtff Dam Appalachicola (Lake Seminole), F., GA & AL John Day LAD Columbia (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA John 11. Kerr Roanoke Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Keystone Lake, Arkansas OK NewportWA I,153,000 1952 1955 Carters villeGA 670,000 1950 1950 Frand Rivers, 2,082,(o00 1964 1966 Eureka Springs, 1,952,0(0) 1963 1965 Chamberlain,SD 1,883,00(0 1964 1965 Mr. Pine, AR 2,768,000 1953 1956 Bonneville,OR 537,0() 1938 1938 Broken Bow, 1,368,230 1968 1970 OK Buford, GA 2,554.000 1956 1957 Mountainllome 5,408,000 1952 1953 AR Perry, MO 1,428,000 1983 1985 Carters, GA 472,756 1975 1975 Lancaster,TN 2,092,000 1948 1951 Ashland City, TN 104,(XXO 1952 1958 Bridgeport, WA 593,(X) 1955 1956 42,600 74,(00 130,000 112,000 468,000 75,000 1,145,700 10(),0X)00 86,000 340,(X)00 58,0(X0) 50(,000 135,000 36,(X4 2,457,384 St. Stephen. SC 2,56(0,000 N/A 1985 84,000 Carthage. TN 31().9(X) 1973 1974 Blue River, OR 219,0(X 1963 1964 Celina, TN 1,706,000 1943 1949 Dardanelle, AR 486,2(X) 1969 1965 Arkadelphia, AR 831,9(X) 1969 1972 DenisonT,X 5,194,163 1944 1945 1(1(0(1 25,0(X) 54 ,(X) 124,0(0) 68,0(0) 70,(X)O 42,600 NI C 90 1,055 74,000 FPRW C 190 1,250 130,000 NIFR CE 157 9,959 112,000 FPSR CE 228 2,575 468,000 FPRIW E 95 10,570 75,000 FTW E 235 1,100 1,145,700 NPR C 122 2,690 1 00,(K)0 H 5 WSR E 225 2,750 86,0(10 NFPW E 192 5,400 340,00(0 FPR C 258 2.256 58,(XX(K) FNPRSW CE 138 1,700 500,000( FPRW ER 450 1.950 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 36,0(10 (PR C 75 801 2,457,384 PIR C 230 5,998 84,(XX) NPW CE 86 876 10(),(00 NPR CE 93 1,306 64,600 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 54,(X)O FR C 2(0 '1,717 124,(KK) NPR C 68 2,683 108.(000 FNPRS E 243 3,400 175.0(X) FPRSN E 165 17,2(00 Mill City, OR 461,0( 1953 1954 118,(1) 118,0(00 NFPRI C 382 1,528 Oroflno, ID 3,453,()O0 1972 1973 4(X),(000 Eufaula, OK 3,825,400 1964 1964 Ft. Cbson, OK 1,284,400 1949 1953 Glasglow, MT 18,909,(XX) 1938 1944 Lake Andes, SD 5,574,.000 1953 1954 Riverdale, ND 24,137,() Yankton, SD 504,0(X) Sweet Home, OR 491.0(X) fleber Spings Warsaw, MO Hartwell, GA Oakridge, OR Pasco, WA Nashville, TN Augusta, GA 2,844,.00( 5,202,(10 2,842,700( 356,0(0 417,0(X) 9(1,(XX) 45,000 185,250 320,0(0) 1954 1956 430,(X). 620,(XX) 7 PNFR CG 717 3,30(1 90,(01O FNPS CE 114 3,200 67,500 4 CE 110 2,990 185,250 NFPRIW E 251 21,026 320,000 NFPRIW E 165 10,700 43(0,(KK) NFPRIW E 210 11,300 1956 1957 1(X),00(0 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 1967 1967 1(.0() 100,()(0 PFNIR C 340 1,380 1962 1964 1982 1982( 3 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1961 96,000 160,(K) 344,(X)( 30,0(X 603,000 652,0(X) 1967 1970 28,0(0) 2,900,000 1952 1953 280,0(X) Chatlahoochee, FL 367,3(1) Rufus, OR 1957 1957 30,(KK) 2,5(0,(X)0 1968 1969 2,160,()00 Boydton. VA 2,750,300 1952 1953 204,000 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS CE 204 17,880 30,000 NFTPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CG 130 2,790 28,(000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 280,100 NFPRSW CE 2(00 5,680 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,9(0 204,000 FPRW CE 144 22,285 Tulsa, OK 1,672,613 1964 1968 70.(XX) 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,60() E-1 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE "PROJECTS'INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Flood Control and/or ... otal Nay. Feature' S Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Hleight Lngth Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY In FY (KW) (KKWW) ) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Lake Greeson. AR Little Missouri Laurel River. KY Laurel Libby Dam, Lake Kootenai Koocanusa, MT Little Goose L&D Snake (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Point Middle Fbrk Lake including Willamette Dexter Lake. OR Lost Creek Lake. Rogue OR Lower Granite Snake L&D. WA Lower Snalek Monunmental L&D (Lake Hlerbert G. West), WA McNary L&D Columbia OR & WA Millers Ferry Alabama � L&D, AL Mississippi Delta Region. LA (Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion) Mississippi Nanpil River Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, FSM New Melones Stanislaus Lake, CA 4 Norfork Lake. AR North Fork & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Missouri. Oahe), SD & ND Old Htickory L&D, Cumberland TN Ozark-Jeta Arkansas Taylor L&D. AR Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Richard B. Russell GA and SC Robert F. Henry Alabama LA D. AL Robert S. Kerr Arkansas L&D and Reservoir. OK Sam Rayburn Dam Angelina & Reservoir. TX St. Mary's River, Great Lakes Mil SnettishamrnA. K 5 Speel Stockton Lake, MO Sac Table Rock White Lake, AR & MO Tenkiller Lake. Illinois' OK The Dalles L&D Columbia (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George Chattahooche L&D. GA & FL Webbers Falls Arkansas L&D. OK West Point Chattahooche Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Wolf Creek Dam Cumberland (Lake Cumberland). KY Murfreesboro,AR 4(t7,9(00 London, KY 435,6()(1 Libby, MT 5,809,()0(0 Starbuck, WA 565,(1M Lowell, OR 483,0(X1 Trail, OR 465,(10 Pomeroy. WA 484,0() Kahlotus, WA 376,0(1) 1950 1950 25,500 1973 1978 61,0(X) 1972 1975 525,0(X) 197(0 1970 801,0(1) 1954 1955 135.(KX)1 1977 1977 49,0(X1 1975 1975 810,(X10 1969 1969 810,0(10 Umatilla, OR 1,550,000 1953 1954 980,000 Camden, AL 331,8090 1969 1979 75,0(X1 Braithwaite, LA Pohnpei, FSM 1991 1987 1988 2,000 Oakdale, CA 2,4(X),000 : 1978 1979 3(,0(X)1 Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hlendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA Augusta, GA Benton, AL Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Marie Juneau, AK Stockton, MO Branson, MO Gore, OK The Dalles, OR 1,983,000 23,337,1X) 545,0(1X) 148,4(1) 318,500 1,026,244 234 ,2(3 525,7(1 3,997,600 352,4(X)(1 1,674,(X)0 3,462,000 1,230,8)00 53,0(X) Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 Wevbbers Falls, OK 170,100 1943 1944 1959 1962 1954 1957 1969 1973 1951 1954 1984 1984 1972 1975 1970 1971 80,550 595,0(X) 1(X),0(K) 14.000 340,(XX)1 68,0(X) I 1I(1, (X) 1965 1966 52,(XX8) 1855 1952 18,4()(1 1973 73,7(0) 1969 1973 45,2(1) 1958 1959 2(.(XX)1 1952 1953 40,1(i) 1957 1957 1,806,800 1963 1963 130,(KX)1 1970 1973 60,000(3 West Point, GA 604,5(8) 1975 " 1975 ' 73,375 Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 3(0,000 Janmestown, KY 6,089,000 195(0 1952 270,(X)0 25,500 FPRW C 183.5 941 61,000 [PRW R 282 1,42(1 84(1,0()0 11R C 420 3,055 810.() NI'RI CG 165 2,655 135,(X)0 N-HRI CE 243 3,381 49,(1(1) DI'PISWR CE 810,(X)0 NPRIF CG 810,00) NPRI CG 980,00)0 NPR CG 75,0(0) NPRW CE 345 3,6(0 146 3,200 135 3,8(00 181 7,365 90 11,380 W CE 38.5 371 2,(X)0 P C 17 70 3(1)01 FPRW ER 163,00(0 H S C 595,00(X) NFPRIW E 100,I( XX) NPR CE S(10,000 NPR C 14,(1X)0 PR C 685,(X3 NPR CE 68,(XX) NPRW CE S1(01, (xx MRII E 625 1,560 216 2,624 245 9,300 98 3,605 58 2,480 220 892 195 4,524 101 14,962 75 7,230 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 18,4(X) N' Control Gate 73,7(K) P C 6 18 338 45,2(00 FPRW CE 128 5,1(X) 2(X),(Xx) H'R CE 252 6,423 40,(000 F1P E 197 3.000(X 1,806,8(X) NPR CR 300 8,875 130,(XX) NPRW CE 114 13,585 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,695 270,(10 ITR CE 258 5,736 ITotal of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on May 1, 1982. No other units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will be out of service for repairs and modifications until late 1995. 4Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 5Being operated by the Alaska Power Administartion 6Formerly Clarks Hill Lake 7 Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in 1990. E-2 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Ileight Length Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet) 1 Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Nomenclature for Project Functions D)--Debris Control P--Power F--Flood Control R--Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I--Irrigation S-Water Supply N--Navigation W--Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-3 APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Namieplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled NaeltCpci Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse. OR and WA......................................... 1974 1981 1996 4 PR 558,200 558,200 Chief Joseph Additional Units. W A.......... ................................................ 1973 1994 1994 PIR 2,2373,160 2,525,000 5 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO....................................................1966 1985 1997 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Hlarry S. Tniman Dam and Reservoir,I Osage River, M O............................................................................... 1965 1982 1 1994 FRPW 160,000 160,000 New Melones Lake, CA 2................................................ ..................... 1966 1979 Indefinite I)FIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC ................................................................................ 1975 1985 1996 FRP 600,000 600,000 Cooper River, Charleston llbr, SC 3......................................................... 1977 1985 2001 NW DP 84,000 84,000 Snettisham, A K ........................................................................................... 1967 1989 1993 P 73,700 27,000 KEY DI) NP RS W Redevelopment Flood Control Irrigation Navigation Power Recreation Water Supply Fish and Wildlife 1 Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on May 1, 1982. No other units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will be out of service for repairs and modifications until late 1995. 2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of unscheduled recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. 3 Remaining construction consists of a two-lane bridge and highway facility which the SC HWY Dept has an option to initiate construction on until May 2001. 4 Major repair to Reregulation Dam Stilling Basin and Outlet Channel scheduled for FY 96-97. 5 Limited by hydraulic factors. Units 1-27. F-I - -- -- ------ --- ------ - --- -- . '. I . - I - - .. . - DAMAGES PREVENTED . I - . .'.-. ................... ...... .....-....................................... ....-.................-.:... .......,............................. ......................... ................-.. '.. .......-.......................... .................................. ....... :.:...:..:.:...:.:...:...:..:..:...:....:.:.....:..:...:....:...:....:. .:...-:.:...-:-....:-.... .- .-.-..-..-...-. :.-:. .--. :..-..-...-:.. -. -:..--:...--.:..:.---:...:--..:.:---...:*:-"--.. * :-" :-. .-.-,'-..-.*.:*..--*:"..--",.*..-.*--..-,*.. *.-I*, .-*,.."-,."-*."-. *.-,..-.*-.,-.,-.,-.,...,.-*.-.*..-:..*.-.:-.:..:-.:-.:..:-.:..:.-:.-:.-:.-:.-.:-.:-.:-.:-.:.-:.-:.-:.-:.-.:-.:-.:-.,-.-".".".,*.*"I.... .'..'....-' ...'.......'...'..'".'*..*. .'"'..*..'' .,..:'.'....-..'.:. '.-.*..':..-.'*.:.-.'.'.,'.:, " ,.* .-'. .'':-'., ..'.-,. ,' .: ,'..".- *.:'.....-'.':..'..'- '..:...'.*-..':.....-''....:..'-'.......:"'-. .....:''......:'...-."..'.,.*..-*..'.*..'.*'.. ..*.*..*..''.-,... .,.''.-...,**.'.*. ....-' ..'..,.,.'-. ..**..'.'.. ....-.*.'*.. ....* .-*.-..*....'.'..'-... ....'..''......'..*'."....'....'..-.,...''.:.'.... ...'-.'...'.......'*..-.....'.'....'-..*..'. .'-......'*'........*'..'...-.. .. ,..*...-...*..'..-..*..*.... -'..,..'-..,..'......**... .."......-....,....,....,....*.....'....*.....'....*.....'....'....*.....*.....'....".......*.....'....*.....'....'....'....'...' ...'...*....'....*....*....*....'..'..'.'.*.'.*.*.'.*.'.'.'.'.*.'.'.'.'., 3 5 ......,..............,.'..',.................................-......................"...............%......... ...............-.. ... ....-. ... ......' ..... ......'.....- .-.'-....'..... :.,.*..*-. ...,. ...:- . .. ..-..-....:.'...*..-- .-...-.:.. ...--.-.-.-:-....---..--.-....-.:-..-.--......-.:-...--,-.-..*....-,.:.--.- ..- ....,*-...,:-*: .....-,.. .-.*..: ::..........--..:.-,..,.... .....-.....:.-........ -.....:,......*....-...:...........-,...-...........-... .-*............-...:.....,.-.. ....:-......... ..*......:.... .. ....*...-'.. ..... '..-*... .*,........ -.... ..........--............-............. .-....- ..*......*..-.... .......... .-.....:.........--.......:........-..-......:.......*...- ......:..... . -. -.........."..:....-....*..*..... ..". ... -. -.'.. ..*....: .. ..-....-*.*.........:...-..*1. ..-...........: 1-.:.......-...0.-.....l-..*:....:'..-.....-..--1-.. -.. ...:.,:... ....-.*:- ....--..... ..-::.... -...l. --....-.... .,. ........:.".."..-.....-.*.--..%..."...:..-. -,. ..- .. .--... .....-.:.-... .. -*...-.. -.......-.-:..*..-.. *..-1........-.,...:.. ..-.*.1...-...-... ...:. .1... ......--. .,....1.. :... .-.......-..1.......:.1.*.. .-.....-......- -.-:- .....*.. ..."...:.-.l:...' .--....--.. -..*':.....'.:.. ..-..*.... ...'-:.-..'... .. ........-.-........-......-...-..........-..,...-.................-............-.....-.......... ........-... ..........-.............-.............-.............-.............-..............-.............-............-..........:..-.........:..-............-....:....:%. ......::-...-.-...:...-.....:..:....-...:-:.-.....:.-:.....-.:-.-:.. .:--..-.:..-:-..-.:...:.-.--..::..-..-...::-.--...:.:...-- ..::.-.--:.:,-..-.:*.,..-:..**..:.-.--.**:.-.--.,,.,. ..........,.........-..-..-.....-.I......-:.-.%...-.-..- ..-......, -.-.-...... -............-....... ......-....... ...-.. ......-.-%... ..-.............:.....-.. ...:.........:...:-...-.:...:-.....:..:-..-.....::....-.....::, ... --*.....::... .--.....::. ...-....:..,..--.-....::..-......:-:.-..-....:.:...-..-.,..:. :..*...-....::. .....- ..,.;....--.--..*-,.*-... .-. *..-......-*-...,.....-.-...*'.......-.-..-..*-.....,..-.... ...,....-..... ..*...............-....I.......-,. .....,......*.-:........ ......-:.-.....-......-.:,-...... . .-..,-. ...-...-.-,,-.. .-.-..-.-%-.,..,-..-...---..,...-,....-..-.--.....-.,.-.-...-..-.-.-. -..-,-.-.:.-..--......'.,-.- .:.-.--.....*,-..-,.- .- -..-..,.-.:'.--..-..-..'.-.:'.-.....-- .-.":......-...-...:...* .-...:-.....-:..:...:...O.::..:.*.:-.-:.:....:.:*-.-::......::.-.*-:.::....:.:-.*::..:..:.:..::.,.:..:.:.,,..:. :...:*::...::. ...:,..:..:..*,...:-....:.....:.....:.....:....: ....-........:...:O.:...-...-...-....-...-...-....-...-...-....-...-...-....-...-...-....-.. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- ..............,.....-.........-........ .,............. ...........I..... .. ................... ...... ......................-.......-. ..............-.................-,........ ...................................: ........,..............................................%...................... .. ,.. ..... ...,........ ..*... ..........., -..... ..*.-...-...:..:,-.....-.:.'.:.- . .....*..:'...-..,..*-,....-.*......:...--..:,*., -,..:...--.,'...*:.*".*.:,........:'.*,,,.....:...-.'**..:*-.* ....:....0....."'-.:.,.. ..*..*.:....'..*:..,. ..-.....:.'.-..,....:,.*.-.... '..-..:.*..*....:'.. *.. -...*.:...,.*'.:....-......:..........:*-.*'.. . .:... ..-..'-..:.*..*....:.'.. .-..'..*...:. ...' .. ..-..-..... ..:.* ......-........:............-..... :........-.. . ...:....-......:.. ..-.-.....:. ...-...%....:...-.......:..%.....-....:........-..-....:......-.-....:........-.-......:........-........:......-.........:.......-...... ..:......-........:.......-........:......-.......:.....-.....:.......-..:......-...:...-....:..-....:..-...:.-....:.-...:...-..:...-..:...-.:...--.. .:.. ..........................I. ........... ::::.::: ...-.,". .-:..I.,?...-.*..-.I-... ..-...I.-,........"-...-.. .-.-.,-. ..*--*--I....- .,-....-.-..*-.-..-.:.,----.-,:.-..-.,-*.-:--,,--*.-.-:.-.,.-- .-".-.:*-,.-.-,-"-:..---,---.,-. ,-*.%.,,--,.":,*- .-:. ,*.::.--,,:.-----:,,---:,*-,-:.,----,.: -.-,..:.*.--:-.---:-.-*:..--,.:-..--..:.-...--.:.-..-.-:--...,.-,--...,..*-.--...,..%-..,--....-.-.. ,...-..-.-.%. .,--... .-....-...,.-.-...--....,..-.-.i......-...-,-. ...-.....i..-*......-..-. ..i.-.....-,...........i-....,..---I.........i....l ...-.-....-....,i....-.-...-..-..*....i* ...-.-.-... .... .i.,.....,. ...-. . .*-..*.....,.-... -....*..-.......-....-..-.,.,.....,...,-,.-....,...* -- ..i.... ..-,.,....i. -..--.. ..i..,.- . ..-..,.--..*- -.--.o.."-:--'-.-':--'-:'--:'.-:'.-:*.:--*:--,.*-,-,-*-*-*-'-'-"---,---'-'-'-"-'--/-'-.--:- .-:- - --.:: --.:: --.::--.: -* .: -.:-.:.-....:,* *.-'... :* ..'-.' * ...".., ...'... %'....*...*.:. . ...:..-..:..- ..:-* .-.-.: ,-.: .-:.....:.-:.....:-.:....- -.:.....-.:.....-..:.......-.:......-...........-............-.... ....-......... -....... .............................-........",...-...I...-... .....'..,...*..,-........,.--.. ...,....- ...,- ...:..*.....:.....-..*:...*-.- :,...--:,....*:,....-..:,:..:...-.* :.:..:...--: :....-.-,.:.....--.....:..*,-....*..*.*..-......':%...,..-...-.:,.. ....- -*:.....--.,:......,-*...:..-.-...:,..-..,..:.-,....:,-....,--...,-.....-.,...-.."........-..'.....-. ..*.......*......-..'..-...'.....'..-..'..-..'...-..... .............-...-...-...-.......-...-...-...-...-....-.-.-.-.-........:.:.:-:---:.:-:-----------.-.--.-----------.-.-.-.-.-.-.............................-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...-.....-.-.-.-.-. 3 0 ...'..........-... ...*..-."..-...".*.,.-.. . ..-' -.....*-. ........-........%............... .............-..........:.....-... .:.....-. .:....-.,...-.,...-..,...-.,...-.,. ....-...............................*............ ,.........,........, ....... *... ...-.....-.....-.......-.......-.......... .......%.......... . .......-................................... ................ . ................:..........:.-,.....:.*.....:...-....:...,......- ........,... ................... ...... .......... ..................... ....................................................................- :-:.*:"- * :...,.--.. *:..--..-...,...*-..-%.-.*-..-, .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. .................. .... ..........-..l......-.-......*.........--.:...-.:.-:....l:.....:-...:....-.. ....-.-.... . .l.....-.....-.....-.. ..........,........ -..-....-...-..,-.,.....,..,..,............ ..: -.-.-...-.-.-.--....-......-.... --..--...-..-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....--..--..... .I..-,..-,..-,.,-..,...,-.-.-.-...-.-................ .,.,.*.".,.-.,.-..-..-..*..,...,...*..."....-...,...*...* ..,..*..-..,..,..l..,.* .-..1 ................... ....................................... ........ ....................................................... .-I.::.^..*.-*.:.,.: - .. .* :..:.....:....1.:. . .l...-:.......-*.1. ...*. .......-'.-......:..,,..:....... ,-. ..-...--......-.,.........-......-... -.....,. ..--.,.*.....-*.......-.-.-......*...-.-.-..........,.-.-.........,*,....- .-...:.....,.. ...%-....-....: .....-,..-.-. ..:...--. .-... ..,*. . *...,....,,..%.,-.......--...... ...--.....,...-..--..-......-.I...,.. . .*..,..,... ,.*,,.. .. I',.. - ,'..... .l%.l....... ......:.... -.:.....:..:...-:......:. ..:...,-.; .... ...::..-.: .....:.:..-.:....:.:.....-..:...::.....-..:...:.:...........,:*... ......- ..........,..........-...............-........... ..,..........".%....... ....,..-.....,.......-., .......-*.......-....*....... ....-..-.. .....,-.......,..........*..... ........-........-.........-..............-.....-...,.........,.......-,.. . ..,-....,,....,*...I.., ...-....*...:,..*:..:,...,...-...%....*....-...*....,...".....*....................................-...-...-....-...-...-....-.....:-..-...--...--...--.:. -..:.--.:.-.-..:- --..--. :--.-: .:.-.x-..-*I.- -.-.-..,*.-,.-,. --,,.- % ----:- ---.----.--.--'-'-..-,-.-- .......... ...... , , ' ..................... .1..1..1..*...,.."%. ,.*.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- :.:.:.:......-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.: .... 11... -:.-...:..-.'.-'..: .%..-.-...:...,.-..: .,,.- -...:-,.- ....,...-....,............................................. ............-............,..-..................,....-........"....:....-.........-.....,... ..-...:......-... ....-. .....:.....,.. .......-....*I...:..-..... -..-......... .-,:.... .I.. .-',-*...*....,-. :. ...... -*.--......."....: ":%..,....-...*..- .....,.*:.. -..,:. , .,...- ....- -.. .....,:.-*.I.:,.. .....-, .. -..*. . ..*...:.. .....- -.. .. '...:...- .-.*:.....:..1.--.I1.I....:.* ,. , -...,-..: '.- .-. 1:'.. .1 .-:.:.: ...-..:..:.....:..-..:..:............-.:...:. ........ -..:..:. .......-:.....,..-....-.:.......-..,...: ::......-...-.-..,:.*........-..*:.:.:. ...-...-...*,..:.. .. .. *......... .....,......-.*...........*-.......-...*....-.....-......-......-.............-...-... .-....-... :.. .. ...-.....:...:.....-......:...*. ....,.............-*.........,... -.:.- ........:..'.. -...-.,.......... :.-. ..'..-.....' .-....,--.* .-....'.. :-.- ....-..*....*..........-... .......... ..........,.....:.... : ............ .... I I. ..-..-. .- ... ...-. .-..... ........ ..... -.......... ..................... .*. .. ...-..1.. .....I.. ...... ........... .........-._-.I-. I. .-...............,....... .................-.........-.-............................. ...............-...................I... ........................ ...-.....................-.............. -. --,: :-:::.., -:.-.1 :" ... ..*.....*...... .. .l.....*.... ..%....I..-....%...l. . ..* ... ....l.....l..... .... ... ........................ ...I.... ...........X,-..'...i-,.,,'.;.-, . ,. ,,. . . ...".-....".. .,..I. .. ......I ..... .......:.....-.. ..:....... ... ..................... .....,........,. .....,....................... I..............,..........*...............%. ......... ....,...........,.............' ........."..............,.............."...................*..,.....,.'......* .. .,....,,. ............. ............................ .:.:*.--*..:-:---:-.-.--:.. --..--..--..--..--. ----.----.---.'-----.- ----.-.--.-- -.------.--- -.- .-.--.-.- *.*.*.*"I .-.-.,..,..,..,-.,..* ........................-..-..-..-..-..-..-...... .................... - ............" ....'.............. .... . ...-........-.......... ..-.. .-..-. -.-:.,..- .--.-... .. .- .....-.... ^.I...*.I- I,. ..1 . -....,.......-... l. ........:.... -...,-.:... -..*..: .....,. ..%,..-..,......,-.....-.%..-... .-.-......*.,.-...*.-.% .,.....-.,-.. . . '.,-,.-..,.Z..,.',.,-. .- *,.. . *..,.. -,-.. .,,.,.. . :.:...1.:-.1.:...-,.-1-. ...-.--.....:.1..-.-..,...1...:. -.-.- ....,-.. -.....,-....,.-.. .,......-..,... ...-......-.... ...:. -.....: .-.......:...* ...:... ,.....:..... . ....... ..... ........................-.........-............ .... ......-.....-.......-...,..........-... ...............-..-..-.....-..-..-..-..-..-........-.-..-..-..-..-..-..-............ ...%.%... .. , ,-,,-,-,, '-,,, ..........*..*..-..'.-:*-:--'-:*-:--*,-- *"-*-*-'-'-'-'-'-*-'-'....... ................ cc 2 5 ..:,-..-,'.--.-...-*',.'-.,-,.":..*.-,."..".,.-' ...-..**I--."...*..Z -,-'.-;-...-..%--.'--..-.-.-.-'.----*.- .% .. --.'.".,-5 . *." .,7.'..".-...% .:.. .,...'..-..,"...%..-,"......-*-'- ,. -..-. -.--,"-....--.-,"-..-..---...-....%.,...,.--,.. .. . .......*-...."....... .-...".........- .'...:.... ........:.....-.. .,...-..... .-.-,.*,-..- -.*Z;4-..,.*, .-. .,- .*...,.*......"........."......*......*.. ....."-......"...-.........- .......-..................-.. ...-......- ........-........-........-..........-..........-..... ....-.......-........-..........-......... .......................................................................... ............ .....-.........-.........-...................... ..... .............. ............................................................................................ 7......-...4...*. . -.-.*1-...a.-. .:.-... -...... .....- .-.............--.-......... ..-.. ...:...... ... ..... .... -....I,.I.. ".. .. ...-I..*. ......,.....-.%........-.. V..... ...-..,..... ......-...........-... I.........- ..V. ..... -....-.::.....-.:...... ....,:. -..-,--..-...- ..*.-..,I.-.----...-....*. ..-*..*.-.- -.... ...':.-..-I.,.--. -I.,-....-I .....*-. :. -.-*. .,-... ....,.,- ....:-.,-. I,,..!* ..-,.-.,.-,"..- -,- :- .-.--r:. .-.7..* ---'-, . ..-- . - ,. ...- ..... ....- .............-..............-............. .... .........:.........-........ :.......-...........:......-:%"... ..:...:.*... -.. .......:. .%*..-........:. ....-....."..:....-.......,:......-....*..: ..... .:.-.*..,:...:.....-...-...-**...:.:.......-..-..,.,.,.-:......-..*.,..:-:........,.-..,.:.-...:....**.-.*.*....-:-.:.. ....- .**. .*.-,..*:...... ... ..,...-,. :..........,-.,.....-*.....:.....,.,.."-..-........,:....*..-....-.-...,.:.: ...: ."-..-. .-....*. .:..-...'..-.-... :.:-.. ,:..:-.....-..,.-,.,.-:-..:"......*-,- .-.-, :..... .,--.,--...,..*.:,.-.,...-.'.:.*.'..,..:.-..,*.:.'..-,:.'..-:...:... -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. 5 .*.....,.. ..:..*.-. :..-..., .-.,..-..*...-..,, .- J,.-, ,- ' .*., .-I- ., -..'-..*.-.-:..'. ..-..,'* .*- ... '".-..'...-.' .'. .-*-..-.....'.-.. .."....:'...r..*. ...'....'. .i..1.-....-,'..".1' .'- .1 ..1.. ...............:.. -..: .:..:....:.....:. .:....., ... :% . ....:...:......*........:....:......:.....:....:.. . .:.:-.*.....-....**.... .-...:... -..:.,:..-.,I:. ..:,....-*:.:..:.-:*.--.:.:.-.-.-..,.:.-%....,:.-. ..,.-:-..*-:..-:*..--..*..-..%*-.-.,..-..*....- :'..-'.--'--.'--. -.-..:.:-:-:-:-"-,-:.:.:.: . - - :: ..:-*.::-.:::::::::::::::::: . .l.. .... ...... ............ . i .................. :....:..:..: .:..:..:..:..:..:.:...-....-." ... -.... ..-:..:...-:.;-..*.,. -. . ...........................,... .... ........:....?:-..-- .:. 1 - .:- :--.--.*.,.--.:...: :...-...:.:.....: ...:.:...:.:... , ...*....:..: ..:..:. ..:..::...,..-.:..*...*.-...::..-.:.: :. -.:::...-...:....-...:. .*- .: .-...,*...:,- ...:,--..:... .:....:..-..: ..:...:.. .-..:. ..................... ...... I. .. '..--- ,"I-- ",,,_I?- .-, .1. I. . .....-....I.. ......".., ' . *-. . ..I..- ....-...I... -......I... .... . ........ .................I... .... -.-,..-,....,......,......,,..'......... ..... .-...o............. ............,..... ...........................................'...... .. :*:*:- , .,-:::-:-:.:-:-:-:-:--:.:---;,-:-,- 7:,-- ,.,--:!XI-!:--f " i ,- -, ....II.I .I I . ........:....: . .......*...".......-..*. ... ..-.'. .,?,.,,'.,, ,.-,.,., ,,., .. ,........ ... .... .,..,........ ......................-....-...-.-.--...-.. .............................:.:..::.::.:;.:.::.::.::..:.::.::.:.::.::.:..::. .. ,1, ............... . .................... ... ..... ....................... ,-- 4 ....... :-:.:.:-:-,.- - :. ............... ....... ... ,.-.-. . -.-.-I..,.,.- . - .........1.,- 1.-.-t. I .*.".* I.. ................................. .. .,.-- .-.--.-.'-*.**.'**.. ,.. . . :-:-:-.,-.-,-:-,-:-"-:-*-:.-:.-.:-.:-.:-.:-.-: -1,.1*;,," . .,*, -11 .. ........... ......................X...... .:..:..:..:.-.::..-.: .-,.-,...:.-.:-.:-..:.-. ,..-..".** ..*.".."....,*....*..:'-*. :'-..: .-: -:-**'6-.':-.:'%:.:..% :*:.%-. .*...-.**...-.*."...."'.. ....,....*...*%..,..-,...%-. -.,-.,..-*.-..- ................ , ::::::::::::%*.".'.,:.. .. ... .. ..... .-. ................... . ............* ...... M'l - 1- 1111- 11- 1 -'**""-""*"**"**"",%"*,-,***,. /-.-I '.- ---. - .....- . - - !, ................. - '. 1. . .......... ..-.-.-.-.*-..-.*............................. ...................................... I ............................ ..... -:. ,, J, *.,.,.-.-.,.- -..--.. -:.--,* * " * ....... -*-*-:.,-*-:::::::::::-:-::-:::: .. ................... .:-:.:., :-::::*:*,-* .*.". *. .. .- , ,, -;:, tse ........ ,.,.,................................. .. .i ,,, . -:-:-:-:-:-:-.:...-:,..-,: .*-::.. :.-:.- :-:-:.-.:..:...... .............................................. ....I.. ...... .... -. .0 ..... . ............................. , . .. , ..................%. .: .... ..... -.-.-.-%..:. ...-. *-..%-.".".-.-.-.,.,.-. 2 0 ...'.... .... .:.*...:.:.::v.:-:.::-:.W,:*.:;. :' -:" :': :::: : .. .. ... :. ;i 'z 71 1, -:-:--*:.- :-*.,.,.*.,...,.*.,.,.*."..*...'..'.*...*..*.-*...'-.*, .-:..:..:.- .- .- ;-, :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-.---:*- :.-.:-.,*- .,* " * I * I ,-'-'-'.'-'-'-'-,-*.-'.-'.-'.-'.-'.-*. .*.-.*-.' . .. .: .: ............... ............:-.,..-:.-:.-.:-.:-.:..:.-.:..:.- :.-,.-:. .I. ... ........... .............. ............:. ..... ".' .............................. ........... , .......... ............................................... ....:..,...l,...-,...,--....O,-- ...,..-.-..-.-. - .-.,.-.-.-.,.-.-.-.-.-..... ,.-.-.-.-.-.-.'-'-"-*-*-,.,::-:-:-:-:-:.:.:-:-:-:-:-, ..:.-:-.: "-.-.:.::-...-. . :..... -......:.. ..-.-- .-.....-.-.... .*....,..-.* -......--.-. ,...V-..---.-.-.. i--,. . ..-.-I.... --...... - ....:-.....:-.......,.:.-.... .: ..-....:..-.....%...-...,.-.*-. -...-...:.-..--...:%....-..*..:....-..- ..:.,...:..-..,.,.. :..-: ...-..-..:... .*1..:.-.:....;4.'..:,., .:.. ,- .. .,. : :..-I.:: .- --::..'.1..-..,:.-...-- .-.:....'....--.......:.. ...% .......:..............-.-...............- -.... ...... ..-.-*.... ......-*... -...... -. -.....%.-.....--......-- .....,-.....,-.... ..-...-.......,.. ..-....-..... .-.. .....o.-.....-.-...,...-.-..,...-..-...-...I.-I.--.,.f..-...- --,.- -'.-..... ,.- --.... .:.%..-... :: ...-...I..:-,-*.. ".....,-...,... ..-. ..-...-...-.-..-..-..-..-..-..- .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- LL .:.....,...-.*...*...:-...-....'.,.:....-. -... *:... .,. - ..:... -.-........- .::.:.. ... :-. ,,: .-....-., .--1... .-. .7.-.,..-.$. .. -.. ..- ...-...- ..-..,- ,-..l- ..--,,..- .....:.......-........ -...-.-.......-....--....-......-.......,......-... ..v. .,...........l...:.......-.-....*.-...-. -*.-.....-..,...*.. ..7...'.....:*..-7.'.-.... -.- .. .4,,--..V ,..,..,;- .!.rP..... .l...'... l I... :, . ... .*.: .".-. ..*:'%.* -.-. ,' .,..-. -,..*:.... ..,.,. :- .....,,-.:.-..:.-...*.:....:..*.-*....:..:.... ...:.-.--........:.....:-.:.-.. ......,...-... -...-. .. *...-........-......... ...-.................. .......... ........................,..........*....... ..........*..-...... ...... ..-............-."........,...W*. ...-. ..........,.,I...*....t.1 1.-... .....,... , ...... .....-.-......... -...........-;-..-..... ..-......%.....-....-....%.... .................. ...................................................-.-.-.-.. :..-:-......................*.*.,.,.*.,.*.'.'.*.,.,.*.,."... ..,..,....,-..:*.- .:. -: -:.:-:-:--:.-:".: -:.:._:--1 -:4..":-1-1'-6:?.1- * ,- . I.*..*..*... ..:-.,x. . ........-....- ...........,. .... ........................ ....,.;-. ..-............. . ......... : . 1 1 ... '. , , , , , I - ...:..:..*..I:.I ..- .:.,.... .-. ....-..-..-... ....... , L '--.-.-..--. -.-..-...%..-..-.-t-..,o- -.-k.--.. ,! *.*,-- ,.,-.' - -.':-..':-.,.*:-,-.:-'.-.:.:-..-.::-"....-:- ...*:.-..'.. .*-....--.-....-.'...-..*..-.-....--.'..-,...-...-.-...... -........--..-...-.......-.......-.....-.......-.... -...-.....-....-...-...-....-. '**...'. '. ...-.,..............4-.1. -.--!- -l- Z ',F' !!t .. * ...*. ....... ....1..1 .-.-.+*.".,Z. - .;--. ,- .,.,-- '-a . ,",- l 9,-,, -.. ._ .... ...................... ..... ".j.-%LI-' .-.-.. ,r--,!-1 LI ,z .I rr ,: :::::.:.::.::.*::..:,.:..-":.,,.:.,; ' ,.:- , ,.:!, .l.*-I-,. ,- .,.-.,..,.. -.- ,.,-.":..-:.*.:.--*.:..-..:.,....--..:..'-.....:-.I-'...:- .:.-"..-..:. -:-....-'-.:-:...-..*-:..:*..--..,-...:.,: .:-- ......::.:.-.-......-::.:...'.--...:...-..:-:. .-*.. :-.. ::.-1.'..-. 1:- ..--, : .,.-L :!..�-, ...-.,.-.-!...., --...*-.;...,-...-.. ................................ ,.*.,.,.*1.,..1, .1.-.-.,.--.%I -.,.- , ::-: ..- ... I .. ... - ..........: ..: ........................... cn 1 -/---.-.-- -' ', I .... . .....- ....... ..-"-,. ..,.,."..,...,.,.*.,.,..*.....* ...*...*.. .. ....... .... .................-..-.;..z. ...- ,... .-:,. . -- % ,, ,- . . . . ........... . . . . . . . .. . . . . -7 - '' , ............%.................................................: -:-":-,I ..... ........ ....... ....... .'.'.l-%l...l. ..'..l. . . .. . . . I . . . . 1 , --- ,4 .-1. .,.-.,.,.-..., . .. .-.... ,. ..-.,.,.* *-*.,.,.* , -, :-:-:.,- - -tk -, , ,7 ....-....:. ...,,'. ..........-. If MI .1.-1.l.-..1... . .-... .... ................................................................................. ........ ......... . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . I I - -' . , . . ."4- " , ; ii. - , - - .. ,.,.,........ ... . . . . . - - "; ..... ................. - O F ........ :-:::::::.:::::j-:7": :- ", " *****'*.. . ***"* '*" **" ** ........... ..........., :.-.--..-.-...-.. -........-......... -, . ...w.. ... .-... . .*..*...* ..........:. .:.., ..%.,.... ,......... ........-..1...1... ............... .,................,............ -..:..p: : ......,. ,-.";, . j,-" . ..,..-..,..*.*.. .,...,..,....,.....I..?., ..: .:..- ." . ...... ......................."................. ..............................................,. ............. ..."....- ..-.- .'.r..%,,.., .J,. .-.,... -.. . ...... ..--...1- .1.1.............. I. ,; ....,.-, '-5- ."*..,..,..,..., ..*.. , '***"*" ' **" ,-,.*. -.'.- *.,.-' ".* .- ..*.. ............. . -A ..........I...-.....,.....-.,...- ..... ., .-....... *.-........,...-..:.,..:....,.....-, . , -.-...4-'-*,.-%.5 . .,.1.., -,. ,:.:*:.:II -:-- ,:,-: " - k - 1........' .................... ......... ........... .............-..-...-.--...-.... .......,.....".......,...., ...,..%.,...,.......................... ....... .. . ...........................1... .....1......,-.-.....*..I.-..- ...*..-..-....f, .l,...,..4,. ...p... ....-.:.. ..-..t,..,.k.:.. '..z....... .. ....................................... - :..-.:.*-:...-. .::.....-....-..:..... -.- ..:....- .-.- ............:-......... .. -..,,,. ,.-,- ., , ..,. ,.,. ..-.. .........--.& ., ., 1! .: kA, ,-*' ............. ...:................-:..... .......:.. ...... ....... .........-..1,,.,- . t.-'. .-.. .... .:-... :...-.-..:..--.%..: -.-..-:.-..-:.-:.-.-.:.:-.-.::....-:....:, ....:-....:......-. ..,....-....'...-....*......'-.....'.'......'..".-......*....-.:....... -...-..*........,-.......*..., ......... ,..'.....--...,,..*.. -.7..,.... -..., -.....,-..,'.-.- ..-.A., .'.,.. I4-.. ..... ..' .,...-.::......'7..'...........V -.....'..-...... .A.,-... ..,........... ..,..-.. .,.. .,..-..*.. ... .............. - --4 - .... ............. .......- ...., .:-:-I-,L-*--1-1*-1 -,4- ...1....1...-.1..,-, .I*. .1- : .. -1-:. -..:.- :.---: ' :'. ..:::--.:... ,1-,--. .-"-. -,,I "',. 'Iz, ,, --l'---. -........................................ ... -........'...................................I..... '... ...,... ..... ...,.. ........ ............ . ...]I .-..,Y ..I -- -1.. ... II .. .,2..,. %.... .. -.., ............. ..... :-. ..............-.-..- .......-I " ll --- - . z ...... ....... ..... ,.-,, ,;, ' ............... .....- - ' , -1 . . : :::::::, 7 "---,--,- ---- . 11 .. . -:-..:-:--':--'-,:':-:*:-,: .- It .-... . . --, -.- , - .... , . . ..... -;,*,V, ............................................................................ ....... . ...... = i '.% %.................... - ,* . ,'2-- FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED IN THE UNITED STATES BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - - - --- -- - . - - I I -..- _-- .1--- .. -. ---- 1.. - - .-.,.1 .I-I I -,- - --,- -. POT-ENT-I-A,- L- F.L11O . O-D- DA. MAIG ES IN- .THE -U.S.. -- I- ..I , --- -I - - - I . I I I - I - ......".,., :.,, .--,..:-.**.- .*....-.,*,-. .--..**-,*....*-.-. ,".-*..-....--, . -..-......' ,.-.-........."....:........--.....%".:........-....-..:.......'.. - ..-..:,......*.. .-. ..- .-:. .....,-. .-..:.....,..-.-.. -.....,.-.......:*. ..-..... ....:...:..-......-.:...: -.....-...-:...:. -........--:.....:.. .- ...-.:......:.-..^.-....: ....:.- ..*...-,..*...-:.......:-'*.......-:.-..*.*:-.....-*..-:*.......,*..:-*..-*. -,. ...-."....'.:-*.*. ..-.. .... -..:.. ,..,..-..-...-..,:..,:........-...--.*.....:.,......*.. ... .*- . ... ,:... "....:..-,-: ,......,.:..-.-..*.-.:.,' :...,...:...--- .,--'.:...:......*..-,.,.:-'...*.-*-,...:....*-' .-.-.-,....:.*,....:'..------. ..,:...,:',.-.-.-.---.. :*.'.:.,'-;....--.-.-..:.:'..*-.*.-..-.:.. .'-:.--...*---*....*.:.-'.-..'..--..,,.-'-:--...*.,.-.,'..,..:,. *.*..--..-.., :*,..::....-* .-.,".,-*..:...,..,....*.."--:..-..:....-,-,.-, :.:.,.......,*..-.,%:,-..:.:.... . ..*..."--..-.:*....-...-.-..-.....:...., -:..-,.....-. ..,..,.:...-.....-.. ...:...,....."-.-.*..l.:...,*.:....*.*-..-*..'-:...*.....-. :..:-*,%.,.*..,-.'..-...:-:.. .--.,O....,.*.:..':..,:.,-....-..-.:...,:.-.*.:'.....,..-,:.-:..-.....:,..,-,. '...:.-:-,....*.:.-..-.-*,.-..,.....-.. ,.-..:... ..,...-.......-.,.-..-. .....-:.......,-..:-....*..-:.......-.,..--...-.*.,.......-..,:..:-.,...:....,.-.*......,.-...,.-..*....-.,...-.,...-..,.....,...,.-.,.....*...-*-,...,-*.-*-.*-*-.,-,..,-,-*.,.-'-'-'-,.-,..,.-,..,..*...,.-,.-.*-.,.-.*.-.*-,.,.-.,-**-'-*.'.*.'-'-'.'-'-'.':......... ..,:-.:.--o...:.*..:....:...-.:...:,,.:...:,....:...:....:. ..-:.....:.%. :.... :...,.....,......,...-..,.-.-. ..., . -..,.-..,.-..-..'.-..*..-*...' :'...-.:'...--:'...--*.: .-.-..:.*.-.."..-:....'-.*...-..:.-.,'-... --..:.. .'....-..:..x.*......:.:..-.-.:..:,...:-..: ...-.x..,.,... ..-: ..,...:O-. ..::...-......-:.,....-..,*..-.-., ...-..-,. ..-..-..*....- .-...'..-.-.'.-.-..'-. -..'-.-. *-...--.'..-- "..--..'--..'--..'--..-'-..-*..--. -*..-.-....'---...'-.-..%.-'.-...-.*.-...--..-,....-...-....-.-.-....--...-..-...-..-...-.-.....-.-......--.....--......--...-.-....-.-.....-.-....-.-....-.-.....-.-....-.............-............................................ .................%.. ....... ............................. *....,.,.-.-.-.-...-...-..........:-:-:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:-:.,-,.....,.*.,.,.'......,..................... ........ -.-.-.-.-..-..-..-.................... .. 5 0 ...,.'.. ....,*:..I..-,. ..:.,- .:,...-..,.:...-....:....--...:-.. -,...-.:...,-...-.:.*.-.....:.....,.-........:..,...-.... ....-..:..-.,.... ...:...--. .....*.:..:.-- . --...**.,-:.-..--.-..-":.,.,-....--...-.-:.,-.-. .....-.--:-..'..'.-.-..-.,..**...."--.-.*: -..-...--'..,-'.-.,..-.*.---'..,.:..".-...'.--...,-:. .:. .'-...:,-..-.-:. .,'.,,:....--...:-:.'..,..:....-.-:-...:......:'.-*....:...*...-.:.....'-...-.:.........*:-...-.:..... '......%:-.-.-......,:*.....-..--...-. ,..-:...:....,.-.. ..,....-.-...:......,.1...........-..-.....o....*,..-.....1......- .. ..,..-............-..1.I.....*....... ...-.....1.........,.....-..-. . ...... . ..:..-..................-.-....... .. ......-..-..:..... .:....-.-....:.........-........:.....-...-...-.........:..:.:.. .-..... ....O:...:......-......... .:.:.: .... ..-.... -.......:.:..........-.....-..:....:.:.........- .....:....:.:,...... .....-. . :....,......-.....-....-............-.*..%....................-.... ..-.....-........ ...-...-..... ...-..... ...- :.....-l.......-...-....... ...%:....-.......-....-...:. ......:.-.. ...:. -..- .............:...:..l.......-......... ,....::.*........ ..-.....,.. .. ...:...... ...-........ :.... ........-......:-.:..:..... ...-.-..... -:. ...:.:......X-. ..--... ...:....-:...-... .--.-.. ......:..-......-.-.-.......:..: .-...-...-......-..-.:..- .-.-.- .... .-..:....-- .......:..- .-.. ............*........-....,.....-.....,...I... ....... ............................................... ......%... .... ...... ... ........... .... ....:..:........... .. I - ........ ... ...-.,................... .-...................-.. .....I-... . ..........................:...-..:....-...:...-....,...- ..:...-..,..- ,..-,. .-*.. .......-..-....-.... .- ....-....-...... ....... .........-....... -....-. ...... ....-..-..--..-........................... .. ......... .................. ...... ............................ ............................................... ......................... ... .... I.I - . . ."..-*...... I-.. .*..I.....-. .I. ... .I.-....l -... .-......-....-......-..:.*...*......-..... ... .,......-.--:........,: ..*.....:....:.... .....,.:,.:. :.....: .,I:-.. .-..I%..:*-. ,.-.....** :. , -.I.. ..-..*I.* .. ...,I,:.-.-. -....- ....,..- -:-.*....**..--...-.--. I,..,. .I....-.I. ..:-.,.I "I.. .-..I*.,. .-.,- . -.: .- :,. .1.,.-.. .-'....,:..,....*-1..-..., *,.-:.,.*...-.,-."..-, ..,. . .,'...*..., -, -.... .-...'.. ...-..-.,...-......'..,..-*.,..,.. .....-..*...-.,.,-.......... ,....*.,'.- .*.-.* ... ....*...'..."*-... .,.... .,....*.. ...,--..".-.. .. ...*....--.. --.....'.......-*.*,...--...*.. ..........-....-*-.........'.....:.-....'..-.. ..*..*..... -... -.-....:..... .-...'-'..-...............,...*-'..-.............:.:......-....-....-.':... .-......:.. .--...-..' . .-..:..........,.:-%.-.,.-'....* .. ..-.4.:.......-.' :..-. ...1....*.. .:.....-'-..-....-...-. ..-...--...':.. .-.-......I-...-- ..-.-'....-.-...:.-.....%-...,.-.*---...*.,......--.-.. ..,-... ...-.-..*.::.-.-.:...*.,-....--..-.-.%. ....-.-.::.. -...-........-,..........--.....,:.--.....*.-..-% ..- ...-...-...,..-.....-..-........--..-....-:............ ....--.-..,.-.,.:. ...... .". .... .-.-.-..-....,........-.-*...--....,....... ..,.....-.*..,.........-.-.......-...."...,.....-..... ....--...,.......I....'... .-.,-..............I'..,-...-.- ...... .. I'*:...--"-.....-.......*I:-,:...... .-. ...:*...,I-..-..:...*..... .,.. ,:..--.......:..-....,,....:...4.........*.,,".....-.....--....1.,.. .......,......,-.....-........1,...,.... .. .-..*.....-...,.... ..*..........-..-*...............-.... .-,...............-.-.... ..--........-........-...-..-.............. ....... .....-........... ...-...........................-......-...........*....-.I.....-.:*.........-.. .......I*.. -..*.......* .. ........- . .....*... .............-........"..........-................*-...... .........-..,...........-*.. ........-. ..I...-.......-.....-... .-..................... . . .............--...... .. 1.....1...... .-........,.-.. ...::. ...--...::....--....::..%.-.-...-:.....--.*.:..*:...-.. .-.:*.....:..-,.*:,.-.-....-".:..-, ..:. --.....,.-,..: -...:.:-.-..,.-..-..*.-.:.-.,..-..-:.* ..-.-.:... .....-:...-*-.-..... -.:...*--. %-...-.,.*-:.-...*.. .:.:-,..:..1:"-......:-.---.....: *.:,-.1.....--......-.,.. , -...:1: .--,... :.-...,-:..-....-. -:.1.......-.-..-...,---...:.-..1.,-.-...-- .---. -:."..-.*-....-.-. -.-I.-.:.-...-...*.,-..-.I..-:..-.-..,...--.l*I.. -.-%-....... --.....-,...... .. .-*...-*........-... .*.-..-.......-..:.. :-....*..:....--..:-.........:%..-.-. -:..... ..-.-- -..7.,....-..-.--l......-..-I-lI...... . .,,-..- -.......*.,.--.,..%... -..,..----....-*..-...:.*-."-...-... .,.I:..-"-....*.-...1.. I.-:*.-......-,.l.-.. ..1-.I.-:..,.*-.....-.*.--I,*.1-..:..-.. -.. .-.,.-.,.--...*..-:**. .-..,.--.-.-... .--.:,.,.,. -.*.-.--.-....- .*:... .-.--....,...:.- ..-. -....-.,:.-....-.-,.-.-:......,.-.-..-.-.:..I..--...- :... ..--..-....:..- .--.........:,-..-.*- ...,....'*... - .,....... ..-.-........ ......-.....-........-...*-.....*,..-......, -...... ....-.. ..., ..e-......... .-......-..... ......:...*-........*.....I...,.*.......:-I.-........-..:..-I... ......%..' ...-......*...-.....-..-..:....... .-..:.......-.:.......-......-,. ....,*....,...,.,. ".....-..,...,..- ..-........ ...,.......... . .. .-.....I...-.. ,... ....-.. ... .....-.-..:...-.,..I.-......,..,*..:. -.: .:..:.... .........-.: ....--.-*.-. .....-:....:-I..... --...:... :-....:....:.....:.-..: ....:.-.:....-:.......--...%...:..-..:...%,...-...-.. ...-:.. .- ..-. ....-., %.. ..-... -.......,. ..-...:........-..-,..,..:....--..'....... ..,,... ....,........*......-....,...*...-...-.....I.".....-. .... ... -*.........-.-.......-..-..-.-........-....-.:..-.....- .:....-.....:....-....:-.... ........-. -.-*......a..... ....-...,- . ...:... ..-...-..P -...... .:.- Q..-..:....-:.*, .. ...,..r**:..l. -:V...V.:: . - . N..:.(. .+..T.--t. ..r **.f.l. t..r*.&i.: ...-::..::-* .. :.. l...::i.::,.:;:.-.t. .* ..:-.......--... ...-l....-.. ...."l.....-.. ..*......-.. ........................................................... ... ......-. ......... .... ............ ... ..........* .* , .l ..,..l..l....*- .... ........-..., .- - ..........- ...- .. ..... .................... .................... .........9..*..,#.I.A. .- ..W...-.A.1- . lm.*.,A-A-." -. ........ I....,. ....... ., ...,. .* .........! .. -1-1-1-. ..........:. , ....., ., ., .". , ., ., ., ., ., ., .'... .1.. l.:" ' . .- - ... . . . ........... .. . .......... , -- , ....* , .* * , * , * , ,.*.,-,.,-.,* .-..-,.--. *. -.*--------------------. .-...-..-..-...-..-......-..-...-.-.... ..... .................... . :....,.,.,.,.-.,.,.,. ....... '-.%-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . -.- .-.-.-.-.-,..,-..-.,.*.*.-., ...... ...........X. ... ....:- ,: ,-- *. ..........:.::.*.-:.-: -:-.::--",-: -:, -:". * .. I . .. .:-:-:-,-:--:%...,:.., -:-..-. ., .,..., , -.*..-,-.*--,..,l..,..-l-..*-..-.-l..--%. --.--l.-.. -.....l-%.........:.*.. .I: .. .-..:. .I ..,- .-.w.*...---.-.. -. .-..1.-.1.-. ...... ....... ...:...-.-..-.-.. .,.-. ...-.. .-....-..,.%.-....-.. -%.......-...-....-.....-...-...-..%.-... .-....-.... - ....--...1-...--. .-1 .:1-.:1...%,..-.. -. .-...-..-.l..%-.l....-l. ....-%l. ..-,.....%.-%,.. .-... -...-...-...-...-..X.:-.. ..-:*.::.. :.-:..... :.-, . ..,- ...*-"...*,..,*..*.*..*..,.,..,-...,-...,,...-"..-..-.-..-.-..-.l..--...--...*,...*,...-,...,,. .-..,..,..,..-..,.,..-..*...*...-..-..,.,...,..,.....-.....*.......-......-......-......-......*....-....,.....,..,.4, ....:*-. . ...--.....*.- ....:%%:..:.:'- *.... --,%:...,-.: .-I--. --.- .. -.,. -.*:.-. -. ...-.:.. .-.:. -..-,.-,..-.*-..,-,.,.- :.:.%.%. ................ ..,..-..-..-. -.-.,.-.-.-.-.%,.-.-.-."...,..-.-..-..-..-..-. .......4. ....... .......%.. ........................... ........... ... . .. ................. . . ... " . ......%'.... ...........I ..'........ .. .... , .*. ................. ..- -- ... ............... ....... . ......... - .. %.......l . ...%.... ....-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.............,...,.,.,.,...,.,.,.. ......... X......- . . ... ,., -.-.-.-%.-.*... ... 1-1- 11 - ........... .*I V.% ..4%...... .. ...........: .-%.. .,-.: .. ....... ..o... .... . . ..............4.%..*...*.. ...... .............-.- .....-.- .- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-:.--.:--.--..--,..-*.-.,..--..--..--.*.*.-..-...*..--...,..-.*-. ..*...-,,... .,.,.*..,. - 4 0 ........:"....:. .. ,:..-. :-.,: .- .,-.:-.:..,-..*.*...-..-...,...*...*..'....%.-......*.....,.... .I.... ........ ..,'....:...., .......,...... .'.....,....,.. ...*- .. ...,4......*... .-............-. -.........-.%................. ..- .......-...... -........:.-:..:...-....:...::-.:."..:.... .:..:1 ....... .. :...- ...........-..:,.. :.:..-..:*. -. .....:.-.. .-.*.....:-.....-.. :..*-......:.-..-........ ..:...-. ...*- ......-....-...,....-...I.-,... .-..,"-..l....-."..-..,............".:.,........ .....:,-.. ..1-*,...*.-: -... *-..1.*..,.:, ...-:.. .- . .*-.,.:.. ...-:....*.: .*....:. ....: ,...:..,....:*-*....:.,.... .,.....--%-..,..-. ....,-.*.-...-*..-.-..-..-...-*-....-....,.-., ...,-.....,-....,.-... ."..:--... ..:,....,....--....-*0...-. *...-.:..,.- ..-..--.-.,...-..'.....-..,-....-..%,-...-..*-....-...,-.%..-..*-..-....--I...-.. ...-..-...-......-....--. ..-..-.-..-.....-,...-,...-...,-....-...,-..*.-...,-...,-..,.-..-..-..-............................. 1. .-..... .......O...*...:...:..:.%........%..*.....,...-.. .-.,.".,.,.,.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.I '""* ,,*,,-*,**,% *,*,*, ..'.....................- .-..-..-..-..-:-..-:-..-..-.. ..:.....-......: ... . I.-..,. .-.*-..:..-..:..,-...:".-..I....,..,-: :.....-...*-., ....- ..:-.,:..........-,.-. ... ,:.,..-.:...-..-....: .-.....-..-....*..%..I... .........................-.....-.....-.....-...........-. .........-.....-..........:...,........::..,..... ...:.,,. ......."..:.. ....,.:...,..."..:.-.......-*.-..-.....,.....-..-......-...-.......- .,....-.-........%..,......,...-...*...-....."....-..%......,-.......*.I-....... ..-,-..-......-.,.-:...e...,-.-:.....,-.--...-.:..,-.--%..-.,.:-..--.-,..:..-.-.,.-......*-.-.--.. .-...-, .-...-.,-.-...-*.-.-...-.--.-...-.-,.-...-.,-.-...-".-.-..-..--.-..-..%* -...-,.....-,......-....*.-....*.....*........:....:..... ...... ...................... .:.:.:*.- :,. .:.-: .-*-, ...........- : .-.: ,.-* ..-. :.-,.- .1.-1. -. ..:. ..I. .. .... . .-....... ..-..... . . . :...%...... .....,.. .*...... ............ -..i-;;.;.;.,- %.. . ..-. ....-....-....-..... .........1......1..... ......... ............. ..... ..........................%........-....-... ........... .............. ...... :...... ...........: ... -...... ............*........ '-.-....- l.-....*..-...I..- -.....-.....V......." ...-...*...l...,...-. ........................ (A .- .'---. ....-.-:-.,-*.*.. -.. -.*.-. ,. ....,,.*.....,-'.-. ,... .-.'.*..-.-"*..--. *" -...- . *-...*,.. .-.,..... ..-:. ., .-*.. ..-....-.-.-,..-..-..*.-.-..-'-.-.-'.--.'-.-.:.'-.-.:."4-...- - ..'.-..'.-..*..-..'.....-.'....-..-. '.-.....'-....'....-.'.....- ..'....-.'....-..'.-..'.-..'.-..'.--..'-.-...'-.,-....-'..-....-'..-....'..-....*......-..'-..-..*I..... -.I..*.%.. -...'.--. ...,.--....,.-....-....-,.....-.... ..-,..........-.....,......-.%........,..-.......-..-..-.,...... ....-..-.-......,..-.-... ...-..%-.,........-....,...%....- ...... .,.-...-.......-,.-......-.-,...-.-..-....,.-...%..,.-.-..,..-..-...,..--.......-,-........--.-......--.-...,.-.......-..-.....,.*..* ...."."........-.*....*...,....."..*. ..l..*..-...,*.*...,,...,.-*.....,, ..*.,..,.".,....,.,..,..,..,..*.*.."..,.*..*.'-.'-..'.-*.-.'.-.'..-..".-..-..-..,..,.,..,..'..*..,..*..'..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..--........ ,.......-.-.--.:-- :.:-:-.--,.- --.--.--.--.-...- .-. - - ........-. - ..*... ......I*.-.". *.*-.- .... cc --I:.-.I,I,.- I- I.* .-I. . -. .*I...- . I..... -:..-..,.*..' -..,-.-- -.-:--.-..--:-.--.-':-.-.--,-:..--,...-.:-,..:.-,.: .-.-.:- ....:,:.-.-..- ,..:.-.---.:.,..-.. %..,%.,..-. .*.*.--...:-. *..*--.... X.,. .-.-..-.*,..-.*:.., .--..-:..,, ..:-.-.::-. ...-:".:.-.. -.:...:....7:.1...-:..:...1:z. ..-.:-. -..:. ...-.:....:...:....,..-..:,....%.:. .*I.. -. :-*...:%..-:...::...- .:% .:.':..-.:.'.:..:'....-.-'.-...:..,"..'. .......: .'..-......:..'.-,.....:...-,.- .....:...%.-.... .:.....,..!.-.-.,.,.....:...,.. -. ..:,- . .-::-..-:.:..-.-.:.....:..:.-....:.: .. .-...,.-... ..... ......,. :...-. ...-...-... -..,...-.. .-.. .-. .. .......... .... .......... .................................................................................. ..... .... -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...............-.-.-..-.-.-...-.-:.--.-.,----..--*--.. -.....-......*. ..,..,..,..,..,...,...*.I..,...I.,...,...I,....-I....,.... ."......... ............................................. .-.-.,-..--..--..--..--..'.-.-.-....::.. ....-....-1. ......-.. 1 .. ...--- ..-........:....,.:.. ...:.-... ... :.:.,%..... -....-..,.%,.:.. . :,.--- ',.....*%* -.-,*..*.. ""-*.. ".,%...- ,.. ",-.... ,,...*,-.- " .%.-....*..-.-.*".,.. *..-..- %-.".',..... ., -, ",..- .,-',*,.,.. ..,*,- ,**..,....*,--,.. *...".....,: ,, , -..,...,-.-.,,:,. ."-*...I%-:, *%...-,*,%-..,..:,.,-*,.-..** .:-,",...- *,*:.".. ... .,- .*:.-...-,. .,:,... *.-*, .:...,..,-,-* ..:.-..-%....:-..--...."*:,,....,-... ..,,',.,..,.'.....,%.:.*,.....-, ... ,:...,*.-I-..*,.. :,* ..-.., :.--.,*,.,,..-.*.,.* .- ..,-...:,..-,*.-. . .,..,-..*-, -..:..-.,....-* -,.,-..".- :.". ..-.-* .-..*:...',-..- *.*,.,.*..,.-".-.",.,.,.:. -*- ..-.::.. .%*.: :-.* ...:*... .*... :-"..- .-.... ... .."-.-..- ..... *.*- .S....'. -.*.U.....*-.. F ....".-F .. ..%* E-...".R .-*".,'... *E.% -".D %.,. -"*..:.. '-...'"*.-.,..,.-- . .:".,...-..,:..-.-*,.,.:.-*1-. .-%.'-."..:.',1....-.-.:-:*..."..-,.. -..:"...:.-.'..-":.:...*. -. -:%..:.-*.-.':.:..-*.*.:*-...-,.:-.,.,.*-"-: .:.-*-..-:.* :-.".- .::.*:-,. -..-:-,..* --*.,-.:.--.*.'--:. -*.:--"-....-,-"-.:*:-.--. "-".-:-.-."-,.-:,.".-*-.-:.*.--.-.*:. ..-,-.:.,-.,.-,.-..-..-..-.-..-.-..-..-.-..-..-..-.-. -.-.-......... .5 ."..'.,.'., . . .....i..*..... .i. *l. ....... ....-i.....i*. t-f.,. ....-. -.I.m: .1 ., ..l,..i.,..: - , i , . ... *. .i..% .. .., .-..., ".-....-. %',...... ....-.....,.. ... ....,..H.....i.......i.. ..i ....i.i..i. i.....,i.-. ..!...H. .... ...-.l.t..t...i....t,.r..: . i". -. .i.-.:. ..'.-...:-.-- ..-..'...,%-..--.*....':.*.-. -*...... .'.- ...-.. .-..,*.....i1. - ..-.- . -.. .*..-,-..'.--, .-..-.: .. ,....'::-.-,-.*:..-.,*. ,.:, . --,. ", - .-;I. .". I.:..,- 1 .-, ..--.- .. 1 . 1-.-.-.r.,.,-.I.,, . z-" ..-.. .-,..,. -.-. -.,,- .%-...-.,. ..--..,-..*..-. -.. . ..-..*....... ...:....*.. .........- ........ --.%......-....... .-... .........-.... .-.....I. ,...I.. . -. .. .....-...-. ...,:......-.:..... ..%:......*... . .-..... ..... .i. .....,......!.-.... ..i.... .,-......i ...o,... .i....i -...:-.i.:. -..."..i..*. . i..%...... .-X-.-..... -.-i.. ..I...... ...:.. ......*...-- ..--....*..I..I...1 .-......*..-.. ...-.. ..".*... .. -. . ,..-...*....-..,..-..*....-'.*...-.,..'.-.'.-."....'.-*.-.'..'.'..'..*..".-.* .'- . j :.'.* 'X:... '.:..::....%':.... *.* ....- '..'..*,.,.- - -'....",.-.%*.... .-.,... ..-,...-....-* ..-........-..1*....-.-... *,..1.1..-..,.,-.-I .- . .-:.....-*.. -..,.-.... ...-...-I.......-...,I.%:......I -.I.,.-. .. . '..-...-.-..**.. . :-.'--...-"-.....*-,..-.....--...--:.... .. .---.. ,...-.'.,-..:.. ..-...,:-- ....:.. .--..:-.. . .:..-..-:......-:-.-...... .I.-.,.1-. .. , ...--"1,.,.-.-: -. .1,-. .- -.-.1:, ..I.. .I..- .- . ..I.....-..,. :........-,-...%.......,-.:............- ..:..,. .........,.:....-%........,.:.. . .-.. .. ..:... .-.......%.:.....-.......:.....-.... I.....:..... .-..I............ -.I.......... . ..-..,....... . .*. . . ....I-.,. ..... ...,*...-.. ..,.-.. ....,..-....'...,... "...-....... ...*-..........-..-.........,..,.......*...,..%... ... -....*.........*.-,........., ....-..,...,.........,-.,.....%..........-.. ..... ........-. ..,..........--............,..*--.....,..... .......--...:-*..-....."..:..-..- .. .-.:....* ..-.- ....-...-.-.. . ....*--.. ...*....- :.. .- .:-.l. ..-......l-,-...-.. ...-. l.-...-.-.-... .".-....--.....l.....-....% -..,..--.. -,..,.-.-.,.-.-. ...:..:..,.. .. ......... ............ ...... ..... ..1 .1...-...-.....-**.. ...* -..,- ...- .,..-...,...-...*....%..... ...-. .1...-% ..-...%- .... ....-... --.- W,_. I-, ., -..4. .:..:-.:-.:.-": -.*,..--...I... *....*..%'...-.:.'........,'..- *1.....-.*.'...1..'........*.,1 .*....*.-1 '.. *,..',. .-..,..,..,.-..,.."..,..-..-..*..,..%.. :..- -.....-*.. . -.:.-...-..-.:-..-...:...--...:..--. ..%...... *...--.I.-..*.--..*-...-*..-..'....... I ............ ........ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. I 0 3 0 ....1...1 ...-*... 1%......1 ...,.-,1.. ..,.l*, 1... .....-l-:*-1..,....:... l,-.:..... :*..-..:.........:l...:...-..%:....:.....:..--..l:....o:.-.-..:. ..*.-.:-.......1 :...I%.l.-. :...-... .-..: -.l.- .. .: ..,...%:-.: ..- .....,.... %-., :-.-...-, .. -.....-. - -.: ,-.-:. ...-.-"-.--...::.-...--... -... ,...- .. ..-.-*.%%...-...:..-......-...---.-.-:....-...-.......... %.-:.-. . :......I-. ..,-*".....--......-....,. ..:..-..-,4...,... w.-.- :..1 :-!,1-..-..,- -1 ., ,-,',:A . .- 1..--. 1-4,-p . -. ,:. *. :.. .:...--:..:..-..-,:...:....,--- ....,.'.-%:....*-..:%....--.*.:....-...-.-.. ..-.-.-.. '...-..-..-:. ..,...-. ...-..*...-....-......,.-...-......-.-.,..., *.-..,.,.-...."....,*.-'-..-... ..-.. .-'*........-.,,.......-....-,-........'...*-.-. ...........-*...........,.-.*..-,..-...I,........,. -..-.--...-...........,.* .--...-.-. ...*......I....*--.... ....*...... .--.............*.--...... ..*......-..-........,......*.'.-.- ..*.........,.--., ........,......--..... ,.-. ...........--.,-.,.*,.....-......-..-.-..,*.,............%.-%.- .. ............-....*....-.....-..............-....-... ......... .-...............:-........ ....--.......... --....... ..-... .....-........"..........*........."......-......* .....-.....,.....-.....* ...,...,..................... 1, c l . .:.-. :.-.".i.-...I.,. -. ,..4- i. i, -i.- .,il..-i -.-i. *.-l.i- -.,. .I. -..i:- -. .:-X.::....--.,...-. -1..I.I.- .7 .,-- I .- ,-....*.*-,...-.1. .,.*-...-.-.*.i-..%i- ..*ei-.,:, i..:i.:- -i.-..- '-i-.'.i..:..-.. . , i. ...7i.*-..i,*i.-.. i-.... *-i*.:* ,., ..-,.-. ,i. -.i- -i...i..:i.*.*i.-*--. -. .. -.. -...-.... %-..-..-.....-.-....-....:%:..-.,.:-.-.. .-.*.::-..::,..-.. .:.:.,.-,--.- ..-.. -..,-.. *I: .-,.I -., ... .-, I.?. *-..:.A."- .:.,.-.- ..:. :.-.:.:-.:-.,..:.-. ..-::..:.--...::..:...-- -.::.%...-.::......- .:.....x-.... it....i.t.H....-:.H......iH..: .i. ..i.-...i. .i%. :i.....i ..-i i.i: .. ....-. -..:.....-b.. ..-.. -.-..... .-... ..-.:...... .- ..%. ..-.....-.-.... ..-.-,.....--*....- .-..,...-.-,.....-*......-- .*..'.--.. ...-**.. -..-*..,::.- .-.,:..,.*-..--:. .:.: ...-:-,...:.:- .:-..::-:.:..-.:-.%.:..--..,.:- .-..,:. .-.: .. ..1. . - ... . . ...i .... ... i.ii ii .. .. I.... ................ ............... ............. ... ............. ... .:-.:--:...1-,.:.-.. :1 .-..-*.1..-1 .. -..-- ,..-, *.. ....1.. .%. ...... . ...*.. .. I.......,. . ...* ..-..,...-...,. .. -. .:.-: ":.. ,-..",-.. -. :.,.-.- ,--,* I- .":.. :..:. ..*-. .,-. .*-...-.....-....,'..*...... .....-....-.... .......... ...............%............. ......-.-..-.... -. .--.-....... . - -......-... l. .....-.... ..*- ...l...,-.-..-4.. %.."..*. .. ' ' . - II : ,-. %..,..,..*.. ............ . -... ..-....." .. .--.- ........... ......... ................ .. .... ..I. L. . .... .,..,..,....*... ............................. ....... ...... ......-.%..-...-. ........... ... ,......... ....-.*....... V.. . w:.-... .....-........,..-,.., ..-..-..,.,..l- ..--....-... -..,*. -:..,-..,-.,..-,..--..--*. --., - .--..-:-..-.-:-:...*-.:., -....'- .-.-.*.,..%. *.-.-.-.,-.. .*......e.....l .l.. I . . .. ''* - '"*' '* * . .. ... ... ..-..-,.. .-..-. ............................. -.- .-.--f..-. .. ... .............. ... .. . . .%. .................. ...... .... ................ .. U. ..... .,. ....... .............. ... ..:..I,1. ..,- . %.-.,. . .I.. I...-. ,...... .:-.:... ,:. ...:-. '..:.-.... :..- :. :-*:.*.",.-', ..-."-'...*.*...:-..... '. . .-......... ,...*..:. ...- -*. :.-:..*-: -...:-.."..- ;... ,..:..-,.,:,* .. : : ;.-- .-.-.-*..-,...-,.-*..-*. ......-...,..-...,..-..-.-.....:,.-...-.,.-...,-.-..... .*.....-..-.,...-.....-*.-...-.,-.. .-..,*..-.-..- ....-..%.........,.... ........-... .. .......l..."....- ....,-...,.-.,..o..*.-.-. . .*..-.- .....I..--..%..,-.--..,..-..---.-...*..---,.....-.,-*..*-..-- ....--%...-,..*.-,...,.-.. .-..*..,..-..... .- - 2 5 .......11.....,.1.X..... ..1.1*....- ..1......... 1 -.- , .%........,..-*...- ..*.-......,.0.....- ..:,.,.....%......,.-..-..-..........,. ...,.-.. ....-..'--..*....,1 .-,-....* .I; ....S... .,. .-- .... .- ...-.-.......,..-.....I....-.,:1*. .- %1.-.-....--..--:..1 .:-...1:-..--:-. . :....-........-.1-.,:-...:,-.. -..-:... .*-.:--.1..,: ,-- :.... -..-%-:..::%:... .:..--,-.:...:...:.:- .,--*....X...::...-..-.. -..I-...-...-.. ..-....I..-..:..-.....%.......,...-4 ..... ...-.... ...%-.....-...:.I.:......:.:.-......-...:.-.. ...:...:.........-.-..:-.-....,-.I:....:. .-...-.-... ..:-",.I-...4c..:. Z.:....--. . I .-.- :..,,_,;,.. ..t. 1.. ..:...I.1 - . . -.:-: .,.... 1 - . :.-..I-..:..,. -:-.. . .-:. .% . -.:-..-.-..-.--.::...:.---". .. ..-*.:....:....- -..--:...*.-..:...-:.-..- .:..-.....:..--.... -...-.:.....,.-.-....-...*..-.-.... .-"..... ........%-X...-.......-..-..-. .....-....l.-..........-.l..-.........-........l:......-......-.%.l.:........-..-.l....:. ...-....-.....:.......-.....-....:.....*.... - ...-....:.. .I.....-..-.....- :.........-....-....-:.........-.....-......-...."--..-...--.-.....:.-.......1 .-:.-..-...-----..1-.....:1 ..- -..:.-...- .--- -..-.1......,..: -,,-.- .---. .-....:.. -:..- - -..-... -.-........-.:-.-.-.- ..-..-..........-.-.-...-..*..-..-....-..--. .:.--.-.. . ......:-.:..-. - .-.-..:.-.-.- .-:*..:.-.... ..-..-.-. ....-.-.*.......-.-.. -..:.-.-...,. .:.-. -..:.-..,..::...-.*,..-.-:.-.-..:-.... *..:....-...-..-.,.........:*-...:.--...-.......I,..:-..---.... -.......-:.-.--.......-....-.-.--.........*.....--.'......*.- ...-...:...*..- .*.-..-.....-.-'- .-.- ...-..'-.-.-...-.:-*..,.....---*,....--.-:.-..'--.-...:.'----.... -- ...-...-...-...-...-...-. .-..-..- ...................... -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. %-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...... .*..-*. .........,t .....-..-...-.-.. ...... ................ .........,;. .f.,,t .. - ....:.:.....:.... .. .*... ...,.......... ............ ............. ..... .........-..........................,..-... ........................................................ ................................................................ .............. .l........**.. .. ...*... ...*.....*..,..l... *. .*... , . , . . . . . . . . --; .,,,-, .,, I- -ll-- 14.-'. ........... .... .... .... .. .........,....... .....-.......,... .......-.............,............. ........................ : I , , - I I -'---''- '.-.'.-'.-' -''-.'-.-''.-''..-' 't. ,'--6. , ', .'.'.'- . .. . . . .**..l, .. ,. ....,. -. .l.* . . . . . . . - . . . . ,.... .................... ................ . - * ' ..... ....,....,..... . ..... ...., .,.v... . - - - - - - - - ' , , I . - ....... ... .. .. .. CA . -,-.-.,..,.,-,., -,- ,-,, . ........................I. . .......................... I ............................................................ ............... .. ..:, :.,: :., ., -.,.*- .,. . ........-.. . .. *..,.. . - . , . -...... .,....., . ............... .. ... . .. ..... ....... .............................-I.,-.- :.:. . - .. . . . .....'..... . . I , , - . . .1. -------------.-. " * . .............. ,; , .1, I .. . . .l.".%l. - - ... ,: ,, , .:-:-:-:-*-:-:-,: ,- :.:-:., 11 ... 1- 1. .. I .. - - . .................. . . . .:-,-, :: * * ' * ... *- ' -- ' . ' . * . . ' . - . - . - . - . - . - 7;, r -, .......... .....:.-X-,- -:-:-:-:-:-,.X-.:-.,-.:-..,.-..,-*. ..... ................- ......... . .. I.,., ................ 1.1.-.-.'.-.-. .*.-.-.l.V..-...l...*.. ..:. . ...- .-.. -5,''4A , - - - ... :-:.:-.-:-:.:-:.P: , ... .......... .%....%...l ..".l..l....l .............* .....................-..-...-..... ... -,-.... ------,.--.--.-%-- .-.,.-.% .. .-.%-. ,.-.,.*.,.,.*.*.*.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.,..,-..*-..--..--..*-..-.,--.l.--. ,..--...,...-....-. ...... ............ ;-, - "; POTENTIAL FLOOD DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES, DAMAGES SUFFERED PLUS DAMAGES PREVENTED TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 1993, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) PERCENT AVERAGE DAMAGES DAMAGES DAMAGES DAMAGES POTENTIAL PREVENTED SUFFERED, LIVES LOST LIVES LOST LOCATION SUFFERED FY93 PREVENTED FY93 DAMAGES FY93 FY 93 FY83-93 FY 93 FY 83-93 ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 1,967 0 30 ALASKA 0 0 0 0 1,006 0 2 ARIZONA 228,900 113,000 341,900 33 25,771 3 41 ARKANSAS 2,680 143,070 145,750 98 7,521 2 33 CALIFORNIA 165,920 750,435 916,355 82 35,379 17 71 COLORADO 100 928 - 1,028 90 1,344 0 0 CONNECTICUT 0 65,839 65,839 100 1,826 O0 DELAWARE 0O 0 0 0 67 0 3 FLORIDA 2,080 19,155 21,235 90 6,942 0 5 GEORGIA 7,340 6,549 13,889 47 2,257 3 23 HAWAII 2,910 10 2,920 .0 1,859 0 10 IDAHO 0O .. 85,743 85,743 100 102 0 5 ILLINOIS. 2,640,140 2,501,431 5,141,571 49 589,586 1 21 INDIANA 9,550 106,604 116,154 92 7,947 1 9 IOWA 5,740,000 624,071 6,364,071 10 453,275 5 15 KANSAS 551,070 5,760,259 6,311,329 91 29,242 3 10 KENTUCKY 4,980 31,614 36,594 86 6,971 2 38 LOUISIANA 4,020 7,452,058 7,456,078 100 29,537 0 31 MAINE .. 3,040 0 3,040 0 1,307 0 7 MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0. 71,225 71,225 100 151 0 8 MASSACHUSETTS 160 34,133 34,293 100 1,340 0 11 MICHIGAN ' 1,600 0 1,600; 0 5,149 0 10 MINNESOTA 964,050 133,273 1,097,323 . - 12 119,287 4 9 MISSISSIPPI 4,480 105,666 110,146 96 . 12,682 0 20 MISSOURI 3,429,630 9,793,809 13,223,439 74 277,175 29 66 MONTANA 6,720 - 20,070 .26,790 - 75 1,282 0 11 TOTAL DAMAGES SUFFERED IN FY 1993, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) PERCENT AVERAGE DAMAGES DAMAGES DAMAGES DAMAGES POTENTIAL PREVENTED SUFFERED, LIVES LOST LIVES LOST LOCATION SUFFERED FY93 PREVENTED FY93 DAMAGES FY93 FY 93 FY83-93 FY 93 FY 83-93 NEBRASKA 294,500 226,588 521,088 43 6,935 5 10 NEVADA 0 0 0 0 367 1 9 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 3,549 3,549 - 100 327 0 1 NEW JERSEY 0 5,836 5,836 100 3,772 0 8 NEW MEXICO 210 -109,486 109,696 100 3,549 0 16 NEW YORK 55,480 157,744 213,224 74 7,368 7 37 N. CAROLINA 1,400 24,023 25,423 94 2,189 1 16 N. DAKOTA 413,600 109,062 522,662 21 9,961 1 1 OHIO 25,800 107,340 133,140 81 6,180 0 41 OKLAHOMA 44,720 556,345 601,065 93 16,707 5 50 OREGON 1,760 87,844 89,604 98 1,231 0 3 PENNSYLVANIA 440 189,825 190,265 100 1,833 0 25 PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 5,300 4,400 9,700 45 10,017 3 104 RHODE ISLAND 0 2,145 2,145 100 9 0 0 S. CAROLINA 17,920 .300 18,220 2 2,122 2 18 S. DAKOTA 763,380 1,978 765,358 0 6,069 5 5 TENNESSEE 5,070 768 5,838 13 2,050 0 33 TEXAS 56,990 2,631,802 2,688,792 98 39,636 6 190 UTAH 160 34,326 34,486 100 10,639 0 7 VERMONT 7,550 1,892 9,442 20 1,477 0 2 VIRGINIA 0 18,683 18,683 100 9,768 1 39 WASHINGTON 2,080 87,844 89,924 98 3,800 0 15 W. VIRGINIA 620 98,580 99,200 99 9,076 0 44 WISCONSIN 903,660 13,914 917,574 2 13,096 1 3 WYOMING 22,095 22,095 100 445 1 13 TOTALS 16,370,010 32,315,311 48,685,321 66 109 1,180 9 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, . BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DAMAGES PREVENTED FY93 DAMAGES DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS SUPPORTED TOTAL DAMAGE TOTAL DAMAGES AVERAGE DAMAGES COMPARED TO BY CORPS CONTROLLED EMERGENCY PREVENTED BY PREVENTED BY PREVENTED BY CORPS AVERAGE DAMAGES LOCATION PROJECTS FY93 OPERATIONS FY93 CORPS FY93 CORPS FY92 FY83-93 (FY83-93) ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 304 LOW ALASKA 0 0 0 10,000 6,064 LOW ARIZONA 113,000 0 113,000 3,945 21,261 VERY HIGH ARKANSAS 143,070 0 143,070 65,947 446,740 LOW CALIFORNIA 750,435 0 750,435 406,036 1,506,683 LOW COLORADO 928 0 928 9,367 2,430 LOW CONNECTICUT 65,839 0 65,839 4,228 67,734 MEDIUM DELAWARE O 0 0 0 0 LOW FLORIDA 19,155 0 19,155 17,591 6,082 HIGH GEORGIA 6,549 0 6,549 1,474 6,807 MEDIUM HAWAII 10 0 10 194 1,516 LOW IDAHO 85,743 0 85,743 253 21,930 HIGH ILLINOIS 2,483,386 18,045 2,501,431 10,369 324,259 VERY HIGH INDIANA 106,604 0 106,604 27,288 58,577 MEDIUM IOWA 607,180 16,891 624,071 14,662 154,831 HIGH KANSAS 5,760,259 0 5,760,259 298,933 630,227 VERY HIGH KENTUCKY 31,614 0 31,614 35,464 61,641 MEDIUM LOUISIANA 7,452,058 0 7,452,058 1,005,357 7,377,436 MEDIUM MAINE 0 0 0 0 871 LOW MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 71,225 0 71,225 93,074 25,746 HIGH MASSACHUSETTS 34,133 0 34,133 574 61,795 LOW MICHIGAN 0 0 412 6,886 LOW MINNESOTA 117,873 15,400 133,273 2,929 18,558 VERY HIGH MISSISSIPPI 105,666 0 105,666 155,364 622,298 LOW MISSOURI 9,689,309 104,500 9,793,809 299,878 1,263,327 VERY HIGH * LEDGEND: LOW = <1/2 AVG. MED = 1/2 AVG. TO 2 *AVG., HIGH = 2 TO 5 * AVG., V. HIGH = >5 *AVG. - n FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BY STATE (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) DAMAGES PREVENTED FY93 DAMAGES DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS SUPPORTED TOTAL DAMAGE TOTAL DAMAGES AVERAGE DAMAGES COMPARED TO BY CORPS CONTROLLED EMERGENCY PREVENTED BY PREVENTED BY PREVENTED BY CORPS AVERAGE DAMAGES LOCATION PROJECTS FY93 OPERATIONS FY93 CORPS FY93 CORPS FY92 FY83-93 (FYS3-93) MONTANA 20,070 0 20,070 4,483 6,288 HIGH NEBRASKA 192,577 34,011 226,588 7,351 64,110 HIGH NEVADA 0 0 0 0 2,819 LOW NEW HAMPSHIRE 3,549 0 3,549 0 2,560 MEDIUM NEW JERSEY 1,258 0 1,258 445 1,515 MEDIUM NEW MEXICO 109,486 0 109,486 27,619 66,362 MEDIUM NEW YORK 157,744 0 157,744 6,120 86,469 MEDIUM N. CAROLINA 24,023 0 24,023 8,474 21,493 MEDIUM N. DAKOTA 108,831 231 109,062 942 21,096 VERY HIGH OHIO 107,340 0 107,340 6,601 94,928 MEDIUM OKLAHOMA 556,345 0 556,345 52,838 185,131 HIGH OREGON 87,844 0 87,844 47,243 435,760 LOW PENNSYLVANIA 189,825 0 189,825 3,046 233,294 MEDIUM PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 4,400 0 4,400 4,665 3,097 MEDIUM RHODE ISLAND 2,145 0 2,145 0 2,518 MEDIUM S. CAROLINA 300 0 300 625 763 LOW S. DAKOTA 1,978 0 1,978 4,140 1,102 MEDIUM TENNESSEE 768 0 768 496 51,913 LOW TEXAS 2,631,802 0 2,631,802 5,197,449 1,180,292 HIGH UTAH 32,976 1,350 34,326 700 19,366 MEDIUM VERMONT 1,892 0 1,892 2,275 2,253 MEDIUM VIRGINIA 18,683 0 18,683 124,553 35,312 MEDIUM WASHINGTON 87,844 0 87,844 54,343 108,544 MEDIUM W. VIRGINIA 98,580 0 98,580 40,152 66,381 MEDIUM WISCONSIN 814 13,100 13,914 0 1,434 VERY HIGH WYOMING 22,095 0 22,095 1,373 4,464 VERY HIGH TOTALS 32,107,205 203,528 32,310,733 8,059,272 15,393,268 9" FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY FISCAL YEAR (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY83 IFY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 AVI LABAMA 3,350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LASKA 4,885 5,055 6,846 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 0 8,100 10,000 0 RIZONA 12,000 90,630 14,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,945 113,000 RKANSAS 1,006,930 812,472 265,510 466,429 397,794 240,694 401,796 635,569 478,008 65,947 143,070 4 ALIFORNIA 1,097,869 102,360 72,800 113,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 9,500 64,022 406,036 750,435 1,5 COLORADO 9,173 2,639 440 502 1,442 1,755 0 0 482 9,367 928 CONNECTICUT 4,123 391,130 250 25 224,314 0 1,892 53,180 100 4,228 65,839 DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLORIDA 16,687 297 2,079 O 2,619 6,461 456: 256 1,305 17,591 19,155 GEORGIA 2,251 19,426 811 0 4,220 0 850 37,618 1,689 1,474 6,549 HAWAII 869 0 0 220 220 8,540 82 1,085 5,457 194 10 IDAHO 47,140 43,271 338 20,757 623 113 14,900 5,073 23,018 253 85,743 iLLONOIS 97,712 25,570 75,446 68,235 262,386 2,105 7,925 450,687 64,996 10,369 2,501,431 INDIANA 22,370 32,725 117,822 46,287 14,257 9,032 61,145 57,583 149,239 27,288 106,604 IOWA 156,763 200,359 17,060 106,878 376,965 476 -76 128,746 77,099 14,662 624,071 KANSAS 72,487 143,594 26,722 114,694 284,377 16,712 105,716 78,201 30,816 298,933 5,760,259 KENTUCKY 57,646 217,046 9,976 16,110 20,768 7,718 96,757 25,868 159,089 35,464 31,614 LOUISIANA 17,863,178 8,474,126 8,463,296 8,478,185 113,053 1,001,845 5,007,949 9,623,200 13,670,272 1,005,357 7,452,058 7,. MAINE 0 1,982 0 0 7,605 0 0 0 0 0 0 MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF - CLOUMBIA 0 1,011 1,404 109,102 7,000 364 3 9 14 93,074 71,225 MASSACHUSETTS 1,348 422,587 304 437 203,457 230 237 6,975 9,472 574 34,133 MICHIGAN 1,649 1,198 15,197 10,411 31,352 8,477 3,654 3,405 0 412 0 MINNISOTA 4,016 3,790 2,861 22,083 5,888 411 21,995 1,485 5,400 2,929 133,273 MISSISSIPPI 1,486,446 866,631 1,072,098 360,552 226,975 198,604 549,885 626,709 1,196,409 155,364 105,666 MISSOURI 544,166 827,765 100,086 717,926 1,006,876 42,370 117,726 245,361 200,669 299,878 9,793,809 1, MONTANA * 434 985 555 19,531 277 0 27 7,394 15,408 4,483 20,070 NEBRASKA 13,817 124,083 1,082 72,187 172,657 457 17,427 11,007 58,559 7,351 226,588 ERAGE 305 6,065 21,261 146,747 506,697 2,430 67,735 0 6,082 6,808 1,516 21,930 324,260 58,577 154,832 330,228 61,641 377,502 872 25,746 61,796 6,887 18,557 622,304 263,330 6,288 64,110 __ __ i -__ __ FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS _______ _ _ _ _ _BY FISCAL YEAR (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY83 FY84 IFY85 FY86 [FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 AV NEVADA 15,015 2,000 0 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEW HAMPSHIRE 27 9,837 0 350 14,397 0 0 0 0 0 3,549 NEW JERSEY 0 136 135 121 94 4,907 3,336 4,991 1,247 445 1,258 NEW MEXICO 29,968 100,220 119,648 87,139 97,900 21,528 2,755 42,531 91,189 27,619 109,486 NEW YORK 13,192 567,993 15,158 80,610 34,739 5,656 39,507 12,879 17,566 6,120 157,744 N. CAROLINA 24,630 -7,886 14,220 4,034 94,430 65 18,362 17,063 23,231 8,474 24,023 N.DAKOTA 7,883 1,141 53 4,324 53,497 0 47,131 6,429 1,591 942 109,062 OHIO 74,027 38,520 113,279 97,966 80,260 45,183 89,977 140,824 250,242 6,601 107,340 OKLAHOMA 32,500 45,117 56,900 61,857 758,329 109,979 123,272 220,136 19,116 52,838 556,345 REGON 499,103 826,337 28,013 1,394,551 38,568 294,945 840,765 693,409 42,633 47,243 87,844 PENNSYLVANIA 33,543 1,981,162 24,387 224,267 9,971 15,290 27,845 16,424 40,498 3,046 189,825 PUERTO RICO AND ERGIN ISLANDS 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 O 0 O 4,665 4,400 HODE ISLAND 298 10,541 175 0 9,975 0 0 2,940 1,620 0 2,145 .CAROLINA 1,300 167 796 157 - 694 17 1,434 59 2,849 625 300 .DAKOTA 1,149 1,046 511 811 536 457 457 460 572 4,140 1,978 ENNESSEE 28,187 192,529 43 10,749 5,253 4,864 9,651 7,588 310,926 496 768 EXAS 21,527 5,270 46,346 208,333 192,464 6,245 537,403 4,122,558 13,860 5,197,449 2,631,802 1, UTAH 140,000 31,000 2,200 2,300 0 0 500 500 1,500 700 34,326 ERMONT 2,000 2,952 535 1,362 6,295 --782 2,298 1,874 2,525 2,275 1,892 IRGINIA 0 1,186 3,265 87,703 124,709 5,375 11,243 10,035 1,686 124,553 18,683 ASHINGTON 7,720 113,407 65,444 98,808 86,774 1,039 62,403 258,333 357,877 54,343 87,844 .VIRGINA 31,450 44,054 9,088 354,265 49,269 458 18,592 7,406 76,882 40,152 98,580 WISCONSON 1,700 0 11 127 24 0 0 0 0 0 13,914 YOMING 545 6,492 0 10,637 91 62 779 2,603 4,424 1,373 22,095 OTALS 23,493,073 16,799,725 10,767,490 27,317,770 5,195,252 2,063,314 8,260,978 17,577,953 17,481,657 8,059,272 32,310,733 IERAGE 2,820 2,560 1,515 66,362 86,469 21,493 21,096 94,929 185,126 435,765 233,296 3,097 2,518 763 1,102 51,914 180,296 19,366 2,254 35,313 108,545 66,381 1,434 4,464 TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE SFY 1983-1993 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 AVERAGE ALABAMA 29,431 23,000 1,700 0 755 1,721 178 120,000 15,055 320 0 17,469 ALASKA 0 7,150 50 0 20,000 500 6,000 0 0 7,302 0 3,727 ARIZONA 179,938 223,000 1,350 3,000 7 71 33,636 3,220 258 5,189 228,900 61,688 ARKANSAS 500,000 5,000 19,823 2,240 15,045 12,612 2,320 143,056 12,006 909 2,680 65,063 CALIFORNIA 673,000 0 0 402,000 1,015 52,353 38,738 570 3,376 93,152 165,920 130,011 COLORADO 100 107,050 7,000 166 0 0 481 130 2,820 1,602 100 10,859 CONNECTICUT 0 81,700 0 0 5,000 0 800 10 16 10,366 0 8,899 DELAWARE 0 5,000 50 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 2 0 605 FLORIDA 0 200,000 30,000 7,275 645 50,350 2,109 500 0 41,938 2,080 30,445 GEORGIA 0 5,050 0 2,000 1,470 230 1,792 30,658 106,158 1,156 7,340 14,169 HAWAII 0 6,055 3,100 0 2,050 35,647 3,392 665 23,715 9,260 2,910 7,890 IDAHO 2,200 1,000 0 2,005 17 0 178 113 2,574 224 0 756 ILLONOIS 202,500 7,992 11,500 104,705 150,000 102 1,600 71,045 19,834 189 2,640,140 291,782 INDIANA 20,000 22,194 50,000 2,500 1,906 89 716 105,550 89,504 45,424 9,550 31,585 IOWA 0 600,550 50 45,307 16,755 0 7,286 351,401 195,703 50,800 5,740,000 637,077 KANSAS 0 50,050 5,000 181,700 152,000 0 3,394 2,048 16,551 10,127 551,070 88,358 KENTUCKY 100 180,236 460 25 68 250 27,445 5,664 9,034 46,870 4,980 25,012 LOUISIANA 651,000 6,550 8,050 1,515,250 1,175 8,708 322,118 115,901 221,720 4,191 4,020 259,880 MAINE 375 10,050 45 5,000 61,250 0 3,200 0 16,336 2,179 3,040 9,225 MARYLAND AND DISTRICT OF CLOUMBIA 100 10,015 50 0 51 0 1,600 23 48 339 0 1,111 MASSACHUSETTS 0 50,560 0 21,500 47,480 0 0 50 9,716 176 160 11,786 MICHIGAN 0 0 80,000 405,000 15 206 180 627 6,133 355 1,600 44,920 MINNISOTA 310 5,000 500 1,501 27,800 555 17,600 3,032 1,280 1,760 964,050 93,035 MISSISSIPPI 812,600 6,050 2,000 651 6,380 39,420 3,635 21,805 313,359 1,010 4,480 110,126 MISSOURI 50,000 96,293 100 ; 155,000 100,550 69 16,067 1,842 1,960 2,044 3,429,630 350,323 MONTANA 0 663 0 38,674 0 0 2,194 1,758 10,743 1,403 6,720 5,650 NEBRASKA 0 100,550 500 28,482 25,890 61 29,772 36,536 53,615 6,683 294,500 52,417 TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED, BY STATE S -FY 1983-1993 (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LOCATION FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91FYYFY 92 FY 93 AVERAGE NEVADA 1,000 0 0 20,650 13 12 23 51 2 1,621 0 2,125 NEW HAMPSHIRE 75 6,000 50 5,962 19,100 0 0 1,200 0 0 0 2,944 NEW JERSEY 0 334,200 0 0 17,050 50 1,600 1 16,002 500 0 33,582 NEW MEXICO 6,000 23,000 24,000 0 10 0 3,378 1,187 1,567 32,264 210 8,329 NEW YORK 0 217,500 24,700 30,820 75,275 230 38,271 6,530 19,603 1,862 55,480 42,752 N. CAROLINA 470 40,000 50 1,990 20,461 0 21,072 1,075 2,694 12,927 1,400 9,285 N. DAKOTA 0 5 0 315 4,943 0 16,000 0 32 413,600 39,536 OHIO 0 10,122 10,000 10,000 20,518 2 52,240 40,846 55,165 20,078 25,800 22,252 OKLAHOMA i 0 268,000 15,030 802,250 22,2501 3,437 2,121 40,650 - 90 10,871 44,720 109,947 OREGON j 7,300 52,900 50 33,900 9001 125 98 1,070 9,010 32 1,760 9,740 PENNSYLVANIA 0 75,500 100 71,540 28 62 7,106 792 8,342 1,805 440 15,065 PUERTO RICO AND VERGIN ISLANDS 0 0 52,500 67,369 1,850 11,001 0 65 16 90,127 5,300 20,748 RHODE ISLAND 0 5 0 0 550 0 0 50 174 16 0 72 S. CAROLINA 0 1,110 100 3,070 31,771 0 370 677 11,871 0 17,920! 6,081 S. DAKOTA 0 206,015 55 6,665 3 0 16 3,000 2,934 3,460 763,380 89,593 TENNESSEE 40,100 50,500 1,550 15,150 95 5,165 11,482 18,059 13,109 204 5,070 14,589 TEXAS 0 51,500 38,650 34,100 546,515 2,226 341,098 386,886 188,766 199,356 56,990 167,826 UTAH 500,000 50,500 0 479,000 250 0 15,403 56 6,005 24 160 95,582 VERMONT . 0 51,600 0 0 10,500 0 50 15,657 19 2 7,550 7,762 VIRGINIA 30 55,055 290 800,000 1,510 0 39,363 3,472 984 7,371 0 82,552 WASHINGTON 16,943 1,500 0 20,351 30,150 11 320 58,770 227,634 176 2,080 32,540 W. VIRGINA 0 229,000 1,050 600,000 125 1 1,010 8,930 908 5,791 620 77,040 WISCONSON 0 6,000 2,300 80,000 2,992 32 160 31,159 180 29,305 903,660 95,981 OMING 0 0 40,000 250 16 01 . 1,602 44 2,160 0 0 4,007 TOTALS 3,693,572 3,540,770 431,803 6,007,363 1,444,199 225,298 1,080,814 1,636,431 1,698,781 762,762 16,370,010 3,353,800 | 0, , INDEX A Abbapoola Creek, SC (SAN) 7-19 Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-23 Aberdeen Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Aberdeen, MS (SAM) 10-54 Aberdeen, OH (ORH) 17-22 Abescon Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Abilene, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Abiquiu Dam, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-14, 32-18 Absecon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Accotink Creek, VA (NAB) 4-39 Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SWA) 32-1, 32-12, 32-16 Ada County Unit (NPW) 39-17 Adams Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Adams, Hossic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG) 31-11 Addison, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-28 Adena, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 Adkin Branch, NC (SAW) 6-27, 6-30 Advance Engineering and Design Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-15 Detroit District (NCE) 21-46 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-12 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-10 Louisville District (ORL) 16-14 Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 New England Division (NED) 1-27 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Seattle District (NPS) 38-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-9 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Agana River, Guam (POD) 36-9 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Agat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Agua Frie River, Prescot Valley, AZ (SPL) 33-31 AIWW - Mooring Basins (SAW) 6-27 AIWW - New River Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-27 AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project (SAW) 6-27 AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut (SAW) 6-27 Akutan, AK (NPA) 40-17 Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA (SAM) 10-3, 10-30, 10-50 Alabama River at Montgomery, AL (SAM) 10-47, 10- Alameda Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Alamo Dam and Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ (SPL) 33-25 Alamo Dam, AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-15 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, NM (SWA) 32-19 Alamogordo, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12 Alamosa, CO (SWA) 32-2, 32-12, 32-16 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal, VA (NAO) 5-14 Albemarle Sound, NC (SAW) 6-28 Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NPS) 38-10, 38-18 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-13 Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 Alford, Green River, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-58 Algoma Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-2, 21-24, 21-70 Alhambra Creek, CA (SPK) 35-41 Aliso Creek Dam (SPL) 33-32 Allatoona Dam - Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-24, 10-34, 10-45 Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-23 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 18-23 Allegheny River, open channel work (ORP) 18-21 Allegheny River, PA (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17, 18-25 Allentown, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-29 Allenville, AZ (SPL) 33-30 Alley Bay, Beals, ME (NED) 1-49 Allison Lake (Valdez Hydropower), AK (NPA) 40-16 Alloway Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 Alma Harbor, WI 25-7 Almond Lake, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-29 Almond Village, NY (NAB) 4-42 I-1 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides*Parishes, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Aloha Rigolette, LA (LMK) 12-3, 12-10, 12-12 Alpena Harbor, MI (NCE).21-3, 21-48, 21-70 Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-14 Alpine, TX (SWA) 32-19 Alsea River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers (SAS) 8-2, 8-13, 8-15 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-13 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-52 Alton, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (LSM) 14-3, 14-9, 14-12 Alum Creek Lake, OH (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-30 Amazon Creek, OR (NPP) 37-38 Ambrose Channel (NAN) 2-28 American and Sacramento Rivers, CA (SPK) 35-35 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA (NPS) 38-26 American River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA (NCR) 23-13 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-59 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-13 Amite River and Tributaries, LA (LMN) 11-15 Amory, MS (SAM) 10-56 Amsterdam, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Anacortes Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-1, 38-14, 38-20, 30-30 Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-25 Anacostia River (NAB) 4-45 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-39 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co. MD (NAB) 4-41 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation, Improvements, DC & MD (NAB) 4-12, 4-27, 4-36 Anacostia River Basin (NAB) 4-44 Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-30 Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG) 31-9 Anchor Point, AK (NPA) 40-17 Anchorage Harbor (Uncompleted Portion), AK (NPA) 40-16 Anchorage Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-1, 40-9, 40-12 Anchorages, VA (NAO) 5-13 Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Andalusia Harbor, IL 25-7 Anderson, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-27 Anderson Park, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-16 Andover Lake, CT (NED) 1-52 Andrews River, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-28, 1-37, 1-61 Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO (LSM) 14-18 Annapolis Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-3, 4-25, 4-32 Ansonia-Derby, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-58 Antelope and Blackburn Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-45 Antelope Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-23 Antelope - Little Bear Creek, Eagle Point, OR (NPP) 37-42 Anthony Shoals, GA (SAS) 8-23 Apalachee Bay, FL to New Orleans, LA (SAM) 10-40 Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM) 10-4, 10-30, 10-36, 10-50 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA.(SAM) 10-4, 10-30, 15-48, 10-50 Apalachicola River to St. Andrew Bay (SAM) 10-39 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-10, 37-24, 37-33, 37-43 Appomattox River, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-8, 5-11, 5-15 Apponaug Cove, RI (NED) 1-44 Appoquinimink River, DE (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston District (SAN) 7-1, 7-10, 7-13, 7-17 Galveston District (SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-23 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35, 9-51 Mobile District (SAM) 10-6, 10-30, 10-36 New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-28, 1-37 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-15 New York District (NAN) 2-3, 2-18, 2-22 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-28 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-39 Savannah District (SAS) 8-2, 8-13, 8-15 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-2, 6-18, 6-24 Aquashicola Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-30 Aquia Creek, VA (NAB) 4-39 Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Ararat River, Mount Airy, NC (SAW) 6-26 Arcadia Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-48, 21-70 Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT) 29-2, 29-14, 29-20 Arch Creek, Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Archers Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 1-2 Archusa Creek, MS (SAM) 10-54 Ardsley, NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Area East of Albany, OR (NPP) 37-40 Area V, Estelline Springs, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14, 29-21 Area VIII, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14 Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-34 Arkansas City (SWT) 29-29 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK and TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-14, 29-22 Arkansas River and Tributaries, South Central, Southeast Areas, OK (SWT) 29-28 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS (SWL) 28-2, 28-14, 28-18 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS: Navigation 28-24, 28-25, 28-26, 28-27 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS; Lakes (SWL) 28-28 Arkansas River, Firestone Dam to Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-28 Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR (SWL) 28-21 Arkansas River, OK (SWT) 29-27 Arkport Dam, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-29 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR (NPP) 37-38 Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Arlington Lake, MO (MRK) 27-18 Arroyo Colorado, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-38 Arthur Kill Channel (NAN) 2-28 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR (SWL) 28-3 Asan Village, Guam (POD) 36-9 Ash, NC (SAW) 6-30 Asharoken Village, Northport, NY (NAN) 2-36 Ashland Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-4, 21-48, 21-70 Ashland, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Ashley River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Ashtabula Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-2, 20-15, 20-25 Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID (NPW) 39-15 Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA (NPW) 39-17 Asquiroga Bay, Guam (POD) 36-8 Astoria Turning Basin, OR (NPP) 37-36 Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA (LMN) 11-13 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN) 11-13 Atchinson, KS (MRK) 27-17 Athalia, OH (ORH) 17-22 Athens, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Atka, AK (NPA) 40-17 Atkinson Creek, Green County, MS (SAM) 10-49 Atlantic Beach Channels, NC (SAW) 6-24 Atlantic City, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB) 4-11 4-27, 4-36 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (NAO) 5-2, 5-8, 5-11, 5-14 (SAW) 6-2, 6-18, 6-22 (SAN) 7-2, 7-10, 7-13 (SAS) 8-3, 8-13, 8-15 (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35 Atlantic Ocean Channel to Thimble Shoal Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Atlantic Village, Staten Island, NY (NAN) 2-36 Auasi Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet (NCB) 20-43 Auburn Water Pump Facility, Auburn, NY (NCB) 20-45 Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH (NCB) 20-45 Augusta, KY (ORH) 17-21 Augusta LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25 Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NED) 1-54 Aunuu Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Aurora Harbor, Juneau, AK (NPA) 40-17 Aurora, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, CO (MRO) 26-20 AuSable Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-48, 21-70 Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Authorized Bridge Alteration New England Division (NED) 1-9 Avoca, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-29 Avon Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-28 Avon, OH (NCB) 20-44 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-28 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-20 Bachelor Island, WA (NPP) 37-40 Back Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, SD (MRO) 26-20 Bagaduce River, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-49 I-3 Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-38 Bainbridge, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Baker Brook, MA (NED) 1-52 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35 Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NED) 1-13, 1-31, 1-56 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB) 4-3, 4-25, 4-32, (NAO) 5-2, 5-8, 5-11, 5-17 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (Ferry Bar and Spring Garden Channel) (NAB) 4-42 Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-25, 4-33 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR (NPP) 37-36 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County (SPL) 33-33 Bar Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Bar Point Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Baraboo River, Rock Springs, WI (NCS) 24-30 Barataria Bay Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Barbour Creek, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-49 Barbourville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Barcelona Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-41 Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Barkley Dam and Lake, Barkley, KY and TN (ORN) 15-14 Barnard, KS (MRK) 27-17 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-21 Barnegat Light, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) (ORL) 16-30 Barre Falls Dam, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-31, 1-56 Barren River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-16, 16-33 Barrow, AK (NPA) 40-17 Bartley, NE (MRK) 27-1727-20 Bass Harbor Bar, ME (NED) 1-44 Bass Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Bassett Creek, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-19 Bastrop Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Batavia and Vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY (NCB) 20-43 Bath, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Baton Rouge Harbor Segment between Mi 2.5 and 5.0 (LMN) 11-16 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Baudette Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-23 Bay City Harbor, WI 25-7 Bay Ridge, Red Hook Channels, NY (NAN) 2-29 Bay River, NC (SAW) 6-24 Bay St. Louis Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-49 Bayard, WV (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Bayfield Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-85 Bayou Bartholomew, LA and MO (LMK) 12-16, 12-23 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-12, 12-19 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Bonfouca, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Choupique, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-30, 10-36, 10-50 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-30, 10-36, 10-50 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Dupre, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA (LMN) 11-16 Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-30, 10-36, 10-50 Bayou Lacombe, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA (LMK) 12-19 Bayou Pierre in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Rapides, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Rigolette, LA (LMN) 11-11 Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Teche & Vermillion River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Terrebonne, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Vermillion, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA (LMK) 12-16 Bayport, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Bayport Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-49, 21-70 Baytown, TX (SWG) 31-38 Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) New England Division (NED) 1-11 1-4 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction B8 Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-12 Charleston District (SAN) 7-8 Chicago District (NCC) 22-7 Detroit District (NCE) 21-39 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-21 New York District (NAN) 2-13 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-6, 5-9 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Beach Point, Truro, MA (NED) 1-54 Beal Slough, NE (MRO) 26-24 Beals Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Bear Creek, CA (SPL) 33-31 Bear Creek, County Road 485, Collin, TX (SWF.) 30-23 Bear Creek, County Route 276, Marion County, MO (NCR) 23-16 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT (NPS) 38-26 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID (NPW) 39-15 Bear Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-2, 26-10, 26-13 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Bear Creek, Medford, OR (NPP) 37-38 Bear River, CA (SPK) 35-41 Bear Stream, CA (SPK) 35-43 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-52 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-18 Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-18, 6-23 Beaver Bay, MN (NCE) 21-85 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Beaver Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-52 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA (SAM) 10-47 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR (NPP) 37-38 Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE (MRO) 26-24 Beaver Dam Creek - Damascus, VA (ORN) 15-18 Beaver Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Beaver Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-16, 28-30 Beaver Run/Walnut Creek, Millcreek, PA (NCB) 20-44 Beaver Slough, OR (NPP) 37-42 Beaverdam Creek, Clinton, NC (SAW) 6-30 Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA (MRK) 27-17 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 Beech Fork Lake, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Belfast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Belhaven Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-24 Belington, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22, 28-30 Bellaire, OH (ORP) 18-24 Bellamy River, NH (NED) 1-44 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River, SD (MRO) 26-20 Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD (MRO) 26-16 Belle River, MI (NCE) 21-85 Bellevue, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Bellingham Harbor (I&J Street Waterway), WA (NPS) 38-25 Bellingham Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-20 Bellville Point, GA (SAS) 8-21 Belpre, OH (ORH) 17-22 Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 Belton Lake Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 Belton Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP) 3-12, 3-19, 3-25 Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Bennett Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-23 Bennington Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-52 Bennington, VT (NAN) 2-16, 2-34 Benwood, WV (ORP) 18-22 Beresford Creek, SC (SAN) 7-19 Berkeley Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 Berkeley Marina, CA (SPN) 34-13 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-6, 18-13, 18-18, 18-28 Berrien County, MI (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-13 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-29 Bettendorf, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Betterton Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-42 Beverly Harbor, MA (NED) 1-44 Beverly Hills, McLennan County, TX (SWF) 30-23 I-5 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH (NCB) 20-44 Big and Little Sallisaw Navigation Project (SWT) 29-24 Big Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-49, 21-70 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-7, 26-12, 26-15, 26-19 Big Bend Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-24 Big Bend, WV (ORH) 17-23 Big Black River, MS (LMK) 12-16, 12-21 Big Blue Lake, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-34 Big Blue River, Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 Big Brown Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-21 Big Coulee to Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-31 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR (LMM) 13-7 Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN (LMM) 13-6 Big Darby, OH (ORH) 17-23 Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, CA (SPK) 35-39 Big Fork River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Big Fossil Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges, MT.(MRO) 26-20 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin, MT (MRO) 26-20 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA (LMN) 11-13 Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Big Pine Lake, TX (SWT) 29-25 Big River Reservoir, RI (NED) 1-52, Big Run, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Big Sandy Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Sandy River, WV & KY (ORH) 17-20 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-16 Big Sioux River/Dakota Dunes, SD (MRO) 26-25 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD (MRO) 26-20 Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh, SD (MRO) 26-20 Big Sioux River, Jefferson, SD (MRO) 26-20 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City, SD (MRO) 26-20 Big Sioux River, Plymouth County, IA (MRO) 26-23 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD (MRO) 26-20 Big Sioux River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-23 Big Sioux River, Union County, SD (MRO) 26-20 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN (ORN), 15-4, 15-9 Big Spring, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD (NCS) 24-5, 24-19 Big Stranger Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 Big Suamico Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-5, 21-49, 21-71 Big Sunflower River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Big Swan D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-18 Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO (MRO) 26-21 Big Timber Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Big Walnut Creek, 500 W. Putnam Co., IN (ORL) 16-38 Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-34 Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT (SPK) 35-39 Big Wills Creek, AL (SAM) 10-54 Big Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Billings, MT (MRO) 26-18 Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-7, 10-30, 10-37, 10-50 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Binghamton, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-29 Birch Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-31, 1-56 Birch Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14, 29-22 Birch, WV (ORH) 17-23 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-30 Biscayne Bay, FL Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-52 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (NPS) 38-26 Black Bayou Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-21 Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Black Creek, Ft. Defiance, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Black Creek, Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-47 Black Creek, Town of Chili, NY (NCB) 20-44 Black Fork at Hendricks, WV (ORP) 18-23 Black River (Alcona County), MI (NCE) 21-85 Black River (North Bend), WI (NCS) 24-29 Black River (Port Huron), MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-49, 21-70 Black River, Amsterdam Road, WI (NCS) 24-30 Black River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (SWL) 28-22 Black River Falls, WI (NCS) 24-29 1-6 Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI Authorized Dec. 17, 1979 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act (NCE) 21-87 Black River Harbor, MI (1936 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Black River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-49, 21-71 Black River Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-41 Black River Lake, WI (NCS) 24-26 Black River, NC (SAW) 6-24,6-26 Black River Obstruction Removal, Butler County, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14 Black River, Poplar bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR (SWL) 28-22 Black River, WI (NCS) 24-23, 24-26, 24-29, 24-30 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-15, 20-25 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Black Rock Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44 Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Black Rock Lake, CT (NED) 1-18, 1-33, 1-58 Black Walnut Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Black Walnut Point, MD (NAB) 4-41 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-8, 10-31, 10-37, 10-50 Black Warrior River, North Port, AL (SAM) 10-49 Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (SAM) 10-47 Black Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (SAW) 6-30 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE (MRO) 26-16, 26-21 Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK (SWT) 29-27 Blackfoot Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-17 Blackfoot River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT (NPS) 38-26 Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-15 Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI (NED) 1-11 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA (NED) 1-49 Blackstone River, Warwick, MA (NED) 1-56 Blackwater Dam, NH (NED) 1-20, 1-34, 1-59 Blackwater River, Milton, FL (SAM) 10-46, 10-50 Blackwater River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 Blaine Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (LMK) 12-18 Bldwn, Sqw Creek Lndr Swg Lgn, WY (MRO) 26-25 Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Block Island, RI (NED) 1-61 Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP) 3-12, 3-19, 3-25 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14, 28-28 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Blue River Lake, OR (NPP) 37-10, 37-24, 37-33, 37-43 Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-25 Bluegrass Creek, Audubon, IA (MRO) 26-24 Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Bluff Creek, MS (SAM) 10-46 Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA (NED) 1-12, 1-31, 1-41 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 41-1 Bodega Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 Bodie Island, NC (SAW) 6-27 Boeuf River, LA (LMK) 12-16 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-26 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-26 Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL (SAM) 10-18, 10-33, 10-43 Boggy Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Boise Valley, ID (NPW) 39-17 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL (SAM) 10-47 Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-29 Bolles Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-50, 21-71 Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-31, 10-38 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-24 Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA (NPP) 37-15, 37-26, 37-34, 37-44 Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (NPP) 37-2, 37-22, 37-29 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Bonum Creek, VA (NAB) 4-4, 4-25 Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) (ORL) 16-24 Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) (NED) 1-52 Boston Harbor, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-28, 1-37 Boswell Lake, OK (SWT) 29-25 1-7 Boulder, CO (MRO) 26-18 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-49 Bowie County Levee, TX (SWT) 29-28 Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (MRO) 26-3, 26-10, 26-13 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (ORP) 18-24. Bradenton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Bradford, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Bradford, TN (LMM) 13-6 Bradley Lake, AK (NPA) 40-16 Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA (SAW) 6-30 Bramwell, WV (ORH) 17-24 Branch Creek, Del City, OK (SWT) 29-27 Branford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA (NAB) 4-39 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA (NED) 1-52 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 Brays Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Brazos Island Harbor, (SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-23, 31-39, 31-40, 31-45 Brazos River, Velasco to Old Washington, TX (SWG) 31-38 Breton Bay, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Brevard County, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-32, 9-46 Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Bridge, Mary Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) (NPP) 37-36 Bridgewater, VA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Brigantine Island (NAP) 3-29 Brilliant, OH (ORP) 18-24 Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI (NED) 1-44 Broad Creek, Beaufort, NC (SAW) 6-26 Broad Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Broad Creek River, DE (NAB) 4-39 Broad Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Broadkill River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Broadwater Creek, MD (NAB) 4-42 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Brockway Lake, VT (NED) 1-52 Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin ) (ORP) 18-24 Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-24 Broken Bow, Mud Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Bromley, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Bronx River, NY (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 Brookgreen Gardens, SC (SAN) 7-17 Brooklyn, WV (ORH) 17-22 Brookport, IL (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Brookville, IN (ORL) 16-39 Brookville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-6, 16-16 Brookville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ) 9- 16, 9-32, 9-46 Browder Creek, Springton, TX (SWF) 30-23 Browns Creek (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 Brunswick County Beaches (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line), NC (SAW) 6-26 Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion - Berm, NC (SAW) 6-27 Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-13, 8-15 Brush Creek, Jeanette, PA (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-28 Buck Creek, NC & SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Buckhannon River, WV (ORP) 18-21 Buckhannon, WV (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Buckhorn Lake, KY (ORL) 16-6, 16-16, 16-33 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Bucksport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Buena Vista, OH (ORH) 17-22 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-11, 31-20, 31-35 Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-20 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Scranton, ND (MRO) 26-16 Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY (NCB) 20-46 Buffalo Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-15, 20-26 Buffalo, Johnson County, Diversion Channel, WY (MRO) 26-18 Buffalo River, MS (LMK) 12-23 Buffalo Ship Channel, Buffalo, NY (NCB) 20-46 1-8 Buffalo Small Boar Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-15, 20-27 Buffumville Lake, MA (NED) 1-23, 1-35, 1-60 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-34 Bull Run, PA (NAB) 4-41 Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-17, 28-30 Bullocks Point Cove, RI (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Bunker Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning, CA (SPK) 35-45 Burch Creek, Weber County, UT (SPK) 35-39 Burgettstown, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-48 Burketts Creek, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-47, 10-49 Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Burlington Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-29 Burlington, IA (NCR) 23-14 Burns Stream, CA (SPK) 35-43 Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21 Burns Waterway SBH, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21 Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Burt-Washington Counties, NE (MRO) 26-23 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO (SWL) 28-22 Butler, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Buttahatchee Creek, MS (SAM) 10-48 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA (NED) 1-44 Buttermilk Channel, NY (NAN) 2-29 Butternut Creek, East Syracuse, NY (NCB) 20-45 Bypass Levees, CA (SPK) 35-44 Byram River at Pemberwick, CN (NAN) 2-32 C Cabrillo Beach (SPL) 33-30 Cache Creek Basin, (Cache Creek Settling Basin), CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-25, 35-28, 35-35 Cache Creek, CA (SPL) 33-31 Cache La Poudre River, Greely, CO (MRO) 26-24 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, CO (MRO) 26-21 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant), CO (MRO) 26-20 Cache River Diversion, IL (LSM) 14-16 Cache River Levee, IL (ORL) 16-35 Cache River, Upper Basin, IL (ORL) 16-25 Caddo Lake Dam, LA (LMK) 12-21 Caddo Lake, LA (LMK) 12-19 Cadet Bayou, MS (SAM) 10-46, 10-50 Cadle Creek, MD (NAB) 4-42 Caesar Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-6, 16-16, 16-33 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (ORL) 16-6, 16-16, 16-33 Cairo, WV (ORH) 17-24 Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II, Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-13 Calapooya River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-28 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA (LMN) 11-13 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA (LMN) 11-13 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA (LMN) 11-13 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA (LMN) 11-13 Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT (NED) 1-48 Calhoun County (SAM) 10-54 Caliente Creek, CA (SPK) 35-35 Caliente Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-31 California (Cincinnati), OH (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Calion, AR (H.K. Thatcher) (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 Calispell Creek, WA (NPS) 38-29 Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX (SWF) 30-23 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21, 22-23 Calumet River Bridges (NCC) 22-22 Camas Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-42 Cambridge Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-25, 4-30 Cambridgeport Lake, VT (NED) 1-52 Camden Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Camelsback Dam (Gila River) (SPL) 33-31 Camp Facility, Red River, Telephone TX (SWT) 29-27 Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-25 Camp Perry, OH (NCB) 20-43 Campbells Island, Mississippi River, IL (NCR) 23-13 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-45 Canal 43, AR (LMK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-12 Canapitsit Channel, MA (NED) 1-44 1-9 Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY (NCB) 20-45 Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-27, 9-35 Candy Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-22 Cane River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Caney Creek, MS (LMK) 12-12 Caney Fork River, Carthage, TN (ORN) 15-18 Caney Fork River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Canisteo, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Cannon River at Fairbault, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Cannon River near Welch, MN (NCS) 24-30 Cannonball River, Sheilds, ND (MRO) 26-25 Cano Cacul, Aguidilla, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Cano Madre Vieja, Aguidilla, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Canton (Nimishillen), OH (ORH) 17-24 Canton Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Canton Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-15, 29-22, 29-26 Canton, MA (NED) 1-49 Canton, MO (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Canyon County Unit (NPW) 39-17 Canyon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cape Charles, VA (NAO) 5-15 Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-28, 1-38 Cape Fear River, Above Wilmington, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-18 Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-29 Cape Florida State park, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO (LSM) 14-4, 14-9, 14-12 Cape Girardeau, MO No. 2, MO (LSM) 14-16 Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LSM) 14-18 Cape Henry Channel, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-13 Cape Lookout, NC (SAW) 6-27 Cape May City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (NAP) 3-11, 3-19, 3-25 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-41 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Carlyle Lake, IL (LSM) 14-16 Carneros Creek, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-17 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-20 Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-13 Carr Fork Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-16, 16-33 Carrabelle Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-46, 10-50 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-13 Carrollton, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Carters Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-15 Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM) 10-25, 10-34 Caruthersville Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-5 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (NED) 1-44 Cascadia Lake, OR (NPP) 37-40 Caseville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-50, 21-71 Caseyville, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Cashie River, NC (SAW) 6-24 Casino Beach, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-14, 22-19 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO (MRO) 26-18 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Cathance River, ME (NED) 1-44 Catherine Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Catherine Creek, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Cathlamet, WA (NPP) 37-36 Cattail Branch, Clinton, NC (SAW) 6-30 Cattaraugus Creek, NY (NCB) 20-41 Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY (NCB) 20-45 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-27 Cattlesburg, KY (ORI) 17-21, 17-24 Cave-in-Rock, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Cave Run Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-16, 16-33 Cave Springs, GA (SAM) 10-54 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY (NCB) 20-43 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (ORL) 16-7, 16-17, 16-33 Cedar Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-16 Cedar Creek at Cedar Lodge, NE (MRO) 26-24 Cedar Creek, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Cedar Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-21 Cedar Creek, Spaulding, NE (MRO) 26-25 Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-15 Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-53 Cedar Key Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cedar Point, GA (SAS) 8-21 Cedar Point Lake, KS (SWT) 29-26 Cedar River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 1-10 Cedar River, Kenton, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Cedar River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Celina Dam, KY (ORN) 15-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-21, 9-33, 9-48 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA (NCR) 23-13 Century Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-22, 20-39 Ceredo-Kenova, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Chagrin River, East Branch, Route 84, OH (NCB) 20-45 Chambersburg, OH (ORH) 17-22 Champaign Creek, CA (SPL) 33-31 Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT (NAN) 2-29 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD (NAB) 4-42 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, NC (SAW) 6-24 Channel Connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-15 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-27, 9-35 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, NC (SAW) 6-24 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-15 Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-19 Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG) 31-9 Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-8, 5-11, 5-15 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX(SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-24, 31-39 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI (NCE) 21-85 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30 Chappaqua, NY (NAN) 2-16 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) (MRK) 27-17, 27-18 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only (MRK) 27-1 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Charleroi, PA (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA (NED) 1-12, 1-31 Charles River Dam, MA (NED) 1-49 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-36 Charleston Harbor (Anchorage Basin), SC (SAN) 7-19 Charleston Harbor, Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-41 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC (SAN) 7-3, 7-10, 7-14 Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-2, 7-10, 7-13 Charlestown, NH (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Charlevoix Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-7, 21-50, 21-71 Charlotte County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-27, 9-35 Chartiers Creek, PA (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-29 Chaska, MN (NCS) 24-5, 24-19 Chatfield Lake, CO (MRO) 26-3, 26-10, 26-13 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-28, 1-38, 1-61 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-47 Chattahoochee River, Franklin, GA (SAM) 10-49 Chattooga River, Trion, GA (SAM) 10-49 Chattooga Units, GA (SAS) 8-23 Chauvin Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-11, 12-13 Cheat River, WV (ORP) 18-21 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Isle Royale, MI (NCE) 21-85 Cheesequake Creek (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA (LMN) 11-13 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA (NPS) 38-26 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-26 Chehalis River, Salzer Creek, WA (NPS) 38-31 Chena River Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-13 Cherokee County, GA (SAM) 10-54 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Cherry Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-3, 26-10, 26-13, 26-19 Cherryfield, ME (NED) 1-49 Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE, (NAP) 3-2, 3-17, 3-21 Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD (NAB) 4-12, 4-27, 4-37 1- 11 Chesapeake, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chesconessex Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Chesire, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chester, CA (SPK) 35-39 Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-42 Chester River, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-25, 4-33, Chetco River, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-22, 37-29 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR (NPP) 37-38 Chicago Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-3, 22-13, 22-17, 22-21 Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-4, 22-13, 22-18, 22-21 Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (NCC) 22-7, 22-15 Chicago Shoreline, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-14 Chickasaw Bouge Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL (SAM) 10-47 Chickasawhay River, MS (SAM) 10-54 Chickasha, OK (SWT) 29-27, 29-29 Chico Landing, CA (SPK) 35-41 Chicopee Falls, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Chicopee, MA (NED) 1-96, 1-57 Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-23 Chignik, AK (NPA) 40-17 Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK (SWT) 29-29 Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Chilo, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chincoteague Bay, VA (NAO) 5-15 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA (NAO) 5-15 Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-8, 5-11, 5-17 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royal, MI (NCE) 21-85 Chippewa River, Montevideo, MN (NCS) 24-30 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Choctawatchee Bay to Pensacola, FL (SAM) 10-39 Choctawatchee Bay to West Bay, FL (SAM) 10-39 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL (SAM) 10-46 Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK (SWT) 29-26 Chowan River, NC (NAO) 5-15 Chowan River, NC (SAW) 6-24 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-51 Christopher Creek, CA (SPL) 33-31 Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Cibolo Creek, TX (SWA) 32-19 Cilley Creek, Cincinnati, OH (ORL) 16-38 Cincinnati, OH (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Cincinnatus, NY (NAB) 4-44 City Creek Levee, San Bernardino County, CA (SPL) 33-31 City Dam, Little Caney River, KS (SWT) 29-27 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-16 City of Douglas, AZ (SPL) 33-31 City of Isleton, CA (SPK) 35-45 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR (NPP) 37-38 Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-30 Clairborne County Port, MS (LMK) 12-16 Clairborne Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clanton, AL (SAM) 10-47 Clanton Creek, GA (SAM) 10-54 Claremont Lake, NH (NED) 1-52 Claremore, OK (SWT) 29-29 Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO (LSM) 14-7, 14-10, 14-14 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (ORL) 16-8, 16-17 Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR (LMM) 13-7 Clarington, OH (ORP) 18-24 Clarion River, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, Drummond, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, Superior, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, Vicinity of Plains, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Clark Maritime Center, Jeffersonville, IN (ORL) 16-38 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA (NED) 1-48 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek (MRO) 26-16 Clarksville, AR (SWL) 28-22 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) , 37-40 Clatskanie River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 1-12 Clayton County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County, Elkport, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road Creek, Site 2, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road Creek CiX, Site 1, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road, NW, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton, IA (NCS) 24-30 Clear & Burnt River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX (SWG) 31-38 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 Clear Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-20, 31-35 Clear River, Burrilville, RI (NED) 1-49, 1-56 Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL) 28-5, 28-15, 28-30 Clearwater Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-26 Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-27 Cleves, OH (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (NED) 1-48 Clifton, AZ (SPL) 33-10, 33-17 Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Clifton, WV (ORH) 17-22 Clifty Creek Lake, IN (ORL) 16-28 Clinch River, TN and VA (ORN) 15-13 Clinton Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44 Clinton Harbor, IA 25-7 Clinton, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Clinton, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-8, 21-51, 21-71 Cloucester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-54 Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Clyde, RI (NED) 1-52 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN (ORN) 15-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Coal Grove, OH (ORH) 17-22 Coal River, WV (ORH) 17-21 Coan River, VA (NAB) 4-42 Coast of California, Point Mugu, to San Pedro Breakwater, CA (SPL) 33-30 Coasters Island Harbor, RI (NED) 1-44 Cobscook Bay, ME (NED) 1-44 Cocheco River, NH (NED) 1-44, 1-49, 1-61 Cochiti Lake, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-14, 32-18 Cochiti Wetfields, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12, 32-16 Cochrane, Mississippi River, WI (NCS) 24-29 Cockrells Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Coeur d'Alene River (North Fork), ID (NPS) 38-31 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID (NPS) 38-26 Coeur d'Alene, Springston, ID (NPS) 38-26 Coffee County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Coffee Creek, WA (NPS) 38-26 Cohansey River, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Cohasset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-44 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory 43-1 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-17 Coldwater Creek, MO (LSM) 14-4, 14-12 Colebrook River Lake, CT (NED) 1-14, 1-31, 1-56 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Colfax, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-14 Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 Detroit District (NCE) 21-47 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 Galveston District (SWG) 31-18 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-10 Louisville District (ORL) 16-14 Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 New England Division (NED) 1-27 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-7, 5-10 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 1-13 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25" San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Seattle District (NPS) 38-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-9 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17 Colliers, WV (ORP) 18-29 Collinsville, AL (SAM) 10-47 Collinsville, CA (SPK) 35-41 Colonial Beach, MD (NAB) 4-12, 4-27, 4-36 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (SPK) 35-45 Colorado River at Riverside, CO (SPK) 35-45 Colorado River, Matagorda, TX (SWG) 31-38 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, CO (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 32-19 Colquitt County, GA (SAM) 10-54 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-22, 37-29, 37-41 Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and WA (NPP) 37-16, 37-26, 37-34 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL (LSM) 14-16 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Columbia, LA (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA (NPW) 39-15 Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA (NPP) 37-3, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA (NPP) 37-4, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-2, 39-12 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-29 Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR (NPP) 37-4, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA (NPP) 37-36 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles, 37-26 Project), OR and WA (NPP) 37-16, 37-26, 37-34 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla District) (NPW) 39-4, 39-10, 39-13 Columbia River, Kalama, WA OR (NPP) 37-41 Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA (NPP) 37-41 Columbia Slough, OR (NPP) 37-40 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-21 Columbus, IN (ORL) 16-25 Columbus, Loup River, NE (MRO) 26-21 Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-54 Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-22 Colusa, CA (SPK) 35-41 Comite River, LA (Diversion) (LMN) 11-3, 11-8, 11-11 Compo Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-48 Conant Brook Dam, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-32, 1-56 Conchas Lake, NM (SWA) 32-3, 32-13 Concordia, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Conetoe Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Coney Island Channel (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Coney Island Creek (NAN) 2-34 Congaree River, SC (SAN) 7-19 Conklin-Kirkwood, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Conneaut Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-4, 20-16, 20-30 Conneaut Lake, PA (detalied project report) (ORP) 18-30 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT (NED) 1-52 Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes, West River, VT (NED) 1-15, 1-32, 1-41 Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT (NED) 1-12, 1-56 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (NED) 1-4, 1-28, 1-38, 1-61 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT (NED) 1-14, 1-32, 1-41 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-49, 1-55 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH (NED) 1-49 Connell, WA (NPW) 39-16 Connellsville, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Township, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 1-14 Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Township, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Connoquenessing Creek, Sewickley Township, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Conoho Creek, NC (SAW) 6-27 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 42-1 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORP) 18-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORD) 19-1, 19-5, 19-6 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORL) 16-2 Contentnea Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-26, 6-27 Continuation of Planning and Engineering Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-10 Mobile District (SAM) 10-32 Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Conway County Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 8, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Cook Inlet Shoals, AK (NPA) 40-15 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-3, 7-10, 7-14 Cooper River, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC (SAN) 7-19 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC (SAN) 7-18 Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR (NPP) 37-36 Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-23, 37-30 Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-49, 10-54 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-4, 10-30 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA (SAM) 10-54 Copan Lake, OK (SWT) 29-45 29-15, 29-22 Copes Corner Lakes, NY (NAB) 4-42 Coquille River, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-23, 37-31, 37-40, 37-41 Coralville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-10, 23-17 Coraopolis, PA (ORP) 18-24 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Cordele Creek & Malcolm Branch, GA (SAM) 10-54 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cordova, AK (NPA) 40-13 Cordova Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Core Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Corning-Monkey Run, NY (NAB) 4-44 Corning, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 Cornucopia Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-8, 21-51, 21-72 Corporation Gulch, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-25 Corpus Christi Beach (Restoration Project), TX (SWG) 31-10, 31-20, 31-35 Corpus Christi, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal, TX (SWG) 31-38 Corpus Christi Channel, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-19, 31-24, 31-39, 31-40, 31-45 Corsica River, MD (NAB) 4-39 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-29 Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Corte Madre Creek, CA (SPK) 35-7, 35-29, 35-36 Cortland, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Cottonwood Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID (NWP) 39-16 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-17 Cottonwood Creek near Walker Lake Community, NV (SPK) 39-15, 35-45 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL (LMM) 13-6 Cotuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52 Cougar Lake, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) (MRO) 26-17 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) (MRO) 26-16 Council Bluffs, IA (MRO) 26-19 Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-22 County Bridge, Elk River, Elk City, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Bridge, Washita River, Arkansas City, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS (SAM) 10-47 County Road, (Sec. 2), Deer Creek, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Road 55, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 10-49 County Road, Tyner Creek, Adair (SWT) 29-28 County Road, Washita River, Caddo City, OK (SWT) 29-28 1-15 County Road, Washita River, Caddo, OK Courtnay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cove Island, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-48 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-58 Covington County, MS (SAM) 10-54 Covington, KY (ORL) 16-24, Cow Castle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Cow Creek, Comache, OK (SWT) 29-28 . Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS (SWT) 29-26 Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-30 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA (NPP) 37-37 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA (NPP) 37-40 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Cowpens Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18 Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS (SWT) 29-27 Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPL) 33-31 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Coyote Creek (Known as Coyote and Berryessa Creeks), CA (SPK) 35-25, 35-35, 35-39 Coyote Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) Channel Improvement below Dam on Lower 98 miles of Russian River, CA (SPK) 35-43, 35-44 Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA (NPS) 38-30 Crabtree Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Craig, AK (NPA) 40-17 Craig Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Cranes Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Crawford County Levee District, AR (SWL) 28-22 Creede, Willow Creek, CO (Floodway) (SWA) 32-19 Crescent City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-33, 10-43 Criehaven Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-38 Crooked Creek, J. Paul Park, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-38 Crooked Creek Lake and Levee, AR (SWL) 28-23 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Crooked Creek, Union County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Crookston, MN (NCS) 24-32 Cross Creek, Fayetteville, NC (SAW) 6-30 Cross Florida Barge Canal, (SAJ) 9-4, 9-28, 9-36 Cross Lake, NY (NCB) 20-44 Cross Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-44 Cross Village, MI (NCE) 21-85 Crow River, Rockford, MN (NCS) 24-30 Crows Nest Channel, NC (SAW) 6-28 Crutcho Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-28 Crystal River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-7 33-16, 33-25 Cuckold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-42 Cuivre River, MO (LSM) 14-15 Cumberland County Streams, NC (SAW) 6-30 Cumberland, KY (ORN) 15-9 Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-3, 4-27, 4-37, 4-44 Cumberland River above Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cumberland River Metro Nashville Landfill (ORN) 15-18 Cumberland River NES Transmission Tower (ORN) 15-18 Cumberland River, TN and KY (ORN) 15-2, 15-9, 15-11, 15-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-48 Cunninghill Cove, MD (NAB) 4-42 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Current River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (SAS) 8-22 Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-30 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR (NPP) 37-36 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (NED) 1-5, 1-29, 1-38, 1-61 1-16 Cuyahoga River Basin, OH (NCB) 20-43 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Road, OH (NCB) 20-45 Cuyahoga River, Tinkers Creek, OH (NCB) 20-44 Cuyahoga River, West Creek, Independence, OH (NCB) 20-44 Cypress Bayou and Waterway Between Jefferson, TX and Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-16 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA (LMN) 11-13 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY (ORL) 16-35 Cypress Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Cypress Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-36 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 D Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-33, 9-47 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-33, 9-47 Dale County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 Dallas Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 Dam "A" Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS (SWT) 29-28 Dam Safety Program (ORN) 15-7 Damariscotta River, ME (NED) 1-44 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plan, NC (SAW) 6-26 Dana Point, Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-30 Danbury, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-58 Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-43 Danville, VA (SAW) 6-30 Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17 Darien Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-21 Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-31, 10-38, 10-50 Dauphin Island Shoreline (SAM) 10-33 Davenport Center Lake, NY (NAB) 4-42 Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) 25-7 Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-13 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR (SWL) 28-3 Davids Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-18 Davis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Davis, NC (SAW) 6-27 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) (NPP) 37-38 Dayton, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Dayton, Touchet River, WA (NPW) 39-16 Dayton, WY (MRO) 26-18 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD (MRO) 26-17 Deadman's Run, NE (MRO) 26-24 Dearmenville and Golden Springs, AL (SAM) 10-54 Deauthorization Projects New England Division (NED) 1-27 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Decorah, (Dry Run), IA (NCS) 24-29 Deep Creek, Accomack County, VA (NAO) 5-15 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, NC (SAW) 6-26 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Deep River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Deer Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-44 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-16 DeGray Lake, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-14 Delaware Bay to Lebanon Jetties and entrance at mouth (NAP) 3-27 Delaware Bay to Millville, Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project (NAP) 3-27 Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP) 3-13, 3-20, 3-25 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 17-12, 17-17 Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-17, 3-21 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-30 Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-17, 3-21 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing (NAP) 3-27 Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ (NAP) 3-5, 3-17, 3-22 Delphi, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 1-17 Dennis Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR (NPP) 37-38 Depoe Bay, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-23, 37-31, 37-36, 37-42 Depot Slough, OR (NPP) 37-42 DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-29 . Derby, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-58 Derby, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Des Lacs River, Burlington, ND (NCS) 24-30 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Deschutes River, Bend, OR (NPP) 37-38 Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Tumwater, WA (NPS) 38-26 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-26 Detour Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Detroit River, MI (NCE) 21-8, 21-51, 21-72, 21-89 Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1950 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Devil, East Twin and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements and Lytle Creek Levee (SPL) 33-32 Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-24, 24-32 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dice Grove, Lampasas River, Bell County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME (NED) 1-52 Dickinson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Dierks Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-29 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Diking District 5, Catsop County, (NPP) 37-37 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Dillingham Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 Disaster Preparedness Kansas City District (MRK) 27-8 Dismal Swamp Canal (Canal Creek), VA (NAO) 5-14 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills), NC (NAO) 5-14 District of Columbia & MD Projects (NAB) 4-45 Dively Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Dixie Creek, GA (SAM) 10-54 Dodge City, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-31, 10-39 Doheny Beach State Park, CA (SPL) 33-30 Domonakas Library, Sheffield, OH (NCB) 20-45 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (NED) 1-44 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Dorena Lake, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Double Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Double Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Douglas Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-17 Dover, KY (ORH) 17-22 Downyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-34 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Drainage District No. 13, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Drayton Hall, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Drinkwater Sewer, MO (LMM) 13-6 Drum Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Drury Drainage District, II (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (SPK) 35-31, 35-43, 35-44 Dry Creek, Goodlettsbille, TN (ORN) 15-18 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA (MRO) 26-17 Dry Creek, WA (NPW) 39-16 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO (MRK) 27-18 Dry Pass, AK (NPA) 40-15 Dry Run, IA (NCS) 24-24 DuBois, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Dubuque Harbor, IA 25-7 Dubuque, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 1-18 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN (ORL) 16-38 Duck Creek, Garland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA (SPK) 35-39 Duck Creek, Scott County, Davenport, and Bettendorf, IA (NCR) 23-15 Duck Island Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44 Duck Point Cove, MD (NAB) 4-44 Duck River, TN (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carrollton, TX (SWF) 30-23 Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (NCE) 21-9, 21-51, 21-73 Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Duncan Creek, Bloomer, WI (NCS) 24-30 Dungeness River, Area #5, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dunkirk Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-5, 20-16, 20-30 Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 (NCB) 20-46 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden (SAS) 8-22 Duval County, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-32, 9-47 Duxbury Harbor, MA (NED) 1-44 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-18 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID (NPW) 39-17 Dyersburg, TN (LMM) 13-6 Dymers Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 E Eagle Creek Lake, KY (ORL) 16-25 Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH (ORP) 18-24 Eagle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Eagle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX (SWG) 31-38 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-25 East Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 East Branch Dam, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-58 East Brimfield Lake, MA (NED) 1-23, 1-35, 1-59 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 East Chester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 East End Dauphin Island, FL (SAM) 10-18 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, IA (MRO) 26-23 East Fork of Clarks River, KY (ORN) 15-18 East Fork, TX (SWF) 30-22 East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County), IN (ORL) 16-36 East Harbor State Park, OH (NCB) 20-44 East Hartford, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-57 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 East Moline, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14; East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 East Muddy Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-17 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, IA (MRO) 26-23 East Nishnabotna River, Page Bny Brdg., IA (MRO) 26-25 East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex, IA (MRO) 26-23 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-23 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM) 10-11, 10-31, 10-39 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 East Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-15 East Peoria Sanitary District, IL (NCR) 23-14 East Point, LA (LMK) 12-21 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL) 28-22 East Rainelle, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 East River (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-18, 2-22, 2-28, 2-34 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 2-16, 2-31, 2-34 East Sidney Lake, NY (NAB) 4-17, 4-29 East St. Louis and Vicinity. IL (LSM) 14-4, 14-9, 14-12 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 1-19 Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 Eastpoint Channel, FL (SAM) 10-48 Eastport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-52 Eau Galle River, WI (NCS) 24-5, 24-19 Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-28, 9-36 Echo Bay Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Edenton Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-24 Edgartown Harbor, MA (NED) 1-44 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Edisto River, North Fork, SC (SAN) 7-18 Edisto River, SC (SAN) 7-17, 7-18 . Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC (SAN) 7-18 Ediz Hook, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-20 Edmonds Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25 Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NED) 1-20, 1-34, 1-59 Eel River at Sandy Prairie, CA (SPN) 34-14 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN (ORL) 16-35 Eel River, CA (SPK) 35-41 Egegik River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Eight Mile Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY (ORL) 16-36 Eighteenmile Creek, Boston, NY (NCB) 20-45 Eire Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-22 El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS (SWT) 29-26 El Paso, TX (SWA) 32-3, 32-13, 32-16 El Turque Beach, Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-52 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-45 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12 Eldred, IL (LSM) 14-18 Eldred, PA (ORP) 18-29 Elfin Cove, AK (NPA) 40-15 Elizabeth, NJ (NAN) 2-16, 2-32, 2-34 Elizabeth River, Hillside, NJ (NAN) 2-36 Elizabethtown, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-31 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD (NAB) 4-39 Elk City Lake (Table Mound), KS (SWL) 28-28 Elk City Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-22, 29-26 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS (MRK) 27-17 . , Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Elk Creek, Jackson, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33 Elk Creek, Nutter Fort, WV (detailed project report) (ORP) 18-30 Elk Creek, Willis, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elk River, AL and TN (ORN) 15-13 Elk River, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29, 24-30 Elk River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elkhorn River, Ewing, Holt County, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elkhorn River, Near Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elkins, WV (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 Elkland, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Elkport, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, NC (SAW) 6-26 Ellicott Creek, NY (NCB) 20-12, 20-22, 20-39 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, NC (SAW) 6-26 Elm Creek, Burt County, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elm Creek, Decatur, NE (MRO) 26-21 Elm Fork Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 Elmira, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-29 Elochoman Slough, WA (NPP) 37-36 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY (LMM) 13-5 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (NPS) 38-26 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Embarrass River, St. Marie, IN (ORL) 16-38 Emergency Bank Protection Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-13 Emergency Bank Protection for Certain Highway and Railroad Facilities at Price Landing, MO (LSM) 14-16 Emergency Flood Control Activities Norfolk District (NAO) 5-7, 5-10 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Emergency Protection for Illinois Approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge. IL (LSM) 14-16 Emergency Repairs to Levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (LSM) 14-16 Emergency Shore Protection Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 1-20 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Galveston District (SWG) 31-17 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (NCS) 24-24 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) (SWL) 28-3 Emory River, Harriman, TN (ORN) 15-18 Empire-Stratton, OH (ORP) 18-24 Enderlin, Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Engineer Topographic Laboratories 46-1 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 English, IN (Little Blue River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Enid Diversion Channel, OK (SWT) 29-27 Enid LPP, OK (SWT) 29-25 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Entiat River, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-29 Environmental Data Studies Albuquerque District (NPA) 32-12 Environmental Restoration, White River Wetlands, AR and MO (SWL) 28-9, 28-16 Erie Harbor, PA (NCB) 20-5, 20-17, 20-31 Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Escambia Bay, FL (SAM) 10-50 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL (SAM) 10-46 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-43 Esquatel Coulee, Mesa, WA (NWP) 39-16 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Essex River, MA (NED) 1-44,1-61 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Etna, PA (ORP) 18-29 Eufaula Lake, OK, (SWL) 28-28 Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-24, 29-26 Evansdale, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Evanston, IL (NCC) 22-22 Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-3, 16-15, 16-30, 16-35 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-20, 38-29 Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Exeter River, NH (NED) 1-44 Existing leveees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA (LMK) 12-18 Fabius River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK (NPA) 40-16 Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-17 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK) 35-8, 35-29 Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Fairport Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-5, 20-17, 20-31 Fajardo Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-51 Falcon/Little Eagle Creeks, IN (ORL) 16-38 Falfurrias, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-21, 31-36 Fall Brook Lake, PA (NAB) 4-42 Fall Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-12, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Fall River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-3, 26-10, 26-13 Fall River Harbor, MA (NED) 1-44 Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Fall River Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-16, 29-22, 29-26 Fall River Lake, KS, (SWL) 28-28 Falls Lake, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-15, 6-20 Falmouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-44 Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA (SAS) 8-21 Far Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24 Fargo, ND (NCS) 24-29 Farm Creek, IL (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX (SWF) 30-23 Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL (NCR) 23-13 Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Farmington, Des Moines River, IA (NCR) 23-16 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (NED) 1-15, 1-32, 1-41 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fayette County, GA (SAM) 10-54 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN (ORL) 16-38 Feather River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Felsenthal, AR (LMK) 12-15, 12-16 Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NPP) 37-12, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 1-21 Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-28, 9-36 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Filberts Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA (NAO) 5-15 Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-18, 2-22, 2-31 Fire Island to Montauk Point, NY (NAN) 2-13, 1-16, 1-20, 1-26 Fish River, Baldwin County, AL (SAM) 10-49 Fish Weircreek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Fishing Bay, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Fishing Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Fishing Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV (ORH) 17-24, Fishpond Drain and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-54 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) (NED) 1-49 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Flat Branch, Gulfport, MS (SAM) 10-49 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT (NPS) 38-26 Flathead River, MT (NPS) 38-25, 38-26 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-26 Flatrock River, Rush County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-1, 13-4 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 New England Division (NED) 1-55 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Flood Control Projects Under Construction B-I Flood Control Reservoir Operations New England Division (NED) 1-26 Flood Control Reservoirs Operable A-1 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Chicago District (NCC) 22-11 Detroit District (NCE) 21-42 Galveston District (SWG) 31-17 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-8 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-6 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-9 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-24 Nashville District (ORN) 15-6 New England Division (NED) 1-26 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 New York District (NAN) 2-16 Omaha District (MRO) 26-7 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-13 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 Seattle District (NPS) 38-8 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-9 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-14 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented G-1 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR (NPP) 37-40 Florence LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT (NPS) 38-26 Floyd County, GA (SAM) 10-54 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-17 Flushing Bay and Creek, NY (NAN) 2-29 Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM) 10-11, 10-31, 10-39, 10-50 Follansbee, WV (ORP) 18-24 Folly Beach, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-57 1-22 Folly River, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-10, 7-14 Folsom Lake, American River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Forest Heights, MD (NAB) 4-31, 4-44 Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Forsyth, MT (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL (LSM) 14-16 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL (LSM) 14-18 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-25 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-20, 29-24, 29-26 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-49 Fort Leavenworth Bridge Removal (MRK) 27-16 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) (MRO) 26-25 Fort Macon Park, NC (SAW) 6-25 Fort Macon State Park, NC Remaining Work (SAW) 6-27 Fort Madison Harbor, IA 25-7 Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-28, 9-37, 9-53 Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 Fort Peck Lake, MT (MRO) 26-7, 26-12, 26-15, 26-19 Fort Pierce Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-47 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-28, 9-37 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-8, 26-12, 26-15, 26-19 Fort Scott Lake Marmaton River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 .Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT) 29-5, 29-16, 29-22 Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-33, 10-43 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX (SWF)30-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 Fortuna Bay, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA (NPS) 38-26 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-30 Foster Lake, OR (NPP) 37-43 Fosters Loop Road, Tuscaloosa County, AL (SAM) 10-49 Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO (SWA) 32-4, 32-13, 32-16 Four River Basins, FL (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-49 Fource Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fourmile Creek, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-15 Fourmile Run, VA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Fourpole Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 Fowl River, AL (SAM) 10-50 Fox Point Barrier, RI (NED) 1-49 Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River, Bridge Site #4, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River Locks and Dams (NCE) 21-90 Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River, WI (NCE) 21-10, 21-52, 21-73 Foxholm, ND (NCS) 24-30 Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-20, 3-25 Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS (MRK) 27-17 Frankfort Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-11, 21-52, 21-73 Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-30 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-22, 16-25, 16-30 Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NED) 1-20, 1-34, 1-59 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT (MRO) 26-17 Frazeysburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 Frazier Creek, Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-24 Freeport and Vicinity, Hurricane Flood Protection, TX (SWG) 31-38 Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-19, 31-26, 31-39, 31-40, 31-45 Freeport, IL (NCR) 23-13 Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Fremont, OH, Sandusky River (NCB) 20-43 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN (ORN) 15-13 French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Frenchboro Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Freshwater Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-13 Friday Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-20 Friendly, WV (ORH) 17-22 Friendsville, MD (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 1-23 From North Little Rock to Gillett (Above Plum Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-22 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-22, 29-29 Ft. Clinch State Park, Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Ft. Collins, CO (MRO) 26-23 Fullerton, KY (ORH) 17-22 Fulton County, GA (SAM) 10-54 Fulton, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX (SWF) 30-23 G Galax, VA (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Galena, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Galisteo Dam, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-14, 32-18 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT (MRO) 26-25 Gallipolis, OH (ORH) 17-22 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG) 31-4, 31-19, 31-27, 31-39, 31-41, 31-45 Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Road, NY (NCB) 20-45 Gapway Swamp, NC and SC (SAW) 6-26 Gapway Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Gardner, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Gardners Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Garland City, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (MRO) 26-8, 26-12, 26-15, 26-19 Garvin Brook, Stockton, MN (NCS) 24-30 Gasconade River, MO (MRK) 27-16 Gastineau Channel, AK (NPA) 40-15 Gate Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-40 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-9, 5-13 Gauley River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD (MRO) 26-8, 26-12, 26-16, 26-19 Gaysville Lake, VT (NED) 1-52 Genegantslet Lake, NY (NAB) 4-42 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-20, 3-25 General Investigations Kansas City District (MRK) 27-9 Genesee River, Back River Road, Amity, NY (NCB) 20-45 Genesee River, Caneadea, NY (NCB) 20-45 Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH (NCB) 20-41 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, NC (SAW) 6-26 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-5, 10-45 Georges River, ME (NED) 1-44 Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-10, 7-14 Gering Valley, Gering Drain and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-22 Gering Valley, NE (MRO) 26-17, 26-21 Gibson Creek, TN (ORN) 15-18 Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-31 Gila and San Pedro River, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Gila River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE (MRO) 26-18 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Gillham Lake, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-29 Gills Creek Above Lake Catherine, Richland County, SC, 7-21 Gills Creek Below Lake Catherine, Richland County, SC, 7-21 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (NCS) 24-30 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (ORP) 18-22 Glade Creek, Roanoke County and Vinton, VA (SAW) 6-30 Glasgow, MT (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Gleason Creek, NV (SPK) 35-41 Glen Cove Creek, NY (NAN) 2-29 Glen Cove Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-34 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (NED) 1-44 Goat Island, GA & SC (SAS) 8-23 Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Gold Creek, AK (NPA) 40-16 Goldsboro, Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Goleta, CA and Vicinity (SPL) 33-31 Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Gooding Area, ID(NPW) 39-16 Goodsby Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Goose Creek, Boulder, CO (MRO) 26-23 Goose Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Gordon's Landing, VT (NAN) 2-29 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-47, 10-49 Goshen Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-28 1-24 Governors Run, MD (NAB) 4-42 Gowanas Creek Channel, NY (NAN) 2-29 Grafton, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-29 Grafton Pumping Station, ND (NCS) 24-24 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL (LSM) 14-18 Grahn, KY (ORH) 17-24 Grand Bayou Pass, LA (LMN) 11-13 Grand Forks (NCS) 24-32 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI (NCE) 21-12, 21-52, 21-74 Grand Haven Harbor, MI (1945 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (LMN) 11-4, 11-8, 11-11 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees (SWT) 29-26 Grand Marais Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-74 Grand Marais Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-13, 21-53, 21-74 Grand Marais, MI (NCE) 21-85 Grand Mound-State Historic Site, MN (NCS) 24-6, 24-18, 24-29, 24-30 Grand Neosho River Basin, KS and OK (SWT) 29-28 Grand Prairie (Landfill), TX (SWF) 30-22 Grand Prairie (Meyers Road), TX (SWF) 30-22 Grand River at Grandville, MI (1965 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Grand Ronde Valley, OR (NPW) 39-17 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Grande Ronde Lake, OR (NPW) 39-17 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Grandview, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Granville, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Grapevine Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Grasse River (Massena), NY (NCB) 20-41 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IL (Muscatatuck River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Graves Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Gravesend Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28 Grays Creek Canal, Shelby County, TN (LMM) 13-6 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River (Uncompleted portion), WA (1968 R&H ACT) (NPS) 38-29 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-20 Grays Reef Passage, MI (NCE) 21-85 Grays River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Grayson Lake, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 11-18 Grayville, IL (ORL) 16-25 Great Bend, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-22, 29-29 Great Chazy River, NY (NAN) 2-29 Great Coharie Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-14, 3-20, 3-25 Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-17 Great Kills Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) (NCE) 21-87 Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY (NAN) 2-29 Great Miami River, Brookville Lake, IN (ORL) 16-33 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH (ORL) 16-36, 16-38 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH (ORL) 16-36 Great Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-44 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Great Sodus Bay, NY (NCB) 20-41 Great South Bay, NY (NAN) 2-18, 2-22 Green and Barren Rivers, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-15, 16-20 Green Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-53, 21-74 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Green Bayou Bridges (SWG) 31-5, 31-19, 31-28 Green Brook (Regional Center), NJ (NAN) 2-36 Green Harbor, MA (NED) 1-5, 1,29, 1-39, 1-61 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA (NCR) 23-13 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-18, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA (NPS) 38-26 Green River, Calhoun, KY (ORL) 16-36, 16-38 Green River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-8, 16-17, 16-33 Green River, State Highway 181, WA (NPS) 38-26 Green Swamp, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA (SPK) 35-39 Greene County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Greene, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-31 1-25 Greenport Harbor (NAN) 2-29 Greens Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Greens Creek, Petal, MS (SAM) 10-49 Greentree Subdivision, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Greenup, KY (ORH) 17-22 Greenvale Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-22 Greenwich Bay, RI (NED) 1-44 Greenwich Cove, Greenwich, CT (NED) 1-54 Greenwich Harbor, CT (NED) 1-44 Greenwich Point Beach, CT (NED) 1-52 Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17, 28-30 Gregory Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Greilickville Harbor (Formerly Traverse City Harbor,) MI (NCE).21-85 Greybull, WY (MRO) 26-15, 26-20 Griffithville-Yawkey, WV (ORH) 17-24 Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX (SWG) 31-38 Guadalupe River, CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-29 Guayanes Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-51 Guilford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-5, 1,29, 1-39 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT (NED) 1-48 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-48 Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa County, FL (SAM) 10-47 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay,- FL & Mexican Border (SAM) 10-12, 10-31, 10-39 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border (LMN) 11-13 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border TX (SWG) 31-5, 31-19, 31-28, 31-39, 31-43, 31-44, 31-45,. 31-46 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Gulf Street, Milford, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-57 , Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-12, 10-32, 10-40 Guttenberg, IA (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Guyandotte River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 I-I Haaula Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO (MRK) 27-18 Haikey Creek, OK (SWT) 29-27 Haines Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Halfway Branch, Spartenburg, SC (SAN) 7-21 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-58 flalls Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-29 Halstead, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-22 Hamlet City Lake, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-20 Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Hamlin Beach State Park, NY (NCB) 20-42 Hammersley Inlet (Uncompleted Portion), WA (NPS) 38-29 Hammersley Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-25 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT (NED) 1-48 Hammond Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-14, 21-53, 21-74 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-36 Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH (NED) 1-48 Hampton Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Hampton Harbor, NH (NED) 1-44, 1-61 Hampton Institute, VA (NAO) 5-16 Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) (NAO) 5-3, 5-8, 5-11 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 Hanahan Water Treatment Plan, Charleston County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hanapepe River, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-18, 1-33, 1-58 Hancock County, Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-49 Hanging Rock, OH (ORH) 17-22 Hannibal Harbor, MO 25-8 Hannibal, MO (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Hannibal SBH, MO (NCR) 23-11 Hanover, Hennepin County, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Hansen Dam, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-17, 33-31 Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-14, 21-54, 21-74 Harbor of Refuge (NAP) 3-27 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 1-26 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-6, 1-29, 1-39 Harbor of Refuge, NC (SAW) 6-27 Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) (NCE) 21-87 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13, 27-20 Harlem River, NY (NAN) 2-29 Harpers Ferry, WV (NAB) 4-42 Harraseeket River, ME (NED) 1-44 Harris Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-17 Harrisburg, IL (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Harrison County, MS Shore Protection (SAM) 10-46 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Harrisville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-54, 21-75 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) (ORL) 16-35 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) (MRK) 27-17, 27-12 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO (MRK) 27-9, 27-12, 27-16 Hartford, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Hartford, White River, VT (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Hartford, WV (ORH) 17-22 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12 Hartwell Lake, GA and SC (SAS) 8-10, 8-14, 8-20, 8- 23 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA (LMN) 11-15 Hastings Harbor, MN 25-7 Hatchie River, Alcorn County, MS (LMM) 13-6 Haverhill, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-59 Havre, MT (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam (MRO) 26-19 Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY (NED) 1-44 Hay Creek, Belle Fource, SD (MRO) 26-25 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA (NAP) 3-29 Hayden Island, OR (NPP) 37-38 Hays, Big Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Haysi, VA (ORH) 17-21 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA (NED) 1-49 Hazard, KY (ORL) 16-21 16-25 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-16 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Helena Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-5 Hellens Creek, MD (NAB) 4-43 Helm Lake, IL (ORL) 16-28, 16-34 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Hempstead Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-18, 2-22, 2-34 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA (NPS) 38-26 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL (NCR) 23-12 Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henderson Creek, Warren County, IL (NCR) 23-16 Henderson Harbor Cut, NY (NCB) 20-44 Henderson River, IL (NCR) 23-13 Henderson, WV (ORH) 17-22 Hendrick's Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44 Hennepin County, County Highway 116, MN (NCS) 24-30 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henrys Fork Unit (NPW) 39-17 Hereford Inlet (NAP) 3-30 Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-14 Herkimer, NY (NAN) 2-32 Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River (NAN) 2-16 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD (MRO) 26-17, 26-20 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-25,4-34 Herring Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Hesperia, CA (SPL) 33-31 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-22 Hickman Run, Little Tyrone Township, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Hickman Wash, Ft. Defiance, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-29 Higginsport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Highland Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Highway 12, CO (SWA) 32-19 Highway 187, El Terraplen, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Highway 23/14, Jackson County, MN (NCC) 23-16 Highway 23/8, Jackson County, MN (NCC) 23-16 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, FL (SAM) 10-47 1-27 Hills Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-18-, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Hills Point Road, Dorchester County, MD (NAB) 4-41 Hillsborough Bay, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Hillsborough River, FL (SAJ) 9-44 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-14, 27-20 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Hilslboro Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Hingham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-45 Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN (ORN) 15-14 Hmapton Roads and Elizabeth River (NAO) 5-12 Hockingport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-34 Hodges Village Dam, MA (NED) 1-23, 1-35, 1-60 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA (NPS) 38-26 Hoh River, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-29 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook, AZ (SPL) 33-11, 33-17 Holbrook Levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) (ORL) 16-25 Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (1954 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Holland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-54, 21-75 Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek (NAN) 2-16 Holley Lake, OR (NPP) 37-40 Holly, CO (SWA) 32-19 Hollywood-A2dmore Beach, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME (NED) 1-49 Holmes Creek, FL (SAM) 10-46 Holston River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Holyoke, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Homasassa River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Homer Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Homer Spit Erosion, AK (NPA) 40-57 40-10, 40-13 Hominy Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-27, 6-30 Homme Lake and Dam, ND (NCS) 24-6, 24-19, 24-31 lHomochitto River, MS (LMK) 12-16, 12-21 Honey Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Honey Hill Lake, NH (NED) 1-52 Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-25, 4-34 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 lHood Canal, Hoodsport, WA (NPS) 38-27 lHoonah Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Hlooper, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-21 Hooper, NE (MRO) 26-17 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Hop Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-18, 1-33, 1-58 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NED) 1-20, 1-34, 1-59 Hoquiam, Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-29 Hoquiam River, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Horn Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-15 Hornell, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-29 Horseshoe Bend, WA (NPS) 38-31 Horseshoe Cove, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Hoskins Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel, SD (MRO) 26-20 Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS (SAM) 10-47 Houma Navigation Canal, LA (LMN) 11-13 Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA (NED) 1-18, 1-58 Housatonic River, CT (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-49 Hlousatonic River, Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-49 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-49 Houston County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Houston, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24-19 Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-20, 31-30, 31-39, 31-41, 31-46 Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Howards Mill Lake, NC (SAW) 6-26 Hudson Harbor, WI (NCS) 24-26 1-28 Hudson River Channel, NY & N.J. (NAN) 2-6, 2-18, 2-23, 2-28 Hudson River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Hudson River, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-18, 2-23, 2-27 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (NAN) 2-34 Hugo Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-23 Hulah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-23 Hull Branch, MS (SAM) 10-54 Humarock Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-54 Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA (SPN) 34-13 Humboldt Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-9, 40-12 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV (SPK) 35-41 Humboldt, TN (LMM) 13-6 Humbug Creek, Pilger, NE (MRO) 26-24 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Hunting Island Beach, SC (SAN) 7-17 Huntingdon, TN (LMM) 13-7 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA (NPP) 37-37 Huntington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Huntington Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-17 Huntington, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Huntington, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Huot, MN (NCS) 24-29 Huron Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-33 Hurricane Barrier Operations New England Division (NED) 1-26 Hurricane Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Hutchins, KY (ORH) 17-24 Hutchinson LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Hutto Creek, Austin, IN (ORL) 16-38 Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX (SWF) 30-23 Hyannis Harbor, MA (NED) 1-45, 1-54, 1-61 Hydaburg, AK (NPA) 40-17 Hyde County Dike, NC (SAW) 6-27 I 1-38 Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 lao Stream, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA (NAP) 3-28 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE (NAP) 3-28 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-19, 39-23 Ice House Canyon, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Ida Grove, IA (MRO) 26-17 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek, IA (MRO) 26-22 Iliuliuk Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, (NCR) IL 23-2, 23-7 Illinois Beach State Park, IL (NCC) 22-7, 22-14, 22-19 Illinois River, Liverpool, IL (NCR) 23-15 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL (NCC) 22-22 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL (NCC) 22-23 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-23 Illinois Waterway Existing Locks and Dams (NCR) 23-17 Illinois Waterway, IL (LSM) 14-2 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Additional Features (NCR) 23-18, 23-19 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-2, 23-7, 23-8, 23-19, 23-20 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Lock and Dam Construction (NCR) 23-17, 23-18 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks (NCR) 23-13 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-19, 23-20 Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL (NCR) 23-14 Illinois Waterway, Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) (NCR) 23-13 Imperial Beach, CA (SPL) 33-30 Inarajan Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 Indian Bend Wash (SPL) 33-31 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-18 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA (MRO) 26-17, 26-23 Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan County, IN (ORL) 16-36, 16-38 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Indian Creek, Fort Worth, TX (SWF) 30-23 Indian Creek, Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-25 Indian Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-18 Indian Grave Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-18 Indian River County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-47 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP) 3-5, 3-18 3-22 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN (NCC) 22-7, 22-14, 22-19 Indiana Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-4, 22-13, 22-18, 22-21 1-29 Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (NCC) 22-7, 22-14, 22-20 Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section)(White River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section)(White River) (ORL) 16-25 Indianola, NE (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Industry, PA (ORP) 18-24 Inex, KY (ORH) 17-24 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware SBay (NAP) 3-27 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, MD, (NAP) 3-5, 3-18, 3-22 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE , (NAP) 3-6, 3-18, 3-23 Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works (NPW) 39-2 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects New England Division (NED) 1-10 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Detroit District (NCE) 21-42 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 Galveston District (SWG) 31-17 Huntington District (ORH) 17-10 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-8, 27-12 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-7 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-9 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-24 Nashville District (ORN) 15-5 New England Division (NED) 1-25 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-7 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Omaha District (MRO) 26-7 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-11 Portland District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-8 Seattle District (NPS) 38-9 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-14 Inspection of Non-Federal Levees Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-22 International Boundary Waters Board 49-1 Interstate 59 Bridges, Foster, AL (SAM) 10-47 Interstate Bridge, Colubmia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) (NPP) 37-36 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR (NPP) 37-36 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-28, 9-37 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-13 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-28, 9-37 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act 49-1 lola LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Iowa River, Chelsea, IA (NCR) 23-16 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Ipswich River, MA (NED) 1-45 Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Irondale Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 Irondequoit Bay, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-33 Ironton, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Irving Township at Nichols Road, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-24 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-24 Irvington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-34 Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-29 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA (NED) 1-49 Island Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD (NAB) 4-39 Island End River, Chelsea, MA (NED) 1-45 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-31 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-45 1-30 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH (NED) 1-45 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD (NAB) 4-41 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME (NED) 1-49 Isreal River, Lancaster, NH (NED) 1-57 Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY (NCB) 20-43 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-9, 8-14, 8-20, 8-23 Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Jackson Brand, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Jackson County Levee District No. 2, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Jackson Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Jackson Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY (NPW) 39-16 Jackson Hole, WY (NPW) 39-2, 39-10 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-31, 10-38 Jackson Township, Butler County, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-29, 9-38 Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-29, 9-38 Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 James Hose Ditch, Linden, IN (ORL) 16-38 James R. Olin Flood Control Project (NAO) 5-6, 5-9, 5-13 James River Environmental, SD (MRO) 26-24 James River, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-8, 5-11 James River White Shoal Lt. to Rocklanding Shoal Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (SWL) 28-3 Jamestown Reservoir, ND (MRO) 26-17 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI (NCR) 23-13 Jarvis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Jasper County, IL (ORL) 16-38 Jefferson County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo, MT (MRO) 26-20 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks, MT (MRO) 26-20 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Jeffries Creek, Darlington County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-14, 32-18 Jenks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-48 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB) 4-3, 4-28, 4-37 Jeremy Creek, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-15 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA (SAM) 10-26, 10-34, 10-45 Joe Creek LPP, OK (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3), AR (SWL) 28-4 Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA (NPP) 37-18, 37-27, 37-34, 37-44 John Day River (West), OR (NPP) 37-38 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 John Day River, OR (NPP) 37-40 John Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-16, 6-20 John Marvin Reservoir, CO (SWA) 32-4, 32-13 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-23 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 John's Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-29, 9-38 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME (NED) 1-49 Johnson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Johnson Creek, OR (NPP) 37-38 Johnsonburg, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Johnstown, PA (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 Jones Inlet (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Jonesport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-45 Jonesville, LA (LMK) 12-15 Josias River, ME (NED) 1-6, 1-29, 1-39 Joyce Creek, Camden County, NC (SAW) 6-26 Juan Mendez Channel, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Julian, Rock Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Juneau Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 1-31 K Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kahoma Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7. Kahului Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Kake Harbor, AK. (NPA) 40-15 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-40 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-36 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), MI (NCE) 21-86 Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (1954 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-7 Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17. Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kankakee River Ice Management, IL (NCC) 22-8, 22-15 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee Between Shelby, Bridge and Baum's Bridge, IN (NCC) 22-23 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod.) (MRK) 27-17 Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS (MRK) 27-17 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 27-20 Kansas River Navigation (MRK) 27-18 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Kasilof Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12, 14-16 . Kaskaskia River, IL (LSM) 14-11, 14-16 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI (POD) 36-11 Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 . . Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaw Dam to Keystone Lake (SWT) 29-28 Kaw Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-23 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-1, 36-5, 36-6 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-12 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-29 Kawishiwi River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Kawkawlin River, MI (NCE) 21-86 Kays Creek, UT (SPK) 35-39 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Keene, NH (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Keg Creek, Minden, IA (MRO) 26-23 Kehoe Lake, KY (ORH) 17-21 Keithsburg Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-14 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-8 Kelleys Island, OH (NCB) 20-41 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-21 Kennebec River, ME (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Kennebunk River, ME (NED) 1-45 Kenosha Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Kenosha Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-16, 21-55, 21-75 Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY (ORL) 16-38 Kentucky River, KY (ORL) 16-2 Kentucky River, National Recreation Area (ORL) 16-25 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA (SPK) 35-39 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Ketchikan, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Ketchikan Harbor (West Breakwater), AK (NPA) 40-16 Keuka Lake, NY (NCB) 20-23, 20-39 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Kewaunee, WI (NCE) 21-17, 21-55, 21-75 Keweenaw Waterway, MI (NCE) 21-17, 21-56, 21-76 Key West Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Keyport Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 1-32 Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-21 Keystone Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Keystone Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-24, 29-26 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Kihei Beach, Maui, HI (POD) 36-8 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-19, 2-24 Kindred Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 King County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-27 King Cove Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-17 Kings Creek, MS (SAM) 10-49 Kings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA (NED) 1-45 Kingston Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25 Kingston, NY (NAN) 2-16 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Kinzua Damrn and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY, (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Kiowa Tribe Housing Development, Andarko, OK (SWT) 29-28 Kirbyville, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21 Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-12 Kishwaukee River, Belvidere, IL (NCC) 23-16 Kissemmee River Restoration, FL (SAJ) 9-25, 9-34, 9-50, 9-51 Kittanning, PA Part I (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Kittanning, PA Part II (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Kitzmiller, MD (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Klamath River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Klamath River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Klawock, AK (NPA) 40-17 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK (NPA) 40-16 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Knapps Narrows, MD (NAB) 4-6, 4-25, 4-34 Knife River Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-85 Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA (SPN) 34-13 Knightville Dam, MA (NED) 1-15, 1-32, 1-56 Knobb's Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24 Kodiak Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-63 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID (NPS) 38-27 Kootenai River, ID and MT (NPS) 38-25 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID (NPS) 38-27 Koyuk, AK (NPA) 40-17 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 L La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-27 La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-26, 24-32 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvemnet, WI (NCS) 24-7, 24-20 La Trappe, MD (NAB) 4-39 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24-20 Lac qui Parle, MN (NCS) 24-30 Lacakawanna, NY, Smokes Creek (NCB) 20-43 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB) 4-13, 4-37 Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Lafayette River, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-8, 5-12 Lago de Cerillos, PR (SAJ) 9-49 Lago de Portuges, PR (SAJ) 9-49 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-45, 1-61 LaGrange Bayou, FL (SAM) 10-46, 10-50 LaGrange Gut, Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-10 Lake Andursia, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-8, 24-20 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-16 Lake Brownwood Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 Lake Camanchie, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA (LMN) 11-13 Lake Charles, LA (LMN) 11-10 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY (ORP) 18-24 Lake City Harbor, MN 25-7 Lake City, IN (ORN) 15-18 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX (SWF) 30-23 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Lake Crockett, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-21, 38-30 1-33 Lake Darling Dam, ND (NCS) 24-24 Lake Douglas, Decatur, GA (SAM) 10-57 Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-17 Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH (NCB) 20-44 Lake Erie, Eastlake, OH (NCB) 20-45 Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-45 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act (ORP) 18-24 Lake Erie, SR 531, Ashtabula, OH (NCB) 20-45 Lake Erie Sturgeon Point, NY (NCB) 20-21 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX (SWF) 30-22 Lake George, Hobart, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-15, 22-20 Lake Guntersville, AL (ORN) 15-18 Lake Herman (Dredging), SD (MRO) 26-18 Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) (SWT) 29-26 Lake Kemp, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-23 Lake Michigan Diversion (NCC) 22-5, 22-14, 22-18 Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-22 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL (NCC) 22-22 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL (NCC) 22-22 Lake Montauk Harbor (NAN) 2-29 Lake Ogleton, MD (NAB) 4-43 Lake Ontario, Shoals Point, Wayne County, NY (NCB) 20-45 Lake Oroville, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-4, 11-8, 11-11 Lake Pontchartrain, North Shore, LA (LMN) 11-11 Lake Providence Harbor, LA (LMK) 12-16 Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (NCS) 24-24, . 24-30 Lake River Delta Area, WA (NPP) 37-40 Lake River, WA (NPP) 37-36, 37-42 Lake Sawyer, Camp Miakonda, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-45 Lake Shelbyville, IL (LSM) 14-16 Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-45 Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in (NCE) 21-18, 21-56, 21-76 Lake Texoma (Denison Dam) OK and TX (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-23, 29-28 Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN (NCS) 24-8, 24-20 Lake Traverse, MN and SD (NCS) 24-23 Lake Washington Ship Channel, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21, 38-30 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-23 Lakeport Lake, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (NCB) 20-22, 20-39 Lakeside, San Diego, CA (SPL) 33-31 Lakeside,OR (NPP) 37-42 Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-41 Lamoille River, VT (NAN) 2-34 Lamoille River, VT: Hardwich Dams (NAN) 2-32 Lamprey River, NH (NED) 1-45 Lancassange Creek, Clark County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-43 Lancaster, Israel River, NH (NED) 1-49 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Lansing (Grand River), MI (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Lansing Harbor, IA 25-7 LaPoint Harbor, W1 (NCE) 21-18, 21-56, 21-76 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID (NPW) 39-16 Larchmont Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Largo Sound Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Lamrned LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-5, 11-18 11-11 Larsen Bay, AK (NPA) 40-17 Las Animas, CO (SWA) 32-19 Las Cruces, NM (SWA) 32-19 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-30 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-34 LaSueur, MN (NCS) 24-29 Latrobe, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Latta Brook Road, NY (NAB) 4-41 Lauderdale County, MS (SAM) 10-54 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Launiupoko, Maui, HI (POD) 36-11 Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-17 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID (NPW) 39-16 Lavaca-Navidad River, TX (SWG) 31-38 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-19 Lavon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-19 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Lawrenceburg, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-30 1-34 Lead Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-13, 12-21 Leading Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-47 Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS (SAM) 10-47 Leaf River, MS (SAM) 10-54 Leavenworth, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Lee County, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Lee, Housatonic River, MA (NED) 1-49 Leehigh River at Bethlehem, PA (NAP) 3-30 Leesville, VA (SAW) 6-26 Leetonia, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Leetsdale, PA (ORP) 18-24 Leipsic River, DE (NAP) 3-28 Leith's Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, NC (SAW) 6-26 Leland Bowman Lock, LA (LMN) 11-13 Leland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-56, 21-76 Lemon Creek, NY (NAN) 2-34 Lepua Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI (NCE) 21-85 Letart Falls, OH (ORH) 17-22 Letart, WV (ORH) 17-22 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-28 Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 (LSM) 14-18 Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 (LSM) 14-18 Levee Districts Between Cowdon and Vandalia, IL (LSM) 14-18 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-27 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 10, White River, IN (ORL) 16-27 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-27 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-27 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Levee Unit 9, White River, IN (ORL) 16-27 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN (ORL) 16-15, 16-24, 16-35 Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18, 17-20 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Lewis River Area, WA (NPP) 37-40 Lewis River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-27 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lexington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-57, 21-76 Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 Liberal, KS (SWT) 29-27 Liberty Island Anchorage (NAN) 2-28 Liberty Local Protection Project, TX (SWG) 31-38 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County) (ORL) 16-36 Lick Run, Roanoke, VA (SAW) 6-26 Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-25, 16-33, 16-36 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT (NED) 1-48 Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY (NCB) 20-44 Lincoln Lake, IL (ORL) 16-28 Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Lincoln, Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-21 Linderberg Bay Area, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Linton, ND (MRO) 26-17 Linville River, Avery County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Linwood Park, Vermillion, OH (NCB) 20-45 Lisle, NY (NAB) 4-18, 4-29 Litt Creek Channel (NAO) 5-17 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Little Bay, TX (SWG) 31-38 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-17 1-35 Little Blue River Lakes, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14 Little Blue River, Shelby County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Little Browns Creek, AL (SAM) 10-48 Little Caillou Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-13 Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (NCC) 22-9, 22-15, 22-20 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN (NCC) 22-23 Little Calumet River, IN (NCC) 22-9, 22-15, 22-20, 22-22 Little Chena River Dam, AK (NPA) 40-16 Little Colorado River at Holbrook Levee, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Little Conemaugh River, Wilmore, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL (SAM) 10-47 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Little Cross Creek, Fayetteville, NC (SAW) 6-30 Little Dell Lake, UT, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-30 Little Diomede, AK (NPA) 40-17 Little Egg Harbor, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Little Falls, MN (NCS) 24-32 Little Fork River, Hwy 75, MN (NCS) 24-30 Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan, WA (NPW) 39-56 39-10, 39-14, 39-20, 39-23 Little Harbor, NH (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN (ORN) 15-18 Little Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Little Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-57, 21-76 Little Limestone Creek, TN (ORN) 15-18 Little Machipongo River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Little Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH (ORL) 16-36 Little Miami River, Milford, OH (ORL) 16-36 Little Miami River, OH (ORL) 16-33 Little Miami River, South Lebanon, OH (ORL) 16-38 Little Missouri River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR (LMK) 12-18 Little Neck Bay, NY (NAN) 2-29 Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE (MRO) 26-18 Little Nemaha River, Tangeman, NE (MRO) 26-21 Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-17 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Little Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-19 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-19 Little Red River, District 1, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little River (Creek), VA (NAO) 5-15 Little River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Little River at Cayuga Island, NY (NCB) 20-41 Little River Basin, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-29 Little River, Belfast, ME (NED) 1-49 Little River, Cameron, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-15 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, NC (SAW) 6-26 Little Scooba Creek, MS (SAM) 10-54 Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA (MRO) 26-23 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-33 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, NC (SAW) 6-26 Little Tallahatchie River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Little Tennessee River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT (SPK) 35-41 Little Wabash River, Carmi, IL (ORL) 16-38 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Little Wicomoco River (NAB) 4-6, 4-25, 4-34 Little Wills Creek, AL (SAM) 10-49 Little Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 Little Yankee Creek, Hubbard, OH (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Littleville Lake, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-32, 1-56 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Lock and Dam No. 5, AR (SWL) 28-4 Lock Haven, PA (NAB) 4-14, 4-28, 4-37 Lock No. 2 and Wilber D. Mills Dam (No. 2), AR (SWL) 28-3 Locklies Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Lodgepole Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-24 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft, NE (MRO) 26-21 Logan Creek, Pender, NE (MRO) 26-24 1-36 Logan, OH (ORH) 17-23 Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Long Beach Island (NAP) 3-29, 3-30 Long Branch, Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-1 1, 27-14 Long Island Intracoastal W/W, NY (NAN) 2-7, 2-19, 2-24 Long LakeArea, Helena, AR (LMM) 13-7 Long Lake Dam, AK (NPA) 40-16 Long Road F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-31 Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-29, 9-38 Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-19, 37-27, 37-34, 37-43 Lorain Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-33 Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act modified by 1930 R&HI Act (NCB) 20-46 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-19 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-16, 33-25 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-123, 26-24 Lost Creek, Carbon Hill, AL (SAM) 10-49 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River, OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-27, 37-35, 37-43 Lost River, MN (NCS) 24-24 Lost River, Orleans & Orange Counties, IN (ORL) 16-38 Louisville, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-25, 16-30, 16-35 Louisville, KY (Partial) (ORL) 16-27 Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-34 Loup River, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-17 Loves Park, IL (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Lowell Creek, AK (NPA) 40-16 Lowell, MA (NED) 1-49, 1-59 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD (MRO) 26-17 Lower Branch Rush River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Lower Butte Basin, CA (SPK) 35-43 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA (NPP) 37-13, 37-25, 37-33 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Lower Creek, Lenoir, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-20 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA (NPW) 39-16 Lower Fox River, WI (1925 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-85 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) (SPL) 33-31 Lower Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-14, 39-20, 39-23 Lower Grays River (NPP) 37-42 Lower Green River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-22 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND (MRO) 26-17 Lower Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-17 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-39 Lower Mauvais Coulee/Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-31 Lower Mission Creek, CA (SPL) 33-12, 33-17 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West, WA (NPW) 39-7, 39-11, 39-14, 39-21, 39-23 Lower Northlanding River Channel (NAO) 5-17 Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-36 Lower San Francisco Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA (SPK) 35-39 Lower San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-30 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA (SPK) 35-31 Lower Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-17, 33-31 Lower Savannah River (SAS) 8-9 Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR and ID (NPW) 39-7, 39-11, 39-14 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD (NAB) 4-39 Lower Walla Walla River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Lower Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-49, 1-56 Lowes Wharf, MD (NAB) 4-39 Lowndes County, MS (SAM) 10-54 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Lubec Channel, ME (NED) 1-45 Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID (NPW) 39-17 Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NPW) 39-3, 39-10, 39-13 Ludington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-57, 21-77 Ludlow, KY (ORL) 16-27 1-37 Ludlow Lake, VT (NED) 1-52 Lukfata Lake, OK (SWT) 29-25, 29-28 Lumber River, SC (SAN) 7-19 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-36 Lutsen Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-85 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Lyman Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Lynn Harbor, MA (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA (NED) 1-48 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-15 Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, TN (ORN) 15-18 M Maalaea Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 Machias River, Machias, ME (NED) 1-49 Machias River,,Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-19, 1-34, 1-42 Machias River, ME (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Mackay Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-27 Mackinac City Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85- Mackinac Island Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Macy, Blackbird Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Mad River at Blue Lake, CA (SPN) 34-14 Mad River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-41 Mad River Lake, CT (NED) 1-49, 1-56 Mad River, Waterbury, CT (NED) 1-55 Mad River, Wolcott, CT (NED) 1-55 Madison Bay, MD (NAB) 4-39 Madison, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks (MRO) 26-17, 26-21 Madison River, Quake Lake, MT (MRO) 26-20 Madisons Parish Port, LA (LMK) 12-16 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-47, 10-49 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-45 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Magruder Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Mahnomen, MN (NCS) 24-29 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Mahoning River, Warren County, OH (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-31 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR (SWL) 28-4 Malden River, MA (NED) 1-45 Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR (NPW) 39-16 Malheur Lake Project, OR (NPW) 39-16 Malheur River, OR (NPW) 39-17 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit (NPW) 39-18 Maline Creek, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-12 Mamaroneck Harbor (NAN) 2-29 Manasquan River, NJ (NAP) 3-7, 3-18, 3-23 Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-32, 9-47 Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-29, 9-38 Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Manchester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52 Manchester, OH (ORH) 17-22 Mandan, Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-17, 26-20 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, HI (POD) 36-7 Manhasset Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Maniece Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Manistee Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-56, 21-77 Manistique Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-21, 21-58, 21-77 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-21, 21-58, 21-77 Mankato and North Mankato, MN (NCS) 24-8, 24-20 Mankato, North Mankato, and Lettillier, MN (NCS) 24-29 Mankato Township, MN (NCS) 24-30 Mann's Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-27 Manokin River, MD (NAB) 4-39 Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NED) 1-24, 1-35, 1-59 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-19 Mantua Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Manvel, ND (NCS) 24-30 Maple Creek, East Fork, Howells, NE (MRO) 26-24 Maple Creek, Nickerson, NE (MRO) 26-24 Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-29 Mapleshade, OH (ORH) 17-22 Maquoketa River County Road 47 Bridge, IA (NCR) 23-16 Marblehead Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52, 1-54 Marengo County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Marengo, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marginal Way. Ogunquit. ME (NED) 1-49 Marietta, OH (ORH) 17-22 1-38 Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-14, 33-22, 33-30 Marion County Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marion, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-27, 16-34 Marion, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-23 Mariposa, CA (SPK) 35-43 Markham Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Marmarth, ND (MRO) 26-17, 26-20 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-20 Marquette Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-22, 21-59, 21-78 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY (NCB) 20-43 Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-8, 24-20, 24-32 Marshalltown, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Martin County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Martin, KY (ORH) 17-21 Martins Creek, Unicoi County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Martins Ferry, OH (ORP) 18-24 Martins Fork Lake, KY (ORN) 15-4, 15-9, 15-17 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-30 Mary's Creek, Fort Worth and Benbrook, TX (SWF) 30-23 Marysville, KS (MRK) 27-18 Marysville Lake, CA (SPK) 35-39 Masefau Bay, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Mason J. Niblack Levee, (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Mason River, Goose Creek, Grundy County, IL (NCC) 23-16 Mason, WV (ORH) 17-22 Massillon, OH, (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-20, 31-31, 31-41, 31-46 Matawan Creek (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Matinicus Harbor, ME (NED) 1-45 Mats Mats Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Mattapoiset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-52 Mattaponi River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Mattituck Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Mauckport, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Maumee Bay State Park, OH (NCB) 20-11, 20-21, 20-38 Mautmee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act (NCB) 20-46 Maumee River, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-45 Maumee River, Wallbridge Park, OH (NCB) 20-44 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Maurice River, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth 3-28 Maurice River, NJ, Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project (NAP) 3-30 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-16 Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-9, 9-29, 9-39 Maynor Creek State park, Wayne, MS (SAM) 10-49 Maysville, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK (SWT) 29-2 29-14, 29-22 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Recertification, AR (SWL) 28-3, 28-14, (SWT) 29-26 McCook and Thorton Reservoirs, IL (NCC) 22-10, 22-15, 22-20 McCook Lake, SD (MRO) 26-17 McCready's Point Road, MD (NAB) 4-14, 4-28, 4-37 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-38 McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-16 McGinnis Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 29-25, 29-29 McGregor Park, Montgomery County, TN (ORN) 15-18 McKees Rocks, PA (ORP) 18-24 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR (NPP) 37-38 McKinney Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR (LMK) 12-23 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 1-39 McNary Lock and Dam -Lake Wallula, OR and WA (NPW) 39-8, 39-11, 39-14, 39-22 McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & WA (NPW) 39-17 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek, NE (MRO) 26-21 Medicine Knoll, Blunt, SD (MRO) 26-24 Medomak River, ME (NED) 1-45 Meherrin River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Mekorykuk, AK (NPA) 40-15 Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-29, 9-39 Melvern Lake and Pamona Lake (Road Improvements), KS (1974 Act) (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-14 27-11, 27-20 Melvin Price Locks & Dam (Formerly Lock and Dam No. 26 (Replacement)) (LSM) 14-11 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Menemsha Creek, MA (NED) 1-45 Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (NCE) 21-23, 21-59, 21-78 Meramec Park Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-9, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-30, 35-43 Merced County Streams, CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-30 Merced River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-16 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA (LMN) 11-13 Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-13 Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME (NED) 1-49 Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NED) 1-18, 1-59 Merrimack River, MA (NED) 1-45 Metamora Lake, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-33 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-29 Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-10, 40-12 Metropolis, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-30, 9-39 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Miami River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Mianus River, CT (NED) 1-45 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP), 18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Michigan City Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-5, 22-14, 22-19, 22-21 Middle Beach, CT (NED) 1-48 Middle Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) (SPL) 33-31 Middle Hooper Island, MD (NAB) 4-14, 4-28, 4-37 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, NE (MRO) 26-21 Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-14, 32-17 Middle River and Connecting Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Middle River at Argyle, MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-20 Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Middleport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Middlesboro (Diversion Canal) KY (ORN) 15-18 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-14, 15-18 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Middleton Shoals, GA & SC (SAS) 8-23 Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Midland Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Midland/Jal Draw, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Milan, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Miles City, MT (MRO) 26-17 Milford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Milk River, Havre, MT (MRO) 26-18 Milk River, Malta, MT (MRO) 26-20, 26-24 1-40 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (NED) 1-49, 1-57 Mill Brook-Highland Park, NJ (NAN) 2-36 Mill Creek, Catawaba River, Old Fort, NC (SAN) 6-30 Mill Creek, City of Moab, UT (SPK) 35-45 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA (SAM) 10-47 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-15 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-36 Mill Creek Lake, WA (NPW) 39-3, 39-10, 39-13 Mill Creek Levees (SPL) 33-32 Mill Creek, Mcgee, MS (SAM) 10-49 Mill Creek, MD (NAB) 4-43 Mill Creek, NC (SAW) 6-30 Mill Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 Mill Creek, OH (ORL) 16-4, 16-15 Mill Creek, Salem, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-25, 37-33, 37-42 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS (SAM) 10-19, 10-33, 10-43 Mill Creek, TX (SWG) 31-38 Mill Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Mill Creek, WA (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Mill Lake, Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-18 Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Millbranch Stream, Fairmont, NC (SAW) 6-30 Miller, OH (ORH) 17-22 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Miller Run, Cecil Township, PA (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-26, 10-35 Millersburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 Millford Haven, VA (NAO) 5-15 Millican, TX (SWF) 30-22 Millington, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Millwood Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-15, 28-29 Millwood, WV (ORH) 17-22 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR (NWP) 39-16 Milton Harbor (NAN) 2-7, 2-19, 2-24 Milton, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Milton, PA (NAB) 4-44 Milwaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-23, 21-59, 21-78 Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-78 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Mines Creek, Spring Valley, WI (NCS) 24-29 Mingo Creek, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-23, 29-27, 29-29 Mingo Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Mingo Junction, OH (ORP) 18-24 Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 Minneota, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (NCS) 24-10, 24-20 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN (NCS) 24-24 Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-20 Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-19, 24-22 Minot, ND (NCS) 24-24 Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization Fort Worth District (SWF) 30-11 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Seattle District (NPS) 38-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Mispillion River, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-18 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI (NED) 1-48, 1-54 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID (NPW) 39-16 Mission Beach, CA (SPL) 33-30 Mission Zanja, CA (SPL) 33-31 Missisquoi River at Richford, VT (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Mississinewa Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-17 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN (NCS) 24-23 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO (LSM) 14-18 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL (underseepage measures) (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor (LSM) 14-18 Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN) 11-10, 11-14 Mississippi River Between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN (NCS) 24-23 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN 25-1, 25-14 1-41 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (Includes Melvin Price Locks & DAM) (LSM) 14-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCS) 24-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCR) 23-3 Mississippi River betwen Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL (LSM) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Mississippi River Commission 41-1 Mississippi River, First Avenue, Hampton IL (NCR) 23-16 Mississippi River, Fridley, MN (NCS) 24-30 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA (LMN) 11-14 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-8, 11-10 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA (LMN) 11-14 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-8, 11-10 Missoula (Sewage Treatment Plant), MT (NPS) 38-27 Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD ' (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-13 Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Missouri River, Aten, NE (MRO) 26-17 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, SD (MRO) 26-20 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, MT (MRO) 26-20 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization and Navigation, NE (MRO) 26-2, 26-10 Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-13 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and ND (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-14 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND (MRO) 26-19 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-14 Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-19 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-18, 27-19, 27-20 Missouri River Levees, IA, NE, KS and MO (MRO) 26-11, 26-14, 26-19, 26-23 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 27-20 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-23 Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update (MRO) 26-9, 26-12, 26-16 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE (MRO) 26-17 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (MRO) 26-2, 26-10, 26-13 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT (MRO) 26-15 Mitigation of Shore Damages Detroit District (NCE) 21-39 Mixon Creek, McGee, MS (SAM) 10-49 Mobile Bay to New Orleans, LA (SAM) 10-39 Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM) 10-13, 10-32, 10-40 Mocassin Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-27 Moccasin Springs, MO (LSM) 14-15 Moclips River, Moclips, WA (NPS) 38-27 Mohave Floodwarning, CA (SPL) 33-31 Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-16, 33-27 Mokelumne River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR (NPP) 37-38 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR (NPP) 37-38 Moline Harbor, IL 25-7 Moline, IL (NCR) 23-13 Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (NAP) 3-8, 3-18, 3-23 Mon River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Pt. Marion, PA (detalied project report) (ORP) 18-30 Mon River, Water St., Pt. Marion, PA (detalied project report) (ORP) 18-30 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, IA (MRO) 26-23 Monongahela River, PA and WV (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17, 18-26, 18-27, 18-28 Monoosnoc Brook, MA (NED) 1-52 Monoosnoc Lake, MA (NED) 1-52 Monroe and West Monroe Parish, LA and Ouachita Parish, LA (LMK) 12-13 1-42 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-7, 4-26, 4-34 Monroe County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Monroe County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 Monroe County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-54 Monroe Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-24, 21-60, 21-79 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Monroe Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-17, 16-33 Montcalm, WV (ORH) 17-24 Monterey Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 Montgomery County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Montour Falls, Oswega River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-43 Moore, OK (SWT) 29-29 Moorefield, WV (NAB) 4-43 Moores Ferry, VA (ORH) 17-23 Moorhead, MN (NCS) 24-26 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR (NPP) 37-36 Moosabec Bar, ME (NED) 1-45 Morais River, ND (NCS) 24-30 Moravian Creek, Wilksboro, NC (SAW) 6-30 Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Morehead City Harbor, NC Jetties at Beaufort Inlet (SAW) 6-27 Morgan City and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-8, 11-12, 11-15 Moriches Bay, NY (NAN) 2-28 Moriches Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-29 Mormon Slough, CA (SPK) 35-39 Morris Cove, New Haven, CT (NED) 1-54 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO (MRO) 26-18 Morristown Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-41 Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-22 Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-28, 16-31 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-8, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Moss Landing Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-14 Moss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Mott, ND (MRO) 26-17 Mound State Park, Moundville, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-33, 10-38 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL (LMM) 13-6 Moundsville, WV (ORP) 18-24 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-86 Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-12, 20-22, 20-39 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA (NPP) 37-38 Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-25 Mountain Brook Dam, NH (NED) 1-52 Mountain Point, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-10, 40-13, 40-17 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Moycock Creek, NC (SAW) 6-27 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN (NCC) 22-22 Mt. Holly, NJ (NAP) 3-29 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (NPP) 37-14, 37-25, 37-33 Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA (MRO) 26-23 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE (MRO) 26-17 Mud Lake Area, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Mud River, WV (ORH) 17-23 Muddy Creek, Cascade, Vaughn, MT (MRO) 26-24 Muddy Creek Dam, PA (ORP) 18-24 Muddy Creek Near Syracuse, NE (MRO) 26-21 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD (NAB) 4-39 Mulberry Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Multiple Purpose Projects, Including St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-86 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction F-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation E-1 Multnomah Channel, OR (NPP) 37-36 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-38 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-37 Muncie, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Munday, TX (SWF) 30-22 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-47, 10-49 Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-33, S10-43 Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-49 Murder-Goose Neck Creek, Pembroke, NY (NCB) 20-44 Murder-Goose Neck Creek, Corfu, NY (NCB) 20-44 Murderkill River, DE (NAP) 3-8, 3-18, 3-23 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-21 Murray County, GA (SAM) 10-54 1-43 Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR (SWL) 28-4 Murrells Inlet, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-15 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN (ORL) 16-36 Muscatine Harbor, IA (NCR) 23-11 Muscatine Harbor, IA 25-7 Muscatine Island, IA (NCR) 23-8 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District, No. 13, IA (NCC) 23-10, 23-12, 23-15 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County, Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL (NCR) 23-11 Muskegon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-25, 21-60, 21-79 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18 Muskingum River, OH (ORH) 17-20 Mustinka River, MN (NCS) 24-28 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-16 Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC (SAN) 7-19 Mystic River, CT (NED) 1-45 Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Mystic River, MA (NED) 1-45 N N. Fork, Maquoketa River, Cascade, IA (NCR) 23-16 Naches River, Naches, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-22 Nahunta Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-27 Naknek River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN (ORL) 16-38 Namo River, Guam (POD) 36-9 Nandua Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia (POD) 36-3, 36-5, 36-6 Nansemond River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED) 1-55 Nantasket Beach, MA (NED) 1-52 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE and MD (NAB) 4-39 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD (NAB) 4-39 Nanticoke River, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-26, 4-34 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (NED) 1-45 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-52 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-52 Napa River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-39 Napa River, CA (SPK) 35-26, 35-35 Napa River, CA (SPN) 34-7 Napatree Beach, RI (NED) 1-52 Narragansett Pier, RI (NED) 1-53 Narraguagus River, ME (NED) 1-45 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME (NED) 1-21, 1-34, 1-42 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY & VT (NAN) 2-8, 2-19, 2-24 Nashua, NH (NED) 1-49, 1-59 Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-32, 9-48 Natches Port Area, MS (LMK) 12-21 Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20 National Emergency Preparedness Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Mobile District (SAM) 10-28 Omaha District (MRO) 26-9 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities 51-I Navajo Reservoir, NM (SPK) 35-38 Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX (SWF) 30-22 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Navigation Locks and Dams Operable C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction D-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAN) 7-8 Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-15 Louisville District (ORL) 16-3 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-4 Memphis District (LMM) 13-1 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 Nashville District (ORN) 15-4 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-3 New York District (NAN) 2-12 1-44 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-6, 5-9 Omaha District (MRO) 26-2 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Portland District (NPP) 37-6 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle District (NPS) 38-5 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-3 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-3 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-1 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-28 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Nawiliwili Small Boat Hlarbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Neabsco Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Neabsco Creek, VA (1811 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-43 Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Neah Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25 Neale Sound, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL (NCR) 23-12 Neavitt Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier to Beaumont, TX (SWG) 31-38 Nehalem Bay, OR (NPP) 37-36 Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-42 Nelson Run, Ross Township, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWT) 29-26, 29-26 Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-36 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA (NAP) 3-27 Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR (NPP) 37-38 Nestucca River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR (NPP) 37-38 Neuse River, 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern, NC (SAW) 6-27 Neuse River Barrier, NC (SAW) 6-27 Neuse River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-29 Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-27 Neuse River, Oriental, NC (SAW) 6-26 Neva and Olga Straits, AK (NPA) 40-15 Neville Island, PA (ORP) 18-24 New Albany, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 New Amsterdam, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-31 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 New Bedfo)rd and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (NED) 1-45 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-34, 1-42 New Buffalo Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-25, 21-61, 21-79 New Bullards Bar, CA (SPK) 35-39 New Cumberland, WV (ORP) 18-24 New Harbor, ME (NED) 1-45 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-25, 16-30 New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-31 New Haven Breakwater, CT (NED) 1-45 New Haven Harbor, CT (NED) 1-7, 1-29, 1-39, 1-61 New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-19, 3-23 New Jersey Pierhead Channel (NAN) 2-28 New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (ORP) 18-24 New London, CT (NED) 1-49 New London Harbor, CT (NED) 1-45 New Madrid Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-5 New Martinsville, WV (ORH) 17-22 New Matamoras, OH (ORH) 17-22 New Melones Lake, CA (SPK) 35-23 New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-5, 11-9, 11-12 New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-40 New Richmond, OH (ORL) 16-28, 16-31 New River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 New River, NC (SAW) 6-26 New River, Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-26 New River, WV and VA (ORH) 17-20 New Rochelle Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN) 2-98 2-19, 2-24, 2-34 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-9, 2-19, 2-24 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-10, 2-19, 2-25 New York Harbor-Main Ship Channel (NAN) 2-28 1-45 Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, NJ (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) (ORH) 17-21 Newark, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18, 17-24 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA (NPS) 38-27 Newbegun Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) (ORL) 16-24 Newburyport Harbor, MA (NED) 1-7, 1,29, 1-39 Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Newmarket Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14 Newport Harbor, RI (NED) 1-45 Newport, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Newport News Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Newport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Newport, OR (NPP) 37-41 Newport, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Newport-Wilder, KY (ORL) 16-28 Newry-Old Pickens, SC (SAS) 8-23 Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK (SWT) 29-26 Newtown Creek (NAN) 2-29 Niagara Remedial Works, NY (NCB) 20-41 . Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Niagara River, NY (NCB) 20-41 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT (NED) 1-45 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY (ORL) 16-36 Nichols, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-28 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE (MRO) 26-25 Ninilchik Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 Niobrara River (Camrns Bridge), NE (MRO) 26-24 Niobrara River, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-21 Niobrara River-Camrns Bridge, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-21 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-17, 26-22 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-24 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nixon Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-17, 33-32 Nolin Lake, KY (ORL) 16-10, 16-17, 16-33 Nome, AK (NPA) 40-17 Nome Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-10, 40-13 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-39 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-6 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (NED) 1-49 Nookagee Lake, MA (NED) 1-53 Noosack River, above Highway IZ Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Acme, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Everson, WA (NPS) 38-31 Noosack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Whatcom County, WA (NPS) 38-31 Norco Bluff, CA (SPL) 33-31 Norfolk Floodwall, VA (NAO) 5-16 Norfolk Harbor, Eastern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-12 Norfolk Harbor, Southern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-12 Norfolk Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-9, 5-17 Norfolk Harbor, Western Branch, VA (NAO) 5-13 Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-17 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-21 Normal, KY (ORH) 17-22 Noroton Bay, Darien, CT (NED) 1-54 Norrel Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR (SWL) 28-4 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 North Andover and Lawrence, MA (NED) 1-53 North Branch, Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-10, 22-14, 22-20 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-18 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-58 North Canadian above Lake Overholser (SWT) 29-28 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK (SWT) 29-28 1-46 North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK (SWT) 29-27 North Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-15, 2-16, 2-20, 2-26 North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA (SPK) 35-39 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH (NED) 1-53 North Hartland Lake, VT (NED) 1-16, 1-32, 1-56 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED) 1-54 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-59 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA (NED) 1-50 North Nashua River, Leominster, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-34, 1-42 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, NE (MRO) 26-21 North Ridgeville, OH (NCB) 20-44 North River Dike, NC (SAW) 6-27 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-48 North Second Street at Wolf River, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-6 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY (NAN) 2-34 North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL (SAM) 10-49 North Springfield Lake, VT (NED) 1-16, 1-32, 1-56 North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-57 Northeast Cape Fear River, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-26 Northeast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-45 Northeast River, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-26 Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-19, 1-33, 1-58 Northhampton, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Northport Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Northport Harbor, WI (1975 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-89 Northport Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-85 Norwalk, Ct (NED) 1-50 Norwalk Harbor, CT (NED) 1-45 Norwalk-Wilton, CT (NED) 1-53 Norwich, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-60 Norwich, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Nottoway River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Noxubee River, MS (SAM) 10-46 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS (SAM) 10-47 Noyo River and Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-5, 34-7 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-17 O O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 O'Hare Reservoir, IL (NCC) 22-11, 22-16, 22-20 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND (MRO) 26-8, 26-12, 26-16, 26-19 Oahe Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-24 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-48 Oak Orchard Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-34 Oak St. Bridge, Midland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Oakdale, PA (ORP) 18-23 Oakford Special Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-48 Oakland Harbor (Deepen Tidal Canal), CA (SPN) 34-13 Oakland Harbor (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge), CA (SPN) 34-13 Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-1, 34-7, 34-11 Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA (SAS) 8-8, 8-13, 8-19, 8-22 Obey River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Obion River, TN (LMM) 13-5 Occohannock Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-15 Occoquan Creek, VA (NAB) 4-39 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-30 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-43 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-26, 4-34 Ocean City, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-48 Oceana, WV (ORH) 17-21 Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-14, 33-22, 33-30, 33-32 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-30 Oceanside, Sand By-pass, CA (SPL) 33-24, 33-15, 33-19 Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla County, FL (SAM) 10-48 Oconto Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-26, 21-61, 21-79 Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, NC (SAW) 6-27 Ocracoke Island, NC (SAW) 6-27 Oelwein, Fayette County, IA (NCR) 23-16 1-47 Ofu Airstrip (West End), American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-41 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 17-8, 17-14 Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) (ORL) 16-10, 16-18, 16-20 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 15-5, 15-12, 15-17 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY (ORL) 16-36, 16-38 Ohio River, Chester, WV (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY (ORL) 16-38 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY (ORL) 16-36, 16-38 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Moundsville, WV (detalied project report) (ORP) 18-30 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Ohio County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Switzerland County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Ohio River, Troy, IN (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-36 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN (ORL) 16-36 Oil Branch Creek, Coffeyville, KS (SWT) 29-27 Oil City Ice Control Structures, PA (ORP) 18-22 Oil City, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-30 Oil City, Titusville, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Oil Creek, Oil City, Venango County, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-12 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-25 Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Omak, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Oroville, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-29 Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM) 10-20, 10-33, 10-43 Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-40 Oklahoma City, Floodway, OK (SWT) 29-27 Oklahoma City LPP, OK (SWT) 29-25 Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-30, 9-40 Oktassi Creek, AL (SAM) 10-54 Olcott Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-35 Old Field Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-26 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK (NPA) 40-11 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-47 Old Kingstree Canal, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Old River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Oldmans Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Olean, NY (ORP) 18-22 Oliver Hill, KY (ORH) 17-24 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-31, 10-38 Olympia Harbor (1945 R&H Act), WA (NPS) 38-29 Olympia Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21 Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-17, 26-19, 26-21 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Onancock River, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Oneida Creek, NY (NCB) 20-44 Oneonta, NY (NAB) 4-44 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY (NCB) 20-43 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-26, 21-61, 21-79 Oologah Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Oologah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-23, 29-26 Oostanaula River, GA (SAM) 10-54 Open-channel work, Ohio River (ORP) 18-3 Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-15 1-48 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 19-3, 19-5, 19-6 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORL) 16-3 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-23 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-23 Optima Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-18, 29-23 Oracoke Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-24 Orange River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Orange Road, Mercer County, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR (NPP) 37-36 Orleans, IN (ORL) 16-28 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID (NPW) 39-16 Orowoc Creek, NY (NAN) 2-34 Orwell Lake, MN (NCS) 24-31 Orwell River (Otter Tail River), MN 24-28 Osage River, KS and MO (MRK) 27-20 Osage River, MO lock and dam (MRK) 27-16 Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Osborne Park Inlets, Willoughby, OH (NCB) 20-45 Osceola Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-5 Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-29 Oswego Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-35 Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Ottawa, IL (NCR) 23-16 Ottawa, OH (NCB) 20-43 Ottawa, OH (NCB) 20-43 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Ottawa River Harbor, MI and OH (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-35 Otter Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-16, 1-32, 1-56 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR (SWL) 28-22 Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-34 Otter Tail River, MN (NCS) 24-28 Otto Creek, Leshara, NE (MRO) 26-24 Ottumwa, IA (NCR) 23-12 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-13, 12-16 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (LMK) 12-18 Ouachita River Levees, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-11 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-16 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, NY (NCB) 20-43 Owego, NY (NAB) 4-44 Owens, CA (SPK) 35-43 Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-28, 16-31 Owl Creek, West Carrolton, OH (ORL) 16-38 Owl's H[lead Harbor, ME (NED) 1-45 Owyhee River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Oxford, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-30 Oyster Channel, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Oyster Creek, TX (SWG) 31-38 Ozan Creek, AR (LMK) 12-18 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 13), AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17 Ozona, FL channel and turning basin (SAJ) 9-51 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Pablo Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Paducah, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Pagan River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-24 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH (ORH) 17-24 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 Paint Rock River, AL (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Painted Post, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL) 33-6, 33-16, 33-25 Paintsville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-8, 17-15, 17-19 Pajaro River, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-30 Pajaro River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-32, 9-48 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-48, 9-52 Palm Beach, FL side channel and basin (SAJ) 9-51 Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-30, 9-40 1-49 Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Pamona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS Pamunkey River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-15 Panacea Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-46, 10-50 Panima City Beaches, FL (SAM) 10-41 Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-14, 10-32, 10-41 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Panther Creek, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-36 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL (NCR) 23-16 Panther Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-11, 26-14 Parish Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 Park City, KS (SWT) 29-27 Park River, Hartford, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Park Row Bridge, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Parker Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Parker Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-23 Parkersburg, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Parrots Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV (complete) (ORP) 18-30 . Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-14, 10-32, 10-41 Pascagoula River, MS (SAM) 10-46 Pasquotank River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51! Pass Christian Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-46 Pass Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-14 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-15, 2-20, 2-26 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME (NED) 1-51 Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-23 Patchogue River, CT (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Patoka Lake, IN (ORL) 16-10, 16-18, 16-33. Patoka River, Jasper, IN (ORL) 16-37 Patoka River, Winslow, IN (ORL) 16-37 Patriot, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-31 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 1-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation (MRK) 27-18 Patuxent River, MD (NAB) 4-39 Paw Paw Lake, MI (NCE) 21-86 Pawcatuck, CT (NED) 1-50 ,. Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI & CT (NED) 1-53 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT (NED) 1-45 Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Pawtucket, RI (NED) 1-53 Pawtuxet Cove, RI (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-50, 1-56 Pax, WV (ORH) 17-24 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID (NPW) 39-16 Payette Valley, ID (NPW) 39-17 Pea & Choctawhatchee Rivers, Geneva, AL (SAM) 10-49 Pea River, Elba, AL (SAM) 10-49 Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-49 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA (SAS) 8-22 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (LMK) 12-6, 12-11, 12-13 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS (LMK) 12-21 Pearl River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Pearson-Skubitz Bill Hill Lake, KS (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-23 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-11, 26-14, 26-22, 26-24 Pecan Bayou, TX (SWT) 29-28 Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI (NCR) 23-14 Peckskill Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Peconic River (NAN) 2-29 Pecos, TX (SWA) 32-19 Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Pelican Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-29 Pembina River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 Pembina River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Pembroke Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR (NPP) 37-40 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR (NPP) 37-37, 37-40, 37-42 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR (NPP) 37-38 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY (ORL) 16-38 Penn Township, Butler County, PA (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 1-50 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCC) 23-15 Penny Slough, Rock River, IL (NCR) 23-12 Penobscot River, ME (NED) 1-45, 1-50 Pensacola Bay, FL to Mobile Bay, AL (SAM) 10-39 Pensacola Beach, FL (SAM) 10-49 Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-15, 10-32, 10-42, 10-50 Pensacola Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 , Pensaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-27, 21-61, 21-79 Pentwater Harbor, MI (1892 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-89 Pentwater Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-27, 21-62, 21-80 Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-13 Peoria Levees, IL (NCR) 23-14 Pepin Harbor, WI 25-7 Pepper Creek, DE (NAP) 3-27 Pepperell Cove, ME (NED) 1-45 Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Percosin Creek and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-54 Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM) 10-15, 10-32, 10-42, 10-50 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-22, 1-34, 1-42 Permenant International Association of Navigation Congresses 47-1 Perquimans River, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-26 Perry County Drainage and Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, MO (LSM) 14-17 Perry Creek, IA (MRO) 26-15, 26-11, 26-14 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (MRK) 27-11, 27-5, 27-14 Perry Road, Hutton Br., Carroll, TX (SWF) 30-23 Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-35 Perth Amboy Channel (NAN) 2-28 Perth Amboy, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Petaha Creek, Pomeroy, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Petaluma River, CA (SPN) 34-8 Petersburg Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Petersburg, WV (NAB) 4-14, 4-28, 4-37 Petit Jean River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Petit Jean River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous. LA (LMN) 11-14 Petoskey Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Peyton Creek, TX (SWG) 31-38 Phillipi, WV (initial appraisal) (ORP) 18-30 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL (SAJ) 9-52 Phillips Lake, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-59 Philpott Lake, VA (SAW) 6-15, 6-16, 6-20 Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Including New River)(Stage 2 and Remaining Work) (SPL) 33-7, 33-16, 33-25 Picacho, CA (SPL) 33-32 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-6, 27-14 Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) (MRO), 26-6, 26-14 Pickens County, AL (SAM) 10-54 Pierce, NE (MRO) 26-17, 26-21 Pig Island Gut, ME (NED) 1-45 Pigeon Cove Harbor, MA (NED) 1-61 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pilchuck River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pillar Point Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-32 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-8, 33-16, 33-27 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection (LMK) 12-18 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN (NCS) 24-23 Pine Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-23 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-30 Pine Ford Lake, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-9 Pine Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-22 Pine River, MI (NCE) 21-85 Pinellas County, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-32, 9-48 Pineville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Pineville, Red River, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Piney Creek, Spring City, TN (ORN) 15-18 Pinole Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Pinole Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, CO (Sec. 212) (SWA) 32-19 Pioneer Lake, KS (MRK) 27-18 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN (ORL) 16-38 Pipestem Lake, ND (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-15 Pithlachascotee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA (ORP) 18-21 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 18-24 1-51 Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-58 Placer Creek, ID (NPS) 38-27 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN (LMM) 13-6 Planning and Engineering (SWG) 31-18 Planning Assistance to States (SAS) 8-11 Planning Engineering and Design (NED) 1-27 Plants Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-17 Platte River and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-17 Platte River, Ashland, NE (MRO) 26-21 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, NE (MRO) 26-21 Platte River, Brady, NE (MRO) 26-21 Platte River, Cedar Creen, NE (MRO) 26-24 Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley, NE (MRO) 26-21 Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue, NE (MRO) 26-21 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, NE (MRO) 26-21 Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement (MRK) 27-17 Platte River near Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-17 Platte River, Near North Bend, NE (MRO) 26-21 Plattsburgh Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Pleasant Bay, MA (NED) 1-53 Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN (ORL) 16-38 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (NED) 1-50 Pleasant River, ME (NED) 1-45 Pleasanton, TX (SWF) 30-22 Plum Creek at New Haven Township, MN (NCS) 24-29 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, CO (MRO) 26-20 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE (MRO) 26-25 Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY (ORL) 16-36 Plum Island, MA (NED) 1-48 Plum Island Waste Treatment Plant, SC (SAW) 7-21 Plymouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-45, 1-61 Plymouth, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Poca, WV (ORH) 17-23 Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-43 Pocomoke River, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-43 Pocomoke River, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4-26, 4-358 Pocotaligo River, Manning, SC (SAN) 7-21 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-38 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Point Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-55 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (NED) 1-7, 1-30, 1-39, 1-61 Point Judith, RI (NED) 1-53 Point Lookout Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-62, 21-80 Point Place, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-43 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT (NPS) 38-25 Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX (SWF) 30-23 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-45 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Pomeroy, OH (ORH) 17-22 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15, 27-20 Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO (MRK) 27-19 Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15 Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, (MRK) 27-20 Pompion Hill, SC (SAN) 7-21 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-30, 9-41, 9-53 Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-11, 9-30, 9-41 Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Pond Creek, Cheatham County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Pontiac Diversion, RI (NED) 1-53 Poplar Brook, Monmouth, NJ (NAN) 2-36 Poppenessett Spit, Mashpee, MA (NED) 1-54 Popperdam Creek, North Charleston, SC (SAN) 7-21 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT (NED) 1-50 Port Alexander (Inner Harbor), AK (NPA) 40-16 Port Alexander, AK (NPA) 40-15 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25, 28-29 Port Arthur and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21, 31-36 Port Chester Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 Port Clinton Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-36 Port Dickerson, NY (NAB) 4-44 Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-41, 9-53 1-52 Port Gamble Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25, 28-29 Port Henry Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Port Hueneme, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15, 33-22 Port Jefferson Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Port Lions, AK (NPA) 40-15 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-10, 40-13 Port of Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-41 Port of Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-37 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR (NPP) 37-41 Port Ontario Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-36 Port Orchard Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25 Port Orford, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-23, 37-31 Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-16 Port San Luis Shore and Bluff Erosion (SPL) 33-30 Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-62, 21-80 Port St. Joe, FL (SAM) 10-46, 10-50 Port Townsend, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Port Washington Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-28, 21-63, 21-80 Port Wing Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-29, 21-63, 21-80 Portage Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-29, 21-63, 21-80 Portage, PA (ORP) 18-22 Portage, WI (NCS) 24-10, 24-20, 24-32 Porter Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Portersville Bay-East, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-20, 10-33, 10-43 Portersville Bay-West, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-21, 10-32, 10-42 Portland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-45 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-36 Portland, OH (ORH) 17-22 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit (NPW) 39-18 Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (NED) 1-8, 1-30, 1-40 Portsmouth Harbor, NH (NED) 1-61 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordinance Depot, (NAO) 5-15 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SAJ) 9-23, 9-33, 9-49 Portville, NY (ORP) 18-22 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX (SWF) 30-23 Posten Bayou, AR and LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR (SWT) 29-24 Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 Potlatch River, ID (NWP) 39-18 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-8, 4-26, 4-35 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-39 Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC (NAB) 4-8, 4-26, 4-35 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA (NAB) 4-9, 4-26, 4-35 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD (NAB) 4-39 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA (NAB) 4-26, 4-35, 4-39 Potomac River at North Side of Washington Channel, DC (NAB) 4-39 Potomac River Below Washington, DC (NAB) 4-9, 4-26, 4-35 Potowomut River, RI (NED) 1-45 Pottsburg Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Pottstown, PA (NAP) 3-29 Poverty Point, LA (LMK) 12-22 Powder Horn Branch, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Powder River, Arvada, WY (MRO) 26-24 Powder River, Broadus, MT (MRO) 26-25 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT (NPS) 38-27 Powhaten Point, OH (ORP) 18-24 Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI 25-7 Prairie du Chien, WI (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL (SAM) 10-47 Preconstruction Engineering and Design - See Advance Engineering and Design Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Presque Isle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-63, 21-80 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME (NED) 1-50 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17, 14-18 Prestonsburg, KY (ORH) 17-24 Prestonville, KY (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-27, 4-35 Princeton, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 1-53 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-33, 10-44 Proctor Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Proctor, WV (ORP) 18-24 Proctorville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Project Condition Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Portland District (NPP) 37-7 S Seattle District (NPS) 38-6 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (SAS) 8-8 (SWG) 31-17 Projects Specifically Authorized Under the Former California Debris Commission 35-1A Prompton Lake, PA (NAP) 3-15, 3-20, 3-25 Prospect Beach, West Haven CT (NED) 1-9, 1-30, 1-40 Prosperity Lake, MO (SWL) 28-23 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA (NPS) 38-25 Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Providence River and Harbor, RI (NED) 1-45 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA (NED) 1-53 Provincetown Harbor, MA (NED) 1-45 Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Pt. Pleasant, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Puckett Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-63 Pudding River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Pueblo, Arkansas River, CO (Floodway levee extension) (SWA) 32-19 Puerco River, Gallup, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-13, 32-16 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-22 Pullman, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Pultneyville Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-41 Pumpkinville Creek, Emerson, GA (SAM) 10-47 Punaluu Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Pungo Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Pungo River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Punta Salinas, PR (SAJ) 9-52 Punxsatawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13, 18-18 Punxsutawney, PA (ORP) 18-22 Put in Bay, OH (NCB) 20-41 Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-27 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-32 Queens Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Queenstown Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA (NPS) 38-27 Quillayute River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-29 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22, 38-30 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quinby Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-17 Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Quincy Harbor, IL 25-8 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 23-11 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy MA (NED) 1-48 R R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-23 R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-23 R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (SAM) 10-21, 10-33, 10-44 Raccoon Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Raccoon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-16 Racine HIarbor, WI (1945 R&HI Act and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-89 Racine, OH (ORH) 17-22 Rahway, NJ (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Rahway River, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Rainbow Valley, San Diego, CA (SPL) 33-32 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Ralston & Leydon Creeks, CO (MRO) 26-23 Ramapo River, Monroe, NJ (NAN) 2-36 Rancocas River, NJ (NAP) 3-30 Randleman Lake, NC (SAW) 6-16 1-54 Ranier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37, 37-38 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, SD (MRO) 26-20 Rapid Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-17, 26-20 Rapidan River, Orange, VA (NAO) 5-16 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA (NAO) 5-15 Rappahannock River, VA (NAO) 5-15 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-11 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN) 2-16, 2-28, 2-32 Raritan River (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Raritan River Cut-off (NAN) 2-29 Rat Root River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Rathburn Lake, Chariton River, IA (MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-15 Rathburn Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 27-17 Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Raymondville Drain, TX (SWG) 31-15 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-26, 4-37 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-10 Charleston District (SAN) 7-7 Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-5 Mobile District (SAM) 10-17 New England Division (NED) 1-9, 1-61 New York District (NAN) 2-12 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-17 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-28 Red Arroyo, San Angelo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Red Bluff, CA (SPK) 35-41 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA (NED) 1-45 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN (NCS) 24-23 Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red Lake River at Huot, MN (NCS) 24-24 Red Lake River, East Grand Forks, MN (NCS) 24-30 Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN (NCS) 24-1 1, 24-20 Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN (NCS) 24-30 Red Lake River, Red Lake County, Hwy 3, MN (NCS) 24-30 Red Lake River, State Highway 32, MN (NCS) 24-11, 24-20 Red River Bank Stabilization below Denison, OK and TX (SWT) 29-25 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA and OK (SWT) 29-28 Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX and OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, OK and AR (SWL) 28-19 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7, 12-14 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabiliation (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-19 Red River below Fulton, AR (LMK) 12-16 Red River, Clay City, KY (ORL) 16-38 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Red River from Fulton, AR to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 29-24 Red River, Hwy 71, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16 Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-33 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND (NCS) 24-12, 24-21, 24-28 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND (NCS) 24-30 Red River of the North at Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-24 Red River of the North, Oxbow, ND (NCS) 24-30 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-24 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red River of the North, MN and ND (NCS) 24-23 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN (NCS) 24-24 1-55 Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN (NCS) 24-30 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-24 Red River of the North, County Road 2, ND (NCS) 24-30 Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red River Parish, LA (LMK) 12-22 Red River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-14 Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK and TX (LMK) 12-16 Red River-Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX (LMK) 12-16 Red River-Waterway-Shreveport, LA to Index, AR (LMK) 12-8, 12-11, 12-14 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (1970 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-88 Red Wing Harbor, MN 25-7 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-29 Redbank Creek Lake, PA (ORP) 18-24 Redbird Creek, O'Neill, NE (MRO) 26-21 Reddies River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-26 (SAN) 7-18 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-15, 33-22, Redstone Creek, Redstone, PA (ORP) 18-30 Redwater River and Hay Creek, Belle Fourche, SD (MRO) 26-18 Redwood City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 Redwood Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Redwood River below Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-24 Redwook Creek, Humboldt County, CA (SPK) 35-39 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-10 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR (NPP).37-39 Reedy River, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-19 Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV (SPK) 35-39 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Regulatory Functions Program Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness 50-1 Rehobo)th Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE (NAP) 3-30 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA (LMN) 11-14 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida, (SAJ) 9-12, 9-31, 9-42 Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMM) 13-5 Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) 12-16 Removing Water Hyacinths (SAM) 10-46 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-17 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (NCB) 20-13, 20-23 Republican River, NE and KS (MRK) 27-20 Research and Development Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 Savannah District (SAS) 8-12 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-19, 24-22, 24-27, 24-31 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR (NPP) 37-39 Revere Beach, MA (NED) 1-9, 1-30, 1-40 Reynoldsville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Rheem Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Rheem Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-25 Rialto Channel, CA (SPL) 33-32 Rice Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-10, 8-14, 8-20 Richland Creek, IL (LSM) 14-18 Richland Lake, MO (MRK) 27-19 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-16 Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA (SPN) 34-2, 34-8, 34-11 Richmond Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Richmond Local Flood Protection, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-9, 5-13 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Richwood and Fenwick, WV (ORH) 17-24 Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-45 1-56 Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River) (ORP) 18-23 Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) (ORP) 18-22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY (ORH) 17-24 Rillito River, AZ (SPL) 33-12, 33-17 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Coamo, Parcelas Velezquez, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR (SAJ) 9-63, Rio De La Plata, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio El Ojo De Aqua, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Fajardo, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Grande Basin, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-14, 32-17 Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-14, 32-17, 32-18 Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-14, 32-17 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Jacaguas at Juanna Dizz, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Manati, Bareceloneta, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Ripley, OH (ORH) 17-22, 17-24 Ririe Lake, ID (NPW) 39-16 Rising Sun, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 River des Peres, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-13 River Rouge, MI (NCE) 21-86 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-33, 1-41, 1-57 Riverland Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-18 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds Mobile District (SAM) 10-29 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA (NPW) 39-16 Riverside Levees (SPL) 33-32 Riverview, WV (ORH) 17-22 Roanoak Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Roanoke Island, Dare County, NC (SAW) 6-30 Roanoke River, 50-mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon (SAW) 6-27 Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-29 Roanoke River, NC (SAW) 6-24 Roanoke River Upper Basin, VA Headwaters Area (SAW) 6-13, 6-20 Roaring River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-26 Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC (SAN) 7-18 Roaring Springs Road, Bridge, TX (SWF) 30-23 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF) 30-11, 30-16, 30-20 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-26, 10-35 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15-18), OK (SWT) 29-26 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-24 Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Rochester Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-9, 20-19 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-14 Rochester, MN (NCS) 24-12, 24-21 Rochester, PA (ORP) 18-24 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek, Maxwell, IA (NCR) 23-16 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek Road, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Hall Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 Rock Island Harbor, IL 25-7 Rock Island, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL (NCR) 23-13 Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY (NAN) 2-12, 2-20, 2-25 Rockfish Creek, NC (SAW) 6-27 Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-12 Rockland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Rockland Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-46 Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-46 Rockport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Rockport, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS (SAM) 10-54 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 Rocky Pass, AK (NPA) 40-15 Rocky River, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-20, 20-36 Rocy Fork, OH (ORH) 17-23 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rogers City Harbor, MI (1910 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Rogue River, Grants Pass, OR (NPP) 37-43 1-57 1 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-23, 37-31 Rogue River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY (ORL) 16-38 Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Rollison Channel, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Rome, Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-47 Rome, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Rome, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Rome Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-34 Rondout Harbor (NAN) 2-29 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME (NED) 1-9, 1-30, 1-41 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-22 Root River at Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-24 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA (SPL) 33-32 Roseau River, MN (NCS) 24-13, 24-21, 24-30 Rosedale Harbor, MS (LMK) 12-16 Rosendale, NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Roseville, OH (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19, 17-24 Rosiclaire, IL (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Rossview Lake, TN and KY (ORN) 15-14 Rota Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7. Rouge River, MI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Rouge River, MI (1958 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Rouge River, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Rouge River, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-64, 21-80 Rough River, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-30, 16-32, 16-36 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY (ORL) 16-11, 16-18 Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NED) 1-22, 1-35, 1-42 Roundhouse Bridge, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-48 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-29 Rouseville, PA (ORP) 18-23 Rowlesburg Lake, WV (ORP) 18-23 Royal River, ME (NED) 1-46 Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-9, 5-13 Ruffy Brook, MN (NCS) 24-26 Rumphs Hill Creek, Dorchester County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-23 Rushford, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-30 Russell Creek, SC (SAN) 7-19 Russell, KY (ORH) 17-21 Russian River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-18, 35-31, 35-36, 35-42, 35-43 Russian River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Russian River Channel Improvements (East Fork) (SPK) 35-44 Rutland Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-34 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 Rye Creek, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, NH (NED) 1-46, 1-61 S S. River Drainage District, Marion County, MO (NCR) 23-16 Sabana Grande, PR (SAJ) 9-63 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-20, 31-32, 31-39, 31-41, 31-46 Sabine River and Tributaries (Echo to Morgan Bluff), TX (SWG) 31-38 Sabula, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Sackets Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-41 Saco, MT (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Saco River ME (NED) 1-8, 1-30, 1-40 Saco River ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-49 Sacramento River and Tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-31, 35-37, 35-44, 35-45 Sacramento River, CA (SPK) 35-2, 35-28, 35-36 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-28 Sacramento River, Tehama, CA (SPK) 35-45 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-17 Sag Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Saginaw River, MI (NCE) 21-31, 21-40, 21-64, 21-68, 21-81, 21-84 Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-10 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (NED) 1-46 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Sakonnet River, RI (NED) 1-46 Salamanca, NY (ORP) 18-22 Salamonie Lake, IN (ORL) 16-11, 16-18 Salem Harbor, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 1-58 Salem River, NJ (NAP) 3-9, 3-19, 3-24 Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Salinas River, CA (SPK) 35-39 Saline Point, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Saline River & Tributaries, IL (ORL) 16-24, 16-36 Saline River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-58 Salkahatchie River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR (NPP) 37-39 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA (NPP) 37-39 Salmon River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Salmon River, Colchester, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Salmon River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-15 Salt Creek Levees, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-24 Salt Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-21 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT (SPK) 35-39 Saluda River, SC (SAN) 7-18 Salyersville, KY (ORL) 16-4, 16-15, 16-22 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (SWF) 30-11, 30-17, 30-20 Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Sammamish River, WA (NPS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Antonio Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA (SPL) 33-30 San Diego Creek, Alice, TX (SWG) 31-38 San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-22 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-24 San Francisco Bay-Delta Model Structure, CA (SPN) 34-3, 34-8 San Francisco Bay-Delta Model Structure, CA (SPN) 34-3, 34-8 San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA (SPN) 34-4, 34-8 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels), CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-28 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPN) 34-3, 34-8 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift) (SPN) 34-8 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-30 San Gabriel River, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel (SPL) 33-32 San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-28, 35-42 San Juan Dam (SPL) 33-34 San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-14, 9-31, 9-43 San Juan, PR (SAJ) 9-52 San Leandro Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Lorenzo Creek (Upper Portion), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 San Lorenzo River, CA (SPN) 34-14 San Lorenzo River, CA (SPK) 35-39 San Luis Rey River, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-24 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (SPN) 34-9 San Pablo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 San Rafael Canal, CA (SPN) 34-9 San Rafael Creek, CA (SPN) 34-9 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-50 Sand Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI (NED) 1-48 Sand Island, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Sand Lake, OK (SWT) 29-25 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY (NAN) 2-32 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI (NCS) 24-13, 24-21 Sandusky Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-20, 20-36 Sandusky River, OH (NCB) 20-41 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA (NED) 1-46 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN (LMM) 13-6 Sandy Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo (NAN) 2-29 Sandy Hook Bay, NJ (NAN) 2-29 Sandy Hook Channel (NAN) 2-28 1-59 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-12, 2-20, 2-26, 2-31 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-38 Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-26, 37-33, 37-42 Sangamon River (Mouth), IL (NCR) 23-12 Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL (NCR) 23-15 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK (SWT) 29-26 Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-17 Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-26, 33-27 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-15, 33-24 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, CA (SPL) 33-32 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Santa Cruz County, CA (SPN) 34-13 Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-9 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, NM (SWA) 32-19 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL) 33-13, 33-17 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-15 Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) (SPL) 33-32 Santee River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-17 Sapelo Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-21 Sarasota County, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-33, 9-48 Sardis Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-23 Sardis, OH (ORH) 17-22 Sasanoa River, ME (NED) 1-46 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-48 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (NCE) 21-35, 21-65, 21-83 Saugerties Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA (NED) 1-54 Saugus River and Tributaries, MA (NED) 1-22, 1-35, 1-42 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY (NAN) 2-36 Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Savage River Dam, MD (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-50, 9-63 Savanna Harbor, IL 25-7 Savannah City Park, TN (ORN) 15-18 Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-4, 8-13, 8-17 Savannah River above Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-21 Savannah River at Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-21, 8-22 Savannah River Basin, GA and SC (SAS) 8-9 Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes (SAS) 8-23 Savannah River Below Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-13, 8-19 Saw Mill Run, PA (ORP) 18-22 Saw Mill Run Road, Salamanca, NY (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, NY (NAN) 2-32 Saxis Island, VA (NAO) 5-16 Saxon Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-85 Saxonville, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-59 Saylorville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Scajaquada Creek, NY (NCB) 20-43 Scammon Bay, AK (NPA) 40-16 Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-37 Scappoose, OR (NPP) 37-42 Scarboro River, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-22 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 Kansas City District (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-9 Mobile District (SAM) 10-30 Omaha District (MRO) 26-7 Portland District (NPP) 37-14 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 Seattle District (NPS) 38-9 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-11 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-3 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 Schuyler, Lost Creek and Platte River, NE (MRO) 26-21 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA (NAP) 3-27 Schuylkill River, PA (NAP) 3-10, 3-19, 3-24 Scioto River at Portsmith, OH (ORH) 17-20 1-60 Sciotovile, OH (ORH) 17-22 Scituate Harbor, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Scott County D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-18 Scotts Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Scotts Creek, VA (NAO) 5-13 Scottsville, VA (NAO) 5-16 Scranton, Buffalo, ND (MRO) 26-20 Scranton, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Scuppernong River, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-27 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (NED) 1-48 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Searsport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Seaside Park, CT (NED) 1-48 Seattle Harbor (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-29 Seattle Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22 Seattle Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-30 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME (NED) 1-50 Sebewaing Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-35, 21-83 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI (NCE) 21-41, 21-66, 21-84 Seekonk River, RI (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Seldovia Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY (NCB) 20-42 Seneca Falls, NY (NCB) 20-45 Sepulva Dam, CA (SPL) 33-33-9, 33-17, 33-28 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sequoyah Hills Park, Phase II, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sergius Whitestone, AK (NPA) 40-15 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA (SPL) 33-32 Sesuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Seveir River near Redmond, UT (SPK) 35-39 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR (NPW) 39-16 Sewage Lagoons, South Canadian River (SWT) 29-28 Seward Expansion, AK (NPA) 40-17 Seward Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (completed) (ORP) 18-30 Sewerline Protection Valley, AL (SAM) 10-47 Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 Shad Landing State Park. MD (NAB) 4-39 Shallotte River, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Shallow Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-44 Shark River, NJ (NAN) 2-28 2-30 Shawnee, OK (SWT) 29-29 Shawneetown, IL (ORL) 16-24, 16-28, 16-32, 16-35 Sheboygan Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-36, 21-66, 21-83 Sheburne, NY (NAB) 4-44 Sheepshead Bay (NAN) 2-30 Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-58 Sheffield Water Intake, AL (ORN) 15-18 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH (NED) 1-50 Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-21 Shell Creek, NE (MRO) 26-18 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Shelton Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks, WY (MRO) 26-20 Sheridan, OR (NPP) 37-42 Sheridan, WY (MRO) 26-17 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT (NED) 1-48 Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-14, 24-21, 24-26 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND (NCS) 24-24 Shidler Lake, OK (SWT) 29-25 Shields River, near Clyde Park, MT (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) (MRO) 26-25 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-25 Shinnecock Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-10, 2-20, 2-25, 2-28 Shipyard River, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-16, 7-17 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) (ORL) 16-28 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR (NWP) 39-16 Shooters Island, NJ & NY (NAN) 2-34 Short Beach, CT (NED) 1-48 Short Creek, Connorville, OH (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, WY (MRO) 26-20 1-61 Shoshone River, Byron, MW (MRO) 26-20 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-28, 2-30, 2-34 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Shupe Run. Mt. Pleasant, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Siasconset Beach, Nantucket, MA (NED) 1-54 Sid Simpson Project, IL (NCR) 23-12 Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-34 Sierra Vista, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (NED) 1-48, 1-53, 1-54 Silver Creek, Rome, GA (SAM) 10-47 Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-23 Simmons Bay, NC (SAW) 6-26 Simms Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21, 31-36 Simpson Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Sims Park, Euclid, OH (NCB) 20-22, 20-39 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX (SWF) 30-23 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River, SD (MRO) 26-20, 26-23 Sioux Falls, SD (MRO) 26-17 Sisterville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Sitka Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-10, 40-14, 40-15 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Siuslaw River Near Florence, OR (NPP) 37-41 Siuslaw River, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-23, 37-31 Six Bridge Lake, MD & PA (NAB) 4-43 Six Runs Creek, NC (SAW) 6-27 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Skagit County, West Mt. Vernon, WA (NPS) 38-31 Skagit River (Avon Pass), WA (NPS) 38-29 Skagit River (Levee and Channel Improvements), WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-29 Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-29 Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-25 Skagway Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Skagway River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA (NPP) 37-40 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Skamokawa Creek, WA (NPP) 37-36, 37-42 Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-19, 29-23 Skiatook, OK (SWT) 29-29 Skipanon Channel, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-24, 37-32, 37-42 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA (NPS) 38-28 Slaughter Creek, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-36 Slovan, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL (LSM) 14-18 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL (LSM) 14-18 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-16 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA (NED) 1-50 Smith Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 Smith Ferry, PA (ORP) 18-24 Smith River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), NC (SAW) 6-24 Smithfield, WV (ORH) 17-24 Smithland, KY (ORL) 16-28 Smithneck Creek, Loyalton, CA (SPK) 35-45 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), NC (SAW) 6-24 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-7, 27-12, 27-15 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Soloman Rivers (MRK) 27-20 Smyrna River, DE (NAP) 3-27 Snake River, Alvarado, MN (NCS) 24-14, 24-21 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID (NPW) 39-8, 39-11, 39-14, 39-23 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID (NPW) 39-16 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Snake River, Vega/Sandsville, MN (NCS) 24-31 Snake River, Warren, MN (NCS) 24-31 Snettisham, AK (NPA) 40-7, 40-10, 40-14 Snohomish County, Index to Monroe, WA (NPS) 38-31 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA (NPS) 38-28 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA (NPS) 38-28 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA (NPS) 38-28 Sny Basin, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 1-62 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15, 23-16 Soap Creek, Bridge Site #3, Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-16 Soap Creek, WA (NPP) 37-40 Socastee Creek, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries or Rio Grande, NM (SWA) 32-19 Soldier River, Near Ute, IA (MRO) 26-23 Soldiers and Palmetto Creeks, AL (SAM) 10-48 Soleduck River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA (NAB) 4-15, 4-28, 4-37 Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (NAB) 4-15, 4-28, 4-37 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project (SPN) 34-9 Sonomo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-39 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA (SAM) 10-47 Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Souris River Basin, ND (NCS) 24-15, 24-21 Souris River, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-24 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR Tucker Lakes (SWL) 28-23 South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-23 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL, (NCR) 23-13 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South Beloit, IL (NCR) 23-14 South Bristol Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 South Channel, Government Island, OR (NPP) 37-36 South Coventry Lake, CT (NED) 1-53 South Creek, Martinburg, NE (MRO) 26-21 South Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 South Deer Creek, OK (SWT) 29-27 South Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-32 South Fork, Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 South Fork, Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-48 South Fork, Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-17 South Fork, Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID (NPW) 39-16 South Fork, Elkhorn River, Ewing, NE (MRO) 26-25 South Fork of Cumberland River, KY (ORN) 15-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA (SPL) 33-32 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN (ORL) 16-37, 16-39 South Haven Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-36, 21-66, 21-83 South Holston River, Kingsport, TN (ORN) 15-18 South Llano River, Junction, TX (SWF) 30-23 South Main Channel, TX (SWG) 31-14 South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-88 South Orange, NJ (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington Street, Water and Sanitary District, CO (MRO) 26-21 South Platte River Basin, CO (MRO) 26-6, 26-15 South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 (MRO) 26-21 South Platte River, Iliff, CO (MRO) 26-21 South Platte River, Kersey, CO (MRO) 26-21 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO (MRO) 26-17 South Platte River, Logan County Bridge, NE (MRO) 26-25 South Platte River/Merino, Logan City, CO (MRO) 26-25 South Platte River, Merino, CO (MRO) 26-21 South Platte River, Platteville, CO (MRO) 26-21 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO (MRO) 26-25 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 87, CO (MRO) 26-25 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO (MRO) 26-25 South Plymouth Lake, NY (NAB) 4-43 South Point, OH (ORH) 17-22 South Pole Cat Creeks, Lacoste, TX (SWF) 30-23 South Portsmouth, KY (ORH) 17-22 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South River, Conway, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 South River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South River, NC (SAW) 6-24 South Skunk River Logjam, Keokuk, IA (NCR) 23-16 South Slough (Charleston), OR (NPP) 37-36 1-63 South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE (MRO) 26-25 South Turnbridge Lake, VT (NED) 1-53 South Two River, MN (NCS) 24-31 South Williamson, KY (ORH) 17-24 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-10, 1-31, 1-41 Southeast Missouri Port, MO (LSM) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-15, 4-38 Southport Beach, CT (NED) 1-48 Southport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-46 Southwest Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development (ORL) 16-25 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-15, 16-35 Southwind Maritime Center, Mt. Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-38 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-34, 10-44, 10-47 Spanish Fork River, UT (SPK) 35-41 Spokane River, Spokane, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-29 Sporthaven Beach, Brookings, OR (NPP) 37-43 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-30, 4-38 Spring City, KY (ORN) 15-18 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Spring Street, Tupelo, MS (SAM) 10-49 Springdale, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Springers Branch, MS (SAM) 10-54 Springfield, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Springfield Millrace, OR (NPP) 37-42 Springfield, SD Water Intake (MRO) 26-17 Spruce Run, Ben Avon, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA (NPS) 38-25 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-58 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL (NCR) 23-11 St Catherines Sound, MD (NAB) 4-39 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-30 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam 25-9 St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-42, 9- 53 St. Clair County, AL (SAM) 10-54 St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (1930 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 St. Clair River, MI (NCE) 21-31, 21-64, 21-81, 21-89 St. Croix River, ME (NED) 1-46 St. Croix River, MN and WI (NCS) 24-23, 24-30 St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR (LMM) 13-6 St. George, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-10, 40-13 St. George Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-17 St. Georges Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39, 4-43 St. Hilaire, MN (NCS) 24-30 St. James, Beaver Island, MI (NCE) 21-85 St. Jeromes Creek, MD (NAB) 4-39 St. John River Basin, ME (NED) 1-50 St. Johns County, FL (SAJ) 9-48 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-42 St. Jones River, DE, Delaware Bay to Lebanon Jetties and new entrance at mouth (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 St. Joseph Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-32, 21-65, 21-81 St. Joseph River, MI (NCE) 21-85 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LSM) 14-18 St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL (LSM) 14-3, 14-11 St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-31, 9-43 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID (NPS) 38-28 St. Marks River, FL (SAM) 10-56, 10-50 St. Mary's, AK (NPA) 40-17 St. Mary's, WV (ORHI) 17-22 St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (1942 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-33, 21-65, 21-81 St. Michaels Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-39 St. Patricks Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-24 St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-24 St. Paul Harbor, MN 25-7 St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-10, 40-13 St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-16, 24-21 St. Peters Creek. MD (NAB) 4-40 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-51 St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT (NPS) 38-28 St. Regis River, MT (NPS) 38-28, 38-29 St. Thomas Harbor, VI (SAJ) 9-51 Stamford, CT (NED) 1-23, 1-35, 1-42 Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) (NED) 1-53 Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) (NED) 1-53 Stamford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Star Valley, AZ (SPL) 33-32 Starlings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 1-64 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-28 State Highway Ill Bridge, Lake Texana, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21 State Highway 156, Kay County, OK (SWT) 29-28 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA (NPP) 37-37 State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (NCS) 24-16, 24-21, 24-24 Staten Island, NY (NAN) 2-32 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY (NAN) 2-30 Ste. Genevieve Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LSM) 14-18 Ste. Genevieve, MO (LSM) 14-1.3 Steinhatchee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Sterling Center, MN (NCS) 24-30 Sterling, KS (SWT) 29-29 Stevens Creek, Decatur, IL (NCR) 23-16 Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL (NCR) 23-16 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel (SPL) 33-33 Stikine River, AK (NPA) 40-15 Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA (NPS) 38-28 Stillaguamish River, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20, Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT (NPS) 38-28 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-30, 4-38 Stillwater River, MT (NPS) 38-28 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR (NPP) 37-39 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA (SPK) 35-38 Stockton Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (MRK) 27-9, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson County, KS (MRK) 27-17 Stoner Creek, North Middleton, KY (ORL) 16-37 Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Stoney Branch, Rock Hill, SC (SAN) 7-21 Stoney Creek, Branford, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Stonington Harbor, CT (NED) 1-46 Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Stonington Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-53 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH (NED) 1-50 Stonycreek River, Johnstown, PA (reconnaisance) (ORP) 18-30 Stratford, CT (NED) 1-53 Strawberry Hill, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Stream 5B13, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL (LSM) 14-17 Strong Creek, Hope, ID (NPS) 38-28 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-17 Stuart, VA (SAW) 6-26 Stumpy Point Bay, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (NCE) 21-37, 21-67, 21-83 Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY (NCB) 20-38 Sturgis, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. I and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Sucker Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-56 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (ORL) 16-38 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery County, IN (ORL)16-39 Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-53 Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 Suisun Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Suisun Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 Suisun Point Channel, CA (SPK) 35-38 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX (SWF) 30-23 Sulphur River, AR and TX (LMN) 11-14 Sulphur RW Red River, Franklin City, TX (SWF) 30-23 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Summerville Creek, Dorchester County, SC (SAN) 7-21 Sumner Parker Airport, OR (NPP) 37-39 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-30 Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Sun River, Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-19 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) (ORN) 15-18 Sunbury, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-11, 2-20, 2-27 1-65 Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-5, 5-9 Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-15, 33-24, 33-30 Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NED) 1-16, 1-33, 1-56 Surveillance of Northern Waters and International Water Studies Detroit District (NCE) 21-42, 21-68 Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-23 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-14 Chicago District (NCC) 22-12 Detroit District (NCE) 21-46 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-12 Galveston District (SWG) 31-18 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-10 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 - Nashville District (ORN) 15-7 New England Division (NED) 1-27 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-7, 5-10 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-16 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-11 Seattle District (NPS) 38-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-18 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-13 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-8 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD (NAB) 4-40, 4-44 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-40 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA (NAB) 4-20, 4-38 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Suwannee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, AR (SWL) 28-23 Swan Creek, OH (NCB) 20-44 Swanton Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-34 Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA (SAM) 10-49 Sweetwater Creek, NC (SAW) 6-27 Sweetwater River, CA (SPL) 33-13, 33-17, 33-29 Swift Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-30 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, NC (SAW) 6-26 Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Sykesville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Syracuse, 1O(HO RH) 17-22 T Table Rock Lake, MO (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 Tacoma Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-25 Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-17 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-33 Tahola, WA (NPS) 38-28 Tahquitz Creek (SPL) 33-32 Talkeetna River, AK (NPA) 40-16 Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS (SAM) 10-22, 10-34, 10-44 Tallahalla Creek, Pascagoula River, MS (SAM) 10-46 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS (LMK) 12-16 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-10 Tama, IA (NCR) 23-16 Tamaqua, PA (NAP) 3-29 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, FL (SAJ) 9-44 Tampa Harbor (Port Sutton), FL (SAJ) 9-32 Tampa Harbor Branch Channels, FL (SAJ) 9-46 Tampa Harbor East Bay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-31 Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-31, 9-44 Tangier Channels, VA (NAO) 5-15 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA (NAO) 5-16 Tangipahoa River, LA (LMN) 11-14 Tanque Verde, AZ (SPL) 33-33 Tar River and Tributaries, NC (SAW) 6-26 Tar River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Tar River, Princeville, NC (SAW) 6-26 Tarentum, PA (ORP) 18-22 1-66 Tarrytown Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-11, 2-20, 2-25 Taskinas Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-53 Taunton River, MA (NED) 1-46 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Taylors Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21, 31-36, 31-46 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30, 16-35 Taylorsville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-12, 16-18 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (SPL) 33-33 Tell City, IN (ORL) 16-24, 16-25, 16-30, 16-35 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX (SWF) 30-23 Ten Mile River, Chesire, CT (NED) 1-55 Tenants Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-24, 29-26 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA (ORP) 18-22 Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee River, Clinton, TN (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-11, 15-16, 15-17 Tennessee River UT Experiment Station (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee-Tombighee Waterway, AL and MS (SAM) 10-16, 10-32, 10-43, 10-53 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-12 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS (SAM) 10-17, 10-32, 10-43 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA (LMK) 12-16 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-28 Terre Noire Creek, AR (LMK) 12-18 Teton River, Chateau/Teton County, CO (MRO) 26-24 Teton River, ID (NPW) 39-17 Teton River, Teton County, MT (MRO) 26-24 Teton RV/Chateau/Teton County, MT (MRO) 26-25 Texas City and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-21, 31-36 Texas City Channel, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-20, 31-34, 31-39, 31-46 Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA (NED) 1-23 Thames River, CT (NED) 1-46 Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR (NPP) 37-36 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA (NPP) 37-36 The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lacke Celilo, WA and OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-27, 37-35, 37-45 The Inland Route, MI (NCE) 21-16, 21-55, 21-75 The Island Lake, VT (NED) 1-53 Thimble Shoals Channel, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-9, 5-13, 5-15 Thomas Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 Thomas Creek, Reno, NV (SPK) 35-45 Thomaston Dam, CT (NED) 1-19, 1-34 Thoroughfare Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-27 Three Forks, Lower Madison River (MRO) 26-19 Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-14 Three Rivers, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Three Rivers, TX (SWG) 31-38 Threemile Creek, Mobile, LA (SAM) 10-22, 10-34, 10-44 Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA (NED) 1-53 Thurman to Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-23 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA (LMN) 11-14 Ticonderoga River, NY (NAN) 2-34 Tiger Creek, Columbus, GA (SAM) 10-49 Tijuana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-33 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-40 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-24, 37-32 Tillamook River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-30 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR (SWL) 28-5 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only), PA (NAP) 3-31 Tocks Island, PA, NJ and NY (NAP) 3-31 Todd Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Toledo Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-20, 20-37 Tolovana River (Snagging), AK (NPA) 40-15 Tolu, KY (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID (NPW) 39-16 1-67 To bigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL (SAM) 10-22, 10-34, 10-44 Tombighee River & Tributaries, MS & AL (SAM) 10-23, 10-34, 10-44 Tombighee River at Columbus Port, MS (SAM) 10-46 Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-49 Tombigbee River, Demopolis, AL (SAM) 10-49 Toms River, NJ (NAP) 3-10, 3-19, 3-24 Toms River, NJ, Channel 12 feet deep (NAP) 3-28 Tonawanda Creek, Block Church Road, Niagara County, NY (NCB) 20-45: Tonawanda Creek Road, Erie County, NY (NCB) 20-45 Tonawanda Creek Road, Minnick, NY (NCB) 20-45 Tonawanda Creek, Tonawanda Creek Road, Niagara, NY (NCB) 20-45 Tongue Point, OR (NPP) 37-36 Tongue River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26, Tonto Creek at Gisela, AZ (SPL) 33-33 Tonto Creek, Punkin Center, AZ (SPL) 33-33 Tonto Creek, Roosevelt Gardens East, AZ (SPL) 33-33: Topeka, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Topsail Bay and Surf City, NC (SAW) 6-27 Toronto Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 Toronto Lake, KS (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-23, 29-26 Torrington, East Branch, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-58 Torrington, West Branch, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-58 Totuskey Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15, Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-17, 39-18, Toussaint River, Carroll Township, OH (NCB) 20-21, 20-38 Towanda Lake, KS (SWT) 29-26 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-58 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (NED) 1-48 Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX (SWE) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX (SWE) 30-23 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NED) 1-24, 1-36, 1-42 Town Creek, Americus, GA (SAM) 10-47 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY (ORL) 16-24 Town Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40, 4-44 Town Creek, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-12, 7-16 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA (NED) 1-24, 1-36, 1-42 Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-29 Townshend Lake, VT (NED) 1-17, 1-33, 1-56 Trabuco Dam (SPL) 33-34 Tradewater River, KY (ORL) 16-23 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX (SWG) 31-38 Tranters Creek, NC (SAW) 6-27 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Treasure Island, MO (LMM) 13-6 Tred Avon River, MD (NAB) 4-40 Tremplealeau River, Arcadia, WI (NCS) 24-29 Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, NC (SAW) 6-27 Trent River, NC (SAW) 6-24, 6-26 Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Trexler Lake, PA (NAP) 3-31 Tri Pond Levee, IL (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Tributary to Dudley Branch (SWF) 30-23 Trim Cane Creek, Okitbbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-49 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO (MRK) 27-17 Trinidad Lake, CO (SWA) 32-9, 32-15 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-9, 31-20, 31-34, 31-39, 31-46 Trinity River Project, TX (SWF) 30-2, 30-15, 30-21 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-36 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV (SPL) 33-13, 33-17 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY (ORL) 16-36 Troy, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Truckee Meadows, NV (SPK) 35-26, 35-35 Truckee River and Tributaries, CA and NV (SPK) 35-39 Trumbell Creek, MT (NPS) 38-31 Trumbull Lake, CT (NED) 1-50 Trussville, AL (SAM) 10-47 Truth or Consequences Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-14, 32-18 Tualatin, OR (NPP) 37-39 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Tuckahoe River, MD (NAB) 4-40 Tuckerton Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (NED) 1-53 1-68 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Tully Lake, MA (NED) 1-17, 1-33, 1-56 Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-23, 29-25 Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK (SWT) 29-27 Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA (NAB) 4-41 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-21 Turkey River, Elgin Sewage Treatment, IA (NCC) 23-16 Turkey River, Elkader, IA (NCR) 23-16 Turkey River, Fayette County Road B64, IA (NCC) 23-16 Turner Creek, Corinth, MS (LMM) 13-6 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-50, 9-63 Turtle Cree, PA (ORP) 18-22 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK (SWT) 29-25 Turtle Creek, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13, 18-22 Tuscon Diversion Channel (SPL) 33-33 Tuskahoma Lake, OK (SWT) 29-25 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-7,' 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS Road and Bridge (1976 Act) (MRK) 27-19, 27-20 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road Improvement - 1974 Mod.) (MRK) 27-19, 27-20 Twelvemile Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-22 Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS (SAM) 10-47 Twin Valley Lake, MN (NCS) 24-24 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-40 Two Harbors, MN (NCE) 21-37, 21-67, 21-83 Two Rivers Dam, NM (SWA) 32-10, 32-15 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-38, 21-67, 21-84 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-88 Tyaskin Creek, MD (NAB) 4-40 Tybee Island, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-13, 8-19 Tygart Lake, WV (ORP) 18-3, 18-13, 18-18 Tylers Beach Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-15 Tyrone, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 U U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-21 Umatilla Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-36 Umatilla River (Echo), OR (NPP) 37-40 Umatilla River, OR (NPW) 39-16 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR (NPP) 37-39, 37-42 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-39 Umatilla River Water District, OR (NPP) 37-42 Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR (NPP) 37-39 Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-24, 37-32 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Umpqua River, Winchester Bay, OR (NPP) 37-41 Unadilla, NY (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Union Creek/Stanton Bridge, NE (MRO) 26-25 Union Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 Union River, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Union Township Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13 Union Village Dam, VT (NED) 1-18, 1-33, 1-56 Uniontown, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-30, 16-35 Uniontown, PA (ORP) 18-24 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA (SPL) 33-34 Unnamed Creek, Tioga, ND (MRO) 26-24 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-23, 10-34, 10-44 Upper Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Upper Grays River Area, WA (NPP) 37-37 Upper Jordan River, CA (SPK) 35-26, 35-35 Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS (SWT) 29-29 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-40 Upper Marlboro, MD (NAB) 4-41, 4-44 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (LSM) 14-7 Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study (NCR) 23-3, 23-7 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP)(NCS) 24-3 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI (NCR) 23-3, 23-7, 23-9 Upper Missouri River, SD Streambank Erosion Control Project (MRO) 26-18 Upper Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-28 Upper River Rouge, MI (NCE) 21-85 Upper Sulpher Spring, CA (SPL) 33-33 Upper Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-40 Upper White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 1-69 Upper White River, AR (SWL) 28-21 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Urban Areas of Alton, IL (LSM) 14-17 Urbanna Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 US Highway 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Utica, IN (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 , Utica, OH (ORH) 17-23, 17-24 V Valdez Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-15 Valley, AL (SAM) 10-49 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-23 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-24 Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Van Meter, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Vanceburg, KY (ORH) 17-21 Vancouver Lake Area, WA (NPP) 37-38 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Vaughn, MT, Sun River, Great Falls (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Velva (Bonnes Coulee), ND (NCS) 24-29 Velva, ND (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-16, 33-25, 33-30, 35-33 Ventura-Pierpoint Area, CA (SPL) 33-30 . Ventura River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-33 Ventura River Levee (SPL) 33-33 Verdigris River City Basin, KS (SWT) 29-28 Vermilion Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-38 Vermillion River and Tributaries, SD (MRO) 26-18 Vermillion River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-23 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD (MRO) 26-20 Vernon Branch, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-49 Verona (Mouth of Feather River), CA (SPK) 35-41 Verona Lake, VA (NAB) 4-41 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-25, 24-29 Vevay, IN (ORL) 16-28 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Victoria Beach, East Haven, CT (NED) 1-54 Victory Lake, VT (NED) 1-53 Villa Park Dam (SPL) 33-34 Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (SAM) 10-23, 10-34, 10-44 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawerence Counties, AR (SWL) 28-23 Village Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR (SWL) 28-23 Village of New Athens, IL (LSM) 14-17 Village of Saxtons, VT (NED) 1-50 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-21, 31-36 Vincennes, IN (Partial) (ORL) 16-28 Vincennes, IN (Uncompleted Portion) (ORL) 16-32 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-30, 16-35 Vineyard Haven Harbor, MA (NED) 1-54 Vineyard Haven, MA (NED) 1-46 Vinton Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-16 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA (NAO) 5-16 Virginia Beach, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-9, 5-13 Volga, IA (NCR) 23-15 W W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY (LMM) 13-6 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-16, 6-20 W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK (SWT) 29-26 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL (LSM) 14-15 Wabash River, Adams County, IN (ORL) 16-36 Wabash River Basin (ORL) 16-12, 16-21 Wabash River, near Merom, IN (ORL) 16-37 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-37, 16-39 Wabash River, Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-39 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road (ORL) 16-37, 16-39 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West (ORL) 16-37 Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL (ORL) 16-25 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN (NCS) 24-17, 24-21 Wabasha Harbor, MN 25-7 Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-17, 24-21 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, NC & SC (SAW) 6-26 1-70 Waccamaw River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-17 Waco Creek, Waco, TX (SWF) 30-23 Waco Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-21, 30-23 Wagoner County, CO (SWT) 29-29 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No.1, WA (NPP) 37-37 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (NPP) 37-38 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI,(POD) 36-7 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Waimea Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 Wainwright, AK (NPA) 40-17 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-11 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR (NPP) 37-40 Walla Walla River, WA (NWP) 39-18 Wallabout Channel, NY (NAN) 2-30 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, NC (SAW) 6-24 Wallace Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Wallace, WV (ORP) 18-23 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH (NED) 1-48 Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG) 31-9 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR (NPW) 39-16 Walluski River Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (detalied project report) (ORP) 18-30 Walnut Creek, CA (SPK) 35-21, 35-31 Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX (SWF) 30-23 Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK (SWT) 29-27 Walnut Creek, Seguin, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX (SWF) 30-23 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS (SWT) 29-28 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-27, 10-35 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY (NAN) 2-32 Wappinger Creek, NY (NAN) 2-30 Ware, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-53 Wareham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-46 Wareham-Marion, MA (NED) 1-53 Warner Road at Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-25 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul. MN (NCS) 24-25, 24-29 Warren River, RI (NED) 1-46 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Warrenton Diking District, OR (NPP) 37-42 Warrenville Township, Mill Creek, OH (NCB) 20-45 Warroad Harbor and River, MN (NCS) 24-3, 24-19, 24-22, 24-26 Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN (NCS) 24-26 Warsaw Harbor, IL 25-8 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek (NCB) 20-43 Warwick Cove, RI (NED) 1-46 Warwick River (NAB) 4-40 Warwood, WV (ORP) 18-24 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-22 Washington Canal and South River, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Washington DC and Vicinity (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Washington Harbor, DC (NAB) 4-10, 4-27, 4-36 Washington Island, WI (NCE) 21-84 Washington on Brazos State Park, TX (SWF) 30-23 Washington, PA (ORP) 18-22 Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR (NPP) 37-38 Water Resources Support Center 47-1 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO (SWL) 28-23 Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Waterbury Dam, VT (NAN) 2-16 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 2-32 Waterbury, VT (NAN) 2-34 Waterbury-Watertown, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-58 Wateree River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Waterford, NY (NAN) 2-34 Waterloo, IA (Bridges) (NCR) 23-15 Waterloo, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Waterloo, NE (MRO) 26-17, 26-21 Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland, IA (MRO) 26-23 Watertown and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-23 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-24 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-30 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, NC (SAW) 6-24 Waterway from Empire, LA to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-14 1-71 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE (NAP) 3-27 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (LMN) 11-11, 11-14 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-43 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA (LMN) 11-14 Waterway - Norfolk, VA to Sounds of NC (SAW) 6-24 Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-9, 5-13 Waterways Experiment Station 44-1 Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-46 Waukegan Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-5, 22-14, 22-19, 22-21 Waurika Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-20, 29-23 Waveland, MS (SAM) 10-49 Waverley, WV (ORH) 17-22 Waycake Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Webb District Improvement Co, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Webber Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK (SWT) 29-26 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-21, 29-24 Weber River and Tributaries, UT (SPK) 35-41 Weegie/Pipe Creeks, Shadyside, OH (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Weeks Bay, AL (SAM) 10-48 Weiser River, Cambridge-Midvale (NPW) 39-18 Weiser River, ID (NPW) 39-16 Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-7 Wellfleet Harbor, MA (NED) 1-46 Wells Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Wellsburg, WV (ORP) 18-24 Wellsville, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-43 Wellsville, OH, Section I (ORP) 18-22 Wellsville, OH, Section II (ORP) 18-22 Wenatchie River, WA (NPS) 38-29 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA (NED) 1-48 West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA (LMN) 11-12 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 West Branch, Indian Creek, Nevada, IA (NCR) 23-16 West Branch Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY (NCB) 20-44 West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB) 4-21, 4-38 West Branch, Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-21 West Branch, Pebble Creek, Dodge, NE (MRO) 26-24 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA (NED) 1-50 West Bridgewater, PA (ORP) 18-24 West Brookfield Reservoir, MA (NED) 1-53 West Canaan Lake, NH (NED) 1-53 West Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 West Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-6, 23-8, 23-10 West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-39 West Fork, Des Moines River, MN (NCR) 23-16 West Fork, Drakes Creek, TN & KY (ORL) 16-25 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-12, 16-18, 16-25, 16-33 West Fork River, Clarksburg, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 West Fork, WV (ORH) 17-23 West Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-21, 20-38 West Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-12, 1-31 West Hill, Worcester, MA (NED) 1-55 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (ORP) 18-22 West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR (NPP) 37-39 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR (NPP) 37-40 West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-23 West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-23 West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock, IA (MRO) 26-23 West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland, IA (MRO) 26-23 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 West Oneonta Lake, NY (NAB) 4-43 West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA (SAM) 10-47 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA (SAM) 10-27, 10-35, 10-45 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL (SAS) 8-i 1 West Point, NE (MRO) 26-17, 26-21 West River, New Haven, CT (NED) 1-25, 1-36, 1-42, 1-60 West Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-35 1-72 West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25, 16-30, 16-35 West Thompson Lake, CT (NED) 1-24, 1-35, 1-60 West Union, Middle Island, WV (ORH) 17-24 West Warren, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Westchester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-30, 2-34 Westcott Cove, CT (NED) 1-46 Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-15 Westerly, RI (NED) 1-53 Westfield, MA (NED) 1-53 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA (NPS) 38-25 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Weston Mills, Olean, NY (ORP) 18-23 Weston Mils, Portville, NY (ORP) 18-23 Weston, VT (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Westpoint, KY (ORL) 16-25, 16-32 Westport, CT (NED) 1-53 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR (NPP) 37-37 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (NED) 1-46 Westport, KY (ORL) 16-28, 16-32 Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA (NPP) 37-41 Westport River, MA (NED) 1-53 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) (NPP) 37-40 Westport Slough, OR (NPP) 37-36 Westville Lake, MA (NED) 1-24, 1-35, 1-60 Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-6, 11-9 Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE (MRO) 26-24 Weymouth Back River, CT (NED) 1-46 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge (NAP) 3-27, 3-30 Wheeler Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) (ORP) 18-24 Wheeling, WV (ORP) 18-24 Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 18-24 Whelton Ditch, OR (NPP) 37-38 Whisperings Subdivision, AZ (SPL) 33-33 White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-46 White Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 White Oak Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, NC (SAW) 6-26 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) (SWL) 28-21 White River, AR (below Newport) (LMM) 13-5 White River, at Hwy. 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Basin (Little Rock District, AR & MO) (SWL) 28-9, 28-16, 28-19, 28-30 White River, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-16 White River, Elnora, IN (ORL) 16-38 White River, Franklin County, IN (ORL) 16-39 White River, Hagerstown, IN (ORL) 16-38 White River, Hazleton, IN (ORL) 16-38 White River, IN (ORL) 16-23 White River, Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 28-21, 28-23 White River, Newport, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN (ORL) 16-37 White River, Petersburg, IN (ORL) 16-38 White River, Road 400W, Pike County, IN (ORL) 16-39 White River, St. Paul, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River, Tripp County Road, SD (MRO) 26-24 White River, Winner, SD (MRO) 26-20 Whitebird Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-85 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork, Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-36 Whitewater River and Tributaries, IN & OH (ORL) 16-25 Whitewater River Basin Floodwarning System, CA (SPL) 33-9 33-17, 33-29 Whitewater River, CA (SPL) 33-33 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN (ORL) 16-37 Whitings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-16 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ (SPL) 33-9, 33-29 Whitmanville Lake, MA (NED) 1-50, 1-59 Whitney Lake, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-21 Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-30 Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB) 4-19, 4-30 Whittier, AK (NPA) 40-17 1-73 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-27 Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek (SWT) 29-27 Wichita, KS (SWT) 29-29 Wickford Harbor, RI (NED) 1-46, 1-61 Wicomico River, MD (NAB) 4-11, 4-27, 4-36 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-18 Wilbur D. Mills Lock and Dam (No. 2) (SWL) 28-24 Wilcox, PA (ORP) 18-24 Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN (NCS) 24-30 Wild Rice River, Lake Ida, MN (NCS) 24-30 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN (NCS) 24-25 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA, CA (SPK) 35-22, 35-31 Wildcat Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Wildcat Creek, Howard County, IN (ORL) 16-38 Wildcat Creek, Kokomo, IN (ORL) 16-38 Wilders, KY (ORL) 16-32 Wiley Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-40 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR (NPP) 37-40 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portion) (NPP) 37-40 Willamette River above Portland and Yambill River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NPP),37-9, 37-24, 37-32, 37-40, 37-42 Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR (NPP) 37-15, 37-26, 37-34 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-38 Willamette River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Willapa River at Raymond, WA (NPS) 38-28 William H. Harsha Lake, OH (ORL) 16-13. 16-18, 16-33 William L. Springer Lake, Decatur, IL (NCR) 23-14 Williams Delight Basin, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-63 Williamson, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Williamsport, AK (NPA) 40-17 Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-41, 4-45 Williamstown, WV (ORH) 17-22 Williamsville Reservoir, VT (NED) 1-53 Williston, ND Water Intake (MRO) 26-17 Willoughby Channel, VA (NAO) 5-16 Willow Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 Willow Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NPP) 37-15, 37-26, 37-34 Willow Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-16 Willow Creek Unit (NPW) 39-17 Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP) 3-11, 3-19, 3-24 Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-19 Wilmington Harbor, NC, Passing Lane (SAW) 6-28 Wilmington Harbor. NC, Turns and Bends (SAW) 6-28 Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, NC (SAW) 6-27 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration (NCC) 22-23 Wilmore, PA (ORP) 18-22 Wilson Branch, SC (SAN) 7-21 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Wilson Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-21, 20-38 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Wilson Point Harbor, CT (NED) 1-46 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR (NPP) 37-39 Winchester bay, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Winfield L&D (ORH) 17-12 Winfield LPP, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-29 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH (NED) 1-46 Winona Harbors, MN 25-7 Winona, MN (NCS) 24-25 Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-34 Winsor Park, Las Vegas, NV (SPL) 33-33 Winsted, CT (NED) 1-50, 1-57 Winter Harbor ME (NED) 1-46 Winter Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-16 Winthrop Beach, MA (NED) 1-48 Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-53 Winthrop Harbor, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Winthrop Shore Drive, Winthrop, MA (NED) 1-54 Wisconsin River, WI (NCS) 24-23 Wishart Point Channel, VA (NAO) 5-16 Wister Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Wister Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-20, 29-23, 29-26 Withlacoochee River, FL (SAJ) 9-51, 9-53 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS (SAM) 10-46 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 1-74 Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-10 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA (NCR) 23-16 Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK (SWT) 29-27 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-47 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN (LMM) 13-5 Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME (NED) 1-9, 1-30, 1-40 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-17 Wood River, Grand Island, NE (MRO) 26-23 Woodbridge Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Woodhury Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Woodlands, WV (ORP) 18-24 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-11, 1-31, 1-41 Woods Hole Channel, MA (NED) 1-46 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Woodson Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-50 Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-56 Worcester Diversion, MA (NED) 1-50 Worcester, MA (NED) 1-56 Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-15 Wrangell Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-13 Wrangell Narrows, AK (NPA) 40-15, 40-17 Wrangell Narrows Channel, AK (NPA) 40-17 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-18, 30-21 Wrights Creek, NC (SAW) 6-24 Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-20 Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 Wynoochee Lake, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA (NPS) 38-28 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-28 Wyoming Valley, PA (NAB) 4-41 Y Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW) 6-13, 6-3129 Yakima County (Yakima River), WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPW) 39-16 Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, Yakima, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yalobusha River, MS (LMK) 12-17 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-36 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-24, 37-32 Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-36, 37-42 Yaquina River, Port of Toledo, OR (NPP) 37-41 Yatesville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-17 Yellow Bend Port, AR (LMK) 12-17 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA (SAM) 10-47 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, MT (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, Glendive, MT (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, Highway 89 Bridge, MT (MRO) 26-24 Yellowstone River, MT (MRO) 26-24 Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, Route 111, Livingstone, MT (MRO) 26-24 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, New Big Timber, MT (MRO) 26-20 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT (MRO) 26-17, 26-19 Yellowstone River Water Plant, Livingston (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone County Bridge, Near Billings, MT (MRO) 26-20 Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River, CA (SPK) 35-27 Yonkers, Nepera Park, NY (NAN) 2-36 Yonkers, NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-32 York Harbor, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-61 York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB) 4-22, 4-30, 4-38 York River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-16 York Spit Channel (NAO) 5-3, 5-11 1-75 Yough, Turkeyfoot Township, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD (ORP) 18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization) (ORP) 18-24 Youngs and Claskine River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Youngs Bay, OR (NPP) 37-42 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Youngstown, OH (ORP) 18-22 Z Zacate Creek Channel, TX (SWF) 30-22 Zacate Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Zanesville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Zintel Canyon Dam, WA (NWP) 39-4, 39-10, 39-13, 39-16 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-23 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-19 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN (NCS) 24-25,.24-29 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN (NCS) 24-25 Zumbro River, MN (NCS) 24-25, 24-29, 24-30 1-76